On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:27:56 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:26:39 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
After a Scientific Creationist makes an argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references, ...
Where? When? Who? All your guys are doing is making bold unevidenced
statements like 'We know evolution cannot happen. Therefore Goddidit
is the only logical answer'. Your guys suck!
When the laws of physics stipulates that life could not start on it's own, ...
Please, use "reasoning, science and plenty of references".
You're doing precisely what I accuse you, and creationists in general,
of doing. Present bold, unevidenced assertions as proven facts. Don't
you see it?
... without the assistance of an engineer, it's simply put, that life did not start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This is simply just a fact. ...
Called it! I swear I had not read this far when I wrote the above.
The constraints of physics and the laws of science simply do not allow for the a self-actualizing biosystem.
You continue to spew unevidenced blah, blah, blah. It is not "simply
just a fact" that unaided abiogenesis cannot happen. Try this on for
'It is simply just a fact that there are no gods. Therefore all
religions are false.'
And no, I'm not serious. I'd never use the same, flawed logic you use.
Post by Malte Runz
... the evolutionist says he doesn't have a degree. Often the evolutionist doesn't have a degree either. ...
I don't need a degree to be able to realize the Ian Juby
(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa) is full of shit.
Then prove it to us. What did Ian Juby say that you find easy to contend with? ...
He believes the Flood happened, right? He also believes the Universe
was created by an omnipotent deity in a week. He believes all the
layers you see in the Grand Canyon were formed in a single event. He
believes the stories about magic in the Bible are all true. You know,
all the idiotic, unscientific, unevidenced religious crap you also
believe. All you get from Juby is confirmation that you're right, and,
sure, you'll go to Heaven one day.
But you're welcome to quote Juby here, and I'll address specific
claims. But don't expect me to watch hours and hours of his youtube
stuff. Give me a specific item to play with.
... Otherwise you sound like you're bluffing, adding no facts to back up your claim. Not one fact . Nada. You made an opinion and we are expected to believe it because you say, and I quote, "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)". ...
Opinions are not to be believed, just registered. And I'm pretty sure
you now know how I feel about Juby. Mission accomplished.
... I'm a college graduate who also happened to study in an unusual Christian college youth group (that trained us to use reason) and I cannot accept "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" as an indicator of truth. ...
It was never meant to be. But you want me to accept "... life did not
start on its own without the assistance of an engineer. This is
simply just a fact." You know I don't accept your facts as a fact, but
you didn't find it necessary to make "an argument using reasoning,
science and plenty of references". You never do.
... I want to know what your reasons are and "(hahahaaaaahahahaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa)" doesn't provide it. ...
I laugh at 'Professor Juby' because he pretends to believe in things
that are not true, and he tries to convince others that they are. Like
'T. rex was vegetarian'. God damned! Do you understand how wrong that
is, and how easy it is to show that it is wrong? Juby does, but he is
lying to you, kiddo, and that's how he makes a living. Juby, Geller,
Comfort, Ham... they're leaches and I loathe them all.
... What if I responded to your laughing by stating, urgagurgagooooha-ha!!! ...
That would be perfectly all right. You'd make as much sense as you
You wouldn't accept my answer so why should I except yours? ...
I know you never do. Whether I supply you with links, quotes and
explanations, or laugh out loud and long, none of it leaves a mark.
'Piltdown man was a fraaaaaaaud!', or, in one word:
... You claim to stand for science and reasoning, so provide it. And provide it now.
Or else? I know, you get a lot of reactions to your posts, and nobody
expects you to respond to it all. But it is quite telling that when
you do choose to reply to one of my posts, you choose the simple ones.
The 'ha ha posts' and never, never ever my posts where I make "an
argument using reasoning, science and plenty of references". Those you
always ignore and prefer to go looking for somebody who'll play the
'you're emotional, no you're emotional, no you're emotional, ook ook
monkey donkey game'. (You know who you are, and I wish you'd stop.)