Discussion:
Sharia Law In America - Conservatives: The New Taliban
(too old to reply)
American Thinker
2017-11-22 03:13:17 UTC
Permalink
Conservatives: The New Taliban



The Republican Taliban has offered its budget. Taliban, you
say? Really?

How does the Taliban work? They keep people stupid. Women are
witches. Jews are another species. Westerners are degenerate.
Only the "wise and powerful" Taliban leaders know what the
Koran really says, because they're the only ones who can
read, write, or tell everybody else what's real.

There was a time when the Muslim world was enlightened. They
invented the writing and math that we use today. They were
the center of the world for science. But then, in some
places, the Taliban took over.

And don't for a minute think that it's really all about
religion. Religion is just used to manipulate the useful
idiots. It's really about money, power, and control. And that
can only be held by thugs like the Taliban when the people
are kept poor and stupid.

Here in America, there's a new Taliban rising. They fetishize
guns, just like the Afghan Taliban. They fear women and
education. They want to keep the people stupid and in chains.

They're the plutocrats and the billionaires who rose to power
on the heels of Reagan's trickle-down economics. And now,
what's trickling down to us is their stupidity.

As Mark Morford wrote for the San Francisco Chronicle's blog
SF Gate, "Six percent of Americans believe in unicorns.
Thirty-six percent believe in UFOs. A whopping 24 percent
believe dinosaurs and man hung out together. Eighteen percent
still believe the sun revolves around the Earth. Nearly 30
percent believe cloud computing involves... actual clouds. A
shockingly sad 18 percent, to this very day, believe the
president is a Muslim. Do you believe in angels? Forty-five
percent of Americans do. In fact, roughly 48 percent –
Republicans and Democrats alike – believe in some form of
creationism."

So why do Americans believe in such absurd things? Because
they're being taught these ridiculous beliefs in our nation's
schools, and hearing them from our corporatized media.

All across America, our children are learning from the
curriculum of the plutocrats and billionaires. In Louisiana
for example, children learn about how hippies were dirty,
rock musicians worship Satan, and climate change is one big
lie.

But America's new Taliban isn't just controlling what's being
taught in our classrooms. They're also dictating what's being
shown on America's billionaire-backed corporatized media.

That's where the likes of Rupert Murdoch come in.

Thanks to Murdoch, millions of Americans are subjected to the
mountains of misinformation and half-truths that pour out of
Fox So-Called News on a daily basis.

There used to be a time in our country when the mainstream
media actually had to report on the "news". But times have
changed.

In 1986, Reagan ended the FCC doctrine that required radio
and TV stations to actually carry "real news" as a "public
service," and within two years the money-losing news services
had come under network entertainment divisions and all news
decisions since then have been made based on ratings.

Oh, and, the following year Rush Limbaugh started his radio
show.

And now, plutocrat extraordinaires the Koch brothers are
looking to buy several major American newspapers, so that
they can dictate what Americans read in their morning paper.

The Kochtopus is interested in buying the Tribune Company
newspapers, which includes the Chicago Tribune, Baltimore Sun
and the Los Angeles Times. According to the Hollywood
Reporter, the Kochtopus is "interested in the clout they
could gain through the Times' editorial pages."

Now, I can talk about all of this openly here, because most
of the people who will vote for the new American Taliban
don't bother to inform themselves with real "news", don't
engage in critical thinking, and don't want to know what's
really going on in the world.

They love their ignorance, their bigotry, and most of all,
their Fox News.

From Thomas Jefferson to John F. Kennedy, we have always, as
a nation, held high the ideal of a quality education for
everybody.

As Jefferson wrote in a letter to George Wythe, his mentor,
in 1786, "I think by far the most important bill in our whole
code is that for the diffusion of knowledge among the people.
No other sure foundation can be devised, for the preservation
of freedom and happiness... Preach, my dear Sir, a crusade
against ignorance; establish & improve the law for educating
the common people."

Today, America faces a choice.

We can hand our country over to the new Taliban, and watch as
the plutocrats and billionaires consolidate even more wealth,
power and control over information in this country.

Or, we can fight for a progressive America, where there is a
universal, high quality education for all, a strong social
safety net and a broad and strong middle class.

This choice looms large in the current budget debate. The
Republican budget cuts funding to education, the social
safety net, and makes the rich richer while making the poor
and middle class poorer.

Meanwhile, the Democratic budget requires the rich to pay
something a little bit closer to their fair share, and uses
those funds to strengthen education, the social safety net,
and the middle class.

So America, it's up to you.

Your choice: Do you want the billionaire-backed Republican
Taliban in control, or a Democratic America, where unicorns
and dinosaurs are only talked about in children's fantasy
books?
--
Rightists are spineless and obedient, void of critical
thinking and reason
default
2017-11-22 15:54:18 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 03:13:17 +0000 (UTC), American Thinker
Post by American Thinker
Conservatives: The New Taliban
Plagiarized from:

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/15107-conservatives-the-new-taliban
Kevrob
2017-11-22 22:55:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by default
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 03:13:17 +0000 (UTC), American Thinker
Post by American Thinker
Conservatives: The New Taliban
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/15107-conservatives-the-new-taliban
Pissed at the competition?

[quote]

...Hartmann had been interested in consciousness and spirituality
since childhood, and by 1969 his interest had gone from hippie
subculture to Christian mysticism. It was during that year that he met
the head of the Coptic Center, Master Stanley. In 1971 he was ordained
as a Minister with Coptic Fellowship International. He has been a
keynote speaker at many Coptic Conferences nationally. In 1973,
Hartmann returned to Detroit to work as an engineer with RCA.

[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thom_Hartmann

I'm a libertarian rather than a "progressive," so while I
think the Muslim Taliban are whackos, and US Christian religious
nuts like the Reconstructionists would be awful if they got
control, he's just frothing when he complains about the Koch brothers.
I'm sure he would have been fine if it had been Stewart Mott* buying
media outlets. Hartmann's ratings are feeble compared to the
conservative talk show monsters, who, while down from their peak,
still bring in numbers. Ironically, the reason he can't crack
3 million listeners is the tax-subsidized competition from NPR!

Left-wing woo is garbage, just like right-wing woo.

Kevin R

(Not on either "wing.")

* http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/14/us/14mott.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Rawlings_Mott
hypatiab7
2017-11-26 16:27:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by default
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 03:13:17 +0000 (UTC), American Thinker
Post by American Thinker
Conservatives: The New Taliban
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/15107-conservatives-the-new-taliban
Pissed at the competition?
I block his messages whenever I see his nym.
Post by Kevrob
[quote]
...Hartmann had been interested in consciousness and spirituality
since childhood, and by 1969 his interest had gone from hippie
subculture to Christian mysticism. It was during that year that he met
the head of the Coptic Center, Master Stanley. In 1971 he was ordained
as a Minister with Coptic Fellowship International. He has been a
keynote speaker at many Coptic Conferences nationally. In 1973,
Hartmann returned to Detroit to work as an engineer with RCA.
[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thom_Hartmann
I'm a libertarian rather than a "progressive," so while I
think the Muslim Taliban are whackos, and US Christian religious
nuts like the Reconstructionists would be awful if they got
control, he's just frothing when he complains about the Koch brothers.
I'm sure he would have been fine if it had been Stewart Mott* buying
media outlets. Hartmann's ratings are feeble compared to the
conservative talk show monsters, who, while down from their peak,
still bring in numbers. Ironically, the reason he can't crack
3 million listeners is the tax-subsidized competition from NPR!
Left-wing woo is garbage, just like right-wing woo.
Kevin R
(Not on either "wing.")
* http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/14/us/14mott.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Rawlings_Mott
Don Martin
2017-11-23 14:36:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by default
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 03:13:17 +0000 (UTC), American Thinker
Post by American Thinker
Conservatives: The New Taliban
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/15107-conservatives-the-new-taliban
Not so much of a Thinker then, is he?
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Topaz
2017-11-22 21:39:37 UTC
Permalink
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.

Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses. There obviously is some truth to that. Enemies often
have some truth in their arguments. On top of the opium there is the
Jewish propaganda started by Scofield.

Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim ruled country.


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com radioaryan.com
Kevrob
2017-11-22 22:28:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Judeo Christians
http://national-socialist
Nobody sane wants to listen to a Nazi.

Kevin R
Dhu on Gate
2017-11-22 23:09:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.
Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses. There obviously is some truth to that. Enemies often
have some truth in their arguments. On top of the opium there is the
Jewish propaganda started by Scofield.
Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim ruled country.
www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com radioaryan.com
Fookin' drivel.

Dhu
--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)

http://babayaga.neotext.ca/PublicKeys/Duncan_Patton_a_Campbell_pubkey.txt
default
2017-11-24 10:27:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.
Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses. There obviously is some truth to that. Enemies often
have some truth in their arguments. On top of the opium there is the
Jewish propaganda started by Scofield.
Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim ruled country.
www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com radioaryan.com
Jesus was a socialist ditto Karl Marx....

The philosophy is not at fault, the execution of that philosophy is.

Once men and greed are involved... the most noble of philosophies,
cannot stand in the way of human greed.
Malcolm McMahon
2017-11-25 13:49:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by default
Post by Topaz
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.
Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses. There obviously is some truth to that. Enemies often
have some truth in their arguments. On top of the opium there is the
Jewish propaganda started by Scofield.
Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim ruled country.
www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com radioaryan.com
Jesus was a socialist ditto Karl Marx....
Not so sure. Jesus favoured the poor, but seems to have regarded poverty as a
natural law. Poverty, as such, wasn't something he seems to have been
interesting in doing something about. In fact he seems to have thought it good
for people.
Post by default
The philosophy is not at fault, the execution of that philosophy is.
Once men and greed are involved... the most noble of philosophies,
cannot stand in the way of human greed.
And of what value is a philisophical theory of governance that doesn't work
when you factor in human nature?

I'd call such a philisophy deeply flawed.
u***@tedkennedys-grave.com
2017-11-22 23:17:34 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 03:13:17 +0000 (UTC), American Thinker
Making Democrats look bad for 500 years.
Gronk
2017-11-23 06:00:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by default
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 03:13:17 +0000 (UTC), American Thinker
Making Democrats look bad for 500 years.
The parties have not existed that long.
Malcolm McMahon
2017-11-23 11:41:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by default
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 03:13:17 +0000 (UTC), American Thinker
Making Democrats look bad for 500 years.
The Democrats _were_ the conservatives not so long ago, and the Republicans the progressive.
Byker
2017-11-23 21:53:12 UTC
Permalink
There was a time when the Muslim world was enlightened. They invented the
writing and math that we use today. They were the center of the world for
science. But then, in some places, the Taliban took over.
Islamic civilization "blossomed' until its science collided with the Koran.
It's interesting that Islamic progress in math and science hit the wall when
Ulug Beq of Samarkand, the "Galileo of Islam," dared to state that the
Koranic version of the universe was all wrong. The mullahs had him put to
death and it's been downhill for the Muslim world ever since. In the West
science and religion went their separate paths during the Reformation and
the rest is history. All other fundamentalist civilizations were left in
the dust. Just think, even after all these centuries, the Islamic world has
yet to experience a Renaissance, a Reformation, or an Age of Enlightenment.
Were it not for real you'd think it was a figment of some hack
screenwriter's imagination...
Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.
Judgment Day is always JUST around the corner, just wait a little longer,
they say.

Seventh-Day Adventists and Jehovah's Witnesses have been saying just that
since the 19th Century.

I remember looking through old local newspapers from 1943 and in the Sunday
editions preacher after preacher was holding up Benito Mussolini as the
Antichrist, with his "revived Roman Empire".

Yeah, Hal Lindsey told us all about it in 1970, in "The Late Great Planet
Earth", when the Soviet Union was "Gog" and we'd all be raptured off the
earth before the world powers rained nuclear warheads on on one another and
ecological disasters right out of "The Population Bomb" killed billions of
people. We ate it right up and expected the world to come to an end at any
time. Brother Hal had us Baby Boomers thinking we were the "Terminal
Generation," also the title of one of many sequels to the LGPE.

Well, guess what, we're still here, the Soviet Union is long gone, the Baby
Boomers who were duped into believing his world-is-coming-to-an-end palaver
threw all his books away, and now the Gen-Xers and the Millennials are
falling for it, only now there's a new Gog and a new Antichrist to point
accusing fingers at. It's interesting that whenever I run across my old
counterculture compadres who were caught up in the Rapture madness of the
the early 70's and I bring up Hal Lindsey, they nervously snicker and regard
the whole episode as an embarrassing episode in their lives that they'd
rather not talk about.

When one generation burns out on the second-coming message, there's always a
new flock to fleece every thirty years or so. Like all those worthless
Nostradamus books, there's always a quick buck to be made in the Second
Coming racket, and Brother Hal and others like him continue to rake in the
shekels.
Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim-ruled country.
Fags are not like heterosexuals. The "unrequited true love" theme of
"Brokeback Mountain" doesn't reflect reality. These men would have moved on
to cruising truck stops and public "glory holes" to sate their sex addiction
rather than pining away for each other...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In his article, “The Health Risks of Gay Sex,” medical doctor John R. Diggs,
Jr. writes that “The current media portrayal of gay and lesbian
relationships is that they are as healthy, stable and loving as heterosexual
marriages — or even more so. Medical associations are promoting somewhat
similar messages.” But that portrayal is not consistent with facts.

Dr. Diggs warns that the consequences of homosexual sexual activity are
distinct from the consequences of heterosexual activity. Just as it is his
duty as a physician to recommend behaviors that are beneficial to our health
and wellbeing, likewise it is his duty to inform patients of the health
risks of gay sex — “Sexual relationships between members of the same sex
expose gays, lesbians and bisexuals to extreme risks of Sexually Transmitted
Diseases (STDs), physical injuries, mental disorders and even a shortened
life span.”

There are at least 5 major areas of differences between gay and heterosexual
relationships, each with specific medical consequences. Those differences
include:

Levels of promiscuity
Physical health
Mental health
Life span
Definition of “monogamy”
1. PROMISCUITY

The “extreme” health risks of homosexual sex are a direct consequence of
sexual promiscuity. Simply put, homosexuals are more promiscuous than
heterosexuals. Prior to the AIDS epidemic, a 1978 study found that:

75% of white gay males (3 of every 4) claimed to have had more than
100lifetime male sex partners;
15% claimed 100-249 sex partners;
17% claimed 250-499;
15% claimed 500- 999;
28% (that’s more than 1 of every 5 white gay men!) claimed more than 1,000
lifetime male sex partners.
Levels of promiscuity subsequently declined but, with the advent of AIDS
drugs, they are again approaching those of the 1970s. From 1994 to 1997, the
percentage of homosexual men reporting multiple partners and unprotected
anal sex rose from 23.6% to 33.3%, with the largest increase among men under
25. The medical consequence of this promiscuity is that gays have a greatly
increased likelihood of contracting HIV/AIDS, syphilis and other STDs.

While similarly high rates of promiscuity have not been documented among
lesbians, an Australian study did find lesbians to be more promiscuous than
straight women:

93% of lesbians reported having had sex with men. Other studies similarly
show that 75-90% of women who have sex with women have also had sex with
men.
Lesbians were 4.5 times more likely than heterosexual women(9% of lesbians
vs. 2% of heterosexual women) to have had more than 50 lifetime male sex
partners.
In addition to diseases that may be transmitted during lesbian sex, a study
at an Australian STD clinic found that lesbians were 3 to 4 times more
likely than heterosexual women to have sex with men who were high-risk for
HIV.
It goes without saying that any degree of sexual promiscuity carries the
risk of contracting STDs.

2. PHYSICAL HEALTH

Excessive sexual promiscuity and certain common sexual practices among gay
men result in epidemics like AIDS and serious medical consequences, some of
which are virtually unknown among heterosexuals. A British researcher
summarizes the danger as follows:

“penile-anal, mouth-penile, and hand-anal sexual contact is usual for both
[male homosexual] partners, and mouth-anal contact is not infrequent….
Mouth-anal contact is the reason for the relatively high incidence
ofdiseases caused by bowel pathogens in male homosexuals. Trauma may
encourage the entry of micro-organisms and thus lead to primarysyphilitic
lesions occurring in the anogenital area…. In addition to sodomy, trauma may
be caused by foreign bodies, including stimulators of various kinds, penile
adornments, and prostheses.”

a. Anal intercourse:

Beginning in the “gay” culture, anal sex has now been “popularized” among
heterosexuals via systematic propaganda of pornography.

But the simple truth is this: The human body was not designed to accommodate
anal intercourse.

The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to
suitability for penetration by a penis. The vagina has natural lubricants
and is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous
epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage and to resist
the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm. In contrast, the anus
is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an “exit-only”
passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses
its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal
intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become
chronic. Moreover, the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating
it from blood. Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum
have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they
would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction
associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both
participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids.

Furthermore, ejaculate has components that are immunosuppressive, designed
to allow the sperm to evade the immune defenses of the female. The fragility
of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of
ejaculate, make anal-genital intercourse a most efficient manner of
transmitting HIV and other infections. Below is a list of diseases found
with extraordinary frequency among male homosexual practitioners as a result
of anal intercourse. Sexual transmission of some of these diseases is so
rare in the exclusively heterosexual population as to be virtually unknown.
Lesbians are also at higher risk for these STDs:

Anal cancer
Chlamydia trachomatis
Cryptosporidium
Giardia lamblia
Herpes simplex virus
Human immunodeficiency virus
Human papilloma virus
Isospora belli
Microsporidia
Gonorrhea
Viral hepatitis types B & C
Syphilis: gay men contracted syphilis at 3 to 4 times the rate of
heterosexuals.
HIV/AIDS: A study based upon statistics from 1986 through 1990 estimated
that 20-year-old gay men had a 50% chance of becoming HIV positive by age
55. As of June 2001, nearly 64% of men with AIDS were men who have had sex
with men.

b. Oral-anal contact (aka “rimming”):

It is because of “rimming” that intestinal parasites ordinarily found in the
tropics are encountered in the bodies of American gay men. An extremely high
rate of parasitic and other intestinal infections is documented among male
homosexual practitioners because of oral-anal contact. There are so many
infections that a syndrome called “the Gay Bowel” is described in the
medical literature. Gay bowel syndrome includes such diseases as Hepatitis
A, Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica,Epstein-Barr virus,Neisseria
meningitides,Shigellosis, Salmonellosis, Pediculosis, scabies,
Campylobacter, and typhoid.

c. Human Waste

Some gay men engage in coprophilia, which means sexual contact with
(including ingesting) highly infectious fecal wastes. This practice exposes
the participants to all of the risks of anal-oral contact and many of the
risks of analgenital contact.

d. Fisting

“Fisting” refers to the insertion of a hand or forearm into the rectum, and
is far more damaging than anal intercourse. Tears can occur, along with
incompetence of the anal sphincter. The result can include infections,
inflammation and, consequently, enhanced susceptibility to future STDs. 22%
of homosexuals (nearly 1 of every 4) in one survey admitted to having
participated in this practice.

Al Pacino and the director William Friedkin got a lot of flak from “gay
rights” activists for the 1980 movie Cruising, about an undercover cop
investigating a serial killer who targets gay men, especially those involved
in the S&M “culture.” The YouTube video below is an excerpt from the movie,
showing scenes from a gay bar. Beginning at the 0:40 mark, you’ll see a man
smearing talcum powder on his right fist and wrist, followed by another man
being fisted. If this isn’t evil, I truly don’t know what is.

e. Sadism

Sadism is the sexualization of pain and cruelty, named for the 18th Century
novelist, the Marquis de Sade. The medical consequences of such activities
range from mild to fatal, depending upon the nature of the injuries
inflicted. As many as 37% of homosexuals (more than 1 of every 3) have
practiced some form of sadism.

3. MENTAL HEALTH

Multiple studies have identified high rates of psychiatric illness,
including depression, drug abuse and suicide attempts, among selfprofessed
gays and lesbians. Gay activists argue that mental illness is induced by
other people’s homophobia and intolerance.

But that argument is undermined by an extensive study in the Netherlands — a
country of legalized same-sex marriages where GLBTs are widely accepted.The
Dutch study, published in the Archives of General Psychiatry, found a high
rate of psychiatric disease associated with same-sex sex. Gay men were much
more likely to experience major depression, bipolar disorder, panic
disorder, agoraphobia and obsessive compulsive disorder. Lesbians were more
often diagnosed with major depression, social phobia or alcohol dependence.
The researchers found “that homosexuality is not only associated with mental
health problems during adolescence and early adulthood…but also in later
life.”

Depression and drug abuse, in turn, can lead to reckless sexual behavior,
even among those who understand the deadly risks, such as older professional
gay men.

4. LIFE SPAN

The only epidemiological study (from Vancouver, Canada) to date on the life
span of gay men concluded that gay and bisexual men lose up to 20 years of
life expectancy. Compare that to cigarette smokers, who lose on average
about 13.5 years of life expectancy. The Canadian study concluded that the
probability of a 20-year-old gay or bisexual man living to 65 years was only
32%, compared to 78% for men in general.

5. MONOGAMY

Monogamy means long-term sexual fidelity. The most extensive survey of sex
in America found that a vast majority of heterosexual committed couples are
faithful: 94% of married people and 75% of cohabiting people had only one
partner in the prior year.But long-term sexual fidelity is rare among GLB
(gay, lesbian, bisexual) couples, particularly among gay males. Even during
the coupling period, many gay men do not expect monogamy. One study reported
that 66% of gay couples reported sex outside the relationship within the
first year, and nearly 90% if the relationship lasted 5 years.

The average gay or lesbian relationship is also short lived. In one study,
only 15% of gay men and 17.3% of lesbians had relationships that lasted more
than 3 years. In other words, whatever data we have show very little
long-term monogamy in GLB relationships, which then raises the question of
why homosexuals are so insistent on their “unions” being legalized as
marriages.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2013/07/04/medical-consequences-homosexual-sexual-behaviors/
Loading...