Discussion:
This is a forum called Alt.atheism not Alt.atheists
(too old to reply)
Amazing Answers
2018-03-31 21:02:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
Greywolf
2018-03-31 22:07:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________

I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.

That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.

There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not

Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.

But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.

Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.

But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
n***@pick
2018-03-31 22:11:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
Greywolf
2018-03-31 22:20:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______

Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.

So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?

If so, prove it.
Greywolf
2018-03-31 22:25:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove you're not.
And while you're at it, prove I'm NOT an atheist. If you can't, then there's no reasonable reason to doubt me. Now is there?
%
2018-03-31 22:35:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove you're not.
And while you're at it, prove I'm NOT an atheist. If you can't, then there's no reasonable reason to doubt me. Now is there?
its not my job to prove what you are not and the list would be
very large just because of all the things you are not
Greywolf
2018-03-31 23:20:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by %
Post by Greywolf
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove you're not.
And while you're at it, prove I'm NOT an atheist. If you can't, then there's no reasonable reason to doubt me. Now is there?
its not my job to prove what you are not and the list would be
very large just because of all the things you are not
______

Oh, but it is your "job" to prove I'm not an atheist--because it's *you* inferring I'm not one. So prove you're right. If you can't, there's no really reasonable reason for you to continue on with your mentally diseased-based badgering.

What has led you to have doubts in regards to my atheism? If you have nothing to say in that regard, then stop flappin' your yappers.
%
2018-03-31 23:28:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by %
Post by Greywolf
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove you're not.
And while you're at it, prove I'm NOT an atheist. If you can't, then there's no reasonable reason to doubt me. Now is there?
its not my job to prove what you are not and the list would be
very large just because of all the things you are not
______
Oh, but it is your "job" to prove I'm not an atheist--because it's *you* inferring I'm not one. So prove you're right. If you can't, there's no really reasonable reason for you to continue on with your mentally diseased-based badgering.
What has led you to have doubts in regards to my atheism? If you have nothing to say in that regard, then stop flappin' your yappers.
i never inferred anything ,
i asked you if you can prove you're an atheist ,
i have no right or wrong in this at all ,
and i'll do as i please and i'll flap what i like ,
and you'll sit there and put up with it ,
by the way can you prove your an atheist
%
2018-03-31 22:34:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove it.
prove you're an atheist
Greywolf
2018-03-31 23:13:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by %
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove it.
prove you're an atheist
__________

I'll do just that, AFTER you've proven you're not a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.

Or else, have 100 theists also challenge my claim here in this forum that I'm really an atheist.

If you can't do that, it means I've proven I'm an atheist and nothing you can say can alter that fact.

By insisting I prove I'm an atheist, you're implying that I'm not one. I'm saying I'm one and *you're* implying I'm not one, thus pointing to you being a liar.

Prove you're not lying, Cowboy. Posting "prove you're an atheist" time and again in no way proves you're not a liar. It only goes to prove you ARE a liar because you're not providing ANY evidence I'm not an atheist.

If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.

So go now, scoot. You've got a lot of theists to round up challenging my claim that I"m an atheist.

Remember: If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.

Go on, scoot!
%
2018-03-31 23:23:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by %
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove it.
prove you're an atheist
__________
I'll do just that, AFTER you've proven you're not a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
Or else, have 100 theists also challenge my claim here in this forum that I'm really an atheist.
If you can't do that, it means I've proven I'm an atheist and nothing you can say can alter that fact.
By insisting I prove I'm an atheist, you're implying that I'm not one. I'm saying I'm one and *you're* implying I'm not one, thus pointing to you being a liar.
Prove you're not lying, Cowboy. Posting "prove you're an atheist" time and again in no way proves you're not a liar. It only goes to prove you ARE a liar because you're not providing ANY evidence I'm not an atheist.
If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
So go now, scoot. You've got a lot of theists to round up challenging my claim that I"m an atheist.
Remember: If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
Go on, scoot!
i'll answer you just as soon as you answer me which you haven't done yet
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
is that enough saying it for ya ,
i'll say anything i like and ,
i won't care how i look and ,
i don't care what others think and ,
i don't care what name you call me ,
can you prove you're an atheist
Greywolf
2018-03-31 23:44:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by %
Post by Greywolf
Post by %
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove it.
prove you're an atheist
__________
I'll do just that, AFTER you've proven you're not a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
Or else, have 100 theists also challenge my claim here in this forum that I'm really an atheist.
If you can't do that, it means I've proven I'm an atheist and nothing you can say can alter that fact.
By insisting I prove I'm an atheist, you're implying that I'm not one. I'm saying I'm one and *you're* implying I'm not one, thus pointing to you being a liar.
Prove you're not lying, Cowboy. Posting "prove you're an atheist" time and again in no way proves you're not a liar. It only goes to prove you ARE a liar because you're not providing ANY evidence I'm not an atheist.
If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
So go now, scoot. You've got a lot of theists to round up challenging my claim that I"m an atheist.
Remember: If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
Go on, scoot!
i'll answer you just as soon as you answer me which you haven't done yet
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
is that enough saying it for ya ,
i'll say anything i like and ,
i won't care how i look and ,
i don't care what others think and ,
i don't care what name you call me ,
can you prove you're an atheist
____________

You seem to have forgotten that I said this precisely:

"If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job."

Thank you for verifying that. But it all fairness, it's something virtually every atheist (and even theist) knew full well.

Oh, and since your question has definitely implied doubt about my atheism, without even giving me a reason for that doubt, points to you being a liar as well. Why else broach the subject?

Since you ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job (which you've now fully acknowledge by virtue of the fact you posted what you've posted) the "prove you're an atheist" game of yours now comes to a close.

So go and play loony-tunes with someone else. You're only acting like a spoiled little child. Do you poop in your diapers as well?
%
2018-04-01 00:07:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by %
Post by Greywolf
Post by %
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove it.
prove you're an atheist
__________
I'll do just that, AFTER you've proven you're not a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
Or else, have 100 theists also challenge my claim here in this forum that I'm really an atheist.
If you can't do that, it means I've proven I'm an atheist and nothing you can say can alter that fact.
By insisting I prove I'm an atheist, you're implying that I'm not one. I'm saying I'm one and *you're* implying I'm not one, thus pointing to you being a liar.
Prove you're not lying, Cowboy. Posting "prove you're an atheist" time and again in no way proves you're not a liar. It only goes to prove you ARE a liar because you're not providing ANY evidence I'm not an atheist.
If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
So go now, scoot. You've got a lot of theists to round up challenging my claim that I"m an atheist.
Remember: If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
Go on, scoot!
i'll answer you just as soon as you answer me which you haven't done yet
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
now , prove you're an atheist
is that enough saying it for ya ,
i'll say anything i like and ,
i won't care how i look and ,
i don't care what others think and ,
i don't care what name you call me ,
can you prove you're an atheist
____________
"If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job."
Thank you for verifying that. But it all fairness, it's something virtually every atheist (and even theist) knew full well.
Oh, and since your question has definitely implied doubt about my atheism, without even giving me a reason for that doubt, points to you being a liar as well. Why else broach the subject?
Since you ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job (which you've now fully acknowledge by virtue of the fact you posted what you've posted) the "prove you're an atheist" game of yours now comes to a close.
So go and play loony-tunes with someone else. You're only acting like a spoiled little child. Do you poop in your diapers as well?
if they all know it so well ,
why do you keep repeating it ,
they don't care and nether do i ,
say anything you want call me any name you like ,
just prove you are an atheist ,
and let me add , lying to you doesn't mean i'm a liar ,
it just means i like lying to you because ,
i don't care what you think i am ,
you're opinion means nothing to me much like yourself ,
these are just toys , you and your opinions of me
hypatiab7
2018-04-02 01:36:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by %
Post by Greywolf
Post by n***@pick
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
but are you an atheist
______
Sure am. I have an atheist-based website to help prove it.
So, are you a deeply disturbed, mentally ill idiot who contributes absolutely NOTHING of intellectual value to the members of the atheist community?
If so, prove it.
prove you're an atheist
__________
I'll do just that, AFTER you've proven you're not a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
Or else, have 100 theists also challenge my claim here in this forum that I'm really an atheist.
If you can't do that, it means I've proven I'm an atheist and nothing you can say can alter that fact.
By insisting I prove I'm an atheist, you're implying that I'm not one. I'm saying I'm one and *you're* implying I'm not one, thus pointing to you being a liar.
Prove you're not lying, Cowboy. Posting "prove you're an atheist" time and again in no way proves you're not a liar. It only goes to prove you ARE a liar because you're not providing ANY evidence I'm not an atheist.
If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
So go now, scoot. You've got a lot of theists to round up challenging my claim that I"m an atheist.
Remember: If you post "prove you're an atheist," or anything remotely like that one more time, it will PROVE you really ARE a deeply disturbed, mentally ill nut-job.
Go on, scoot!
You're the one saying that we aren't atheists, therefore it's your
responsibility to provide evidence that we aren't. You've never
been able to do this. Plus, it really isn't up to you to determine
who is or isn't an atheist. That's why you always fail. Do your
'friends' in the entertainment world know that you are nothing but
a silly immature self-hating troll? They probably do. They'd laugh
you off the planet if you tried to talk to them the way you do to
us. We already do.

What planet are you posting from, John T.E. McGuinness?
MattB
2018-04-01 00:30:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT), Greywolf
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
You do have to admit those such as Duke are good at promoting atheism
as that type lie so much.
Post by Greywolf
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
They replaced that with the Discovery doctrine. If people won't
listen then steal all they have and either make slaves or kill. The
natives in the Americas would have loved it if they had followed
Matthew 10:14.
Post by Greywolf
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
Greywolf
2018-04-01 01:48:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by MattB
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT), Greywolf
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
You do have to admit those such as Duke are good at promoting atheism
as that type lie so much.
Ain't *that* the truth!
Post by MattB
Post by Greywolf
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill at least a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
They replaced that with the Discovery doctrine. If people won't
listen then steal all they have and either make slaves or kill. The
natives in the Americas would have loved it if they had followed
Matthew 10:14.
They sure would. What a con job they ended up being subjected to.
Post by MattB
Post by Greywolf
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
I.BEAT.THE.GREYWOLF
2018-04-01 01:55:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by MattB
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT), Greywolf
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
You do have to admit those such as Duke are good at promoting atheism
as that type lie so much.
Ain't *that* the truth!
Post by MattB
Post by Greywolf
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill at least a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
They replaced that with the Discovery doctrine. If people won't
listen then steal all they have and either make slaves or kill. The
natives in the Americas would have loved it if they had followed
Matthew 10:14.
They sure would. What a con job they ended up being subjected to.
Post by MattB
Post by Greywolf
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
they won't because they're wrong
MattB
2018-04-01 23:01:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 18:48:01 -0700 (PDT), Greywolf
Post by Greywolf
Post by MattB
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT), Greywolf
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
__________
I, for one, make it a point to address an earnest Christian who comes to alt.atheism wondering if their religious beliefs are based on fact or not as honorably as I can.
That's if I can detect they're truly earnest.
There's no greater reward for me than to help an "on-the-fence" Christian determine whether their religion is a false one or not
Having a sincere back-and-forth with that individual in a truly honorable way is actually a joy.
But you know damn well that the purpose of many a theist visiting alt.atheism is only to proselytize or annoy the atheist as much as possible. Then there's the truly mentally ill who feel it's their "calling' to confront atheists because of our so-called "evil" nature. And WON'T go away.
You do have to admit those such as Duke are good at promoting atheism
as that type lie so much.
Ain't *that* the truth!
Post by MattB
Post by Greywolf
Now, as to what to do with those Christians who completely ignore Matthew 10:14 and contemptuously defy their "Lord" Jesus Christ? Why call them out on it and instill at least a modicum of guilt in them for being such hypocrites.
They replaced that with the Discovery doctrine. If people won't
listen then steal all they have and either make slaves or kill. The
natives in the Americas would have loved it if they had followed
Matthew 10:14.
They sure would. What a con job they ended up being subjected to.
The Con Job is still in play. Find anything of Value on Natives land
and government will find a excuse to take it.
Post by Greywolf
Post by MattB
Post by Greywolf
But better yet, hope that our words actually "enlighten" them and get them to see how false their world-view truly is.
JTEM
2018-03-31 22:10:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism.
D.I.D., "Disassociative Personality Disorder,"
what used to be called "Multiple Personality
Disorder."

I guess the real problem is that it's only
the "Base" or so-called "Real" personality that
isn't aware of what the others are doing so,
while they're posting here, in their altered
states, they believe they are somehow "Normal."





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/172023429643
Yap Honghor
2018-03-31 23:40:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by JTEM
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism.
D.I.D., "Disassociative Personality Disorder,"
what used to be called "Multiple Personality
Disorder."
Ya, we have caught so many of the trolls with such disorder!!!!
Post by JTEM
I guess the real problem is that it's only
the "Base" or so-called "Real" personality that
isn't aware of what the others are doing so,
while they're posting here, in their altered
states, they believe they are somehow "Normal."
Troll like you are abnormal!
Post by JTEM
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/172023429643
JTEM
2018-04-01 15:11:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by JTEM
D.I.D., "Disassociative Personality Disorder,"
what used to be called "Multiple Personality
Disorder."
Ya, we
Case in point.





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/172460784928
Yap Honghor
2018-04-01 23:05:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by JTEM
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by JTEM
D.I.D., "Disassociative Personality Disorder,"
what used to be called "Multiple Personality
Disorder."
Ya, we
Case in point.
You are the case in point....
At least some trolls here would not snip out the vital words!
sheesh ranjeesh
2018-03-31 22:26:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
"And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God."

I'm guessing you won't get a lot of disagreement from the atheists on that.

SR
Gospel TT
2018-03-31 23:25:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:26:41 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things
to discus=
Post by Amazing Answers
s about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But
cons exist=
Post by Amazing Answers
. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if
some at=
Post by Amazing Answers
heist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think,
it's pe=
Post by Amazing Answers
rson who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was
started =
Post by Amazing Answers
and this person is challenged.
"And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God."
I'm guessing you won't get a lot of disagreement from the atheists on that.
SR
LOLOLOL.
Kevrob
2018-04-01 00:11:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Gospel TT
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:26:41 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 2:02:51 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things
to discus=
s about atheism.....
"And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God."
I'm guessing you won't get a lot of disagreement from the atheists
on that.
SR
LOLOLOL.
In USENET's palmier days, a newbie would lurk awhile,
read the group charter &/or FAQ, and post accordingly.
Allowances could be made for someone yet to have
acculturated himself to the group.

Trolls and spammers, and off-topic, off-charter crossposters
just out to disrupt the group can be ignored, or killfiled
by those with that facility in their newsreaders. One can engage
with them, if only to ridicule them.

Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group. Reminders to
abide by the FAQ are enforced by the person reminded, if at
all. They are a request for self-regulation. The days of
getting an ISP to ban a spammer or troll are long gone.

There seems to be a certain number of religious trolls who
interpret their faiths as allowing them to be jerks in this way.
New Testament admonitions to leave those who won't listen alone
don't cut any ice with them. Pointing out that what they are
doing is inconsistent with the Golden Rule also fails.

They are jerks first, (alleged) Christians second. I don't care
for this behavior from other types of theists any better, but the
christaholics are the most numerous and the most persistent, and
when one of them gives up, another chimes in.

[quote]

The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information

1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.

[/quote]

Point 3 of the FAQ answers the OP.

Later on it says:

[quote]

Of course, inevitably alt.atheism tends to attract the religious
looking for someone to convert. Most readers of the newsgroup don't
want to be preached to, although a few seem to derive perverse pleasure
from tearing apart particularly ill-considered or uninformed postings.

[/quote]

So, having read that, you would think a polite person would know
how to act. Alas, it isn't so.

Kevin R
Gospel TT
2018-04-01 00:16:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by Gospel TT
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:26:41 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 2:02:51 PM UTC-7, Amazing
Answers
Post by Kevrob
Post by Gospel TT
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of
things
Post by Kevrob
Post by Gospel TT
to discus=
s about atheism.....
"And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God."
I'm guessing you won't get a lot of disagreement from the
atheists
Post by Kevrob
Post by Gospel TT
on that.
SR
LOLOLOL.
In USENET's palmier days, a newbie would lurk awhile,
read the group charter &/or FAQ, and post accordingly.
Allowances could be made for someone yet to have
acculturated himself to the group.
Trolls and spammers, and off-topic, off-charter crossposters
just out to disrupt the group can be ignored, or killfiled
by those with that facility in their newsreaders. One can engage
with them, if only to ridicule them.
Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group. Reminders to
abide by the FAQ are enforced by the person reminded, if at
all. They are a request for self-regulation. The days of
getting an ISP to ban a spammer or troll are long gone.
There seems to be a certain number of religious trolls who
interpret their faiths as allowing them to be jerks in this way.
New Testament admonitions to leave those who won't listen alone
don't cut any ice with them. Pointing out that what they are
doing is inconsistent with the Golden Rule also fails.
They are jerks first, (alleged) Christians second. I don't care
for this behavior from other types of theists any better, but the
christaholics are the most numerous and the most persistent, and
when one of them gives up, another chimes in.
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some
Information
Post by Kevrob
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or
not, as long as they are not trolls.
Post by Kevrob
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of
this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
Post by Kevrob
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of
interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly
interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome.
Trolls will be treated as what they are.
Post by Kevrob
[/quote]
Point 3 of the FAQ answers the OP.
[quote]
Of course, inevitably alt.atheism tends to attract the religious
looking for someone to convert. Most readers of the newsgroup don't
want to be preached to, although a few seem to derive perverse
pleasure
Post by Kevrob
from tearing apart particularly ill-considered or uninformed
postings.
Post by Kevrob
[/quote]
So, having read that, you would think a polite person would know
how to act. Alas, it isn't so.
Kevin R
Yes, unfortunately. Thx Kevin.
%
2018-04-01 00:22:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Trolls and spammers, and off-topic, off-charter crossposters
just out to disrupt the group can be ignored, or killfiled
by those with that facility in their newsreaders. One can engage
with them, if only to ridicule them.
real polite

They are jerks first, (alleged) Christians second. I don't care
for this behavior from other types of theists any better, but the
christaholics are the most numerous and the most persistent, and
when one of them gives up, another chimes in.

real polite

Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group. Reminders to
abide by the FAQ are enforced by the person reminded, if at
all. They are a request for self-regulation. The days of
getting an ISP to ban a spammer or troll are long gone.


most of this is wrong ,

" Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group "

LOL
Kevrob
2018-04-01 00:30:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group. Reminders to
abide by the FAQ are enforced by the person reminded, if at
all. They are a request for self-regulation. The days of
getting an ISP to ban a spammer or troll are long gone.
most of this is wrong ,
" Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group "
Typing error. I should have written "UNmoderated."

With that change, it is accurate.

Kevin R
%
2018-04-01 00:34:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by Kevrob
Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group. Reminders to
abide by the FAQ are enforced by the person reminded, if at
all. They are a request for self-regulation. The days of
getting an ISP to ban a spammer or troll are long gone.
most of this is wrong ,
" Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group"
Typing error. I should have written "UNmoderated."
With that change, it is accurate.
Kevin R
its a shame you removed what i said ,
now i have to put it back again
Post by Kevrob
Trolls and spammers, and off-topic, off-charter crossposters
just out to disrupt the group can be ignored, or killfiled
by those with that facility in their newsreaders. One can engage
with them, if only to ridicule them.
real polite

They are jerks first, (alleged) Christians second. I don't care
for this behavior from other types of theists any better, but the
christaholics are the most numerous and the most persistent, and
when one of them gives up, another chimes in.

real polite

Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group. Reminders to
abide by the FAQ are enforced by the person reminded, if at
all. They are a request for self-regulation. The days of
getting an ISP to ban a spammer or troll are long gone.


most of this is wrong ,

" Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group "

LOL
Smiler
2018-04-01 02:02:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by Gospel TT
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:26:41 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 2:02:51 PM UTC-7, Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things
to discus=
s about atheism.....
"And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God."
I'm guessing you won't get a lot of disagreement from the atheists
on that.
SR
LOLOLOL.
In USENET's palmier days, a newbie would lurk awhile,
read the group charter &/or FAQ, and post accordingly.
Allowances could be made for someone yet to have acculturated himself to
the group.
Trolls and spammers, and off-topic, off-charter crossposters just out to
disrupt the group can be ignored, or killfiled by those with that
facility in their newsreaders. One can engage with them, if only to
ridicule them.
Nobody can ban anyone from a moderated group. Reminders to abide by the
FAQ are enforced by the person reminded, if at all. They are a request
for self-regulation. The days of getting an ISP to ban a spammer or
troll are long gone.
There seems to be a certain number of religious trolls who interpret
their faiths as allowing them to be jerks in this way.
New Testament admonitions to leave those who won't listen alone don't
cut any ice with them. Pointing out that what they are doing is
inconsistent with the Golden Rule also fails.
They are jerks first, (alleged) Christians second. I don't care for
this behavior from other types of theists any better, but the
christaholics are the most numerous and the most persistent, and when
one of them gives up, another chimes in.
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some
Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not,
as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this
bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest
to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly
interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome.
Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote]
Point 3 of the FAQ answers the OP.
[quote]
Of course, inevitably alt.atheism tends to attract the religious looking
for someone to convert. Most readers of the newsgroup don't want to be
preached to, although a few seem to derive perverse pleasure from
tearing apart particularly ill-considered or uninformed postings.
[/quote]
So, having read that, you would think a polite person would know how to
act. Alas, it isn't so.
A polite person would know how to act politely.
It's the impolite you are addressing there.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Yap Honghor
2018-03-31 23:38:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
Our forum is to discuss matters relating to atheism as well as any other topic. Topping the list is our desire to instill the truth that there is no pixie in this world!

Theists are welcome to listen to our views, but all too often they just reject our logical reasons or ignore the facts. If they wish just to enhance their faith, why don't they go to Alt.Religiousinsanity forum instead?
Amazing Answers
2018-03-31 23:41:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
Our forum is to discuss matters relating to atheism as well as any other topic. Topping the list is our desire to instill the truth that there is no pixie in this world!
Theists are welcome to listen to our views, but all too often they just reject our logical reasons or ignore the facts. If they wish just to enhance their faith, why don't they go to Alt.Religiousinsanity forum instead?
Why don't you go to Alt.emotionalscubaatheists forum instead?
Greywolf
2018-03-31 23:48:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
Our forum is to discuss matters relating to atheism as well as any other topic. Topping the list is our desire to instill the truth that there is no pixie in this world!
Theists are welcome to listen to our views, but all too often they just reject our logical reasons or ignore the facts. If they wish just to enhance their faith, why don't they go to Alt.Religiousinsanity forum instead?
Why don't you go to Alt.emotionalscubaatheists forum instead?
_________

So, are you here to have truly informative, reasoned debate, or only to badger atheists?
Amazing Answers
2018-03-31 23:51:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
Our forum is to discuss matters relating to atheism as well as any other topic. Topping the list is our desire to instill the truth that there is no pixie in this world!
Theists are welcome to listen to our views, but all too often they just reject our logical reasons or ignore the facts. If they wish just to enhance their faith, why don't they go to Alt.Religiousinsanity forum instead?
Why don't you go to Alt.emotionalscubaatheists forum instead?
_________
So, are you here to have truly informative, reasoned debate, or only to badger atheists?
Badger? Try humoring.
Yap Honghor
2018-04-01 23:00:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
Our forum is to discuss matters relating to atheism as well as any other topic. Topping the list is our desire to instill the truth that there is no pixie in this world!
Theists are welcome to listen to our views, but all too often they just reject our logical reasons or ignore the facts. If they wish just to enhance their faith, why don't they go to Alt.Religiousinsanity forum instead?
Why don't you go to Alt.emotionalscubaatheists forum instead?
_________
So, are you here to have truly informative, reasoned debate, or only to badger atheists?
Badger? Try humoring.
Yes, we are laughing at you donkeys most of the day....
%
2018-04-01 00:10:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
Our forum is to discuss matters relating to atheism as well as any other topic. Topping the list is our desire to instill the truth that there is no pixie in this world!
Theists are welcome to listen to our views, but all too often they just reject our logical reasons or ignore the facts. If they wish just to enhance their faith, why don't they go to Alt.Religiousinsanity forum instead?
Why don't you go to Alt.emotionalscubaatheists forum instead?
_________
So, are you here to have truly informative, reasoned debate, or only to badger atheists?
why don't you go to alt.i can't prove i'm an atheists ,
and if you have a name for god like pixie ,
then he must exist to you or there would be no name ,
unless unsurprisingly you just walk around giving ,
names to non existing things ,
thank you for proving you are not an atheist
Yap Honghor
2018-04-01 22:59:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
Our forum is to discuss matters relating to atheism as well as any other topic. Topping the list is our desire to instill the truth that there is no pixie in this world!
Theists are welcome to listen to our views, but all too often they just reject our logical reasons or ignore the facts. If they wish just to enhance their faith, why don't they go to Alt.Religiousinsanity forum instead?
Why don't you go to Alt.emotionalscubaatheists forum instead?
We are the atheists here, and we decide what forum we form.
You are the donkey species, perhaps you should gather all the donkeys to form a Alt.donkeybrain?
The Starmaker
2018-04-01 00:07:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism.
There are no gods..which is the defintion of atheism.


There is only one God.


Atheism don't believe in comic book gods, or any gods that start with a
lower cap g.


If there were two, then you spel it God's.
The Starmaker
2018-04-01 19:36:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism.
There are no gods..which is the defintion of atheism.
There is only one God.
Atheism don't believe in comic book gods, or any gods that start with a
lower cap g.
If there were two, then you spel it God's.
But everyone knows...atheist who spel God with a lower case g...it's because they fear....GOD!



So when the atheist is at Heavens gate, he tells God..."I never used a upper case g."
j***@gmail.com
2018-04-01 21:29:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism.
There are no gods..which is the defintion of atheism.
There is only one God.
Atheism don't believe in comic book gods, or any gods that start with a
lower cap g.
If there were two, then you spel it God's.
But everyone knows...atheist who spel God with a lower case g...it's because they fear....GOD!
So when the atheist is at Heavens gate, he tells God..."I never used a upper case g."
You spelled "everyone" with a lower case "e" so you're afraid of everyone.
The Starmaker
2018-04-01 22:47:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by j***@gmail.com
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism.
There are no gods..which is the defintion of atheism.
There is only one God.
Atheism don't believe in comic book gods, or any gods that start with a
lower cap g.
If there were two, then you spel it God's.
But everyone knows...atheist who spel God with a lower case g...it's because they fear....GOD!
So when the atheist is at Heavens gate, he tells God..."I never used a upper case g."
You spelled "everyone" with a lower case "e" so you're afraid of everyone.
i speled "gate" with a lower case g...i don't have any problem opeing
and closing a gate.
Smiler
2018-04-02 01:59:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Starmaker
Post by j***@gmail.com
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism.
There are no gods..which is the defintion of atheism.
There is only one God.
Atheism don't believe in comic book gods, or any gods that start
with a lower cap g.
If there were two, then you spel it God's.
But everyone knows...atheist who spel God with a lower case g...it's
because they fear....GOD!
So when the atheist is at Heavens gate, he tells God..."I never used a upper case g."
You spelled "everyone" with a lower case "e" so you're afraid of everyone.
i speled "gate" with a lower case g...i don't have any problem opeing
and closing a gate.
Prove it.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Yap Honghor
2018-04-01 23:02:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism.
There are no gods..which is the defintion of atheism.
Yes, right!
Post by The Starmaker
There is only one God.
You have said above that there is no pixie.....
Post by The Starmaker
Atheism don't believe in comic book gods, or any gods that start with a
lower cap g.
No world has a room for any fucking pixie, get this into your damaged head.
Post by The Starmaker
If there were two, then you spel it God's.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-02 08:20:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
Tim
2018-04-02 08:46:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-02 09:19:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Tim
2018-04-02 20:47:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-02 21:31:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.


https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Tim
2018-04-03 08:56:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-03 20:34:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ

YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
Yap Honghor
2018-04-04 01:47:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You did not even post your full name nor your ID.
And you forgot to list their contact ID nor phone.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
And you are not only mad, but also another stupid person, incapable to furnish contact addresses, emails or phone numbers.

What a fucking idiot who push his own problem to others.
Amazing Answers
2018-04-04 01:52:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You did not even post your full name nor your ID.
And you forgot to list their contact ID nor phone.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
And you are not only mad, but also another stupid person, incapable to furnish contact addresses, emails or phone numbers.
What a fucking idiot who push his own problem to others.
Man, your emotions are getting out of control.
Yap Honghor
2018-04-10 01:37:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You did not even post your full name nor your ID.
And you forgot to list their contact ID nor phone.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
And you are not only mad, but also another stupid person, incapable to furnish contact addresses, emails or phone numbers.
What a fucking idiot who push his own problem to others.
Man, your emotions are getting out of control.
Donkey, you can even be fair by demanding that Mad Joe post the contact of those names....

But that is because you have a donkey brain.
Amazing Answers
2018-04-10 03:07:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You did not even post your full name nor your ID.
And you forgot to list their contact ID nor phone.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
And you are not only mad, but also another stupid person, incapable to furnish contact addresses, emails or phone numbers.
What a fucking idiot who push his own problem to others.
Man, your emotions are getting out of control.
Donkey, you can even be fair by demanding that Mad Joe post the contact of those names....
But that is because you have a donkey brain.
Because it's irrelevant. And no, donkey brains cannot survive out of their body
Tim
2018-04-04 08:26:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-04 08:58:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.

_________________

Maybe his DD214 is with the evidence of the Exodus he keeps thinking he has evidence for.

The dog ate it.

He could show us, but then he'd have to kill us.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-04 10:50:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
_________________
Maybe his DD214 is with the evidence of the Exodus he keeps thinking he has evidence for.
The dog ate it.
He could show us, but then he'd have to kill us.
You are degenerate scum, not worth going to prison for.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-04 18:33:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
You are degenerate scum, not worth going to prison for.
___________________

And if you were on fire nobody would piss on you to put you out.

Let's strike a flint and see.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-10 01:23:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
_________________
Maybe his DD214 is with the evidence of the Exodus he keeps thinking he has evidence for.
The dog ate it.
He could show us, but then he'd have to kill us.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-04 10:49:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Tim
2018-04-04 20:03:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-05 02:45:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
Well, that's your opinion. With that and $5, you can buy a Coke.
Tim
2018-04-05 08:37:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
Well, that's your opinion. With that and $5, you can buy a Coke.
It's not an opinion, you stupid cunt.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-07 11:36:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
Well, that's your opinion. With that and $5, you can buy a Coke.
It's not an opinion, you stupid cunt.
If it's not an opinion, it must be a statement of fact. Since it isn't true, it must be a lie.
Tim
2018-04-07 11:55:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
Well, that's your opinion. With that and $5, you can buy a Coke.
It's not an opinion, you stupid cunt.
If it's not an opinion, it must be a statement of fact.
It is a statement of fact. You've admitted that yourself - the onus is on the person making the claim.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Since it isn't true, it must be a lie.
It is true, the onus is on you, so you are lying.
Mitchell Holman
2018-04-07 12:38:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
wrot
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 6:49:10 AM UTC-4,
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 4:34:39 PM UTC-4,
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 5:31:19 PM UTC-4,
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 5:19:14 AM UTC-4,
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 1:46:21 AM UTC-7, Tim
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 4:20:30 AM UTC-4,
vtand..
On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 2:02:51 PM
UTC-7, Am
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a
whole r
ange of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there
are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the
arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says,
"You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't
understand what the group is about and why it was started and this
person is challenged.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
If this ng were accurately named, it would be
calle
d alt.antireligion.propaganda.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
You just can't handle the fact that all the
theist dr
ivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you
aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points
out y
our stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't
defend your position.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS
cann
ot erase it.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the
nav
y, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old
shipma
tes and verify that I served with them.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy.
It
does not, liar.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsY
aBR
hBAAJ
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not
evidence
that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy
lying
sack of shit.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Well, that's your opinion. With that and $5, you can buy a Coke.
It's not an opinion, you stupid cunt.
If it's not an opinion, it must be a statement of fact. Since it isn't
true, it must be a lie.
When others are wrong it is a lie,
when YOU are wrong, on the other hand....
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-08 04:34:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
That only applies to a debate situation. I don't debate with worms.
Gospel TT
2018-04-08 06:16:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 6:49:10 AM UTC-4,
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 4:34:39 PM UTC-4,
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 5:31:19 PM UTC-4,
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 5:19:14 AM UTC-4,
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 4:20:30 AM UTC-4,
On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 2:02:51 PM
UTC-7, Amazin=
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a
whole range=
Post by Amazing Answers
of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there
are only =
Post by Amazing Answers
pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in
favor of =
Post by Amazing Answers
God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh
hail!!!" =
Post by Amazing Answers
Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is
about and=
Post by Amazing Answers
why it was started and this person is challenged.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
If this ng were accurately named, it would be
called al=
Post by Amazing Answers
t.antireligion.propaganda.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
You just can't handle the fact that all the
theist drivel=
Post by Amazing Answers
posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you
aren't able =
Post by Amazing Answers
to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points
out your =
Post by Amazing Answers
stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't
defend your =
Post by Amazing Answers
position.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS
cannot e=
Post by Amazing Answers
rase it.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the
navy, a=
Post by Amazing Answers
nd you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old
shipmates =
Post by Amazing Answers
and verify that I served with them.
Post by v***@gmail.com
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy.
It does=
Post by Amazing Answers
not, liar.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAA=
Post by Amazing Answers
J
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not
evidence tha=
Post by Amazing Answers
t you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy
lying sack=
Post by Amazing Answers
of shit.
That only applies to a debate situation. I don't debate with worms.
You need to respect your better's.
Tim
2018-04-08 07:43:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
That only applies to a debate situation.
Look at big nose trying to worm his way out, pathetic.
Post by v***@gmail.com
I don't debate with worms.
You can't debate to save your life, you worthless maggot.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-08 07:49:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
That only applies to a debate situation.
Look at big nose trying to worm his way out, pathetic.
It's all right here from the wikipedia article "Philosophical Burden of Proof"


"Holder of the burden
When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.[1] This is also stated in Hitchens's razor.

While certain kinds of arguments, such as logical syllogisms, require mathematical or strictly logical proofs, the standard for evidence to meet the burden of proof is usually determined by context and community standards and conventions.[2][3]

Philosophical debate can devolve into arguing about who has the burden of proof about a particular claim. This has been described as "burden tennis" or the "onus game".[4][5][6]"

I'm not discussing or debating anything with you, asshole.That means I don't give a shit if you believe me or not. Your opinion isn't worth shit.
Tim
2018-04-08 08:09:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
That only applies to a debate situation.
Look at big nose trying to worm his way out, pathetic.
It's all right here from the wikipedia article "Philosophical Burden of Proof"
"Holder of the burden
When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.[1] This is also stated in Hitchens's razor.
While certain kinds of arguments, such as logical syllogisms, require mathematical or strictly logical proofs, the standard for evidence to meet the burden of proof is usually determined by context and community standards and conventions.[2][3]
Philosophical debate can devolve into arguing about who has the burden of proof about a particular claim. This has been described as "burden tennis" or the "onus game".[4][5][6]"
I'm not discussing or debating anything with you, asshole.That means I don't give a shit if you believe me or not. Your opinion isn't worth shit.
It proves why I said, you lying sack of shit. You're just a spineless fucking weasel.
Gospel TT
2018-04-08 08:45:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 6:49:10 AM UTC-4,
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 4:34:39 PM UTC-4,
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 1:56:41 AM UTC-7, Tim
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 5:31:19 PM UTC-4,
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 5:19:14 AM UTC-4,
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 1:46:21 AM UTC-7,
Tim wrote=
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 4:20:30 AM UTC-4,
vtand..=
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 2:02:51 PM
UTC-7, Am=
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a
whole r=
Post by Amazing Answers
ange of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists,
there are o=
Post by Amazing Answers
nly pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments
in favor=
Post by Amazing Answers
of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt
ottuh hail!=
Post by Amazing Answers
!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group
is about=
Post by Amazing Answers
and why it was started and this person is challenged.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
If this ng were accurately named, it would
be calle=
Post by Amazing Answers
d alt.antireligion.propaganda.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
You just can't handle the fact that all the
theist dr=
Post by Amazing Answers
ivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you
aren't a=
Post by Amazing Answers
ble to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who
points out y=
Post by Amazing Answers
our stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't
defend y=
Post by Amazing Answers
our position.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
The evidence is here for others to see and all your
BS cann=
Post by Amazing Answers
ot erase it.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in
the nav=
Post by Amazing Answers
y, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my
old shipma=
Post by Amazing Answers
tes and verify that I served with them.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the
navy. It =
Post by Amazing Answers
does not, liar.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBR=
Post by Amazing Answers
hBAAJ
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not
evidence=
Post by Amazing Answers
that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you
filthy lying =
Post by Amazing Answers
sack of shit.
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
That only applies to a debate situation.
Look at big nose trying to worm his way out, pathetic.
It's all right here from the wikipedia article "Philosophical
Burden of Pro=
Post by Amazing Answers
of"
"Holder of the burden
When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the
other d=
Post by Amazing Answers
isputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of
proof to jus=
Post by Amazing Answers
tify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a
perceived s=
Post by Amazing Answers
tatus quo.[1] This is also stated in Hitchens's razor.
While certain kinds of arguments, such as logical syllogisms,
require mathe=
Post by Amazing Answers
matical or strictly logical proofs, the standard for evidence to
meet the b=
Post by Amazing Answers
urden of proof is usually determined by context and community
standards and=
Post by Amazing Answers
conventions.[2][3]
Philosophical debate can devolve into arguing about who has the
burden of p=
Post by Amazing Answers
roof about a particular claim. This has been described as "burden
tennis" o=
Post by Amazing Answers
r the "onus game".[4][5][6]"
You can't prove any of that, liar.
Post by Amazing Answers
I'm not discussing or debating anything with you, asshole.That
means I don'=
Post by Amazing Answers
t give a shit if you believe me or not. Your opinion isn't worth
shit.

You can't prove that neither, liar
Mitchell Holman
2018-04-08 12:52:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
I don't give a shit if you believe me or not.
Then why are you posting here?
Don Martin
2018-04-08 13:34:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 07:52:09 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
I don't give a shit if you believe me or not.
Then why are you posting here?
Like the proud progenitor of elevator farts, he only does it to annoy.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
duke
2018-04-08 14:17:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
That only applies to a debate situation. I don't debate with worms.
Haahaahaa. Toilet-mouth triangle, the worm. Sounds good.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Tim
2018-04-09 09:09:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by duke
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
You call anyone who disagree with you or who points out your stupidity a liar. That's because, like I said above, you can't defend your position.
The evidence is here for others to see and all your BS cannot erase it.
You claim that that list is evidence that you were in the navy, and you have the gall to call me a liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yd4oq8wc
Here is the original post. I said you can contact my old shipmates and verify that I served with them.
You said that constituted evidence that you were in the navy. It does not, liar.
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/IDXNy3HX-fY/wHsYaBRhBAAJ
YOU JUST TOLD ANOTHER FILTHY LIE
No, you did. What you posted was a wild goose chase, not evidence that you were in the navy, you lying sack of shit.
Not according to you, no. We'll see what others think about it.
Irrelevant. The onus is on you to prove your claim, you filthy lying sack of shit.
That only applies to a debate situation. I don't debate with worms.
Haahaahaa. Toilet-mouth triangle, the worm. Sounds good.
Two equations needed to describe too fat earl. You've been eating too much buckwheat, fat arse.
Amazing Answers
2018-04-02 16:35:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
"Drivel", "big nose", and "propaganda"? Sounds like you need science.
Tim
2018-04-02 20:49:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
"Drivel", "big nose", and "propaganda"? Sounds like you need science.
What does science have to do with making a judgement on a person's posts here?

You're emotional, learn some logic, and science.
Amazing Answers
2018-04-02 21:58:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Tim
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
"Drivel", "big nose", and "propaganda"? Sounds like you need science.
What does science have to do with making a judgement on a person's posts here?
You're emotional, learn some logic, and science.
You don't use it thus you rely on emotions.
Tim
2018-04-03 08:57:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
"Drivel", "big nose", and "propaganda"? Sounds like you need science.
What does science have to do with making a judgement on a person's posts here?
You're emotional, learn some logic, and science.
You don't use it thus you rely on emotions.
You're evading the question because you're emotional.
Yap Honghor
2018-04-02 23:59:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
"Drivel", "big nose", and "propaganda"? Sounds like you need science.
And science does prove that you have big and long nose?
%
2018-04-03 00:05:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Tim
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
You just can't handle the fact that all the theist drivel posted here gets debunked. You call it propaganda because you aren't able to provide any defence of your theistic drivel, big nose.
"Drivel", "big nose", and "propaganda"? Sounds like you need science.
And science does prove that you have big and long nose?
and you have a stupid flat one
Greywolf
2018-04-02 11:11:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
_________________

Read this: https://theatheistobserver.wordpress.com/2018/01/18/which-jesus-died-on-the-cross/

And then explain how it's not based in fact; how it's nothing more than "propaganda."

In case you haven't noticed, it's rebuttals in that vein that permeate this newsgroup. You theists have nothing of the sort to offer, in turn. All you people do is proclaim religious beliefs you insist are true, but provide absolutely NO irrefutable evidence for them.

So who's the *real* party guilty of spewing "propaganda"?

Oh, if you're a Christian, pay close attention to the paragraph dealing with God and the redemption of sin. I think you'll get a good kick in the pants out of it.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-02 16:19:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
_________________
Read this: https://theatheistobserver.wordpress.com/2018/01/18/which-jesus-died-on-the-cross/
And then explain how it's not based in fact; how it's nothing more than "propaganda."
In case you haven't noticed, it's rebuttals in that vein that permeate this newsgroup. You theists have nothing of the sort to offer, in turn. All you people do is proclaim religious beliefs you insist are true, but provide absolutely NO irrefutable evidence for them.
So who's the *real* party guilty of spewing "propaganda"?
Oh, if you're a Christian, pay close attention to the paragraph dealing with God and the redemption of sin. I think you'll get a good kick in the pants out of it.
What has that link got to do with my comment?NOTHING.
You just proved one of my assertions about the atheists here: You motherfuckers cannot read.
Greywolf
2018-04-02 16:46:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Greywolf
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
_________________
Read this: https://theatheistobserver.wordpress.com/2018/01/18/which-jesus-died-on-the-cross/
And then explain how it's not based in fact; how it's nothing more than "propaganda."
In case you haven't noticed, it's rebuttals in that vein that permeate this newsgroup. You theists have nothing of the sort to offer, in turn. All you people do is proclaim religious beliefs you insist are true, but provide absolutely NO irrefutable evidence for them.
So who's the *real* party guilty of spewing "propaganda"?
Oh, if you're a Christian, pay close attention to the paragraph dealing with God and the redemption of sin. I think you'll get a good kick in the pants out of it.
What has that link got to do with my comment?NOTHING.
You just proved one of my assertions about the atheists here: You motherfuckers cannot read.
_________

It sure does, Cowboy. You insinuated that this forum promotes only "propaganda." I've pointed you to an example where we atheists have provided you with *facts* and not merely propaganda.

It is *your* kind spreading religious propaganda:
_______

prop·a·gan·da
ˌpräpəˈɡandə/
noun
noun: propaganda; noun: Propaganda

1.
derogatory
information, especially of a biased or MISLEADING nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
__________________

What? Did I misread the word "propaganda"?

And hey! What did you think of the article? Really rains on your parade. Doesn't it? And based on scripture no less.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-02 17:02:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Greywolf
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
_________________
Read this: https://theatheistobserver.wordpress.com/2018/01/18/which-jesus-died-on-the-cross/
And then explain how it's not based in fact; how it's nothing more than "propaganda."
In case you haven't noticed, it's rebuttals in that vein that permeate this newsgroup. You theists have nothing of the sort to offer, in turn. All you people do is proclaim religious beliefs you insist are true, but provide absolutely NO irrefutable evidence for them.
So who's the *real* party guilty of spewing "propaganda"?
Oh, if you're a Christian, pay close attention to the paragraph dealing with God and the redemption of sin. I think you'll get a good kick in the pants out of it.
What has that link got to do with my comment?NOTHING.
You just proved one of my assertions about the atheists here: You motherfuckers cannot read.
_________
It sure does, Cowboy. You insinuated that this forum promotes only "propaganda." I've pointed you to an example where we atheists have provided you with *facts* and not merely propaganda.
_______
prop·a·gan·da
ˌpräpəˈɡandə/
noun
noun: propaganda; noun: Propaganda
1.
derogatory
information, especially of a biased or MISLEADING nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
__________________
What? Did I misread the word "propaganda"?
And hey! What did you think of the article? Really rains on your parade. Doesn't it? And based on scripture no less.
Here are some examples of atheist antireligion propaganda posted here:

The bible promotes slavery
The bible promotes polygamy
The Catholic Church does not help anybody
The Catholic Church is opposed to science
Judaism requires the killing of people who break Jewish law, such as working on the Sabbath or disobeying your parents
Moses never existed and there is no proof that he did
Jesus never existed and there is no proof that he did
There is no evidence of the exodus
Jews consider themselves superior to non-Jews
Jews proselytize
Jesus was a Christian
Hitler was a Catholic
The Nazis were Christians
Organized religion does not accept evolution

If you want more, just ask me
Greywolf
2018-04-02 17:37:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Greywolf
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Greywolf
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
_________________
Read this: https://theatheistobserver.wordpress.com/2018/01/18/which-jesus-died-on-the-cross/
And then explain how it's not based in fact; how it's nothing more than "propaganda."
In case you haven't noticed, it's rebuttals in that vein that permeate this newsgroup. You theists have nothing of the sort to offer, in turn. All you people do is proclaim religious beliefs you insist are true, but provide absolutely NO irrefutable evidence for them.
So who's the *real* party guilty of spewing "propaganda"?
Oh, if you're a Christian, pay close attention to the paragraph dealing with God and the redemption of sin. I think you'll get a good kick in the pants out of it.
What has that link got to do with my comment?NOTHING.
You just proved one of my assertions about the atheists here: You motherfuckers cannot read.
_________
It sure does, Cowboy. You insinuated that this forum promotes only "propaganda." I've pointed you to an example where we atheists have provided you with *facts* and not merely propaganda.
_______
prop·a·gan·da
ˌpräpəˈɡandə/
noun
noun: propaganda; noun: Propaganda
1.
derogatory
information, especially of a biased or MISLEADING nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
__________________
What? Did I misread the word "propaganda"?
And hey! What did you think of the article? Really rains on your parade. Doesn't it? And based on scripture no less.
The bible promotes slavery
The bible promotes polygamy
The Catholic Church does not help anybody
The Catholic Church is opposed to science
Judaism requires the killing of people who break Jewish law, such as working on the Sabbath or disobeying your parents
Moses never existed and there is no proof that he did
Jesus never existed and there is no proof that he did
There is no evidence of the exodus
Jews consider themselves superior to non-Jews
Jews proselytize
Jesus was a Christian
Hitler was a Catholic
The Nazis were Christians
Organized religion does not accept evolution
If you want more, just ask me
_________________

Boy, oh boy! Have *you* ever opened up yourself to successful rebuttal.

But I digress. You assaulted me because you felt that my response had nothing to do with your comment. When in fact, it did.

Than you stupidly claim we "motherfuckers" can't read. Really. Atheist cannot read? Do you have the slightest idea as to how retarded that makes you look?

As for your list, if you were right when challenging any claim you felt was in error, good for you! That's what's *supposed* to happen in a back-and-forth.

But you have to actually *be* in the right, and not just "claim" you are right.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-02 21:28:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Greywolf
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Greywolf
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
_________________
Read this: https://theatheistobserver.wordpress.com/2018/01/18/which-jesus-died-on-the-cross/
And then explain how it's not based in fact; how it's nothing more than "propaganda."
In case you haven't noticed, it's rebuttals in that vein that permeate this newsgroup. You theists have nothing of the sort to offer, in turn. All you people do is proclaim religious beliefs you insist are true, but provide absolutely NO irrefutable evidence for them.
So who's the *real* party guilty of spewing "propaganda"?
Oh, if you're a Christian, pay close attention to the paragraph dealing with God and the redemption of sin. I think you'll get a good kick in the pants out of it.
What has that link got to do with my comment?NOTHING.
You just proved one of my assertions about the atheists here: You motherfuckers cannot read.
_________
It sure does, Cowboy. You insinuated that this forum promotes only "propaganda." I've pointed you to an example where we atheists have provided you with *facts* and not merely propaganda.
_______
prop·a·gan·da
ˌpräpəˈɡandə/
noun
noun: propaganda; noun: Propaganda
1.
derogatory
information, especially of a biased or MISLEADING nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
__________________
What? Did I misread the word "propaganda"?
And hey! What did you think of the article? Really rains on your parade. Doesn't it? And based on scripture no less.
The bible promotes slavery
The bible promotes polygamy
The Catholic Church does not help anybody
The Catholic Church is opposed to science
Judaism requires the killing of people who break Jewish law, such as working on the Sabbath or disobeying your parents
Moses never existed and there is no proof that he did
Jesus never existed and there is no proof that he did
There is no evidence of the exodus
Jews consider themselves superior to non-Jews
Jews proselytize
Jesus was a Christian
Hitler was a Catholic
The Nazis were Christians
Organized religion does not accept evolution
If you want more, just ask me
_________________
Boy, oh boy! Have *you* ever opened up yourself to successful rebuttal.
But I digress. You assaulted me because you felt that my response had nothing to do with your comment. When in fact, it did.
Than you stupidly claim we "motherfuckers" can't read. Really. Atheist cannot read? Do you have the slightest idea as to how retarded that makes you look?
As for your list, if you were right when challenging any claim you felt was in error, good for you! That's what's *supposed* to happen in a back-and-forth.
But you have to actually *be* in the right, and not just "claim" you are right.
Each one of these lies has been posted and debunked by me on this ng over the past 10 years.
I'm not going to repost any of it. LOOK IN THE ARCHIVES, LAZY ASSHOLE.
Mitchell Holman
2018-04-02 22:43:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
If you can't handle "antireligion propaganda"
why are you hanging around in an atheism group?
Post by v***@gmail.com
The bible promotes slavery
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
The bible promotes polygamy
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Catholic Church does not help anybody
It helps itself.
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Catholic Church is opposed to science
In times past, true.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Judaism requires the killing of people who break Jewish law, such as
working on the Sabbath or disobeying your parents
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Moses never existed
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
There is no evidence of the exodus
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Hitler was a Catholic
He was a Christian, true enough
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Nazis were Christians
True.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-03 00:51:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
If you can't handle "antireligion propaganda"
why are you hanging around in an atheism group?
Post by v***@gmail.com
The bible promotes slavery
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
The bible promotes polygamy
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Catholic Church does not help anybody
It helps itself.
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Catholic Church is opposed to science
In times past, true.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Judaism requires the killing of people who break Jewish law, such as
working on the Sabbath or disobeying your parents
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Moses never existed
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
There is no evidence of the exodus
True.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Hitler was a Catholic
He was a Christian, true enough
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Nazis were Christians
True.
The bible promotes slavery
True.
No. It regulates an existing practice without endorsing it. There is no passage that says "slavery is good."
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
The bible promotes polygamy
True.
WRONG. There is a Jewish principle of Halaka which affirms that the legal code of the country takes precedent over Jewish law in case of any conflict. Polygamy and slavery are illegal in Europe and the USA, which means Jews are not allowed to do either.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Catholic Church does not help anybody
It helps itself.
Liar I already posted a list of Catholic charities, hospitals and schools.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Catholic Church is opposed to science
In times past, true.
EVIDENCE????
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
Judaism requires the killing of people who break Jewish law, such as
working on the Sabbath or disobeying your parents
True.
WRONG. There is a Jewish principle of Halaka which affirms that the legal code of the country takes precedent over Jewish law in case of any conflict. Polygamy and slavery and murder are illegal in Europe and the USA, which means Jews are not allowed to do either.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
Moses never existed
True.
Liar. I've posted the evidence more than 20 times
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
There is no evidence of the exodus
True.
Liar. I've posted the evidence more than 20 times
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
Hitler was a Catholic
He was a Christian, true enough
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Nazis were Christians
True.
Is that why they persecuted Christian churches, idiot?

I should not have taken your comments seriously since I've caught you lying so many times. You will never tell the truth. I know that now.
Mitchell Holman
2018-04-03 03:05:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Mitchell Holman
If you can't handle "antireligion propaganda"
why are you hanging around in an atheism group?
Well?
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Mitchell Holman
The bible promotes slavery
True.
No. It regulates an existing practice without endorsing it. There is
no passage that says "slavery is good."
Funny that the Ten Commandments bans
learing at your neighbor but says nothing
against buy her daughter as a slave and then
beating her to death, no?
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
The bible promotes polygamy
True.
WRONG. There is a Jewish principle of Halaka which affirms that the
legal code of the country takes precedent over Jewish law in case of
any conflict. Polygamy and slavery are illegal in Europe and the USA,
which means Jews are not allowed to do either.
Jewish law REQUIRED polygamy, remember?


In Deuteronomy 25:5 if a woman's husband dies, and she
didn't have any kids from him, then she must marry his
brother regardless whether he had a wife or not.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
Judaism requires the killing of people who break Jewish law, such
as working on the Sabbath or disobeying your parents
True.
WRONG.
Death for Hitting Dad

Whoever strikes his father or mother shall be put
to death. (Exodus 21:15 NAB)


Death for Cursing Parents

All who curse their father or mother must be put to
death. They are guilty of a capital offense.
(Leviticus 20:9 NLT)


Death for Adultery

If a man commits adultery with another man's wife,
both the man and the woman must be put to death.
(Leviticus 20:10 NLT)


Death for Fornication

A priest's daughter who loses her honor by committing
fornication and thereby dishonors her father also, shall
be burned to death. (Leviticus 21:9 NAB)


Death for Unruly son

And they shall say unto the elders of
his city, This our son is stubborn and
rebellious, he will not obey our voice;
he is a glutton, and a drunkard. And
all the men of his city shall stone him
with stones, that he die
Deuteronomy 21:18


Death to Followers of Other Religions

Whoever sacrifices to any god, except the Lord alone,
shall be doomed. (Exodus 22:19 NAB)
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
Moses never existed
True.
Liar. I've posted the evidence more than 20 times
There is no proof that Moses ever existed.




1 Jan 8, 2012
ARCHEOLOGISTS AGREE: MOSES NEVER EXISTED.


The Torah is obvious mythology. The fact that it is
fiction is obvious from Book 1, Page 1. The Earth is
not 4000 years old. Cultures (unknown to the scribes)
flourished much before. Written records and archeological
evidence using carbon dating show man's presence tens
of thousands of years ago, probably over a 100,000 years
ago. A million people cannot live in a vast desert
(without water or food) in a hostile nation for 40 years-
-and leave no trace.

Furthermore, archaelogical and historical evidence has
proven Moses, Exodus, Abraham, Joshua, King David, etc.
to be basically myths copied from African and Eastern/
Middle Eastern cultures.

For eg., according to Prof. Ze'ev Herzog who teaches
in the Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern
Studies at Tel Aviv University, in "Deconstructing the
Walls of Jericho", states as follows:

"This is what archaeologists have learned from their
excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were
never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not
conquer the land in a military campaign and did not
pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel. Perhaps even
harder to swallow is the fact that the united monarchy
of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible
as a regional power, was at most a small tribal kingdom.
..... Most of those who are engaged in scientific work
in the interlocking spheres of the Bible, archaeology
and the history of the Jewish people - and who once went
into the field looking for proof to corroborate the Bible
story - now agree that the historic events relating to
the stages of the Jewish people's emergence are radically
different from what that story tells." (in an article in
the Jewish magazine Haaretz, as republished on):

http://tinyurl.com/q2sxvmp
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
There is no evidence of the exodus
True.
Liar. I've posted the evidence more than 20 times
Even Jewish historians have given up looking
for proof of Ye Exodus. It isn't there.

In fact the whole notion of 2 million people
spending 40 years in the Sinai and not leaving
behind a single grave or well or campfire or
road is just preposterous.
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
Hitler was a Catholic
He was a Christian, true enough
Post by v***@gmail.com
The Nazis were Christians
True.
Is that why they persecuted Christian churches, idiot?
What religion did you think the Nazi
troops were raised in? Islam? Hinduism?
Of course they were Christian.
Yap Honghor
2018-04-02 23:57:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
When all the religions are scams, sane human like us have to be the men standing firm against the cons.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-03 00:53:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
When all the religions are scams, sane human like us have to be the men standing firm against the cons.
You can't know if they are scams or not since you can't read.
Yap Honghor
2018-04-03 08:39:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
When all the religions are scams, sane human like us have to be the men standing firm against the cons.
You can't know if they are scams or not since you can't read.
I can know...from following 2 vital facts:
#1. Religion needs the support of money, in the form of tithes or donation.
#2. Religion con people, with such promises as salvation and heaven which are not only stupid but unable to show proof of benefits.

So, if they are not scams, what are they?
hypatiab7
2018-04-08 07:22:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
That would be due to the religious crap you post here against our newsgroup FAQ/Charter.
duke
2018-04-08 14:20:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
That would be due to the religious crap you post here against our newsgroup FAQ/Charter.
You just don't get it that we are presenting truth to those of you that hide
from truth. We're not p-wording trying to get you to see anything but an
understanding of truth as opposed to your false beliefs about truth.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Greywolf
2018-04-09 01:53:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by duke
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
That would be due to the religious crap you post here against our newsgroup FAQ/Charter.
You just don't get it that we are presenting truth to those of you that hide
from truth.
Hiding from the *truth8! Haven't you noticed that you all insist there really is a God but couldn't prove it to save your very lives; that not a single human being in Man's entire history has provided irrefutable proof for the existence of your (truly imaginary) Gods?

How can you accuse *us* of "hiding from the truth when you've provided absolutely NO irrefutable evidence for *your* so-called "truth"?

Explain that one, diarrhea brain.

Where have you found irrefutable evidence our non-belief in your imaginary, make-believe God is false? In fact, your God is non-existent as well.

Think not? Well, simply prove it.

Why not pray to your God to provide you with the supernatural strength to prove He's actually real? C'mon, that shouldn't be too hard for a God to do for you now, would it? Just put a little more *ooomph* in your prayer when you pray for this one. That should most certainly do the trick. Don't you think?

You wouldn't even *think* your God doesn't answer prayers, would you?

We're not p-wording trying to get you to see anything but an
Post by duke
understanding of truth as opposed to your false beliefs about truth.
You want "truth," do you? Well here's a truth for you: You're spittin' in your Lord Jesus Christ's face by defying Him and disregarding Matthew 10:14. And that's a fact. Any rational person would see that the underlying message there is that his disciples are MOT to preach where neither they nor their message is wanted.

Seeing how you so blithely ignore and defy His command leads me to suspect you give jack-squat about what He has to say--as long as you can talk stupid in alt.atheism.

Now am I right, or am I right?
Post by duke
the dukester, American-American
Your nonsense aside, When did you become truly nuts, duke? At birth, or when you first realized you were mentally retarded?
duke
2018-04-09 12:27:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greywolf
Post by duke
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God. So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
If this ng were accurately named, it would be called alt.antireligion.propaganda.
That would be due to the religious crap you post here against our newsgroup FAQ/Charter.
You just don't get it that we are presenting truth to those of you that hide
from truth.
Hiding from the *truth8! Haven't you noticed that you all insist there really is a God
We believe. The evidence is beyond disbelief.
Post by Greywolf
How can you accuse *us* of "hiding from the truth when you've provided absolutely NO irrefutable evidence for *your* so-called "truth"?
There is truth to be accepted. You refuse.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Kevrob
2018-04-09 12:12:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God.
That particular one is off-charter. It is specifically what the
group is NOT for. Your insistence on it is what marks you as a
troll, here.

There are cons, and they get discussed here. On-charter, on-topic
problems include developing a philosophical basis for personal
morality, interpersonal relationships that suffer friction from
believing relatives and friends, secularism v the impulse in some
believers to have government promote religion, whether over-reliance
on government in the absence of religious structures is a danger,
and others. More are in the FAQ.
Post by Amazing Answers
So if some atheist comes around and says, "You ghayt ottuh hail!!!" Just think, it's person who doesn't understand what the group is about and why it was started and this person is challenged.
That's a disingenuous version of events, and if you don't know
that you are being willfully ignorant on the matter, which is
more troll behavior.

Kevin R
duke
2018-04-09 12:28:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by Amazing Answers
Meaning you discuss atheism. There are a whole range of things to discuss about atheism. According to atheists, there are only pros. But cons exist. And the con happens to be the arguments in favor of God.
That particular one is off-charter. It is specifically what the
group is NOT for. Your insistence on it is what marks you as a
troll, here.
We seek your truth as we offer you our truth.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Loading...