Discussion:
The U.K. is outlawing alt altheism!
(too old to reply)
JTEM
2014-10-19 23:21:55 UTC
Permalink
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
and the collective:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/

"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"

Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!



-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/
Paul
2014-10-20 00:15:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
You look worried. :-D
JTEM
2014-10-20 02:49:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul
You look worried. :-D
I guess that means you're a stalker :-D



-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/31958185600
Tim
2014-10-20 07:45:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
You look worried. :-D
I guess that means you're a stalker :-D
No, it means that you're a troll, and a kook.
JTEM
2014-10-20 15:26:05 UTC
Permalink
"They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
You demonstrate just how little we're talking
about, and how dangerous that is."

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/99617340518
Paul
2014-10-20 16:54:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
You look worried. :-D
I guess that means you're a stalker :-D
No, it means that you're a troll, and a kook.
We hold these truths to be self-evident.
JTEM
2014-10-20 19:18:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul
We hold these truths to be self-evident.
Someone just confessed to a multiple personality
disorder...



-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/100513175023
Paul
2014-10-21 17:01:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
We hold these truths to be self-evident.
Someone just confessed to a multiple personality
disorder...
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
JTEM
2014-10-22 03:57:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension? Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.



-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/100511179283
Paul
2014-10-22 13:42:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Smiler
2014-10-22 23:36:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Neither is any other subject.
--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
JTEM
2014-11-22 07:29:53 UTC
Permalink
Please ask the nurse to wheel you outside
for a while. The stale air is clearly
taking it's toll.



-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/102982257268
Christopher A. Lee
2014-10-22 23:46:24 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
Joe Bruno
2014-11-22 08:00:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
SPEAKING OF TROLLS, HERE'S CHRISSY, WHO DOES NOTHING BUT CALL PEOPLE
"LIAR" AND "MORON" AND "PSYCHOPATH" AND "MAD".

If the law goes into affect, rest assured I will file a complaint on YOU.
Tart Andy
2014-11-22 08:48:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
SPEAKING OF TROLLS, HERE'S CHRISSY, WHO DOES NOTHING BUT CALL PEOPLE
"LIAR" AND "MORON" AND "PSYCHOPATH" AND "MAD".
If the law goes into affect, rest assured I will file a complaint on YOU.
If you attempt that with the same levels of competence that you exhibit
in this froup, you'll wind up having yourself prosecuted for parking a
blimp without due care and attention.

Tart
--
Clip-Clop Joey Boy, and yes, this is still funny:

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/0f98dc6df90fa04c
Oxyaena
2014-11-22 14:09:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
SPEAKING OF TROLLS, HERE'S CHRISSY, WHO DOES NOTHING BUT CALL PEOPLE
"LIAR" AND "MORON" AND "PSYCHOPATH" AND "MAD".
If the law goes into affect, rest assured I will file a complaint on YOU.
OH, GOODY! THAT MEANS I CAN FILE A COMPLAINT ON YOU AND YOUR GANG OF
TROLLS. I LOVE THIS NEW LAW!
--
--- Lord Creodont, FRCS
Christopher A. Lee
2014-11-22 15:04:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Oxyaena
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
SPEAKING OF TROLLS, HERE'S CHRISSY, WHO DOES NOTHING BUT CALL PEOPLE
"LIAR" AND "MORON" AND "PSYCHOPATH" AND "MAD".
Only when they are those things.

The trolls _are_ mentally ill because normal people don't act that
way.

He lies when he accuses atheists in an atheist group of being trolls -
we don't crash other groups where we are neither wanted nor needed,
with unprovoked attacks on their subscribers.

It takes a psychopathic personality to do that. Particularly when they
resort to personal lies to generate a reaction.

As well as being a coward hiding behind the anonymity of his computer
keyboard to perform what would be a hate crime if he did it to pretty
well any other minority.

He's so paranoid, he's accused the group of being a honey trap to lure
theists in so they can be attacked.

In spite of...

From the alt.atheism FAQ at
http://www.skepticfiles.org/atheist/atheistf.htm

What is the purpose of the alt.atheism newsgroup?

"Why have a newsgroup about atheism? Why do atheists organize in
groups? What is there to discuss?"

Many things are discussed in alt.atheism, including:
* Whether it is reasonable to pretend to be religious in order to
avoid upsetting one's family
* Prayer in schools
* Discrimination against atheists
* Sunday trading laws
* The Satanic Child Abuse myth
* Whether one should be an overt atheist or 'stay in the closet'
* How religious societies prey (sic) on new college students
* How to get rid of unwanted proselytizers
* Whether religion is a danger to society and/or the individual
* Why people become atheists

Of course, inevitably alt.atheism tends to attract evangelical
Christians looking for someone to convert. Most readers of the
newsgroup don't want to be preached to, although a few seem to
derive perverse pleasure from tearing apart particularly
ill-considered or uninformed postings.

Theist trolls like him simply reap what they sow.

Especially when they accuse us of their own behaviour.

And Mad Joe is _seriously_ mentally ill, over and above most trolls.
Post by Oxyaena
Post by Joe Bruno
If the law goes into affect, rest assured I will file a complaint on YOU.
OH, GOODY! THAT MEANS I CAN FILE A COMPLAINT ON YOU AND YOUR GANG OF
TROLLS. I LOVE THIS NEW LAW!
He was being his usual stupid, dishonest self.
Christopher A. Lee
2014-11-22 15:26:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Oxyaena
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
SPEAKING OF TROLLS, HERE'S CHRISSY, WHO DOES NOTHING BUT CALL PEOPLE
"LIAR" AND "MORON" AND "PSYCHOPATH" AND "MAD".
If the law goes into affect, rest assured I will file a complaint on YOU.
OH, GOODY! THAT MEANS I CAN FILE A COMPLAINT ON YOU AND YOUR GANG OF
TROLLS. I LOVE THIS NEW LAW!
He was reopening an old thread with a deliberately nasty response to a
month-old post.
hypatiab7
2014-11-24 15:44:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
SPEAKING OF TROLLS, HERE'S CHRISSY, WHO DOES NOTHING BUT CALL PEOPLE
"LIAR" AND "MORON" AND "PSYCHOPATH" AND "MAD".
If the law goes into affect, rest assured I will file a complaint on YOU.
And here's Art Tandy nym Joe Bruno who has been stalking Christopher Lee
and unsuccessfully has been pulling up bits of his posting history to
prove him a liar. The only liar here is Art Tandy.
Joe Bruno
2014-11-24 19:47:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
SPEAKING OF TROLLS, HERE'S CHRISSY, WHO DOES NOTHING BUT CALL PEOPLE
"LIAR" AND "MORON" AND "PSYCHOPATH" AND "MAD".
If the law goes into affect, rest assured I will file a complaint on YOU.
And here's Art Tandy nym Joe Bruno who has been stalking Christopher Lee
and unsuccessfully has been pulling up bits of his posting history to
prove him a liar. The only liar here is Art Tandy.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.atheism/Lee$2C$20lie$2C$20chronicle%7Csort:date/alt.atheism/xthBwNZnb4Q/g-g3r7Eu4I0J
Tim
2014-11-24 20:19:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
SPEAKING OF TROLLS, HERE'S CHRISSY, WHO DOES NOTHING BUT CALL PEOPLE
"LIAR" AND "MORON" AND "PSYCHOPATH" AND "MAD".
If the law goes into affect, rest assured I will file a complaint on YOU.
And here's Art Tandy nym Joe Bruno who has been stalking Christopher Lee
and unsuccessfully has been pulling up bits of his posting history to
prove him a liar. The only liar here is Art Tandy.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.atheism/Lee$2C$20lie$2C$20chronicle%7Csort:date/alt.atheism/xthBwNZnb4Q/g-g3r7Eu4I0J
bruno the retard still doesn't know how to make a url link, snicker!
Paul
2014-11-24 16:15:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
SPEAKING OF TROLLS, HERE'S CHRISSY, WHO DOES NOTHING BUT CALL PEOPLE
"LIAR" AND "MORON" AND "PSYCHOPATH" AND "MAD".
Only when it's appropriate.
Paul
2014-11-24 16:13:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Paul
Post by Paul
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
And you advertised yourself as a criminal. Cheers.
Now, come on, what did I say about your lack of
reading comprehension?
There goes another irony meter shot to hell.
Post by JTEM
Well? I said that it
does not an argument make! And this would be an
example of that.
Obviously logic is not your strong suit.
Or anything else.
Indeed. He's the monkey who runs around his cage throwing his poo at the amused onlookers.
Joe Bruno
2014-11-22 07:56:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
You look worried. :-D
I guess that means you're a stalker :-D
No, it means that you're a troll, and a kook.
Look who's talking. You never discuss anything. You just harrass people.
Tim
2014-11-22 11:00:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Tim
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
You look worried. :-D
I guess that means you're a stalker :-D
No, it means that you're a troll, and a kook.
Look who's talking. You never discuss anything. You just harrass people.
You and that idiot jtem are too stupid to discuss anything. You're both
trolls and get the contempt you deserve. You're so stupid you post articles
that contradict the point you tried to make, idiot.
hypatiab7
2014-11-24 15:46:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Tim
Post by JTEM
Post by Paul
You look worried. :-D
I guess that means you're a stalker :-D
No, it means that you're a troll, and a kook.
Look who's talking. You never discuss anything. You just harrass people.
Talking about yourself Artie Joe?
h***@gmail.com
2014-10-21 04:19:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
Perhaps JTEM cannot read....the article says trolling.
With your inane post defining trolling, you may face criminal charges.

But to touch on aa? You can dream on....UK is not a fascist nation and it will have to consult its big brother the US.
Post by JTEM
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/
JTEM
2014-10-21 11:18:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@gmail.com
Perhaps JTEM cannot read....
In a group without reading comprehension, those who
can understand the words are freaks...



-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/100552806198
h***@gmail.com
2014-10-22 06:15:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
Post by h***@gmail.com
Perhaps JTEM cannot read....
In a group without reading comprehension, those who
can understand the words are freaks...
So, you are admitted having no reading comprehension and therefore snip...
Post by JTEM
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/100552806198
Joe Bruno
2014-11-22 07:57:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
Perhaps JTEM cannot read....the article says trolling.
With your inane post defining trolling, you may face criminal charges.
YOU ARE THE WORST TROLL ON AA.
Post by h***@gmail.com
But to touch on aa? You can dream on....UK is not a fascist nation and it will have to consult its big brother the US.
What nonsense. UK has it's own laws.
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by JTEM
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/
Malcolm McMahon
2014-10-21 15:23:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
Well, just as well this "collective" is a figment of your imagination then.


But seriously, I think it's one of those legal changes made to placate the Daily Mail, and which we'll all come to regret. That's because it seeks to prevent something that can't be given a bulletproof legal definition.

Its about as well thought through as the notorious "Dangerous Dogs Act".

This is all about teenagers and celebrities who get nastygrams from childish people and, in some cases, are so thin-skinned as to kill themselves.

As a general rule I'd say that people that thin-skinned have no business being on the Internet but I guess the Internet is mandatory for today's teenagers.

And some of this stuff is genuinely threatening.

The trouble is it's all very subjective. Like censorship generally, it pretends that its about suppressing something well-defined, but has a chilling effect on all free expression without solving the problem.
c***@gmail.com
2014-10-22 16:32:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
Obviously, you don't know the meaning of the word "troll". Who are the trolls: atheists who write to a discussion forum on atheism or pseudo-theists, racists and antisemites who send crap just to offend people?

What will you turn to if you get caught?
Christopher A. Lee
2014-10-22 16:43:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by c***@gmail.com
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
Obviously, you don't know the meaning of the word "troll". Who are
the trolls: atheists who write to a discussion forum on atheism or
pseudo-theists, racists and antisemites who send crap just to offend
people?
What will you turn to if you get caught?
He'll be Bubba's bitch for two years.
hypatiab7
2014-10-22 20:12:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by c***@gmail.com
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass legislation which criminalizes
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
Obviously, you don't know the meaning of the word "troll". Who are
the trolls: atheists who write to a discussion forum on atheism or
pseudo-theists, racists and antisemites who send crap just to offend
people?
What will you turn to if you get caught?
He'll be Bubba's bitch for two years.
You'd think by now that Bubba would have better taste.
Smiler
2014-10-22 23:40:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by c***@gmail.com
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass legislation which
criminalizes
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-
sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by c***@gmail.com
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
Obviously, you don't know the meaning of the word "troll". Who are the
trolls: atheists who write to a discussion forum on atheism or
pseudo-theists, racists and antisemites who send crap just to offend
people?
What will you turn to if you get caught?
He'll be Bubba's bitch for two years.
You'd think by now that Bubba would have better taste.
I don't think Bubba will be the one doing the 'tasting'.
--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
Joe Bruno
2014-11-22 07:53:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
The questions are

1)Will it apply to USENET newsgroups and

2)Will it apply to posters outside of the UK?
I don't think Britain has any jurisdiction over people outside the UK. It may apply only to social media like twitter and facebook.
Marvin Sebourn
2014-11-23 05:28:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect (England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this already. From your link "That is why we are determined to quadruple the current six-month sentence."

Current.

Marvin Sebourn
***@aol.com
Dakota
2014-11-23 05:57:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect (England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this already. From your link "That is why we are determined to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
Joe Bruno
2014-11-23 06:22:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dakota
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect
(England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this
already. From your link "That is why we are determined
to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
In any case, the malicious communication is from the trolls who crash
the group, not the regulars they attack.
ROTFL! It applies to anyone who stalks or harrasses anyone else on the internet. What a jackass you are.
Joe Bruno
2014-11-23 06:34:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Dakota
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect
(England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this
already. From your link "That is why we are determined
to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
In any case, the malicious communication is from the trolls who crash
the group, not the regulars they attack.
ROTFL! It applies to anyone who stalks or harrasses anyone else on the internet. What a jackass you are.
Here it is:

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/27
h***@gmail.com
2014-11-24 06:02:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Dakota
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect
(England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this
already. From your link "That is why we are determined
to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
In any case, the malicious communication is from the trolls who crash
the group, not the regulars they attack.
ROTFL! It applies to anyone who stalks or harrasses anyone else on the internet. What a jackass you are.
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like you, or harass you for your nonsense.
Christopher A. Lee
2014-11-24 07:06:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Dakota
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect
(England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this
already. From your link "That is why we are determined
to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
In any case, the malicious communication is from the trolls who crash
the group, not the regulars they attack.
ROTFL! It applies to anyone who stalks or harrasses anyone else
on the internet. What a jackass you are.
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like you,
or harass you for your nonsense.
Mad Joe lies that reaping what he sows when he obsessively religiously
harasses those he hates where they hang out, is "stalking and
harassing _him_".

And he wonders why we know just how mentally ill he is.
Joe Bruno
2014-11-24 08:07:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Dakota
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect
(England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this
already. From your link "That is why we are determined
to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
In any case, the malicious communication is from the trolls who crash
the group, not the regulars they attack.
ROTFL! It applies to anyone who stalks or harrasses anyone else
on the internet. What a jackass you are.
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like you,
or harass you for your nonsense.
Not according to to Malicious Communications Act.
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Mad Joe lies that reaping what he sows when he obsessively religiously
harasses those he hates where they hang out, is "stalking and
harassing _him_".
Time will tell.
.
h***@gmail.com
2014-11-25 11:06:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by h***@gmail.com
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Dakota
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect
(England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this
already. From your link "That is why we are determined
to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
In any case, the malicious communication is from the trolls who crash
the group, not the regulars they attack.
ROTFL! It applies to anyone who stalks or harrasses anyone else
on the internet. What a jackass you are.
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like you,
or harass you for your nonsense.
Not according to to Malicious Communications Act.
If we cannot according to the act, then you will be charged according to the Act.
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Mad Joe lies that reaping what he sows when he obsessively religiously
harasses those he hates where they hang out, is "stalking and
harassing _him_".
Time will tell.
Time has already found you guilty of spreading religious bullshits and you are being punished for your stupidity.
Post by Joe Bruno
.
Don Martin
2014-11-24 14:27:03 UTC
Permalink
<snip>
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by h***@gmail.com
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like you,
or harass you for your nonsense.
Mad Joe lies that reaping what he sows
I thought he lied about raping sows, but perhaps I misunderstood.

when he obsessively religiously
Post by Christopher A. Lee
harasses those he hates where they hang out, is "stalking and
harassing _him_".
And he wonders why we know just how mentally ill he is.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
Tim
2014-11-24 14:33:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Martin
<snip>
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by h***@gmail.com
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like you,
or harass you for your nonsense.
Mad Joe lies that reaping what he sows
I thought he lied about raping sows, but perhaps I misunderstood.
His mom consented, so technically it was incest, not rape. Only later did it
turn into necrophilia.
%
2014-11-24 15:06:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim
Post by Don Martin
<snip>
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by h***@gmail.com
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like you,
or harass you for your nonsense.
Mad Joe lies that reaping what he sows
I thought he lied about raping sows, but perhaps I misunderstood.
His mom consented, so technically it was incest, not rape. Only later
did it turn into necrophilia.
do you ever talk about anything besides sexual incest deviances
Tim
2014-11-24 15:30:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Tim
Post by Don Martin
<snip>
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by h***@gmail.com
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like you,
or harass you for your nonsense.
Mad Joe lies that reaping what he sows
I thought he lied about raping sows, but perhaps I misunderstood.
His mom consented, so technically it was incest, not rape. Only later
did it turn into necrophilia.
do you ever talk about anything besides sexual incest deviances
Sure, whenever I talk about your sexual relations with your mom I'm talking
about bestiality, fluffer gimp. Do you ever make grammatical sentences,
fluffer gimp?
%
2014-11-24 16:33:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim
Post by %
Post by Tim
Post by Don Martin
<snip>
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by h***@gmail.com
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like you,
or harass you for your nonsense.
Mad Joe lies that reaping what he sows
I thought he lied about raping sows, but perhaps I misunderstood.
His mom consented, so technically it was incest, not rape. Only
later did it turn into necrophilia.
do you ever talk about anything besides sexual incest deviances
Sure, whenever I talk about your sexual relations with your mom I'm
talking about bestiality, fluffer gimp. Do you ever make grammatical
sentences, fluffer gimp?
thank you for clearing that up for me ,
i knew i could count on you for ,
a reliable well thought out intelligent answer
Tim
2014-11-24 16:49:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Tim
Post by %
do you ever talk about anything besides sexual incest deviances
Sure, whenever I talk about your sexual relations with your mom I'm
talking about bestiality, fluffer gimp. Do you ever make grammatical
sentences, fluffer gimp?
thank you for clearing that up for me ,
i knew i could count on you for ,
a reliable well thought out intelligent answer
And thanks to you for answering no to my second question, illiterate fluffer
gimp.
%
2014-11-24 19:42:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim
Post by %
Post by Tim
Post by %
do you ever talk about anything besides sexual incest deviances
Sure, whenever I talk about your sexual relations with your mom I'm
talking about bestiality, fluffer gimp. Do you ever make grammatical
sentences, fluffer gimp?
thank you for clearing that up for me ,
i knew i could count on you for ,
a reliable well thought out intelligent answer
And thanks to you for answering no to my second question, illiterate
fluffer gimp
always the same , always the same , you're such a muslim
Tim
2014-11-24 20:20:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Tim
Post by %
Post by Tim
Post by %
do you ever talk about anything besides sexual incest deviances
Sure, whenever I talk about your sexual relations with your mom I'm
talking about bestiality, fluffer gimp. Do you ever make grammatical
sentences, fluffer gimp?
thank you for clearing that up for me ,
i knew i could count on you for ,
a reliable well thought out intelligent answer
And thanks to you for answering no to my second question, illiterate
fluffer gimp
always the same , always the same , you're such a muslim
No, the only thing the same here is the fact that you're an illiterate
fluffer gimp.
Don Martin
2014-11-24 16:01:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim
Post by Don Martin
<snip>
Post by Christopher A. Lee
AA is for atheists to discuss and we have the right to trash trolls like >>> you,
or harass you for your nonsense.
Mad Joe lies that reaping what he sows
I thought he lied about raping sows, but perhaps I misunderstood.
His mom consented, so technically it was incest, not rape. Only later did
it turn into necrophilia.
He claims she just got better and better at it.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
Dakota
2014-11-23 06:34:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dakota
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect
(England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this
already. From your link "That is why we are determined
to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
In any case, the malicious communication is from the trolls who crash
the group, not the regulars they attack.
True.
Joe Bruno
2014-11-23 08:17:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dakota
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect (England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this already. From your link "That is why we are determined to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
Why does that make any difference? The act describes the type of behavior that is made illegal by the law and proscribes the associated penalty.
h***@gmail.com
2014-11-24 06:05:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Dakota
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect (England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this already. From your link "That is why we are determined to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
I would be surprised to find the term 'troll' in the text of the Act.
Why does that make any difference? The act describes the type of behavior that is made illegal by the law and proscribes the associated penalty.
What about your illegality in being a fake Jew ?
Would UK take action against someone who purported to be a Judaist Jew while promoting Christianity?
Joe Bruno
2014-11-23 06:21:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect (England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this already. From your link "That is why we are determined to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
It's time for me to do research. I'll collect the abusive polls of Lee into a package I can send to the British authorities.I hope they have jurisdiction over him.
h***@gmail.com
2014-11-24 05:59:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Bruno
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by JTEM
It's true, the U.K. is looking to pass
legislation which criminalizes a.a
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/britain-mulls-2-year-prison-sentence-for-people-found-guilty-of-trolling/
"Britain mulls 2-year prison sentence for people
found guilty of 'trolling'"
Whoops! There's the end of a.a and the collective!
-- --
http://jtem.tumblr.com/
The Malicious Communications Act is already in effect (England and Wales, I believe), and covers some of this already. From your link "That is why we are determined to quadruple the current six-month sentence."
Current.
Marvin Sebourn
It's time for me to do research. I'll collect the abusive polls of Lee into a package I can send to the British authorities.I hope they have jurisdiction over him.
Ya, good idea.

Since we are sure UK authority will charge you, let's see you do as you suggested. I can only imagine that you are nothing but a coward.
Loading...