Discussion:
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
(too old to reply)
v***@gmail.com
2018-03-12 02:59:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
Yap Honghor
2018-03-12 08:02:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
The piece is a bloody opinion from some idiot, no fact!!!!!!!
Gospel TT
2018-03-12 17:33:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
My cousin new some one that said science disprove's God & he got hit
by a car.
j***@gmail.com
2018-03-14 19:53:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Gospel TT
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
My cousin new some one that said science disprove's God & he got hit
by a car.
There you go. This "accident" was no accident! It was the triumph of Truth over Evil.
Street
2018-03-14 20:32:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by j***@gmail.com
Post by Gospel TT
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
My cousin new some one that said science disprove's God & he got hit
by a car.
There you go. This "accident" was no accident! It was the triumph of Truth over Evil.
LOL.
Gospel TT
2018-03-14 22:57:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by j***@gmail.com
Post by Gospel TT
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
My cousin new some one that said science disprove's God & he got hit
by a car.
There you go. This "accident" was no accident! It was the triumph of Truth over Evil.
It taut him to not say that cause you don't want to make God mad
cause he's filled with love for you & will kill you if you make him
mad.
default
2018-03-12 17:48:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
He starts with a lie:
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God. We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.

Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.




Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel

How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to Avoid and Fight
an Audit

God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding Universe

Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market

The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution, and the
Search for Peking Man

Why Science Does Not Disprove God
aaa
2018-03-13 08:10:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God. We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why evolution
that pretends to answer the philosophical question of life shouldn't be
called science.
Post by default
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to Avoid and Fight
an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution, and the
Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-03-13 10:14:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why evolution
that pretends to answer the philosophical question of life shouldn't be
called science.
_______________

Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution is taught as a fact.

So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and many other benefits to the human race?

Hmmmmm.

I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged, never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots who claim not to believe in some of the most well researched science known to man.
aaa
2018-03-13 11:04:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of life
shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged, never
read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots who claim
not to believe in some of the most well researched science known to
man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-03-13 19:38:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of life
shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution
is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged, never
read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots who claim
not to believe in some of the most well-researched science known to
man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will ever change that.
aaa
2018-03-14 07:06:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage
and thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and
tested evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease
prevention and many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False. The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted. What
science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation. It's intelligent
design. The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by chance.
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of antibiotics.
It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an imminent danger.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-16 01:51:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why evolution
that pretends to answer the philosophical question of life shouldn't
be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution
is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
It's a point you have yet to make.
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged, never
read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots who claim
not to believe in some of the most well-researched science known to
man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a fact
that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will ever
change that.
False.
Blind denial.
Post by aaa
The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
What science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
It's intelligent design.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by chance.
Nobody claims it does, liar.
Post by aaa
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of antibiotics.
It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an imminent danger.
Bacteria have intelligence, because they pray......

Who or what designed your supposed intelligent designer?
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-16 10:20:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question
of life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical
mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
It's a point you have yet to make.
According to you, it will never be made since you always blindly deny
everything.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage
and thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and
tested evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease
prevention and many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other
idiots who claim not to believe in some of the most
well-researched science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is
a fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up
will ever change that.
False.
Blind denial.
Untrue. My rejection is based on solid scientific proof and
philosophical understanding. I have refuted evolution both
scientifically and philosophically.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
What science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
It's intelligent design.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by chance.
Nobody claims it does, liar.
Then it's obvious random mutation can't explain the non-random
antibiotic resistance.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of
antibiotics. It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an
imminent danger.
Bacteria have intelligence, because they pray......
Bacteria does demonstrate certain level of intelligence capable to
understand the antibiotic threat. Ordinary humans wouldn't have such
intelligence without professional training and education.
Post by Smiler
Who or what designed your supposed intelligent designer?
God is self-created eternal truth and existence.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-17 02:55:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution
is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
It's a point you have yet to make.
According to you, it will never be made since you always blindly deny
everything.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged, never
read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots who
claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched science
known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False.
Blind denial.
Untrue. My rejection is based on solid scientific proof and
philosophical understanding. I have refuted evolution both
scientifically and philosophically.
Bullshit, liar.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted.
So you say. Now prove it.
Brave Sir Nunian runs away.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
What science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation.
So you say. Now prove it.
Brave Sir Nunian runs away.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It's intelligent design.
So you say. Now prove it.
Brave Sir Nunian runs away.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by chance.
Nobody claims it does, liar.
Then it's obvious random mutation can't explain the non-random
antibiotic resistance.
Yes it can, liar.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of antibiotics.
It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an imminent danger.
Bacteria have intelligence, because they pray......
Bacteria does demonstrate certain level of intelligence capable to
understand the antibiotic threat. Ordinary humans wouldn't have such
intelligence without professional training and education.
Post by Smiler
Who or what designed your supposed intelligent designer?
God is self-created eternal truth and existence.
If so, why cannot the universe be self-created?
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-17 13:39:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution
is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
It's a point you have yet to make.
According to you, it will never be made since you always blindly deny
everything.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged, never
read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots who
claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched science
known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False.
Blind denial.
Untrue. My rejection is based on solid scientific proof and
philosophical understanding. I have refuted evolution both
scientifically and philosophically.
Bullshit, liar.
No bullshit. It's a fact. No lies.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted.
So you say. Now prove it.
Brave Sir Nunian runs away.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
What science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation.
So you say. Now prove it.
Brave Sir Nunian runs away.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It's intelligent design.
So you say. Now prove it.
Brave Sir Nunian runs away.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by chance.
Nobody claims it does, liar.
Then it's obvious random mutation can't explain the non-random
antibiotic resistance.
Yes it can, liar.
Then it has just defied logic. It has become illogical daydreaming.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of antibiotics.
It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an imminent danger.
Bacteria have intelligence, because they pray......
Bacteria does demonstrate certain level of intelligence capable to
understand the antibiotic threat. Ordinary humans wouldn't have such
intelligence without professional training and education.
Post by Smiler
Who or what designed your supposed intelligent designer?
God is self-created eternal truth and existence.
If so, why cannot the universe be self-created?
Because nothing in the universe can exist forever as its foundation for
the universe to create itself.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-19 02:20:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
It's a point you have yet to make.
According to you, it will never be made since you always blindly deny
everything.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False.
Blind denial.
Untrue. My rejection is based on solid scientific proof and
philosophical understanding. I have refuted evolution both
scientifically and philosophically.
Bullshit, liar.
No bullshit. It's a fact. No lies.
Evolution is a fact, liar.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted.
So you say. Now prove it.
Brave Sir Nunian runs away.
ONCE
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
What science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation.
So you say. Now prove it.
Brave Sir Nunian runs away.
TWICE
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It's intelligent design.
So you say. Now prove it.
Brave Sir Nunian runs away.
THREE TIMES A COWARD.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by chance.
Nobody claims it does, liar.
Then it's obvious random mutation can't explain the non-random
antibiotic resistance.
Yes it can, liar.
Then it has just defied logic. It has become illogical daydreaming.
You're the expert on illogical daydreaming.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of antibiotics.
It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an imminent danger.
Bacteria have intelligence, because they pray......
Bacteria does demonstrate certain level of intelligence capable to
understand the antibiotic threat. Ordinary humans wouldn't have such
intelligence without professional training and education.
Post by Smiler
Who or what designed your supposed intelligent designer?
God is self-created eternal truth and existence.
If so, why cannot the universe be self-created?
Because nothing in the universe can exist forever
So you say. Now prove it.
You won't. You will run away like the coward you are.
Post by aaa
as its foundation for the universe to create itself.
Was that supposed to make sense?
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-19 08:48:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a
simple fact that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that
evolution is a fact that has been tested and verified and
nothing you make up will ever change that.
False.
Blind denial.
Untrue. My rejection is based on solid scientific proof and
philosophical understanding. I have refuted evolution both
scientifically and philosophically.
Bullshit, liar.
No bullshit. It's a fact. No lies.
Evolution is a fact, liar.
Blind belief.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by
chance.
Nobody claims it does, liar.
Then it's obvious random mutation can't explain the non-random
antibiotic resistance.
Yes it can, liar.
Then it has just defied logic. It has become illogical
daydreaming.
You're the expert on illogical daydreaming.
I made my point.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of
antibiotics. It's not random. It's an intelligent response
to an imminent danger.
Bacteria have intelligence, because they pray......
Bacteria does demonstrate certain level of intelligence capable
to understand the antibiotic threat. Ordinary humans wouldn't
have such intelligence without professional training and
education.
Post by Smiler
Who or what designed your supposed intelligent designer?
God is self-created eternal truth and existence.
If so, why cannot the universe be self-created?
Because nothing in the universe can exist forever
So you say. Now prove it. You won't. You will run away like the
coward you are.
You can't prove otherwise.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
as its foundation for the universe to create itself.
Was that supposed to make sense?
Why not?
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-20 00:31:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is
a fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up
will ever change that.
False.
Blind denial.
Untrue. My rejection is based on solid scientific proof and
philosophical understanding. I have refuted evolution both
scientifically and philosophically.
Bullshit, liar.
No bullshit. It's a fact. No lies.
Evolution is a fact, liar.
Blind belief.
I have no beliefs, liar.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by chance.
Nobody claims it does, liar.
Then it's obvious random mutation can't explain the non-random
antibiotic resistance.
Yes it can, liar.
Then it has just defied logic. It has become illogical daydreaming.
You're the expert on illogical daydreaming.
I made my point.
The one atop your little pointy head.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of
antibiotics. It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an
imminent danger.
Bacteria have intelligence, because they pray......
Bacteria does demonstrate certain level of intelligence capable to
understand the antibiotic threat. Ordinary humans wouldn't have such
intelligence without professional training and education.
Post by Smiler
Who or what designed your supposed intelligent designer?
God is self-created eternal truth and existence.
If so, why cannot the universe be self-created?
Because nothing in the universe can exist forever
Then either your supposed god cannot exist forever or it's not in this
universe, so cannot act on anything in this universe.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
So you say. Now prove it. You won't. You will run away like the coward
you are.
You can't prove otherwise.
Your claim. You prove it.
Until you do, I won't believe you.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
as its foundation for the universe to create itself.
Was that supposed to make sense?
Why not?
Because it's nonsense, like all your posts.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-20 15:28:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a
simple fact that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that
evolution is a fact that has been tested and verified
and nothing you make up will ever change that.
False.
Blind denial.
Untrue. My rejection is based on solid scientific proof
and philosophical understanding. I have refuted evolution
both scientifically and philosophically.
Bullshit, liar.
No bullshit. It's a fact. No lies.
Evolution is a fact, liar.
Blind belief.
I have no beliefs, liar.
What you said is a belief since nothing in evolution can be proven as
fact. Random mutation is a false explanation based on partial
observation. Natural selection is just imaginary thinking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by
chance.
Nobody claims it does, liar.
Then it's obvious random mutation can't explain the
non-random antibiotic resistance.
Yes it can, liar.
Then it has just defied logic. It has become illogical
daydreaming.
You're the expert on illogical daydreaming.
I made my point.
The one atop your little pointy head.
Blind denial.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It happens every time whenever there is the presence
of antibiotics. It's not random. It's an intelligent
response to an imminent danger.
Bacteria have intelligence, because they pray......
Bacteria does demonstrate certain level of intelligence
capable to understand the antibiotic threat. Ordinary
humans wouldn't have such intelligence without professional
training and education.
Post by Smiler
Who or what designed your supposed intelligent designer?
God is self-created eternal truth and existence.
If so, why cannot the universe be self-created?
Because nothing in the universe can exist forever
Then either your supposed god cannot exist forever or it's not in
this universe, so cannot act on anything in this universe.
God's existence is the spiritual existence. The spiritual existence
dominates and determines everything in the physical existence.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
So you say. Now prove it. You won't. You will run away like the
coward you are.
You can't prove otherwise.
Your claim. You prove it. Until you do, I won't believe you.
What I said is just simple common understanding. It's proven by science.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
as its foundation for the universe to create itself.
Was that supposed to make sense?
Why not?
Because it's nonsense, like all your posts.
Blind denial.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-03-20 17:54:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
What you said is a belief since nothing in evolution can be proven as
fact.
Evolution observed, recorded and measured:


http://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/

http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/02/evolution-in-real-time/

http://discovermagazine.com/2015/march/19-life-in-the-fast-lane

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-42103058
Marvin Sebourn
2018-03-18 03:49:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage
and thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and
tested evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease
prevention and many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False. The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted. What
science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation. It's intelligent
design. The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by chance.
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of antibiotics.
It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an imminent danger.
To me it is amusing, no, on further thought disgusting, that aaa takes this approach to show the evidence for the existence of a creator, that this creator, in his or her benign design, deliberately makes bacteria to be more resistant to the efforts of humankind, efforts made to stop the bacteria from causing death or damage to the people of the world, particularly continuing the suffering and killing of the innocents. I see nothing Intelligent in your ravings, nothing that even a semi-rational believer would use to prove the existence of your god, who in this case deliberately causes the suffering and death of millions of innocent people.


Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
TT Liams
2018-03-18 07:53:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:49:38 -0700 (PDT), Marvin Sebourn
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical
mistake.
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage
and thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and
tested evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease
prevention and many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False. The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted. What
science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation. It's
intelligent
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
design. The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by
chance.=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
It happens every time whenever there is the presence of
antibiotics.
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an imminent
danger.
Post by Marvin Sebourn
To me it is amusing, no, on further thought disgusting, that aaa
takes this=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
approach to show the evidence for the existence of a creator, that
this cr=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
eator, in his or her benign design, deliberately makes bacteria to
be more =
Post by Marvin Sebourn
resistant to the efforts of humankind, efforts made to stop the
bacteria fr=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
om causing death or damage to the people of the world, particularly
continu=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
ing the suffering and killing of the innocents. I see nothing
Intelligent i=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
n your ravings, nothing that even a semi-rational believer would
use to pro=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
ve the existence of your god, who in this case deliberately causes
the suff=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
ering and death of millions of innocent people.
Marvin Sebourn
Well said, Marvin. Aaa is a blasphemer
Cloud Hobbit
2018-03-18 08:40:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
To me it is amusing, no, on further thought disgusting, that aaa takes this approach to show the evidence for the existence of a creator, that this creator, in his or her benign design, deliberately makes bacteria to be more resistant to the efforts of humankind, efforts made to stop the bacteria from causing death or damage to the people of the world, particularly continuing the suffering and killing of the innocents. I see nothing Intelligent in your ravings, nothing that even a semi-rational believer would use to prove the existence of your god, who in this case deliberately causes the suffering and death of millions of innocent people.
________________

Apparently, all something he says has to do is not make sense.
He just brushes off any contradictions by saying it must be our spiritual blindness.

He also encourages people to disagree with him.

I think he's a great pretender.
TT Liams
2018-03-18 15:36:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:40:06 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by Marvin Sebourn
To me it is amusing, no, on further thought disgusting, that aaa
takes this=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
approach to show the evidence for the existence of a creator, that
this cr=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
eator, in his or her benign design, deliberately makes bacteria to
be more =
Post by Marvin Sebourn
resistant to the efforts of humankind, efforts made to stop the
bacteria fr=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
om causing death or damage to the people of the world, particularly
continu=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
ing the suffering and killing of the innocents. I see nothing
Intelligent i=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
n your ravings, nothing that even a semi-rational believer would
use to pro=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
ve the existence of your god, who in this case deliberately causes
the suff=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
ering and death of millions of innocent people.
________________
Apparently, all something he says has to do is not make sense.
He just brushes off any contradictions by saying it must be our
spiritual b=
Post by Marvin Sebourn
lindness.
He also encourages people to disagree with him.
I think he's a great pretender.
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
Kevrob
2018-03-18 16:16:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
He may be pretending to be a survivor of an awful brain injury
that made him a rumdum. If so, he still could be a rumdum, naturally.

You don't have to be too clever to be a troll, when you rely
on the same canned responses.

Kevin R
TT Liams
2018-03-18 16:32:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
He may be pretending to be a survivor of an awful brain injury
that made him a rumdum. If so, he still could be a rumdum,
naturally.
Post by Kevrob
You don't have to be too clever to be a troll, when you rely
on the same canned responses.
Kevin R
He is very repetitious, I'll say that. (But then, pot/kettle too.) I
wonder what his motive would be. Attention? If so, he's certainly
getting a lot of it here.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-03-19 02:32:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
__________________

I believe so.

He showed up this time by posting some of his typical antievolution bullshit and when he was ignored posted something accusing us of being afraid or something like that.

He just denies every known fact in the universe and then claims he proved something.

His second law nonsense is straight out of creationist nonsense that has been debunked countless times over decades.

I think he has picked a persona not all that different from Bob.

Of course that could be my spiritual myopia.😀
Gospel TT
2018-03-19 17:53:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
__________________
I believe so.
He showed up this time by posting some of his typical antievolution
bullshi=
Post by TT Liams
t and when he was ignored posted something accusing us of being
afraid or s=
Post by TT Liams
omething like that.
He just denies every known fact in the universe and then claims he
proved s=
Post by TT Liams
omething.
His second law nonsense is straight out of creationist nonsense
that has be=
Post by TT Liams
en debunked countless times over decades.
I think he has picked a persona not all that different from Bob.
Of course that could be my spiritual myopia.
Thx Cloud I hope he's fake cause that would be more better then if he
was real.
Peter Pan
2018-03-19 22:27:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Gospel TT
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
__________________
I believe so.
He showed up this time by posting some of his typical antievolution
bullshi=
Post by TT Liams
t and when he was ignored posted something accusing us of being
afraid or s=
Post by TT Liams
omething like that.
He just denies every known fact in the universe and then claims he
proved s=
Post by TT Liams
omething.
His second law nonsense is straight out of creationist nonsense
that has be=
Post by TT Liams
en debunked countless times over decades.
I think he has picked a persona not all that different from Bob.
Of course that could be my spiritual myopia.
Thx Cloud I hope he's fake cause that would be more better then if he
was real.
I suppose you're right, and he probably is fake, but it
would be cool if there really were spiritual dragons.

But praying bacteria, not so much.
Gospel TT
2018-03-20 19:26:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Peter Pan
Post by Gospel TT
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
__________________
I believe so.
He showed up this time by posting some of his typical
antievolution
Post by Peter Pan
Post by Gospel TT
bullshi=
Post by TT Liams
t and when he was ignored posted something accusing us of being
afraid or s=
Post by TT Liams
omething like that.
He just denies every known fact in the universe and then claims he
proved s=
Post by TT Liams
omething.
His second law nonsense is straight out of creationist nonsense
that has be=
Post by TT Liams
en debunked countless times over decades.
I think he has picked a persona not all that different from Bob.
Of course that could be my spiritual myopia.
Thx Cloud I hope he's fake cause that would be more better then if he
was real.
I suppose you're right, and he probably is fake, but it
would be cool if there really were spiritual dragons.
But praying bacteria, not so much.
I don't care if they pray, as long as they never get their wish.
Peter Pan
2018-03-20 21:30:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Peter Pan
Post by Gospel TT
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
__________________
I believe so.
He showed up this time by posting some of his typical
antievolution
Post by Peter Pan
Post by Gospel TT
bullshi=
Post by TT Liams
t and when he was ignored posted something accusing us of being
afraid or s=
Post by TT Liams
omething like that.
He just denies every known fact in the universe and then claims
he
Post by Peter Pan
Post by Gospel TT
proved s=
Post by TT Liams
omething.
His second law nonsense is straight out of creationist nonsense
that has be=
Post by TT Liams
en debunked countless times over decades.
I think he has picked a persona not all that different from Bob.
Of course that could be my spiritual myopia.
Thx Cloud I hope he's fake cause that would be more better then
if he
Post by Peter Pan
Post by Gospel TT
was real.
I suppose you're right, and he probably is fake, but it
would be cool if there really were spiritual dragons.
But praying bacteria, not so much.
I don't care if they pray, as long as they never get their wish.
Yeah, it's like when you and the enemy both pray before
the big battle. You never know whose side Jovie is on
that day.
Smiler
2018-03-20 00:24:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Gospel TT
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
__________________
I believe so.
He showed up this time by posting some of his typical antievolution
bullshit and when he was ignored posted something accusing us of
being afraid or something like that.
He just denies every known fact in the universe and then claims he proved something.
His second law nonsense is straight out of creationist nonsense
that has been debunked countless times over decades.
I think he has picked a persona not all that different from Bob.
Of course that could be my spiritual myopia.
Thx Cloud I hope he's fake cause that would be more better then if he
was real.
If he's faking insanity it begs the question:- Why would anyone sane do that?
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Gospel TT
2018-03-20 20:35:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by Gospel TT
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
__________________
I believe so.
He showed up this time by posting some of his typical
antievolution
Post by Smiler
Post by Gospel TT
Post by TT Liams
bullshit and when he was ignored posted something accusing us of
being afraid or something like that.
He just denies every known fact in the universe and then claims he
proved something.
His second law nonsense is straight out of creationist nonsense
that has been debunked countless times over decades.
I think he has picked a persona not all that different from Bob.
Of course that could be my spiritual myopia.
Thx Cloud I hope he's fake cause that would be more better then if he
was real.
If he's faking insanity it begs the question:- Why would anyone sane do that?
That's true I can't see a motive.
Peter Pan
2018-03-20 21:38:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Smiler
Post by Gospel TT
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
__________________
I believe so.
He showed up this time by posting some of his typical
antievolution
Post by Smiler
Post by Gospel TT
Post by TT Liams
bullshit and when he was ignored posted something accusing us of
being afraid or something like that.
He just denies every known fact in the universe and then claims
he
Post by Smiler
Post by Gospel TT
Post by TT Liams
proved something.
His second law nonsense is straight out of creationist nonsense
that has been debunked countless times over decades.
I think he has picked a persona not all that different from Bob.
Of course that could be my spiritual myopia.
Thx Cloud I hope he's fake cause that would be more better then
if he
Post by Smiler
Post by Gospel TT
was real.
If he's faking insanity it begs the question:- Why would anyone
sane do that?
That's true I can't see a motive.
Being an attention whore.
%
2018-03-20 21:49:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Gospel TT
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:32:30 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by TT Liams
Is he just pretending he's a rumdum???????
__________________
Post by Cloud Hobbit
I believe so.
He showed up this time by posting some of his typical
antievolution
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Gospel TT
Post by TT Liams
bullshit and when he was ignored posted something accusing us of >>
being afraid or something like that.
Post by Gospel TT
Post by TT Liams
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
He just denies every known fact in the universe and then claims
he
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Gospel TT
Post by TT Liams
proved something.
His second law nonsense is straight out of creationist nonsense
that has been debunked countless times over decades.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
I think he has picked a persona not all that different from Bob.
Of course that could be my spiritual myopia.
Thx Cloud I hope he's fake cause that would be more better then
if he
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Gospel TT
was real.
If he's faking insanity it begs the question:- Why would anyone
sane do that?
That's true I can't see a motive.
it makes money

aaa
2018-03-18 09:23:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question
of life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical
mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain
damage and thinks cells can pray or science that has
researched and tested evolution and brought new medicine,
crops, disease prevention and many other benefits to the
human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other
idiots who claim not to believe in some of the most
well-researched science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is
a fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up
will ever change that.
False. The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted. What
science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation. It's
intelligent design. The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't
happen by chance. It happens every time whenever there is the
presence of antibiotics. It's not random. It's an intelligent
response to an imminent danger.
To me it is amusing, no, on further thought disgusting, that aaa
takes this approach to show the evidence for the existence of a
creator, that this creator, in his or her benign design, deliberately
makes bacteria to be more resistant to the efforts of humankind,
efforts made to stop the bacteria from causing death or damage to the
people of the world, particularly continuing the suffering and
killing of the innocents. I see nothing Intelligent in your ravings,
nothing that even a semi-rational believer would use to prove the
existence of your god, who in this case deliberately causes the
suffering and death of millions of innocent people.
That would be your intentional misinterpretation of what I said. Instead
of talking about bacteria from the view of science or philosophy, you
have made it a political issue about killing people. That doesn't prove
me wrong. It only shows that you have run out of argument.
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness,
intelligence, happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom,
and life itself.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-19 02:27:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution
is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False. The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted. What
science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation. It's intelligent
design. The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by
chance. It happens every time whenever there is the presence of
antibiotics. It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an
imminent danger.
To me it is amusing, no, on further thought disgusting, that aaa takes
this approach to show the evidence for the existence of a creator, that
this creator, in his or her benign design, deliberately makes bacteria
to be more resistant to the efforts of humankind, efforts made to stop
the bacteria from causing death or damage to the people of the world,
particularly continuing the suffering and killing of the innocents. I
see nothing Intelligent in your ravings, nothing that even a
semi-rational believer would use to prove the existence of your god,
who in this case deliberately causes the suffering and death of
millions of innocent people.
That would be your intentional misinterpretation of what I said. Instead
of talking about bacteria from the view of science or philosophy, you
have made it a political issue about killing people. That doesn't prove
me wrong. It only shows that you have run out of argument.
Thanks for admitting that you worship an evil god.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-19 08:49:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution
is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False. The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted. What
science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation. It's intelligent
design. The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by
chance. It happens every time whenever there is the presence of
antibiotics. It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an
imminent danger.
To me it is amusing, no, on further thought disgusting, that aaa takes
this approach to show the evidence for the existence of a creator, that
this creator, in his or her benign design, deliberately makes bacteria
to be more resistant to the efforts of humankind, efforts made to stop
the bacteria from causing death or damage to the people of the world,
particularly continuing the suffering and killing of the innocents. I
see nothing Intelligent in your ravings, nothing that even a
semi-rational believer would use to prove the existence of your god,
who in this case deliberately causes the suffering and death of
millions of innocent people.
That would be your intentional misinterpretation of what I said. Instead
of talking about bacteria from the view of science or philosophy, you
have made it a political issue about killing people. That doesn't prove
me wrong. It only shows that you have run out of argument.
Thanks for admitting that you worship an evil god.
Pure projection.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-20 00:25:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False. The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted. What
science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation. It's intelligent
design. The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by
chance. It happens every time whenever there is the presence of
antibiotics. It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an
imminent danger.
To me it is amusing, no, on further thought disgusting, that aaa
takes this approach to show the evidence for the existence of a
creator, that this creator, in his or her benign design, deliberately
makes bacteria to be more resistant to the efforts of humankind,
efforts made to stop the bacteria from causing death or damage to the
people of the world, particularly continuing the suffering and
killing of the innocents. I see nothing Intelligent in your ravings,
nothing that even a semi-rational believer would use to prove the
existence of your god, who in this case deliberately causes the
suffering and death of millions of innocent people.
That would be your intentional misinterpretation of what I said.
Instead of talking about bacteria from the view of science or
philosophy, you have made it a political issue about killing people.
That doesn't prove me wrong. It only shows that you have run out of
argument.
Thanks for admitting that you worship an evil god.
Pure projection.
Pure blind denial.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-20 15:30:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Marvin Sebourn
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
The moron speaks the same bullshit as before.
It's a simple point you can't argue against.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well-researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
The simple fact that needs to be recognized is that evolution is a
fact that has been tested and verified and nothing you make up will
ever change that.
False. The scientific evidence has been falsely interpreted. What
science has discovered in bacteria isn't mutation. It's intelligent
design. The antibiotic resistance in bacteria doesn't happen by
chance. It happens every time whenever there is the presence of
antibiotics. It's not random. It's an intelligent response to an
imminent danger.
To me it is amusing, no, on further thought disgusting, that aaa
takes this approach to show the evidence for the existence of a
creator, that this creator, in his or her benign design, deliberately
makes bacteria to be more resistant to the efforts of humankind,
efforts made to stop the bacteria from causing death or damage to the
people of the world, particularly continuing the suffering and
killing of the innocents. I see nothing Intelligent in your ravings,
nothing that even a semi-rational believer would use to prove the
existence of your god, who in this case deliberately causes the
suffering and death of millions of innocent people.
That would be your intentional misinterpretation of what I said.
Instead of talking about bacteria from the view of science or
philosophy, you have made it a political issue about killing people.
That doesn't prove me wrong. It only shows that you have run out of
argument.
Thanks for admitting that you worship an evil god.
Pure projection.
Pure blind denial.
I do know the God I worship. It can't be blind denial.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
default
2018-03-14 14:34:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of life
shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
LOL, philosophy is basically an opinion, there is no such thing as a
philosophical mistake, there are just different opinions.

All this talk about philosophy and you don't even know what it is...
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged, never
read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots who claim
not to believe in some of the most well researched science known to
man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
That is hypocritical. You have done nothing but project, expound,
express, etc., your beliefs.
aaa
2018-03-14 23:44:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
LOL, philosophy is basically an opinion, there is no such thing as a
philosophical mistake, there are just different opinions.
Are you sure? I didn't know that philosophy has been corrupted to such
sorry state.
Post by default
All this talk about philosophy and you don't even know what it is...
I may not know the current condition of philosophy, but I do know what
philosophy is supposed to be.
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage
and thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and
tested evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease
prevention and many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
That is hypocritical. You have done nothing but project, expound,
express, etc., your beliefs.
Not true. My simple point is quite logical and reasonable. It's actually
based on your own understanding about philosophy. Sorry you don't even
realize that.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
default
2018-03-15 02:39:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
LOL, philosophy is basically an opinion, there is no such thing as a
philosophical mistake, there are just different opinions.
Are you sure? I didn't know that philosophy has been corrupted to such
sorry state.
It has never been anything but. It hasn't been corrupted it has
always embraced a wide range of ideas, and some pretty outlandish
ones.
Post by aaa
Post by default
All this talk about philosophy and you don't even know what it is...
I may not know the current condition of philosophy, but I do know what
philosophy is supposed to be.
In your mind it is some kind of justification of religion or belief in
gods.
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage
and thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and
tested evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease
prevention and many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
That is hypocritical. You have done nothing but project, expound,
express, etc., your beliefs.
Not true. My simple point is quite logical and reasonable. It's actually
based on your own understanding about philosophy. Sorry you don't even
realize that.
Did you wander into alt.ATHIEST and think that we'd allow ourselves to
be led to religion? or belief in gods if you don't like the word
religion.
aaa
2018-03-15 09:44:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
LOL, philosophy is basically an opinion, there is no such thing as a
philosophical mistake, there are just different opinions.
Are you sure? I didn't know that philosophy has been corrupted to such
sorry state.
It has never been anything but. It hasn't been corrupted it has
always embraced a wide range of ideas, and some pretty outlandish
ones.
Just as I said before, modern philosophy is dead. It's total chaos.
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
All this talk about philosophy and you don't even know what it is...
I may not know the current condition of philosophy, but I do know what
philosophy is supposed to be.
In your mind it is some kind of justification of religion or belief in
gods.
No. God is both religious and secular. God's secular teaching is shown
in Buddhism and Taoism.
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage
and thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and
tested evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease
prevention and many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
That is hypocritical. You have done nothing but project, expound,
express, etc., your beliefs.
Not true. My simple point is quite logical and reasonable. It's actually
based on your own understanding about philosophy. Sorry you don't even
realize that.
Did you wander into alt.ATHIEST and think that we'd allow ourselves to
be led to religion? or belief in gods if you don't like the word
religion.
My talk of philosophy isn't religious. It's all about God's truth and
reality which is the focus of philosophical study. Religious worship is
not required in philosophical study, but God's dominate position in
philosophy must be acknowledged in order to have any meaningful
philosophical accomplishment. The real philosophical understanding can
only be acquired from God directly.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-16 01:55:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution
is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
LOL, philosophy is basically an opinion, there is no such thing as a
philosophical mistake, there are just different opinions.
Are you sure? I didn't know that philosophy has been corrupted to such
sorry state.
It has never been anything but. It hasn't been corrupted it has always
embraced a wide range of ideas, and some pretty outlandish ones.
Just as I said before, modern philosophy is dead. It's total chaos.
But more meaningful than your supposed philosophy.
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by default
All this talk about philosophy and you don't even know what it is...
I may not know the current condition of philosophy, but I do know what
philosophy is supposed to be.
In your mind it is some kind of justification of religion or belief in
gods.
No. God is both religious and secular. God's secular teaching is shown
in Buddhism and Taoism.
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged, never
read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots who
claim not to believe in some of the most well researched science
known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
That is hypocritical. You have done nothing but project, expound,
express, etc., your beliefs.
Not true. My simple point is quite logical and reasonable. It's
actually based on your own understanding about philosophy. Sorry you
don't even realize that.
Did you wander into alt.ATHIEST and think that we'd allow ourselves to
be led to religion? or belief in gods if you don't like the word
religion.
My talk of philosophy isn't religious. It's all about God's truth and
reality which is the focus of philosophical study.
Contradiction, much.

<snip insane bullshit>
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-16 10:26:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's
why evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical
question of life shouldn't be called science.
_______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical
mistake.
LOL, philosophy is basically an opinion, there is no such
thing as a philosophical mistake, there are just different
opinions.
Are you sure? I didn't know that philosophy has been corrupted
to such sorry state.
It has never been anything but. It hasn't been corrupted it has
always embraced a wide range of ideas, and some pretty outlandish
ones.
Just as I said before, modern philosophy is dead. It's total
chaos.
But more meaningful than your supposed philosophy.
I disagree. My philosophy does expose the obvious philosophical mistake
made by evolution. Modern philosophy should have taken care of evolution
a long time ago without me worrying about. It didn't. It proves that
modern philosophy is just useless junk that nobody needs to understand.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
All this talk about philosophy and you don't even know what it is...
I may not know the current condition of philosophy, but I do
know what philosophy is supposed to be.
In your mind it is some kind of justification of religion or
belief in gods.
No. God is both religious and secular. God's secular teaching is
shown in Buddhism and Taoism.
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain
damage and thinks cells can pray or science that has
researched and tested evolution and brought new medicine,
crops, disease prevention and many other benefits to the
human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain
damaged, never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to
the other idiots who claim not to believe in some of the
most well researched science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple
fact that people need to realize.
That is hypocritical. You have done nothing but project,
expound, express, etc., your beliefs.
Not true. My simple point is quite logical and reasonable.
It's actually based on your own understanding about philosophy.
Sorry you don't even realize that.
Did you wander into alt.ATHIEST and think that we'd allow
ourselves to be led to religion? or belief in gods if you don't
like the word religion.
My talk of philosophy isn't religious. It's all about God's truth
and reality which is the focus of philosophical study.
Contradiction, much.
There is no contradiction. I did explain myself in the later part of my
post which you have conveniently deleted.
Post by Smiler
<snip insane bullshit>
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-17 02:51:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
LOL, philosophy is basically an opinion, there is no such thing as
a philosophical mistake, there are just different opinions.
Are you sure? I didn't know that philosophy has been corrupted to
such sorry state.
It has never been anything but. It hasn't been corrupted it has
always embraced a wide range of ideas, and some pretty outlandish
ones.
Just as I said before, modern philosophy is dead. It's total chaos.
But more meaningful than your supposed philosophy.
I disagree. My philosophy does expose the obvious philosophical mistake
made by evolution.
Evolution is NOT philosophy, liar.
Post by aaa
Modern philosophy should have taken care of evolution
a long time ago without me worrying about. It didn't. It proves that
modern philosophy is just useless junk that nobody needs to understand.
It proves that you are insane.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
All this talk about philosophy and you don't even know what it is...
I may not know the current condition of philosophy, but I do know
what philosophy is supposed to be.
In your mind it is some kind of justification of religion or belief
in gods.
No. God is both religious and secular. God's secular teaching is shown
in Buddhism and Taoism.
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine,
crops, disease prevention and many other benefits to the human
race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots
who claim not to believe in some of the most well researched
science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
That is hypocritical. You have done nothing but project, expound,
express, etc., your beliefs.
Not true. My simple point is quite logical and reasonable. It's
actually based on your own understanding about philosophy.
Sorry you don't even realize that.
Did you wander into alt.ATHIEST and think that we'd allow ourselves
to be led to religion? or belief in gods if you don't like the word
religion.
My talk of philosophy isn't religious. It's all about God's truth and
reality which is the focus of philosophical study.
Contradiction, much.
There is no contradiction.
Yes there is, liar.
Post by aaa
I did explain myself in the later part of my
post which you have conveniently deleted.
No you didn't, liar.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
<snip insane bullshit>
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-17 13:55:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:04:49 +0800, aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions.
That's why evolution that pretends to answer the
philosophical question of life shouldn't be called
science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science
disciplines evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible
philosophical mistake.
LOL, philosophy is basically an opinion, there is no such
thing as a philosophical mistake, there are just
different opinions.
Are you sure? I didn't know that philosophy has been
corrupted to such sorry state.
It has never been anything but. It hasn't been corrupted it
has always embraced a wide range of ideas, and some pretty
outlandish ones.
Just as I said before, modern philosophy is dead. It's total chaos.
But more meaningful than your supposed philosophy.
I disagree. My philosophy does expose the obvious philosophical
mistake made by evolution.
Evolution is NOT philosophy, liar.
Evolution is an explanation of life. Life is a philosophical subject
that can only be explained by philosophy. By trying to explain the
philosophical subject of life, evolution has made itself a de facto
philosophical theory. This is why the theory of evolution is entirely
abstract with no real scientific substance. It's nothing like Newton's
law or Einstein's equation. It's just imaginary thinking by the name of
random mutation and natural selection.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Modern philosophy should have taken care of evolution a long time
ago without me worrying about. It didn't. It proves that modern
philosophy is just useless junk that nobody needs to understand.
It proves that you are insane.
My argument is based on evidence and logic. There is nothing insane
about that.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
All this talk about philosophy and you don't even know
what it is...
I may not know the current condition of philosophy, but I
do know what philosophy is supposed to be.
In your mind it is some kind of justification of religion or
belief in gods.
No. God is both religious and secular. God's secular teaching
is shown in Buddhism and Taoism.
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has
brain damage and thinks cells can pray or science
that has researched and tested evolution and brought
new medicine, crops, disease prevention and many
other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain
damaged, never read the bible or a book on
philosophy, to the other idiots who claim not to
believe in some of the most well researched science
known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a
simple fact that people need to realize.
That is hypocritical. You have done nothing but project,
expound, express, etc., your beliefs.
Not true. My simple point is quite logical and reasonable.
It's actually based on your own understanding about
philosophy. Sorry you don't even realize that.
Did you wander into alt.ATHIEST and think that we'd allow
ourselves to be led to religion? or belief in gods if you
don't like the word religion.
My talk of philosophy isn't religious. It's all about God's
truth and reality which is the focus of philosophical study.
Contradiction, much.
There is no contradiction.
Yes there is, liar.
No, you deleted my explanation to make it appear that way.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
I did explain myself in the later part of my post which you have
conveniently deleted.
No you didn't, liar.
Blind denial.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
<snip insane bullshit>
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-19 02:12:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines
evolution is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
LOL, philosophy is basically an opinion, there is no such thing
as a philosophical mistake, there are just different opinions.
Are you sure? I didn't know that philosophy has been corrupted to
such sorry state.
It has never been anything but. It hasn't been corrupted it has
always embraced a wide range of ideas, and some pretty outlandish
ones.
Just as I said before, modern philosophy is dead. It's total chaos.
But more meaningful than your supposed philosophy.
I disagree. My philosophy does expose the obvious philosophical
mistake made by evolution.
Evolution is NOT philosophy, liar.
Evolution is an explanation of life.
It's an explanation of *how life changes over time*
Post by aaa
Life is a philosophical subject that can only be explained by philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.

<snip insane and unevidenced bullshit>
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Modern philosophy should have taken care of evolution a long time ago
without me worrying about. It didn't. It proves that modern philosophy
is just useless junk that nobody needs to understand.
It proves that you are insane.
My argument is based on evidence and logic.
There is no evidence nor logic in any of your posts, liar.
Post by aaa
There is nothing insane about that.
More evidence for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
All this talk about philosophy and you don't even know what it is...
I may not know the current condition of philosophy, but I do know
what philosophy is supposed to be.
In your mind it is some kind of justification of religion or belief
in gods.
No. God is both religious and secular. God's secular teaching is
shown in Buddhism and Taoism.
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage
and thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and
tested evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease
prevention and many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged,
never read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other
idiots who claim not to believe in some of the most well
researched science known to man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact
that people need to realize.
That is hypocritical. You have done nothing but project,
expound, express, etc., your beliefs.
Not true. My simple point is quite logical and reasonable.
It's actually based on your own understanding about philosophy.
Sorry you don't even realize that.
Did you wander into alt.ATHIEST and think that we'd allow ourselves
to be led to religion? or belief in gods if you don't like the
word religion.
My talk of philosophy isn't religious. It's all about God's truth
and reality which is the focus of philosophical study.
Contradiction, much.
There is no contradiction.
Yes there is, liar.
No, you deleted my explanation to make it appear that way.
Your insane bullshit didn't amount to an explanation.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
I did explain myself in the later part of my post which you have
conveniently deleted.
No you didn't, liar.
Blind denial.
That's all you have.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
<snip insane bullshit>
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-19 08:44:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
I disagree. My philosophy does expose the obvious
philosophical mistake made by evolution.
Evolution is NOT philosophy, liar.
Evolution is an explanation of life.
It's an explanation of *how life changes over time*
Same difference. It's still a philosophical subject.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Life is a philosophical subject that can only be explained by
philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
Life is the study of philosophy. It's entirely an abstract concept
incapable to be studied by science. Science can only observe the living
tissues. It can't observe life itself.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
<snip insane bullshit>
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-20 00:20:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
I disagree. My philosophy does expose the obvious philosophical
mistake made by evolution.
Evolution is NOT philosophy, liar.
Evolution is an explanation of life.
It's an explanation of *how life changes over time*
Same difference. It's still a philosophical subject.
Nope, liar. It's a wholly scientific subject.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Life is a philosophical subject that can only be explained by philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
Life is the study of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
It's entirely an abstract concept incapable to be studied by science.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
Science can only observe the living tissues. It can't observe life itself.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
<snip insane bullshit>
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-20 14:34:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
I disagree. My philosophy does expose the obvious
philosophical mistake made by evolution.
Evolution is NOT philosophy, liar.
Evolution is an explanation of life.
It's an explanation of *how life changes over time*
Same difference. It's still a philosophical subject.
Nope, liar. It's a wholly scientific subject.
Science doesn't explain life. It only explains the lifeless. It's
written in its definition.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Life is a philosophical subject that can only be explained by philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
Life is the study of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. Life is a philosophical subject studied and
explained only by philosophy. Nothing else in this world explains life.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
It's entirely an abstract concept incapable to be studied by
science.
So you say. Now prove it.
Nothing about life is physical. Its desire, emotion, knowledge,
understanding, consciousness, intelligence are all nonphysical.
Therefore, life has nothing for science to study.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Science can only observe the living tissues. It can't observe life itself.
So you say. Now prove it.
That's just a simple fact for you to realize.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
<snip insane bullshit>
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-03-14 16:40:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
_______________

If it were a "simple fact" then it could be demonstrated and proven.

There wouldn't be overwhelming support for evolution.

Next up aaa pulls new nonsense out of his ass and insists his shit don't stink and it's a fact we must realize.
aaa
2018-03-14 23:48:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
_______________
If it were a "simple fact" then it could be demonstrated and proven.
I have done that. There is nothing difficult to understand about my
simple point.
Post by aaa
There wouldn't be overwhelming support for evolution.
People who don't really understand philosophy are easily fooled by
evolution. That is expected.
Post by aaa
Next up aaa pulls new nonsense out of his ass and insists his shit
don't stink and it's a fact we must realize.
I have made my point. It's clear for everyone to see. I don't have to do
anything else.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-03-15 08:27:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
Post by aaa
people need to realize.
_______________
If it were a "simple fact" then it could be demonstrated and proven.
I have done that. There is nothing difficult to understand about my
simple point.
Post by aaa
There wouldn't be overwhelming support for evolution.
People who don't really understand philosophy are easily fooled by
evolution. That is expected.
________________

People who don't understand what evolution actually is start lying in order to try and discredit it.
Like you do.
You take an old idea, claim it's yours and then go off claiming you proved something.
Post by aaa
Next up aaa pulls new nonsense out of his ass and insists his shit
don't stink and it's a fact we must realize.
I have made my point. It's clear for everyone to see. I don't have to do
anything else.
- show quoted text -

You have made the point that you wish to be seen as a moron.
It's clear for everyone to see, you're a Fucking loon.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-03-19 18:49:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
have made my point. It's clear for everyone to see. I don't have to do
anything else.
- show quoted text -

You made your point and now everyone knows you're full of shit.
aaa
2018-03-20 15:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
have made my point. It's clear for everyone to see. I don't have to do
anything else.
- show quoted text -
You made your point and now everyone knows you're full of shit.
That's only your empty claim.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-15 08:37:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of life
shouldn't be called science. _______________
Yet in every university and among all science disciplines evolution
is taught as a fact.
That's why scientists have made a terrible philosophical mistake.
Science work on facts and formulas, does not generally deal with philosophy.
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
So whom to believe, a guy who claims that he has brain damage and
thinks cells can pray or science that has researched and tested
evolution and brought new medicine, crops, disease prevention and
many other benefits to the human race?
Hmmmmm.
I think I will go with science and ignore the brain damaged, never
read the bible or a book on philosophy, to the other idiots who claim
not to believe in some of the most well researched science known to
man.
This has nothing to do with belief. This is just a simple fact that
people need to realize.
This has every thing to do with belief....the more you are uneducated, the more you are religious and stupid.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-15 08:34:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God. We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why evolution
that pretends to answer the philosophical question of life shouldn't be
called science.
There are science in philosophy too.
But, one can also have science not touching philosophical questions.

Science can answer the reason for your head injury as well, but still have no cure for you yet. That is the reason you are still loony.
Post by aaa
Post by default
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to Avoid and Fight
an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution, and the
Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
Science can disprove any pixie any time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
aaa
2018-03-15 09:46:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
He starts with a lie: A number of recent books and articles would
have you believe that—somehow—science has now disproved the
existence of God. We know so much about how the universe works,
their authors claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can
explain all the workings of the universe without the need for a
Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
There are science in philosophy too.
Bullshit.
Post by Yap Honghor
But, one can also have science not touching philosophical questions.
Science can answer the reason for your head injury as well, but still
have no cure for you yet. That is the reason you are still loony.
Post by aaa
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to Avoid and
Fight an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution, and
the Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
Science can disprove any pixie any time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bullshit.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-16 07:20:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
He starts with a lie: A number of recent books and articles would
have you believe that—somehow—science has now disproved the
existence of God. We know so much about how the universe works,
their authors claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can
explain all the workings of the universe without the need for a
Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
There are science in philosophy too.
Bullshit.
That is not bullshit....science can be used to explain many of the philosophy matters as well! You also can use logic, or common sense to explain too.
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
But, one can also have science not touching philosophical questions.
Science can answer the reason for your head injury as well, but still
have no cure for you yet. That is the reason you are still loony.
Post by aaa
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to Avoid and
Fight an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution, and
the Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
Science can disprove any pixie any time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bullshit.
I know you only are in possession of 1/8 of your brain.....
aaa
2018-03-16 10:36:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
He starts with a lie: A number of recent books and articles
would have you believe that—somehow—science has now disproved
the existence of God. We know so much about how the universe
we can explain all the workings of the universe without the
need for a Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question
of life shouldn't be called science.
There are science in philosophy too.
Bullshit.
That is not bullshit....science can be used to explain many of the
philosophy matters as well! You also can use logic, or common sense
to explain too.
That's not possible for the real science and real philosophy. It may
happen to junk science and junk philosophy, but that's obviously a
stupid mistake. Science and philosophy are entirely different study with
different method of approach. Science studies the physical objects.
Philosophy studies the spiritual subjects. Science studies what's within
the mind. Philosophy studies what's beyond the mind. They are entirely
separated by the mind with philosophy dominating over science because
the philosophical truth is what science is based on.
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
But, one can also have science not touching philosophical
questions.
Science can answer the reason for your head injury as well, but
still have no cure for you yet. That is the reason you are still
loony.
Post by aaa
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to Avoid
and Fight an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding
Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution,
and the Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
Science can disprove any pixie any time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bullshit.
I know you only are in possession of 1/8 of your brain.....
And it appears working better than yours.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-17 12:36:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
He starts with a lie: A number of recent books and articles
would have you believe that—somehow—science has now disproved
the existence of God. We know so much about how the universe
we can explain all the workings of the universe without the
need for a Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question
of life shouldn't be called science.
There are science in philosophy too.
Bullshit.
That is not bullshit....science can be used to explain many of the
philosophy matters as well! You also can use logic, or common sense
to explain too.
That's not possible for the real science and real philosophy. It may
happen to junk science and junk philosophy, but that's obviously a
stupid mistake. Science and philosophy are entirely different study with
different method of approach. Science studies the physical objects.
Philosophy studies the spiritual subjects. Science studies what's within
the mind. Philosophy studies what's beyond the mind. They are entirely
separated by the mind with philosophy dominating over science because
the philosophical truth is what science is based on.
Not true....I can use science to tell me about all philosophical questions.
It really depends on what angle you regard a certain subject or topic...although you can also rely upon common sense.
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
But, one can also have science not touching philosophical
questions.
Science can answer the reason for your head injury as well, but
still have no cure for you yet. That is the reason you are still
loony.
Post by aaa
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to Avoid
and Fight an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding
Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution,
and the Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
Science can disprove any pixie any time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bullshit.
I know you only are in possession of 1/8 of your brain.....
And it appears working better than yours.
That is your unprofessional opinion. Try asking a professional doctor...
aaa
2018-03-17 14:03:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
He starts with a lie: A number of recent books and articles
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
would have you believe that—somehow—science has now
disproved the existence of God. We know so much about how
the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of
the universe without the need for a Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional
ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's
why evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical
question of life shouldn't be called science.
There are science in philosophy too.
Bullshit.
That is not bullshit....science can be used to explain many of
the philosophy matters as well! You also can use logic, or common
sense to explain too.
That's not possible for the real science and real philosophy. It
may happen to junk science and junk philosophy, but that's
obviously a stupid mistake. Science and philosophy are entirely
different study with different method of approach. Science studies
the physical objects. Philosophy studies the spiritual subjects.
Science studies what's within the mind. Philosophy studies what's
beyond the mind. They are entirely separated by the mind with
philosophy dominating over science because the philosophical truth
is what science is based on.
Not true....I can use science to tell me about all philosophical
questions. It really depends on what angle you regard a certain
subject or topic...although you can also rely upon common sense.
Wonderful. I suppose you want to show me an example of that.
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
But, one can also have science not touching philosophical
questions.
Science can answer the reason for your head injury as well,
but still have no cure for you yet. That is the reason you
are still loony.
Post by aaa
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to
Avoid and Fight an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding
Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin,
Evolution, and the Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
Science can disprove any pixie any
time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bullshit.
I know you only are in possession of 1/8 of your brain.....
And it appears working better than yours.
That is your unprofessional opinion. Try asking a professional
doctor...
Why bother? I think our discussion in here has already proved it.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-18 02:18:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
He starts with a lie: A number of recent books and articles
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
would have you believe that—somehow—science has now
disproved the existence of God. We know so much about how
the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of
the universe without the need for a Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional
ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's
why evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical
question of life shouldn't be called science.
There are science in philosophy too.
Bullshit.
That is not bullshit....science can be used to explain many of
the philosophy matters as well! You also can use logic, or common
sense to explain too.
That's not possible for the real science and real philosophy. It
may happen to junk science and junk philosophy, but that's
obviously a stupid mistake. Science and philosophy are entirely
different study with different method of approach. Science studies
the physical objects. Philosophy studies the spiritual subjects.
Science studies what's within the mind. Philosophy studies what's
beyond the mind. They are entirely separated by the mind with
philosophy dominating over science because the philosophical truth
is what science is based on.
Not true....I can use science to tell me about all philosophical
questions. It really depends on what angle you regard a certain
subject or topic...although you can also rely upon common sense.
Wonderful. I suppose you want to show me an example of that.
Ah, there is nothing that can impress your damaged cells!!!
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
But, one can also have science not touching philosophical questions.
Science can answer the reason for your head injury as well,
but still have no cure for you yet. That is the reason you
are still loony.
Post by aaa
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to
Avoid and Fight an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin,
Evolution, and the Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
Science can disprove any pixie any
time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bullshit.
I know you only are in possession of 1/8 of your brain.....
And it appears working better than yours.
That is your unprofessional opinion. Try asking a professional doctor...
Why bother? I think our discussion in here has already proved it.
Indeed, all of us here are impressed with insanity!!!
aaa
2018-03-18 09:26:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
He starts with a lie: A number of recent books and articles
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
would have you believe that—somehow—science has now
disproved the existence of God. We know so much about how
the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of
the universe without the need for a Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional
ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's
why evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical
question of life shouldn't be called science.
There are science in philosophy too.
Bullshit.
That is not bullshit....science can be used to explain many of
the philosophy matters as well! You also can use logic, or common
sense to explain too.
That's not possible for the real science and real philosophy. It
may happen to junk science and junk philosophy, but that's
obviously a stupid mistake. Science and philosophy are entirely
different study with different method of approach. Science studies
the physical objects. Philosophy studies the spiritual subjects.
Science studies what's within the mind. Philosophy studies what's
beyond the mind. They are entirely separated by the mind with
philosophy dominating over science because the philosophical truth
is what science is based on.
Not true....I can use science to tell me about all philosophical
questions. It really depends on what angle you regard a certain
subject or topic...although you can also rely upon common sense.
Wonderful. I suppose you want to show me an example of that.
Ah, there is nothing that can impress your damaged cells!!!
Avoidance noted.
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
But, one can also have science not touching philosophical questions.
Science can answer the reason for your head injury as well,
but still have no cure for you yet. That is the reason you
are still loony.
Post by aaa
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to
Avoid and Fight an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin,
Evolution, and the Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
Science can disprove any pixie any
time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bullshit.
I know you only are in possession of 1/8 of your brain.....
And it appears working better than yours.
That is your unprofessional opinion. Try asking a professional doctor...
Why bother? I think our discussion in here has already proved it.
Indeed, all of us here are impressed with insanity!!!
Really? That must be some kind of inconvenient truth to you.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-19 02:33:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
He starts with a lie: A number of recent books and articles
would have you believe that—somehow—science has now disproved
the existence of God. We know so much about how the universe
works, their authors claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we
can explain all the workings of the universe without the need
for a Creator.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
Science does not answer philosophical questions. That's why
evolution that pretends to answer the philosophical question of
life shouldn't be called science.
There are science in philosophy too.
Bullshit.
That is not bullshit....science can be used to explain many of the
philosophy matters as well! You also can use logic, or common sense
to explain too.
That's not possible for the real science and real philosophy. It may
happen to junk science and junk philosophy, but that's obviously a
stupid mistake. Science and philosophy are entirely different study
with different method of approach. Science studies the physical
objects. Philosophy studies the spiritual subjects. Science studies
what's within the mind. Philosophy studies what's beyond the mind.
They are entirely separated by the mind with philosophy dominating
over science because the philosophical truth is what science is
based on.
Not true....I can use science to tell me about all philosophical
questions. It really depends on what angle you regard a certain
subject or topic...although you can also rely upon common sense.
Wonderful. I suppose you want to show me an example of that.
Ah, there is nothing that can impress your damaged cells!!!
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
But, one can also have science not touching philosophical questions.
Science can answer the reason for your head injury as well,
but still have no cure for you yet. That is the reason you are
still loony.
Post by aaa
Other fine works by Amir D. Aczel
How to Beat the I.R.S. at Its Own Game: Strategies to Avoid and
Fight an Audit
God's Equation: Einstein, Relativity, and the Expanding Universe
Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, and the Stock Market
The Jesuit and the Skull: Teilhard de Chardin, Evolution, and
the Search for Peking Man
Why Science Does Not Disprove God
Science can disprove any pixie any time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bullshit.
I know you only are in possession of 1/8 of your brain.....
And it appears working better than yours.
That is your unprofessional opinion. Try asking a professional doctor...
Why bother? I think our discussion in here has already proved it.
Indeed, all of us here are impressed with insanity!!!
We're impressed by his ability not to be forcibly detained in an asylum,
not with his insanity.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
duke
2018-03-14 17:51:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of scripture is not to inform,
but to form, not to teach but to live.

*****
John Locke
2018-03-14 18:31:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
v***@gmail.com
2018-03-14 18:36:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
Not everything can be proven with scientific evidence:

When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?

When you say you love something, can you prove it?

When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
Street
2018-03-14 20:32:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
We can prove that you have a very low IQ.
aaa
2018-03-15 09:53:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
We can prove that you have a very low IQ.
Yet, you can't really answer his question with science. Your science
doesn't really work when it comes to life. Doctors only cure(kill)
disease. They don't save lives.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Vincent Maycock
2018-03-14 21:41:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
We look like we are, we sound like we are, we respond to drugs as if
we are, we can sue a doctor if he refuses to treat us because he
"doesn't believe us," and there's no reason for us to make up a story
like that.
Post by v***@gmail.com
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
Treating someone in a loving way can provide evidence (or "prove")
that we love some one.
Post by v***@gmail.com
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
We'll fall asleep faster than a non-tired person.
Street
2018-03-14 21:53:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
We can prove that you eat shit. Your pizza recipe proves it:

http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
v***@gmail.com
2018-03-14 22:00:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
I didn't write the Old Testament, idiot
Street
2018-03-14 22:04:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
I didn't write the Old Testament, idiot
But you follow the OT. And that must be the reason you eat shit.

Ezekiel 4:12 "And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake
it with dung that cometh out of man"
Gospel TT
2018-03-14 22:58:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by default
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
thatsomehowscience has now disproved the existence=
of God.
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the
evidence for=
Post by default
the
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim,
that God =
Post by default
is
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain
Post by default
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does
render the
Post by default
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
I didn't write the Old Testament, idiot
Moses & the profit's rote it.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-15 08:45:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
I didn't write the Old Testament, idiot
Yes, but then why should you believe if it were shit??????
v***@gmail.com
2018-03-14 22:05:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
FORGERY
Street
2018-03-14 22:07:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
aaa
2018-03-15 10:02:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really hurting
anyone except your own reputation.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-16 02:10:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence
for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus
any silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by default
We know so much about how the universe works, their authors
claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can explain all the
workings of the universe without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really hurting
anyone except your own reputation.
Whereas your reputation is beyond being hurt any further.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-16 10:40:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence
for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus
any silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by default
We know so much about how the universe works, their authors
claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can explain all the
workings of the universe without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really hurting
anyone except your own reputation.
Whereas your reputation is beyond being hurt any further.
But I do value my limited reputation to never damage it myself.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-17 02:57:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the
evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus
any silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by default
We know so much about how the universe works, their authors
claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can explain all the
workings of the universe without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we
know there was no creator needed.
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render
the probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very
low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really hurting
anyone except your own reputation.
Whereas your reputation is beyond being hurt any further.
But I do value my limited reputation to never damage it myself.
Where 'limited' = non existent.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-17 14:05:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the
evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus
any silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by default
We know so much about how the universe works, their authors
claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can explain all the
workings of the universe without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we
know there was no creator needed.
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render
the probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very
low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really hurting
anyone except your own reputation.
Whereas your reputation is beyond being hurt any further.
But I do value my limited reputation to never damage it myself.
Where 'limited' = non existent.
Only because you are too blind to see.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-03-19 02:35:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the
evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and
thus any silly notion of original sin. That just about does
away with Chritianity !
We know so much about how the universe works, their authors
claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can explain all the
workings of the universe without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain nature quite adequately through science to the point
where we know there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render
the probability that your god exists very, very, very, very,
very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really hurting
anyone except your own reputation.
Whereas your reputation is beyond being hurt any further.
But I do value my limited reputation to never damage it myself.
Where 'limited' = non existent.
Only because you are too blind to see.
Only because you are insane.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-19 08:34:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the
evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and
thus any silly notion of original sin. That just about does
away with Chritianity !
We know so much about how the universe works, their authors
claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can explain all the
workings of the universe without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain nature quite adequately through science to the point
where we know there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render
the probability that your god exists very, very, very, very,
very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really hurting
anyone except your own reputation.
Whereas your reputation is beyond being hurt any further.
But I do value my limited reputation to never damage it myself.
Where 'limited' = non existent.
Only because you are too blind to see.
Only because you are insane.
There is nothing insane in what I have said.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Peter Pan
2018-03-19 21:52:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Only because you are insane.
There is nothing insane in what I have said.
How many times have you repeated that?

Were you expecting different results this time?
--
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over
and over again, but expecting different results."
A. Einstein
aaa
2018-03-20 14:36:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Peter Pan
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Only because you are insane.
There is nothing insane in what I have said.
How many times have you repeated that?
Were you expecting different results this time?
I do expect a simple fact can be recognized.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Peter Pan
2018-03-20 17:20:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Peter Pan
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Only because you are insane.
There is nothing insane in what I have said.
How many times have you repeated that?
Were you expecting different results this time?
I do expect a simple fact can be recognized.
Depends. It's not clear whether you are insane or
trolling. I'm not sure, others have concluded one or the
other.

If you really think the answer is self-evident, that
would incline toward the insanity hypothesis.
--
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over
and over again, but expecting different results."
A. Einstein
Smiler
2018-03-20 00:16:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:51:29 -0500, duke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you
believe that—somehow—science has now disproved the
existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the
evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and
thus any silly notion of original sin. That just about does
away with Chritianity !
We know so much about how the universe works, their authors
claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can explain all
the workings of the universe without the need for a
Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain nature quite adequately through science to the point
where we know there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does
render the probability that your god exists very, very, very,
very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really
hurting anyone except your own reputation.
Whereas your reputation is beyond being hurt any further.
But I do value my limited reputation to never damage it myself.
Where 'limited' = non existent.
Only because you are too blind to see.
Only because you are insane.
There is nothing insane in what I have said.
So you say. Now prove it.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-03-20 14:37:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:51:29 -0500, duke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you
believe that—somehow—science has now disproved the
existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the
evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and
thus any silly notion of original sin. That just about does
away with Chritianity !
We know so much about how the universe works, their authors
claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can explain all
the workings of the universe without the need for a
Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain nature quite adequately through science to the point
where we know there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does
render the probability that your god exists very, very, very,
very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really
hurting anyone except your own reputation.
Whereas your reputation is beyond being hurt any further.
But I do value my limited reputation to never damage it myself.
Where 'limited' = non existent.
Only because you are too blind to see.
Only because you are insane.
There is nothing insane in what I have said.
So you say. Now prove it.
I don't have to. You have to prove otherwise if you disagree.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-16 07:22:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really hurting
anyone except your own reputation.
He expressed his horror about the behavior of Mad Joe, not hurting any reputation.
aaa
2018-03-16 10:43:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 11:31:42 AM UTC-7, John
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:51:29 -0500, duke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you
believe that—somehow—science has now disproved the
existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us
the evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve
and thus any silly notion of original sin. That just
about does away with Chritianity !
We know so much about how the universe works, their
authors claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can
explain all the workings of the universe without the
need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain nature quite adequately through science to the
point where we know there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional
ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does
render the probability that your god exists very, very,
very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove
it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really
hurting anyone except your own reputation.
He expressed his horror about the behavior of Mad Joe, not hurting any reputation.
He is making forgery. How in the world can you not know that?
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-17 12:37:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 11:31:42 AM UTC-7, John
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:51:29 -0500, duke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you
believe that—somehow—science has now disproved the
existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us
the evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve
and thus any silly notion of original sin. That just
about does away with Chritianity !
We know so much about how the universe works, their
authors claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can
explain all the workings of the universe without the
need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain nature quite adequately through science to the
point where we know there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional
ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does
render the probability that your god exists very, very,
very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove
it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really
hurting anyone except your own reputation.
He expressed his horror about the behavior of Mad Joe, not hurting any reputation.
He is making forgery. How in the world can you not know that?
Evidence?????????????????????????????????????????????
Street
2018-03-17 12:39:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 11:31:42 AM UTC-7, John
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:51:29 -0500, duke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you
believe that—somehow—science has now disproved the
existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us
the evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve
and thus any silly notion of original sin. That just
about does away with Chritianity !
We know so much about how the universe works, their
authors claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can
explain all the workings of the universe without the
need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain nature quite adequately through science to the
point where we know there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional
ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does
render the probability that your god exists very, very,
very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove
it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really
hurting anyone except your own reputation.
He expressed his horror about the behavior of Mad Joe, not hurting any reputation.
He is making forgery. How in the world can you not know that?
Evidence?????????????????????????????????????????????
LOL.
Street
2018-03-17 12:41:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 11:31:42 AM UTC-7, John
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:51:29 -0500, duke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you
believe that—somehow—science has now disproved the
existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us
the evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve
and thus any silly notion of original sin. That just
about does away with Chritianity !
We know so much about how the universe works, their
authors claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can
explain all the workings of the universe without the
need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain nature quite adequately through science to the
point where we know there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional
ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does
render the probability that your god exists very, very,
very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove
it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really
hurting anyone except your own reputation.
He expressed his horror about the behavior of Mad Joe, not hurting any reputation.
He is making shit pizza. How in the world can you not know that I like to eat it?
Eww!! You're just as disgusting as ArtyJoe!!!
aaa
2018-03-17 14:09:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Street
Post by Street
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 11:31:42 AM UTC-7, John
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:51:29 -0500, duke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:48:54 -0400, default
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:59:18 -0700 (PDT),
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you
believe that—somehow—science has now disproved the
existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us
the evidence for the existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve
and thus any silly notion of original sin. That just
about does away with Chritianity !
We know so much about how the universe works, their
authors claim, that God is simply unnecessary: we can
explain all the workings of the universe without the
need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can
explain nature quite adequately through science to the
point where we know there was no creator needed.
Science does not concern itself with delusional
ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does
render the probability that your god exists very, very,
very, very, very low.
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove
it?
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
http://tinyurl.com/y8rrvltw
YES I EAT SHIT SO WHAT!!!!
So eww!! You're disgusting, ArtyJoe!
I didn't know you are more nasty than Tim. You aren't really
hurting anyone except your own reputation.
He expressed his horror about the behavior of Mad Joe, not hurting any reputation.
He is making shit pizza. How in the world can you not know that I like to eat it?
Eww!! You're just as disgusting as ArtyJoe!!!
Thanks for proving my point.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-15 08:44:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Locke
Post by duke
Post by default
Post by v***@gmail.com
http://time.com/77676/why-science-does-not-disprove-god/
A number of recent books and articles would have you believe
that—somehow—science has now disproved the existence of God.
No way. Science is the very mechanism that gives us the evidence for the
existence of God.
...wrong. It was science that dispensed with Adam & Eve and thus any
silly notion of original sin. That just about does away with
Chritianity !
Post by duke
Post by default
We know
so much about how the universe works, their authors claim, that God is
simply unnecessary: we can explain all the workings of the universe
without the need for a Creator.
Wrong. Only God is supreme creator.
...wrong. There's absolutely no need for any god. We can explain
nature quite adequately through science to the point where we know
there was no creator needed.
Post by duke
Post by default
Science does not concern itself with delusional ideologies.
And it sure can't disprove God.
...science doesn't disprove god but it sure as hell does render the
probability that your god exists very, very, very, very, very low.
True.....
But then, how can you con people with non-existent pixie????????
Post by v***@gmail.com
When you tell the doctor you are in pain, can you prove it?
The party is in pain, if not, he won't spend money to see a doctor.
And when in pain, there is something wrong and in most cases, can be detected with symptoms or machines.
Post by v***@gmail.com
When you say you love something, can you prove it?
When we love our children, we show care and provide food. Those are the signs that the children know....is love.
Post by v***@gmail.com
When you say you are tired, can you prove it?
After 10 km running, I run of our breath and cannot proceed. Spectators understand I am tired....that is the proof!!!!

Any more question?
Loading...