Discussion:
How Historians Study The Past
(too old to reply)
v***@gmail.com
2018-03-13 04:43:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
HOW HISTORIANS STUDY THE PAST



https://www.kyrene.org/cms/lib2/AZ01001083/Centricity/Domain/2058/lesson4readingstudyguide.pdf


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method


https://www.britannica.com/topic/historiography/Methodology-of-historiography


The forms of evidence include oral history, witness testimony, documents, archaeological findings and numerous others.
Yap Honghor
2018-03-13 08:54:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
HOW HISTORIANS STUDY THE PAST
https://www.kyrene.org/cms/lib2/AZ01001083/Centricity/Domain/2058/lesson4readingstudyguide.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method
https://www.britannica.com/topic/historiography/Methodology-of-historiography
The forms of evidence include oral history, witness testimony, documents, archaeological findings and numerous others.
Oral and witness testimony are not genuine evidence or totally lacking truth!
Even document or archaeological finding may not tell the right/true history because the writers could have motives or prejudices. You have no way to know if the recording parties were impartial!!!!
v***@gmail.com
2018-03-13 09:31:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
HOW HISTORIANS STUDY THE PAST
https://www.kyrene.org/cms/lib2/AZ01001083/Centricity/Domain/2058/lesson4readingstudyguide.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method
https://www.britannica.com/topic/historiography/Methodology-of-historiography
The forms of evidence include oral history, witness testimony, documents, archaeological findings and numerous others.
Oral and witness testimony are not genuine evidence or totally lacking truth!
Even document or archaeological finding may not tell the right/true history because the writers could have motives or prejudices. You have no way to know if the recording parties were impartial!!!!
WRONG, LIAR


https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/discovery
Yap Honghor
2018-03-14 02:24:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
HOW HISTORIANS STUDY THE PAST
https://www.kyrene.org/cms/lib2/AZ01001083/Centricity/Domain/2058/lesson4readingstudyguide.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method
https://www.britannica.com/topic/historiography/Methodology-of-historiography
The forms of evidence include oral history, witness testimony, documents, archaeological findings and numerous others.
Oral and witness testimony are not genuine evidence or totally lacking truth!
Even document or archaeological finding may not tell the right/true history because the writers could have motives or prejudices. You have no way to know if the recording parties were impartial!!!!
WRONG, LIAR
No....you even have motive when you posted the above information!
That is prejudice or agenda by itself....
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/discovery
Yap Honghor
2018-03-14 02:38:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
HOW HISTORIANS STUDY THE PAST
https://www.kyrene.org/cms/lib2/AZ01001083/Centricity/Domain/2058/lesson4readingstudyguide.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method
https://www.britannica.com/topic/historiography/Methodology-of-historiography
The forms of evidence include oral history, witness testimony, documents, archaeological findings and numerous others.
Oral and witness testimony are not genuine evidence or totally lacking truth!
Even document or archaeological finding may not tell the right/true history because the writers could have motives or prejudices. You have no way to know if the recording parties were impartial!!!!
WRONG, LIAR
https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/discovery
In the court room:

Lawyer: "You saw the murder, don't you?"
Eye witness: "Yes, I did."
Lawyer: "Did you see this person at the scene, murdering the victim?"
Eye witness: "It was quite dark, I saw someone that looked like him."
Lawyer: "No, you have to be very specific! Was this the man?"
Eye witness: "May well be, he had the same height, and same color in the dark!"
Lawyer: "So, this was the man then?"
Eye witness: "If you said so, I guess this is the man!"
Lawyer: "No, I did not say so. It must be your own eyes!"
Eye witness: "Yes, my eyes said this looked to be the same man!"

Judge: "Very well, this man was identified to be the murderer....court dismiss, sentence to be carried out after 2 weeks!"

Mad Joe, is this what your eye witness can do???
A justice joke of the century?
Malte Runz
2018-03-13 12:04:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 01:54:55 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
HOW HISTORIANS STUDY THE PAST
https://www.kyrene.org/cms/lib2/AZ01001083/Centricity/Domain/2058/lesson4readingstudyguide.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method
https://www.britannica.com/topic/historiography/Methodology-of-historiography
The forms of evidence include oral history, witness testimony, documents, archaeological findings and numerous others.
Oral and witness testimony are not genuine evidence or totally lacking truth!
Even document or archaeological finding may not tell the right/true history because the writers could have motives or prejudices. You have no way to know if the recording parties were impartial!!!!
Imagine a historian finding Joe's old messages in the future...

'Interesting. McCain once called Trump a dictator. I have the proof
right here. Some guy wrote:
"McCain actually called Pres Trump a "dictator" because he criticizes
the media."'

Guess that settles it..
--
Malte Runz
v***@gmail.com
2018-03-13 12:50:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 01:54:55 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
HOW HISTORIANS STUDY THE PAST
https://www.kyrene.org/cms/lib2/AZ01001083/Centricity/Domain/2058/lesson4readingstudyguide.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method
https://www.britannica.com/topic/historiography/Methodology-of-historiography
The forms of evidence include oral history, witness testimony, documents, archaeological findings and numerous others.
Oral and witness testimony are not genuine evidence or totally lacking truth!
Even document or archaeological finding may not tell the right/true history because the writers could have motives or prejudices. You have no way to know if the recording parties were impartial!!!!
Imagine a historian finding Joe's old messages in the future...
'Interesting. McCain once called Trump a dictator. I have the proof
"McCain actually called Pres Trump a "dictator" because he criticizes
the media."'
Guess that settles it..
--
Malte Runz
What the fk did you say?
Cloud Hobbit
2018-03-13 19:15:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
What the fk did you say?
_____________

He said you're a moron.

Your a rumdum who can't spell FUCK.
v***@gmail.com
2018-03-13 19:47:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
What the fk did you say?
_____________
He said you're a moron.
Your a rumdum who can't spell FUCK.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Gospel TT
2018-03-13 21:07:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by v***@gmail.com
What the fk did you say?
_____________
He said you're a moron.
Your a rumdum who can't spell FUCK.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
That don't prove nothing liar.
Gospel TT
2018-03-13 20:35:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:15:44 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by v***@gmail.com
What the fk did you say?
_____________
He said you're a moron.
Your a rumdum who can't spell FUCK.
Lol typical vtandosky
Malte Runz
2018-03-14 03:17:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Malte Runz
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 01:54:55 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
HOW HISTORIANS STUDY THE PAST
https://www.kyrene.org/cms/lib2/AZ01001083/Centricity/Domain/2058/lesson4readingstudyguide.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method
https://www.britannica.com/topic/historiography/Methodology-of-historiography
The forms of evidence include oral history, witness testimony, documents, archaeological findings and numerous others.
Oral and witness testimony are not genuine evidence or totally lacking truth!
Even document or archaeological finding may not tell the right/true history because the writers could have motives or prejudices. You have no way to know if the recording parties were impartial!!!!
Imagine a historian finding Joe's old messages in the future...
'Interesting. McCain once called Trump a dictator. I have the proof
"McCain actually called Pres Trump a "dictator" because he criticizes
the media."'
Guess that settles it..
--
Malte Runz
What the fk did you say?
What the fuck does "fk" mean?
--
Malte Runz
Loading...