Discussion:
Has science proven the presence of God?
Add Reply
Jahnu
2018-06-08 23:58:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Science has proven the presence of Intelligent Design in nature.

After the electron-microscope was invented, it enabled scientists to
look into a living cell, and what they saw there was later dubbed as
‘irreducible complexity.’

Irreducible complexity means a unit consisting of several working
parts whose functions are all inter-dependent.

Like a car engine - the cylinders only work in connection with the
pistons, the pistons only work in connection with the spark-plugs, and
the spark-plugs only work in connection with the electric system and
so on.

So a car engine only works as a complete unit, a unit that is
obviously designed by human intelligence. The idea that it has
designed itself and arose by gradual evolution, is simply too idiotic
to be even taken seriously.

Still, this is what evolutionists propose, and indeed, this ludicrous
idea is being taught in all the world’s educational institutions as a
scientific fact.

Anyway, so a single living cell is like a car engine - an irreducible
complexity, which will only work when all it’s parts work co-jointly
together.

To suggest that a cell created itself accidentally by gradual
evolution, is no less ridiculous than saying that a car-engine
assembled itself by gradual mutations over long spans of time.

"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are
great con-men, And the story they are telling may be the GREATEST HOAX
EVER." -- Dr.T.N.Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission

"We must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian
accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only
a variety of wishful speculations." -- Franklin Harold, Emeritus
Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Colorado State
University, in an Oxford University Press text.

"The probability that life arose by a coincidence can be likened to
the probability that a voluminous encyclopedia be the result of an
explosion in a print shop." -- Biologist Edwin Conklin

"From my earliest training as a scientist I was very strongly
brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind
of deliberate creation. That notion has had to be painfully shed. I am
quite uncomfortable in this situation, the state of mind I now find
myself in. But there is no logical way out of it. I now find myself
driven to this position by logic. There is no other way in which we
can understand the precise ordering of the chemicals of life except to
invoke the creations on a cosmic scale. . . We were hoping as
scientists that there would be a way round our conclusion, but there
isn’t."

--Sir Frederick Hoyle and Chandra Wickramsinghe, There Must Be A God,
Daily Express, Aug. 14, 1981. & Hoyle On Evolution. Nature, Nov. 12,
1981, 105

"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a
superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry
and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about
in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so
overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question." - Fred
Hoyle, astrophysicist

"I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not
acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the
existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who
would deny the advances of science." - Wernher von Braun




https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das


Cloud Hobbit
2018-06-09 00:07:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Nope.

Science has found nothing that indicates anything about the existence of any God or gods.

You're lying again.
b***@m.nu
2018-06-09 02:33:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 17:07:52 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Nope.
Science has found nothing that indicates anything about the existence of any God or gods.
You're lying again.
It is a little lying butch that craves attention, and will tell any
lie or come up with any bullshit just to get that attention.
JTEM
2018-06-09 06:18:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Science has found nothing that indicates anything about
the existence of any God or gods.
You're spewing dogma. Not particularly well
thought out dogma, either.

The "Simulated Universe" theory is nothing less
than God under a different name.

As is "The Observer" in the Copenhagen Interpretation.

And the Brain Universe.

There's others, but you get the picture (speaking
rhetorically). Science "Sees" God all the time,
uses God to explain everything. It's just careful
to use a different name.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/59272128411
G***@hotmail.com
2018-06-16 06:31:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
2018 Physical Constants Adjustment

hbar = e^2*z0
hbar = [(1.6021766(34) x 10^-19 A-s)^2] * (3.767303134… x 10^2 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3)
hbar = 9.6705540(00) x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s

hbar = e^2/e0*c
hbar = [(1.6021766(34) x 10^-19 A-s)^2] / (8.854187817… x 10^-12 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3) * (2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s)
hbar = 9.6705540(00) x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s

hbar = e^2*u0*c
hbar = [(1.6021766(34) x 10^-19 A-s)^2] * (1.256637061… x 10^-6 kg-m/A^2-s^2) * (2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s)
hbar = 9.6705540(00) x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s

hbar = h*(2*alpha)
hbar = (6.6260701(50) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s-rad) * [(2.00000000 x 10^0 rad/sr) * (7.2973525(66) x 10^-3 sr)]
hbar = 9.6705540(00) x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s

http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/

001) dark radiance = 2.0774489(19) x 10^125 kg/s^3-sr
002) dark irradiance = 1.5159877(20) x 10^123 kg/s^3
003) radiant density = 5.0567907(21) x 10^114 kg/m-s^2
004) dark density = 8.5349738(01) x 10^105 /m^3
005) dark matter density = 5.6264384(79) x 10^97 kg/m^3
006) inverse luminous efficacy = 2.2239020(52) x 10^96 kg-m^2/cd-sr-s^3
007) electric current density = 4.0995226(38) x 10^95 A/m^2
008) thermal transfer = 3.5326953(68) x 10^91 kg/s^3-K
009) electric charge density = 1.3674535(60) x 10^87 A-s/m^3
010) angular acceleration = 5.4782038(95) x 10^85 rad/s^2
011) molar concentration = 1.4172657(44) x 10^82 mol/m^3
012) surface tension = 2.4744247(42) x 10^79 kg/s^2
013) dynamic viscosity = 8.2537925(03) x 10^70 kg/m-s
014) inverse dark area = 4.1763939(85) x 10^70 /m^2
015) electric field strength = 7.5572384(43) x 10^62 kg-m/A-s^3
016) surface density = 2.7531688(28) x 10^62 kg/m^2
017) absorption rate = 5.5063376(58) x 10^60 m^2/s^3
018) magnetic field strength = 2.0060075(27) x 10^60 A/m
019) thermal conductivity = 1.7286435(82) x 10^56 kg-m/s^3-K
020) radiant intensity = 4.9742647(04) x 10^54 kg-m^2/s^3-sr
021) magnetic flux density = 2.5208234(03) x 10^54 kg/A-s^2
022) dark power = 3.6298963(30) x 10^52 kg-m^2/s^3
023) field acceleration = 1.8367165(39) x 10^52 m/s^2
024) electric flux density = 6.6913208(56) x 10^51 A-s/m^2
025) surface concentration = 6.9350653(75) x 10^46 mol/m^2
026) dark force = 1.2108030(85) x 10^44 kg-m/s^2
027) dark frequency = 6.1266269(04) x 10^43 /s
028) angular velocity = 8.9416313(11) x 10^41 rad/s
029) inverse luminous intensity = 4.4708156(57) x 10^41 /cd
030) dark matter flow rate = 4.0388043(55) x 10^35 kg/s
031) wave number = 2.0436227(60) x 10^35 /m
032) electric conductivity = 5.4246305(31) x 10^32 A^2-s^3/kg-m^3
033) molar dark energy = 3.5679905(07) x 10^32 kg-m^2/s^2-mol
034) dark temperature = 4.2913061(04) x 10^31 K
035) dark luminance = 9.3414587(09) x 10^28 cd/m^2
036) electric potential = 3.6979615(76) x 10^27 kg-m^2/A-s^3
037) dark matter field = 1.3472001(20) x 10^27 kg/m
038) luminous flux density = 6.8167917(68) x 10^26 cd-sr/m^2
039) electric current = 9.8159384(71) x 10^24 A
040) Avogadro constant = 6.0221407(58) x 10^23 /mol
041) thermal conductance = 8.4587215(23) x 10^20 kg-m^2/s^3-K
042) magnetic potential = 1.2335072(07) x 10^19 kg-m/A-s^2
043) dark displacement = 4.4937758(92) x 10^18 kg-s/m^2
044) luminous density = 2.2738369(78) x 10^18 cd-sr-s/m^3
045) dark absorption = 8.987551787… x 10^16 m^2/s^2
046) electric displacement = 3.2742446(35) x 10^16 A-s/m
047) molar dark matter = 3.9699248(38) x 10^15 kg/mol
048) Josephson constant = 4.8359784(84) x 10^14 A-s^2-rad^2/kg-m^2-sr
049) Josephson quantum = 2.4179892(42) x 10^14 A-s^2-rad/kg-m^2
050) Coulomb constant = 8.987551787… x 10^9 kg-m^3/A^2-s^4-(4pi)
051) dark energy = 5.9247876(31) x 10^8 kg-m^2/s^2
052) speed of light in vacuum = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s
053) inverse dark matter = 1.5169407(49) x 10^8 /kg
054) Faraday constant = 9.6485332(08) x 10^4 A-s/mol
055) von Klitzing constant = 2.5812807(46) x 10^4 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3-rad
056) inverse conductance q. = 1.2906403(73) x 10^4 kg-m^2-sr/A^2-s^3-rad^2
057) impedance of vacuum = 3.767303134… x 10^2 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3
058) inverse fine-structure constant = 1.3703599(91) x 10^2 /sr
059) inverse fine-structure angle = 6.8517999(58) x 10^1 /rad
060) molar gas constant = 8.3144628(25) x 10^0 kg-m^2/s^2-mol-K
061) spin two = 2.00000000 x 10^0 rad/sr
062) dark momentum = 1.9762964(25) x 10^0 kg-m/s
063) relative permeability = 1.00000000 x 10^0 rad/rad
064) dielectric constant = 1.00000000 x 10^0 sr/sr
065) spin one-half = 5.00000000 x 10^-1 sr/rad
066) fine-structure angle = 1.4594705(13) x 10^-2 rad
067) second radiation = 1.4387768(41) x 10^-2 m-K/rad
068) fine-structure constant = 7.2973525(66) x 10^-3 sr
069) conductance quantum = 7.7480917(31) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3-rad^2/kg-m^2-sr
070) electric conductance = 3.8740458(65) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3-rad/kg-m^2
071) magnetic constant = 1.256637061… x 10^-6 kg-m/A^2-s^2
072) dark matter = 6.5922152(90) x 10^-9 kg
073) radiant distribution = 3.335640952… x 10^-9 s/m
074) inverse dark energy = 1.6878242(09) x 10^-9 s^2/kg-m^2
075) density of states = 1.6878242(09) x 10^-9 s^2/kg-m^2
076) molar Planck constant = 3.9903127(10) x 10^-10 kg-m^2/s-mol-rad
077) atomic permittivity = 1.112650056… x 10^-10 A^2-s^4-(4pi)/kg-m^3
078) Newtonian constant = 6.671281903… x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
079) magnetic pole strength = 4.8032047(13) x 10^-11 A-m
080) magnetic exposure = 2.4304070(23) x 10^-11 A-s/kg
081) electric constant = 8.854187817… x 10^-12 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3
082) magnetic flux = 4.1356676(96) x 10^-15 kg-m^2/A-s^2-rad
083) specific heat = 2.0943627(81) x 10^-15 m^2/s^2-K
084) magnetic flux quantum = 2.0678338(48) x 10^-15 kg-m^2-sr/A-s^2-rad^2
085) first radiation = 3.7417718(52) x 10^-16 kg-m^4-(2pi)/s^3-rad
086) dark molality = 2.5189393(78) x 10^-16 mol/kg
087) first radiation spectral radiance = 1.1910429(72) x 10^-16 kg-m^4/s^3-sr
088) elementary charge = 1.6021766(34) x 10^-19 A-s
089) thermal resistance = 1.1822117(53) x 10^-21 s^3-K/kg-m^2
090) Boltzmann constant = 1.3806490(35) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K
091) amount of substance = 1.6605390(68) x 10^-24 mol
092) inverse electric current = 1.0187512(92) x 10^-25 /A
093) kinematic viscosity = 1.4669657(43) x 10^-27 m^2/s
094) electric resistivity = 1.8434435(20) x 10^-33 kg-m^3/A^2-s^3
095) relative expansion = 2.3302928(66) x 10^-32 /K
096) Planck constant = 6.6260701(50) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s-rad
097) reduced Planck constant = 9.6705540(00) x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s
098) dark length = 4.8932710(07) x 10^-36 m
099) absorption-emission = 2.4759802(95) x 10^-36 s/kg
100) dark inductance = 6.1490656(98) x 10^-42 kg-m^2/A^2-s^2
101) luminous intensity = 2.2367283(22) x 10^-42 cd
102) dark moment = 3.2257495(95) x 10^-44 kg-m
103) dark time = 1.6322195(16) x 10^-44 s
104) luminous flux = 1.6322195(16) x 10^-44 cd-sr
105) magnetic moment = 2.3503382(36) x 10^-46 A-m^2
106) dark capacitance = 4.3325940(55) x 10^-47 A^2-s^4/kg-m^2
107) electric moment = 7.8398844(71) x 10^-55 A-s-m
108) dark area = 2.3944101(15) x 10^-71 m^2
109) dark fluidity = 1.2115642(59) x 10^-71 m-s/kg
110) inertial moment = 1.5784466(97) x 10^-79 kg-m^2
111) molar volume = 7.0558397(69) x 10^-83 m^3/mol
112) electric charge volume = 7.3128626(05) x 10^-88 m^3/A-s
113) luminous dark energy = 2.6641405(48) x 10^-88 cd-sr-s
114) electric current volume = 2.4393083(98) x 10^-96 m^2/A
115) luminous efficacy = 4.4966009(15) x 10^-97 cd-sr-s^3/kg-m^2
116) dark matter volume = 1.7773232(64) x 10^-98 m^3/kg
117) dark volume = 1.1716497(59) x 10^-106 m^3
118) radiant volume = 1.9775388(29) x 10^-115 m-s^2/kg
119) inverse dark irradiance = 6.5963595(02) x 10^-124 s^3/kg
120) inverse dark radiance = 4.8135960(94) x 10^-126 s^3-sr/kg

http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/

* dark temperature: [(hbar*c^5/G)^1/2]/k = 4.2913061(04) x 10^31 K
* electric current: e/[(hbar*G/c^5)^1/2] = 9.8159384(71) x 10^24 A
* fine-structure angle: e^2/(e0*h*c) = 1.4594705(13) x 10^-2 rad
* fine-structure constant: e^2/(2*e0*h*c) = 7.2973525(66) x 10-3 sr
* dark matter: (hbar*c/G)^1/2 = 6.5922152(90) x 10^-9 kg
* amount of substance: [(hbar*c/G)^1/2]/M = 1.6605390(68) x 10^-24 mol
* dark length: (hbar*G/c^3)^1/2 = 4.8932710(07) x 10^-36 m
* luminous intensity: [(hbar*G/c^5)^1/2]/alpha = 2.2367283(22) x 10^-42 cd
* dark time: (hbar*G/c^5)^1/2 = 1.6322195(16) x 10^-44 s
Jahnu
2018-06-17 00:50:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by G***@hotmail.com
2018 Physical Constants Adjustment
"Science is ghastly silent about all and sundry that is really near to
our heart, that really matters to us. It cannot tell us about red and
blue, bitter and sweet, beautiful and ugly, good or bad, God and
eternity. Science sometimes pretends to answer questions in these
domains, but the answers are often so silly that we are not inclined
to take them seriously."

--Erwin Schrodinger, a Nobel prize winning physicist



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
b***@m.nu
2018-06-09 02:32:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Science has proven the presence of Intelligent Design in nature.
no it has not, it has done nothing even like that.



<snip crap>
Christopher A. Lee
2018-06-09 06:03:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by b***@m.nu
Post by Jahnu
Science has proven the presence of Intelligent Design in nature.
no it has not, it has done nothing even like that.
<snip crap>
What's wrong with these morons, that they come here and lie so
transparently and incessantly over so many years?

It's obvious that religion brings out this kind of antisocial
behaviour, but why?
b***@m.nu
2018-06-09 19:40:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 01:03:13 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by b***@m.nu
Post by Jahnu
Science has proven the presence of Intelligent Design in nature.
no it has not, it has done nothing even like that.
<snip crap>
What's wrong with these morons, that they come here and lie so
transparently and incessantly over so many years?
It's obvious that religion brings out this kind of antisocial
behaviour, but why?
well when a sanctimonious moron tries to push its way into society by
using fairy dust all they have is the lie after lie after lie. Pretty
soon their entire life is built up on these lies, and yet after years
and years this lie becomes a reality for them and it is no longer a
lie, at least not to them. It makes them comfortable and it makes the
feel secure, christians aka catholics (which all chtistians are
catholic anyway) are complete fucking morons
Jahnu
2018-06-11 02:40:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by b***@m.nu
no it has not, it has done nothing even like that.
Contrary your retarded, atheist perception of the world, here is what
science has to say:

"The probability that life arose by a coincidence can be likened to
the probability that a voluminous encyclopedia be the result of an
explosion in a print shop." - Biologist Edwin Conklin

"From my earliest training as a scientist I was very strongly
brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind
of deliberate creation. That notion has had to be painfully shed. I am
quite uncomfortable in this situation, the state of mind I now find
myself in. But there is no logical way out of it. I now find myself
driven to this position by logic. There is no other way in which we
can understand the precise ordering of the chemicals of life except to
invoke the creations on a cosmic scale. . . We were hoping as
scientists that there would be a way round our conclusion, but there
isn’t."

--Sir Frederick Hoyle and Chandra Wickramsinghe, There Must Be A God,
Daily Express, Aug. 14, 1981. & Hoyle On Evolution. Nature, Nov. 12,
1981, 105

The hypothesis that life evolved from inorganic matter is still to
this day a matter of belief.

- Matematician J. W. N. Sullivan

"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a
superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry
and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about
in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so
overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question." - Fred
Hoyle, astrophysicist

"I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not
acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the
existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who
would deny the advances of science." - Wernher von Braun

"The gift of mental power comes from God, Divine Being, and if we
concetrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this great
power." - Nikola Tesla

"The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only
proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful
Being." - Isaac Newton

God created everything by number, weight and measure. - Isaac Newton
"The cardinal error of science lies in shutting the Creator out of His
Creation." - Walter Russell, Doctor of Science

"It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism,
but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for
while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may
sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the
chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to
Providence and Deity." - Sir Francis Bacon

Religion and science are opposed ... but only in the same sense as
that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the
two, one can grasp everything. - Sir William Bragg, Nobel Prize in
Physics 1915

"My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely
superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our
weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality." -
Albert Einstein

"Then we shall...be able to take part in the discussion of the
question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the
answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason - for
then we would know the mind of God." - Steven Hawkings





https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
Andrew
2018-06-11 08:04:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Post by b***@m.nu
no it has not, it has done nothing even like that.
Contrary your retarded, atheist perception of the world, here is what
If there are any of our atheist friends here who are not afraid
of the truth ---> please read and comment on the following.

Why would you be afraid of the truth anyway? So take some
time and consider if these statements by scientists are correct.

Thank you.

__________________________________________________
Post by Jahnu
"The probability that life arose by a coincidence can be likened to
the probability that a voluminous encyclopedia be the result of an
explosion in a print shop." - Biologist Edwin Conklin
"From my earliest training as a scientist I was very strongly
brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind
of deliberate creation. That notion has had to be painfully shed. I am
quite uncomfortable in this situation, the state of mind I now find
myself in. But there is no logical way out of it. I now find myself
driven to this position by logic. There is no other way in which we
can understand the precise ordering of the chemicals of life except to
invoke the creations on a cosmic scale. . . We were hoping as
scientists that there would be a way round our conclusion, but there
isn't."
--Sir Frederick Hoyle and Chandra Wickramsinghe, There Must Be A God,
Daily Express, Aug. 14, 1981. & Hoyle On Evolution. Nature, Nov. 12,
1981, 105
The hypothesis that life evolved from inorganic matter is still to
this day a matter of belief.
- Matematician J. W. N. Sullivan
"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a
superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry
and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about
in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so
overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question." - Fred
Hoyle, astrophysicist
"I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not
acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the
existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who
would deny the advances of science." - Wernher von Braun
"The gift of mental power comes from God, Divine Being, and if we
concetrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this great
power." - Nikola Tesla
"The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only
proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful
Being." - Isaac Newton
God created everything by number, weight and measure. - Isaac Newton
"The cardinal error of science lies in shutting the Creator out of His
Creation." - Walter Russell, Doctor of Science
"It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism,
but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for
while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may
sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the
chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to
Providence and Deity." - Sir Francis Bacon
Religion and science are opposed ... but only in the same sense as
that in which my thumb and forefinger are opposed - and between the
two, one can grasp everything. - Sir William Bragg, Nobel Prize in
Physics 1915
"My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely
superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our
weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality." -
Albert Einstein
"Then we shall...be able to take part in the discussion of the
question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the
answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason - for
then we would know the mind of God." - Steven Hawkings
Jahnu
2018-06-12 00:03:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 01:04:49 -0700, "Andrew"
Post by Andrew
If there are any of our atheist friends here who are not afraid
of the truth ---> please read and comment on the following.
Why would you be afraid of the truth anyway? So take some
time and consider if these statements by scientists are correct.
Thank you.
Don't hold your breath. The last thing an atheist wants is the truth.
As a die-hard atheist one has to dedicate oneself to untruth and
reject all logic, reason, common sense and empiric observations.

That's why atheists are such unhappy and frustrated people.

Krishna says:

The sky, due to its subtle nature, does not mix with anything,
although it is all-pervading. Similarly, the soul situated in Brahman
vision does not mix with the body, though situated in that body. (Bg.
13.33)

O son of Bharata, as the sun alone illuminates all this universe, so
does the living entity, one within the body, illuminate the entire
body by consciousness. (Bg. 13.34)

Those who see with eyes of knowledge the difference between the body
and the knower of the body, and can also understand the process of
liberation from bondage in material nature, attain to the supreme
goal. (Bg. 13.35)



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
Cloud Hobbit
2018-06-12 07:39:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Don't hold your breath. The last thing an atheist >wants is the truth.
As a die-hard atheist one has to dedicate oneself to >untruth and
reject all logic, reason, common sense and empiric >observations.
You are confusing atheists with theists. No surprise really since you usually get things wrong or just outright lie.

It is precisely because atheists are determined to use reason and empirical evidence that they are atheists in the first place.

Seriously, how can anyone with a fully functioning brain believe that some God is or has ever done any of the nonsense attributed to them?

Try looking at any religion you are unfamiliar with and see how nonsensical they seem. That's the problem with all of them.

They all claim to be the one true religion and pray to the true God(s).

Not one of them can prove their God or gods actually exist.

They all lie.

That doesn't mean they're not doing some things that are useful, but insisting that there is a God or gods is not one of them.

Theists want atheists to be something we're not, an evil or subhuman group they can persecute and not feel guilty.

They all claim honesty as a virtue but never cease to evade, lie, quote mine, or play word games because they have nothing that reasonably resembles evidence for their gods or the other myths they believe.

Why you think that being a pompous, nasty, little turd is going to make anybody want to join your cult demonstrates your shallow thinking. The fact you use crackpots and easily debunked sources does nothing to inspire trust in you.

Why don't you just fuck off and enjoy life? How can you stand to be so pissed off all the time?

Maybe it's all your exposure to this NG? Is it giving you a crisis of faith?

Seeing every one of your bullshit claims debunked or ignored can't be good for your ego.

But I suppose knowing that some of your "proofs" are complete quackery and fraud can wear you down as well.

Go smell the flowers.
Take a walk.
Just take a few deep breaths, adjust your shakras and chill.

It's over.
You lost.
b***@m.nu
2018-06-12 08:07:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:39:32 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Don't hold your breath. The last thing an atheist >wants is the truth.
As a die-hard atheist one has to dedicate oneself to >untruth and
reject all logic, reason, common sense and empiric >observations.
You are confusing atheists with theists. No surprise really since you usually get things wrong or just outright lie.
It is precisely because atheists are determined to use reason and empirical evidence that they are atheists in the first place.
Seriously, how can anyone with a fully functioning brain believe that some God is or has ever done any of the nonsense attributed to them?
Try looking at any religion you are unfamiliar with and see how nonsensical they seem. That's the problem with all of them.
They all claim to be the one true religion and pray to the true God(s).
Not one of them can prove their God or gods actually exist.
They all lie.
That doesn't mean they're not doing some things that are useful, but insisting that there is a God or gods is not one of them.
Theists want atheists to be something we're not, an evil or subhuman group they can persecute and not feel guilty.
They all claim honesty as a virtue but never cease to evade, lie, quote mine, or play word games because they have nothing that reasonably resembles evidence for their gods or the other myths they believe.
Why you think that being a pompous, nasty, little turd is going to make anybody want to join your cult demonstrates your shallow thinking. The fact you use crackpots and easily debunked sources does nothing to inspire trust in you.
Why don't you just fuck off and enjoy life? How can you stand to be so pissed off all the time?
Maybe it's all your exposure to this NG? Is it giving you a crisis of faith?
Seeing every one of your bullshit claims debunked or ignored can't be good for your ego.
But I suppose knowing that some of your "proofs" are complete quackery and fraud can wear you down as well.
Go smell the flowers.
Take a walk.
Just take a few deep breaths, adjust your shakras and chill.
It's over.
You lost.
What is funny is janet posted this little quote...
"We must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian
accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only
a variety of wishful speculations."
Frank harold

So I contacted frank and we had a lengthy discussion about how he is
an atheist and poor old janet did not understand what the quote even
meant. Just like every other quote it posts. It is a complete moron
and will say anything or do anything it can so that it can make itself
feel that believing in fairies is the correct thing... Ask janet if it
has prayed to its god of shit lately...
TT Liams
2018-06-13 01:52:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Don't hold your breath. The last thing an atheist wants is
to smell Krishna breath cause it stink's so bad lol
%
2018-06-13 02:02:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by TT Liams
Post by Jahnu
Don't hold your breath. The last thing an atheist wants is
to smell Krishna breath cause it stink's so bad lol
no it doesn't
TT Liams
2018-06-13 22:36:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by %
Post by TT Liams
Post by Jahnu
Don't hold your breath. The last thing an atheist wants is
to smell Krishna breath cause it stink's so bad lol
no it doesn't
You just can't tell can't tell cause your breath smell's like poop lol
Jahnu
2018-06-14 11:13:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:36:28 -0400, TT Liams
You just can't tell cause mah brearth smell's like mah momma's twat.
Ah is an inbread bastard and Ah loves it.
http://reluctant-messenger.com/reincarnation-proof.htm

http://shiftfrequency.com/scientific-proof-of-reincarnation-dr-ian-stevensons-life-work/

"The religion and philosophy of the Hebrews are those of a wilder and
ruder tribe, wanting the civility and intellectual refinements and
subtlety of Vedic culture." - Henry David Thoreau



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
TT Liams
2018-06-14 21:50:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
I'm a rumdum Krishna that's gone to hell.
I no.
%
2018-06-14 22:09:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
I'm a rumdum Krishna that's gone to hell.
I no.
no you don't
Jahnu
2018-06-16 04:26:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 17:50:59 -0400, TT Liams, slack jaw, glaced eyes,
I no.
I no? hahaha :)

Get an education, retard.

--but, but Ah no. Ah seen it on TV.

Krishna says:

My dear Arjuna, because you are never envious of Me, I shall impart to
you this most confidential knowledge and realization, knowing which
you shall be relieved of the miseries of material existence. (Bg. 9.1)

This knowledge is the king of education, the most secret of all
secrets. It is the purest knowledge, and because it gives direct
perception of the self by realization, it is the perfection of
religion. It is everlasting, and it is joyfully performed. (Bg. 9.2)



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
TT Liams
2018-06-17 22:31:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 17:50:59 -0400, TT Liams, slack jaw, glaced eyes,
I no.
I no? hahaha :)
Liar you don't no nothing!!
Post by Jahnu
Get an education, retard.
I got a doctor degree, rumdum!!
Post by Jahnu
--but, but Ah no. Ah seen it on TV.
Don't believe what you see on TV, rumdum.
Krishna is satin the devil!!!
Street
2018-06-18 05:55:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by TT Liams
Post by Jahnu
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 17:50:59 -0400, TT Liams, slack jaw, glaced eyes,
I no.
I no? hahaha :)
Liar you don't no nothing!!
Post by Jahnu
Get an education, retard.
I got a doctor degree, rumdum!!
Post by Jahnu
--but, but Ah no. Ah seen it on TV.
Don't believe what you see on TV, rumdum.
Jesper's such a gullible idiot.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-06-18 09:18:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
Jesper's such a gullible idiot.
Is that the same as pathological liar?

Or is he more of annoyance troll, who says anything to annoy people?

Could he be as BATSHIT CRAZY as he seems?

Why doesn't he think his claims and his references won't be checked and debunked?

Can he really be such a slow learner?

Maybe he gets grumpy when he has latrine duty.

Maybe sacred cows keep shitting in his room.

Relax Jesper, have a nice steak and some wine.
You'll feel better.
TT Liams
2018-06-19 22:46:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
Post by TT Liams
Post by Jahnu
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 17:50:59 -0400, TT Liams, slack jaw, glaced eyes,
I no.
I no? hahaha :)
Liar you don't no nothing!!
Post by Jahnu
Get an education, retard.
I got a doctor degree, rumdum!!
Post by Jahnu
--but, but Ah no. Ah seen it on TV.
Don't believe what you see on TV, rumdum.
Jesper's such a gullible idiot.
I no lol I been teaching him
Jahnu
2018-06-20 09:07:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by TT Liams
I got a doctor degree, rumdum!!
hahaha :) You are a shameless liar.

Look, God talks about you in the Bhagavad Gita.


Krishna says:

Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My
transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord of all that be. (Bg. 9.11)

Those who are thus bewildered are attracted by demonic and atheistic
views. In that deluded condition, their hopes for liberation, their
fruitive activities, and their culture of knowledge are all defeated.
(Bg. 9.12)



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
TT Liams
2018-06-20 19:28:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by TT Liams
I got a doctor degree, rumdum!!
Krishna say's lie's cause he's really satin that's the father of
lie's!!!!!1
Jahnu
2018-06-20 21:18:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by TT Liams
Krishna say's lie's cause he's really satin that's the father of
lie's!!!!!1
Satin? And you're a doctor? hahaha :) Talk about liar...

Look, God talks about you,

Krishna says:

Bewildered by false ego, strength, pride, lust and anger, the demons
become envious of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is situated
in their own bodies and in the bodies of others, and blaspheme against
the real religion. (Bg. 16.18)



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
duke
2018-06-21 18:25:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Post by TT Liams
Krishna say's lie's cause he's really satin that's the father of
lie's!!!!!1
Satin? And you're a doctor? hahaha :) Talk about liar...
Look, God talks about you,
Bewildered by false ego, strength, pride, lust and anger, the demons
become envious of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is situated
in their own bodies and in the bodies of others, and blaspheme against
the real religion. (Bg. 16.18)
He's nothing but a potato head.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Jahnu
2018-06-22 04:33:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by duke
He's nothing but a potato head.
Krishna says:

Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My
transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord of all that be. (Bg. 9.11)

Those who are thus bewildered are attracted by demonic and atheistic
views. In that deluded condition, their hopes for liberation, their
fruitive activities, and their culture of knowledge are all defeated.
(Bg. 9.12)



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
duke
2018-06-22 17:17:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Post by duke
He's nothing but a potato head.
Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My
transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord of all that be. (Bg. 9.11)
Those who are thus bewildered are attracted by demonic and atheistic
views. In that deluded condition, their hopes for liberation, their
fruitive activities, and their culture of knowledge are all defeated.
(Bg. 9.12)
He's not God.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Jahnu
2018-06-23 00:28:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by duke
He's not God.
Because God hangs, half naked, suffering and bleeding, nailed to a
pole, right? hahaha :)

You wouldn't know God if he fell on your head.

"The religion and philosophy of the Hebrews are those of a wilder and
ruder tribe, wanting the civility and intellectual refinements and
subtlety of Vedic culture." - Henry David Thoreau


When you speak to people in general about God and religion, one
question that keeps coming up is - all religions are the same
nonsense, how do you know the God of your religion is better than any
other religion's God?

But it's a simple question to answer. First you read the Bible. Then
you read the Koran, and then you read Bhagavad Gita. These 3 books are
like the revealed scriptures of the world-religions, so they should
give you a pretty good answer.

When you have finished reading, you ponder the situation and ask
yourself - which of these books touch me the most profoundly, which of
them is closest to what you'd expect to hear from a God?

Can there be any doubt as to the answer?


Bhagavad Gita is the only book on the planet in which someone claiming
to be God, describes in detail about Himself, the soul and the world
and how they inter-relate. The philosophy and religion of Krishna’s
teachings is the pinnacle of philosophy and religion. The philosophy
delivered by Krishna in Bhagavad Gita is without a doubt the most
complete, consistent, sophisticated and well thought out explanation
of reality available anywhere in the world at all time.

Krishna says:

Self-complacent and always impudent, deluded by wealth and false
prestige, they sometimes proudly perform sacrifices in name only,
without following any rules or regulations. (Bg. 16.17)

Bewildered by false ego, strength, pride, lust and anger, the demons
become envious of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is situated
in their own bodies and in the bodies of others, and blaspheme against
the real religion. (Bg. 16.18)



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
Street
2018-06-23 06:33:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Krishna eats shit and so do I.
We know, Jesper, and we find it disgusting.
duke
2018-06-23 17:33:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Post by duke
He's not God.
Because God hangs, half naked, suffering and bleeding, nailed to a
pole, right? hahaha :)
Well, no. That was the man Jesus.
Post by Jahnu
You wouldn't know God if he fell on your head.
Look who has the problem.
Post by Jahnu
When you speak to people in general about God and religion, one
question that keeps coming up is - all religions are the same
nonsense, how do you know the God of your religion is better than any
other religion's God?
Almighty God is the only one.
Post by Jahnu
But it's a simple question to answer. First you read the Bible. Then
you read the Koran, and then you read Bhagavad Gita. These 3 books are
Post by duke
like the revealed scriptures of the world-religions, so they should
give you a pretty good answer.
Well, the koran was extracted from the prior bible some 600 years later. I'm
not sure about the BG.
Post by Jahnu
When you have finished reading, you ponder the situation and ask
yourself - which of these books touch me the most profoundly, which of
them is closest to what you'd expect to hear from a God?
If you don't know God, how can you decide?
Post by Jahnu
Can there be any doubt as to the answer?
No, it's God almighty.
Post by Jahnu
Bhagavad Gita is the only book on the planet in which someone claiming
to be God, describes in detail about Himself, the soul and the world
and how they inter-relate.
The OT came a couple of thousand years before the BG.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Atlatl Axolotl
2018-06-23 17:43:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by duke
Post by Jahnu
Post by duke
He's not God.
Because God hangs, half naked, suffering and bleeding, nailed to a
pole, right? hahaha :)
Well, no. That was the man Jesus.
Post by Jahnu
You wouldn't know God if he fell on your head.
Look who has the problem.
Post by Jahnu
When you speak to people in general about God and religion, one
question that keeps coming up is - all religions are the same
nonsense, how do you know the God of your religion is better than any
other religion's God?
Almighty God is the only one.
Post by Jahnu
But it's a simple question to answer. First you read the Bible. Then
you read the Koran, and then you read Bhagavad Gita. These 3 books are
Post by duke
like the revealed scriptures of the world-religions, so they should
give you a pretty good answer.
Well, the koran was extracted from the prior bible some 600 years later. I'm
not sure about the BG.
Post by Jahnu
When you have finished reading, you ponder the situation and ask
yourself - which of these books touch me the most profoundly, which of
them is closest to what you'd expect to hear from a God?
If you don't know God, how can you decide?
Post by Jahnu
Can there be any doubt as to the answer?
No, it's God almighty.
Post by Jahnu
Bhagavad Gita is the only book on the planet in which someone claiming
to be God, describes in detail about Himself, the soul and the world
and how they inter-relate.
//
Post by duke
The OT came a couple of thousand years before the BG.
What? No.

Jahnu is a loon, but you don't do your cause any good displaying that
kind of ignorance.

Books of the Old Testament: eighth century to first century BCE.

The Gita: fifth century to second century BCE.

Look it up for yourself.

Atlal
Post by duke
the dukester, American-American
*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
duke
2018-06-24 15:09:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 10:43:14 -0700 (PDT), Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by duke
Post by Jahnu
Post by duke
He's not God.
Because God hangs, half naked, suffering and bleeding, nailed to a
pole, right? hahaha :)
Well, no. That was the man Jesus.
Post by Jahnu
You wouldn't know God if he fell on your head.
Look who has the problem.
Post by Jahnu
When you speak to people in general about God and religion, one
question that keeps coming up is - all religions are the same
nonsense, how do you know the God of your religion is better than any
other religion's God?
Almighty God is the only one.
Post by Jahnu
But it's a simple question to answer. First you read the Bible. Then
you read the Koran, and then you read Bhagavad Gita. These 3 books are
Post by duke
like the revealed scriptures of the world-religions, so they should
give you a pretty good answer.
Well, the koran was extracted from the prior bible some 600 years later. I'm
not sure about the BG.
Post by Jahnu
When you have finished reading, you ponder the situation and ask
yourself - which of these books touch me the most profoundly, which of
them is closest to what you'd expect to hear from a God?
If you don't know God, how can you decide?
Post by Jahnu
Can there be any doubt as to the answer?
No, it's God almighty.
Post by Jahnu
Bhagavad Gita is the only book on the planet in which someone claiming
to be God, describes in detail about Himself, the soul and the world
and how they inter-relate.
The OT came a couple of thousand years before the BG.
What? No.
Yep.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Jahnu is a loon, but you don't do your cause any good displaying that
kind of ignorance.
I looked it up.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Books of the Old Testament: eighth century to first century BCE.
The Gita: fifth century to second century BCE.
Look it up for yourself.
I know. I said the OT came before the BG.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Atlatl Axolotl
2018-06-24 15:25:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by duke
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 10:43:14 -0700 (PDT), Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by duke
Post by Jahnu
Post by duke
He's not God.
Because God hangs, half naked, suffering and bleeding, nailed to a
pole, right? hahaha :)
Well, no. That was the man Jesus.
Post by Jahnu
You wouldn't know God if he fell on your head.
Look who has the problem.
Post by Jahnu
When you speak to people in general about God and religion, one
question that keeps coming up is - all religions are the same
nonsense, how do you know the God of your religion is better than any
other religion's God?
Almighty God is the only one.
Post by Jahnu
But it's a simple question to answer. First you read the Bible. Then
you read the Koran, and then you read Bhagavad Gita. These 3 books are
Post by duke
like the revealed scriptures of the world-religions, so they should
give you a pretty good answer.
Well, the koran was extracted from the prior bible some 600 years later. I'm
not sure about the BG.
Post by Jahnu
When you have finished reading, you ponder the situation and ask
yourself - which of these books touch me the most profoundly, which of
them is closest to what you'd expect to hear from a God?
If you don't know God, how can you decide?
Post by Jahnu
Can there be any doubt as to the answer?
No, it's God almighty.
Post by Jahnu
Bhagavad Gita is the only book on the planet in which someone claiming
to be God, describes in detail about Himself, the soul and the world
and how they inter-relate.
//
Post by duke
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by duke
The OT came a couple of thousand years before the BG.
What? No.
Yep.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Jahnu is a loon, but you don't do your cause any good displaying that
kind of ignorance.
I looked it up.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Books of the Old Testament: eighth century to first century BCE.
The Gita: fifth century to second century BCE.
Look it up for yourself.
I know. I said the OT came before the BG.
You said "a couple of thousand years before".

It did not.


AtlAxo
duke
2018-06-26 11:16:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 08:25:31 -0700 (PDT), Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by duke
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 10:43:14 -0700 (PDT), Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by duke
Post by Jahnu
Post by duke
He's not God.
Because God hangs, half naked, suffering and bleeding, nailed to a
pole, right? hahaha :)
Well, no. That was the man Jesus.
Post by Jahnu
You wouldn't know God if he fell on your head.
Look who has the problem.
Post by Jahnu
When you speak to people in general about God and religion, one
question that keeps coming up is - all religions are the same
nonsense, how do you know the God of your religion is better than any
other religion's God?
Almighty God is the only one.
Post by Jahnu
But it's a simple question to answer. First you read the Bible. Then
you read the Koran, and then you read Bhagavad Gita. These 3 books are
Post by duke
like the revealed scriptures of the world-religions, so they should
give you a pretty good answer.
Well, the koran was extracted from the prior bible some 600 years later. I'm
not sure about the BG.
Post by Jahnu
When you have finished reading, you ponder the situation and ask
yourself - which of these books touch me the most profoundly, which of
them is closest to what you'd expect to hear from a God?
If you don't know God, how can you decide?
Post by Jahnu
Can there be any doubt as to the answer?
No, it's God almighty.
Post by Jahnu
Bhagavad Gita is the only book on the planet in which someone claiming
to be God, describes in detail about Himself, the soul and the world
and how they inter-relate.
The OT came a couple of thousand years before the BG.
What? No.
Yep.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Jahnu is a loon, but you don't do your cause any good displaying that
kind of ignorance.
I looked it up.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Books of the Old Testament: eighth century to first century BCE.
The Gita: fifth century to second century BCE.
Look it up for yourself.
I know. I said the OT came before the BG.
You said "a couple of thousand years before".
It did not.
Theories on the date of composition of the Gita vary considerably. Scholars
accept dates from the fifth century to the second century BCE as the probable
range.

The OT relates back to 4000-1700BC. 500-200BC is well later.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
AtlAxo
the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Jahnu
2018-06-23 23:34:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by duke
Well, the koran was extracted from the prior bible some 600 years later. I'm
not sure about the BG.
The Koran and the Bible are low-class scriptures for low-class people.


"The religion and philosophy of the Hebrews are those of a wilder and
ruder tribe, wanting the civility and intellectual refinements and
subtlety of Vedic culture." - Henry David Thoreau

"In the whole world there is no study so beneficial and so elevating
as that of the Upanishads. It has been the solace of my life -- it
will be the solace of my death." -- Arthur Schopenhauer

"I owed a magnificent day to the Bhagavad Gita. It was as if an empire
spoke to us, nothing small or unworthy, but large, serene, consistent,
the voice of an old intelligence which in another age and climate had
pondered and thus disposed of the same questions which exercise us."
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson The famous poem "Brahm" is an example of his
Vedanta ecstasy.

"The most beautiful, perhaps the only true philosophical song existing
in any known tongue ... perhaps the deepest and loftiest thing the
world has to show." --Wilhelm von Humboldt

"The writers of the Indian philosophies will survive, when the British
dominion in India shall long have ceased to exist, and when the
sources which it yielded of wealth and power are lost to
remembrances." --Lord Warren Hastings


"So far as I am able to judge, nothing has been left undone, either by
man or nature, to make India the most extraordinary country that the
sun visits on his rounds. Nothing seems to have been forgotten,
nothing overlooked. Land of religions, cradle of human race,
birthplace of human speech, grandmother of legend, great grandmother
of tradition. The land that all men desire to see and having seen once
even by a glimpse, would not give that glimpse for the shows of the
rest of the globe combined." --Mark Twain

"Now it is not good for the Christian's health to hustle the Hindu
brown for the Christian riles and the Hindu smiles and weareth the
Christian down; and the end of the fight is a tombstone while with the
name of the late deceased and the epitaph drear, "A fool lies here who
tried to hustle the east". --Rudyard Kipling to Fundamental Christian
Missionaries



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
Street
2018-06-23 23:57:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Post by duke
Well, the koran was extracted from the prior bible some 600 years later. I'm
not sure about the BG.
The Koran and the Bible are low-class scriptures for low-class people.
You're much lower class than almost everybody else here, Jesper, including
Duke.
Jahnu
2018-06-25 09:49:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
You're much lower class than almost everybody else here, Jesper, including
Duke.
Thank you, Teddyboy. The minute a low-class dimwit like you, who feeds
on the carcasses of animals, consider me high-class, I know I'm in
deep shit.


One attains the human form of life after transmigrating through
8,400,000 species by the process of gradual evolution. That human life
is spoiled for those conceited fools who do not take shelter of the
lotus feet of Govinda.

--Brahma-vaivarta Purana


"There are 900,000 species of aquatic life; 2,000,000 species of
plants and trees; 1,100,000 species of insects; 1,000,000 species of
bird life; 3,000,000 species of beasts, and 400,000 species of human
life." (Padma Purana)



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
duke
2018-06-24 15:11:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Post by duke
Well, the koran was extracted from the prior bible some 600 years later. I'm
not sure about the BG.
The Koran and the Bible are low-class scriptures for low-class people.
What's low class about following God almighty. Who is you god?

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
TT Liams
2018-06-21 23:54:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Post by TT Liams
Krishna say's lie's cause he's really satin that's the father of
lie's!!!!!1
Satin? And you're a doctor? hahaha :) Talk about liar...
I got my diploma here & work as a scientist & your to dum to no what
I do lol
Jahnu
2018-09-13 00:34:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Science has proven the presence of Intelligent Design in nature.
After the electron-microscope was invented, it enabled scientists to
look into a living cell, and what they saw there was later dubbed as
'irreducible complexity.'

Irreducible complexity means a unit consisting of several working
parts whose functions are all inter-dependent.

Like a car engine - the cylinders only work in connection with the
pistons, the pistons only work in connection with the spark-plugs, and
the spark-plugs only work in connection with the electric system and
so on.

So a car engine only works as a complete unit, a unit that is
obviously designed by human intelligence. The idea that it has
designed itself and arose by gradual evolution, is simply too idiotic
to be even taken seriously.

Still, this is what evolutionists propose, and indeed, this ludicrous
idea is being taught in all the world's educational institutions as a
scientific fact.

Anyway, so a single living cell is like a car engine - an irreducible
complexity, which will only work when all it's parts work co-jointly
together.

To suggest that a cell created itself accidentally by gradual
evolution, is no less ridiculous than saying that a car-engine
assembled itself by gradual mutations over long spans of time.

"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are
great con-men, And the story they are telling may be the GREATEST HOAX
EVER." -- Dr.T.N.Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission

"We must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian
accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only
a variety of wishful speculations." -- Franklin Harold, Emeritus
Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Colorado State
University, in an Oxford University Press text.

"The probability that life arose by a coincidence can be likened to
the probability that a voluminous encyclopedia be the result of an
explosion in a print shop." -- Biologist Edwin Conklin

"From my earliest training as a scientist I was very strongly
brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind
of deliberate creation. That notion has had to be painfully shed. I am
quite uncomfortable in this situation, the state of mind I now find
myself in. But there is no logical way out of it. I now find myself
driven to this position by logic. There is no other way in which we
can understand the precise ordering of the chemicals of life except to
invoke the creations on a cosmic scale. . . We were hoping as
scientists that there would be a way round our conclusion, but there
isn't."
--Sir Frederick Hoyle and Chandra Wickramsinghe, There Must Be A God,
Daily Express, Aug. 14, 1981. & Hoyle On Evolution. Nature, Nov. 12,
1981, 105

"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a
superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry
and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about
in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so
overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question." - Fred
Hoyle, astrophysicist

"I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not
acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the
existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who
would deny the advances of science." - Wernher von Braun




https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM

Jahnu
2018-06-14 11:34:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:36:28 -0400, TT Liams
You just can't tell cause mah brearth smell's like mah momma's twat.
Ah is an inbread bastard and Ah loves it.
http://reluctant-messenger.com/reincarnation-proof.htm

http://shiftfrequency.com/scientific-proof-of-reincarnation-dr-ian-stevensons-life-work/

"The religion and philosophy of the Hebrews are those of a wilder and
ruder tribe, wanting the civility and intellectual refinements and
subtlety of Vedic culture." - Henry David Thoreau





https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
Cloud Hobbit
2018-06-12 05:35:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Don't hold your breath. The last thing an atheist >wants is the truth.
As a die-hard atheist one has to dedicate oneself to >untruth and
reject all logic, reason, common sense and empiric >observations.
You are confusing atheists with theists. No surprise really since you usually get things wrong or just outright lie.

It is precisely because atheists are determined to use reason and empirical evidence that they are atheists in the first place.

Seriously, how can anyone with a fully functioning brain believe that some God is or has ever done any of the nonsense attributed to them?

Try looking at any religion you are unfamiliar with and see how nonsensical they seem. That's the problem with all of them.

They all claim to be the one true religion and pray to the true God(s).

One of them can prove their God or gods actually exist.

They all lie.
b***@m.nu
2018-06-12 08:10:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 22:35:44 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Don't hold your breath. The last thing an atheist >wants is the truth.
As a die-hard atheist one has to dedicate oneself to >untruth and
reject all logic, reason, common sense and empiric >observations.
You are confusing atheists with theists. No surprise really since you usually get things wrong or just outright lie.
I find that statement it made concerning your reply so funny that a
theist could actually believe in real live fairies and then say
something like that as though it may actually mean something
Post by Cloud Hobbit
It is precisely because atheists are determined to use reason and empirical evidence that they are atheists in the first place.
Seriously, how can anyone with a fully functioning brain believe that some God is or has ever done any of the nonsense attributed to them?
Try looking at any religion you are unfamiliar with and see how nonsensical they seem. That's the problem with all of them.
They all claim to be the one true religion and pray to the true God(s).
poor janet is so confused, his pagan religion has thousands of gods.
That must get very confusing
Post by Cloud Hobbit
One of them can prove their God or gods actually exist.
They all lie.
duke
2018-06-17 14:30:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 22:35:44 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Don't hold your breath. The last thing an atheist >wants is the truth.
As a die-hard atheist one has to dedicate oneself to >untruth and
reject all logic, reason, common sense and empiric >observations.
You are confusing atheists with theists. No surprise really since you usually get things wrong or just outright lie.
It is precisely because atheists are determined to use reason and empirical evidence that they are atheists in the first place.
Well, please kindly reveal this reason and empirical evidence that I've asked
for since Moses parted the Red Sea. For some strange reason, you people suggest
it but never, ever print it.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Seriously, how can anyone with a fully functioning brain believe that some God is or has ever done any of the nonsense attributed to them?
See, typically nothing.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Try looking at any religion you are unfamiliar with and see how nonsensical they seem. That's the problem with all of them.
Seem??? For one that refuses to ever consider the existence of God.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
They all claim to be the one true religion and pray to the true God(s).
One of them can prove their God or gods actually exist.
They all lie.
Waiting on you.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
2018-06-15 09:25:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
Science has proven the presence of Intelligent Design in nature.
No.
Jahnu
2018-06-17 00:55:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:25:43 -0700 (PDT), "hypatiab7(hypatiab7)"
No.
The only ones who think evolution and abiogenesis has anything to do
with science are the mindless masses. You obviously belong to the
unthinking, indooctrinated general population :D

Actual scientists know better.

"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are
great con-men, And the story they are telling may be the GREATEST HOAX
EVER." -- Dr.T.N.Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission

"We must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian
accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only
a variety of wishful speculations." -- Franklin Harold, Emeritus
Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Colorado State
University, in an Oxford University Press text.

"Darwinian evolution - whatever its other virtues - does not provide a
fruitful heuristic in experimental biology. This becomes especially
clear when we compare it with a heuristic framework such as the atomic
model, which opens up structural chemistry and leads to advances in
the synthesis of a multitude of new molecules of practical benefit.
None of this demonstrates that Darwinism is false. It does, however,
mean that the claim that it is the cornerstone of modern experimental
biology will be met with quiet skepticism from a growing number of
scientists in fields where theories actually do serve as cornerstones
for tangible breakthroughs." --U.S. National Academy of Sciences
member Philip Skell

"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major
transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our
imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has
been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of
evolution." --Late American paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould

"The probability that life arose by a coincidence can be likened to
the probability that a voluminous encyclopedia be the result of an
explosion in a print shop." - Biologist Edwin Conklin

"From my earliest training as a scientist I was very strongly
brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind
of deliberate creation. That notion has had to be painfully shed. I am
quite uncomfortable in this situation, the state of mind I now find
myself in. But there is no logical way out of it. I now find myself
driven to this position by logic. There is no other way in which we
can understand the precise ordering of the chemicals of life except to
invoke the creations on a cosmic scale. . . We were hoping as
scientists that there would be a way round our conclusion, but there
isn’t."

--Sir Frederick Hoyle and Chandra Wickramsinghe, There Must Be A God,
Daily Express, Aug. 14, 1981. & Hoyle On Evolution. Nature, Nov. 12,
1981, 105

The hypothesis that life evolved from inorganic matter is still to
this day a matter of belief. - Matematician J. W. N. Sullivan

"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a
superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry
and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about
in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so
overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question." - Fred
Hoyle, astrophysicist

"I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not
acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the
existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who
would deny the advances of science." - Wernher von Braun

"The gift of mental power comes from God, Divine Being, and if we
concetrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this great
power." - Nikola Tesla

"The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only
proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful
Being." - Isaac Newton



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
Street
2018-06-18 01:33:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jahnu
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:25:43 -0700 (PDT), "hypatiab7(hypatiab7)"
No.
The only ones who think evolution and abiogenesis has anything to do
with science are the mindless masses. You obviously belong to the
unthinking, indooctrinated general population :D
Actual scientists know better.
Lying idiot.
Jahnu
2018-06-18 04:21:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Street
Post by Jahnu
The only ones who think evolution and abiogenesis has anything to do
with science are the mindless masses. You obviously belong to the
unthinking, indooctrinated general population :D
Actual scientists know better.
Lying idiot.
hahaha :) You wish, Teddyboy, poor indoctrinated sucker. How's it
feel to be one of the broad, deluded masses, incapable of independent
thinking?

"Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes
convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe - a
spirit vastly superior to that of man...In this way the pursuit of
science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is
indeed quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive."

[Letter to a child who asked if scientist pray, January 24, 1936; pg.
152 Calaprice]



https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
Jahnu
2018-06-20 09:26:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by TT Liams
I got a doctor degree, rumdum!!
hahaha :) You are a shameless liar.

Look, God talks about you in the Bhagavad Gita.


Krishna says:

Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My
transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord of all that be. (Bg. 9.11)

Those who are thus bewildered are attracted by demonic and atheistic
views. In that deluded condition, their hopes for liberation, their
fruitive activities, and their culture of knowledge are all defeated.
(Bg. 9.12)





https://www.youtube.com/user/jahnudvip?feature=watch

https://picasaweb.google.com/113672947796865733014/Jahnu

http://www.touchtalent.com//artist/118705/jahnu-das

http://youtu.be/B46rjU_q_cM
Loading...