Post by Andrew Post by John Locke Post by Andrew Post by Atlatl Axolotl Post by John Locke
... faith means ignoring reality and living in a fantasy world.
.> Yet that is exactly what you are doing, because you believe the
.> "goo to you" story and that the Universe created itself..contrary
.> to the laws of science. Stories that were fantasized by god-less
Which specific "godless cosmologists" might you be referring to?
Specifically those who ignore the clear evidence that we are the
result being created by a most awesome and wonderful Creator,
,> > ..if you've got this "evidence" for a creator, then why haven't you
,> > submitted your "evidence" to a scientific journal editor for peer
,> > review ?
,> Here is further evidence of your deception, to think
,> that they would be devoid of any professional bias.
Andrew really doesn't want to discuss the implications of the
simple fact that the biological and physical sciences are
full of Christians. I've known many myself.
Post by Andrew Post by John Locke
...I suspect it's because you really don't have any
evidence that would stand up to any real scientific
You need to think for yourself, rather then just
follow what others say, like you propose to do
And John! While you are here, why is it that you
always run off whenever I ask you this question?
"Explain what is the "naturalistic only" origin of
*biological information* apart from a creation."
.> Since you can not explain it, it remains as irrefutable
.> evidence for Creation, and that atheists are deceived.
John "runs off" whenever you bring that up?
Sort of like you run off whenever I point out that
we can not explain how lightning initially discharges,
therefore this must be "irrefutable evidence" for
Thor, son of Odin AllFather?