Discussion:
Director Posits Proof of Exodus
(too old to reply)
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-08 23:20:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
Yap Honghor
2018-04-08 23:39:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
Are you joking....an art director proves?????
John Baker
2018-04-09 09:00:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:39:52 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
Are you joking....an art director proves?????
No, he's not joking. He really is that stupid.






AA #1898
Giver of No Fucks
Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-09 13:39:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by John Baker
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:39:52 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
Are you joking....an art director proves?????
No, he's not joking. He really is that stupid.
He's not an arts director. He's a filmmaker, idiot.
Post by John Baker
AA #1898
Giver of No Fucks
Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch
Yap Honghor
2018-04-09 23:47:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by John Baker
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:39:52 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
Are you joking....an art director proves?????
No, he's not joking. He really is that stupid.
He's not an arts director. He's a filmmaker, idiot.
A film director is an art director, Mad Joe.
b***@m.nu
2018-04-09 13:26:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:39:52 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
Are you joking....an art director proves?????
If it thinks that the exodus actually happened then it believes that
the lord of the rings is a true story also
Mitchell Holman
2018-04-09 02:07:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-
exodus/article1098090/
"Mr. Jacobovici contends that volcanology
and geology can explain not only the first
plague - that Egypt's waters were turned
blood-red through the release of toxic gas,
similar to what happened at Lake Nios in
Cameroon in 1986; but they also can explain
the succeeding nine plagues - frogs, fleas,
flies, livestock deaths, boils, hailstorms,
locusts, darkness and the death of the
Egyptian firstborn males."


Gads..............
Meteorite Debris
2018-04-09 02:24:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-
exodus/article1098090/
"Mr. Jacobovici contends that volcanology
and geology can explain not only the first
plague - that Egypt's waters were turned
blood-red through the release of toxic gas,
similar to what happened at Lake Nios in
Cameroon in 1986; but they also can explain
the succeeding nine plagues - frogs, fleas,
flies, livestock deaths, boils, hailstorms,
locusts, darkness and the death of the
Egyptian firstborn males."
Gads..............
Except the Hebrews were never in Egypt. Rather the Egyptian Empire at
its peak included Canaan. So Really Egypt left Canaan and not the other
way around. The whole Exodus episode is a retelling of the story of
Sargon of Akkad, just as the Noah flood is a retelling of the Epic of
Gilgamesh. The Israelites were Canaanites. The cities of Ai and Jericho
had been ruins for hundreds of years and the walls falling down may have
been earthquakes. Not knowing where the ruins came from the ancient
Israelites invented an invasion narrative in about the 6th century BCE,
placing the events nearly 1,000 earlier. Many of their ideas, including
religious concepts, had come from outside, why not themselves and that
makes a good origins story.
Mitchell Holman
2018-04-09 02:41:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Meteorite Debris
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblic
al- exodus/article1098090/
"Mr. Jacobovici contends that volcanology
and geology can explain not only the first
plague - that Egypt's waters were turned
blood-red through the release of toxic gas,
similar to what happened at Lake Nios in
Cameroon in 1986; but they also can explain
the succeeding nine plagues - frogs, fleas,
flies, livestock deaths, boils, hailstorms,
locusts, darkness and the death of the
Egyptian firstborn males."
Gads..............
Except the Hebrews were never in Egypt. Rather the Egyptian Empire at
its peak included Canaan. So Really Egypt left Canaan and not the
other way around. The whole Exodus episode is a retelling of the story
of Sargon of Akkad, just as the Noah flood is a retelling of the Epic
of Gilgamesh. The Israelites were Canaanites. The cities of Ai and
Jericho had been ruins for hundreds of years and the walls falling
down may have been earthquakes. Not knowing where the ruins came from
the ancient Israelites invented an invasion narrative in about the 6th
century BCE, placing the events nearly 1,000 earlier. Many of their
ideas, including religious concepts, had come from outside, why not
themselves and that makes a good origins story.
I want to hear how ANY natural disaster
can kill only the first born males........
hypatiab7
2018-04-09 21:02:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Meteorite Debris
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblic
al- exodus/article1098090/
"Mr. Jacobovici contends that volcanology
and geology can explain not only the first
plague - that Egypt's waters were turned
blood-red through the release of toxic gas,
similar to what happened at Lake Nios in
Cameroon in 1986; but they also can explain
the succeeding nine plagues - frogs, fleas,
flies, livestock deaths, boils, hailstorms,
locusts, darkness and the death of the
Egyptian firstborn males."
Gads..............
Except the Hebrews were never in Egypt. Rather the Egyptian Empire at
its peak included Canaan. So Really Egypt left Canaan and not the
other way around. The whole Exodus episode is a retelling of the story
of Sargon of Akkad, just as the Noah flood is a retelling of the Epic
of Gilgamesh. The Israelites were Canaanites. The cities of Ai and
Jericho had been ruins for hundreds of years and the walls falling
down may have been earthquakes. Not knowing where the ruins came from
the ancient Israelites invented an invasion narrative in about the 6th
century BCE, placing the events nearly 1,000 earlier. Many of their
ideas, including religious concepts, had come from outside, why not
themselves and that makes a good origins story.
I want to hear how ANY natural disaster
can kill only the first born males........
The first born were fed first from the top of the grain containers. The
top grain was easily infested with bacteria that killed the unlucky first
born. This probably happened more than once and was a prime idea to be
added to the plague story. The bacteria, of course, couldn't be seen. So,
they didn't know what was killing off anyone. It probably killed off more
than the first born, but they weren't important enough to be mentioned.
Also, killing off the first born would have wiped out a good part of their
army officers and soldiers and politicians in Egypt. Would they have been
able to organize an army to chase the escaping Hebrews? Why doesn't anyone
think of such things?
Don Martin
2018-04-09 22:31:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:41:30 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
I want to hear how ANY natural disaster
can kill only the first born males........
In Biblical times, all natural disasters, being created directly by
jaweh, were exquisitely sensitive: this one could detect the oldest
bris in any goup of siblings with 99.967% accuracy. (Can I get an
"amen?")
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Smiler
2018-04-10 00:01:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:41:30 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
I want to hear how ANY natural disaster
can kill only the first born males........
In Biblical times, all natural disasters, being created directly by
jaweh, were exquisitely sensitive: this one could detect the oldest
bris in any goup of siblings with 99.967% accuracy. (Can I get an
"amen?")
The other 0.033% were 'collateral damage'.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Don Martin
2018-04-10 02:27:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:41:30 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
I want to hear how ANY natural disaster
can kill only the first born males........
In Biblical times, all natural disasters, being created directly by
jaweh, were exquisitely sensitive: this one could detect the oldest
bris in any goup of siblings with 99.967% accuracy. (Can I get an
"amen?")
The other 0.033% were 'collateral damage'.
We call it "friendly fire," but it doesn't seem terribly friendly to
me.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
hypatiab7
2018-04-10 02:45:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:41:30 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
I want to hear how ANY natural disaster
can kill only the first born males........
In Biblical times, all natural disasters, being created directly by
jaweh, were exquisitely sensitive: this one could detect the oldest
bris in any goup of siblings with 99.967% accuracy. (Can I get an
"amen?")
Did your response to this message switch you over to soc.culture.jewish?
This has happened to me a few times when responding to ArtieJoe. I also
noticed that the dating/sex thread we've been receiving is also showing
up in the Jewish newsgroup. ArtieJoe Tandy strikes again. First a Nazi
thread, now a sex thread. Artie Joe seriously needs psychological help.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 02:55:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:41:30 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
I want to hear how ANY natural disaster
can kill only the first born males........
In Biblical times, all natural disasters, being created directly by
jaweh, were exquisitely sensitive: this one could detect the oldest
bris in any goup of siblings with 99.967% accuracy. (Can I get an
"amen?")
Did your response to this message switch you over to soc.culture.jewish?
This has happened to me a few times when responding to ArtieJoe. I also
noticed that the dating/sex thread we've been receiving is also showing
up in the Jewish newsgroup. ArtieJoe Tandy strikes again. First a Nazi
thread, now a sex thread. Artie Joe seriously needs psychological help.
Just look at6 his brain x-ray.


Here's his home page.
https://piv.pivpiv.dk/
Smiler
2018-04-11 01:36:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:41:30 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
I want to hear how ANY natural disaster
can kill only the first born males........
In Biblical times, all natural disasters, being created directly by
jaweh, were exquisitely sensitive: this one could detect the oldest
bris in any goup of siblings with 99.967% accuracy. (Can I get an
"amen?")
Did your response to this message switch you over to
soc.culture.jewish?
This has happened to me a few times when responding to ArtieJoe. I also
noticed that the dating/sex thread we've been receiving is also showing
up in the Jewish newsgroup. ArtieJoe Tandy strikes again. First a Nazi
thread, now a sex thread. Artie Joe seriously needs psychological help.
Just look at6 his brain x-ray.
http://youtu.be/slpUgjjpkBY
Not even an 'Intel inside'.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Here's his home page.
https://piv.pivpiv.dk/
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Don Martin
2018-04-10 21:38:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 19:45:07 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:41:30 -0500, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
I want to hear how ANY natural disaster
can kill only the first born males........
In Biblical times, all natural disasters, being created directly by
jaweh, were exquisitely sensitive: this one could detect the oldest
bris in any goup of siblings with 99.967% accuracy. (Can I get an
"amen?")
Did your response to this message switch you over to soc.culture.jewish?
This has happened to me a few times when responding to ArtieJoe. I also
noticed that the dating/sex thread we've been receiving is also showing
up in the Jewish newsgroup. ArtieJoe Tandy strikes again. First a Nazi
thread, now a sex thread. Artie Joe seriously needs psychological help.
Or confinement to a leprosarium: hands without fingers trouble no
keyboards.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
hypatiab7
2018-04-09 20:43:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-
exodus/article1098090/
"Mr. Jacobovici contends that volcanology
and geology can explain not only the first
plague - that Egypt's waters were turned
blood-red through the release of toxic gas,
similar to what happened at Lake Nios in
Cameroon in 1986; but they also can explain
the succeeding nine plagues - frogs, fleas,
flies, livestock deaths, boils, hailstorms,
locusts, darkness and the death of the
Egyptian firstborn males."
Gads..............
Ye gads!
D***@teikyopost.edu
2018-04-09 02:22:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
Simcha Jacobovici is a co-author of of the fanciful book

https://www.amazon.com/Lost-Gospel-Decoding-Marriage-Magdalene/dp/1605986100/

and is featured prominently in the ridiculous PBS program
"Last Days of Jesus."

http://www.pbs.org/program/last-days-jesus/

The gist of the program is that Jesus was involved in a power play
involving Herod Antipas and Lucius Aelius Sejanus. The objective was
to make Herod Antipas "King of the Jews" and to give Jesus control
of the Jerusalem Temple--a scheme that collapsed with the downfall
of Sejanus. What a Joke!
sheesh ranjeesh
2018-04-09 04:30:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
http://theheards.us/chris/?page_id=141

http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2006/09/debunking-the-exodus-decoded.aspx#Article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus_Decoded#Credibility

SR
John Locke
2018-04-09 15:24:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
<
.. manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-09 16:56:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________

Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.

He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.

Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
sheesh ranjeesh
2018-04-09 17:21:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.


SR
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-09 18:15:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.

______________


It's an ongoing issue with him.
When I first read that the consensus was that the Exodus was fiction I posted that this was the case and Art lost his shit.

I could have understood if there were any basis in history for the myth and it just got blown out of proportion as are so many things in OT. But there isn't.

None of the people claiming it is a fact seem to want to deal with the fact that absolutely nothing about the story is even plausible and that no evidence of a reliable kind has been found which is also impossible.

They seem to think there is a conspiracy by scientists to hide the "real" truth just as they claim happened with evolution, ignoring the idea that if any evidence of the Exodus had been found and was judged to be reliable, that the person who found it would be an instant superstar. The same holds true for Evolution. If anybody could prove it false that person or persons would also be instantly famous and would go down in history.

How can these people be so blind to reality?
%
2018-04-09 18:25:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
______________
It's an ongoing issue with him.
When I first read that the consensus was that the Exodus was fiction I posted that this was the case and Art lost his shit.
I could have understood if there were any basis in history for the myth and it just got blown out of proportion as are so many things in OT. But there isn't.
None of the people claiming it is a fact seem to want to deal with the fact that absolutely nothing about the story is even plausible and that no evidence of a reliable kind has been found which is also impossible.
They seem to think there is a conspiracy by scientists to hide the "real" truth just as they claim happened with evolution, ignoring the idea that if any evidence of the Exodus had been found and was judged to be reliable, that the person who found it would be an instant superstar. The same holds true for Evolution. If anybody could prove it false that person or persons would also be instantly famous and would go down in history.
How can these people be so blind to reality?
who's reality , yours , what makes yours so right
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-09 18:57:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by %
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
______________
It's an ongoing issue with him.
When I first read that the consensus was that the Exodus was fiction I posted that this was the case and Art lost his shit.
I could have understood if there were any basis in history for the myth and it just got blown out of proportion as are so many things in OT. But there isn't.
None of the people claiming it is a fact seem to want to deal with the fact that absolutely nothing about the story is even plausible and that no evidence of a reliable kind has been found which is also impossible.
They seem to think there is a conspiracy by scientists to hide the "real" truth just as they claim happened with evolution, ignoring the idea that if any evidence of the Exodus had been found and was judged to be reliable, that the person who found it would be an instant superstar. The same holds true for Evolution. If anybody could prove it false that person or persons would also be instantly famous and would go down in history.
How can these people be so blind to reality?
who's reality , yours , what makes yours so right
If you find anybody who believes anything Hobbit says, let me know;I want to sell them the Brooklyn Bridge.HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-09 18:55:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
______________
It's an ongoing issue with him.
When I first read that the consensus was that the Exodus was fiction I posted that this was the case and Art lost his shit.
I could have understood if there were any basis in history for the myth and it just got blown out of proportion as are so many things in OT. But there isn't.
None of the people claiming it is a fact seem to want to deal with the fact that absolutely nothing about the story is even plausible and that no evidence of a reliable kind has been found which is also impossible.
They seem to think there is a conspiracy by scientists to hide the "real" truth just as they claim happened with evolution, ignoring the idea that if any evidence of the Exodus had been found and was judged to be reliable, that the person who found it would be an instant superstar. The same holds true for Evolution. If anybody could prove it false that person or persons would also be instantly famous and would go down in history.
How can these people be so blind to reality?
I don't believe a word you say.I suspect I'm not alone in that opinion.
b***@m.nu
2018-04-09 20:22:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:15:05 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
______________
It's an ongoing issue with him.
When I first read that the consensus was that the Exodus was fiction I posted that this was the case and Art lost his shit.
I could have understood if there were any basis in history for the myth and it just got blown out of proportion as are so many things in OT. But there isn't.
None of the people claiming it is a fact seem to want to deal with the fact that absolutely nothing about the story is even plausible and that no evidence of a reliable kind has been found which is also impossible.
They seem to think there is a conspiracy by scientists to hide the "real" truth just as they claim happened with evolution, ignoring the idea that if any evidence of the Exodus had been found and was judged to be reliable, that the person who found it would be an instant superstar. The same holds true for Evolution. If anybody could prove it false that person or persons would also be instantly famous and would go down in history.
How can these people be so blind to reality?
I personally think that he has started his period. I hope he has
stocked up on tampons cause this looks like a big one.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-09 18:54:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
SR
So much for your "consensus" that the exodus didn't happen. HAHAHAHAHA!
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-09 20:05:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.

You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-09 20:43:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-09 21:07:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
___________

Evasion noted.
hypatiab7
2018-04-09 21:12:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Wow! You must have been just sitting there waiting for responses. Too bad
for you that no one agreed with you.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-09 21:19:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Wow! You must have been just sitting there waiting for responses. Too bad
for you that no one agreed with you.
You atheist idiots don't matter.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-09 23:46:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
You atheist idiots don't matter.
_____________

If that were true you wouldn't be clamouring for our attention so often.

You just can't tell the truth.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-10 01:17:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
You atheist idiots don't matter.
_____________
If that were true you wouldn't be clamouring for our attention so often.
You just can't tell the truth.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 02:25:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz


Another if Madjoe's evasions.

We win again.
Mitchell Holman
2018-04-10 01:48:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Wow! You must have been just sitting there waiting for responses. Too
bad for you that no one agreed with you.
You atheist idiots don't matter.
Just back your claim from your cite that
natural disasters caused the death of all the
first born males.

You DID read your article before posting
it, no?



"Mr. Jacobovici contends that volcanology
and geology can explain not only the first
plague - that Egypt's waters were turned
blood-red through the release of toxic gas,
similar to what happened at Lake Nios in
Cameroon in 1986; but they also can explain
the succeeding nine plagues - frogs, fleas,
flies, livestock deaths, boils, hailstorms,
locusts, darkness and the death of the
Egyptian firstborn males."
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-10 09:02:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Wow! You must have been just sitting there waiting for responses. Too
bad for you that no one agreed with you.
You atheist idiots don't matter.
Just back your claim from your cite that
natural disasters caused the death of all the
first born males.
You DID read your article before posting
it, no?
"Mr. Jacobovici contends that volcanology
and geology can explain not only the first
plague - that Egypt's waters were turned
blood-red through the release of toxic gas,
similar to what happened at Lake Nios in
Cameroon in 1986; but they also can explain
the succeeding nine plagues - frogs, fleas,
flies, livestock deaths, boils, hailstorms,
locusts, darkness and the death of the
Egyptian firstborn males."
I never said that.
Mitchell Holman
2018-04-10 12:38:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Wow! You must have been just sitting there waiting for responses. Too
bad for you that no one agreed with you.
You atheist idiots don't matter.
Just back your claim from your cite that
natural disasters caused the death of all the
first born males.
You DID read your article before posting
it, no?
"Mr. Jacobovici contends that volcanology
and geology can explain not only the first
plague - that Egypt's waters were turned
blood-red through the release of toxic gas,
similar to what happened at Lake Nios in
Cameroon in 1986; but they also can explain
the succeeding nine plagues - frogs, fleas,
flies, livestock deaths, boils, hailstorms,
locusts, darkness and the death of the
Egyptian firstborn males."
I never said that.
And you never read it before posting it
as "proof" either.

Tell us - do you actually read ANY of
the articles that you post here?
hypatiab7
2018-04-10 02:22:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Wow! You must have been just sitting there waiting for responses. Too bad
for you that no one agreed with you.
You atheist idiots don't matter.
Sure we do, or you wouldn't respond. You keep trying to ignore that.
hypatiab7
2018-04-09 21:13:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Nervous sweaty laughter, just like Earl.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-10 01:18:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 02:26:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
_______________

Art tries to evade one again.
Once again he is shown to be a moron.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 02:47:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
_______________
Art tries to evade one again.
Once again he is shown to be a moron.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Hobbit Lies



NUMBER 1

me (Joe Bruno change)


Aug 17
Post by v***@gmail.com
Not really a big deal since Moses did not exist, so they started from a false premise.
That'S A LIe

No, it is not a lie. It is the scientific consensus.
Post by v***@gmail.com
It's not like anybody here gives a fuck what YOU say. We have decided you have no pride and no integrity and you can't possibly be a Christian or you would not lie constantly.
HAHAHAHA! I'm NOT a Christian.I'm a Jew, you illiterate babbling jackass


That's not a lie it's just that at that time you were on one of your defend the Christian modes and it makes hard to know what the fuck you are aside from an asshole.

Cloud Hobbit

I know about him as well, I just forgot, it happens, get over it.
I think my record for accuracy far out distances him or you or any other creationist idiot.


BRUNO NOT A CREATIONIST
Post by v***@gmail.com
me (Joe Bruno change)
Apr 11
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
http://youtu.be/lbq1TqJyExM
The traditional dichotomy has Creationists on one side and supporters of Evolution on the other. They might need a 3rd category for me.
I'm not a Creationist, but I have some doubts about evolution. "
This is the 3rd time I have proven you a LIAR on this same issue.
Still not a lie.
They already have a category for you, Doofus Aurelius.

Next you say:
That's a lie. I have said repeatedly I am not a creationist, nor do I advocate
the truth of intelligent design.I do not accept any of the 3 theories as
credible and probable.


Which means you are a moron and might as well be a creationist because you're stupid.

Then there's this:
I have problems with evolution and I am not a creationist at all.Ben Carson, the famous neurosurgeon, does not base his objections on the bible, either. He says, after years of treating medical patients and performing surgery on them, that evolution simply does not
jive with what he has seen. My family doctor years ago said the same thing.


What sort of Jew would want to reference a religious moron like Ben Carson?
He certainly isn't basing his comments on science.

Then there's this lie of yours
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
"When it comes to Moses, again, you have a really larger-than-life
portrait,"
"...the 'larger than life' portraits of the Bible are unrealistic and
contradicted by the archaeological evidence." Dever, William G.
(March-April 2006). "The Western Cultural Tradition Is at Risk".
Biblical Archaeology Review 32 (2): 26 & 76.
said William Dever, a professor of archaeology from Lycoming
College. "I doubt that the miracles attributed to him ever took
place. I don't think he led three million Israelites out of Egypt
in an exodus across the Sinai. I don't think he was the founder
of Israelite religion, but
I think there was a Moses. I argue, and I think some other
archaeologists will, too, there was a small exodus group --
not millions of people, but perhaps a few thousand -- who
did escape from slavery in Egypt."
In spite of the total lack of evidence.
Just making sure yoou are aware that the bit about there being a Moses is NOT Dever speaking. It was idiot Bruno trying to make it look as if Dever said it.
And as I poiinted out to you at the time, if the quotes attributed to him were true when he said them for the TV program, they were not what he believes any more and provided you with more recent quotes to prove it. you still contiinued to lie about it.
%
2018-04-10 02:49:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
_______________
Art tries to evade one again.
Once again he is shown to be a moron.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Hobbit Lies
NUMBER 1
me (Joe Bruno change)
Aug 17
Post by v***@gmail.com
Not really a big deal since Moses did not exist, so they started from a false premise.
That'S A LIe
No, it is not a lie. It is the scientific consensus.
Post by v***@gmail.com
It's not like anybody here gives a fuck what YOU say. We have decided you have no pride and no integrity and you can't possibly be a Christian or you would not lie constantly.
HAHAHAHA! I'm NOT a Christian.I'm a Jew, you illiterate babbling jackass
That's not a lie it's just that at that time you were on one of your defend the Christian modes and it makes hard to know what the fuck you are aside from an asshole.
Cloud Hobbit
I know about him as well, I just forgot, it happens, get over it.
I think my record for accuracy far out distances him or you or any other creationist idiot.
BRUNO NOT A CREATIONIST
Post by v***@gmail.com
me (Joe Bruno change)
Apr 11
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
http://youtu.be/lbq1TqJyExM
The traditional dichotomy has Creationists on one side and supporters of Evolution on the other. They might need a 3rd category for me.
I'm not a Creationist, but I have some doubts about evolution. "
This is the 3rd time I have proven you a LIAR on this same issue.
Still not a lie.
They already have a category for you, Doofus Aurelius.
That's a lie. I have said repeatedly I am not a creationist, nor do I advocate
the truth of intelligent design.I do not accept any of the 3 theories as
credible and probable.
Which means you are a moron and might as well be a creationist because you're stupid.
I have problems with evolution and I am not a creationist at all.Ben Carson, the famous neurosurgeon, does not base his objections on the bible, either. He says, after years of treating medical patients and performing surgery on them, that evolution simply does not
jive with what he has seen. My family doctor years ago said the same thing.
What sort of Jew would want to reference a religious moron like Ben Carson?
He certainly isn't basing his comments on science.
Then there's this lie of yours
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
"When it comes to Moses, again, you have a really larger-than-life
portrait,"
"...the 'larger than life' portraits of the Bible are unrealistic and
contradicted by the archaeological evidence." Dever, William G.
(March-April 2006). "The Western Cultural Tradition Is at Risk".
Biblical Archaeology Review 32 (2): 26 & 76.
said William Dever, a professor of archaeology from Lycoming
College. "I doubt that the miracles attributed to him ever took
place. I don't think he led three million Israelites out of Egypt
in an exodus across the Sinai. I don't think he was the founder
of Israelite religion, but
I think there was a Moses. I argue, and I think some other
archaeologists will, too, there was a small exodus group --
not millions of people, but perhaps a few thousand -- who
did escape from slavery in Egypt."
In spite of the total lack of evidence.
Just making sure yoou are aware that the bit about there being a Moses is NOT Dever speaking. It was idiot Bruno trying to make it look as if Dever said it.
And as I poiinted out to you at the time, if the quotes attributed to him were true when he said them for the TV program, they were not what he believes any more and provided you with more recent quotes to prove it. you still contiinued to lie about it.
so
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 02:46:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Hobbit Lies



NUMBER 1

me (Joe Bruno change)


Aug 17
Post by v***@gmail.com
Not really a big deal since Moses did not exist, so they started from a false premise.
That'S A LIe

No, it is not a lie. It is the scientific consensus.
Post by v***@gmail.com
It's not like anybody here gives a fuck what YOU say. We have decided you have no pride and no integrity and you can't possibly be a Christian or you would not lie constantly.
HAHAHAHA! I'm NOT a Christian.I'm a Jew, you illiterate babbling jackass


That's not a lie it's just that at that time you were on one of your defend the Christian modes and it makes hard to know what the fuck you are aside from an asshole.

Cloud Hobbit

I know about him as well, I just forgot, it happens, get over it.
I think my record for accuracy far out distances him or you or any other creationist idiot.


BRUNO NOT A CREATIONIST
Post by v***@gmail.com
me (Joe Bruno change)
Apr 11
Post by Cloud Hobbit
http://youtu.be/lbq1TqJyExM
The traditional dichotomy has Creationists on one side and supporters of Evolution on the other. They might need a 3rd category for me.
I'm not a Creationist, but I have some doubts about evolution. "
This is the 3rd time I have proven you a LIAR on this same issue.
Still not a lie.
They already have a category for you, Doofus Aurelius.

Next you say:
That's a lie. I have said repeatedly I am not a creationist, nor do I advocate
the truth of intelligent design.I do not accept any of the 3 theories as
credible and probable.


Which means you are a moron and might as well be a creationist because you're stupid.

Then there's this:
I have problems with evolution and I am not a creationist at all.Ben Carson, the famous neurosurgeon, does not base his objections on the bible, either. He says, after years of treating medical patients and performing surgery on them, that evolution simply does not
jive with what he has seen. My family doctor years ago said the same thing.


What sort of Jew would want to reference a religious moron like Ben Carson?
He certainly isn't basing his comments on science.

Then there's this lie of yours
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
"When it comes to Moses, again, you have a really larger-than-life
portrait,"
"...the 'larger than life' portraits of the Bible are unrealistic and
contradicted by the archaeological evidence." Dever, William G.
(March-April 2006). "The Western Cultural Tradition Is at Risk".
Biblical Archaeology Review 32 (2): 26 & 76.
said William Dever, a professor of archaeology from Lycoming
College. "I doubt that the miracles attributed to him ever took
place. I don't think he led three million Israelites out of Egypt
in an exodus across the Sinai. I don't think he was the founder
of Israelite religion, but
I think there was a Moses. I argue, and I think some other
archaeologists will, too, there was a small exodus group --
not millions of people, but perhaps a few thousand -- who
did escape from slavery in Egypt."
In spite of the total lack of evidence.
Just making sure yoou are aware that the bit about there being a Moses is NOT Dever speaking. It was idiot Bruno trying to make it look as if Dever said it.
And as I poiinted out to you at the time, if the quotes attributed to him were true when he said them for the TV program, they were not what he believes any more and provided you with more recent quotes to prove it. you still contiinued to lie about it.
%
2018-04-10 02:49:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You have not proven that the consensus is not what I said it was.
You just choose to believe those outside of the consensus.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Hobbit Lies
NUMBER 1
me (Joe Bruno change)
Aug 17
Post by v***@gmail.com
Not really a big deal since Moses did not exist, so they started from a false premise.
That'S A LIe
No, it is not a lie. It is the scientific consensus.
Post by v***@gmail.com
It's not like anybody here gives a fuck what YOU say. We have decided you have no pride and no integrity and you can't possibly be a Christian or you would not lie constantly.
HAHAHAHA! I'm NOT a Christian.I'm a Jew, you illiterate babbling jackass
That's not a lie it's just that at that time you were on one of your defend the Christian modes and it makes hard to know what the fuck you are aside from an asshole.
Cloud Hobbit
I know about him as well, I just forgot, it happens, get over it.
I think my record for accuracy far out distances him or you or any other creationist idiot.
BRUNO NOT A CREATIONIST
Post by v***@gmail.com
me (Joe Bruno change)
Apr 11
Post by Cloud Hobbit
http://youtu.be/lbq1TqJyExM
The traditional dichotomy has Creationists on one side and supporters of Evolution on the other. They might need a 3rd category for me.
I'm not a Creationist, but I have some doubts about evolution. "
This is the 3rd time I have proven you a LIAR on this same issue.
Still not a lie.
They already have a category for you, Doofus Aurelius.
That's a lie. I have said repeatedly I am not a creationist, nor do I advocate
the truth of intelligent design.I do not accept any of the 3 theories as
credible and probable.
Which means you are a moron and might as well be a creationist because you're stupid.
I have problems with evolution and I am not a creationist at all.Ben Carson, the famous neurosurgeon, does not base his objections on the bible, either. He says, after years of treating medical patients and performing surgery on them, that evolution simply does not
jive with what he has seen. My family doctor years ago said the same thing.
What sort of Jew would want to reference a religious moron like Ben Carson?
He certainly isn't basing his comments on science.
Then there's this lie of yours
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by Cloud Hobbit
"When it comes to Moses, again, you have a really larger-than-life
portrait,"
"...the 'larger than life' portraits of the Bible are unrealistic and
contradicted by the archaeological evidence." Dever, William G.
(March-April 2006). "The Western Cultural Tradition Is at Risk".
Biblical Archaeology Review 32 (2): 26 & 76.
said William Dever, a professor of archaeology from Lycoming
College. "I doubt that the miracles attributed to him ever took
place. I don't think he led three million Israelites out of Egypt
in an exodus across the Sinai. I don't think he was the founder
of Israelite religion, but
I think there was a Moses. I argue, and I think some other
archaeologists will, too, there was a small exodus group --
not millions of people, but perhaps a few thousand -- who
did escape from slavery in Egypt."
In spite of the total lack of evidence.
Just making sure yoou are aware that the bit about there being a Moses is NOT Dever speaking. It was idiot Bruno trying to make it look as if Dever said it.
And as I poiinted out to you at the time, if the quotes attributed to him were true when he said them for the TV program, they were not what he believes any more and provided you with more recent quotes to prove it. you still contiinued to lie about it.
so
hypatiab7
2018-04-09 21:10:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
SR
So much for your "consensus" that the exodus didn't happen. HAHAHAHAHA!
Not just his, sleeper.
sheesh ranjeesh
2018-04-10 01:03:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
/
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
SR
So much for your "consensus" that the exodus didn't happen. HAHAHAHAHA!
My consensus?

Show me the post where I claimed there was a "consensus".

Given that I have little knowledge and even less interest in
Biblical archaeology [1], I had no idea what the consensus in that field
might be, or even if there is any general agreement.

What I actually did do, on the other hand, was to take some of your posted articles
and see what independent commentary on their claims I could find.


For example, regarding your post "Director Posits Proof of Exodus" I posted
three links to sites investigating the claims made there. Did you look
look at even one of those?

I provided yet another link fact-checking the claims made in your
"New Film Proves Exodus Happened" post.
I'm guessing you didn't bother checking that one out either.

On your "Vast Majority of Egyptologists Believe Exodus Happened" I actually
went out and dug up the paper on which so extravagent a claim was made,
Hoffmeier's "Egyptologists and the Israelite Exodus from Egypt". Did you yourself
even bother looking for it, to see if it actually justified the claims in
the "Faith, Philosophy, and Science" article you linked to? I doubt it.

But I did. And I posted a number of reasons, extensively quoting Hoffmeier
himself, to show why that claim doesn't seem to be supported by
Hoffmeier's actual words. He certainly made no such claim there.

Did you even look at that post? Tell you what: I'll append it to
the end of this post for your perusal. All right?

And back to where we started: show me where I claimed any consensus
on the part of archaeologists and Egyptologists regarding the accuracy
of the account in Exodus:




SR


[1] the antics of Ron Wyatt excepted. Those never get old.


------------------------------------------------------------------

My comments on the Hoffmeier paper supposedly demonstrating that
the "Vast Majority of Egyptologists Believe Exodus Happened":


-- Hoffmeier asked 125 Egyptologists. Only 25 bothered to answer.

-- Hoffmeier excluded from his survey anyone whose opinion he already knew.

-- He asked the respondants if they had published on the topic. Only
five of the 25 had, and "...none had engaged in a major project".

-- Of the 20 out of 25 who said they had not published on the topic,
the reasons they gave for not having done so was that they had
no expertise, or had no interest in the topic, or it was too
specialized a topic for their area of expertise, or that they
didn't want to get into a debate that was so religiously loaded.
Nonetheless, they offered an answer.

-- Hoffmeier said he was surprised by the positive results, but
added that "...most gave no evidence of knowledge of the debates
of the past 30 years among Old Testament scholars and biblical
archaeologists on the origins of Israel."

-- He asked two additional questions to give the respondants why
they held the opinions they did, but "many left these questions
blank".

-- "Another theme that came up with some frequency was the recognition
that Egypt may never be able to produce positive archaeological
evidence for the Hebrews in Egypt because there were large numbers
of Semites in Egypt at various times during the Second Millennium B.C.
and it would be impossible to distinguish one group from another."

-- "80 percent [of all asked] were either not interested in matters of biblical
history or felt they lacked the expertise to offer anything
concrete to the origins of Israel debate".


Taking all this together, Hoffmeier's paper hardly strikes me as
overwhelming evidence for the vast majority of all Egyptlogists
agreeing that the exodus was a historical event. Only a self-selected
twenty percent even answered, and of those most had done no significant
research in the area, and in fact "gave no evidence of knowledge of the debates
of the past 30 years" on the topic.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 01:09:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Taking all this together, Hoffmeier's paper hardly strikes me as
overwhelming evidence for the vast majority of all Egyptlogists
agreeing that the exodus was a historical event. Only a self-selected
twenty percent even answered, and of those most had done no significant
research in the area, and in fact "gave no evidence of knowledge of the debates
of the past 30 years" on the topic.
____________

Art's mind is made up.
You can't confuse him with facts.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-10 01:17:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Taking all this together, Hoffmeier's paper hardly strikes me as
overwhelming evidence for the vast majority of all Egyptlogists
agreeing that the exodus was a historical event. Only a self-selected
twenty percent even answered, and of those most had done no significant
research in the area, and in fact "gave no evidence of knowledge of the debates
of the past 30 years" on the topic.
____________
Art's mind is made up.
You can't confuse him with facts.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 02:24:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Another evasion by Art.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-10 09:02:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Another evasion by Art.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 09:48:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Another evasion by Art.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
_____________

Yawn.

Pffft.

Nothing but gas.
Again.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 02:45:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Taking all this together, Hoffmeier's paper hardly strikes me as
overwhelming evidence for the vast majority of all Egyptlogists
agreeing that the exodus was a historical event. Only a self-selected
twenty percent even answered, and of those most had done no significant
research in the area, and in fact "gave no evidence of knowledge of the debates
of the past 30 years" on the topic.
____________
Art's mind is made up.
You can't confuse him with facts.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Hobbit Lies



NUMBER 1

me (Joe Bruno change)


Aug 17
Post by v***@gmail.com
Not really a big deal since Moses did not exist, so they started from a false premise.
That'S A LIe

No, it is not a lie. It is the scientific consensus.
Post by v***@gmail.com
It's not like anybody here gives a fuck what YOU say. We have decided you have no pride and no integrity and you can't possibly be a Christian or you would not lie constantly.
HAHAHAHA! I'm NOT a Christian.I'm a Jew, you illiterate babbling jackass


That's not a lie it's just that at that time you were on one of your defend the Christian modes and it makes hard to know what the fuck you are aside from an asshole.

Cloud Hobbit

I know about him as well, I just forgot, it happens, get over it.
I think my record for accuracy far out distances him or you or any other creationist idiot.


BRUNO NOT A CREATIONIST
Post by v***@gmail.com
me (Joe Bruno change)
Apr 11
Post by sheesh ranjeesh

The traditional dichotomy has Creationists on one side and supporters of Evolution on the other. They might need a 3rd category for me.
I'm not a Creationist, but I have some doubts about evolution. "
This is the 3rd time I have proven you a LIAR on this same issue.
Still not a lie.
They already have a category for you, Doofus Aurelius.

Next you say:
That's a lie. I have said repeatedly I am not a creationist, nor do I advocate
the truth of intelligent design.I do not accept any of the 3 theories as
credible and probable.


Which means you are a moron and might as well be a creationist because you're stupid.

Then there's this:
I have problems with evolution and I am not a creationist at all.Ben Carson, the famous neurosurgeon, does not base his objections on the bible, either. He says, after years of treating medical patients and performing surgery on them, that evolution simply does not
jive with what he has seen. My family doctor years ago said the same thing.


What sort of Jew would want to reference a religious moron like Ben Carson?
He certainly isn't basing his comments on science.

Then there's this lie of yours
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
"When it comes to Moses, again, you have a really larger-than-life
portrait,"
"...the 'larger than life' portraits of the Bible are unrealistic and
contradicted by the archaeological evidence." Dever, William G.
(March-April 2006). "The Western Cultural Tradition Is at Risk".
Biblical Archaeology Review 32 (2): 26 & 76.
said William Dever, a professor of archaeology from Lycoming
College. "I doubt that the miracles attributed to him ever took
place. I don't think he led three million Israelites out of Egypt
in an exodus across the Sinai. I don't think he was the founder
of Israelite religion, but
I think there was a Moses. I argue, and I think some other
archaeologists will, too, there was a small exodus group --
not millions of people, but perhaps a few thousand -- who
did escape from slavery in Egypt."
In spite of the total lack of evidence.
Just making sure yoou are aware that the bit about there being a Moses is NOT Dever speaking. It was idiot Bruno trying to make it look as if Dever said it.
And as I poiinted out to you at the time, if the quotes attributed to him were true when he said them for the TV program, they were not what he believes any more and provided you with more recent quotes to prove it. you still contiinued to lie about it.
%
2018-04-10 02:48:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Taking all this together, Hoffmeier's paper hardly strikes me as
overwhelming evidence for the vast majority of all Egyptlogists
agreeing that the exodus was a historical event. Only a self-selected
twenty percent even answered, and of those most had done no significant
research in the area, and in fact "gave no evidence of knowledge of the debates
of the past 30 years" on the topic.
____________
Art's mind is made up.
You can't confuse him with facts.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Hobbit Lies
NUMBER 1
me (Joe Bruno change)
Aug 17
Post by v***@gmail.com
Not really a big deal since Moses did not exist, so they started from a false premise.
That'S A LIe
No, it is not a lie. It is the scientific consensus.
Post by v***@gmail.com
It's not like anybody here gives a fuck what YOU say. We have decided you have no pride and no integrity and you can't possibly be a Christian or you would not lie constantly.
HAHAHAHA! I'm NOT a Christian.I'm a Jew, you illiterate babbling jackass
That's not a lie it's just that at that time you were on one of your defend the Christian modes and it makes hard to know what the fuck you are aside from an asshole.
Cloud Hobbit
I know about him as well, I just forgot, it happens, get over it.
I think my record for accuracy far out distances him or you or any other creationist idiot.
BRUNO NOT A CREATIONIST
Post by v***@gmail.com
me (Joe Bruno change)
Apr 11
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
http://youtu.be/lbq1TqJyExM
The traditional dichotomy has Creationists on one side and supporters of Evolution on the other. They might need a 3rd category for me.
I'm not a Creationist, but I have some doubts about evolution. "
This is the 3rd time I have proven you a LIAR on this same issue.
Still not a lie.
They already have a category for you, Doofus Aurelius.
That's a lie. I have said repeatedly I am not a creationist, nor do I advocate
the truth of intelligent design.I do not accept any of the 3 theories as
credible and probable.
Which means you are a moron and might as well be a creationist because you're stupid.
I have problems with evolution and I am not a creationist at all.Ben Carson, the famous neurosurgeon, does not base his objections on the bible, either. He says, after years of treating medical patients and performing surgery on them, that evolution simply does not
jive with what he has seen. My family doctor years ago said the same thing.
What sort of Jew would want to reference a religious moron like Ben Carson?
He certainly isn't basing his comments on science.
Then there's this lie of yours
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
"When it comes to Moses, again, you have a really larger-than-life
portrait,"
"...the 'larger than life' portraits of the Bible are unrealistic and
contradicted by the archaeological evidence." Dever, William G.
(March-April 2006). "The Western Cultural Tradition Is at Risk".
Biblical Archaeology Review 32 (2): 26 & 76.
said William Dever, a professor of archaeology from Lycoming
College. "I doubt that the miracles attributed to him ever took
place. I don't think he led three million Israelites out of Egypt
in an exodus across the Sinai. I don't think he was the founder
of Israelite religion, but
I think there was a Moses. I argue, and I think some other
archaeologists will, too, there was a small exodus group --
not millions of people, but perhaps a few thousand -- who
did escape from slavery in Egypt."
In spite of the total lack of evidence.
Just making sure yoou are aware that the bit about there being a Moses is NOT Dever speaking. It was idiot Bruno trying to make it look as if Dever said it.
And as I poiinted out to you at the time, if the quotes attributed to him were true when he said them for the TV program, they were not what he believes any more and provided you with more recent quotes to prove it. you still contiinued to lie about it.
so
Don Martin
2018-04-10 02:27:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 18:03:37 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
/
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
SR
So much for your "consensus" that the exodus didn't happen. HAHAHAHAHA!
My consensus?
Show me the post where I claimed there was a "consensus".
Given that I have little knowledge and even less interest in
Biblical archaeology [1], I had no idea what the consensus in that field
might be, or even if there is any general agreement.
What I actually did do, on the other hand, was to take some of your posted articles
and see what independent commentary on their claims I could find.
For example, regarding your post "Director Posits Proof of Exodus" I posted
three links to sites investigating the claims made there. Did you look
look at even one of those?
I provided yet another link fact-checking the claims made in your
"New Film Proves Exodus Happened" post.
I'm guessing you didn't bother checking that one out either.
On your "Vast Majority of Egyptologists Believe Exodus Happened" I actually
went out and dug up the paper on which so extravagent a claim was made,
Hoffmeier's "Egyptologists and the Israelite Exodus from Egypt". Did you yourself
even bother looking for it, to see if it actually justified the claims in
the "Faith, Philosophy, and Science" article you linked to? I doubt it.
But I did. And I posted a number of reasons, extensively quoting Hoffmeier
himself, to show why that claim doesn't seem to be supported by
Hoffmeier's actual words. He certainly made no such claim there.
Did you even look at that post? Tell you what: I'll append it to
the end of this post for your perusal. All right?
And back to where we started: show me where I claimed any consensus
on the part of archaeologists and Egyptologists regarding the accuracy
While one can admire your diligence, I am afraid that attempts to
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Dreamer In Colore
2018-04-10 02:35:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:27:09 -0400, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 18:03:37 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
/
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
SR
So much for your "consensus" that the exodus didn't happen. HAHAHAHAHA!
My consensus?
Show me the post where I claimed there was a "consensus".
Given that I have little knowledge and even less interest in
Biblical archaeology [1], I had no idea what the consensus in that field
might be, or even if there is any general agreement.
What I actually did do, on the other hand, was to take some of your posted articles
and see what independent commentary on their claims I could find.
For example, regarding your post "Director Posits Proof of Exodus" I posted
three links to sites investigating the claims made there. Did you look
look at even one of those?
I provided yet another link fact-checking the claims made in your
"New Film Proves Exodus Happened" post.
I'm guessing you didn't bother checking that one out either.
On your "Vast Majority of Egyptologists Believe Exodus Happened" I actually
went out and dug up the paper on which so extravagent a claim was made,
Hoffmeier's "Egyptologists and the Israelite Exodus from Egypt". Did you yourself
even bother looking for it, to see if it actually justified the claims in
the "Faith, Philosophy, and Science" article you linked to? I doubt it.
But I did. And I posted a number of reasons, extensively quoting Hoffmeier
himself, to show why that claim doesn't seem to be supported by
Hoffmeier's actual words. He certainly made no such claim there.
Did you even look at that post? Tell you what: I'll append it to
the end of this post for your perusal. All right?
And back to where we started: show me where I claimed any consensus
on the part of archaeologists and Egyptologists regarding the accuracy
While one can admire your diligence, I am afraid that attempts to
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
Don't underestimate the sheer pleasure of demonstration, Dr. M.
--
Cheers,
Dreamer
AA 2306

"If God listened to the prayers of men, all men would quickly have
perished: for they are forever praying for evil against one another."

Epicurus
Don Martin
2018-04-10 21:38:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:35:06 -0400, Dreamer In Colore
Post by Dreamer In Colore
On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:27:09 -0400, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 18:03:37 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
/
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
SR
So much for your "consensus" that the exodus didn't happen. HAHAHAHAHA!
My consensus?
Show me the post where I claimed there was a "consensus".
Given that I have little knowledge and even less interest in
Biblical archaeology [1], I had no idea what the consensus in that field
might be, or even if there is any general agreement.
What I actually did do, on the other hand, was to take some of your posted articles
and see what independent commentary on their claims I could find.
For example, regarding your post "Director Posits Proof of Exodus" I posted
three links to sites investigating the claims made there. Did you look
look at even one of those?
I provided yet another link fact-checking the claims made in your
"New Film Proves Exodus Happened" post.
I'm guessing you didn't bother checking that one out either.
On your "Vast Majority of Egyptologists Believe Exodus Happened" I actually
went out and dug up the paper on which so extravagent a claim was made,
Hoffmeier's "Egyptologists and the Israelite Exodus from Egypt". Did you yourself
even bother looking for it, to see if it actually justified the claims in
the "Faith, Philosophy, and Science" article you linked to? I doubt it.
But I did. And I posted a number of reasons, extensively quoting Hoffmeier
himself, to show why that claim doesn't seem to be supported by
Hoffmeier's actual words. He certainly made no such claim there.
Did you even look at that post? Tell you what: I'll append it to
the end of this post for your perusal. All right?
And back to where we started: show me where I claimed any consensus
on the part of archaeologists and Egyptologists regarding the accuracy
While one can admire your diligence, I am afraid that attempts to
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
Don't underestimate the sheer pleasure of demonstration, Dr. M.
I am just too shy. Near schools, I frequently pass a sign that says,
"Fines Doubled When Flashing," and I carefully check my fly.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 02:51:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 18:03:37 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
/
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
SR
So much for your "consensus" that the exodus didn't happen. HAHAHAHAHA!
My consensus?
Show me the post where I claimed there was a "consensus".
Given that I have little knowledge and even less interest in
Biblical archaeology [1], I had no idea what the consensus in that field
might be, or even if there is any general agreement.
What I actually did do, on the other hand, was to take some of your posted articles
and see what independent commentary on their claims I could find.
For example, regarding your post "Director Posits Proof of Exodus" I posted
three links to sites investigating the claims made there. Did you look
look at even one of those?
I provided yet another link fact-checking the claims made in your
"New Film Proves Exodus Happened" post.
I'm guessing you didn't bother checking that one out either.
On your "Vast Majority of Egyptologists Believe Exodus Happened" I actually
went out and dug up the paper on which so extravagent a claim was made,
Hoffmeier's "Egyptologists and the Israelite Exodus from Egypt". Did you yourself
even bother looking for it, to see if it actually justified the claims in
the "Faith, Philosophy, and Science" article you linked to? I doubt it.
But I did. And I posted a number of reasons, extensively quoting Hoffmeier
himself, to show why that claim doesn't seem to be supported by
Hoffmeier's actual words. He certainly made no such claim there.
Did you even look at that post? Tell you what: I'll append it to
the end of this post for your perusal. All right?
And back to where we started: show me where I claimed any consensus
on the part of archaeologists and Egyptologists regarding the accuracy
While one can admire your diligence, I am afraid that attempts to
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
I know. I do like to have him show himself for the liar he is though. It's one of the reasons I don't always just post a link but include much of a source that I refer to so he can't say he didn't see it. At least not honestly.
Iknow it's redundant to say he is a liar and a moron.

I still think he's jerking our chain and that he'sa total fraud who knows what he says is nuts because like aaa he plans it that way just to frustrate and annoy us.

Perhaps it's time to ignore him and Assroid along with Duke.
They never hav e anytiing much to say that isn't already known to be a lie and their entrtainment values is about used up.
Post by Don Martin
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-10 21:56:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Don Martin
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 18:03:37 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
/
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
SR
So much for your "consensus" that the exodus didn't happen. HAHAHAHAHA!
My consensus?
Show me the post where I claimed there was a "consensus".
Given that I have little knowledge and even less interest in
Biblical archaeology [1], I had no idea what the consensus in that field
might be, or even if there is any general agreement.
What I actually did do, on the other hand, was to take some of your posted articles
and see what independent commentary on their claims I could find.
For example, regarding your post "Director Posits Proof of Exodus" I posted
three links to sites investigating the claims made there. Did you look
look at even one of those?
I provided yet another link fact-checking the claims made in your
"New Film Proves Exodus Happened" post.
I'm guessing you didn't bother checking that one out either.
On your "Vast Majority of Egyptologists Believe Exodus Happened" I actually
went out and dug up the paper on which so extravagent a claim was made,
Hoffmeier's "Egyptologists and the Israelite Exodus from Egypt". Did you yourself
even bother looking for it, to see if it actually justified the claims in
the "Faith, Philosophy, and Science" article you linked to? I doubt it.
But I did. And I posted a number of reasons, extensively quoting Hoffmeier
himself, to show why that claim doesn't seem to be supported by
Hoffmeier's actual words. He certainly made no such claim there.
Did you even look at that post? Tell you what: I'll append it to
the end of this post for your perusal. All right?
And back to where we started: show me where I claimed any consensus
on the part of archaeologists and Egyptologists regarding the accuracy
While one can admire your diligence, I am afraid that attempts to
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
I know. I do like to have him show himself for the liar he is though. It's one of the reasons I don't always just post a link but include much of a source that I refer to so he can't say he didn't see it. At least not honestly.
Iknow it's redundant to say he is a liar and a moron.
I still think he's jerking our chain and that he'sa total fraud who knows what he says is nuts because like aaa he plans it that way just to frustrate and annoy us.
Perhaps it's time to ignore him and Assroid along with Duke.
They never hav e anytiing much to say that isn't already known to be a lie and their entrtainment values is about used up.
Post by Don Martin
--
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-10 21:55:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 18:03:37 -0700 (PDT), sheesh ranjeesh
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
/
/
Post by v***@gmail.com
Post by sheesh ranjeesh
Post by John Locke
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
He certainly has been in full Gish gallop mode on this one.
SR
So much for your "consensus" that the exodus didn't happen. HAHAHAHAHA!
My consensus?
Show me the post where I claimed there was a "consensus".
Given that I have little knowledge and even less interest in
Biblical archaeology [1], I had no idea what the consensus in that field
might be, or even if there is any general agreement.
What I actually did do, on the other hand, was to take some of your posted articles
and see what independent commentary on their claims I could find.
For example, regarding your post "Director Posits Proof of Exodus" I posted
three links to sites investigating the claims made there. Did you look
look at even one of those?
I provided yet another link fact-checking the claims made in your
"New Film Proves Exodus Happened" post.
I'm guessing you didn't bother checking that one out either.
On your "Vast Majority of Egyptologists Believe Exodus Happened" I actually
went out and dug up the paper on which so extravagent a claim was made,
Hoffmeier's "Egyptologists and the Israelite Exodus from Egypt". Did you yourself
even bother looking for it, to see if it actually justified the claims in
the "Faith, Philosophy, and Science" article you linked to? I doubt it.
But I did. And I posted a number of reasons, extensively quoting Hoffmeier
himself, to show why that claim doesn't seem to be supported by
Hoffmeier's actual words. He certainly made no such claim there.
Did you even look at that post? Tell you what: I'll append it to
the end of this post for your perusal. All right?
And back to where we started: show me where I claimed any consensus
on the part of archaeologists and Egyptologists regarding the accuracy
While one can admire your diligence, I am afraid that attempts to
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
--
Of course you cannot prove that. More lies.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-10 22:42:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
attempts to
Post by Don Martin
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
--
Of course you cannot prove that. More lies.
______________

IOW when you post a link to your supposed evidence you know that it contradicts whatever point you are trying to prove.

You have done this too many times. That you refuse to believe it is not proof of anything other than your laziness and incompetence.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-11 00:04:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
attempts to
Post by Don Martin
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
--
Of course you cannot prove that. More lies.
______________
IOW when you post a link to your supposed evidence you know that it contradicts whatever point you are trying to prove.
You have done this too many times. That you refuse to believe it is not proof of anything other than your laziness and incompetence.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Cloud Hobbit
2018-04-11 00:19:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
attempts to
Post by Don Martin
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
--
Of course you cannot prove that. More lies.
______________
IOW when you post a link to your supposed evidence you know that it contradicts whatever point you are trying to prove.
You have done this too many times. That you refuse to believe it is not proof of anything other than your laziness and incompetence.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Art concedes he has nothing.
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-11 00:23:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Don Martin
attempts to
Post by Don Martin
educate Artie Jo are doomed to failure. He will not read your links,
given that he obviously does not even read his own.
--
Of course you cannot prove that. More lies.
______________
IOW when you post a link to your supposed evidence you know that it contradicts whatever point you are trying to prove.
You have done this too many times. That you refuse to believe it is not proof of anything other than your laziness and incompetence.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
Art concedes he has nothing.
https://tinyurl.com/yaycgmwz
hypatiab7
2018-04-09 21:07:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
It's almost as though, since he can't convert to Christianity, he's doing
his best to ruin Judaism. Does his family know they have a New Age snake
in their midst?
v***@gmail.com
2018-04-09 21:25:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by John Locke
manipulative, pretentious, badly researched and full of errors and
dating problems. Total hogwash.
_________________
Just like all of Madjoe's "evidence" on the Exodus.
He does more to prove it is a myth and not history than he ever intended.
Supposedly, because he doesn't bother to actually read what he links to. After as much time as he has spent here and the numerous times he's been found to have done this you would think he should have learned by now.
It's almost as though, since he can't convert to Christianity, he's doing
his best to ruin Judaism. Does his family know they have a New Age snake
in their midst?
https://tinyurl.com/yd9udvlz
hypatiab7
2018-04-09 20:41:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
So, you're saying that your Yahweh murdered all the people on Santorini and
caused the end of the Minoan kingdom as well as causing tsunamis that
killed even more people and caused plagues and other disasters in various
places just so his so-called chosen people could leave Egypt? What a first
class bastard your Hebrew god of the myths was.

And, if you, personally, aren't saying this, why did you even bother to post this cruddy article?
Hollis Brown Jr.
2018-04-10 12:55:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by v***@gmail.com
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/director-posits-proof-of-biblical-exodus/article1098090/
Historicity

"The scholarly consensus is that the figure of Moses is legendary, and not historical,[8] although a "Moses-like figure may have existed somewhere in the southern Transjordan in the mid-late 13th century B.C."[31] Certainly no Egyptian sources mention Moses or the events of Exodus-Deuteronomy, nor has any archaeological evidence been discovered in Egypt or the Sinai wilderness to support the story in which he is the central figure."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses
Loading...