More Published Facts About Charles Darwin

raven1

2016-10-25 17:17:58 UTC

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:58:17 -0400, Bob <***@null.null> wrote:

Wow. Refresh my memory: aren't you the whiny little bitch who's always
complaining (incorrectly) about Argumentum ad Hominem?

tirebiter

2016-10-25 17:36:38 UTC

Post by Bob
http://youtu.be/6dUcFDZxZRo

Of course I won't even click on that nonsense, but I have a question for
bob. What's with all the Darwin bashing? Didn't he die before Edison
patented his version of the light bulb? Apparently you hate the theory
of evolution, but even if Darwin had never lived, it would still exist
today. After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence. Considering what Darwin had to work with, he
was amazingly accurate, but that was over 150 years ago. There have
been a few technological advances since then which have provided even
more factual evidence to support the theory.

Maybe you should focus on something less crazy, such as invoking the
Wright brothers when discussing the aerodynamics of the F-14 Tomcat.

---
a.a. #2276

Bob

2016-10-25 19:12:53 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.

More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.

http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/

You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?

Zero.

You're losing, chump. Get used to it.

<smirk>

W.T.S., ge2 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-25 20:07:11 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.

Only in your sick, degenerate dreams, "Bob".

Post by Bob
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.

Only in your sick, degenerate dreams, "Bob".

Post by Bob
http://www.bullshit.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.

Actually, most of them leave creationism to become Evolutionists, once
they have studied the scientific data.

Post by Bob
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

<bitch slap> Educate yourself, "Bob":

<https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zascach>

<http://tinyurl.com/j9nkey5>

<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6360/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zvyyhxn>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_replication>

<http://tinyurl.com/goxgec9>

<https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-
berlinski/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>

<https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate>

<http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>

<http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>

<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/unintelligent-design.html?
_r=0>

<http://tinyurl.com/h7ubjta>

<http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy>

<http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>

<https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked>

<http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>

<http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>

<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review>

<http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>

<http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/>

<http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>

<http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16>

<http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin>

<http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel>

<http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>

<http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/>

<http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>

<http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html>

<http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>

"Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould>

<http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>

<http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>

<http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys>

<http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>

<http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home>

<http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>

<http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falldidit#Falldidit>

<http://tinyurl.com/z4z77ra>

raven1

2016-10-25 20:49:01 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.

None of the videos you post support that notion. They're just the same
old tired canards that have been refuted endlessly.

Post by Bob
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/

The number of scientists doing so represent a tiny fraction of all
scientists, almost none in relevant fields. And I would venture that
virtually all of them started as Creationists, rather than coming
around to that position based on evidence, since there is none for ID.

Post by Bob
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.

How do you know that? Answer: you don't, you pulled that out of your
ass.

Post by Bob
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.

You already lost, decades ago. Get over it.

Post by Bob
<smirk>

Marvin Sebourn

2016-10-25 22:38:13 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

And to "support" this, Dr. John MacArthur, speaker in Bob's referenced URL said:

1) "ninety-nine percent of the universities in America are Darwinian".

2) "...ninety-three percent of the National Science Academy describe themselves as atheist..." I assume MacArthur misspoke here, or did not know that the National Science Academy is an Indian organization. Did he mean the National Academy of Sciences?

3) "...one poll says that 98.7 percent of evolutionary biologists are atheists..."

Recapping: 99% of the universities in America are Darwinian. 93% of NAS members call themselves atheist. 98.7% of evolutionary biologists are atheist, in one poll.

Systematic refutation? No.

Marvin Sebourn
***@aol.com

Bob

2016-10-26 03:50:43 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

And to "support" this, Dr. John MacArthur, speaker in Bob's
1) "ninety-nine percent of the universities in America are
Darwinian".
2) "...ninety-three percent of the National Science Academy describe
themselves as atheist..."
3) "...one poll says that 98.7 percent of evolutionary biologists
areatheists..."
Systematic refutation? No.

The answer is still "Yes." The problem is you seem to think "systematic"
is just another way of saying "immediately", or "all at once". That's
where you're line of logic fails.

Lets just sit back and calmly watch as the list of those who have
publicly signed the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism Statement grows
steadily (and exponentially) larger and larger, shall we?

And here's the thing: it will continue to grow, and never decrease. Okay?
That's all you really need to be concerned with.

It's all just a matter of time.

You're welcome.

<g>

raven1

2016-10-26 12:29:48 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

More scientists named Steve have declared their support for the ToE
than the total number of scientists who have signed your statement.
https://ncse.com/project-steve

You really are a hopelessly gullible yokel. There is no controversy
over evolution in the scientific community, other than from a handful
of cranks who dissent for what are inevitably religious reasons.

Andrew

2016-10-26 15:03:20 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

More scientists named Steve have declared their support for the ToE
than the total number of scientists who have signed your statement.
https://ncse.com/project-steve

They say.

"All living things share a common ancestry. . here is no
serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that
natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence."

They believe in the "goo to you" story.

Natural selection prevents evolution by
weeding out variants.

Those folk believe in unscientific fantasy.

It is their 'religion' that they accept 'by faith'.

W.T.S., dx6 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-26 15:36:33 UTC

"Andrew" <***@usa.net> wrote in news:_-OdnXhfpLAlWI3FnZ2dnUU7-***@earthlink.com:

<https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zascach>

http://youtu.be/DjFgcOId-ZY

<http://tinyurl.com/j9nkey5>

<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6360/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zvyyhxn>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_replication>

<http://tinyurl.com/goxgec9>

<https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-
berlinski/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>

<https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate>

<http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>

<http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>

<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/unintelligent-design.html?
_r=0>

<http://tinyurl.com/h7ubjta>

<http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy>

<http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>

<https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked>

<http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>

<http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>

<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review>

<http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>

<http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/>

<http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>

<http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16>

<http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin>

<http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel>

<http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>

<http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/>

<http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>

<http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html>

<http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>

"Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould>

<http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>

<http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>

<http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys>

<http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>

<http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home>

<http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>

http://youtu.be/F1ibEaIPtMk

<http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falldidit#Falldidit>

<http://tinyurl.com/z4z77ra>

raven1

2016-10-26 22:18:11 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

More scientists named Steve have declared their support for the ToE
than the total number of scientists who have signed your statement.
https://ncse.com/project-steve

They say.
"All living things share a common ancestry

Know who else says that? Michael Behe. Yeah, the ID guy accepts common
descent. He just thinks God, um, an unnamed intelligent designer,
tinkered with the process at some unspecified point.

Andrew

2016-10-27 00:44:07 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

More scientists named Steve have declared their support for the ToE
than the total number of scientists who have signed your statement.
https://ncse.com/project-steve

They say.
"All living things share a common ancestry

Know who else says that? Michael Behe.
Yeah, the ID guy accepts common descent.

So do I, in the sense that we all share a common
Creator - because there is solid evidence for that.

Especially in the common molecule that carries
genetic information for all living things > DNA.

We all share a "common Creator" --> God.

He is so awesome!

Glory to Him.

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:06:48 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

And to "support" this, Dr. John MacArthur, speaker in Bob's
1) "ninety-nine percent of the universities in America are
Darwinian".
2) "...ninety-three percent of the National Science Academy
describe themselves as atheist..."
3) "...one poll says that 98.7 percent of evolutionary biologists
areatheists..."
Systematic refutation? No.

More scientists named Steve have declared their support for the ToE
than the total number of scientists who have signed your statement.
https://ncse.com/project-steve

They say.
"All living things share a common ancestry

Know who else says that? Michael Behe.
Yeah, the ID guy accepts common descent.

So do I, in the sense that we all share a common
Creator - because there is solid evidence for that.
Especially in the common molecule that carries
genetic information for all living things > DNA.
We all share a "common Creator" --> God.
He is so awesome!
Glory to Him.

More like fuck Him and you both, Andrew86:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:03:56 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

And to "support" this, Dr. John MacArthur, speaker in Bob's
1) "ninety-nine percent of the universities in America are
Darwinian".
2) "...ninety-three percent of the National Science Academy
describe themselves as atheist..."
3) "...one poll says that 98.7 percent of evolutionary biologists
areatheists..."
Systematic refutation? No.

More scientists named Steve have declared their support for the ToE
than the total number of scientists who have signed your statement.
https://ncse.com/project-steve

They say.
"All living things share a common ancestry. . here is no
serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that
natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence."
They believe in the "goo to you" story.
Natural selection prevents evolution by
weeding out variants.
Those folk believe in unscientific fantasy.
It is their 'religion' that they accept 'by faith'.

And here we have creationists and ID advocates admiting
they have nothing:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

Christopher A. Lee

2016-10-26 15:47:19 UTC

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:29:48 -0400, raven1

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.

An outright lie.

But then that's well we ever get from this individual.

Post by Bob
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.

The proven serial liar knows there is no such thing as Darwinism for
the same reason there are no Newtonism, Einsteinism, Faradayism etc.

If he means evolution, he should say so.

But there is no scientific dissent from that, either. Because it is
the label for a set of observed facts that won't un-happen.

Post by Bob
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?

There's no such thing as an evolutionist, either. A couple of
centuries ago, the word was legitimate, but evolution is a well
researched, well understood objective fact that won't go away.

And there are no practicing who are creationist, because creationism
is unscientific nonsense.

Post by Bob
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

He imagines his lies and insults are funny?

Post by Marvin Sebourn
And to "support" this, Dr. John MacArthur, speaker in Bob's
1) "ninety-nine percent of the universities in America are
Darwinian".

Darwinian, not Darwinist.

Darwinian, in today's context, applies to how things survided to pass
on the survival factors to s ubseqyent generations, and doesn't just
apply to biological evolution.

Post by Marvin Sebourn
2) "...ninety-three percent of the National Science Academy describe
themselves as atheist..."
3) "...one poll says that 98.7 percent of evolutionary biologists
areatheists..."
Systematic refutation? No.

What a fucking moron.

Anybody who knows the slightest thing about science and the scientific
method, knows just how much bullshit that is.

Post by raven1
More scientists named Steve have declared their support for the ToE
than the total number of scientists who have signed your statement.
https://ncse.com/project-steve

DonExodus2 published a video on Youtube, where he debunked the
Discovery "Institute" claim - he emailed those on the list, many of
whom weren't even scientists, many of whom didn't even know they were
on it and others who had aked to be taken off it but this hadn't been
done.

Post by raven1
You really are a hopelessly gullible yokel. There is no controversy
over evolution in the scientific community, other than from a handful
of cranks who dissent for what are inevitably religious reasons.

What makes it worse, is that he is so in-your-face with this stupidity
and dishonesty.

Joe Bruno

2016-10-25 23:56:14 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

I used to accept evolution. Then, 2 things happened:

1. I started to investigate and think for myself

2. I came here and found out that evolutionists are chronic liars.

j***@gmail.com

2016-10-26 03:51:51 UTC

7:56 PMJoe Bruno
- show quoted text -
I used to accept evolution. Then, 2 things happened:

1. I started to investigate and think for myself

2. I came here and found out that evolutionists are chronic liars.
..........

Maybe you take "here" too seriously?

Cloud Hobbit

2016-10-26 08:49:41 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

Are your eyes brown? You are so full of shit.
Most of the people on that list have no background in biology, as in about 80%
More and more people are not abandoning evolution in favor of what?
Why would scientists keep us from knowing that evolution is false?
You still got it.
Nothing that is.

Bob

2016-10-26 09:16:14 UTC

You can not be rejected by what does not exist.

But you can be rejected by who you believe does not exist.

W.T.S., ge2 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-26 10:40:18 UTC

You can not be rejected by what does not exist.

But you can be rejected by who you believe does not exist.

Here's what actually exists, "Bob":

http://youtu.be/DjFgcOId-ZY

<http://tinyurl.com/j9nkey5>

This will give you a complete education in what exists and doesn't
exist, "Bob".

hypatiab7

2016-10-26 18:38:12 UTC

You can not be rejected by what does not exist.

But you can be rejected by who you believe does not exist.

A threat that is no threat at all to an atheist. You are incapable of understanding this, since you are trapped in your tiny religious box.

Atheists don't believe you religiously and abhor you personally.

Cloud Hobbit

2016-10-27 01:06:57 UTC

You can not be rejected by what does not exist.

But you can be rejected by who you believe does not exist.

Then prove that he exists.

Not that it matters if I'm already doomed.

You can not prove your god exists. Until you can, nobody here gives 2 shits for any of the crap you post. If your god could be proven to exist, I doubt you would be who we'd be hearing it from.

You still have nothing.

Bob

2016-10-27 04:24:41 UTC

Post by Cloud Hobbit

You can not be rejected by what does not exist.

But you can be rejected by who you believe does not exist.

Then prove that he exists.

I've stated many times that the existence of God cannot be empirically
proven.

"Therefore, to ask for scientifically testable, material, non-transcendent
evidence for an immaterial, transcendent God is the wrong approach
because it is a category mistake."

http://carm.org/atheist-error-asking-for-material-evidence-for-god

But now the burden of proof is on you, by your assertion above, to prove
that God "does not exist".

And if you say, "Negatives can't be proven.", then that makes your bold
assertion above completely moot and non-nonsensical at best, or else a
totally fabricated lie at worst. Take your pick.

The bottom line is you got nothing.

Yes, you're more than welcome.

<smirk>

Hint: Neither can the non-existence of God be proven. So your statement
above is moot.

And you got nothing.

<smirk>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:08:40 UTC

You can not be rejected by what does not exist.

But you can be rejected by who you believe does not exist.

Here, creationists and ID advocates refute their nonsense on the
witness stand:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

Andrew

2016-10-26 15:18:02 UTC

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Why would scientists keep us from knowing that evolution is false?

Real scientists know that "goo to you" is unworkable, and is a
grand deception. I'm talking about scientists who adhere to the
scientific method and who reject fantasy. Those who value the
truth.

W.T.S., dx6 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-26 15:37:30 UTC

"Andrew" <***@usa.net> wrote in news:d7ydnadl79u3VI3FnZ2dnUU7-***@earthlink.com:

<https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zascach>

http://youtu.be/DjFgcOId-ZY

<http://tinyurl.com/j9nkey5>

<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6360/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zvyyhxn>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_replication>

<http://tinyurl.com/goxgec9>

<https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-
berlinski/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>

<https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate>

<http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>

<http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>

<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/unintelligent-design.html?
_r=0>

<http://tinyurl.com/h7ubjta>

<http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy>

<http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>

<https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked>

<http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>

<http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>

<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review>

<http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>

<http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/>

<http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>

<http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16>

<http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin>

<http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel>

<http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>

<http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/>

<http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>

<http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html>

<http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>

"Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould>

<http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>

<http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>

<http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys>

<http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>

<http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home>

<http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>

http://youtu.be/F1ibEaIPtMk

<http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falldidit#Falldidit>

<http://tinyurl.com/z4z77ra>

Bob

2016-10-26 15:42:43 UTC

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Why would scientists keep us from knowing that evolution is false?

Real scientists know that "goo to you" is unworkable, and is a
grand deception. I'm talking about scientists who adhere to the
scientific method and who reject fantasy. Those who value the
truth.

Well said.

W.T.S., dx6 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-26 16:17:53 UTC

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Why would scientists keep us from knowing that evolution is false?

Real scientists know that "goo to you" is unworkable, and is a
grand deception. I'm talking about scientists who adhere to the
scientific method and who reject fantasy. Those who value the
truth.

Well said.

Pure, lying, bull shit. Educate yourself, "Bob":

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:12:01 UTC

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Why would scientists keep us from knowing that evolution is false?

Real scientists know that "goo to you" is unworkable, and is a
grand deception. I'm talking about scientists who adhere to the
scientific method and who reject fantasy. Those who value the
truth.

Well said.

This really was "well said", under oath:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:10:27 UTC

Post by Cloud Hobbit
Why would scientists keep us from knowing that evolution is false?

Real scientists know that "goo to you" is unworkable, and is a
grand deception. I'm talking about scientists who adhere to the
scientific method and who reject fantasy. Those who value the
truth.

You mean the truth under oath, on the witness stand:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

tirebiter

2016-10-26 11:05:12 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

And I could say that more and more sightings of 100 foot tall dinosaurs
are being reported in every large city on earth every day. And just
like your laughable fantasy, I can't back it up because it's not true.

Please present VALID evidence, such as peer reviewed articles from
reputable publications, not creationist videos.

You don't just refute a scientific theory. You have to replace it with
a fact based alternative. And there's no factual data in creationism.

Post by Bob
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.

Yeah, I can finally agree with one of your batshit crazy statements.
BTW, it's not anything to be proud of.

Post by Bob
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

You're not even target practice. Your arguments are old and stale and
even less compelling than what's expected from even a mediocre
commonplace troll. I'd accuse you of being a Poe but you don't seem
to be bright enough to pull it off.

---
a.a. #2276

Bob

2016-10-26 12:09:19 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

And I could say that more and more sightings of 100 foot tall dinosaurs
are being reported in every large city on earth every day. And just
like your laughable fantasy, I can't back it up because it's not true.
Please present VALID evidence, such as peer reviewed articles from
reputable publications, not creationist videos.
You don't just refute a scientific theory. You have to replace it with
a fact based alternative. And there's no factual data in creationism.

Q: How can I tell that you haven't been watching the videos I've been
posting links to?

A: Because you're wrong.

But, that's okay with me. You're born to be wrong.

And here's why you're wrong now:

"Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe
what is false, in order that all may be condemned who did not believe
the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
(2 Thessalonians 2:11-12)

You got it?

You're welcome.

<smirk>

tirebiter

2016-10-26 14:45:48 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

And I could say that more and more sightings of 100 foot tall dinosaurs
are being reported in every large city on earth every day. And just
like your laughable fantasy, I can't back it up because it's not true.
Please present VALID evidence, such as peer reviewed articles from
reputable publications, not creationist videos.
You don't just refute a scientific theory. You have to replace it with
a fact based alternative. And there's no factual data in creationism.

Q: How can I tell that you haven't been watching the videos I've been
posting links to?

Because I said I don't watch creationist claptrap in another thread?

Post by Bob
A: Because you're wrong.

Only in your bizarro world view.

Post by Bob
But, that's okay with me. You're born to be wrong.

Sez the "elect". Haw Haw.

Post by Bob
"Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe
what is false, in order that all may be condemned who did not believe
the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
(2 Thessalonians 2:11-12)
You got it?

Yeah, you worship a god who created a universe containing millions of
billions galaxies, just so it can make me believe what is false so it
can torture me for all eternity after I die.

That makes perfect sense (to an insane person).

Post by Bob
You're welcome.
<smirk>

And there's that christian love again. You shine as one of your god's
favorites. You and your god happily agree on everything, right?

---
a.a. #2276

Bob

2016-10-26 15:41:12 UTC

Yeah, you worship a god who created a universe containing millions of
billions galaxies, just so it can make me believe what is false so it
can torture me for all eternity after I die.

No. You have no one to blame but yourself for your belief in what is false.

Putting it another way, there is no power in heaven or on earth that can
keep you from entering into sincere prayer with God, which everybody
innately knows how to do, and simply ask, "If there is a God, and if you
hear me right now, could you please somehow let me know that you hear me?"

If you really mean it when you ask that prayer (and everybody knows what
"really mean" really means) there is not a doubt in my mind that God
will answer your prayer. It may take a few days, or a few weeks, or a
month or two, or even a year or two. But if you were sincere, and you
are looking for the answer, and truly expecting to find it, something
will happen and you will know, as surely as you know your name, you will
know that God has heard your prayer and has answered it.

There is nothing stopping you from doing that, except you.

W.T.S., dx6 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-26 16:15:17 UTC

Post by Bob
"Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may
believe what is false, in order that all may be condemned who did
not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
(2 Thessalonians 2:11-12)
You got it?

Yeah, you worship a god who created a universe containing millions of
billions galaxies, just so it can make me believe what is false so it
can torture me for all eternity after I die.

No. You have no one to blame but yourself for your belief in what is false.
Putting it another way, there is no power in heaven or on earth that
can keep you from entering into sincere prayer with God, which
everybody innately knows how to do, and simply ask, "If there is a
God, and if you hear me right now, could you please somehow let me
know that you hear me?"
If you really mean it when you ask that prayer (and everybody knows
what "really mean" really means) there is not a doubt in my mind that
God will answer your prayer. It may take a few days, or a few weeks,
or a month or two, or even a year or two. But if you were sincere, and
you are looking for the answer, and truly expecting to find it,
something will happen and you will know, as surely as you know your
name, you will know that God has heard your prayer and has answered
it.
There is nothing stopping you from doing that, except you.

Bull shit. Educate yourself, "Bob":

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

hypatiab7

2016-10-26 19:02:51 UTC

Yeah, you worship a god who created a universe containing millions of
billions galaxies, just so it can make me believe what is false so it
can torture me for all eternity after I die.

No. You have no one to blame but yourself for your belief in what is false.

Nope, according to your religion, it doesn't matter what he does or doesn't believe. If he's Elect, he still goes to your heaven. Your 'God's' choice,
not yours.

Post by Bob
Putting it another way, there is no power in heaven or on earth that can
keep you from entering into sincere prayer with God, which everybody
innately knows how to do, and simply ask, "If there is a God, and if you
hear me right now, could you please somehow let me know that you hear me?"
If you really mean it when you ask that prayer (and everybody knows what
"really mean" really means) there is not a doubt in my mind that God
will answer your prayer. It may take a few days, or a few weeks, or a
month or two, or even a year or two. But if you were sincere, and you
are looking for the answer, and truly expecting to find it, something
will happen and you will know, as surely as you know your name, you will
know that God has heard your prayer and has answered it.
There is nothing stopping you from doing that, except you.

Intelligence, education and common sense helped a lot.

Bob

2016-10-27 08:55:12 UTC

Post by Bob
There is nothing stopping you from doing that, except you.

Intelligence, education and common sense helped a lot.

What you obviously do not know is that only someone who is chosen by God
to be saved would, at the beginning of his/her new life, want to at
least try to
see if God would answer their prayer, thereby revealing that he really does
exist. That person would want to try contacting God because God had already
put that desire in them before they ever decided to pray to God.

And only the one who has not been chosen by God to be saved would do
pretty much the same as what you're doing right now.

See the difference?

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-27 11:37:25 UTC

Post by Bob
There is nothing stopping you from doing that, except you.

Intelligence, education and common sense helped a lot.

What you obviously do not know is that only someone who is chosen by
God to be saved would, at the beginning of his/her new life, want to
at least try to
see if God would answer their prayer, thereby revealing that he really
does exist. That person would want to try contacting God because God
had already put that desire in them before they ever decided to pray
to God.
And only the one who has not been chosen by God to be saved would do
pretty much the same as what you're doing right now.
See the difference?

Yes, do you? See these links:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:16:10 UTC

Post by Bob
There is nothing stopping you from doing that, except you.

Intelligence, education and common sense helped a lot.

What you obviously do not know is that only someone who is chosen by
God to be saved would, at the beginning of his/her new life, want to
at least try to
see if God would answer their prayer, thereby revealing that he really
does exist. That person would want to try contacting God because God
had already put that desire in them before they ever decided to pray
to God.
And only the one who has not been chosen by God to be saved would do
pretty much the same as what you're doing right now.
See the difference?

We see it all right, right here:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., dx6 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-26 15:35:05 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.

Bull shit.

Post by Bob
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.

Bull shit.

Post by tirebiter
And I could say that more and more sightings of 100 foot tall dinosaurs
are being reported in every large city on earth every day. And just
like your laughable fantasy, I can't back it up because it's not true.
Please present VALID evidence, such as peer reviewed articles from
reputable publications, not creationist videos.
You don't just refute a scientific theory. You have to replace it with
a fact based alternative. And there's no factual data in creationism.

Q: How can I tell that you haven't been watching the videos I've been
posting links to?

Because no one wants to waste good time watching dreamed up nonsense.

Post by Bob
A: Because you're wrong.

No, creationism is nonsense. Evolution is pure truth!

Post by Bob
But, that's okay with me. I'm born to be wrong.

You sure are!

More dreamed up myths and nonsense. Is that all you have in the end?

Post by Bob
You got it?

Yes, you're a jerk and an idiot. Do you really think you're fooling
anyone in this newsgroup? Go to alt.evolution or alt.talk.creationism.

Post by Bob
You're welcome.
<smirk>

<bitch slap>

<https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zascach>

http://youtu.be/DjFgcOId-ZY

<http://tinyurl.com/j9nkey5>

<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6360/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zvyyhxn>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_replication>

<http://tinyurl.com/goxgec9>

<https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-
berlinski/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>

<https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate>

<http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>

<http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/>

<http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>

<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/unintelligent-design.html?
_r=0>

<http://tinyurl.com/h7ubjta>

<http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy>

<http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>

<https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked>

<http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>

<http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>

<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review>

<http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>

<http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/>

<http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>

<http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16>

<http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin>

<http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel>

<http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>

<http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/>

<http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>

<http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html>

<http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>

"Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould>

<http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>

<http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution>

<http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>

<http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys>

<http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>

<http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home>

<http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>

http://youtu.be/F1ibEaIPtMk

<http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falldidit#Falldidit>

<http://tinyurl.com/z4z77ra>

hypatiab7

2016-10-26 18:55:43 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

And I could say that more and more sightings of 100 foot tall dinosaurs
are being reported in every large city on earth every day. And just
like your laughable fantasy, I can't back it up because it's not true.
Please present VALID evidence, such as peer reviewed articles from
reputable publications, not creationist videos.
You don't just refute a scientific theory. You have to replace it with
a fact based alternative. And there's no factual data in creationism.

Q: How can I tell that you haven't been watching the videos I've been
posting links to?
A: Because you're wrong.
But, that's okay with me. You're born to be wrong.
"Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe
what is false, in order that all may be condemned who did not believe
the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
(2 Thessalonians 2:11-12)
You got it?
You're welcome.
<smirk>

You have no way of knowing that you are one of the Elect and you are
scared shitless.

Cloud Hobbit

2016-10-27 01:11:19 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

And I could say that more and more sightings of 100 foot tall dinosaurs
are being reported in every large city on earth every day. And just
like your laughable fantasy, I can't back it up because it's not true.
Please present VALID evidence, such as peer reviewed articles from
reputable publications, not creationist videos.
You don't just refute a scientific theory. You have to replace it with
a fact based alternative. And there's no factual data in creationism.

There's nothing there to get. Prove god exists, ten maybe we can discuss things he supposedly said.

Post by Bob
You're welcome.
<smirk>

Enjoy the smirk because.......
You got nothing.

Jeanne Douglas

2016-10-27 05:18:55 UTC

Post by Cloud Hobbit

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

And I could say that more and more sightings of 100 foot tall dinosaurs
are being reported in every large city on earth every day. And just
like your laughable fantasy, I can't back it up because it's not true.
Please present VALID evidence, such as peer reviewed articles from
reputable publications, not creationist videos.
You don't just refute a scientific theory. You have to replace it with
a fact based alternative. And there's no factual data in creationism.

There's nothing there to get. Prove god exists, ten maybe we can discuss
things he supposedly said.

Post by Bob
You're welcome.
<smirk>

Enjoy the smirk because.......
You got nothing.

None of his nyms seems to understand that people who smirk are
douchebags whose opinions are considered worthless.

--
JD

I'm a "nasty woman" and I vote.

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:13:21 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

And I could say that more and more sightings of 100 foot tall dinosaurs
are being reported in every large city on earth every day. And just
like your laughable fantasy, I can't back it up because it's not true.
Please present VALID evidence, such as peer reviewed articles from
reputable publications, not creationist videos.
You don't just refute a scientific theory. You have to replace it with
a fact based alternative. And there's no factual data in creationism.

This will clear up your "delusion", under oath, on the witness stand:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

hypatiab7

2016-10-26 18:51:56 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

But ... but ... I just saw a huge flock of flying reptiles heading north
for the winter. And some tiny flying reptiles are in a tree outside my
window chirping their feathered heads off. Big dinosaurs from millions of
years ago are fun to watch in documentaries but I really prefer their
birdie descendants - especially on my dinner table.

Post by tirebiter
Please present VALID evidence, such as peer reviewed articles from
reputable publications, not creationist videos.
You don't just refute a scientific theory. You have to replace it with
a fact based alternative. And there's no factual data in creationism.

Post by Bob
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.

Yeah, I can finally agree with one of your batshit crazy statements.
BTW, it's not anything to be proud of.

Post by Bob
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirkle>

Smiler

2016-10-28 01:45:25 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

But ... but ... I just saw a huge flock of flying reptiles heading north
for the winter.

Most fly south for the winter, unless they were Norwegian Blues.

Post by hypatiab7
And some tiny flying reptiles are in a tree outside my
window chirping their feathered heads off. Big dinosaurs from millions
of years ago are fun to watch in documentaries but I really prefer their
birdie descendants - especially on my dinner table.

Post by Bob
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming evolutionists?
Zero.

Yeah, I can finally agree with one of your batshit crazy statements.
BTW, it's not anything to be proud of.

Post by Bob
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirkle>

--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

hypatiab7

2016-10-26 18:26:11 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.
More and more scientists and college professors are publicly
signing the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, and eventually
becoming Creationist in support of Intelligent Design.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/
You know how many are leaving Creationism and becoming
evolutionists?
Zero.
You're losing, chump. Get used to it.
<smirk>

How would you know? More lies from creationist websites?

Tex

2016-10-26 19:11:18 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

About that "Scientific Dissent From Darwinism" the so-called scientists who signed it have generally little expertise in evolutionary biology and therefore are in no position to judge the validity of Darwin. See https://openparachute.wordpress.com/2008/01/18/dissenters-from-darwinism-in-context/ . Also see http://www.sciencemeetsreligion.org/evolution/scientists-evolution.php . To quote from the later link,

"The overwhelming majority of biologists accept evolution. Those who know professionally the evidence for evolution cannot deny it. Scientists agree that the evolutionary origin of animals and plants is a scientific conclusion beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence is compelling and all-encompassing because it comes from all biological disciplines including those that did not exist in Darwin's time. In the second half of the nineteenth century, Darwin and other biologists obtained convincing evidence from a variety of disciplines, which had reached early maturity during the nineteenth century: anatomy, embryology, biogeography, geology, and paleontology. Since Darwin's time, the evidence for evolution has become much stronger and more comprehensive, coming not only from traditional sources but also from recent disciplines such as genetics, biochemistry, ecology, ethology, neurobiology, and molecular biology.

... Because the evidence is so overwhelming, ... evidence for evolution no longer engages the interest of biologists except when explaining evolution to the public or arguing with those who refuse to accept evolution. Although not sought and no longer needed, the evidence for the fact of evolution continues to accumulate."

Tex

Bob

2016-10-26 20:43:17 UTC

Post by Tex

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

If it looks like a biased opinion, and it walks like a biased opinion,
and it quacks like a biased opinion....

I ain't buying it.

Go sell your snake-oil someplace else.

W.T.S., dx6 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-27 03:02:31 UTC

Post by Tex

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

If it looks like a biased opinion, and it walks like a biased opinion,
and it quacks like a biased opinion....
I ain't buying it.
Go sell your snake-oil someplace else.

Here's a sure cure for your bull shit, "Bob":

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

Enjoy creationists and ID nuts on the witness stand!!!

Beam Me Up Scotty

2016-10-27 03:12:19 UTC

Post by Bob
If it looks like a biased opinion, and it walks like a biased opinion,
and it quacks like a biased opinion....

....then somewhere there's a Liberal giving you their opinion.

--
That's Karma
http://usdebtclock.org/#

Hillary wants FREE COLLEGE for everyone... so what will they do when
they graduate into Hillary's economy and they can't get a job to use
that education and the regulations prevent them from starting their own
business. Looks like they will be the most educated generation of
*FOOD* *STAMP* recipients in history.

Bob

2016-10-27 08:58:05 UTC

Post by Beam Me Up Scotty

Post by Bob
If it looks like a biased opinion, and it walks like a biased opinion,
and it quacks like a biased opinion....

....then somewhere there's a Liberal giving you their opinion.

Good one!
+1

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-27 11:38:51 UTC

Booby <***@null.null> wrote in news:nusfio$ggg$***@gioia.aioe.org:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:21:02 UTC

Post by Beam Me Up Scotty

Post by Bob
If it looks like a biased opinion, and it walks like a biased opinion,
and it quacks like a biased opinion....

....then somewhere there's a Liberal giving you their opinion.

Good one!

Here's a better one:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:19:57 UTC

Post by Beam Me Up Scotty

Post by Bob
If it looks like a biased opinion, and it walks like a biased opinion,
and it quacks like a biased opinion....

....then somewhere there's a Liberal giving you their opinion.

Here's a conservative opinion, under oath, on the witness stand:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:18:45 UTC

Post by Tex

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

If it looks like a biased opinion, and it walks like a biased opinion,
and it quacks like a biased opinion....
I ain't buying it.
Go sell your snake-oil someplace else.

Here's a creationist opinion, under oath, on the witness stand:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

Andrew

2016-10-26 21:39:25 UTC

"Scientists agree that the evolutionary origin of animals and
plants is a scientific conclusion beyond reasonable doubt."

Can ~any~ scientist explain the prime origin
of any living thing by Darwinian processes?

They cannot. Then explain why you fell for it.

"We must concede that there are presently no
detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution
of any biochemical or cellular system, only a
variety of wishful speculations."
~ Franklin M. Harold,
Professor Emeritus
Biochemistry

W.T.S., dx6 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-27 03:18:20 UTC

"Scientists agree that the evolutionary origin of animals and
plants is a scientific conclusion beyond reasonable doubt."

Here's a lot more proof Evolution is truth, and creationism is a lie:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

Enjoy the specticle of creationists and ID freaks in court,
confessing that ID and creationism are lies and con games!

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:23:04 UTC

"Scientists agree that the evolutionary origin of animals and
plants is a scientific conclusion beyond reasonable doubt."

Can ~any~ scientist explain the prime origin
of any living thing by Darwinian processes?

Yes, easily.

Post by Andrew
They cannot. Then explain why you fell for it.

Bull shit.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:00:00 UTC

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.

Really??? Observe:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

Books advocating creationism and ID are too stiff to be used as toilet
paper.

Christopher A. Lee

2016-10-28 16:06:59 UTC

Post by W.T.S., dx6 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:00:00 -0500, "W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden

Post by tirebiter
After all, it's one of the most strongly supported scientific
theories in existence.

Not for long. It's being systematically refuted every day.

What a thoroughly stupid, in-your-face liar.

Post by W.T.S., dx6 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>
<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>
Books advocating creationism and ID are too stiff to be used as toilet
paper.

You have to be remarkably stupid as well as ignorant and uneducated,
to say what he just did.

And his mind-bogglingly transparent lie is an illustration of that.

Why does mainstream America put up with this, and why doesn't it treat
them for what they are, the way the rest of the world does apart from
a few Islamic hell-holes?

John Locke

2016-10-26 17:35:58 UTC

Post by Bob
http://youtu.be/6dUcFDZxZRo

...and once again from the Encyclopedia of Loons:
http://americanloons.blogspot.com/search?q=John+MacArthur

"John MacArthur is an insane fundamentalist Baptist, hyper-Calvinist
and dispensationalist endtimes preacher, known for leading the Grace
Community Church, for his radio program Grace to You, as author of
several fundamentalist tracts, and for being on the Council of
Reference for the British creationist organization Truth in Science
(though he is American), which as the name implies is vigorously
opposed to both truth and science. Of evolution, e.g. in his book The
Battle For the Beginning, MacArthur has said that that Christians
ought to expose such lies for what they are and oppose them
vigorously."

hypatiab7

2016-10-26 18:23:37 UTC

Post by Bob
http://youtu.be/6dUcFDZxZRo

No one believes you or your creationist links. (Trolls don't count).

Bob

2016-10-26 18:33:23 UTC

Post by Bob
http://youtu.be/6dUcFDZxZRo

No one who's been rejected by God and predestined for everlasting
punishment believes you or your creationist links. (Trolls don't
count).

I fixed your post for you.

You're welcome.

<smirk>

raven1

2016-10-26 18:41:51 UTC

Post by Bob
http://youtu.be/6dUcFDZxZRo

No one who's been rejected by God and predestined for everlasting
punishment believes you or your creationist links. (Trolls don't
count).

I fixed your post for you.
You're welcome.
<smirk>

As I pointed out elsewhere, even if one were to grant for the sake of
argument that God exists, and you're among the elect, you'd still be
stupidly wrong about evolution, and the Creationists you cite would
still be con artists looking to fool ignorant rubes like you.

hypatiab7

2016-10-26 19:13:04 UTC

Post by Bob
http://youtu.be/6dUcFDZxZRo

No one who's been rejected by God and predestined for everlasting
punishment believes you or your creationist links. (Trolls don't
count).

I fixed your post for you.
You're welcome.
<smirkles>

Nope. You ran it through the mud puddle of your mind and ruined it.
It also makes no sense, since your forgot to cut off the part after
your changes.

W.T.S., 089 The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-27 02:58:42 UTC

Boob <***@Numb.Nuts> Farted in news:nuqstf$1m59$***@gioia.aioe.org:

Here's a fix for all of your posts, "Bob":

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

Enjoy creationists and ID freaks admiting creationism and ID are both
bull shit, under oath, and on the witness stand!!!

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 16:25:05 UTC

Post by Bob
http://youtu.be/6dUcFDZxZRo

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

W.T.S., cde3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

2016-10-28 15:57:17 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch-creationist-eat-shit-and-die/

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>

<http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>

Smiler

2016-10-28 19:55:11 UTC

Post by Bob
http://youtu.be/6dUcFDZxZRo

When will you morons learn that, even if Darwin was as mad as a hatter and/
or that he was a murdering child rapist, it would make no difference to
the truth and validity of the ToE.

--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

Olrik

2016-10-29 04:45:51 UTC

Post by Smiler

Post by Bob
http://youtu.be/6dUcFDZxZRo

When will you morons learn that, even if Darwin was as mad as a hatter and/
or that he was a murdering child rapist, it would make no difference to
the truth and validity of the ToE.

The defectives like to personalize science. It often happens with
Newton, Darwin but especially Einstein. They don't like geniuses, I
guess, as they cast a shadow upon their pure insignificance...

(It's just my theory, mind you...) ;-)

--
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

Smiler

2016-10-29 17:34:57 UTC