Discussion:
Largest Collection of Hominid Fossils Ever Found
Add Reply
hypatiab7
2017-09-07 03:03:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.

https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
John Locke
2017-09-07 03:41:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 20:03:50 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
...well worth posting. This was truly a remarkable find. I get
claustrophobic just thinking about the tiny cave spaces Alia Gurtov
had to crawl through to get to the fossils. Gutsy lady.
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-07 14:52:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by John Locke
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 20:03:50 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
...well worth posting. This was truly a remarkable find. I get
claustrophobic just thinking about the tiny cave spaces Alia Gurtov
had to crawl through to get to the fossils. Gutsy lady.
Archeology and paleontology are definitely not professions for the claustrophobic.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Malte Runz
2017-09-07 21:00:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 09:52:33 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas"
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by John Locke
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 20:03:50 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
...well worth posting. This was truly a remarkable find. I get
claustrophobic just thinking about the tiny cave spaces Alia Gurtov
had to crawl through to get to the fossils. Gutsy lady.
Archeology and paleontology are definitely not professions for the claustrophobic.
I believe it was National Geographic that had an hour long program
about it. I love this stuff!
--
Malte Runz
hypatiab7
2017-09-09 07:35:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 09:52:33 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas"
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by John Locke
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 20:03:50 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
...well worth posting. This was truly a remarkable find. I get
claustrophobic just thinking about the tiny cave spaces Alia Gurtov
had to crawl through to get to the fossils. Gutsy lady.
Archeology and paleontology are definitely not professions for the claustrophobic.
I believe it was National Geographic that had an hour long program
about it. I love this stuff!
The video has been available for awhile now. I think I got mine from the
PBS catalogue.
A***@yahoo.com
2017-09-07 04:18:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
John Locke
2017-09-07 05:23:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
...and just how exactly did you manage to arrive at such a
perspicacious analysis ?? You definitely need to write up
your fluff hypothesis and submit it for peer review.
hypatiab7
2017-09-07 13:23:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by John Locke
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
...and just how exactly did you manage to arrive at such a
perspicacious analysis ?? You definitely need to write up
your fluff hypothesis and submit it for peer review.
He didn't. He's just shooting off his mouth trying to get us
to change the subject to something he can handle.
Malte Runz
2017-09-07 21:01:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 06:23:18 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
Post by John Locke
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
...and just how exactly did you manage to arrive at such a
perspicacious analysis ?? You definitely need to write up
your fluff hypothesis and submit it for peer review.
He didn't. He's just shooting off his mouth trying to get us
to change the subject to something he can handle.
'You're so emotional! Ook ook!!!!'?
--
Malte Runz
David Canzi
2017-09-08 22:52:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by John Locke
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
...and just how exactly did you manage to arrive at such a
perspicacious analysis ?? You definitely need to write up
your fluff hypothesis and submit it for peer review.
He didn't. He's just shooting off his mouth trying to get us
to change the subject to something he can handle.
He was most likely trying to change the subject to himself.
And, reading the thread, I see he has mostly succeeded.
--
David Canzi | Science is the signal; religion is the noise.
hypatiab7
2017-09-07 08:18:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
A***@yahoo.com
2017-09-07 13:19:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
Davej
2017-09-07 17:21:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
The truth hurts the deliberately ignorant. And creationists
like John Monkeyboi always consider their religion more
important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
Bible fraud keeps on going. What chapter of the Bible describes
ape-like men? What chapter of the Bible explains why 99% of known
species are now extinct? I don't remember Noah admitting that he
failed miserably.
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-08 07:44:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Davej
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
The truth hurts the deliberately ignorant. And creationists
like John Monkeyboi always consider their religion more
important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
What "evolution fraud"? You've been asked many times and never posted anything but a list of things that were never frauds or, if they were fraudulent, were not committed by evolution biologists. So what "evolution fraud"?
Post by Davej
Bible fraud keeps on going. What chapter of the Bible describes
ape-like men? What chapter of the Bible explains why 99% of known
species are now extinct? I don't remember Noah admitting that he
failed miserably.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Malte Runz
2017-09-07 22:12:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils? Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.

You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a lost
battle. Evolution is a fact. The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna. Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all the
time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.

And all you do is calling them frauds. Let's get into the proper mood
for the occasion.

--
Malte Runz
Andrew
2017-09-09 21:19:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.

"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist

See? That's how it's done.

Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.

"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.

If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.

He is the awesome One.

Our Maker.

All glory to Him.


Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all the
time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
hypatiab7
2017-09-10 01:16:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all the
time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution, so
he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything new.
A***@yahoo.com
2017-09-10 01:18:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all the
time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution, so
he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything new.
You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.
Atlatl Axolotl
2017-09-10 02:01:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all the
time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution, so
he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything new.
.
.> You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.

."You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious."

Ah! A mind reader! Exactly the person I need!!

Tell me -- where are my car keys?

(and thanks in advance)


Atlatl Axolotl
A***@yahoo.com
2017-09-10 02:08:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all the
time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution, so
he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything new.
.
.> You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.
."You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious."
Ah! A mind reader! Exactly the person I need!!
Tell me -- where are my car keys?
(and thanks in advance)
Atlatl Axolotl
If you do not know where your car keys are I suggest praying. Otherwise you're asking me to be frivolous with God.
Kevrob
2017-09-13 18:52:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all the
time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution, so
he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything new.
.
.> You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.
."You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious."
Ah! A mind reader! Exactly the person I need!!
Tell me -- where are my car keys?
(and thanks in advance)
Atlatl Axolotl
If you do not know where your car keys are I suggest praying. Otherwise you're asking me to be frivolous with God.
But remember, if you ask St Anthony for help, the hardcore
protestants will accuse you of heretical idolatry. :)

Kevin R
A***@yahoo.com
2017-09-13 19:42:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all the
time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution, so
he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything new.
.
.> You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.
."You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious."
Ah! A mind reader! Exactly the person I need!!
Tell me -- where are my car keys?
(and thanks in advance)
Atlatl Axolotl
If you do not know where your car keys are I suggest praying. Otherwise you're asking me to be frivolous with God.
But remember, if you ask St Anthony for help, the hardcore
protestants will accuse you of heretical idolatry. :)
Kevin R
St Anthony is dead and the Bible tells us not to talk to familiar spirits. They are really demons pretending to be someone they are not.
%
2017-09-13 19:44:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
.

the tippy toe is among us
Kevrob
2017-09-13 20:12:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by Kevrob
But remember, if you ask St Anthony for help, the hardcore
protestants will accuse you of heretical idolatry. :)
Kevin R
St Anthony is dead and the Bible tells us not to talk to familiar spirits. They are really demons pretending to be someone they are not.
You really are a humorless crank, aren't you?

Predictable, too.

You know the Catholics believe in intercessory prayer. But, even among
your fellow theists, only your particular brand of woo-woo will do.
You make pronouncements here as if you were a pope sitting "ex cathedra."
Do you really think you are that special?

As one of your protestant heroes once said....

".... think it possible you may be mistaken."*

Kevin R

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Cromwell

A figure of mixed worth. A proto-republican, but not a
"separation of church and state" man by any means, and
since I'm an Irish-descended American, raised Catholic,
his name was practically a swear word around my house
in my youth. (penal laws, massacres at Drogheda, Wexford etc.)
Christopher A. Lee
2017-09-13 20:52:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by Kevrob
But remember, if you ask St Anthony for help, the hardcore
protestants will accuse you of heretical idolatry. :)
Kevin R
St Anthony is dead and the Bible tells us not to talk to familiar spirits. They are really demons pretending to be someone they are not.
You really are a humorless crank, aren't you?
Predictable, too.
You know the Catholics believe in intercessory prayer. But, even among
your fellow theists, only your particular brand of woo-woo will do.
You make pronouncements here as if you were a pope sitting "ex cathedra."
Do you really think you are that special?
As one of your protestant heroes once said....
".... think it possible you may be mistaken."*
Kevin R
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Cromwell
A figure of mixed worth. A proto-republican, but not a
"separation of church and state" man by any means, and
since I'm an Irish-descended American, raised Catholic,
his name was practically a swear word around my house
in my youth. (penal laws, massacres at Drogheda, Wexford etc.)
His followers were Puritans, and he was one by the time of the civil
war.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Cromwell#Early_years

by the end of the 1630s Cromwell had returned to the ranks of
acknowledged gentry. He had become a committed Puritan and had
established important family links to leading families in London and
Essex.[25]
Andrew
2017-09-10 06:27:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Tell me -- where are my car keys?
Does Alzheimer's run in your family?

Set your affairs in order before it is
too late.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
(and thanks in advance)
No problem.
Smiler
2017-09-10 23:34:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone
who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-
human-evolutionary-tree
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has
it down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent
about the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But
folks like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby
exposing your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that
adorn our text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of
their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the
evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over again? Are they simply the bones of
dwarfed chimps with crouzon syndrome? Give me something...
anything! And prepare to have it shoved, unconditionally,
unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and there is nothing you can do
to change it. It is painfully obvious and logical that we share
ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all
the time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove
evolution, so he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything
new.
.
.> You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.
."You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious."
Ah! A mind reader! Exactly the person I need!!
Tell me -- where are my car keys?
(and thanks in advance)
No need for mind reading. They're where you last left them. :)
--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-11 09:55:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone
who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-
human-evolutionary-tree
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has
it down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent
about the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But
folks like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby
exposing your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that
adorn our text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of
their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the
evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over again? Are they simply the bones of
dwarfed chimps with crouzon syndrome? Give me something...
anything! And prepare to have it shoved, unconditionally,
unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and there is nothing you can do
to change it. It is painfully obvious and logical that we share
ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all
the time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove
evolution, so he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything
new.
.
.> You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.
."You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious."
Ah! A mind reader! Exactly the person I need!!
Tell me -- where are my car keys?
(and thanks in advance)
No need for mind reading. They're where you last left them. :)
Mine go right on the doorknob when I walk in the door. I may not remember where other things are, but I always know where my keys are.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Kevrob
2017-09-13 18:56:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone
who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-
human-evolutionary-tree
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is
-->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has
it down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent
about the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But
folks like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby
exposing your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your
worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record
persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that
adorn our text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of
their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the
evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over again? Are they simply the bones of
dwarfed chimps with crouzon syndrome? Give me something...
anything! And prepare to have it shoved, unconditionally,
unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and there is nothing you can do
to change it. It is painfully obvious and logical that we share
ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all
the time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove
evolution, so he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything
new.
.
.> You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.
."You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious."
Ah! A mind reader! Exactly the person I need!!
Tell me -- where are my car keys?
(and thanks in advance)
No need for mind reading. They're where you last left them. :)
Mine go right on the doorknob when I walk in the door. I may not remember where other things are, but I always know where my keys are.
"We have a bowl." - Leonard Hofstader

Kevin R
Kevrob
2017-09-13 18:58:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
"We have a bowl." - Leonard Hofstader
Correction: Sheldon Cooper!

Kevin R
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-13 20:37:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone
who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-
human-evolutionary-tree
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is
-->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has
it down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent
about the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But
folks like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby
exposing your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your
worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record
persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that
adorn our text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of
their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the
evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over again? Are they simply the bones of
dwarfed chimps with crouzon syndrome? Give me something...
anything! And prepare to have it shoved, unconditionally,
unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and there is nothing you can do
to change it. It is painfully obvious and logical that we share
ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all
the time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever
existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't
address it.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove
evolution, so he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything
new.
.
.> You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.
."You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious."
Ah! A mind reader! Exactly the person I need!!
Tell me -- where are my car keys?
(and thanks in advance)
No need for mind reading. They're where you last left them. :)
Mine go right on the doorknob when I walk in the door. I may not remember where other things are, but I always know where my keys are.
"We have a bowl." - Leonard Hofstader
That works, too. Or a hook on the wall next to the door.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Malte Runz
2017-09-10 03:25:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. ...
Like you, Andrew, has never been able to point to anything scientific
to back up your wild claims.
... You don't address it.
There is nothing to address, once the quote mines have been disarmed,
and the srawmen burned.

(snip)
--
Malte Runz
A***@yahoo.com
2017-09-10 03:46:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. ...
Like you, Andrew, has never been able to point to anything scientific
to back up your wild claims.
... You don't address it.
There is nothing to address, once the quote mines have been disarmed,
and the srawmen burned.
(snip)
--
Malte Runz
You're always accusing people of quote mining when no such quote mining takes place.
Malte Runz
2017-09-10 10:33:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by Malte Runz
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. ...
Like you, Andrew, has never been able to point to anything scientific
to back up your wild claims.
... You don't address it.
There is nothing to address, once the quote mines have been disarmed,
and the srawmen burned.
(snip)
--
Malte Runz
You're always accusing people of quote mining when no such quote mining takes place.
No? Just look at Andrews reply to me a few posts back. He quotes Gould
and Curnoe, as if they were supporting his idea, that human evolution
is not supported by paleontology. Andrew knows that he is dishonest,
just like you know you're lying about the same topic.

I asked you to explain why those fossils in the cave is 'evolution
fraud', but you can't, can you? You simply cannot put a rational
argument together and present it. All you can say 'it's fraud', and
Andrew will join you and call it 'fantasy'. You guys have nothing.
--
Malte Runz
Don Martin
2017-09-10 11:47:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 12:33:08 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by Malte Runz
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. ...
Like you, Andrew, has never been able to point to anything scientific
to back up your wild claims.
... You don't address it.
There is nothing to address, once the quote mines have been disarmed,
and the srawmen burned.
(snip)
--
Malte Runz
You're always accusing people of quote mining when no such quote mining takes place.
No? Just look at Andrews reply to me a few posts back. He quotes Gould
and Curnoe, as if they were supporting his idea, that human evolution
is not supported by paleontology. Andrew knows that he is dishonest,
just like you know you're lying about the same topic.
I asked you to explain why those fossils in the cave is 'evolution
fraud', but you can't, can you? You simply cannot put a rational
argument together and present it. All you can say 'it's fraud', and
Andrew will join you and call it 'fantasy'. You guys have nothing.
You must admit, though, that they are always willing to share it.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Malte Runz
2017-09-10 15:21:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 07:47:10 -0400, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 12:33:08 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by Malte Runz
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. ...
Like you, Andrew, has never been able to point to anything scientific
to back up your wild claims.
... You don't address it.
There is nothing to address, once the quote mines have been disarmed,
and the srawmen burned.
(snip)
--
Malte Runz
You're always accusing people of quote mining when no such quote mining takes place.
No? Just look at Andrews reply to me a few posts back. He quotes Gould
and Curnoe, as if they were supporting his idea, that human evolution
is not supported by paleontology. Andrew knows that he is dishonest,
just like you know you're lying about the same topic.
I asked you to explain why those fossils in the cave is 'evolution
fraud', but you can't, can you? You simply cannot put a rational
argument together and present it. All you can say 'it's fraud', and
Andrew will join you and call it 'fantasy'. You guys have nothing.
You must admit, though, that they are always willing to share it.
Sure... Thanks for nothing.
--
Malte Runz
Don Martin
2017-09-10 15:56:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 17:21:24 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by Malte Runz
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 07:47:10 -0400, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 12:33:08 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by Malte Runz
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. ...
Like you, Andrew, has never been able to point to anything scientific
to back up your wild claims.
... You don't address it.
There is nothing to address, once the quote mines have been disarmed,
and the srawmen burned.
(snip)
--
Malte Runz
You're always accusing people of quote mining when no such quote mining takes place.
No? Just look at Andrews reply to me a few posts back. He quotes Gould
and Curnoe, as if they were supporting his idea, that human evolution
is not supported by paleontology. Andrew knows that he is dishonest,
just like you know you're lying about the same topic.
I asked you to explain why those fossils in the cave is 'evolution
fraud', but you can't, can you? You simply cannot put a rational
argument together and present it. All you can say 'it's fraud', and
Andrew will join you and call it 'fantasy'. You guys have nothing.
You must admit, though, that they are always willing to share it.
Sure... Thanks for nothing.
There you go--looking a gift horse in the gums.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Andrew
2017-09-13 10:28:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
Just look at Andrews reply to me a few posts back. He quotes Gould
and Curnoe, as if they were supporting his idea, that human evolution
is not supported by paleontology.
No, I specifically cited them as evolutionists.
Malte Runz
2017-09-13 20:30:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Just look at Andrews reply to me a few posts back. He quotes Gould
and Curnoe, as if they were supporting his idea, that human evolution
is not supported by paleontology.
No, I specifically cited them as evolutionists.
Then explain why you quoted the two gentlemen. What points were you
trying to make?
--
Malte Runz
Andrew
2017-09-13 22:42:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Just look at Andrews reply to me a few posts back. He quotes Gould
and Curnoe, as if they were supporting his idea, that human evolution
is not supported by paleontology.
No, I specifically cited them as evolutionists.
Then explain why you quoted the two gentlemen. What points were you
trying to make?
Because I am interested in the truth, and what they said was the truth.

"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist

See? That's how they do it.

Here's the trade secret of paleontology for you.

"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-13 23:41:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Just look at Andrews reply to me a few posts back. He quotes Gould
and Curnoe, as if they were supporting his idea, that human evolution
is not supported by paleontology.
No, I specifically cited them as evolutionists.
There's no such thing as an "evolutionist".
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Moses
2017-09-14 03:46:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:41:56 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas"
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Just look at Andrews reply to me a few posts back. He quotes Gould
and Curnoe, as if they were supporting his idea, that human evolution
is not supported by paleontology.
No, I specifically cited them as evolutionists.
There's no such thing as an "evolutionist".
Really? Can you explain?
Andrew
2017-09-10 06:28:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. ...
Like you, Andrew, has never been able to point to anything scientific
to back up your wild claims.
A fantasized interpretation of bones found in a cave is -->not science.
Post by Malte Runz
... You don't address it.
There is nothing to address, once the quote mines have been disarmed,
and the srawmen burned.
The quotes were from evolutionists yet they expose your deception.
Malte Runz
2017-09-10 10:56:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 02:28:53 -0400, "Andrew"
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. ...
Like you, Andrew, has never been able to point to anything scientific
to back up your wild claims.
A fantasized interpretation of bones found in a cave is -->not science.
But you can't explain why you think those bones do not tell the story
the paleontologists say they do. You have one word only.
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
... You don't address it.
There is nothing to address, once the quote mines have been disarmed,
and the srawmen burned.
The quotes were from evolutionists yet they expose your deception.
We've been over Gould's quote many times before, and you know the
context. You know that he was a staunch supporter of evolution, and
had nothing but disrespect for creationists like you and Ass. Do I
really need to quote him saying it?

Below is a transcript of an interview Curnoe gave to Australian TV a
while back. I found it when I was, unsuccessfully, searching for the
context of the quote you posted. But maybe you can provide it... Who
am I kidding!

http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2015/s4408704.htm
Read it and tell me whether or not you think, that Curnoe believes in
human evolution from 'primitive hominid' to modern man, and that the
fossil evidence leads to no other conclusion.
--
Malte Runz
hypatiab7
2017-09-10 13:05:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Every new discovery, like the one at hand, confirms
Post by Malte Runz
it. New hypotheses, based on that knowledge, are confirmed all the
time. The results of all the hard work are tangible, and have
benefited humanity for centuries.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
Where? Please cite it.
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution, so
he starts singing hosannas. Nothing new. Never anything new.
You're very fearful and now are becoming delirious.
My goodness, John Monkeyboi, you are sounding angry and very emotional.
Where is your evidence that your god ever existed? Everyone keeps
asking and you never give an answer. Remember neither your Bible nor
faith are acceptable answers as far as atheists are concerned.
Attila
2017-09-10 17:39:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 18:18:15 -0700 (PDT), ***@yahoo.com in
alt.atheism with message-id
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
He's provided plenty of evidence and you just ignore it. You don't address it.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
god.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Andrew
2017-09-13 10:21:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any god.
That's because you have been searching for 'god'.

But the truth is that, "there is no 'god'."

You ~should have~ been searching for -->God.
Attila
2017-09-13 11:11:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any god.
That's because you have been searching for 'god'.
But the truth is that, "there is no 'god'."
You ~should have~ been searching for -->God.
Either way, no evidence.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Christopher A. Lee
2017-09-13 12:50:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Attila
Post by Andrew
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any god.
That's because you have been searching for 'god'.
But the truth is that, "there is no 'god'."
You ~should have~ been searching for -->God.
Either way, no evidence.
None of these mentally ill retards have ever explained why we should
search for something from somebody else's religious mythology.

All they do, is rudely and stupidly talk _at_ us as if it were a fact.

Which begs the question that they always cop out of answering - and
wouldn't even be asked if they kept their unsolicited bullshit where
it belongs.
Attila
2017-09-13 18:36:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:50:49 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Attila
Post by Andrew
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any god.
That's because you have been searching for 'god'.
But the truth is that, "there is no 'god'."
You ~should have~ been searching for -->God.
Either way, no evidence.
None of these mentally ill retards have ever explained why we should
search for something from somebody else's religious mythology.
All they do, is rudely and stupidly talk _at_ us as if it were a fact.
Which begs the question that they always cop out of answering - and
wouldn't even be asked if they kept their unsolicited bullshit where
it belongs.
That is really the central issue. What someone believes is their
personal business until they try to convince someone else to believe
the same way. Yet most superstitions demand their believers do
exactly that - try to convince everyone else to share that belief.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Siri Cruise
2017-09-13 18:48:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Attila
the same way. Yet most superstitions demand their believers do
exactly that - try to convince everyone else to share that belief.
Welcome to America. In a public place I am free to try to convince you of
anything I want. You don't have to listen, but you can't stop me.


By the way if you don't eat fifty almonds a day, thetans will invade your body.
Coughing up all those almond skins keeps the thetans out. L Ron Hubbard luvs you.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
Free the Amos Yee one. This post / \
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha. insults Islam. Mohammed
Attila
2017-09-13 20:09:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:48:14 -0700, Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Attila
the same way. Yet most superstitions demand their believers do
exactly that - try to convince everyone else to share that belief.
Welcome to America. In a public place I am free to try to convince you of
anything I want. You don't have to listen, but you can't stop me.
Unfortunately.
Post by Siri Cruise
By the way if you don't eat fifty almonds a day, thetans will invade your body.
Coughing up all those almond skins keeps the thetans out. L Ron Hubbard luvs you.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Malte Runz
2017-09-13 21:40:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Attila
the same way. Yet most superstitions demand their believers do
exactly that - try to convince everyone else to share that belief.
Welcome to America. In a public place I am free to try to convince you of
anything I want. You don't have to listen, but you can't stop me.
What if I asked you, respectfully, to stop trying? What if you
refused, and continued? At some point it would be considered
harassment, and I'd call the cops.

(snip)
--
Malte Runz
Siri Cruise
2017-09-13 23:31:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Attila
the same way. Yet most superstitions demand their believers do
exactly that - try to convince everyone else to share that belief.
Welcome to America. In a public place I am free to try to convince you of
anything I want. You don't have to listen, but you can't stop me.
What if I asked you, respectfully, to stop trying? What if you
refused, and continued? At some point it would be considered
harassment, and I'd call the cops.
(snip)
And they would tell you in a public place they can't do anything about me
talking.

Bring up stalking, but stalking isn't talking.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
Free the Amos Yee one. This post / \
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha. insults Islam. Mohammed
Don Martin
2017-09-14 02:08:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Siri Cruise
Welcome to America. In a public place I am free to try to convince you of
anything I want. You don't have to listen, but you can't stop me.
The credo of every fucking troll who shows up here. Apparently you
have no more shame than they do.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Christopher A. Lee
2017-09-14 06:40:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:08:34 -0400, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
Post by Siri Cruise
Welcome to America. In a public place I am free to try to convince you of
anything I want. You don't have to listen, but you can't stop me.
The credo of every fucking troll who shows up here. Apparently you
have no more shame than they do.
These liars imagine the First Amendment entitles them to troll - but
they're too stupid to understand that it allows us to use our own
freedom of speech to tell them to fuck off.
Siri Cruise
2017-09-14 07:34:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
Post by Siri Cruise
Welcome to America. In a public place I am free to try to convince you of
anything I want. You don't have to listen, but you can't stop me.
The credo of every fucking troll who shows up here. Apparently you
have no more shame than they do.
People don't need your permission to use their freedom. That's the point of the
'free' of freedom.

But seriously, dude, eat the almonds; cough up the skins. There's no demonic
possession worse than a body thetan infestation. L Ron Hubbard luvs you.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
Free the Amos Yee one. This post / \
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha. insults Islam. Mohammed
Attila
2017-09-14 08:41:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:34:24 -0700, Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Don Martin
Post by Siri Cruise
Welcome to America. In a public place I am free to try to convince you of
anything I want. You don't have to listen, but you can't stop me.
The credo of every fucking troll who shows up here. Apparently you
have no more shame than they do.
People don't need your permission to use their freedom. That's the point of the
'free' of freedom.
But seriously, dude, eat the almonds; cough up the skins. There's no demonic
possession worse than a body thetan infestation. L Ron Hubbard luvs you.
One thing that can be done is to loudly call upon demons to come down
and pursue the perpetrator with boils and the itch.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Attila
2017-09-14 08:39:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:08:34 -0400, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
Post by Siri Cruise
Welcome to America. In a public place I am free to try to convince you of
anything I want. You don't have to listen, but you can't stop me.
The credo of every fucking troll who shows up here. Apparently you
have no more shame than they do.
Those nut cases are certain that what they do is much more important
than minor things like laws, being obnoxious, or anything else. They
are doing what their god wants them to do, and basically that makes
them more dangerous than any simple terrorist. Thy are capable of
doing anything.

I am amused by the uproar that frequently arises when someone point
out how christians can be terrorists just like those who are operating
in Syria or any other country.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Andrew
2017-09-10 06:28:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
There is no 'god' but there is plenty of evidence for the awesome God.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution,
"Goo to you" is disproved because it has no scientifically observed mechanism.

It has ~only a fantasized~ mechanism.

Furthermore, you have no "goo" to begin with.
Post by hypatiab7
so he starts singing hosannas.
Hosanna, glory to our awesome Creator.
Post by hypatiab7
Nothing new. Never anything new.
Atlatl Axolotl
2017-09-10 07:07:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
He is the awesome One.
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
There is no 'god' but there is plenty of evidence for the awesome God.
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution,
"Goo to you" is disproved because it has no scientifically observed mechanism.
Lightning also currently has no scientifically observed mechanism.

It would be as foolish to believe in Thor just because science has
yet to figure that out as it would be to believe in YHWH because
science has yet to figure out abiogenesis.

Current lack of an explanation and being "disproved" are two
entirely different things. Lightning has hardly been "disproved".

And by the way, since you bring up "goo", why don't
you elaborate on us what you think "goo" is.

I ask because I'm at the moment finishing up reading my third book on
current research into the field, so it would be most fascinating, I'm sure,
to compare what you think the field is about to what the
actual scientists involved are working on..

So tell us -- what is this "goo" of yours:








AtlAxo
Post by Andrew
It has ~only a fantasized~ mechanism.
Furthermore, you have no "goo" to begin with.
Post by hypatiab7
so he starts singing hosannas.
Hosanna, glory to our awesome Creator.
Post by hypatiab7
Nothing new. Never anything new.
hypatiab7
2017-09-10 13:48:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. But folks
like you who believe fantasy just swallow it all up. Thereby exposing
your gullibility.
"Nobody looks at a fossil with a completely open mind. I suppose to
some extent also we see what we think. So you come to a fossil and
you have an idea about the way you think human evolution worked,
and the first thing you do is try and fit that fossil into your worldview."
~ Darren Curnoe, paleoanthropologist
See? That's how it's done.
Here's a little trade secret of paleontology for you.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as
the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our
text- books have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the
rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
~ Stephen Jay Gould, paleontologist
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. Now, do you want to discuss those footprints down in Texas?
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
Creationism is religion, not science.
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
If you believe in "goo to you" evolution, you are under deception.
Post by Malte Runz
The genes are out of the bottle, and
there is nothing you can do to change it. It is painfully obvious and
logical that we share ancestry with apes, monkeys and the rest of the
flora and fauna.
Creationists don't want to be part of everything. They must be king of the hill.
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Only in the sense that we share a common Creator.
You have yet to provide evidence that your so-called creator ever existed.
The Bible and faith are not acceotablr answers.
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
He is the awesome One.
The awesome what? And while your at it, would you mind describing your god?
Or don't you even know what you're worshipping?
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Our Maker.
All glory to Him.
It only has one sex? Some god. Maybe it doesn't have any sex at all. After all, you say it's always existed, no mom and dad. Why would it even need sex. Maybe
it invented it? Tsk.
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
There is no 'god' but there is plenty of evidence for the awesome God.
But you and the other theist trolls can't present it. You guys don't even know
what your worshipping. You just take the word of other people with no proof or evidence at all.
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
so he blurts whatever comes into his head. He can't disprove evolution,
"Goo to you" is disproved because it has no scientifically observed mechanism.
It has ~only a fantasized~ mechanism.
Furthermore, you have no "goo" to begin with.
Post by hypatiab7
so he starts singing hosannas.
Hosanna, glory to our awesome Creator.
Post by hypatiab7
Nothing new. Never anything new.
Religion is human made. It is changed by humans and controlled by humans.
The humans who control the religion also control the worshippers.
Don Martin
2017-09-10 14:45:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago.
And when bishops recognize a fraud, they do their best to make sure
nobody else does. Some prayer is involved as well, I believe.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Malte Runz
2017-09-10 16:16:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Post by hypatiab7
... Now, do you want to discuss those footprints down in Texas?
Loading Image...
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm

It's like they're not even trying.

(snip)
--
Malte Runz
Ted
2017-09-10 16:26:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 18:16:05 +0200, Malte Runz
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Post by hypatiab7
... Now, do you want to discuss those footprints down in Texas?
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/Delk.jpg
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm
It's like they're not even trying.
(snip)
hypatiab7
2017-09-11 05:21:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Sorry about the mixup, but the creationists do keep bringing that up.
Post by Don Martin
Post by hypatiab7
... Now, do you want to discuss those footprints down in Texas?
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/Delk.jpg
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm
It's like they're not even trying.
(snip)
--
Malte Runz
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-11 12:04:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Sorry about the mixup, but the creationists do keep bringing that up.
It wasn't scientists who perpetrated the Piltdown fraud. It was scientists who exposed it.

So this has always been the stupidest meme used by creationist idiots.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
hypatiab7
2017-09-13 09:03:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Sorry about the mixup, but the creationists do keep bringing that up.
It wasn't scientists who perpetrated the Piltdown fraud. It was scientists who exposed it.
Definitely. John Monkeyboi is well aware of this. This is at least the tenth times he's brought it up. One of us must have asked him to provide evidence
that his god ever existed. He uses old arguments to try to change the subject.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
So this has always been the stupidest meme used by creationist idiots.
Overused. It makes the creationists look foolish.
Christopher A. Lee
2017-09-13 12:46:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:03:59 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Sorry about the mixup, but the creationists do keep bringing that up.
It wasn't scientists who perpetrated the Piltdown fraud. It was scientists who exposed it.
Definitely. John Monkeyboi is well aware of this. This is at least the tenth times he's brought it up. One of us must have asked him to provide evidence
that his god ever existed. He uses old arguments to try to change the subject.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
So this has always been the stupidest meme used by creationist idiots.
Overused. It makes the creationists look foolish.
The same idiots keep bringing up the same off-topic, stupid nonsense
over and over again - and keep ignoring rebuttal, refutation. etc.
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-13 18:36:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:03:59 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Sorry about the mixup, but the creationists do keep bringing that up.
It wasn't scientists who perpetrated the Piltdown fraud. It was scientists who exposed it.
Definitely. John Monkeyboi is well aware of this. This is at least the tenth times he's brought it up. One of us must have asked him to provide evidence
that his god ever existed. He uses old arguments to try to change the subject.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
So this has always been the stupidest meme used by creationist idiots.
Overused. It makes the creationists look foolish.
The same idiots keep bringing up the same off-topic, stupid nonsense
over and over again - and keep ignoring rebuttal, refutation. etc.
Because they have nothing else.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Malte Runz
2017-09-13 20:44:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:36:52 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas"
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:03:59 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Sorry about the mixup, but the creationists do keep bringing that up.
It wasn't scientists who perpetrated the Piltdown fraud. It was scientists who exposed it.
Definitely. John Monkeyboi is well aware of this. This is at least the tenth times he's brought it up. One of us must have asked him to provide evidence
that his god ever existed. He uses old arguments to try to change the subject.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
So this has always been the stupidest meme used by creationist idiots.
Overused. It makes the creationists look foolish.
The same idiots keep bringing up the same off-topic, stupid nonsense
over and over again - and keep ignoring rebuttal, refutation. etc.
Because they have nothing else.
And they even fail at that. We all know that had PM been real, it
would have forced us to rethink human evolution. Also, had Haeckel
been right, when he interpreted the folds in human embryos as gill
slits, it would have been very difficult to explain indeed.
--
Malte Runz
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-13 18:34:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Sorry about the mixup, but the creationists do keep bringing that up.
It wasn't scientists who perpetrated the Piltdown fraud. It was scientists who exposed it.
Definitely. John Monkeyboi is well aware of this. This is at least the tenth times he's brought it up. One of us must have asked him to provide evidence
that his god ever existed. He uses old arguments to try to change the subject.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
So this has always been the stupidest meme used by creationist idiots.
Overused. It makes the creationists look foolish.
But they have nothing more to offer.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
hypatiab7
2017-09-14 05:26:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Jeanne Douglas
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Sorry about the mixup, but the creationists do keep bringing that up.
It wasn't scientists who perpetrated the Piltdown fraud. It was scientists who exposed it.
Definitely. John Monkeyboi is well aware of this. This is at least the tenth times he's brought it up. One of us must have asked him to provide evidence
that his god ever existed. He uses old arguments to try to change the subject.
Post by Jeanne Douglas
So this has always been the stupidest meme used by creationist idiots.
Overused. It makes the creationists look foolish.
But they have nothing more to offer.
Which is why they keep repeating the same old garbage. They have nothing new.
And all the old stuff has been disproved to our satisfaction. Not theirs. Ours.
hypatiab7
2017-09-11 05:34:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
(snip)
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
Again with the old stuff. Piltdown Man is a proven fraud. When scientists
recognize a fraud, they admit it. Piltdown Man was revealed to be a fraud
a century ago. ...
That was me suggesting that maybe Assdestroid believes that the find
was a deliberate hoax like Piltdown man.
Post by hypatiab7
... Now, do you want to discuss those footprints down in Texas?
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/Delk.jpg
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm
http://www.badarchaeology.com/out-of-place-artefacts/footprints-and-the-like/the-paluxy-river-%e2%80%98footprints%e2%80%99/
Post by Don Martin
It's like they're not even trying.
(snip)
--
Malte Runz
Attila
2017-09-10 18:13:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 02:28:32 -0400, "Andrew"
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
Same old, same old. Andrew can't provide evidence that his god ever existed,
There is no 'god' but there is plenty of evidence for the awesome God.
Such as what? Clear and unambiguous evidence only, please.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Malte Runz
2017-09-10 03:18:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts
What truth? A fantasized interpretation of bones from a cave is -->not truth.
Post by Malte Runz
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
'It's a fraud'. Is this all you have to say about it? Andrew has it
down to one word, 'fantasy!'. But tell us, what is fraudulent about
the find? Did they create fake fossils?
No, the problem is with the fantasized story they try to spin. ...
Called it!

(snip quote mine #1)
Post by Andrew
See? That's how it's done.
(snip quote mine #2)
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Is it Piltdown man all over
again? Are they simply the bones of dwarfed chimps with crouzon
syndrome? Give me something... anything! And prepare to have it
shoved, unconditionally, unceremoniously and unlubricated, right back
up again.
You're jealous and frustrated because you know you're fighting a
lost battle. Evolution is a fact.
Always has been since Creation. Adaptation and variation within a
reproducible kind.
It's called evolution.

(snip goddidit)
--
Malte Runz
hypatiab7
2017-09-09 07:28:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
You din't even check them out, did you? What are you afraid of, fiat creationist?
Attila
2017-09-10 17:37:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 06:19:41 -0700 (PDT), ***@yahoo.com in
alt.atheism with message-id
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
Yet it serves reliably as a basis for several sciences.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Andrew
2017-09-13 10:26:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Attila
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
Yet it serves reliably as a basis for several sciences.
The "goo to you" myth has not been
helpful in any practical way.......ever.
Attila
2017-09-13 11:12:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:26:07 -0400, "Andrew"
Post by Andrew
Post by Attila
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
The truth hurts the deliberately ignorant. And creationists like John Monkeyboi
always consider their religion more important than the truth.
Evolution fraud keeps on going.
Yet it serves reliably as a basis for several sciences.
The "goo to you" myth has not been
helpful in any practical way.......ever.
Of course it has, but you can never admit it.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Andrew
2017-09-13 15:01:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
<<>>
Post by Attila
Post by Andrew
The "goo to you" myth has not been
helpful in any practical way...... ever.
Of course it has, but you can never
admit it.
Well yes. It has been food
for the gullible masses.
Mitchell Holman
2017-09-07 12:25:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't
seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolution
ary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
Evolution observed and documented:


http://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/

http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/02/evolution-in-real-time/

http://discovermagazine.com/2015/march/19-life-in-the-fast-lane
Atlatl Axolotl
2017-09-07 15:44:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
So do tell us -- if not a member of the rather bushy branch of
hominids of which we are one twig, then what exactly
were these the bones of?


AtlAxo
The Chief Castrator Of The Jews
2017-09-07 17:33:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
:-)
She would not tell the difference. She just reports unverifiable materials from her teachers like a school girl with no mind of her own to test the validity of information
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-08 07:44:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Chief Castrator Of The Jews
Post by A***@yahoo.com
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. Just a fluff piece.
:-)
She would not tell the difference. She just reports unverifiable materials from her teachers like a school girl with no mind of her own to test the validity of information
How do you sleep at night libeling people like this?
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Malte Runz
2017-09-07 20:57:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
no proof of evolution. ...
You're right. Evolution has been 'proven' a long, long time ago. This
find just adds to our knowledge and understanding of our own evolution
from monkey (!) to Homo sapiens sapiens.
... Just a fluff piece.
How does it feel to be the one, who is never able to link to new
finds, who, when we get down to the nitty gritty, has absolutely
nothing to show, but who's opposed to what is supported by all the
evidence?
--
Malte Runz
Cloud Hobbit
2017-09-07 21:06:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
There is no need for further evidence of evolution.
It has already been coinformed enough that is recognized by the overwhelming majority of scientists world wide.

It's only a few religious morons who deny it.
John Locke
2017-09-07 05:06:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 20:03:50 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
This article is two years old. I'm reposting it for anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested.
https://www.wpr.org/uw-researchers-discover-new-branch-human-evolutionary-tree
...and here's the really excellent NOVA documentary, Dawn of Humanity:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/evolution/dawn-of-humanity.html

Program Description:

NOVA and National Geographic present exclusive access to a unique
discovery of ancient remains. Located in an almost inaccessible
chamber deep in a South African cave, the site required recruiting a
special team of experts slender enough to wriggle down a vertical,
pitch-dark, seven-inch-wide passage. Most fossil discoveries of human
relatives consist of just a handful of bones. But down in this hidden
chamber, the team uncovered an unprecedented trove—so far, over 1,500
bones—with the potential to rewrite the story of our origins. They may
help fill in a crucial gap in the fossil record and tell us how Homo,
the first member of the human family, emerged from ape-like ancestors
like the famous Lucy. But how did hundreds of bones end up in the
remote chamber? The experts are considering every mind-boggling
possibility. Join NOVA on the treacherous descent into this cave of
spectacular and enigmatic finds, and discover their startling
implications for the saga of what made us human.
Andrew
2017-09-13 15:30:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.

But you will not provide it.

Why?

Because you are afraid to.
Attila
2017-09-13 18:46:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
But you will not provide it.
Why?
Because you are afraid to.
How about this?

1. ground for belief or disbelief; data on which to base proof or to
establish truth or falsehood

2. something that makes another thing evident; indication; sign

3. something which shows that something else exists or is true

4. the available body of facts or information indicating whether a
belief or proposition is true or valid.

synonyms: proof, confirmation, verification, substantiation,
corroboration


Good enough for you? Probably not.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Syd M.
2017-09-13 19:56:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
Why? So you can ignore it again?

PDW
Jeanne Douglas
2017-09-13 23:33:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Syd M.
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
Why? So you can ignore it again?
How many thousands of times have we told our trolls that evidence must be objective and, most importantly, verifiable by anyone who chooses to do the work.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
Malte Runz
2017-09-13 21:10:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
I have absolutely no clue what kind of evidence would convince me. But
I'll know when I see it.
Post by Andrew
But you will not provide it.
Why?
Because you are afraid to.
No, because it's really not the non-believer's problem. You claim
there is a god, so you must provide the evidence. I'll look at it, and
if it fails to convince me, you're welcome to try again. In the
meantime, I shall remain utterly uninterested in anything you imagine
your god is up to.

Go ahead, schmuck, and threaten me with eternal hell fire.
--
Malte Runz
Andrew
2017-09-13 22:50:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
I have absolutely no clue what kind of
evidence would convince me.
Thanks.
Post by Malte Runz
But I'll know when I see it.
Post by Andrew
But you will not provide it.
Why?
Because you are afraid to.
No, because it's really not the non-believer's problem.
If you ask for evidence, you need to first have criteria
to evaluate any evidence that is submitted. If you don't,
then you are dishonest.
Post by Malte Runz
You claim
there is a god, so you must provide the evidence. I'll look at it, and
if it fails to convince me, you're welcome to try again. In the
meantime, I shall remain utterly uninterested in anything you imagine
your god is up to.
Go ahead, schmuck, and threaten me with eternal hell fire.
--
Malte Runz
Atlatl Axolotl
2017-09-13 23:00:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
I have absolutely no clue what kind of
evidence would convince me.
Thanks.
Post by Malte Runz
But I'll know when I see it.
Post by Andrew
But you will not provide it.
Why?
Because you are afraid to.
No, because it's really not the non-believer's problem.
.> If you ask for evidence, you need to first have criteria
.> to evaluate any evidence that is submitted. If you don't,
.> then you are dishonest.

Right. In fact that's why prosecutors and defense attorneys
are required to ask each juror what evidence would convince them
before they present their arguments.

Also why scientific journals do not allow anyone to
read their articles without first submitting an affidavit
attesting to what scientific evidence they would find convincing.


AA
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
You claim
there is a god, so you must provide the evidence. I'll look at it, and
if it fails to convince me, you're welcome to try again. In the
meantime, I shall remain utterly uninterested in anything you imagine
your god is up to.
Go ahead, schmuck, and threaten me with eternal hell fire.
--
Malte Runz
Andrew
2017-09-13 23:46:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
I have absolutely no clue what kind of
evidence would convince me.
Thanks.
Post by Malte Runz
But I'll know when I see it.
Post by Andrew
But you will not provide it.
Why?
Because you are afraid to.
No, because it's really not the non-believer's problem.
.> If you ask for evidence, you need to first have criteria
.> to evaluate any evidence that is submitted. If you don't,
.> then you are dishonest.
Right. In fact that's why prosecutors and defense attorneys
are required to ask each juror what evidence would convince them
before they present their arguments.
Also why scientific journals do not allow anyone to
read their articles without first submitting an affidavit
attesting to what scientific evidence they would find convincing.
AA
Good point.

All atheists take note. Next time you cry for, "evidence".
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
You claim
there is a god, so you must provide the evidence. I'll look at it,
See above.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
if it fails to convince me, you're welcome to try again. In the
meantime, I shall remain utterly uninterested in anything you imagine
your god is up to.
Go ahead, schmuck, and threaten me with eternal hell fire.
--
Malte Runz
Attila
2017-09-14 08:48:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 19:46:44 -0400, "Andrew"
Post by Andrew
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
I have absolutely no clue what kind of
evidence would convince me.
Thanks.
Post by Malte Runz
But I'll know when I see it.
Post by Andrew
But you will not provide it.
Why?
Because you are afraid to.
No, because it's really not the non-believer's problem.
.> If you ask for evidence, you need to first have criteria
.> to evaluate any evidence that is submitted. If you don't,
.> then you are dishonest.
Right. In fact that's why prosecutors and defense attorneys
are required to ask each juror what evidence would convince them
before they present their arguments.
Also why scientific journals do not allow anyone to
read their articles without first submitting an affidavit
attesting to what scientific evidence they would find convincing.
AA
Good point.
Not really, since it is wrong.
Post by Andrew
All atheists take note. Next time you cry for, "evidence".
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
You claim
there is a god, so you must provide the evidence. I'll look at it,
See above.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
if it fails to convince me, you're welcome to try again. In the
meantime, I shall remain utterly uninterested in anything you imagine
your god is up to.
Go ahead, schmuck, and threaten me with eternal hell fire.
--
Malte Runz
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
Attila
2017-09-14 08:48:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:00:12 -0700 (PDT), Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Andrew
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
I have absolutely no clue what kind of
evidence would convince me.
Thanks.
Post by Malte Runz
But I'll know when I see it.
Post by Andrew
But you will not provide it.
Why?
Because you are afraid to.
No, because it's really not the non-believer's problem.
.> If you ask for evidence, you need to first have criteria
.> to evaluate any evidence that is submitted. If you don't,
.> then you are dishonest.
Right. In fact that's why prosecutors and defense attorneys
are required to ask each juror what evidence would convince them
before they present their arguments.
I have been on several juries, civil and criminal, but I have never
hears anyone ask that.
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Also why scientific journals do not allow anyone to
read their articles without first submitting an affidavit
attesting to what scientific evidence they would find convincing.
Anyone is free to read any scientific journal, I have read a number
of them without such an affidavit.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I am not conservative so much as a rabid anti-liberal.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.
hypatiab7
2017-09-14 05:16:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
But you will not provide it.
How would I know until I see or hear it? Yours is a stupid
request. It's a very common one though. Where did you get it
from? If I knew what would convince me, I'd be convinced. So,
are you able to provide evidence that your god ever existed?
Can you do this without using the Bible or faith. If you can't,
you have nothing. Is that enough criteria for you?
Post by Andrew
Why?
Because you are afraid to.
Nope. I just did. But you won't accept it because you can't understand
my answer.
Christopher A. Lee
2017-09-14 06:47:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:16:25 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Post by hypatiab7
You have yet to provide evidence that
your so-called creator ever existed.
Just as soon as you provide what is the
required criteria for the evidence to be
acceptable to you.
But you will not provide it.
The proven serial, in-your-face liar knows perfectly well that
whatever it is, it has to lead objectively to that conclusion.

After all, this has been explained to him over and over again for many
years.

He also knows that we only demand evidence to get him to shut the fuck
up when he can't put up.

But he is psychologically incapable of this, even though he knows he
can't put up.
Post by hypatiab7
How would I know until I see or hear it? Yours is a stupid
request. It's a very common one though. Where did you get it
from? If I knew what would convince me, I'd be convinced. So,
are you able to provide evidence that your god ever existed?
Can you do this without using the Bible or faith. If you can't,
you have nothing. Is that enough criteria for you?
He can't even describe this hypothetical god in such a way that we
could tell him what would be evidence - even though that's not our
job.

Religion makes people sociopathic, stupid and dishonest,
Post by hypatiab7
Post by Andrew
Why?
Because you are afraid to.
Nope. I just did. But you won't accept it because you can't understand
my answer.
Loading...