Discussion:
God's call for love
Add Reply
Andrew
2018-06-07 20:13:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
Davej
2018-06-07 20:38:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Andrew
2018-06-08 01:27:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you.
He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Davej
2018-06-08 02:31:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you.
He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
Andrew
2018-06-08 05:11:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you.
He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old
Testament? I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
you are _not_ an atheist.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-06-08 06:50:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
Post by Andrew
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you.
He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old
Testament? I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text -
you are _not_ an atheist.


If you believe that you're not very bright.

The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that Christians like to claim.

You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
aaa
2018-06-08 12:25:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament? I
think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery quote
more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that Christians
like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack the
capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Yap Honghor
2018-06-10 11:46:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament? I
think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery quote
more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that Christians
like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack the
capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
aaa
2018-06-10 13:45:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love
comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack
the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the human
general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy. If you agree that science should not
involve itself in philosophy, you should not judge things written in the
Bible based on your provisional knowledge in science.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-06-10 22:15:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes from
God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery quote
more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that Christians
like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack
the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the human
general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not
involve itself in philosophy, you should not judge things written in the
Bible based on your provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of knowledge
of science.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-06-11 02:30:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes from
God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery quote
more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that Christians
like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack
the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the human
general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have to
prove that water is water.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not
involve itself in philosophy, you should not judge things written in the
Bible based on your provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of knowledge
of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with science
when it involves itself in philosophy.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-06-11 21:56:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack
the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the human
general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have to
prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy, you
should not judge things written in the Bible based on your provisional
knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of knowledge
of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with science
when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Kevrob
2018-06-11 22:05:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack
the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the human
general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have to
prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy, you
should not judge things written in the Bible based on your provisional
knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of knowledge
of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with science
when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
--
Natural science was once known as "natural philosophy."

Philosophers have been thinking about scientific questions,
and even "doing science" since the pre-Socratics. Democritus
is a favorite, as is Eratosthenes, who figured out the size
of the earth, through observation and calculation!

Kevin R
Smiler
2018-06-11 23:25:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
Natural science was once known as "natural philosophy."
Philosophers have been thinking about scientific questions, and even
"doing science" since the pre-Socratics. Democritus is a favorite, as
is Eratosthenes, who figured out the size of the earth, through
observation and calculation!
CORRECTION:- MODERN science doesn't involve itself with philosophy.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-06-12 15:25:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Kevrob
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack
the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the human
general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have to
prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy, you
should not judge things written in the Bible based on your provisional
knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of knowledge
of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with science
when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
--
Natural science was once known as "natural philosophy."
A stupid mistake thanks to the flawed learning of Aristotle. Science is
the exact opposite of philosophy. There is no similarity between them.
Post by Kevrob
Philosophers have been thinking about scientific questions,
and even "doing science" since the pre-Socratics. Democritus
is a favorite, as is Eratosthenes, who figured out the size
of the earth, through observation and calculation!
A good scientist is rarely a good philosopher. In my opinion, science
and philosophy are based on entirely different parts of brain functions.
The philosophical is never scientific, and vice versa.
Post by Kevrob
Kevin R
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-06-12 18:01:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
A good scientist is rarely a good philosopher. In my opinion, science
and philosophy are based on entirely different parts of brain
functions. The philosophical is never scientific, and vice versa.
Since you have never studied science
OR philosophy how would you know?
Yosemite Sam
2018-06-12 22:36:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
He studied the Privacy Act and wants to know why you talk about his science & philosophy.
Oko Tillo
2018-06-12 23:30:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
ooo
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
A good scientist is rarely a good philosopher. In my opinion, science
and philosophy are based on entirely different parts of brain
functions. The philosophical is never scientific, and vice versa.
Since you have never studied science
OR philosophy how would you know?
Silly, because he can "Know without thinking and understand without learning".

I mean, didn't he tell us that his very own self?

Thus a complete and total absence of both thinking and learning have made him
an unparalleled expert in these matters.


Oko
aaa
2018-06-13 04:27:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
A good scientist is rarely a good philosopher. In my opinion, science
and philosophy are based on entirely different parts of brain
functions. The philosophical is never scientific, and vice versa.
Since you have never studied science
OR philosophy how would you know?
You are welcome to prove me wrong.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-06-13 13:17:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
A good scientist is rarely a good philosopher. In my opinion, science
and philosophy are based on entirely different parts of brain
functions. The philosophical is never scientific, and vice versa.
Since you have never studied science
OR philosophy how would you know?
You are welcome to prove me wrong.
You have to prove yourself *right*, remember?




"A personal understanding is no different from
a claim. It still needs to be proven first."
"aaa", March 28 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y99wc8f2
aaa
2018-06-13 16:07:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
A good scientist is rarely a good philosopher. In my opinion, science
and philosophy are based on entirely different parts of brain
functions. The philosophical is never scientific, and vice versa.
Since you have never studied science
OR philosophy how would you know?
You are welcome to prove me wrong.
You have to prove yourself *right*, remember?
I believe it does make sense. I'm sure there is nothing you can't
understand.
Post by Mitchell Holman
"A personal understanding is no different from
a claim. It still needs to be proven first."
"aaa", March 28 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y99wc8f2
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
aaa
2018-06-12 15:15:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack
the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the human
general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have to
prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy, you
should not judge things written in the Bible based on your provisional
knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of knowledge
of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with science
when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life. Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-06-12 22:16:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Kevrob
2018-06-12 22:42:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
If NiuNian disagrees with me, chances are, I'm right.

"Modern science" is just "natural philosophy" under a new
name. It became such an expansive field, with sub-fields
of its own (Physics, Geology, Astronomy, Chemistry, Biology,
etc) that people forget that it is a branch of the tree of
Philosophy.

In another group, someone pointed out a job posting ad for a computer
science/information technology position: Ontologist.

Ontology is a subset of metaphysics, but, apparently, the
data wranglers borrowed the term a couple of decades ago for
IT types dealing with "...how such entities may be grouped,
related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according
to similarities and differences..."

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology

So, there's also this, now:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology_(information_science)

So, philosophy and science continue to interact.

aaa, knowing nothing about either field, can STFU.

Kevin R
aaa
2018-06-13 04:41:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
It should be obvious to everyone because it's such simple point. Science
can only study biology. Science can never study life because life is a
philosophical subject by the definition of dictionary. Evolutionists
need to go to another universe and write their own dictionary in order
to justify themselves in explaining life when they have less than zero
understanding of life philosophically speaking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Oko Tillo
2018-06-13 06:50:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
It should be obvious to everyone because it's such simple point. Science
can only study biology. Science can never study life because life is a
philosophical subject by the definition of dictionary.
Wait! You actually went out and looked something up?!?!?

Excellent.

Now show us what dictionary you found that definition of life in:




Oko
Post by aaa
Evolutionists
need to go to another universe and write their own dictionary in order
to justify themselves in explaining life when they have less than zero
understanding of life philosophically speaking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
--
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
aaa
2018-06-13 13:17:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
It should be obvious to everyone because it's such simple point. Science
can only study biology. Science can never study life because life is a
philosophical subject by the definition of dictionary.
Wait! You actually went out and looked something up?!?!?
Excellent.
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study of
philosophy instead of science. Science answers the question of the
world. Philosophy answers the question of life. It's why science looks
out to the world while philosophy looks in to the heart and mind. Are
you going to disagree with me?
Post by Oko Tillo
Oko
Post by aaa
Evolutionists
need to go to another universe and write their own dictionary in order
to justify themselves in explaining life when they have less than zero
understanding of life philosophically speaking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
--
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-06-13 18:16:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study
of philosophy instead of science.
Philosophy:
the rational investigation of the
truths and principles of being,
knowledge, or conduct.
a particular system of thought
based on such study or investigation
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/philosophy?s=t

Nope, no mention of "life" there.



philosophy
The study of the fundamental nature of
knowledge, reality, and existence,
especially when considered as an academic
discipline.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/philosophy


Nope, no mention of "life" there either



philosophy
the use of reason in understanding such
things as the nature of the real world
and existence, the use and limits of
knowledge, and the principles of moral
judgment:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/philosophy


Nope, no mention of "life" at all.
aaa
2018-06-13 23:25:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study
of philosophy instead of science.
the rational investigation of the
truths and principles of being,
knowledge, or conduct.
a particular system of thought
based on such study or investigation
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/philosophy?s=t
Nope, no mention of "life" there.
philosophy
The study of the fundamental nature of
knowledge, reality, and existence,
especially when considered as an academic
discipline.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" there either
philosophy
the use of reason in understanding such
things as the nature of the real world
and existence, the use and limits of
knowledge, and the principles of moral
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" at all.
Then you need to find a better definition. How about I give you the
clear and precise one? Philosophy is the study of the spiritual, and the
spiritual is all about life and nothing about death.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-06-14 02:31:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study
of philosophy instead of science.
the rational investigation of the
truths and principles of being,
knowledge, or conduct.
a particular system of thought
based on such study or investigation
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/philosophy?s=t
Nope, no mention of "life" there.
philosophy
The study of the fundamental nature of
knowledge, reality, and existence,
especially when considered as an academic
discipline.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" there either
philosophy
the use of reason in understanding such
things as the nature of the real world
and existence, the use and limits of
knowledge, and the principles of moral
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" at all.
Then you need to find a better definition.
You claimed ALL dictionaries show "life
is the study of philosophy"

I just showed you THREE that do not.

Ergo you lied.
Post by aaa
How about I give you the
clear and precise one?
How about you back up your claim?
Atlatl Axolotl
2018-06-14 03:23:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study
of philosophy instead of science.
the rational investigation of the
truths and principles of being,
knowledge, or conduct.
a particular system of thought
based on such study or investigation
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/philosophy?s=t
Nope, no mention of "life" there.
philosophy
The study of the fundamental nature of
knowledge, reality, and existence,
especially when considered as an academic
discipline.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" there either
philosophy
the use of reason in understanding such
things as the nature of the real world
and existence, the use and limits of
knowledge, and the principles of moral
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/philosophy
,,
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Nope, no mention of "life" at all.
Then you need to find a better definition.
You claimed ALL dictionaries show "life
is the study of philosophy"
I just showed you THREE that do not.
Ergo you lied.
Naw, naw -- see, he tasked you with finding "a better definition".

When I was a kid, we called that a "snipe hunt".

When I was a little older, and got a summer job in oceanography,
they'd give you a bucket and tell you to go out and collect a tsunami.

That was back when everyone here called it a "tidal wave", and
almost no one knew the Japanese word "tsunami".

(I did, and thus didn't fall for it)

That was the oceanography geek equivalent of a snipe hunt.

And now you have "aaa"s version of a snipe hunt -- go ye forth and find a non-existent beast.
A dictionary containing the "definition" he just made up, and nobody else has heard of,
let alone uses.


AA
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
How about I give you the
clear and precise one?
How about you back up your claim?
Smiler
2018-06-14 23:57:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Atlatl Axolotl
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the
study of philosophy instead of science.
the rational investigation of the truths and principles of being,
knowledge, or conduct.
a particular system of thought based on such study or investigation
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/philosophy?s=t
Nope, no mention of "life" there.
philosophy The study of the fundamental nature of knowledge,
reality, and existence,
especially when considered as an academic discipline.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" there either
philosophy the use of reason in understanding such things as the
nature of the real world and existence, the use and limits of
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/philosophy
,,
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Nope, no mention of "life" at all.
Then you need to find a better definition.
You claimed ALL dictionaries show "life
is the study of philosophy"
I just showed you THREE that do not.
Ergo you lied.
Naw, naw -- see, he tasked you with finding "a better definition".
When I was a kid, we called that a "snipe hunt".
When I was a little older, and got a summer job in oceanography,
they'd give you a bucket and tell you to go out and collect a tsunami.
That was back when everyone here called it a "tidal wave", and almost no
one knew the Japanese word "tsunami".
(I did, and thus didn't fall for it)
That was the oceanography geek equivalent of a snipe hunt.
And now you have "aaa"s version of a snipe hunt -- go ye forth and find
a non-existent beast.
A dictionary containing the "definition" he just made up, and nobody else has heard of,
let alone uses.
Known in the UK as 'a wild goose chase'.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-06-14 15:48:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study
of philosophy instead of science.
the rational investigation of the
truths and principles of being,
knowledge, or conduct.
a particular system of thought
based on such study or investigation
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/philosophy?s=t
Nope, no mention of "life" there.
philosophy
The study of the fundamental nature of
knowledge, reality, and existence,
especially when considered as an academic
discipline.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" there either
philosophy
the use of reason in understanding such
things as the nature of the real world
and existence, the use and limits of
knowledge, and the principles of moral
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" at all.
Then you need to find a better definition.
You claimed ALL dictionaries show "life
is the study of philosophy"
I just showed you THREE that do not.
Ergo you lied.
I'm sure you haven't found a good dictionary. That's why you can't find
anything.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
How about I give you the
clear and precise one?
How about you back up your claim?
This is rather basic understanding in philosophy. It's something for you
to learn and realize. It's not something for me to prove or
indoctrinate. You don't need to be convinced by me. You need to be
convinced by your own understanding.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-06-14 18:00:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study
of philosophy instead of science.
the rational investigation of the
truths and principles of being,
knowledge, or conduct.
a particular system of thought
based on such study or investigation
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/philosophy?s=t
Nope, no mention of "life" there.
philosophy
The study of the fundamental nature of
knowledge, reality, and existence,
especially when considered as an academic
discipline.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" there either
philosophy
the use of reason in understanding such
things as the nature of the real world
and existence, the use and limits of
knowledge, and the principles of moral
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/philosophy
Nope, no mention of "life" at all.
Then you need to find a better definition.
You claimed ALL dictionaries show "life
is the study of philosophy"
I just showed you THREE that do not.
Ergo you lied.
I'm sure you haven't found a good dictionary. That's why you can't find
anything.
Three dictionaries prove you are wrong,
you cannot find any proving you are right.

Case closed.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
How about I give you the
clear and precise one?
How about you back up your claim?
This is rather basic understanding in philosophy.
If it is so basic then prove it.



It's something for you
Post by aaa
to learn and realize. It's not something for me to prove or
indoctrinate.
"I believe all dictionaries will agree
with me that life is the study of philosophy
instead of science."

Your claim, from the above.
Oko Tillo
2018-06-13 18:46:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in
philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
It should be obvious to everyone because it's such simple point. Science
can only study biology. Science can never study life because life is a
philosophical subject by the definition of dictionary.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Wait! You actually went out and looked something up?!?!?
Excellent.
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study of
philosophy instead of science.
In that case you should have no trouble at all giving us multiple
links to many dictionary sites defining life as the study of philosophy.

But hey, let's start slow. For now, just give us one such link.

Hop to it:








Oko






Science answers the question of the
Post by aaa
world. Philosophy answers the question of life. It's why science looks
out to the world while philosophy looks in to the heart and mind. Are
you going to disagree with me?
Post by Oko Tillo
Oko
Post by aaa
Evolutionists
need to go to another universe and write their own dictionary in order
to justify themselves in explaining life when they have less than zero
understanding of life philosophically speaking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
--
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
--
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
aaa
2018-06-13 23:20:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in
philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
It should be obvious to everyone because it's such simple point. Science
can only study biology. Science can never study life because life is a
philosophical subject by the definition of dictionary.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Wait! You actually went out and looked something up?!?!?
Excellent.
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study of
philosophy instead of science.
In that case you should have no trouble at all giving us multiple
links to many dictionary sites defining life as the study of philosophy.
But hey, let's start slow. For now, just give us one such link.
Sorry, I don't have any. I'm sure you can find it yourself.
Post by Oko Tillo
Oko
Science answers the question of the
Post by aaa
world. Philosophy answers the question of life. It's why science looks
out to the world while philosophy looks in to the heart and mind. Are
you going to disagree with me?
Post by Oko Tillo
Oko
Post by aaa
Evolutionists
need to go to another universe and write their own dictionary in order
to justify themselves in explaining life when they have less than zero
understanding of life philosophically speaking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
--
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
--
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Oko Tillo
2018-06-14 00:22:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in
philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
It should be obvious to everyone because it's such simple point. Science
can only study biology. Science can never study life because life is a
philosophical subject by the definition of dictionary.
ooo
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Wait! You actually went out and looked something up?!?!?
Excellent.
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study of
philosophy instead of science.
In that case you should have no trouble at all giving us multiple
links to many dictionary sites defining life as the study of philosophy.
But hey, let's start slow. For now, just give us one such link.
Sorry, I don't have any. I'm sure you can find it yourself.
I'm quite confident that I could not. Because there is not even one such thing.

You completely made it up that "all dictionaries will agree" with you.

Also known as "lying".

Or it would be considered lying, except that we have long realized
that you live in your own private self-constructed reality, one with
few points of contact with the real world, and thus everything
inside your little world will automatically agree with you.
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Science answers the question of the
Post by aaa
world. Philosophy answers the question of life. It's why science looks
out to the world while philosophy looks in to the heart and mind. Are
you going to disagree with me?
Post by Oko Tillo
Oko
Post by aaa
Evolutionists
need to go to another universe and write their own dictionary in order
to justify themselves in explaining life when they have less than zero
understanding of life philosophically speaking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
%
2018-06-14 00:23:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in
philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
It should be obvious to everyone because it's such simple point. Science
can only study biology. Science can never study life because life is a
philosophical subject by the definition of dictionary.
ooo
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Wait! You actually went out and looked something up?!?!?
Excellent.
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study of
philosophy instead of science.
In that case you should have no trouble at all giving us multiple
links to many dictionary sites defining life as the study of philosophy.
But hey, let's start slow. For now, just give us one such link.
Sorry, I don't have any. I'm sure you can find it yourself.
I'm quite confident that I could not. Because there is not even one such thing.
You completely made it up that "all dictionaries will agree" with you.
Also known as "lying".
Or it would be considered lying, except that we have long realized
that you live in your own private self-constructed reality, one with
few points of contact with the real world, and thus everything
inside your little world will automatically agree with you.
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Science answers the question of the
Post by aaa
world. Philosophy answers the question of life. It's why science looks
out to the world while philosophy looks in to the heart and mind. Are
you going to disagree with me?
Post by Oko Tillo
Oko
Post by aaa
Evolutionists
need to go to another universe and write their own dictionary in order
to justify themselves in explaining life when they have less than zero
understanding of life philosophically speaking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
god owes me for the call
Malte Runz
2018-06-14 09:04:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:22:04 -0700 (PDT), Oko Tillo
<***@gmail.com> wrote:

(snip)
Post by Oko Tillo
Or it would be considered lying, except that we have long realized
that you live in your own private self-constructed reality, one with
few points of contact with the real world, and thus everything
inside your little world will automatically agree with you.
Which also means that nothing any of us say or do will have any impact
whatsoever. He's simply not capable of realizing that he is wrong and
that he has been corrected by people who know better.

IOW dealing with that guy is a complete waste of time.

I don't know why it bugs me that much when I see all of you responding
and engaging with him... but it does. Please, stop it. I've kill filed
people for less ;-)
--
Malte Runz
Atlatl Axolotl
2018-06-14 12:46:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:22:04 -0700 (PDT), Oko Tillo
(snip)
Post by Oko Tillo
Or it would be considered lying, except that we have long realized
that you live in your own private self-constructed reality, one with
few points of contact with the real world, and thus everything
inside your little world will automatically agree with you.
,,
Post by Malte Runz
Which also means that nothing any of us say or do will have any impact
whatsoever. He's simply not capable of realizing that he is wrong and
that he has been corrected by people who know better.
You should just ignore those threads. Just like I ignore anything
"The Borg", "Bob", Jahnu, or dolf start.

Well, usually...


AA
Post by Malte Runz
IOW dealing with that guy is a complete waste of time.
I don't know why it bugs me that much when I see all of you responding
and engaging with him... but it does. Please, stop it. I've kill filed
people for less ;-)
--
Malte Runz
aaa
2018-06-14 16:04:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in
philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
It should be obvious to everyone because it's such simple point. Science
can only study biology. Science can never study life because life is a
philosophical subject by the definition of dictionary.
ooo
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Wait! You actually went out and looked something up?!?!?
Excellent.
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study of
philosophy instead of science.
In that case you should have no trouble at all giving us multiple
links to many dictionary sites defining life as the study of philosophy.
But hey, let's start slow. For now, just give us one such link.
Sorry, I don't have any. I'm sure you can find it yourself.
I'm quite confident that I could not. Because there is not even one such thing.
You completely made it up that "all dictionaries will agree" with you.
Also known as "lying".
Or it would be considered lying, except that we have long realized
that you live in your own private self-constructed reality, one with
few points of contact with the real world, and thus everything
inside your little world will automatically agree with you.
That's unfortunate. I believe this is rather basic knowledge. I can't
believe that you can't find anything.
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Science answers the question of the
Post by aaa
world. Philosophy answers the question of life. It's why science looks
out to the world while philosophy looks in to the heart and mind. Are
you going to disagree with me?
Post by Oko Tillo
Oko
Post by aaa
Evolutionists
need to go to another universe and write their own dictionary in order
to justify themselves in explaining life when they have less than zero
understanding of life philosophically speaking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Oko Tillo
2018-06-14 18:24:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in
philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
It should be obvious to everyone because it's such simple point. Science
can only study biology. Science can never study life because life is a
philosophical subject by the definition of dictionary.
ooo
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Wait! You actually went out and looked something up?!?!?
Excellent.
ooo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
I believe all dictionaries will agree with me that life is the study of
philosophy instead of science.
In that case you should have no trouble at all giving us multiple
links to many dictionary sites defining life as the study of philosophy.
But hey, let's start slow. For now, just give us one such link.
Sorry, I don't have any. I'm sure you can find it yourself.
I'm quite confident that I could not. Because there is not even one such thing.
You completely made it up that "all dictionaries will agree" with you.
Also known as "lying".
Or it would be considered lying, except that we have long realized
that you live in your own private self-constructed reality, one with
few points of contact with the real world, and thus everything
inside your little world will automatically agree with you.
That's unfortunate. I believe this is rather basic knowledge. I can't
believe that you can't find anything.
So that makes it hour turn. Show us. Give us a link.

After all, if "all dictionaries will agree" with you, it should take
you less than a minute.

So hop to it. Go. Get a-googling. Show us.

Right here. Now:












Oko
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Post by aaa
Post by Oko Tillo
Science answers the question of the
Post by aaa
world. Philosophy answers the question of life. It's why science looks
out to the world while philosophy looks in to the heart and mind. Are
you going to disagree with me?
Post by Oko Tillo
Oko
Post by aaa
Evolutionists
need to go to another universe and write their own dictionary in order
to justify themselves in explaining life when they have less than zero
understanding of life philosophically speaking.
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
--
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-06-13 18:41:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
- show quoted text -

Do you?

You keep repeating the same lies and sane folks deny your lies.

You keep asking to be proven wrong when you haven't proven anything. If you keep lying, we'll keep letting you know.

Of course that wouldn't be a problem if you weren't a troll pretending to be a moron.
aaa
2018-06-13 23:27:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say? - show quoted text -
Do you?
You keep repeating the same lies and sane folks deny your lies.
You keep asking to be proven wrong when you haven't proven anything.
If you keep lying, we'll keep letting you know.
Of course that wouldn't be a problem if you weren't a troll
pretending to be a moron.
I believe I do try to find something new to talk about everyday.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-06-14 00:12:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
You still have nothing but blind denial. Don't you have something new to
say?
- show quoted text -
Do you?
You keep repeating the same lies and sane folks deny your lies.
You keep asking to be proven wrong when you haven't proven anything. If
you keep lying, we'll keep letting you know.
Of course that wouldn't be a problem if you weren't a troll pretending to be a moron.
I believe that he's not pretending.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Yap Honghor
2018-06-11 01:39:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love
comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously lack
the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific thinking is
counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the human
general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy. If you agree that science should not
involve itself in philosophy, you should not judge things written in the
Bible based on your provisional knowledge in science.
There is no pixie in this universe, therefore there is no affairs for human to get involved with it.
aaa
2018-06-12 00:53:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by aaa
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because
love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves
blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old
Testament? I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated,
then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and
misery quote more accurate than the "God is all love"
nonsense that Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or
other matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy. If you agree that science should
not involve itself in philosophy, you should not judge things
written in the Bible based on your provisional knowledge in
science.
There is no pixie in this universe, therefore there is no affairs for
human to get involved with it.
That's just blind denial. The teaching of the Bible can't be denied.
Unless you can prove the teaching of the Bible wrong, you have no way to
deny God's existence.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Lucifer Morningstar
2018-06-09 00:13:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 23:50:45 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Cloud Hobbit doesn't get quoting.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Andrew
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
Post by Andrew
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you.
He loves blood and misery.
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old
Testament? I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text -
That's your job.


Cloud Hobbit wrote;
Post by Cloud Hobbit
you are _not_ an atheist.
Cloud Hobbit then replied to himself with;
Post by Cloud Hobbit
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
Amazing Answers
2018-06-08 14:18:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Lucifer Morningstar
2018-06-09 00:15:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
Amazing Answers
2018-06-09 05:45:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
inventing stories about God is unloving.
Lucifer Morningstar
2018-06-09 10:55:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 22:45:10 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
inventing stories about God is unloving.
God is about control not love.
hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
2018-06-12 02:18:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 22:45:10 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
inventing stories about God is unloving.
God is about control not love.
All gods are about mythology not reality. No Christian has ever been able
to disprove this. They all fall back on faith which proves nothing.
%
2018-06-12 02:23:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 22:45:10 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
inventing stories about God is unloving.
God is about control not love.
All gods are about mythology not reality. No Christian has ever been able
to disprove this. They all fall back on faith which proves nothing.
there is no proof you will accept ,
so its stupid to ask for any
Amazing Answers
2018-06-12 03:27:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 22:45:10 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
inventing stories about God is unloving.
God is about control not love.
If that were so you wouldn't have the liberty to say that.
Kevrob
2018-06-11 02:40:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
inventing stories about God is unloving.
So, the OT and NT authors should get gigged for that?

Kevin R
hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
2018-06-11 23:52:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
inventing stories about God is unloving.
Then, Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all unloving, since all three were invented by humans. You can't prove differently. You never have in what you
write and your trollish behavior.
%
2018-06-11 23:59:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
inventing stories about God is unloving.
Then, Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all unloving, since all three were invented by humans. You can't prove differently. You never have in what you
write and your trollish behavior.
there is no proof that you would accept so why ask for any
hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
2018-06-11 23:40:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
Whose 'moral standards' and what kind? Do your so-called 'moral standards say that non-Christians and atheists are immoral?
Lucifer Morningstar
2018-06-12 04:52:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 16:40:54 -0700 (PDT), "hypatiab7(hypatiab7)"
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:18:08 -0700 (PDT), Amazing Answers
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Our moral standards are too high for that kind of "love."
Whose 'moral standards' and what kind?
Yours and mine.
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Do your so-called 'moral standards say that non-Christians and
atheists are immoral?
My moral standards have no thoughts on that.
Christians are mostly immoral.

Do your so-called 'moral standards say that non-Christians and
atheists are immoral?
Yap Honghor
2018-06-10 11:47:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Unlike your pixie, Davej is not an evil being....
Amazing Answers
2018-06-12 03:28:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Unlike your pixie, Davej is not an evil being....
That was a mistaken and unloving claim.
hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
2018-06-11 23:32:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Amazing Answers
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
Why don't you love?
Why do you make foolish assumptions. Oh, yes, you're an annoyance troll.
Lucifer Morningstar
2018-06-09 00:08:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
aaa
2018-06-09 08:45:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.

God is beyond the thinking mind.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Lucifer Morningstar
2018-06-09 10:43:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
You seem to know God rather well so you must not have a
thinking mind.
aaa
2018-06-09 17:58:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
You seem to know God rather well so you must not have a
thinking mind.
I will take that as a compliment. Knowing without thinking and
understanding without learning is in fact a wonderful experience.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
2018-06-12 03:17:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
You seem to know God rather well so you must not have a
thinking mind.
I will take that as a compliment. Knowing without thinking and
understanding without learning is in fact a wonderful experience.
You must realize that you sound like a lunatic. You sound like a braindead empty shell waiting for someone or something to fill you up since you can't
do this on your own. Don't bother repeating all your regular garbage. It's
all been said by you pointlessly and repeatedly. Even if you are a phony,
you have to be a bit bonkers to keep repeating the same nonsense over and
over knowing that none of us accept what you push. That would make you
nothing but a looney annoyance troll.
%
2018-06-12 03:21:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
You seem to know God rather well so you must not have a
thinking mind.
I will take that as a compliment. Knowing without thinking and
understanding without learning is in fact a wonderful experience.
You must realize that you sound like a lunatic. You sound like a braindead empty shell waiting for someone or something to fill you up since you can't
do this on your own. Don't bother repeating all your regular garbage. It's
all been said by you pointlessly and repeatedly. Even if you are a phony,
you have to be a bit bonkers to keep repeating the same nonsense over and
over knowing that i accept what you push. That would make you
nothing but a looney annoyance troll.
i changed your us to i ,
because when you say us you include me and ,
you have no idea what i accept
Lucifer Morningstar
2018-06-12 06:58:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by %
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
You seem to know God rather well so you must not have a
thinking mind.
I will take that as a compliment. Knowing without thinking and
understanding without learning is in fact a wonderful experience.
You must realize that you sound like a lunatic. You sound like a braindead empty shell waiting for someone or something to fill you up since you can't
do this on your own. Don't bother repeating all your regular garbage. It's
all been said by you pointlessly and repeatedly. Even if you are a phony,
you have to be a bit bonkers to keep repeating the same nonsense over and
over knowing that i accept what you push. That would make you
nothing but a looney annoyance troll.
i changed your us to i ,
because when you say us you include me and ,
you have no idea what i accept
I changed your i to I ,
because this newsgroup is for English speaking.
aaa
2018-06-12 15:38:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
You seem to know God rather well so you must not have a
thinking mind.
I will take that as a compliment. Knowing without thinking and
understanding without learning is in fact a wonderful experience.
You must realize that you sound like a lunatic. You sound like a braindead empty shell waiting for someone or something to fill you up since you can't
do this on your own. Don't bother repeating all your regular garbage. It's
all been said by you pointlessly and repeatedly. Even if you are a phony,
you have to be a bit bonkers to keep repeating the same nonsense over and
over knowing that none of us accept what you push. That would make you
nothing but a looney annoyance troll.
I'm sorry you don't really understand my actual point. It must be
impossible for you to imagine the experience you have never had before.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
duke
2018-06-12 17:28:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:17:59 -0700 (PDT), "hypatiab7(hypatiab7)"
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
You seem to know God rather well so you must not have a
thinking mind.
I will take that as a compliment. Knowing without thinking and
understanding without learning is in fact a wonderful experience.
You must realize that you sound like a lunatic. You sound like a braindead empty shell waiting for someone or something to fill you up since you can't
do this on your own. Don't bother repeating all your regular garbage. It's
all been said by you pointlessly and repeatedly. Even if you are a phony,
you have to be a bit bonkers to keep repeating the same nonsense over and
over knowing that none of us accept what you push. That would make you
nothing but a looney annoyance troll.
Whoa - what a statement by a fallen a way jewess.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Smiler
2018-06-09 22:39:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
You seem to know God rather well so you must not have a thinking mind.
Proven time and time again.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Kurt Nicklas
2018-06-11 00:55:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
You seem to know God rather well so you must not have a thinking mind.
Proven time and time again.
O! The irony!
hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
2018-06-12 01:04:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
Then why are we all thinking about and discussing the non-existent critter?
%
2018-06-12 01:19:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
Then why am i thinking about and discussing the non-existent critter?
i fixed your post ,
you don't know what i'm thinking ,
and when you say we you include me
Don Martin
2018-06-12 12:55:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:04:53 -0700 (PDT), "hypatiab7(hypatiab7)"
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
God is beyond the thinking mind.
Then why are we all thinking about and discussing the non-existent critter?
Because, while it may be beyond the thinking mind, it is right at home
in the Siamese neurons possessed by Triple Arsehole.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Smiler
2018-06-12 22:33:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Don Martin
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:04:53 -0700 (PDT), "hypatiab7(hypatiab7)"
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
God is beyond the thinking mind.
Then why are we all thinking about and discussing the non-existent critter?
Because, while it may be beyond the thinking mind, it is right at home
in the Siamese neurons possessed by Triple Arsehole.
Siamese neuron (singular), please.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Kevrob
2018-06-12 22:43:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by Don Martin
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:04:53 -0700 (PDT), "hypatiab7(hypatiab7)"
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
God is beyond the thinking mind.
Then why are we all thinking about and discussing the non-existent critter?
Because, while it may be beyond the thinking mind, it is right at home
in the Siamese neurons possessed by Triple Arsehole.
Siamese neuron (singular), please.
Must be PC, now! "Conjoined neurons."

Kevin R
aaa
2018-06-13 16:10:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
Then why are we all thinking about and discussing the non-existent critter?
Because we all need to learn the truth of God one way or the other.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Smiler
2018-06-14 00:16:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by aaa
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
Then why are we all thinking about and discussing the non-existent critter?
Because we all need to learn the truth of God one way or the other.
I have no such need. I already know the truth of your supposed god.
It's non-existent.
--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
aaa
2018-06-14 15:50:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Smiler
Post by aaa
Post by hypatiab7(hypatiab7)
Post by aaa
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Davej
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God.
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood and misery.
That's so unfair! God is an unthinking emotion.
Wrong. God is the unimaginable emotion.
God is beyond the thinking mind.
Then why are we all thinking about and discussing the non-existent critter?
Because we all need to learn the truth of God one way or the other.
I have no such need. I already know the truth of your supposed god.
It's non-existent.
That's still just your blind denial.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Yap Honghor
2018-06-08 02:24:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
Love? From a zombie?
Post by Andrew
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
Lies from theism is not only stupid, but also never smart!!!!!!!!!
Malte Runz
2018-06-08 08:18:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
"Love is in the air, in the whisper of the tree
Love is in the air, in the thunder of the sea
And I don't know if I'm just dreaming
Don't know if I feel safe
But it's something that I must believe in
And it's there when you call out my name"
~ John Paul Young
--
Malte Runz
Yap Honghor
2018-06-10 11:42:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
"Love is in the air, in the whisper of the tree
Love is in the air, in the thunder of the sea
And I don't know if I'm just dreaming
Don't know if I feel safe
But it's something that I must believe in
And it's there when you call out my name"
~ John Paul Young
--
Malte Runz
Love is strong between lovers, parents/children and human/pets.
You cannot show there is love between human and non-existent pixie....
Andrew
2018-06-11 00:37:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
"Love is in the air, in the whisper of the tree
Love is in the air, in the thunder of the sea
And I don't know if I'm just dreaming
Don't know if I feel safe
But it's something that I must believe in
And it's there when you call out my name"
~ John Paul Young
Love is strong between lovers, parents/children
and human/pets.You cannot show there is love
between human and non-existent pixie....
"God so loved the world that.............. "

The point here is that He (God) did
something about our situation here.

It has to do with love.
Yap Honghor
2018-06-11 01:43:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
"Love is in the air, in the whisper of the tree
Love is in the air, in the thunder of the sea
And I don't know if I'm just dreaming
Don't know if I feel safe
But it's something that I must believe in
And it's there when you call out my name"
~ John Paul Young
Love is strong between lovers, parents/children
and human/pets.You cannot show there is love
between human and non-existent pixie....
"God so loved the world that.............. "
This pure BULLSHIT, mean to con the fools!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by Andrew
The point here is that He (God) did
something about our situation here.
You can't prove anything you just said.
Post by Andrew
It has to do with love.
Why does a non-existent pixie anything to do with love???????
But, from your beloved con scripture, it was said that your pixie drown all human, and you said something about love?????????????????
Are you actually trolling in our AA?
Mitchell Holman
2018-06-11 02:38:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
"Love is in the air, in the whisper of the tree
Love is in the air, in the thunder of the sea
And I don't know if I'm just dreaming
Don't know if I feel safe
But it's something that I must believe in
And it's there when you call out my name"
~ John Paul Young
Love is strong between lovers, parents/children
and human/pets.You cannot show there is love
between human and non-existent pixie....
"God so loved the world that.............. "
The point here is that He (God) did
something about our situation here.
"Our situation" - that god caused?




Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie
who was his own father can make you live forever if
you eat his flesh and telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil
force from your soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake
to eat from a magical tree - yep, makes perfect sense.
%
2018-06-11 02:40:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew
Post by Yap Honghor
Post by Malte Runz
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
"Love is in the air, in the whisper of the tree
Love is in the air, in the thunder of the sea
And I don't know if I'm just dreaming
Don't know if I feel safe
But it's something that I must believe in
And it's there when you call out my name"
~ John Paul Young
Love is strong between lovers, parents/children
and human/pets.You cannot show there is love
between human and non-existent pixie....
"God so loved the world that.............. "
The point here is that He (God) did
something about our situation here.
"Our situation" - that god caused?
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie
who was his own father can make you live forever if
you eat his flesh and telepathecally tell him you
accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil
force from your soul that is present in humanity
because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake
to eat from a magical tree - yep, makes perfect sense.
at least that's what you believe happend
Cloud Hobbit
2018-06-11 05:12:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
"God so loved the world that.............. "


He drowned everything.
Sent bears to kill children.
Killed people for "offenses" committed 4 generations earlier.
Tortures people forever if the don't do as he says, all the while keeping such a low profile a person could reasonably argue that he doesn't exist.

What a guy.
Meteorite Debris
2018-06-08 13:41:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <pfc3il$vd$***@gioia.aioe.org>, ***@usa.net
says...
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
"Do not think I have come to send peace. I have not come to send peace
but to send a sword. I shall set son against father, daughter against
mother and daughter in law against mother in law. A man's worst foes
will be the members of his own household."

Matthew 10:34
Lucifer Morningstar
2018-06-09 00:06:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
Yes, God is an unthinking emotion.
We should all emulate God by committing genocide
and refusing to do good.
Michael Cole
2018-06-09 00:19:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
If God is love then dogs are godly.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-06-09 19:43:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
God's call to love.

Love me or I will kill you and then torture you for eternity.
Aetherius IV
2018-06-09 19:48:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 12:43:03 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
God's call to love.
Love me or I will kill you and then torture you for eternity.
Is this proof that God is actually a woman?
Andrew
2018-06-09 22:41:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
God's call to love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
Lucifer Morningstar
2018-06-10 03:29:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Andrew
Post by Cloud Hobbit
God's call to love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
Matthew 22:36-38 New International Version (NIV)

36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and
with all your soul and with all your mind.’
38 This is the first and greatest commandment.
Andrew
2018-06-11 00:38:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Lucifer Morningstar
Post by Andrew
Post by Cloud Hobbit
God's call to love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other,
because love comes from God. Everyone
who loves has become God's child. And so
everyone who loves knows God. Anyone
who does not love does not know God,
because God is love. ~ 1 John 4:7,8
Matthew 22:36-38 New International Version (NIV)
36 "Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?"
37 Jesus replied: "'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and
with all your soul and with all your mind.'
38 This is the first and greatest commandment.
"And when Jesus saw that he answered
discreetly, He said unto him, Thou art
not far from the kingdom of God."
~ Mark 12:34
Yap Honghor
2018-06-10 11:51:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Cloud Hobbit
God's call to love.
Love me or I will kill you and then torture you for eternity.
With such threat, no wonder so many Americans gave in.....
Gronk
2018-06-10 03:43:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Andrew wrote:
And if'n ya don't love, burn forever
Loading...