Post by Smiler Post by aaa Post by Smiler Post by aaa Post by Smiler Post by aaa Post by Yap Honghor Post by aaa Post by Andrew Post by Andrew
I'm a Christian, following God's call for love.
"Dear friends, we should love each other, because love comes
GAWD loves you and wants to exterminate you. He loves blood
If that is your belief, then you are _not_ an atheist.
Do you require the supporting quotes from the Old Testament?
I think you can find them yourself.
If it is your belief..as you have so indicated, then.......
- hide quoted text - you are _not_ an atheist.
If you believe that you're not very bright.
The way God is depicted in the bible makes his blood and misery
quote more accurate than the "God is all love" nonsense that
Christians like to claim.
You can't buy this kind of entertainment.
There is no "his blood and misery quote." It's all just his
misunderstanding and yours as well. As atheists, you obviously
lack the capacity to understand philosophy. Your scientific
thinking is counter-productive in understanding philosophy.
Science has not involved itself in philosophy which is just the
human general viewpoint of lives, environment, knowledge or other
matters...nothing to do with a pixie.
The Bible is a book of philosophy.
So you say. Now prove it.
There is nothing to prove. You only need to realize it. I don't have
to prove that water is water.
Another lame excuse for not providing any evidence.
My simple point is quite clear.
Post by Smiler Post by aaa Post by Smiler Post by aaa
If you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things written in the Bible based on your
provisional knowledge in science.
Likewise, if you agree that science should not involve itself in philosophy,
you should not judge things in science based on your lack of
knowledge of science.
I have no argument with science itself. I only have problem with
science when it involves itself in philosophy.
Science doesn't involve itself with philosophy, liar.
Then science should disown evolution because evolution is obviously a
philosophical theory of life.
Only obvious to you.
Post by aaa
Scientists should be honest about their
own ignorance and should stop using evolution as a convenient
ideological excuse for them to shy away from God.
What god? You have yet to show evidence that one exists.
If NiuNian disagrees with me, chances are, I'm right.
"Modern science" is just "natural philosophy" under a new
name. It became such an expansive field, with sub-fields
of its own (Physics, Geology, Astronomy, Chemistry, Biology,
etc) that people forget that it is a branch of the tree of
In another group, someone pointed out a job posting ad for a computer
science/information technology position: Ontologist.
Ontology is a subset of metaphysics, but, apparently, the
data wranglers borrowed the term a couple of decades ago for
IT types dealing with "...how such entities may be grouped,
related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according
to similarities and differences..."
So, there's also this, now:
So, philosophy and science continue to interact.
aaa, knowing nothing about either field, can STFU.