Gordon
2016-01-30 16:07:01 UTC
Super String - Membrane (SS-M) Theory is at present just a theory. It
has not and maybe never will be objectively proven. Yet, the
mathematics seems congruent with that which we do understand and may
eventually provide means for proving SS-M.
SS-M posits ten spatial and one temporal dimension, of which our
universe is a three dimensional part. Our time scale also spans all
these dimensions. Those other spatial dimensions, if they exist, may
be interwoven into our discernable space.
Think of a deck of cards with all the black cards just a bit more than
a Planck Length in thickness and all the red cards just a bit less
than a Planck Length in thickness. An atomic sized microbe moving
through this deck of cards could discern only the black cards and the
volume they occupy but could not discern the red cards although they
are interspersed uniformly between each black card.
Should we go on studying SS-M theory, even though it has not and
probably never will be objectively proven? Or, should we toss this and
all other unproven theories in the trash until someone else is able to
provide objective proof? Gordon
has not and maybe never will be objectively proven. Yet, the
mathematics seems congruent with that which we do understand and may
eventually provide means for proving SS-M.
SS-M posits ten spatial and one temporal dimension, of which our
universe is a three dimensional part. Our time scale also spans all
these dimensions. Those other spatial dimensions, if they exist, may
be interwoven into our discernable space.
Think of a deck of cards with all the black cards just a bit more than
a Planck Length in thickness and all the red cards just a bit less
than a Planck Length in thickness. An atomic sized microbe moving
through this deck of cards could discern only the black cards and the
volume they occupy but could not discern the red cards although they
are interspersed uniformly between each black card.
Should we go on studying SS-M theory, even though it has not and
probably never will be objectively proven? Or, should we toss this and
all other unproven theories in the trash until someone else is able to
provide objective proof? Gordon