On Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:31:18 -0600, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee Post by Malte Runz Post by firstname.lastname@example.org
WRONG. Creationism is based on the Book of Genesis tale, which is not quoted by ID.
The proven serially lying liar knows I said OLD EARTH creationism,
which still denies the sciences that religious loonies don't like and
sez goddidit instead.
Post by Malte Runz
What is "quoted by ID"?
The proven serially lying liar knows perfectly well that ID is old
Earth creationism rebranded with the pretence that their unevidenced
designer doesn't have to be the god they previously insisted did it
when they were OECs.
Even though its founders admitted that.
I just read about Behe's new book, "Darwin devolves". Why is that guy
so fixated on Darwin, who hasn't been an authority on evolution for
quite a while?
From DI's page on the book:
"Critically analyzing the latest research, Behe gives a sweeping tour
of how modern theories of evolution fall short and how the devolving
nature of Darwins mechanism limits them even further. If we are to
get a satisfactory answer to how the most complex, stunning life-forms
arose, its time to acknowledge the conclusion that only an
intelligent mind could have designed life."
I'll wait for it to come out on VHS.
Post by Christopher A. Lee Post by Malte Runz
And, maybe, instead telling me how ignorant I am and how stupid I am
in general, maybe you could simply explain what you're talking about.
ID simply isn't science. There is no research in it, it merely tries
to pick holes in objective science using all sorts of fallacies.
Behe's book sound like it's just a rehash of "Darwin's Black Box". I
bet there is not one single scientific study performed be Behe or any
of the other 'scientists' from Discovery Institute.