Discussion:
The meaning of life
Add Reply
a***@gmail.com
2018-10-26 16:43:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.

Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.

Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.

What gives your life meaning?

Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor

“The answers only lead to more questions”
Kevrob
2018-10-26 17:22:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor
“The answers only lead to more questions”
42, of course!

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
T***@aol.com
2018-10-26 17:39:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor
“The answers only lead to more questions”
42, of course!
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
1/c^4 = 0123456789. x 10^-42 time^4/space^4

and the golden rule:
he who has the gold makes the rules.
a***@gmail.com
2018-10-27 10:52:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor
“The answers only lead to more questions”
42, of course!
7!/5! = 42
6*6+6 = 42 - does this mean that the antichrist gives life meaning?

Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor

“Life is live”
Post by Kevrob
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2018-10-27 01:47:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor
“The answers only lead to more questions”
All meanings come from the within because God is the holder of all
knowledge to give meaning to everything. A life without God would be a
life without meaning.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
a***@gmail.com
2018-10-27 10:56:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor
“The answers only lead to more questions”
All meanings come from the within because God is the holder of all
knowledge to give meaning to everything. A life without God would be a
life without meaning.
Religion is a personal choice. Your religion may be Christianity. My religion is truth.

Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor

“Truth and freedom”
Post by aaa
--
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
aaa
2018-10-27 15:06:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late
Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows
the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in
your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of
life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using
that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Abhinav Lal Writer & Investor
“The answers only lead to more questions”
All meanings come from the within because God is the holder of all
knowledge to give meaning to everything. A life without God would
be a life without meaning.
Religion is a personal choice. Your religion may be Christianity. My
religion is truth.
I'm not talking about religion. I gave you my philosophical answer for a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
Abhinav Lal Writer & Investor
“Truth and freedom”
Post by aaa
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness,
intelligence, happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom,
and life itself.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-27 17:36:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.



https://www.cbsnews.com/news/woman-dies-after-contracting-flesh-eating-
bacteria-on-vacation-family-says/
aaa
2018-10-27 21:41:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think I have made my point clear enough.
Post by Mitchell Holman
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/woman-dies-after-contracting-flesh-eating-
bacteria-on-vacation-family-says/
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-10-27 23:07:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Post by aaa
I have made my point....
Not in the least. You declaim ridiculous positions,
but you never support them with anything but your
"spiritual understandings."
Post by aaa
... clear enough.
As clear as mud, frozen into tundra.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/woman-dies-after-contracting-flesh-eating-
bacteria-on-vacation-family-says/
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2018-10-28 03:04:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
I have made my point....
Not in the least. You declaim ridiculous positions,
but you never support them with anything but your
"spiritual understandings."
Why do you need them to be supported by anything other than themselves?
What exactly can you not understand?
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
... clear enough.
As clear as mud, frozen into tundra.
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/woman-dies-after-contracting-flesh-eating-
bacteria-on-vacation-family-says/
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-10-28 04:16:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.

2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
complicated than "I say so."

3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.

Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.

You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Michael Christ
2018-10-28 11:50:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
complicated than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Kevin, my friend, in my top five dickhead atheists whom I like. Stay
away from that aaa manipulative asshole devil deluded religionist, he's
a bona fide so-called christian, the scum of the earth!

Why? You say?? Those assholes place themselves in the holy place to
represent the Lord Jesus, and all they do is whore themselves to the
world and say it is okay as long as they keep repenting. Those pricks
bring an abominable testimony of the Lord Jesus...the number one good
guy of all time!







Michael Christ
aaa
2018-10-28 14:32:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
complicated than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Kevin, my friend, in my top five dickhead atheists whom I like. Stay
away from that aaa manipulative asshole devil deluded religionist, he's
a bona fide so-called christian, the scum of the earth!
Why? You say?? Those assholes place themselves in the holy place to
represent the Lord Jesus, and all they do is whore themselves to the
world and say it is okay as long as they keep repenting. Those pricks
bring an abominable testimony of the Lord Jesus...the number one good
guy of all time!
That is not true. I don't agree to keep repenting for the same sin over
and over, but I can't judge because circumstances are all different. I
can only assume it is genuine repentance despite the fact we might be
misled to sin once again. I presume all people are sincere to repent
their sins. Those with a cunning mind are only fooling themselves
because God can see everything happening in our mind.
Post by Michael Christ
Michael Christ
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Michael Christ
2018-10-28 22:00:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
     complicated than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
     who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
     hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
     knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.
     Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Kevin, my friend, in my top five dickhead atheists whom I like.  Stay
away from that aaa manipulative asshole devil deluded religionist, he's
a bona fide so-called christian, the scum of the earth!
Why?  You say??  Those assholes place themselves in the holy place to
represent the Lord Jesus, and all they do is whore themselves to the
world and say it is okay as long as they keep repenting.  Those pricks
bring an abominable testimony of the Lord Jesus...the number one good
guy of all time!
That is not true. I don't agree to keep repenting for the same sin over
and over, but I can't judge because circumstances are all different. I
can only assume it is genuine repentance despite the fact we might be
misled to sin once again.
Oh yeah, yeah baby its a win, win, Buddy! Yeah!!!! Wheeeeeeeeeeee!!!

Fuck off!!
Post by aaa
I presume all people are sincere to repent
their sins.
Repentance, God's standard of repentance is a once and for all event.

There is no lukewarm happy room!
Post by aaa
Those with a cunning mind are only fooling themselves
because God can see everything happening in our mind.
Oh yes, He can and you are easily seen.

Sin is not what you do, sinner whore, it is what you are, you
self-righteous creep!

Job 42:5  I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine
eye seeth thee.
Job 42:6  Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes.

But, you, asshole, rather like yourself and your little religious world
of determining your sins as per required.

Let me be clear again...

'You have made provision for sin'.

Now let me be even more clearer and clearererer...

Its all your heart, soul and mind, or fuck off!!!

Clear yet??






Michael Christ






Michael Christ







Michael Christ
aaa
2018-10-29 01:38:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by aaa
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
complicated than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Kevin, my friend, in my top five dickhead atheists whom I like. Stay
away from that aaa manipulative asshole devil deluded religionist, he's
a bona fide so-called christian, the scum of the earth!
Why? You say?? Those assholes place themselves in the holy place to
represent the Lord Jesus, and all they do is whore themselves to the
world and say it is okay as long as they keep repenting. Those pricks
bring an abominable testimony of the Lord Jesus...the number one good
guy of all time!
That is not true. I don't agree to keep repenting for the same sin
over and over, but I can't judge because circumstances are all
different. I can only assume it is genuine repentance despite the fact
we might be misled to sin once again.
Oh yeah, yeah baby its a win, win, Buddy! Yeah!!!! Wheeeeeeeeeeee!!!
Fuck off!!
Well, I hope you realize that I'm only talking about the true believers.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by aaa
I presume all people are sincere to repent their sins.
Repentance, God's standard of repentance is a once and for all event.
I disagree. I believe repentance is our only way to receive God's
forgiveness. It's always required on our journey to return to God.
Post by Michael Christ
There is no lukewarm happy room!
That has nothing to do with what I said.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by aaa
Those with a cunning mind are only fooling themselves because God can
see everything happening in our mind.
Oh yes, He can and you are easily seen.
I'm counting on that because I rely on God to show me my mistakes.
Post by Michael Christ
Sin is not what you do, sinner whore, it is what you are, you
self-righteous creep!
I actually agree, and it is something I absolutely don't want to be.
Post by Michael Christ
Job 42:5 I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine
eye seeth thee.
Job 42:6 Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes.
But, you, asshole, rather like yourself and your little religious world
of determining your sins as per required.
I don't know what you are talking about.
Post by Michael Christ
Let me be clear again...
'You have made provision for sin'.
You keep saying that, but you never explain why.
Post by Michael Christ
Now let me be even more clearer and clearererer...
Its all your heart, soul and mind, or fuck off!!!
Clear yet??
Not really.
Post by Michael Christ
Michael Christ
Michael Christ
Michael Christ
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
aaa
2018-10-28 14:41:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
complicated than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me. I only
need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
Post by Kevrob
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-10-29 05:37:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
complicated than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me. I only
need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.

Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one
does when making a logical argument as refutation,
you object to the characterization, backtrack,
emit more babble. shift your ground, etc.

One can't have a philosophical argument with someone
who equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology,"
won't admit that his "spiritual" views are, in fact,
religious, and pretends to be an idiot-savant with
the ability to be a conduit to the mind of his ghod,
due to physical injury.

You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Christopher A. Lee
2018-10-29 08:06:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
complicated than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me. I only
need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
We understand him perfectly - he's a raving loonie.
Post by Kevrob
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one
does when making a logical argument as refutation,
you object to the characterization, backtrack,
emit more babble. shift your ground, etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone
who equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology,"
won't admit that his "spiritual" views are, in fact,
religious, and pretends to be an idiot-savant with
the ability to be a conduit to the mind of his ghod,
due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
Which makes him one, anyway.
aaa
2018-10-29 15:25:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
complicated than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me. I only
need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one
does when making a logical argument as refutation,
you object to the characterization, backtrack,
emit more babble. shift your ground, etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone
who equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology,"
won't admit that his "spiritual" views are, in fact,
religious, and pretends to be an idiot-savant with
the ability to be a conduit to the mind of his ghod,
due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
In other words, you still refuse to understand me correctly. There is
nothing theological in what I said. You really should stop trying to
misinterpret what I said. It's not a good excuse.
Post by Kevrob
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-10-29 18:57:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more
complicated than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim,
who is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't
hold down a job, who is somehow a conduit for divine
knowledge, like a Russian Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence.
Why should any rational being take notice of your
blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me. I only
need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one
does when making a logical argument as refutation,
you object to the characterization, backtrack,
emit more babble. shift your ground, etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone
who equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology,"
won't admit that his "spiritual" views are, in fact,
religious, and pretends to be an idiot-savant with
the ability to be a conduit to the mind of his ghod,
due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
In other words, you still refuse to understand me correctly. There is
nothing theological in what I said.
[quote]

Theology (noun)

The study of the nature of God and religious belief.

"a theology degree"


1.1 Religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed.

"in Christian theology, God comes to be conceived as Father and Son"

count(able) noun "a willingness to tolerate new theologies"

[/quote] - https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/theology

[quote]

Theology is the critical study of the nature of the divine. It is taught
as an academic discipline, typically in universities and seminaries.

Theology is basically the study of deities or their scriptures in order
to discover what they have revealed about themselves. While theology
has turned into a secular field, religion followers still consider
theology as a discipline that helps them live and understand concepts
such as life, love and helps them lead a life of obedience to the
deities they follow or worship.

[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology
Post by aaa
You really should stop trying to
misinterpret what I said. It's not a good excuse.
What you consistently refer to as "philosophy," the rest of the world
calls theology. Theology uses philosphy as a tool: it aplies philosophy
to the "problem og ghod," but philosophy is much more than the study of
theology, which is considered but a branch of philosophy.

Your saying otherwise does not make it so.

Actually, your babble is relly only "folk widom," as it doesn't rise
to the standard of theological teaching at universities. Any university
trained theologian ought to be able to do philosophy, also. You would
be mincemeat in hands of any masters degree candidate.

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2018-10-30 02:01:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more complicated
than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim, who
is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't hold down a job,
who is somehow a conduit for divine knowledge, like a Russian
Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence. Why should
any rational being take notice of your blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me.
I only need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one does when making a
logical argument as refutation, you object to the
characterization, backtrack, emit more babble. shift your ground,
etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone who
equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology," won't admit that
his "spiritual" views are, in fact, religious, and pretends to be
an idiot-savant with the ability to be a conduit to the mind of
his ghod, due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
In other words, you still refuse to understand me correctly. There
is nothing theological in what I said.
[quote]
Theology (noun)
The study of the nature of God and religious belief.
"a theology degree"
1.1 Religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed.
"in Christian theology, God comes to be conceived as Father and Son"
count(able) noun "a willingness to tolerate new theologies"
[/quote] - https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/theology
[quote]
Theology is the critical study of the nature of the divine. It is
taught as an academic discipline, typically in universities and
seminaries.
Theology is basically the study of deities or their scriptures in
order to discover what they have revealed about themselves. While
theology has turned into a secular field, religion followers still
consider theology as a discipline that helps them live and understand
concepts such as life, love and helps them lead a life of obedience
to the deities they follow or worship.
[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology
I still disagree because my understanding of God is not limited by
religion. It's philosophical and spiritual instead.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
You really should stop trying to misinterpret what I said. It's not
a good excuse.
What you consistently refer to as "philosophy," the rest of the
world calls theology. Theology uses philosphy as a tool: it aplies
philosophy to the "problem og ghod," but philosophy is much more than
the study of theology, which is considered but a branch of
philosophy.
It's my intention to return philosophy back into God's hands completely.
There should be no philosophy without God.
Post by Kevrob
Your saying otherwise does not make it so.
Actually, your babble is relly only "folk widom," as it doesn't rise
to the standard of theological teaching at universities. Any
university trained theologian ought to be able to do philosophy,
also. You would be mincemeat in hands of any masters degree
candidate.
That's why I'm never interested in the abstract empty talk of modern
philosophy. I will only talk about the real philosophy as I understand it.
Post by Kevrob
--- Kevin R a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-10-30 03:18:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
It's my intention to return philosophy back into God's hands completely.
There should be no philosophy without God.
_____________________
Bullshit.

Philosophy concerns itself with everything in reality, not just God.

You're speaking of theology which is part of philosophy.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Again.
aaa
2018-10-30 16:54:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
It's my intention to return philosophy back into God's hands completely.
There should be no philosophy without God.
_____________________
Bullshit.
Philosophy concerns itself with everything in reality, not just God.
You're speaking of theology which is part of philosophy.
You don't know what you're talking about.
Again.
I doubt you know what you are talking about yourself since you have
obviously confused the physical reality as the philosophical reality. If
philosophy also takes the physical world as reality, it would not be
different from science. It would make Communism the same as Newtonian
physics.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-10-31 10:26:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
I doubt you know what you are talking about yourself since you have
obviously confused the physical reality as the philosophical reality.
___________________

More word salad making a non existent point.
There is no such thing as philosophical reality. There is just reality.
_________________________


If
philosophy also takes the physical world as reality, it would not be
different from science. It would make Communism the same as Newtonian
physics.
______________________

The physical world is the only world. You have shown no evidence for any other world, and you have yet to do anything but lie and pontificate with zero evidence to back anything up.

You're simply a troll with nothing better to do than make shit up, thinking you're funny when really you're just nuts.

Cells don't pray, you idiot.
aaa
2018-11-01 01:43:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I doubt you know what you are talking about yourself since you have
obviously confused the physical reality as the philosophical reality.
___________________
More word salad making a non existent point.
There is no such thing as philosophical reality. There is just reality.
_________________________
If
philosophy also takes the physical world as reality, it would not be
different from science. It would make Communism the same as Newtonian
physics.
______________________
The physical world is the only world. You have shown no evidence for any other world, and you have yet to do anything but lie and pontificate with zero evidence to back anything up.
You're simply a troll with nothing better to do than make shit up, thinking you're funny when really you're just nuts.
Cells don't pray, you idiot.
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no difference
between philosophy and science if they studied the same reality. Even
Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for philosophy to be
different from science.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-11-01 01:58:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I doubt you know what you are talking about yourself since you have
obviously confused the physical reality as the philosophical reality.
___________________
More word salad making a non existent point.
There is no such thing as philosophical reality. There is just
reality. _________________________
If
philosophy also takes the physical world as reality, it would not be
different from science. It would make Communism the same as Newtonian
physics.
______________________
The physical world is the only world. You have shown no evidence for
any other world, and you have yet to do anything but lie and
pontificate with zero evidence to back anything up.
You're simply a troll with nothing better to do than make shit up,
thinking you're funny when really you're just nuts.
Cells don't pray, you idiot.
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no
difference between philosophy and science if they studied the same
reality. Even Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for
philosophy to be different from science.
Show us what Aristotle said about that.
aaa
2018-11-01 16:08:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I doubt you know what you are talking about yourself since you have
obviously confused the physical reality as the philosophical reality.
___________________
More word salad making a non existent point.
There is no such thing as philosophical reality. There is just
reality. _________________________
If
philosophy also takes the physical world as reality, it would not be
different from science. It would make Communism the same as Newtonian
physics.
______________________
The physical world is the only world. You have shown no evidence for
any other world, and you have yet to do anything but lie and
pontificate with zero evidence to back anything up.
You're simply a troll with nothing better to do than make shit up,
thinking you're funny when really you're just nuts.
Cells don't pray, you idiot.
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no
difference between philosophy and science if they studied the same
reality. Even Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for
philosophy to be different from science.
Show us what Aristotle said about that.
Why?
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
m***@gmail.com
2018-11-01 17:01:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I doubt you know what you are talking about yourself since you have
obviously confused the physical reality as the philosophical reality.
___________________
More word salad making a non existent point.
There is no such thing as philosophical reality. There is just
reality. _________________________
If
philosophy also takes the physical world as reality, it would not be
different from science. It would make Communism the same as Newtonian
physics.
______________________
The physical world is the only world. You have shown no evidence for
any other world, and you have yet to do anything but lie and
pontificate with zero evidence to back anything up.
You're simply a troll with nothing better to do than make shit up,
thinking you're funny when really you're just nuts.
Cells don't pray, you idiot.
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no
difference between philosophy and science if they studied the same
reality. Even Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for
philosophy to be different from science.
Show us what Aristotle said about that.
Why?
Because you are merely name-dropping about things you know nothing about.
Your ignorance is legend.
Kevrob
2018-11-01 18:04:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I doubt you know what you are talking about yourself since you have
obviously confused the physical reality as the philosophical reality.
___________________
More word salad making a non existent point.
There is no such thing as philosophical reality. There is just
reality. _________________________
If
philosophy also takes the physical world as reality, it would not be
different from science. It would make Communism the same as Newtonian
physics.
______________________
The physical world is the only world. You have shown no evidence for
any other world, and you have yet to do anything but lie and
pontificate with zero evidence to back anything up.
You're simply a troll with nothing better to do than make shit up,
thinking you're funny when really you're just nuts.
Cells don't pray, you idiot.
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no
difference between philosophy and science if they studied the same
reality. Even Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for
philosophy to be different from science.
Show us what Aristotle said about that.
Why?
Because he who asserts has the burden to produce evidence.
Your "spiritual understandings" are not evidence.

Your attempts to shift the burden are laughable,
and right out of the Troll Handbook. Get lost.

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Cloud Hobbit
2018-11-01 09:37:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
aaa
- show quoted text -
Post by aaa
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no difference
between philosophy and science if they studied the same reality. Even
Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for philosophy to be
different from science.
_______________

In which of Aristotle's writings that you have not read, did you learn this?
Christopher A. Lee
2018-11-01 15:07:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 02:37:37 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
Post by Cloud Hobbit
aaa
- show quoted text -
Post by aaa
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no difference
between philosophy and science if they studied the same reality. Even
Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for philosophy to be
different from science.
_______________
In which of Aristotle's writings that you have not read, did you learn this?
That one.
aaa
2018-11-01 16:08:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
aaa
- show quoted text -
Post by aaa
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no difference
between philosophy and science if they studied the same reality. Even
Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for philosophy to be
different from science.
_______________
In which of Aristotle's writings that you have not read, did you learn this?
You are welcome to prove me wrong.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
m***@gmail.com
2018-11-01 17:08:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Cloud Hobbit
aaa
- show quoted text -
Post by aaa
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no difference
between philosophy and science if they studied the same reality. Even
Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for philosophy to be
different from science.
_______________
In which of Aristotle's writings that you have not read, did you learn this?
You are welcome to prove me wrong.
We already have several times. You avoid comment with weasel words and
weasel questions in a failed attempt to cover up your willing ignorance.
The only reason you're here is because no other newsgroups will pay
attention to you. You need us. We don't need you and your nonsense.
You've always been a pity troll. You NEED us, you poor, sad, pity troll.
m***@gmail.com
2018-11-01 17:09:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Cloud Hobbit
aaa
- show quoted text -
Post by aaa
You failed to address my actual point that there would be no difference
between philosophy and science if they studied the same reality. Even
Aristotle knew to make up a metaphysical reality for philosophy to be
different from science.
_______________
In which of Aristotle's writings that you have not read, did you learn this?
You are welcome to prove me wrong.
Consider it done - many times.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-11-01 18:15:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Cloud Hobbit
In which of Aristotle's writings that you have not read, did you learn this?
You are welcome to prove me wrong.
________________________

Which is was code for "I made it up."

You are wrong unless you provide evidence that Aristotle said What you claim from a philosopher you say you never read.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-10-30 03:21:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
That's why I'm never interested in the abstract empty talk of modern
philosophy. I will only talk about the real philosophy as I understand it.
_________________

Then you will be silent.
You don't understand it.

Philosophy was never in God's hands.
aaa
2018-10-30 16:55:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
That's why I'm never interested in the abstract empty talk of modern
philosophy. I will only talk about the real philosophy as I understand it.
_________________
Then you will be silent.
You don't understand it.
Philosophy was never in God's hands.
That's why modern philosophy is dead.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-10-31 00:49:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more complicated
than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim, who
is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't hold down a job,
who is somehow a conduit for divine knowledge, like a Russian
Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence. Why should
any rational being take notice of your blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me.
I only need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one does when making a
logical argument as refutation, you object to the
characterization, backtrack, emit more babble. shift your ground,
etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone who
equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology," won't admit that
his "spiritual" views are, in fact, religious, and pretends to be
an idiot-savant with the ability to be a conduit to the mind of
his ghod, due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
In other words, you still refuse to understand me correctly. There
is nothing theological in what I said.
[quote]
Theology (noun)
The study of the nature of God and religious belief.
"a theology degree"
1.1 Religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed.
"in Christian theology, God comes to be conceived as Father and Son"
count(able) noun "a willingness to tolerate new theologies"
[/quote] - https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/theology
[quote]
Theology is the critical study of the nature of the divine. It is
taught as an academic discipline, typically in universities and
seminaries.
Theology is basically the study of deities or their scriptures in
order to discover what they have revealed about themselves. While
theology has turned into a secular field, religion followers still
consider theology as a discipline that helps them live and understand
concepts such as life, love and helps them lead a life of obedience
to the deities they follow or worship.
[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology
I still disagree because my understanding of God is not limited by
religion.
If there's a ghod involved, it's religion: by definition
Post by aaa
It's philosophical ....
You haven't a clue what philosophy actually is.
Post by aaa
and spiritual instead.
"Spiritual" instead of "religious" is the great
wesel-word of the unchurched believer trying
to avoid criticism of religion going back thousands
of years. The "spirit" in spiritual is just religious
woo-woo repackaged: "old wine in new skins," though I
doubt you will get the reference. [It's in Luke, Ch 5]
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
You really should stop trying to misinterpret what I said. It's not
a good excuse.
What you consistently refer to as "philosophy," the rest of the
world calls theology. Theology uses philosphy as a tool: it aplies
philosophy to the "problem og ghod," but philosophy is much more than
the study of theology, which is considered but a branch of
philosophy.
It's my intention to return philosophy back into God's hands completely.
You would be incompetent for such a project. You might as well
turn the wheel back into the hands of Og, and get it ought of that
of Benz, Ford, Nissan, etc.
Post by aaa
There should be no philosophy without God.
Of course there should. If we have proper philosophy, we can ditch
the whole ghod-myth.
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Your saying otherwise does not make it so.
Actually, your babble is relly only "folk widom," as it doesn't rise
to the standard of theological teaching at universities. Any
university trained theologian ought to be able to do philosophy,
also. You would be mincemeat in hands of any masters degree
candidate.
That's why I'm never interested in the abstract empty talk of modern
philosophy. I will only talk about the real philosophy as I understand it.
Then, since you don't understand philosophy at all, may we depend
on your silence, or will you continue to prattle on about things
in total ignorance?

[Of course you won't shut up, insistently nuts, or ever-persistent
troll, it mnatters not.]

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2018-10-31 16:03:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more complicated
than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim, who
is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't hold down a job,
who is somehow a conduit for divine knowledge, like a Russian
Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence. Why should
any rational being take notice of your blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me.
I only need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one does when making a
logical argument as refutation, you object to the
characterization, backtrack, emit more babble. shift your ground,
etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone who
equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology," won't admit that
his "spiritual" views are, in fact, religious, and pretends to be
an idiot-savant with the ability to be a conduit to the mind of
his ghod, due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
In other words, you still refuse to understand me correctly. There
is nothing theological in what I said.
[quote]
Theology (noun)
The study of the nature of God and religious belief.
"a theology degree"
1.1 Religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed.
"in Christian theology, God comes to be conceived as Father and Son"
count(able) noun "a willingness to tolerate new theologies"
[/quote] - https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/theology
[quote]
Theology is the critical study of the nature of the divine. It is
taught as an academic discipline, typically in universities and
seminaries.
Theology is basically the study of deities or their scriptures in
order to discover what they have revealed about themselves. While
theology has turned into a secular field, religion followers still
consider theology as a discipline that helps them live and understand
concepts such as life, love and helps them lead a life of obedience
to the deities they follow or worship.
[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology
I still disagree because my understanding of God is not limited by
religion.
If there's a ghod involved, it's religion: by definition
Not necessarily. By definition, God is the God of philosophy because we
have only known God through philosophy. Philosophy is actually the
teaching of God.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
It's philosophical ....
You haven't a clue what philosophy actually is.
My explanation of philosophy should be better than what you can find in
books.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
and spiritual instead.
"Spiritual" instead of "religious" is the great
wesel-word of the unchurched believer trying
to avoid criticism of religion going back thousands
of years. The "spirit" in spiritual is just religious
woo-woo repackaged: "old wine in new skins," though I
doubt you will get the reference. [It's in Luke, Ch 5]
That's just your intentional misinterpretation.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
You really should stop trying to misinterpret what I said. It's not
a good excuse.
What you consistently refer to as "philosophy," the rest of the
world calls theology. Theology uses philosphy as a tool: it aplies
philosophy to the "problem og ghod," but philosophy is much more than
the study of theology, which is considered but a branch of
philosophy.
It's my intention to return philosophy back into God's hands completely.
You would be incompetent for such a project. You might as well
turn the wheel back into the hands of Og, and get it ought of that
of Benz, Ford, Nissan, etc.
I believe I have already done that.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
There should be no philosophy without God.
Of course there should. If we have proper philosophy, we can ditch
the whole ghod-myth.
Not according to the fact on the ground. According to the fact on the
ground, the Godless modern philosophy is also meaningless and useless.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Your saying otherwise does not make it so.
Actually, your babble is relly only "folk widom," as it doesn't rise
to the standard of theological teaching at universities. Any
university trained theologian ought to be able to do philosophy,
also. You would be mincemeat in hands of any masters degree
candidate.
That's why I'm never interested in the abstract empty talk of modern
philosophy. I will only talk about the real philosophy as I understand it.
Then, since you don't understand philosophy at all, may we depend
on your silence, or will you continue to prattle on about things
in total ignorance?
[Of course you won't shut up, insistently nuts, or ever-persistent
troll, it mnatters not.]
Because I do understand philosophy without the need to read it beforehand.
Post by Kevrob
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-31 18:09:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more complicated
than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim, who
is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't hold down a job,
who is somehow a conduit for divine knowledge, like a Russian
Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence. Why should
any rational being take notice of your blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me.
I only need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one does when making a
logical argument as refutation, you object to the
characterization, backtrack, emit more babble. shift your ground,
etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone who
equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology," won't admit that
his "spiritual" views are, in fact, religious, and pretends to be
an idiot-savant with the ability to be a conduit to the mind of
his ghod, due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
In other words, you still refuse to understand me correctly. There
is nothing theological in what I said.
[quote]
Theology (noun)
The study of the nature of God and religious belief.
"a theology degree"
1.1 Religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed.
"in Christian theology, God comes to be conceived as Father and Son"
count(able) noun "a willingness to tolerate new theologies"
[/quote] - https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/theology
[quote]
Theology is the critical study of the nature of the divine. It is
taught as an academic discipline, typically in universities and
seminaries.
Theology is basically the study of deities or their scriptures in
order to discover what they have revealed about themselves. While
theology has turned into a secular field, religion followers still
consider theology as a discipline that helps them live and
understand concepts such as life, love and helps them lead a life
of obedience to the deities they follow or worship.
[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology
I still disagree because my understanding of God is not limited by
religion.
If there's a ghod involved, it's religion: by definition
Not necessarily. By definition, God is the God of philosophy because
we have only known God through philosophy. Philosophy is actually the
teaching of God.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
It's philosophical ....
You haven't a clue what philosophy actually is.
My explanation of philosophy should be better than what you can find
in books.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
and spiritual instead.
"Spiritual" instead of "religious" is the great
wesel-word of the unchurched believer trying
to avoid criticism of religion going back thousands
of years. The "spirit" in spiritual is just religious
woo-woo repackaged: "old wine in new skins," though I
doubt you will get the reference. [It's in Luke, Ch 5]
That's just your intentional misinterpretation.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
You really should stop trying to misinterpret what I said. It's
not a good excuse.
What you consistently refer to as "philosophy," the rest of the
world calls theology. Theology uses philosphy as a tool: it aplies
philosophy to the "problem og ghod," but philosophy is much more
than the study of theology, which is considered but a branch of
philosophy.
It's my intention to return philosophy back into God's hands
completely.
You would be incompetent for such a project. You might as well
turn the wheel back into the hands of Og, and get it ought of that
of Benz, Ford, Nissan, etc.
I believe I have already done that.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
There should be no philosophy without God.
Of course there should. If we have proper philosophy, we can ditch
the whole ghod-myth.
Not according to the fact on the ground. According to the fact on the
ground, the Godless modern philosophy is also meaningless and useless.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Your saying otherwise does not make it so.
Actually, your babble is relly only "folk widom," as it doesn't
rise to the standard of theological teaching at universities. Any
university trained theologian ought to be able to do philosophy,
also. You would be mincemeat in hands of any masters degree
candidate.
That's why I'm never interested in the abstract empty talk of modern
philosophy. I will only talk about the real philosophy as I
understand it.
Then, since you don't understand philosophy at all, may we depend
on your silence, or will you continue to prattle on about things
in total ignorance?
[Of course you won't shut up, insistently nuts, or ever-persistent
troll, it mnatters not.]
Because I do understand philosophy without the need to read it
beforehand.
In sum:

You understand philosophy without reading
any philosophy books.

You understand evolution without reading
any evolution books.

You understand the Bible without reading
any Bible books.

You understand history without reading
any history books.

Are we leaving out anything?
aaa
2018-11-01 01:15:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more complicated
than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim, who
is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't hold down a job,
who is somehow a conduit for divine knowledge, like a Russian
Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence. Why should
any rational being take notice of your blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me.
I only need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one does when making a
logical argument as refutation, you object to the
characterization, backtrack, emit more babble. shift your ground,
etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone who
equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology," won't admit that
his "spiritual" views are, in fact, religious, and pretends to be
an idiot-savant with the ability to be a conduit to the mind of
his ghod, due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
In other words, you still refuse to understand me correctly. There
is nothing theological in what I said.
[quote]
Theology (noun)
The study of the nature of God and religious belief.
"a theology degree"
1.1 Religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed.
"in Christian theology, God comes to be conceived as Father and Son"
count(able) noun "a willingness to tolerate new theologies"
[/quote] - https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/theology
[quote]
Theology is the critical study of the nature of the divine. It is
taught as an academic discipline, typically in universities and
seminaries.
Theology is basically the study of deities or their scriptures in
order to discover what they have revealed about themselves. While
theology has turned into a secular field, religion followers still
consider theology as a discipline that helps them live and
understand concepts such as life, love and helps them lead a life
of obedience to the deities they follow or worship.
[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology
I still disagree because my understanding of God is not limited by
religion.
If there's a ghod involved, it's religion: by definition
Not necessarily. By definition, God is the God of philosophy because
we have only known God through philosophy. Philosophy is actually the
teaching of God.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
It's philosophical ....
You haven't a clue what philosophy actually is.
My explanation of philosophy should be better than what you can find
in books.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
and spiritual instead.
"Spiritual" instead of "religious" is the great
wesel-word of the unchurched believer trying
to avoid criticism of religion going back thousands
of years. The "spirit" in spiritual is just religious
woo-woo repackaged: "old wine in new skins," though I
doubt you will get the reference. [It's in Luke, Ch 5]
That's just your intentional misinterpretation.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
You really should stop trying to misinterpret what I said. It's
not a good excuse.
What you consistently refer to as "philosophy," the rest of the
world calls theology. Theology uses philosphy as a tool: it aplies
philosophy to the "problem og ghod," but philosophy is much more
than the study of theology, which is considered but a branch of
philosophy.
It's my intention to return philosophy back into God's hands completely.
You would be incompetent for such a project. You might as well
turn the wheel back into the hands of Og, and get it ought of that
of Benz, Ford, Nissan, etc.
I believe I have already done that.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
There should be no philosophy without God.
Of course there should. If we have proper philosophy, we can ditch
the whole ghod-myth.
Not according to the fact on the ground. According to the fact on the
ground, the Godless modern philosophy is also meaningless and useless.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Your saying otherwise does not make it so.
Actually, your babble is relly only "folk widom," as it doesn't
rise to the standard of theological teaching at universities. Any
university trained theologian ought to be able to do philosophy,
also. You would be mincemeat in hands of any masters degree
candidate.
That's why I'm never interested in the abstract empty talk of modern
philosophy. I will only talk about the real philosophy as I
understand it.
Then, since you don't understand philosophy at all, may we depend
on your silence, or will you continue to prattle on about things
in total ignorance?
[Of course you won't shut up, insistently nuts, or ever-persistent
troll, it mnatters not.]
Because I do understand philosophy without the need to read it beforehand.
You understand philosophy without reading
any philosophy books.
You understand evolution without reading
any evolution books.
You understand the Bible without reading
any Bible books.
You understand history without reading
any history books.
Are we leaving out anything?
What's the problem?
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
zencycle
2018-11-01 13:40:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
You understand philosophy without reading
any philosophy books.
You understand evolution without reading
any evolution books.
You understand the Bible without reading
any Bible books.
You understand history without reading
any history books.
Are we leaving out anything?
What's the problem?
I think that answer makes it abundantly clear.
aaa
2018-11-01 16:10:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by zencycle
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
You understand philosophy without reading
any philosophy books.
You understand evolution without reading
any evolution books.
You understand the Bible without reading
any Bible books.
You understand history without reading
any history books.
Are we leaving out anything?
What's the problem?
I think that answer makes it abundantly clear.
I'm just glad you can find nothing wrong in what I said so far.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
m***@gmail.com
2018-11-01 03:59:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more complicated
than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim, who
is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't hold down a job,
who is somehow a conduit for divine knowledge, like a Russian
Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence. Why should
any rational being take notice of your blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me.
I only need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one does when making a
logical argument as refutation, you object to the
characterization, backtrack, emit more babble. shift your ground,
etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone who
equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology," won't admit that
his "spiritual" views are, in fact, religious, and pretends to be
an idiot-savant with the ability to be a conduit to the mind of
his ghod, due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
In other words, you still refuse to understand me correctly. There
is nothing theological in what I said.
[quote]
Theology (noun)
The study of the nature of God and religious belief.
"a theology degree"
1.1 Religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed.
"in Christian theology, God comes to be conceived as Father and Son"
count(able) noun "a willingness to tolerate new theologies"
[/quote] - https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/theology
[quote]
Theology is the critical study of the nature of the divine. It is
taught as an academic discipline, typically in universities and
seminaries.
Theology is basically the study of deities or their scriptures in
order to discover what they have revealed about themselves. While
theology has turned into a secular field, religion followers still
consider theology as a discipline that helps them live and
understand concepts such as life, love and helps them lead a life
of obedience to the deities they follow or worship.
[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology
I still disagree because my understanding of God is not limited by
religion.
If there's a ghod involved, it's religion: by definition
Not necessarily. By definition, God is the God of philosophy because
we have only known God through philosophy. Philosophy is actually the
teaching of God.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
It's philosophical ....
You haven't a clue what philosophy actually is.
My explanation of philosophy should be better than what you can find
in books.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
and spiritual instead.
"Spiritual" instead of "religious" is the great
wesel-word of the unchurched believer trying
to avoid criticism of religion going back thousands
of years. The "spirit" in spiritual is just religious
woo-woo repackaged: "old wine in new skins," though I
doubt you will get the reference. [It's in Luke, Ch 5]
That's just your intentional misinterpretation.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
You really should stop trying to misinterpret what I said. It's
not a good excuse.
What you consistently refer to as "philosophy," the rest of the
world calls theology. Theology uses philosphy as a tool: it aplies
philosophy to the "problem og ghod," but philosophy is much more
than the study of theology, which is considered but a branch of
philosophy.
It's my intention to return philosophy back into God's hands completely.
You would be incompetent for such a project. You might as well
turn the wheel back into the hands of Og, and get it ought of that
of Benz, Ford, Nissan, etc.
I believe I have already done that.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
There should be no philosophy without God.
Of course there should. If we have proper philosophy, we can ditch
the whole ghod-myth.
Not according to the fact on the ground. According to the fact on the
ground, the Godless modern philosophy is also meaningless and useless.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Your saying otherwise does not make it so.
Actually, your babble is relly only "folk widom," as it doesn't
rise to the standard of theological teaching at universities. Any
university trained theologian ought to be able to do philosophy,
also. You would be mincemeat in hands of any masters degree
candidate.
That's why I'm never interested in the abstract empty talk of modern
philosophy. I will only talk about the real philosophy as I understand it.
Then, since you don't understand philosophy at all, may we depend
on your silence, or will you continue to prattle on about things
in total ignorance?
[Of course you won't shut up, insistently nuts, or ever-persistent
troll, it mnatters not.]
Because I do understand philosophy without the need to read it beforehand.
You understand philosophy without reading
any philosophy books.
You understand evolution without reading
any evolution books.
You understand the Bible without reading
any Bible books.
You understand history without reading
any history books.
Are we leaving out anything?
aaa understands nothing and nothing is what he preaches.
aaa
2018-11-01 16:11:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Why? What is there so difficult for you to understand?
1.) You spout arrant nonsense.
2.) You refuse to back it up with anything more complicated
than "I say so."
3.) You have created this legend of a head trauma victim, who
is so scrambled in the head that he couldn't hold down a job,
who is somehow a conduit for divine knowledge, like a Russian
Holy Fool.
Many of us don't buy it, and figure you for a Poe.
You either can't, or won't use logic and evidence. Why should
any rational being take notice of your blather at all?
You didn't answer my question. I don't need you to believe me.
I only need you to understand me. Why can't you understand me?
See reason 1.
Anytime anyone restates your positions, as one does when making a
logical argument as refutation, you object to the
characterization, backtrack, emit more babble. shift your ground,
etc.
One can't have a philosophical argument with someone who
equivocally defines "philosophy" as "theology," won't admit that
his "spiritual" views are, in fact, religious, and pretends to be
an idiot-savant with the ability to be a conduit to the mind of
his ghod, due to physical injury.
You are a Froot Loop, or are pretending to be one.
In other words, you still refuse to understand me correctly. There
is nothing theological in what I said.
[quote]
Theology (noun)
The study of the nature of God and religious belief.
"a theology degree"
1.1 Religious beliefs and theory when systematically developed.
"in Christian theology, God comes to be conceived as Father and Son"
count(able) noun "a willingness to tolerate new theologies"
[/quote] - https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/theology
[quote]
Theology is the critical study of the nature of the divine. It is
taught as an academic discipline, typically in universities and
seminaries.
Theology is basically the study of deities or their scriptures in
order to discover what they have revealed about themselves. While
theology has turned into a secular field, religion followers still
consider theology as a discipline that helps them live and
understand concepts such as life, love and helps them lead a life
of obedience to the deities they follow or worship.
[/quote] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology
I still disagree because my understanding of God is not limited by
religion.
If there's a ghod involved, it's religion: by definition
Not necessarily. By definition, God is the God of philosophy because
we have only known God through philosophy. Philosophy is actually the
teaching of God.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
It's philosophical ....
You haven't a clue what philosophy actually is.
My explanation of philosophy should be better than what you can find
in books.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
and spiritual instead.
"Spiritual" instead of "religious" is the great
wesel-word of the unchurched believer trying
to avoid criticism of religion going back thousands
of years. The "spirit" in spiritual is just religious
woo-woo repackaged: "old wine in new skins," though I
doubt you will get the reference. [It's in Luke, Ch 5]
That's just your intentional misinterpretation.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
You really should stop trying to misinterpret what I said. It's
not a good excuse.
What you consistently refer to as "philosophy," the rest of the
world calls theology. Theology uses philosphy as a tool: it aplies
philosophy to the "problem og ghod," but philosophy is much more
than the study of theology, which is considered but a branch of
philosophy.
It's my intention to return philosophy back into God's hands completely.
You would be incompetent for such a project. You might as well
turn the wheel back into the hands of Og, and get it ought of that
of Benz, Ford, Nissan, etc.
I believe I have already done that.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
There should be no philosophy without God.
Of course there should. If we have proper philosophy, we can ditch
the whole ghod-myth.
Not according to the fact on the ground. According to the fact on the
ground, the Godless modern philosophy is also meaningless and useless.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Your saying otherwise does not make it so.
Actually, your babble is relly only "folk widom," as it doesn't
rise to the standard of theological teaching at universities. Any
university trained theologian ought to be able to do philosophy,
also. You would be mincemeat in hands of any masters degree
candidate.
That's why I'm never interested in the abstract empty talk of modern
philosophy. I will only talk about the real philosophy as I understand it.
Then, since you don't understand philosophy at all, may we depend
on your silence, or will you continue to prattle on about things
in total ignorance?
[Of course you won't shut up, insistently nuts, or ever-persistent
troll, it mnatters not.]
Because I do understand philosophy without the need to read it beforehand.
You understand philosophy without reading
any philosophy books.
You understand evolution without reading
any evolution books.
You understand the Bible without reading
any Bible books.
You understand history without reading
any history books.
Are we leaving out anything?
aaa understands nothing and nothing is what he preaches.
False. My focus has always been on the truth of God.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-11-01 18:21:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
False. My focus has always been on the truth of God.
__________________

The truth is you're a liar and a troll.

You're welcome to prove me wrong.

Mitchell Holman
2018-10-28 14:01:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
You are welcome to prove him wrong.


"You are welcome to prove me wrong."
"aaa", Sept 10, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y9n7srcy
aaa
2018-10-28 20:27:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
You are welcome to prove him wrong.
I don't have to at this time. He needs to justify himself first, then he
can ask for such demand if I don't accept his logic.
Post by Mitchell Holman
"You are welcome to prove me wrong."
"aaa", Sept 10, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y9n7srcy
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-29 01:56:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
You are welcome to prove him wrong.
I don't have to at this time. He needs to justify himself first, then he
can ask for such demand if I don't accept his logic.
Since you never prove up your claims
why do you demand that others do so?






"I don't have to prove it. It's my logical conclusion"
"aaa", Sept 10, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/ychasohv
aaa
2018-10-29 15:27:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
You are welcome to prove him wrong.
I don't have to at this time. He needs to justify himself first, then he
can ask for such demand if I don't accept his logic.
Since you never prove up your claims
why do you demand that others do so?
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple logic
and common sense.
Post by Mitchell Holman
"I don't have to prove it. It's my logical conclusion"
"aaa", Sept 10, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/ychasohv
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-29 18:23:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center
of everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
You are welcome to prove him wrong.
I don't have to at this time. He needs to justify himself first,
then he can ask for such demand if I don't accept his logic.
Since you never prove up your claims
why do you demand that others do so?
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple
logic and common sense.
When claim something is a FACT then you
need to prove as fact, no just that it is
logical.

You claim bacteria can pray? Prove it.

You claim god invented the Abomb? Prove it.

You claim animals in the wild never suffer? Prove it.

And no, "it is just common sense" is not proof.
aaa
2018-10-30 02:06:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center
of everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
You are welcome to prove him wrong.
I don't have to at this time. He needs to justify himself first,
then he can ask for such demand if I don't accept his logic.
Since you never prove up your claims
why do you demand that others do so?
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple
logic and common sense.
When claim something is a FACT then you
need to prove as fact, no just that it is
logical.
You claim bacteria can pray? Prove it.
I have.
Post by Mitchell Holman
You claim god invented the Abomb? Prove it.
I have.
Post by Mitchell Holman
You claim animals in the wild never suffer? Prove it.
I have.
Post by Mitchell Holman
And no, "it is just common sense" is not proof.
I only made that statement after my simple explanations were ignored.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-30 03:10:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center
of everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
You are welcome to prove him wrong.
I don't have to at this time. He needs to justify himself first,
then he can ask for such demand if I don't accept his logic.
Since you never prove up your claims
why do you demand that others do so?
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple
logic and common sense.
When claim something is a FACT then you
need to prove as fact, no just that it is
logical.
You claim bacteria can pray? Prove it.
I have.
"It's my personal understanding" is not proof.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
You claim god invented the Abomb? Prove it.
I have.
"It's my personal understanding" is not proof.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
You claim animals in the wild never suffer? Prove it.
I have.
"It's my personal understanding" is not proof.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
And no, "it is just common sense" is not proof.
I only made that statement after my simple explanations were ignored.
"Simple explanations" are not proof.
%
2018-10-30 03:18:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the
center
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
of everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You
can
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
You are welcome to prove him wrong.
I don't have to at this time. He needs to justify himself first,
then he can ask for such demand if I don't accept his logic.
Since you never prove up your claims
why do you demand that others do so?
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple
logic and common sense.
When claim something is a FACT then you
need to prove as fact, no just that it is
logical.
You claim bacteria can pray? Prove it.
I have.
"It's my personal understanding" is not proof.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
You claim god invented the Abomb? Prove it.
I have.
"It's my personal understanding" is not proof.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
You claim animals in the wild never suffer? Prove it.
I have.
"It's my personal understanding" is not proof.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
And no, "it is just common sense" is not proof.
I only made that statement after my simple explanations were ignored.
"Simple explanations" are not proof.
nothing on usenet is proof
aaa
2018-10-30 16:58:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the
center
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
of everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You
can
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think
Error 1: no, I don't think that's what you are doing.
Prove it.
You are welcome to prove him wrong.
I don't have to at this time. He needs to justify himself first,
then he can ask for such demand if I don't accept his logic.
Since you never prove up your claims
why do you demand that others do so?
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple
logic and common sense.
When claim something is a FACT then you
need to prove as fact, no just that it is
logical.
You claim bacteria can pray? Prove it.
I have.
"It's my personal understanding" is not proof.
That's not what I said.
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
You claim god invented the Abomb? Prove it.
I have.
"It's my personal understanding" is not proof.
That's not what I said.
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
You claim animals in the wild never suffer? Prove it.
I have.
"It's my personal understanding" is not proof.
That's not what I said.
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
And no, "it is just common sense" is not proof.
I only made that statement after my simple explanations were ignored.
"Simple explanations" are not proof.
Yes, they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-10-29 19:12:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
aaa said:

I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple logic
and common sense.
But never any evidence.
Post by Mitchell Holman
"I don't have to prove it. It's my logical conclusion"
"aaa", Sept 10, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/ychasohv
aaa
2018-10-30 02:08:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple logic
and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
"I don't have to prove it. It's my logical conclusion"
"aaa", Sept 10, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/ychasohv
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-30 03:08:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple logic
and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
"How can a microbe make you sick?
It defies logic and common sense"
%
2018-10-30 03:10:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple logic
and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
"How can a microbe make you sick?
It defies logic and common sense"
it multiplies
aaa
2018-10-30 16:59:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple logic
and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
"How can a microbe make you sick?
It defies logic and common sense"
I don't know what you are talking about.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-30 18:16:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with simple
logic and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
"How can a microbe make you sick?
It defies logic and common sense"
I don't know what you are talking about.
That is because you are brain damaged.

Hint: a claim based on fact (bacteria
can pray) can be proven or disproven with
fact. Have bacteria been observed praying?
Show us the proof). Logic and common sense
are not the issue.
aaa
2018-10-30 19:56:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with
simple logic and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
"How can a microbe make you sick? It defies logic and common
sense"
I don't know what you are talking about.
That is because you are brain damaged.
That's not a good excuse for your failure in the discussion.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Hint: a claim based on fact (bacteria can pray) can be proven or
disproven with fact. Have bacteria been observed praying? Show us the
proof). Logic and common sense are not the issue.
I have explained this before. What's your reason to ask me again?
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-31 01:58:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with
simple logic and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
"How can a microbe make you sick? It defies logic and common
sense"
I don't know what you are talking about.
That is because you are brain damaged.
That's not a good excuse for your failure in the discussion.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Hint: a claim based on fact (bacteria can pray) can be proven or
disproven with fact. Have bacteria been observed praying? Show us the
proof). Logic and common sense are not the issue.
I have explained this before. What's your reason to ask me again?
You have never posted your proof.

And no, platitudes about "all life
seeks god" is not proof.
aaa
2018-10-31 16:06:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with
simple logic and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
"How can a microbe make you sick? It defies logic and common
sense"
I don't know what you are talking about.
That is because you are brain damaged.
That's not a good excuse for your failure in the discussion.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Hint: a claim based on fact (bacteria can pray) can be proven or
disproven with fact. Have bacteria been observed praying? Show us the
proof). Logic and common sense are not the issue.
I have explained this before. What's your reason to ask me again?
You have never posted your proof.
Yes, I have.
Post by Mitchell Holman
And no, platitudes about "all life
seeks god" is not proof.
My explanation should be better than that.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-31 18:10:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with
simple logic and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
"How can a microbe make you sick? It defies logic and common
sense"
I don't know what you are talking about.
That is because you are brain damaged.
That's not a good excuse for your failure in the discussion.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Hint: a claim based on fact (bacteria can pray) can be proven or
disproven with fact. Have bacteria been observed praying? Show us the
proof). Logic and common sense are not the issue.
I have explained this before. What's your reason to ask me again?
You have never posted your proof.
Yes, I have.
Not here you haven't. But humor us
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
And no, platitudes about "all life
seeks god" is not proof.
My explanation should be better than that.
What explanation is that?
aaa
2018-11-01 01:26:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I disagree. I try my best to support everything I say with
simple logic and common sense.
But never any evidence.
The simple logic and common sense are already evidence.
"How can a microbe make you sick? It defies logic and common
sense"
I don't know what you are talking about.
That is because you are brain damaged.
That's not a good excuse for your failure in the discussion.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Hint: a claim based on fact (bacteria can pray) can be proven or
disproven with fact. Have bacteria been observed praying? Show us
the
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
proof). Logic and common sense are not the issue.
I have explained this before. What's your reason to ask me again?
You have never posted your proof.
Yes, I have.
Not here you haven't. But humor us
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
And no, platitudes about "all life
seeks god" is not proof.
My explanation should be better than that.
What explanation is that?
The explanation is simple. God is the holder of all knowledge. In order
to develop antibiotic resistance, bacteria must rely on God to acquire
the necessary knowledge to accomplish a beneficial DNA change.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-11-01 01:57:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Hint: a claim based on fact (bacteria can pray) can be proven or
disproven with fact. Have bacteria been observed praying? Show us
the
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
proof). Logic and common sense are not the issue.
I have explained this before. What's your reason to ask me again?
You have never posted your proof.
Yes, I have.
Not here you haven't. But humor us
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
And no, platitudes about "all life
seeks god" is not proof.
My explanation should be better than that.
What explanation is that?
The explanation is simple. God is the holder of all knowledge.
Unproven supposition.
Post by aaa
In order
to develop antibiotic resistance, bacteria must rely on God to acquire
the necessary knowledge to accomplish a beneficial DNA change.
Unproven supposition.

See? I told you you have no proof.
aaa
2018-11-01 16:13:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Hint: a claim based on fact (bacteria can pray) can be proven or
disproven with fact. Have bacteria been observed praying? Show us
the
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
proof). Logic and common sense are not the issue.
I have explained this before. What's your reason to ask me again?
You have never posted your proof.
Yes, I have.
Not here you haven't. But humor us
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
And no, platitudes about "all life
seeks god" is not proof.
My explanation should be better than that.
What explanation is that?
The explanation is simple. God is the holder of all knowledge.
Unproven supposition.
That's only according to your ignorant opinion.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
In order
to develop antibiotic resistance, bacteria must rely on God to acquire
the necessary knowledge to accomplish a beneficial DNA change.
Unproven supposition.
See? I told you you have no proof.
No, it's perfect logic.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-28 01:53:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think I have made my point clear enough.
The only point you have made is that your
claims are bad that you need others to find the
proof of them.





"It's your job to verify my claim."
"aaa", Sept 12 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y894y9by
aaa
2018-10-28 03:08:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think I have made my point clear enough.
The only point you have made is that your
claims are bad that you need others to find the
proof of them.
"It's your job to verify my claim."
"aaa", Sept 12 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y894y9by
No. I don't need you to prove it by verifying it. I was only asking you
to verify it so that you can benefit from it. My simple point should be
self-evident enough to everyone.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-10-28 04:46:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
No. I don't need you to prove it by verifying it.
_____________
Yes you do.
No special rules for retards.
________________

I was only asking you
to verify it so that you can benefit from it. My simple point should be
self-evident enough to everyone.
- show quoted text -
_____________________
Evidence of your insanity, You keep expecting gibberish to be profound.

We all tell you that you make no sense, but do you try to explain more clearly? No, it's the same old crap that makes sense to nobody.

Please don't try to make any more simple points. They just show you to be a simpleton.

You can't explain anything by making up your own definitions for words and then expecting us to know what you are talking about. You can't say things that are plainly untrue and expect us not to notice.

You come across as someone who has no clue about what you're saying, who ignores the fact that your explanations are incomprehensible gibberish, yet still imagines you have just given the Gettysburg Address.

If you weren't so full of shit, I could almost feel sorry for you.
But I don't.
aaa
2018-10-28 14:08:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
No. I don't need you to prove it by verifying it.
_____________
Yes you do.
No special rules for retards.
________________
I was only asking you
to verify it so that you can benefit from it. My simple point should be
self-evident enough to everyone.
- show quoted text -
_____________________
Evidence of your insanity, You keep expecting gibberish to be profound.
We all tell you that you make no sense, but do you try to explain more clearly? No, it's the same old crap that makes sense to nobody.
Please don't try to make any more simple points. They just show you to be a simpleton.
You can't explain anything by making up your own definitions for words and then expecting us to know what you are talking about. You can't say things that are plainly untrue and expect us not to notice.
You come across as someone who has no clue about what you're saying, who ignores the fact that your explanations are incomprehensible gibberish, yet still imagines you have just given the Gettysburg Address.
If you weren't so full of shit, I could almost feel sorry for you.
But I don't.
Stop whining. You should try to understand something instead.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
aaa
2018-10-28 20:32:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think I have made my point clear enough.
The only point you have made is that your
claims are bad that you need others to find the
proof of them.
"It's your job to verify my claim."
"aaa", Sept 12 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y894y9by
No. I don't need you to prove it by verifying it. I was only asking
you to verify it so that you can benefit from it. My simple point
should be self-evident enough to everyone.
#3 on our list, I see.
So?
Why do you call them evasions? Because you simply can't understand any
of them no matter how hard you try?
1) "Figure it out yourself."
2) "It is just common sense"
3) "It is self-evident"
4) "It is in my sig line"
5) "You know the Bible, look it up yourself"
6) "I already posted it".
7) "It is my psrsonal understanding".
8) "It is your job to verify my claim"
9) "You are welcome to prove me wrong."
10) "It is already a fact so it dosn't
need to be proven."
11) "I don't need to prove it, you just
need to realize it"
13) "The proof is found in your own heart.
You don't need to ask me for it."
14) "That's something you have to find out
for yourself"
15) "I made my point"
16) "Sorry, I don't have to debate web links"
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Mitchell Holman
2018-10-29 01:54:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think I have made my point clear enough.
The only point you have made is that your
claims are bad that you need others to find the
proof of them.
"It's your job to verify my claim."
"aaa", Sept 12 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y894y9by
No. I don't need you to prove it by verifying it. I was only asking
you to verify it so that you can benefit from it. My simple point
should be self-evident enough to everyone.
#3 on our list, I see.
So?
Why do you call them evasions?
Because you never prove up any of your
bizarre claims. No duh.
Post by aaa
Because you simply can't understand any
of them no matter how hard you try?
1) "Figure it out yourself."
2) "It is just common sense"
3) "It is self-evident"
4) "It is in my sig line"
5) "You know the Bible, look it up yourself"
6) "I already posted it".
7) "It is my psrsonal understanding".
8) "It is your job to verify my claim"
9) "You are welcome to prove me wrong."
10) "It is already a fact so it dosn't
need to be proven."
11) "I don't need to prove it, you just
need to realize it"
13) "The proof is found in your own heart.
You don't need to ask me for it."
14) "That's something you have to find out
for yourself"
15) "I made my point"
16) "Sorry, I don't have to debate web links"
aaa
2018-10-29 15:34:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
a
philosophical question. God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life. It's a fact proven by life itself. You can
realize the existence of God simply by observing life.
So one can realize the existence of god by
observing the "life" of a flesh eating bacteria
as it slowly kills a woman.
I think I have made my point clear enough.
The only point you have made is that your
claims are bad that you need others to find the
proof of them.
"It's your job to verify my claim."
"aaa", Sept 12 2018
http://tinyurl.com/y894y9by
No. I don't need you to prove it by verifying it. I was only asking
you to verify it so that you can benefit from it. My simple point
should be self-evident enough to everyone.
#3 on our list, I see.
So?
Why do you call them evasions?
Because you never prove up any of your
bizarre claims. No duh.
If it's already simple logic and common sense, what more do you need to
be proven? If I state that 1+1=2, do you consider it my evasion as well?
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Because you simply can't understand any
of them no matter how hard you try?
1) "Figure it out yourself."
2) "It is just common sense"
3) "It is self-evident"
4) "It is in my sig line"
5) "You know the Bible, look it up yourself"
6) "I already posted it".
7) "It is my psrsonal understanding".
8) "It is your job to verify my claim"
9) "You are welcome to prove me wrong."
10) "It is already a fact so it dosn't
need to be proven."
11) "I don't need to prove it, you just
need to realize it"
13) "The proof is found in your own heart.
You don't need to ask me for it."
14) "That's something you have to find out
for yourself"
15) "I made my point"
16) "Sorry, I don't have to debate web links"
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-10-29 19:07:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Why do you call them evasions?
Because you never prove up any of your
bizarre claims. No duh.
If it's already simple logic and common sense, what more do you need to
be proven? If I state that 1+1=2, do you consider it my evasion as well?
There are circumstances where "1 + 1" = "10"

It depoends on premises.

We generally don't accept yours.

BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Because you simply can't understand any
of them no matter how hard you try?
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2018-10-30 02:11:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Why do you call them evasions?
Because you never prove up any of your
bizarre claims. No duh.
If it's already simple logic and common sense, what more do you need to
be proven? If I state that 1+1=2, do you consider it my evasion as well?
There are circumstances where "1 + 1" = "10"
It depoends on premises.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
Post by Kevrob
We generally don't accept yours.
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Because you simply can't understand any
of them no matter how hard you try?
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-10-31 00:53:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
My mistake. I had the quote of the original post
collapsed, until I replied, and forgot that it did
open.

That was me, admitting to a mistake. You should try it some time.

As in:

"Oh, was I posting off-charter? I'm sorry, won't happen again.
I'll post again after I've read the FAQ and understand the norms
of the newsgroup!"

Fat chance of that.

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2018-10-31 16:11:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
My mistake. I had the quote of the original post
collapsed, until I replied, and forgot that it did
open.
That was me, admitting to a mistake. You should try it some time.
"Oh, was I posting off-charter? I'm sorry, won't happen again.
I'll post again after I've read the FAQ and understand the norms
of the newsgroup!"
Fat chance of that.
That's because it's not off-charter. I'm showing the evidence of God to
prove the mistake of atheism.
Post by Kevrob
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-10-31 16:52:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
My mistake. I had the quote of the original post
collapsed, until I replied, and forgot that it did
open.
That was me, admitting to a mistake. You should try it some time.
"Oh, was I posting off-charter? I'm sorry, won't happen again.
I'll post again after I've read the FAQ and understand the norms
of the newsgroup!"
Fat chance of that.
That's because it's not off-charter. I'm showing the evidence of God to
prove the mistake of atheism.
You are proselytizing for your ghod:

[quote]

The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information

1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.

[/quote] - http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq

You are off-charter when you do that.

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2018-11-01 01:30:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
My mistake. I had the quote of the original post
collapsed, until I replied, and forgot that it did
open.
That was me, admitting to a mistake. You should try it some time.
"Oh, was I posting off-charter? I'm sorry, won't happen again.
I'll post again after I've read the FAQ and understand the norms
of the newsgroup!"
Fat chance of that.
That's because it's not off-charter. I'm showing the evidence of God to
prove the mistake of atheism.
By showing the mistake of atheism, yes.
Post by Kevrob
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote] - http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
You are off-charter when you do that.
I'm exposing the mistake of atheism. There is nothing wrong about that.
Post by Kevrob
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-11-01 02:56:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
My mistake. I had the quote of the original post
collapsed, until I replied, and forgot that it did
open.
That was me, admitting to a mistake. You should try it some time.
"Oh, was I posting off-charter? I'm sorry, won't happen again.
I'll post again after I've read the FAQ and understand the norms
of the newsgroup!"
Fat chance of that.
That's because it's not off-charter. I'm showing the evidence of God to
prove the mistake of atheism.
By showing the mistake of atheism, yes.
Post by Kevrob
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote] - http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
You are off-charter when you do that.
I'm exposing the mistake of atheism. There is nothing wrong about that.
It's not about what YOU think is right or
wrong. If yo want to be treated seriously
in a newsgroup, you follow its charter, or
you don't post there.

I don't visit religious newsgroups and try to disabuse
the participants of faith in their ghodz. That behavior
is ou of place there. It would be impolite and insulting,
and might violate the terms of service of my ISP and the
posting software I use.

You seem to be using Eternal September, unless you have
spoofed your headers.

[quote]

Netiquette

Most hierarchies of Usenet have their own netiquette and guidelines.
Users should pay attention to the relevant policies.

[/quote] E-S terms of service

http://www.eternal-september.org/index.php?showpage=terms

So, you agreed to those terms, then break them as you please,
either because the knock on your noggin has convinced you that
you can do no wrong, or because you are a lying Poe no one could
trust to keep his or her word.

The idea of a head trauma victim so distressed he can't hold
down a job, but can spoof headers makes me wonder.

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2018-11-01 16:17:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
My mistake. I had the quote of the original post
collapsed, until I replied, and forgot that it did
open.
That was me, admitting to a mistake. You should try it some time.
"Oh, was I posting off-charter? I'm sorry, won't happen again.
I'll post again after I've read the FAQ and understand the norms
of the newsgroup!"
Fat chance of that.
That's because it's not off-charter. I'm showing the evidence of God to
prove the mistake of atheism.
By showing the mistake of atheism, yes.
Post by Kevrob
[quote]
The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information
1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be treated as what they are.
[/quote] - http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq
You are off-charter when you do that.
I'm exposing the mistake of atheism. There is nothing wrong about that.
It's not about what YOU think is right or
wrong. If yo want to be treated seriously
in a newsgroup, you follow its charter, or
you don't post there.
I don't visit religious newsgroups and try to disabuse
the participants of faith in their ghodz. That behavior
is ou of place there. It would be impolite and insulting,
and might violate the terms of service of my ISP and the
posting software I use.
You seem to be using Eternal September, unless you have
spoofed your headers.
[quote]
Netiquette
Most hierarchies of Usenet have their own netiquette and guidelines.
Users should pay attention to the relevant policies.
[/quote] E-S terms of service
http://www.eternal-september.org/index.php?showpage=terms
So, you agreed to those terms, then break them as you please,
either because the knock on your noggin has convinced you that
you can do no wrong, or because you are a lying Poe no one could
trust to keep his or her word.
The idea of a head trauma victim so distressed he can't hold
down a job, but can spoof headers makes me wonder.
Your rules don't apply because I do talk about atheism in an atheist group.
Post by Kevrob
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
m***@gmail.com
2018-11-01 03:57:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
My mistake. I had the quote of the original post
collapsed, until I replied, and forgot that it did
open.
That was me, admitting to a mistake. You should try it some time.
"Oh, was I posting off-charter? I'm sorry, won't happen again.
I'll post again after I've read the FAQ and understand the norms
of the newsgroup!"
Fat chance of that.
That's because it's not off-charter. I'm showing the evidence of God to
prove the mistake of atheism.
That is proselytizing and is off charter.
Christopher A. Lee
2018-11-01 15:20:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
My mistake. I had the quote of the original post
collapsed, until I replied, and forgot that it did
open.
That was me, admitting to a mistake. You should try it some time.
"Oh, was I posting off-charter? I'm sorry, won't happen again.
I'll post again after I've read the FAQ and understand the norms
of the newsgroup!"
Fat chance of that.
That's because it's not off-charter. I'm showing the evidence of God to
prove the mistake of atheism.
WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE OF WHAT FUCKING GOD?
Post by m***@gmail.com
That is proselytizing and is off charter.
We only ask for evidence to get these in-your-face loonies to put up
or shut up.

But they do neither.

When Gandhi was asked what he thought of Christianity, he said "I like
your Jesus. I do not like your Christians" because too many Christians
are like the loonies we get here - they push their beliefs where they
are neither wanted nor needed, tend to be sanctimonious hypocrites who
don't like up to claims that Christianity makes people better than
everybody else, etc.
aaa
2018-11-01 16:21:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
BTW: I'd want to excoriate you for the top-posting alone.
What top-posting?
My mistake. I had the quote of the original post
collapsed, until I replied, and forgot that it did
open.
That was me, admitting to a mistake. You should try it some time.
"Oh, was I posting off-charter? I'm sorry, won't happen again.
I'll post again after I've read the FAQ and understand the norms
of the newsgroup!"
Fat chance of that.
That's because it's not off-charter. I'm showing the evidence of God to
prove the mistake of atheism.
That is proselytizing and is off charter.
No. Proselytizing for the truth of God is the fundamental human right.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-10-28 04:32:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
I'm not talking about religion. I gave you my philosophical answer for a
philosophical question.
_______________
No you didn't, you just made up a lie.
___________________

God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life.
______________________
No, he doesn't. Most people don't think about God If they aren't in church.
__________________
It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
- show quoted text -
_____________________

No you can't. That's just more of your woo woo bullshit.

But then that's all you've ever had.
aaa
2018-10-28 14:04:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I'm not talking about religion. I gave you my philosophical answer for a
philosophical question.
_______________
No you didn't, you just made up a lie.
___________________
God exists in philosophy as the center of
everyone's life.
______________________
No, he doesn't. Most people don't think about God If they aren't in church.
__________________
It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
- show quoted text -
_____________________
No you can't. That's just more of your woo woo bullshit.
But then that's all you've ever had.
Your blind denial doesn't mean anything. It only proves your own ignorance.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-11-01 18:19:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
everyone's life.
______________________
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
No, he doesn't. Most people don't think about God If they aren't in church.
__________________
Post by aaa
It's a fact proven by life itself. You can realize the
existence of God simply by observing life.
- show quoted text -
_____________________
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
No you can't. That's just more of your woo woo bullshit.
But then that's all you've ever had.
Your blind denial doesn't mean anything. It only proves your own ignorance.
_________________________

Your making things up proves you're a liar.

Again.
duke
2018-10-28 22:43:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by a***@gmail.com
Post by aaa
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor
“The answers only lead to more questions”
All meanings come from the within because God is the holder of all
knowledge to give meaning to everything. A life without God would be a
life without meaning.
Religion is a personal choice. Your religion may be Christianity. My religion is truth.
Your is not a religion. Christianity is truth also.
Post by a***@gmail.com
Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor
“Truth and freedom”
Post by aaa
--
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****
Cloud Hobbit
2018-10-28 04:26:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
All meanings come from the within
___________________
No they don't.
___________________
Post by aaa
because God is the holder of all
knowledge
________________________
No he isn't. You just made that up.
_________________________
Post by aaa
to give meaning to everything. A life without God would be a
life without meaning.
_________________________

No it isn't. You just made that up.
aaa
2018-10-28 14:02:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
All meanings come from the within
___________________
No they don't.
___________________
Post by aaa
because God is the holder of all
knowledge
________________________
No he isn't. You just made that up.
_________________________
Post by aaa
to give meaning to everything. A life without God would be a
life without meaning.
_________________________
No it isn't. You just made that up.
Why?
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Cloud Hobbit
2018-10-28 23:58:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
aaa
- hide quoted text -
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
All meanings come from the within
___________________
No they don't.
___________________
Post by aaa
because God is the holder of all
knowledge
________________________
No he isn't. You just made that up.
_________________________
Post by aaa
to give meaning to everything. A life without God would be a
life without meaning.
_________________________
No it isn't. You just made that up.
Why?
- show quoted text -

How would I know what goes on in your damaged brain?

Nothing you say makes any kind of logical sense and you never provide anything to back up your ridiculous claims. You are the poster boy for Dunning Kruger.

You have lied, exaggerated, made things up and do not provide any evidence for the claims You make.
You have staked out your territory and claimed as your own. Unfortunately, it is a barren wasteland where reason can not penetrate. You're a raving lunatic wh wants us to believe that crap has value.

If you can't demonstrate with real evidence, that your claims are true then there is no reason for anyone to believe them.

Everyone recognizes your evasions and they indicate one thing very clearly, you have nothing and you know it.

If you had anything you would show it and rub it in our faces.

I don't know why you engage in this pretense of pretending to be the victim of brain trauma and acting like you think you are a prophet.

The only conclusion one can make after reading your posts is that you're nuts. Or pretending to be.

You failed miserably trying to sell your bullshit version of the second law.

You failed to understand philosophy.

You have nonstandard definitions for words that make what you say meaningless.

Cells don't pray.

Philosophy is not centered on God but on reality.

You're a loon or a Looney asshole. You for sure are full of shit.
aaa
2018-10-29 15:56:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
aaa
- hide quoted text -
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
All meanings come from the within
___________________
No they don't.
___________________
Post by aaa
because God is the holder of all
knowledge
________________________
No he isn't. You just made that up.
_________________________
Post by aaa
to give meaning to everything. A life without God would be a
life without meaning.
_________________________
No it isn't. You just made that up.
Why?
- show quoted text -
How would I know what goes on in your damaged brain?
Nothing you say makes any kind of logical sense and you never provide
anything to back up your ridiculous claims. You are the poster boy
for Dunning Kruger.
You have lied, exaggerated, made things up and do not provide any
evidence for the claims You make. You have staked out your territory
and claimed as your own. Unfortunately, it is a barren wasteland
where reason can not penetrate. You're a raving lunatic wh wants us
to believe that crap has value.
If you can't demonstrate with real evidence, that your claims are
true then there is no reason for anyone to believe them.
Everyone recognizes your evasions and they indicate one thing very
clearly, you have nothing and you know it.
If you had anything you would show it and rub it in our faces.
I don't know why you engage in this pretense of pretending to be the
victim of brain trauma and acting like you think you are a prophet.
The only conclusion one can make after reading your posts is that
you're nuts. Or pretending to be.
You failed miserably trying to sell your bullshit version of the second law.
You failed to understand philosophy.
You have nonstandard definitions for words that make what you say meaningless.
Cells don't pray.
Philosophy is not centered on God but on reality.
There is no difference since the real reality is God's spiritual reality
instead of the physical reality of the universe. The study of the
physical reality has a different name. It's called natural science
instead. Therefore, if you agree that philosophy studies reality, you
have to agree that philosophy must study the spiritual reality of God
instead of the physical reality of science. Otherwise, you would make
philosophy and science redundant.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You're a loon or a Looney asshole. You for sure are full of shit.
Sorry. Your lack of understanding isn't really my problem. It's yours.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
Kevrob
2018-10-29 19:04:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
aaa
- hide quoted text -
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
All meanings come from the within
___________________
No they don't.
___________________
Post by aaa
because God is the holder of all
knowledge
________________________
No he isn't. You just made that up.
_________________________
Post by aaa
to give meaning to everything. A life without God would be a
life without meaning.
_________________________
No it isn't. You just made that up.
Why?
- show quoted text -
How would I know what goes on in your damaged brain?
Nothing you say makes any kind of logical sense and you never provide
anything to back up your ridiculous claims. You are the poster boy
for Dunning Kruger.
You have lied, exaggerated, made things up and do not provide any
evidence for the claims You make. You have staked out your territory
and claimed as your own. Unfortunately, it is a barren wasteland
where reason can not penetrate. You're a raving lunatic wh wants us
to believe that crap has value.
If you can't demonstrate with real evidence, that your claims are
true then there is no reason for anyone to believe them.
Everyone recognizes your evasions and they indicate one thing very
clearly, you have nothing and you know it.
If you had anything you would show it and rub it in our faces.
I don't know why you engage in this pretense of pretending to be the
victim of brain trauma and acting like you think you are a prophet.
The only conclusion one can make after reading your posts is that
you're nuts. Or pretending to be.
You failed miserably trying to sell your bullshit version of the second law.
You failed to understand philosophy.
You have nonstandard definitions for words that make what you say meaningless.
Cells don't pray.
Philosophy is not centered on God but on reality.
There is no difference since the real reality is God's spiritual reality
instead of the physical reality of the universe. The study of the
physical reality has a different name. It's called natural science
instead.
Natural science, or as it used to be called, Natural Philosophy,
is also a branch of the larger disciple. You ever wonder why
scientists are awarded the PhD?
Post by aaa
Therefore, if you agree that philosophy studies reality, you
have to agree that philosophy must study the spiritual reality of God
Not in the slightest. Philosophy studies reality, but it also
makesd many conjectures about the theoretical, which may or
may not exist: in mathematics, in theology and in physics.
[Alternate universes and time travel may not be realities,
but they can still be discussed, if such discussion is useful,
until they are discarded as impossibilities.]

Ghos is not something that can be shown to be real, if it won't
interact with physical reality in a way that can be observed and
reecorded.
Post by aaa
instead of the physical reality of science. Otherwise, you would make
philosophy and science redundant.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You're a loon or a Looney asshole. You for sure are full of shit.
Sorry. Your lack of understanding isn't really my problem. It's yours.
Our only proble is that you troll here.

---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2018-10-30 02:54:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
aaa
- hide quoted text -
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
All meanings come from the within
___________________
No they don't.
___________________
Post by aaa
because God is the holder of all
knowledge
________________________
No he isn't. You just made that up.
_________________________
Post by aaa
to give meaning to everything. A life without God would be a
life without meaning.
_________________________
No it isn't. You just made that up.
Why?
- show quoted text -
How would I know what goes on in your damaged brain?
Nothing you say makes any kind of logical sense and you never provide
anything to back up your ridiculous claims. You are the poster boy
for Dunning Kruger.
You have lied, exaggerated, made things up and do not provide any
evidence for the claims You make. You have staked out your territory
and claimed as your own. Unfortunately, it is a barren wasteland
where reason can not penetrate. You're a raving lunatic wh wants us
to believe that crap has value.
If you can't demonstrate with real evidence, that your claims are
true then there is no reason for anyone to believe them.
Everyone recognizes your evasions and they indicate one thing very
clearly, you have nothing and you know it.
If you had anything you would show it and rub it in our faces.
I don't know why you engage in this pretense of pretending to be the
victim of brain trauma and acting like you think you are a prophet.
The only conclusion one can make after reading your posts is that
you're nuts. Or pretending to be.
You failed miserably trying to sell your bullshit version of the second law.
You failed to understand philosophy.
You have nonstandard definitions for words that make what you say meaningless.
Cells don't pray.
Philosophy is not centered on God but on reality.
There is no difference since the real reality is God's spiritual reality
instead of the physical reality of the universe. The study of the
physical reality has a different name. It's called natural science
instead.
Natural science, or as it used to be called, Natural Philosophy,
is also a branch of the larger disciple. You ever wonder why
scientists are awarded the PhD?
That's the most ridiculous thing happening in science. It's all because
of the utter stupidity and cluelessness of Aristotle and everyone after
him in all of human history. Philosophy and science study entirely
different things. There is nothing similar between philosophy and
science. The fight between science and religion is in fact the fight
between science and philosophy. A PhD is actually a title of Priesthood
to a nonbeliever. It's beyond blasphemy to the human knowledge in general.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Therefore, if you agree that philosophy studies reality, you
have to agree that philosophy must study the spiritual reality of God
Not in the slightest. Philosophy studies reality, but it also
makesd many conjectures about the theoretical, which may or
may not exist: in mathematics, in theology and in physics.
[Alternate universes and time travel may not be realities,
but they can still be discussed, if such discussion is useful,
until they are discarded as impossibilities.]
That's why you are wrong. The imaginary isn't the study of real
philosophy. Philosophy only started to play with imagination after it
had missed the real reality and truth of God. It's why the metaphysics
was born or manufactured.
Post by Kevrob
Ghos is not something that can be shown to be real, if it won't
interact with physical reality in a way that can be observed and
reecorded.
God's spiritual reality dominates everything in the physical illusion of
the universe.
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
instead of the physical reality of science. Otherwise, you would make
philosophy and science redundant.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
You're a loon or a Looney asshole. You for sure are full of shit.
Sorry. Your lack of understanding isn't really my problem. It's yours.
Our only proble is that you troll here.
Actually, your real problem is that I don't troll.
Post by Kevrob
---
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
m***@gmail.com
2018-10-27 10:11:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Reading and learning. There's always something new to learn. Due to
age and medical problems I can't do marches anymore, but I would like
to start going to science fiction conventions again. Hopefully, some
of my old friends and acquaintances from other states are still around.
G-D
2018-10-27 10:30:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor
“The answers only lead to more questions”
"Life is experiments. Conduct many."
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Life+is+experiments.+Conduct+many.%22
Robert Carnegie
2018-10-28 00:19:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by a***@gmail.com
I just watched a documentary on the meaning of life by the late Stephen Hawking. He started with the fact that our mind follows the laws of nature. Then he said, reality is only a model in your mind. He concluded that each person has his own meaning of life. He had no definite answer.
Meaning can come from your religious beliefs. Meaning can from taking care of people.
Meaning can come from better understanding the world, and using that understanding to make the world a better place.
What gives your life meaning?
Abhinav Lal
Writer & Investor
“The answers only lead to more questions”
The universe is here to be enjoyed. We are here to enjoy it.
Not to do so is a waste of it, and of us.
Loading...