Post by JWSPost by AndrewPost by John LockePost by JWSPost by BobIn Cells, Proofreading and Repair Testify to Intelligent Design and
Foresight
Rocks don't care if they break. The very concepts of proofreading and
repair imply accuracy for a purpose. In cells, complex multi-part
machines find errors and fix them. Is this not evidence of
intentionality and programming? As these new research papers show, the
machines involved show exquisite craftsmanship and efficient action to
keep other parts -- machines outside their own structural needs --
humming along.
https://tinyurl.com/y262nnpn
Show the intelligent designer.
Only an *Intelligent Designer* could possibly create
the biomolecular machines that proofread and repair
mistakes that occur during the DNA copying process
of cell division.
It should be easy to demonstrate you designer in these
"biomolecular machines"
Post by AndrewThese biomolecular machines have been in all living
things --since the Creation-- by our super intelligent
Creator.
I thought he was the Super DUPER Intelligent Creator.
This link describes how biochemistry works. Find god in
any one of these videos and report back here with your
demonstration of the Intelligent Designer.
https://tinyurl.com/ycyvkc83
Post by AndrewPost by John Locke..exactly ! ....they keep squawking about their "designer" but if they
if can't verify it,
Just did. Read it!
Where, liar.
Post by JWSPost by AndrewPost by John Lockethen they've got nothing more then religious nonsense.
The above is science, nothing to do with religion.
The liar doesn't know what science is.
Post by JWSPost by AndrewPost by John LockeIn any case, ID is a very dead concept, debunked
Do you have a non ID origin model for the existence
of the proofreading and repair mechanism that are in
all living things?
Sounds like a caricature used as one side of a false dichotomy whose
other half is the argument from ignorance..
Post by JWSPost by AndrewIf not, then ID has ~ not been debunked.
A deliberate, stupid, transparent lie. It has been debunked because
there is no way to determine it....
1. At that level there is nothing that wasn't designed, so there is no
way to determine design vs natural.
2. The other way would be to know enough about this hypothetical
designer to know what it did. Which can't be done because nobody has
ever demonstrated it, it is always their pre-existing religious belief
with the pretence that is isn't because they don't identify it.
Post by JWSPost by AndrewPost by John Lockeand rejected long ago by every credible university on the planet.
It may be rejected because of philosophical
bias, but definitely not by science.
Another of the lying liar's usual lies. What do they imagine when they
resort to these lies about those who live in and understand the real
world, in this case more than a century and a half of objective
research since Darwin.
Post by JWSPost by AndrewPost by John LockeBut the ID morons don't know it's dead.
Then show us the alternative. You can't.
Done over and over again, deliberate liar.
Post by JWShttps://tinyurl.com/ycyvkc83
They take no notice,and lie that it has never been provided, repeating
the same old refuted, debunked and rebutted bullshit, lying that it
has never been answered.
Post by JWSIdiot....IDism needs a pixie/creator/designer, right?????
It has the same principle and dogma as Christianity....enough said!!!!!!!!
The paranoid liar started yet another thread with confrontational lies
about people living in the world of reality.
Are there any honest, decent creationists? We've certainly never seen
any here or in talk.origins.
He's a perfect example of religious dementia at work.
How educated Americans should treat creationists, and the rest of the
educated world does...
https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/
[note the grammatical error]
Why does America put up with it instead of treating them as people
know what they are??