Discussion:
An utter disgrace.
(too old to reply)
Michael Christ
2020-02-05 08:16:22 UTC
Permalink
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.

Who voted her to be above that office??

Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.

You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!

But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.

God is always the truth...

(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.

(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.





Michael Christ

PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Rod B.
2020-02-05 13:41:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.

I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.

I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Patrick B
2020-02-05 14:35:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Pelosi is a dip shit. And she really stepped into it.

And Trump should watch his mouth on Twitter.

Trump’s budget would impose a national work requirement on Medicaid
enrollees, an idea that some states have adopted over the past year.
While the states include exceptions for family caregivers, the rules
vary widely and often are ambiguous, according to a 2018 study by the
advocacy group Justice in Aging.

In another change that could directly affect patients, the budget also
would expand the requirement that they get prior authorization for
Medicare fee-for-service treatment, an initiative the White House says
would save about $6 billion.

Tell me that you have never been called by "providers" who have called
and asked if you have a bad back, bad knees, and would like a free
brace trough Medicare. And all the free cell phones given out to
people who "NEED" to be able to contact their doctors?

Congress will approve few if any of Trump’s budget initiatives, though
he may try to implement some administratively.
Rod B.
2020-02-05 17:46:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Pelosi is a dip shit. And she really stepped into it.
She doesn't have to be likeable to be useful!
Post by Patrick B
And Trump should watch his mouth on Twitter.
You are dreaming Patrick, that will never happen.
Post by Patrick B
Trump’s budget would impose a national work requirement on Medicaid
enrollees, an idea that some states have adopted over the past year.
While the states include exceptions for family caregivers, the rules
vary widely and often are ambiguous, according to a 2018 study by the
advocacy group Justice in Aging.
In another change that could directly affect patients, the budget also
would expand the requirement that they get prior authorization for
Medicare fee-for-service treatment, an initiative the White House says
would save about $6 billion.
Tell me that you have never been called by "providers" who have called
and asked if you have a bad back, bad knees, and would like a free
brace trough Medicare. And all the free cell phones given out to
people who "NEED" to be able to contact their doctors?
Congress will approve few if any of Trump’s budget initiatives, though
he may try to implement some administratively.
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-05 18:46:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party
from passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of
Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice
this year to cut social security benefits to the elderly. They were
not able to do so thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in
office to stop their legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Pelosi is a dip shit. And she really stepped into it.
And Trump should watch his mouth on Twitter.
Trump’s budget would impose a national work requirement on Medicaid
enrollees, an idea that some states have adopted over the past year.
While the states include exceptions for family caregivers, the rules
vary widely and often are ambiguous, according to a 2018 study by the
advocacy group Justice in Aging.
In another change that could directly affect patients, the budget also
would expand the requirement that they get prior authorization for
Medicare fee-for-service treatment, an initiative the White House says
would save about $6 billion.
Tell me that you have never been called by "providers" who have called
and asked if you have a bad back, bad knees, and would like a free
brace trough Medicare. And all the free cell phones given out to
people who "NEED" to be able to contact their doctors?
Congress will approve few if any of Trump’s budget initiatives, though
he may try to implement some administratively.
The preceding has been plagiarized directly from:


https://www.forbes.com/sites/howardgleckman/2019/03/14/is-president-
trump-really-proposing-to-cut-medicare-by-845-billion/#238622181d07
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-06 02:33:07 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 12:46:07 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party
from passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of
Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice
this year to cut social security benefits to the elderly. They were
not able to do so thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in
office to stop their legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Pelosi is a dip shit. And she really stepped into it.
And Trump should watch his mouth on Twitter.
Trump’s budget would impose a national work requirement on Medicaid
enrollees, an idea that some states have adopted over the past year.
While the states include exceptions for family caregivers, the rules
vary widely and often are ambiguous, according to a 2018 study by the
advocacy group Justice in Aging.
In another change that could directly affect patients, the budget also
would expand the requirement that they get prior authorization for
Medicare fee-for-service treatment, an initiative the White House says
would save about $6 billion.
Tell me that you have never been called by "providers" who have called
and asked if you have a bad back, bad knees, and would like a free
brace trough Medicare. And all the free cell phones given out to
people who "NEED" to be able to contact their doctors?
Congress will approve few if any of Trump’s budget initiatives, though
he may try to implement some administratively.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/howardgleckman/2019/03/14/is-president-
trump-really-proposing-to-cut-medicare-by-845-billion/#238622181d07
OK.
Do you have a problem with the facts presented?
Do you havfe a problem with refusing to post
the source of comments?
Patrick B
2020-02-06 14:48:37 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 20:33:07 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Rod B.
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 12:46:07 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party
from passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of
Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice
this year to cut social security benefits to the elderly. They
were
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
not able to do so thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in
office to stop their legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will
continue
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Pelosi is a dip shit. And she really stepped into it.
And Trump should watch his mouth on Twitter.
Trump’s budget would impose a national work requirement on Medicaid
enrollees, an idea that some states have adopted over the past year.
While the states include exceptions for family caregivers, the rules
vary widely and often are ambiguous, according to a 2018 study by the
advocacy group Justice in Aging.
In another change that could directly affect patients, the budget
also
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
would expand the requirement that they get prior authorization for
Medicare fee-for-service treatment, an initiative the White House
says
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
would save about $6 billion.
Tell me that you have never been called by "providers" who have
called
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
and asked if you have a bad back, bad knees, and would like a free
brace trough Medicare. And all the free cell phones given out to
people who "NEED" to be able to contact their doctors?
Congress will approve few if any of Trump’s budget initiatives,
though
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
he may try to implement some administratively.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/howardgleckman/2019/03/14/is-president-
trump-really-proposing-to-cut-medicare-by-845-billion/#238622181d07
OK.
Do you have a problem with the facts presented?
Do you havfe a problem with refusing to post
the source of comments?
So you admit the facts were right.
You just don't like that I got them from someone else.
Is that about it?
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-06 14:56:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 20:33:07 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Rod B.
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 12:46:07 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party
from passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of
Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice
this year to cut social security benefits to the elderly. They
were
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
not able to do so thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in
office to stop their legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will
continue
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Pelosi is a dip shit. And she really stepped into it.
And Trump should watch his mouth on Twitter.
Trump’s budget would impose a national work requirement on Medicaid
enrollees, an idea that some states have adopted over the past year.
While the states include exceptions for family caregivers, the rules
vary widely and often are ambiguous, according to a 2018 study by the
advocacy group Justice in Aging.
In another change that could directly affect patients, the budget
also
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
would expand the requirement that they get prior authorization for
Medicare fee-for-service treatment, an initiative the White House
says
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
would save about $6 billion.
Tell me that you have never been called by "providers" who have
called
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
and asked if you have a bad back, bad knees, and would like a free
brace trough Medicare. And all the free cell phones given out to
people who "NEED" to be able to contact their doctors?
Congress will approve few if any of Trump’s budget initiatives,
though
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
he may try to implement some administratively.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/howardgleckman/2019/03/14/is-president-
trump-really-proposing-to-cut-medicare-by-845-billion/#238622181d07
OK.
Do you have a problem with the facts presented?
Do you havfe a problem with refusing to post
the source of comments?
So you admit the facts were right.
Hardly.
Post by Patrick B
You just don't like that I got them from someone else.
Is that about it?
Just tell us why you plagiarize so much.
Don Martin
2020-02-06 15:25:48 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:56:50 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Do you have a problem with refusing to post
the source of comments?
So you admit the facts were right.
Hardly.
Post by Patrick B
You just don't like that I got them from someone else.
Is that about it?
Just tell us why you plagiarize so much.
No original thoughts of his own has always been a problem for him.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
John Baker
2020-02-07 04:10:56 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:25:48 -0500, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:56:50 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Do you have a problem with refusing to post
the source of comments?
So you admit the facts were right.
Hardly.
Post by Patrick B
You just don't like that I got them from someone else.
Is that about it?
Just tell us why you plagiarize so much.
No original thoughts of his own has always been a problem for him.
Thoughts of any kind have always been a problem for him.







AA #1898
Giver of No Fucks
Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch
Don Martin
2020-02-07 13:43:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:25:48 -0500, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:56:50 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Do you have a problem with refusing to post
the source of comments?
So you admit the facts were right.
Hardly.
Post by Patrick B
You just don't like that I got them from someone else.
Is that about it?
Just tell us why you plagiarize so much.
No original thoughts of his own has always been a problem for him.
Thoughts of any kind have always been a problem for him.
Unwelcome intruders in an otherwise pristine skull.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Patrick B
2020-02-06 21:32:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
So you admit the facts were right.
Hardly.
Post by Patrick B
You just don't like that I got them from someone else.
Is that about it?
Just tell us why you plagiarize so much.
I always provide the best answers available.
Especially if they are absolutely true.
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-07 02:30:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
So you admit the facts were right.
Hardly.
Post by Patrick B
You just don't like that I got them from someone else.
Is that about it?
Just tell us why you plagiarize so much.
I always provide the best answers available.
Especially if they are absolutely true.
When you post something "absolutely true"
do let us know, I will be looking for it.
michellemalkingmail.com
2020-02-06 15:41:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Pelosi is a dip shit. And she really stepped into it.
I cheered for Peloso. And, I fear for my country due to a fascist like
Trump who is a dictator wannabe with a bunch of either frightened or
fascistic Republicans behind him. How much damage will he do to the US
over the next 9 months?
Post by Patrick B
And Trump should watch his mouth on Twitter.
Wonder of wonders. We agree about something!
Jack Shit
2020-02-05 19:07:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
And tearing up the speech in front of the whole world was so grown up.
Rod B.
2020-02-06 22:45:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
And tearing up the speech in front of the whole world was so grown up.
That was just horrible, wasn't it?? One would almost think that she
was trying to keep up with Trump! Just think, if she had her own charity
she could have defrauded it as Trump did, or filed for bankruptcy 4
times and cheated her vendors and employees of their earned income as
Trump did, or or or she could have lied to her husbands and cheated on
them as Trump has done to all of his wives. Or perhaps Nancy could have
been accused of the rape of a teenager as Trump was.

Republicans had to be utterly desperate for power to elect rump, the T
is invisible...
Jack Shit
2020-02-06 22:50:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
And tearing up the speech in front of the whole world was so grown up.
That was just horrible, wasn't it?? One would almost think that she
was trying to keep up with Trump! Just think, if she had her own charity
she could have defrauded it as Trump did, or filed for bankruptcy 4
times and cheated her vendors and employees of their earned income as
Trump did, or or or she could have lied to her husbands and cheated on
them as Trump has done to all of his wives. Or perhaps Nancy could have
been accused of the rape of a teenager as Trump was.
Your TDS is frightening. Have you tried rubbing some Trumpitall on it?

You lost at impeachment, you lost at Kavanaugh, you lost at Russian
collusion, so time to go back to media troll bait? You crybaby libs
are disgusting.
Rod B.
2020-02-07 19:16:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
And tearing up the speech in front of the whole world was so grown up.
That was just horrible, wasn't it?? One would almost think that she
was trying to keep up with Trump! Just think, if she had her own charity
she could have defrauded it as Trump did, or filed for bankruptcy 4
times and cheated her vendors and employees of their earned income as
Trump did, or or or she could have lied to her husbands and cheated on
them as Trump has done to all of his wives. Or perhaps Nancy could have
been accused of the rape of a teenager as Trump was.
Your TDS is frightening. Have you tried rubbing some Trumpitall on it?
You lost at impeachment, you lost at Kavanaugh, you lost at Russian
collusion, so time to go back to media troll bait? You crybaby libs
are disgusting.
I'm not a lib..I'm a registered independent, and I did not impeach
Trump. I did say that he isn't fit to be in office by Republicans own
standards. Of course now we actually have a split in the GOP with
Trump supporters on one side and the GOP of old standing with Romney.

I didn't lose anything on Kavanaugh! You are projecting again. I have
to laugh at you because you are unable to comprehend that a Republican
would not like or support Trump, but it is true. The New GOP chose him
explicitly for the job. They had to scrape the bottom of the barrel to
find the most immoral, bigoted jerk they could find to protect the Union
and it's freedoms and they found him.

I cannot fathom how they missed you, Mr.Shit....
Kevrob
2020-02-06 23:44:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
And tearing up the speech in front of the whole world was so grown up.
That was just horrible, wasn't it?? One would almost think that she
was trying to keep up with Trump!
If the copy of the speech is considered an Official Government
Record, it may have been againsty Federal Law to destroy it.

See:

[quote]



Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) announced that he is filing an ethics complaint
against Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for "destroying" a copy of
President Trump’s speech after his State of the Union address.

"BREAKING: I'm filing an ethics complaint against @SpeakerPelosi for
destroying @realDonaldTrump's State of the Union speech,” Gaetz tweeted
late Wednesday. "Her conduct was beneath the dignity of the House, and
a potential violation of law (18 USC 2071)."

"Nobody is above the law. She must be held accountable,"” he added.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/481796-gaetz-files-ethics-complaint-against-pelosi-for-destroying-trump-speech

Pure political theater, it would seem. Where's the original? On a
White House computer? Is the printed version handed to the Speaker
the version required by Article II, section 3 of the Constitution?
Post by Rod B.
Just think, if she had her own charity
She and her very wealthy husband do have one.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=943150212
Post by Rod B.
she could have defrauded it as Trump did, or filed for bankruptcy 4
times and cheated her vendors and employees of their earned income as
Trump did, or or or she could have lied to her husbands and cheated on
them as Trump has done to all of his wives. Or perhaps Nancy could have
been accused of the rape of a teenager as Trump was.
Mr Pelosi was, like Trump, a USFL owner!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Pelosi
Post by Rod B.
Republicans had to be utterly desperate for power to elect
rump, the T is invisible...
Trump's insurgency was a lot like Perot's, except DJT used
the existing party apparatus to get nominated, instead of
running as an independent/3rd party candidate. The GOP
regulars were not happy about it, but they never coalesced
behind one candidate to thwart the Orange Monster.

Many Republican stalwarts felt he "hijacked" their party
back in 2016. Example:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2017/05/23/why-i-am-no-longer-republican-pitney-column/101808152/

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Don Martin
2020-02-07 13:43:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
And tearing up the speech in front of the whole world was so grown up.
That was just horrible, wasn't it?? One would almost think that she
was trying to keep up with Trump!
If the copy of the speech is considered an Official Government
Record, it may have been againsty Federal Law to destroy it.
The original is an Official Government Record; a copy is not and may
be destroyed when no longer useful.

Representatives from Florida may have trouble understanding this.
Post by Kevrob
[quote]
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) announced that he is filing an ethics complaint
against Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for "destroying" a copy of
President Trump’s speech after his State of the Union address.
late Wednesday. "Her conduct was beneath the dignity of the House, and
a potential violation of law (18 USC 2071)."
"Nobody is above the law. She must be held accountable,"” he added.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/481796-gaetz-files-ethics-complaint-against-pelosi-for-destroying-trump-speech
Pure political theater, it would seem. Where's the original? On a
White House computer? Is the printed version handed to the Speaker
the version required by Article II, section 3 of the Constitution?
Post by Rod B.
Just think, if she had her own charity
She and her very wealthy husband do have one.
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=943150212
Post by Rod B.
she could have defrauded it as Trump did, or filed for bankruptcy 4
times and cheated her vendors and employees of their earned income as
Trump did, or or or she could have lied to her husbands and cheated on
them as Trump has done to all of his wives. Or perhaps Nancy could have
been accused of the rape of a teenager as Trump was.
Mr Pelosi was, like Trump, a USFL owner!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Pelosi
Post by Rod B.
Republicans had to be utterly desperate for power to elect
rump, the T is invisible...
Trump's insurgency was a lot like Perot's, except DJT used
the existing party apparatus to get nominated, instead of
running as an independent/3rd party candidate. The GOP
regulars were not happy about it, but they never coalesced
behind one candidate to thwart the Orange Monster.
Many Republican stalwarts felt he "hijacked" their party
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2017/05/23/why-i-am-no-longer-republican-pitney-column/101808152/
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Kevrob
2020-02-07 18:06:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Martin
Post by Kevrob
If the copy of the speech is considered an Official Government
Record, it may have been againsty Federal Law to destroy it.
The original is an Official Government Record; a copy is not and may
be destroyed when no longer useful.
Representatives from Florida may have trouble understanding this.
Post by Kevrob
[quote]
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) announced ....
[snip]
Post by Don Martin
Post by Kevrob
[/quote]
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/481796-gaetz-files-ethics-complaint-against-pelosi-for-destroying-trump-speech
Pure political theater, it would seem. Where's the original? On a
White House computer? Is the printed version handed to the Speaker
the version required by Article II, section 3 of the Constitution?
But, under law, which is the "original?" Remember, the copy that
Trump read from, the one loaded into the teleprompter and the one
on the podium might be newer than the one Pelosi tore up.

I have no idea how a court would rule, and the House Ethics committee
would probably reduce the charge to the equivalent of "disorderly
conduct," slap Mrs P on the wrist and make it all go away.

Kevin R
Don Martin
2020-02-07 18:21:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Don Martin
Post by Kevrob
If the copy of the speech is considered an Official Government
Record, it may have been againsty Federal Law to destroy it.
The original is an Official Government Record; a copy is not and may
be destroyed when no longer useful.
Representatives from Florida may have trouble understanding this.
Post by Kevrob
[quote]
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) announced ....
[snip]
Post by Don Martin
Post by Kevrob
[/quote]
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/481796-gaetz-files-ethics-complaint-against-pelosi-for-destroying-trump-speech
Pure political theater, it would seem. Where's the original? On a
White House computer? Is the printed version handed to the Speaker
the version required by Article II, section 3 of the Constitution?
But, under law, which is the "original?" Remember, the copy that
Trump read from, the one loaded into the teleprompter and the one
on the podium might be newer than the one Pelosi tore up.
I have no idea how a court would rule, and the House Ethics committee
would probably reduce the charge to the equivalent of "disorderly
conduct," slap Mrs P on the wrist and make it all go away.
You don't load paper into a teleprompter; the legal original would be
the one signed in crayon by P. Grabber, even though it is a printout
from the file loaded into the teleprompter.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Kevrob
2020-02-07 19:19:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Martin
You don't load paper into a teleprompter; the legal original would be
the one signed in crayon by P. Grabber, even though it is a printout
from the file loaded into the teleprompter.
Earlier, I asked:

[quote]

Where's the original? On a White House computer?
Is the printed version handed to the Speaker the version
required by Article II, section 3 of the Constitution?

[/quote] - Message-ID: <1674acc4-1366-4aeb-a3e8-***@googlegroups.com>

OR

http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C1674acc4-1366-4aeb-a3e8-4a321223a091%40googlegroups.com%3E

OR

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.atheism/YMTJNFi5kEk/22ELZ5nlAwAJ

I'm quite aware the original may be digital, but since Article II was
written before computer text files existed, the National Archives or
whichever relevant government office might treat the first printed,
signed copy as "the original." Now, is that what Pelosi rip up?

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Don Martin
2020-02-07 23:14:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Don Martin
You don't load paper into a teleprompter; the legal original would be
the one signed in crayon by P. Grabber, even though it is a printout
from the file loaded into the teleprompter.
[quote]
Where's the original? On a White House computer?
Is the printed version handed to the Speaker the version
required by Article II, section 3 of the Constitution?
OR
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C1674acc4-1366-4aeb-a3e8-4a321223a091%40googlegroups.com%3E
OR
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.atheism/YMTJNFi5kEk/22ELZ5nlAwAJ
I'm quite aware the original may be digital, but since Article II was
written before computer text files existed, the National Archives or
whichever relevant government office might treat the first printed,
signed copy as "the original." Now, is that what Pelosi rip up?
Probably not--P. Grabber is too fucking lazy to sign copies: she
probably had to make do with a xerox.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
LinuxGal
2020-02-07 18:23:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
I have no idea how a court would rule, and the House Ethics committee
would probably reduce the charge to the equivalent of "disorderly
conduct," slap Mrs P on the wrist and make it all go away.
Fodder for political ads this season, a Representative
voting not to impeach Trump for bribery and obstruction of
justice, but voting to impeach Pelosi for ripping a piece
of paper with Der FÃŒhrer's speech copied on it.
--
I have spoken.

https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
Michael Christ
2020-02-05 20:14:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States
of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
  No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
  that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
  passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.

This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring the
position of the president of the United States and the government of the
United States.

One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
  I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
  and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
  social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
  social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
  thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
  legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump. It is about the State of the Union.
  I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
  security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
  to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.

Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Rod B.
2020-02-05 20:34:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring the
position of the president of the United States and the government of the
United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Michael Christ
2020-02-05 21:48:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
   I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency. You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.

If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk. Guess what is going to happen from now on!

Let me tell you, it is okay to do that now.

What's next??

Stay tuned!!
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Rod B.
2020-02-05 22:53:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.


If this angers someone then so be it...
Robert
2020-02-05 23:24:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.

They should be treated as anarchists.
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
If this angers someone then so be it...
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Kevrob
2020-02-05 23:37:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
They should be treated as anarchists.
I hope you mean "left alone to live their lives, as
long as thy don't initiate force against others."

It is not illegal in the USA to _be_ an anarchist,
a communist, a socialist, a fascist, a monarchist,
a syndicalist, a theocrat, a distributist, or a
devotee of any political viewpoint. One's actions
in behalf of any idea may be subject to scrutiny by
law enforcement and the courts, but not the beliefs
themselves.

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Rod B.
2020-02-06 00:19:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
If this angers someone then so be it...
I hate to tell you this, but her rights as a citizen are not
null and void while she is in office.
Rod B.
2020-02-06 03:37:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
If this angers someone then so be it...
I hate to tell you this, but her rights as a citizen are not
null and void while she is in office.
Hate to tell you this but she was acting in elective office supposedly
representing her constituents.
As they all claim to do.
They have rights as well. As the House
leader she is acting as a major American figurehead and obviously she
has no respect for her person.
Then call her office and tell her so. Telling me won't change my
opinion...
Free speech is not showing or acting with contempt to the holder of
the Office of the President who represents the will of the people.
And yet in your hypocrisy you will not extend this honor to her
office or other officials as well, but it's okay for Trump to
belittle them and call them names and tarnish the reputation of the
office he holds because they are either the opposing party or moderate
Republicans
that see Trump as he is.

You are a hypocrite Robert....
Robert
2020-02-06 19:04:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year
to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
If this angers someone then so be it...
I hate to tell you this, but her rights as a citizen are not
null and void while she is in office.
Hate to tell you this but she was acting in elective office supposedly
representing her constituents.
As they all claim to do.
They have rights as well. As the House
leader she is acting as a major American figurehead and obviously she
has no respect for her person.
Then call her office and tell her so. Telling me won't change my
opinion...
She, like feinstein, filters out all email, letters, and phone calls
that are not pleasing to her as a matter of policy and course.

The only way to present anything to her is to trap her in a public
confrontation of some sort.
Post by Rod B.
Free speech is not showing or acting with contempt to the holder of
the Office of the President who represents the will of the people.
And yet in your hypocrisy you will not extend this honor to her
office or other officials as well, but it's okay for Trump to
belittle them and call them names and tarnish the reputation of the
office he holds because they are either the opposing party or moderate
Republicans
that see Trump as he is.
I never said I agree with all that Trump does and the manner in which
he does things. So I cannot be a hypocrite about it. He is right for
calling those people out, but from what I see he does not do it in
such a forum as he was just in. He never mentioned her or her actions.
Let them both hash it out on twitter, the new American Public Square,
which is where opinions are stated.
Post by Rod B.
You are a hypocrite Robert....
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Lucifer
2020-02-06 04:12:48 UTC
Permalink
Are you no longer talking to me?
Miloch
2020-02-06 06:47:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lucifer
Are you no longer talking to me?
lemme see...

shun

verb: shun; 3rd person present: shuns; past tense: shunned; past participle:
shunned; gerund or present participle: shunning

persistently avoid, ignore, or reject (someone or something) through antipathy
or caution.

"he shunned fashionable society"

...yup...you be shunned!

So what's the Good Book say about 'shunning'...


Psa 88:18

You caused my friend and neighbor to shun me; and my acquaintances are confused.
An instruction. By Ethan, the Ezrahite


Eccles 3:5

A time to throw stones and a time to gather stones; A time to embrace and a time
to shun embracing.


Rom 16:17

But I beseech you, brethren, to keep a watch on those who are causing the
divisions among you, and are leading others into sin, in defiance of the
instruction which you have received; and habitually to shun them.


Tim 2:16

But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more
ungodliness.


Titus 3:9

But foolish questions, and genealogies, and strifes, and contentions about the
law, shun; for they are unprofitable and vain.


...yup...you be shunned!




*
vallor
2020-02-06 10:39:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lucifer
Are you no longer talking to me?
I'll be happy to talk to you, if I ever get caught up in the group.

Right now it looks like some unamerican Ozzie snowflake is offended by
the actions of our Speaker of the House.

I am not -- you could say Madam Speaker "grabbed Trump by the pussy" --
and left Trump "bleeding from his whatever".
--
-v
"Fortunately, I hear from God about stuff." -"Michael Christ"
"The Allwise Creator hath been dishonored by being made the author of
fable, and the human mind degraded by believing it." -Thomas Paine
Robert
2020-02-06 19:06:43 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:12:48 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Are you no longer talking to me?
No, it was just that thread and the never ending recycling. Which is
what I said.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Rod B.
2020-02-06 00:36:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Robert
2020-02-06 04:20:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
For that reason there are checks and balances. And you have been
listening to the wrong news networks.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Yes, and the ultra liberals are all over that idea. If something were
to happen to those above her and she became president and maintained
her set policies there would be a revolution that would make the civil
war look like child's play, and that war was very serious with more
American men killed that in any other war.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Rod B.
2020-02-06 13:27:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
For that reason there are checks and balances. And you have been
listening to the wrong news networks.
You listen to them? I rarely do.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Yes, and the ultra liberals are all over that idea. If something were
to happen to those above her and she became president and maintained
her set policies there would be a revolution that would make the civil
war look like child's play, and that war was very serious with more
American men killed that in any other war.
Likely...some American's are just that stupid and immoral.
Robert
2020-02-06 19:13:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year
to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
For that reason there are checks and balances. And you have been
listening to the wrong news networks.
You listen to them? I rarely do.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Yes, and the ultra liberals are all over that idea. If something were
to happen to those above her and she became president and maintained
her set policies there would be a revolution that would make the civil
war look like child's play, and that war was very serious with more
American men killed that in any other war.
Likely...some American's are just that stupid and immoral.
Nope, it was fully part of the reasoning and understanding of the
founding fathers of this nation. They knew that power corrupts and
absolute power absolutely corrupts so that in the end it is the right
of the population to rise up against tyranny in any form. And if the
current Democratic party were to gain that type of a position they
have already declared what they are willing to do to the rights of the
individual. And you can see how that already plays out in places like
the left coast. If it were not for the Supreme court we would be worse
off then we already are.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Rod B.
2020-02-06 20:01:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year
to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
For that reason there are checks and balances. And you have been
listening to the wrong news networks.
You listen to them? I rarely do.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Yes, and the ultra liberals are all over that idea. If something were
to happen to those above her and she became president and maintained
her set policies there would be a revolution that would make the civil
war look like child's play, and that war was very serious with more
American men killed that in any other war.
Likely...some American's are just that stupid and immoral.
Nope, it was fully part of the reasoning and understanding of the
founding fathers of this nation. They knew that power corrupts and
absolute power absolutely corrupts
If that were true then they would be far to moral to own slaves,
and yet 8 Presidents including Washington were slave owners.
Post by Robert
so that in the end it is the right
of the population to rise up against tyranny in any form. And if the
current Democratic party were to gain that type of a position they
have already declared what they are willing to do to the rights of the
individual. And you can see how that already plays out in places like
the left coast. If it were not for the Supreme court we would be worse
off then we already are.
You have no interest in truth.
Robert
2020-02-07 00:54:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year
to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
For that reason there are checks and balances. And you have been
listening to the wrong news networks.
You listen to them? I rarely do.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Yes, and the ultra liberals are all over that idea. If something were
to happen to those above her and she became president and maintained
her set policies there would be a revolution that would make the civil
war look like child's play, and that war was very serious with more
American men killed that in any other war.
Likely...some American's are just that stupid and immoral.
Nope, it was fully part of the reasoning and understanding of the
founding fathers of this nation. They knew that power corrupts and
absolute power absolutely corrupts
If that were true then they would be far to moral to own slaves,
and yet 8 Presidents including Washington were slave owners.
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?

What about your own people who stole women and girls from other tribes
for wives? and slaves?

I don't expect you to be reasonable on this subject but there are
decent forms of slavery and indecent, like the RCC priests forcing
natives to be their slaves in America, Mexico, So America and Asia.
And worst of all they considered the native to be a sub-human species.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
so that in the end it is the right
of the population to rise up against tyranny in any form. And if the
current Democratic party were to gain that type of a position they
have already declared what they are willing to do to the rights of the
individual. And you can see how that already plays out in places like
the left coast. If it were not for the Supreme court we would be worse
off then we already are.
You have no interest in truth.
Where is yours?
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Kevrob
2020-02-07 01:00:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?

Justifying slavery is just sick.

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
LinuxGal
2020-02-07 01:31:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?
Justifying slavery is just sick.
They've got no choice, because they've doubled down on their
Bible being the source of "absolute" and "objective"
morality. If it says your female slaves never get to go
free after seven years like the male ones do, it must be
moral.
--
I have spoken.

https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
Kevrob
2020-02-07 02:19:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by LinuxGal
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?
Justifying slavery is just sick.
They've got no choice, because they've doubled down on their
Bible being the source of "absolute" and "objective"
morality. If it says your female slaves never get to go
free after seven years like the male ones do, it must be
moral.
It shouldn't matter to a Christian what the OT rules for the
Hebrews were. They are supposed to be under the "New Dispensation,"
and imitating their "Redeemer." And Josh owned _how_ many slaves?

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Christopher A. Lee
2020-02-07 07:47:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by LinuxGal
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?
Justifying slavery is just sick.
They've got no choice, because they've doubled down on their
Bible being the source of "absolute" and "objective"
morality. If it says your female slaves never get to go
free after seven years like the male ones do, it must be
moral.
It shouldn't matter to a Christian what the OT rules for the
Hebrews were. They are supposed to be under the "New Dispensation,"
and imitating their "Redeemer." And Josh owned _how_ many slaves?
They made up the "grace" bullshit that to get around the OT laws -
their pretend friend was supposed to have said something about "not a
jot or tittle" of the OT law being changed.

Does it even fool themselves?
Don Martin
2020-02-07 13:43:43 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 01:47:15 -0600, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Kevrob
Post by LinuxGal
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?
Justifying slavery is just sick.
They've got no choice, because they've doubled down on their
Bible being the source of "absolute" and "objective"
morality. If it says your female slaves never get to go
free after seven years like the male ones do, it must be
moral.
It shouldn't matter to a Christian what the OT rules for the
Hebrews were. They are supposed to be under the "New Dispensation,"
and imitating their "Redeemer." And Josh owned _how_ many slaves?
They made up the "grace" bullshit that to get around the OT laws -
their pretend friend was supposed to have said something about "not a
jot or tittle" of the OT law being changed.
Does it even fool themselves?
Not so fast--their capacity for being fooled appears to be infinite.
In today's batch of posts we have some guy berating atheists for not
knowing history while citing the sale of the Apostle Paul's copy of
the KJV as "evidence." And he brags about being in contact with its
current owner.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
LinuxGal
2020-02-07 14:19:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Martin
In today's batch of posts we have some guy berating atheists for not
knowing history while citing the sale of the Apostle Paul's copy of
the KJV as "evidence." And he brags about being in contact with its
current owner.
Latter-day alt.atheism: enough like The Onion to make you
cry.
--
I have spoken.

https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
Christopher A. Lee
2020-02-07 15:49:25 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 08:43:43 -0500, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 01:47:15 -0600, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Kevrob
Post by LinuxGal
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?
Justifying slavery is just sick.
They've got no choice, because they've doubled down on their
Bible being the source of "absolute" and "objective"
morality. If it says your female slaves never get to go
free after seven years like the male ones do, it must be
moral.
It shouldn't matter to a Christian what the OT rules for the
Hebrews were. They are supposed to be under the "New Dispensation,"
and imitating their "Redeemer." And Josh owned _how_ many slaves?
They made up the "grace" bullshit that to get around the OT laws -
their pretend friend was supposed to have said something about "not a
jot or tittle" of the OT law being changed.
Does it even fool themselves?
Not so fast--their capacity for being fooled appears to be infinite.
In today's batch of posts we have some guy berating atheists for not
knowing history while citing the sale of the Apostle Paul's copy of
the KJV as "evidence." And he brags about being in contact with its
current owner.
I didn't see that one - but then I have a very powerful killfile,
including anything cross-posted from many groups as well as
domain-level filtering on Google and several anonymisers with
individual higher priority overrides for specific users.

But nobody could be that stupid, unless he's trolling for flames.
Don Martin
2020-02-07 16:36:46 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:49:25 -0600, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 08:43:43 -0500, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 01:47:15 -0600, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Kevrob
Post by LinuxGal
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?
Justifying slavery is just sick.
They've got no choice, because they've doubled down on their
Bible being the source of "absolute" and "objective"
morality. If it says your female slaves never get to go
free after seven years like the male ones do, it must be
moral.
It shouldn't matter to a Christian what the OT rules for the
Hebrews were. They are supposed to be under the "New Dispensation,"
and imitating their "Redeemer." And Josh owned _how_ many slaves?
They made up the "grace" bullshit that to get around the OT laws -
their pretend friend was supposed to have said something about "not a
jot or tittle" of the OT law being changed.
Does it even fool themselves?
Not so fast--their capacity for being fooled appears to be infinite.
In today's batch of posts we have some guy berating atheists for not
knowing history while citing the sale of the Apostle Paul's copy of
the KJV as "evidence." And he brags about being in contact with its
current owner.
I didn't see that one - but then I have a very powerful killfile,
including anything cross-posted from many groups as well as
domain-level filtering on Google and several anonymisers with
individual higher priority overrides for specific users.
But nobody could be that stupid, unless he's trolling for flames.
I dunno. I take the displayed stupidity and ignorance here at face
value, since we cannot know the real motives of others anyway. They
remind me of a radio program we had when I was a kid, "It Pays To Be
Ignorant," a mock quiz show in which a panel of contestants (always
the same ones) competed at providing the stupidest answers to simple
questions. It flattered its audience by confining itself to questions
that they could answer, becoming "superior" to the more important
folks who were "on the radio."

Ah, the simple humor of a simpler time, preserved in aspic here by our
resident theists.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Michael Christ
2020-02-07 22:43:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher A. Lee
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 08:43:43 -0500, Don Martin
Post by Don Martin
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 01:47:15 -0600, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Kevrob
Post by LinuxGal
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?
Justifying slavery is just sick.
They've got no choice, because they've doubled down on their
Bible being the source of "absolute" and "objective"
morality. If it says your female slaves never get to go
free after seven years like the male ones do, it must be
moral.
It shouldn't matter to a Christian what the OT rules for the
Hebrews were. They are supposed to be under the "New Dispensation,"
and imitating their "Redeemer." And Josh owned _how_ many slaves?
They made up the "grace" bullshit that to get around the OT laws -
their pretend friend was supposed to have said something about "not a
jot or tittle" of the OT law being changed.
Does it even fool themselves?
Not so fast--their capacity for being fooled appears to be infinite.
In today's batch of posts we have some guy berating atheists for not
knowing history while citing the sale of the Apostle Paul's copy of
the KJV as "evidence." And he brags about being in contact with its
current owner.
I didn't see that one - but then I have a very powerful killfile,
including anything cross-posted from many groups as well as
domain-level filtering on Google and several anonymisers with
individual higher priority overrides for specific users.
But nobody could be that stupid, unless he's trolling for flames.
:-). Says the hypocrite flame thrower! :-).

You are a funny fellow to see!




Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Michael Christ
2020-02-07 22:31:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Don Martin
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 01:47:15 -0600, Christopher A. Lee
Post by Christopher A. Lee
Post by Kevrob
Post by LinuxGal
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?
Justifying slavery is just sick.
They've got no choice, because they've doubled down on their
Bible being the source of "absolute" and "objective"
morality. If it says your female slaves never get to go
free after seven years like the male ones do, it must be
moral.
It shouldn't matter to a Christian what the OT rules for the
Hebrews were. They are supposed to be under the "New Dispensation,"
and imitating their "Redeemer." And Josh owned _how_ many slaves?
They made up the "grace" bullshit that to get around the OT laws -
their pretend friend was supposed to have said something about "not a
jot or tittle" of the OT law being changed.
Does it even fool themselves?
Not so fast--their capacity for being fooled appears to be infinite.
In today's batch of posts we have some guy berating atheists for not
knowing history while citing the sale of the Apostle Paul's copy of
the KJV as "evidence." And he brags about being in contact with its
current owner.
You two teenagers should go into writing children's stories, your story
telling is great!




Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Don Martin
2020-02-07 13:43:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you. How do you know whether of
not he followed the principles of God in regards to slavery or not?
How many slaves did your Nazarene own, again?
Justifying slavery is just sick.
But generally profitable.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
Rod B.
2020-02-07 17:58:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year
to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
For that reason there are checks and balances. And you have been
listening to the wrong news networks.
You listen to them? I rarely do.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Yes, and the ultra liberals are all over that idea. If something were
to happen to those above her and she became president and maintained
her set policies there would be a revolution that would make the civil
war look like child's play, and that war was very serious with more
American men killed that in any other war.
Likely...some American's are just that stupid and immoral.
Nope, it was fully part of the reasoning and understanding of the
founding fathers of this nation. They knew that power corrupts and
absolute power absolutely corrupts
If that were true then they would be far to moral to own slaves,
and yet 8 Presidents including Washington were slave owners.
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you.
Their actions should be condemned, just as you are condemning my opinion.
Robert
2020-02-07 21:36:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year
to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
For that reason there are checks and balances. And you have been
listening to the wrong news networks.
You listen to them? I rarely do.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Yes, and the ultra liberals are all over that idea. If something were
to happen to those above her and she became president and maintained
her set policies there would be a revolution that would make the civil
war look like child's play, and that war was very serious with more
American men killed that in any other war.
Likely...some American's are just that stupid and immoral.
Nope, it was fully part of the reasoning and understanding of the
founding fathers of this nation. They knew that power corrupts and
absolute power absolutely corrupts
If that were true then they would be far to moral to own slaves,
and yet 8 Presidents including Washington were slave owners.
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you.
Their actions should be condemned, just as you are condemning my opinion.
From what I have seen you have not been reasonable in your actions
about slavery over all. I am saying that your opinion is without
reasonable merit. I have also seen you rant against slavery in the
bible, in the OT days, even against God in that area.

But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species. Which also appears to be the
attitude of Earl and Pat.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Patrick B
2020-02-07 22:36:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species. Which also appears to be the
attitude of Earl and Pat.
Stop stalking me.
Rod B.
2020-02-07 23:47:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year
to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
For that reason there are checks and balances. And you have been
listening to the wrong news networks.
You listen to them? I rarely do.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Yes, and the ultra liberals are all over that idea. If something were
to happen to those above her and she became president and maintained
her set policies there would be a revolution that would make the civil
war look like child's play, and that war was very serious with more
American men killed that in any other war.
Likely...some American's are just that stupid and immoral.
Nope, it was fully part of the reasoning and understanding of the
founding fathers of this nation. They knew that power corrupts and
absolute power absolutely corrupts
If that were true then they would be far to moral to own slaves,
and yet 8 Presidents including Washington were slave owners.
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you.
Their actions should be condemned, just as you are condemning my opinion.
From what I have seen you have not been reasonable in your actions
about slavery over all. I am saying that your opinion is without
reasonable merit. I have also seen you rant against slavery in the
bible, in the OT days, even against God in that area.
Indeed I have because I don't believe that God would do such a thing
but men would. Simple as that.
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species.
All of mankind falls short of humane standards in one way or another
to the point that I don't know where to begin ranting and raving.




Which also appears to be the
Post by Robert
attitude of Earl and Pat.
Robert
2020-02-08 03:04:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the government
of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping their
filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump
can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about
medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year
to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you. What
she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
but you must understand that her actions are covered under
the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
Not as one that is sworn to uphold the office of the presidency as
well as to extend full legal rights to the republicans so they could
call witnesses, PLUS, she tried to place the House as ruler over the
will of the American people and over the Office of the Presidency thus
going fully against the constitution of the USA.
They should be treated as anarchists.
She is next in line of succession after the vice president,
Robert.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and take
a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
that the office has honor to begin with.
For that reason there are checks and balances. And you have been
listening to the wrong news networks.
You listen to them? I rarely do.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
If this angers someone then so be it...
Yes, and the ultra liberals are all over that idea. If something were
to happen to those above her and she became president and maintained
her set policies there would be a revolution that would make the civil
war look like child's play, and that war was very serious with more
American men killed that in any other war.
Likely...some American's are just that stupid and immoral.
Nope, it was fully part of the reasoning and understanding of the
founding fathers of this nation. They knew that power corrupts and
absolute power absolutely corrupts
If that were true then they would be far to moral to own slaves,
and yet 8 Presidents including Washington were slave owners.
So judging someone today and condemning their actions for what was
moral in that day is justifiable to you.
Their actions should be condemned, just as you are condemning my opinion.
From what I have seen you have not been reasonable in your actions
about slavery over all. I am saying that your opinion is without
reasonable merit. I have also seen you rant against slavery in the
bible, in the OT days, even against God in that area.
Indeed I have because I don't believe that God would do such a thing
but men would. Simple as that.
I know you read what I wrote about how God dealt with it in the case
of the Israelites. So you do know the conditions in which is was
allowed, and why there was good reason for it to exist in that day.
Did ungodly people abuse it? Certainly. Did some sign up for it but
then rebelled with a poor ungrateful attitude, yes.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species.
All of mankind falls short of humane standards in one way or another
to the point that I don't know where to begin ranting and raving.
Yes, but that does not give you the right to excuse their actions away
when you feel so strongly about it, for it is every bit as bad as what
child molesters do today. That is hypocritical.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Lucifer
2020-02-08 00:12:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species. Which also appears to be the
attitude of Earl and Pat.
Christianity is incredibly stupid. You each think you are the only one
with proper understanding but you are all wrong. You are all sick.
Rod B.
2020-02-08 00:31:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species. Which also appears to be the
attitude of Earl and Pat.
Christianity is incredibly stupid. You each think you are the only one
with proper understanding but you are all wrong. You are all sick.
Isn't that interesting! Multiple peoples and multiple languages
on earth and yet at one time there were a very few people to start
humanity with one language among them to communicate with one another,

and Barry is unable to see this....
Robert
2020-02-08 03:05:51 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 11:12:21 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species. Which also appears to be the
attitude of Earl and Pat.
Christianity is incredibly stupid. You each think you are the only one
with proper understanding but you are all wrong. You are all sick.
You don't even know what we are speaking about.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Lucifer
2020-02-08 03:46:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 11:12:21 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species. Which also appears to be the
attitude of Earl and Pat.
Christianity is incredibly stupid. You each think you are the only one
with proper understanding but you are all wrong. You are all sick.
You don't even know what we are speaking about.
Christianity is an utter disgrace. You are one of the worst. You think
slavery is OK and it's OK to kill a slave. You only care about
yourself.
Robert
2020-02-08 06:38:41 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:46:15 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 11:12:21 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species. Which also appears to be the
attitude of Earl and Pat.
Christianity is incredibly stupid. You each think you are the only one
with proper understanding but you are all wrong. You are all sick.
You don't even know what we are speaking about.
Christianity is an utter disgrace. You are one of the worst. You think
slavery is OK and it's OK to kill a slave. You only care about
yourself.
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave. Many people have put
themselves into bondage in order to eat, have clothes and a place to
sleep. It is the shame of the one who holds them back in bondage so
that they cannot get out. If you are working for the man, then what is
the real difference? Many people live hand to mouth, one setback and
they are sunk. Debtors prison is a form of slavery, but at least they
could pay their debts off.

If I cared only about myself why would I spend any time here with you,
an accuser.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Lucifer
2020-02-08 07:26:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:46:15 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 11:12:21 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species. Which also appears to be the
attitude of Earl and Pat.
Christianity is incredibly stupid. You each think you are the only one
with proper understanding but you are all wrong. You are all sick.
You don't even know what we are speaking about.
Christianity is an utter disgrace. You are one of the worst. You think
slavery is OK and it's OK to kill a slave. You only care about
yourself.
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave.
You did when you said your morality agrees with that of God.
In his bible God says it's OK to keep slaves and for the master
to kill a slave as long as he does it properly.
Post by Robert
Many people have put
themselves into bondage in order to eat, have clothes and a place to
sleep. It is the shame of the one who holds them back in bondage so
that they cannot get out. If you are working for the man, then what is
the real difference? Many people live hand to mouth, one setback and
they are sunk. Debtors prison is a form of slavery, but at least they
could pay their debts off.
Is that all good?
Post by Robert
If I cared only about myself why would I spend any time here with you,
an accuser.
As a Christian you have to continuously lie to yourself and others.
Have I lost you, again?
Robert
2020-02-08 08:13:52 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 18:26:30 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave.
You did when you said your morality agrees with that of God.
In his bible God says it's OK to keep slaves and for the master
to kill a slave as long as he does it properly.
Prove it.
I'm sorry but this ends any reason to communicate with you. Unless you
can prove your point.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Lucifer
2020-02-08 09:52:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 18:26:30 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave.
You did when you said your morality agrees with that of God.
In his bible God says it's OK to keep slaves and for the master
to kill a slave as long as he does it properly.
Prove it.
I'm sorry but this ends any reason to communicate with you. Unless you
can prove your point.
Exodus 21
20 And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and
he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished.
21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not
be punished: for he is his money.
Robert
2020-02-08 15:10:10 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 20:52:00 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 18:26:30 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave.
You did when you said your morality agrees with that of God.
In his bible God says it's OK to keep slaves and for the master
to kill a slave as long as he does it properly.
Prove it.
I'm sorry but this ends any reason to communicate with you. Unless you
can prove your point.
Exodus 21
20 And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and
he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished.
21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not
be punished: for he is his money.
You didn't prove a thing. V 20 says it is the death penalty for him,
that is what it means by "He shall surely be punished". In Hebrew the
word means "be avenged".

21:20, 21 A master could punish a slave, but he did not have the right
to kill him. If a servant died immediately after a beating, the master
was guilty; but if the slave lived a day or two, the master was not
punishable because he obviously did not intend to kill a slave who was
worth money to him.

And to answer what you did not say, but inferred. A Christian is NOT
under the Mosaic Law. They were made free of that by the one who
completely fulfilled the law and was sacrificed for it.

Otherwise there would be a whole lot of dead "Christians". Stoned to
death for committing adultery.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Lucifer
2020-02-08 21:28:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 20:52:00 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 18:26:30 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave.
You did when you said your morality agrees with that of God.
In his bible God says it's OK to keep slaves and for the master
to kill a slave as long as he does it properly.
Prove it.
I'm sorry but this ends any reason to communicate with you. Unless you
can prove your point.
Exodus 21
20 And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and
he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished.
21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not
be punished: for he is his money.
You didn't prove a thing. V 20 says it is the death penalty for him,
that is what it means by "He shall surely be punished". In Hebrew the
word means "be avenged".
21:20, 21 A master could punish a slave, but he did not have the right
to kill him. If a servant died immediately after a beating, the master
was guilty; but if the slave lived a day or two, the master was not
punishable because he obviously did not intend to kill a slave who was
worth money to him.
You are putting your own morality on the bible because you don't
agree with God's morality. I consider my point proven.
Post by Robert
And to answer what you did not say, but inferred. A Christian is NOT
under the Mosaic Law. They were made free of that by the one who
completely fulfilled the law and was sacrificed for it.
Otherwise there would be a whole lot of dead "Christians". Stoned to
death for committing adultery.
The point is your morality is superior to that of God but you feel
compelled to praise God.
You have to lie to yourself and others to remain a Christian.
Robert
2020-02-09 03:39:15 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 09 Feb 2020 08:28:59 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 20:52:00 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 18:26:30 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave.
You did when you said your morality agrees with that of God.
In his bible God says it's OK to keep slaves and for the master
to kill a slave as long as he does it properly.
Prove it.
I'm sorry but this ends any reason to communicate with you. Unless you
can prove your point.
Exodus 21
20 And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and
he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished.
21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not
be punished: for he is his money.
You didn't prove a thing. V 20 says it is the death penalty for him,
that is what it means by "He shall surely be punished". In Hebrew the
word means "be avenged".
21:20, 21 A master could punish a slave, but he did not have the right
to kill him. If a servant died immediately after a beating, the master
was guilty; but if the slave lived a day or two, the master was not
punishable because he obviously did not intend to kill a slave who was
worth money to him.
You are putting your own morality on the bible because you don't
agree with God's morality. I consider my point proven.
It was proven to be in error. Per the very scripture you yourself
quoted. There was no reason for me to open it up for you to see, yet I
did because of your apparent lack of reading comprehension.
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
And to answer what you did not say, but inferred. A Christian is NOT
under the Mosaic Law. They were made free of that by the one who
completely fulfilled the law and was sacrificed for it.
Otherwise there would be a whole lot of dead "Christians". Stoned to
death for committing adultery.
The point is your morality is superior to that of God but you feel
compelled to praise God.
You have to lie to yourself and others to remain a Christian.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Robert
2020-02-09 03:55:49 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 12:54:10 -0600, Mitchell Holman
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 08:23:23 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 18:26:30 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave.
You did when you said your morality agrees with that of God.
In his bible God says it's OK to keep slaves and for the master
to kill a slave as long as he does it properly.
Prove it.
Beating a slave to death is just fine as
long as she lingers for a day or two before
expiring.
See my reply to Lucifer. There is no proper way to kill a slave.
The passage speaks for itself. Slaves are
property, the owner can treat them as harshly
as he wants.
Even Roman slaves could make money on the
side and eventually buy their freedom, I see
nothing in the Bible permitting even that.
There is a lot more said about this in other passages of scripture.
There were distinctions made like you said, and freedom could be
purchased and granted. In regards to this one passage it is obvious
about the class of slave it is and was. Yes, they were property, and
had you read a bit more you would have seen there was limitations to
their actions, and certain actions required that they be set free
without payment for their lives.

Now, let me ask you, if you had a slave who was beholden to you and it
started acting belligerent and unresponsive what would you have done,
told them to sit awhile and think about it? Look at the obstinate
people here and what it would take to make them behave responsibly and
with respect. Some people just take it upon themselves to be as
irritable as possible and like a child deserve more than simple
admonishment.

I'll check your reply later. For now I have to focus on a piece of
music I am writing and gitter done. I have been putting it off for
three days and I see a lot of posts yet to be read. Hope you
understand, late.
When a man strikes his male or female slave with
a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he
shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives
for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since
the slave is his own property.
(Exodus 21:20-21)
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Kevrob
2020-02-09 04:44:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Now, let me ask you, if you had a slave who was
beholden to you and it......
IT!!!!!!!???????????????????

You call another person, one you are to treat as a
brother or sister "IT?????!!!!!"

Treating a person like a thing is at the heart of
what is wrong with human slavery.

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Michael Christ
2020-02-09 04:54:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Robert
Now, let me ask you, if you had a slave who was
beholden to you and it......
IT!!!!!!!???????????????????
You call another person, one you are to treat as a
brother or sister "IT?????!!!!!"
Treating a person like a thing is at the heart of
what is wrong with human slavery.
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Ha! You're on a roll. Well, there is a first for everything it seems.
Though you could be being a little harsh, a little legalistically
frigit, my holy atheist friend.





Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Siri Cruise
2020-02-09 05:37:40 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by Kevrob
Treating a person like a thing is at the heart of
what is wrong with human slavery.
At the time of Jesus divorce had become a controversy: Could a
man simply discard a wife without explanation, or was the husband
still responsible to the woman?

Some Pharisees came to him to
test him. They asked, 'Is it
lawful for a man to divorce
his wife for any and every
reason?'

'Haven't you read,' he replied,
'that at the beginning the Creator
"made them male and female,"
and said, "For this reason a man
will leave his father and mother
and be united to his wife, and
the two will become one flesh"
So they are no longer two, but
one flesh. Therefore what God
has joined together, let no one
separate.'

The quote usually stops there with a triumphant 'WOMAN! WOMAN!
See Jesus said a marriage is one man and one woman!' while
ignoring what question Jesus was answerring. And snipping the
follow up question.

'Why then,' they asked, 'did
Moses command that a man give
his wife a certificate of divorce
and send her away?'

Jesus replied, 'Moses permitted
you to divorce your wives because
your hearts were hard. But it was
not this way from the beginning.
I tell you that anyone who
divorces his wife, except for
sexual immorality, and marries
another woman commits adultery.'

So how does this apply to the question of slavery? The usual
answer to slavery is that it wasn't like american slavery; that
the slave was not stripped of all humanity. Also according to
Leviticus slaves are supposed to be released after seven years.

Another possibility is that unlike divorce slavery hadn't yet
become controversy it is today. So perhaps Jesus and his god were
as anti-slavery as they were anti-divorce, but humanity wasn't
grown up enough to hear that. So we had to wait another 1700
years until slowly dawned on humans that if they want to be
treated as humans, they should treat everyone else humans and
stopping keeping them in slavery.

See also how Martin Luther King Jr was LBJ's nigger until King
started to about war or economic equality.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-09 14:21:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
In article
Post by Kevrob
Treating a person like a thing is at the heart of
what is wrong with human slavery.
At the time of Jesus divorce had become a controversy: Could a
man simply discard a wife without explanation, or was the husband
still responsible to the woman?
Some Pharisees came to him to
test him. They asked, 'Is it
lawful for a man to divorce
his wife for any and every
reason?'
'Haven't you read,' he replied,
'that at the beginning the Creator
"made them male and female,"
and said, "For this reason a man
will leave his father and mother
and be united to his wife, and
the two will become one flesh"
So they are no longer two, but
one flesh. Therefore what God
has joined together, let no one
separate.'
The quote usually stops there with a triumphant 'WOMAN! WOMAN!
See Jesus said a marriage is one man and one woman!' while
ignoring what question Jesus was answerring. And snipping the
follow up question.
'Why then,' they asked, 'did
Moses command that a man give
his wife a certificate of divorce
and send her away?'
Jesus replied, 'Moses permitted
you to divorce your wives because
your hearts were hard. But it was
not this way from the beginning.
I tell you that anyone who
divorces his wife, except for
sexual immorality, and marries
another woman commits adultery.'
So how does this apply to the question of slavery? The usual
answer to slavery is that it wasn't like american slavery; that
the slave was not stripped of all humanity. Also according to
Leviticus slaves are supposed to be released after seven years.
Unless the slave was a female, of course..........



When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she
will not be freed at the end of six years as the
men are.
(Exodus 21:7-11)
LinuxGal
2020-02-09 14:29:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Siri Cruise
So how does this apply to the question of slavery? The usual
answer to slavery is that it wasn't like american slavery; that
the slave was not stripped of all humanity. Also according to
Leviticus slaves are supposed to be released after seven years.
Unless the slave was a female, of course..........
When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she
will not be freed at the end of six years as the
men are.
(Exodus 21:7-11)
In the Bible, women get the shit end of the stick any way
you look at it.
--
I have spoken.

https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-09 14:40:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by LinuxGal
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Siri Cruise
So how does this apply to the question of slavery? The usual
answer to slavery is that it wasn't like american slavery; that
the slave was not stripped of all humanity. Also according to
Leviticus slaves are supposed to be released after seven years.
Unless the slave was a female, of course..........
When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she
will not be freed at the end of six years as the
men are.
(Exodus 21:7-11)
In the Bible, women get the shit end of the stick any way
you look at it.
Pretty much true for all religions.

Why women put up with it is beyond me...
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-09 14:28:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 12:54:10 -0600, Mitchell Holman
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 08:23:23 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 18:26:30 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave.
You did when you said your morality agrees with that of God.
In his bible God says it's OK to keep slaves and for the master
to kill a slave as long as he does it properly.
Prove it.
Beating a slave to death is just fine as
long as she lingers for a day or two before
expiring.
See my reply to Lucifer. There is no proper way to kill a slave.
The passage speaks for itself. Slaves are
property, the owner can treat them as harshly
as he wants.
Even Roman slaves could make money on the
side and eventually buy their freedom, I see
nothing in the Bible permitting even that.
There is a lot more said about this in other passages of scripture.
There were distinctions made like you said, and freedom could be
purchased and granted.
I know of no passage that describes a
Hebrew slave buying their freedom.


In regards to this one passage it is obvious
Post by Robert
about the class of slave it is and was. Yes, they were property, and
had you read a bit more you would have seen there was limitations to
their actions, and certain actions required that they be set free
without payment for their lives.
Now, let me ask you, if you had a slave who was beholden to you and it
started acting belligerent and unresponsive what would you have done,
told them to sit awhile and think about it? Look at the obstinate
people here and what it would take to make them behave responsibly and
with respect. Some people just take it upon themselves to be as
irritable as possible and like a child deserve more than simple
admonishment.
If beating slaves to death were not a
common occurance they would not have made
laws requlating the practice.

PS: The whole idea that leering at your
neighbors wife is sin but buying her daughter
and beating her to death is not is repugnant.
Don't you agree?
Kevrob
2020-02-08 16:00:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:46:15 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 11:12:21 +1100, Lucifer
Post by Lucifer
Post by Robert
But I have not seen you rant against the doctrines of the RCC that
calls native people a sub-human species. Which also appears to be the
attitude of Earl and Pat.
Christianity is incredibly stupid. You each think you are the only one
with proper understanding but you are all wrong. You are all sick.
You don't even know what we are speaking about.
Christianity is an utter disgrace. You are one of the worst. You think
slavery is OK and it's OK to kill a slave. You only care about
yourself.
I said nothing about its ok to kill a slave. Many people have put
themselves into bondage in order to eat, have clothes and a place to
sleep.
Indentured servitude is not chattel slavery. Making slaves of conquered
people was something the OT Yahooey was supposed to have ordered the
Hebrews to do. Of course, writing that story that was just a way
to provide political legitimacy to the social system headed by the
local chieftans and priests.
Post by Robert
It is the shame of the one who holds them back in bondage so
that they cannot get out. If you are working for the man, then what is
the real difference? Many people live hand to mouth, one setback and
they are sunk. Debtors prison is a form of slavery, but at least they
could pay their debts off.
If I cared only about myself why would I spend any time here with you,
an accuser.
Because you think you are under a geas where you must spread your
superstition to those who don't believe in it? Because you think
it will earn you brownie points with your beloved Thing With
Three Souls? Because you are a trolling asshole? Because you are
a Poe?

Pick one or more.

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Michael Christ
2020-02-06 01:57:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the
government of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping
their filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you.
What she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being
as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
  I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
  but you must understand that her actions are covered under
  the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
  a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and
take a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
  So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
  into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
  into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
  brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
  that the office has honor to begin with.
If the office is not honoured, no leader will be honoured.

That is what Pelosi is not seeing. She is not seeing the forest for the
trees.
  If this angers someone then so be it...
Have it your way then.

But remember, the 'I'll do what I fuckin' want' generation is going to
end in tears for all. You were told.
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Rod B.
2020-02-06 13:29:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring
the position of the president of the United States and the
government of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping
their filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further, the
degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you.
What she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and being
as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
   I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
   but you must understand that her actions are covered under
   the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
   a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and
take a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
   So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
   into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
   into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
   brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
   that the office has honor to begin with.
If the office is not honoured, no leader will be honoured.
That is what Pelosi is not seeing.  She is not seeing the forest for the
trees.
   If this angers someone then so be it...
Have it your way then.
But remember, the 'I'll do what I fuckin' want' generation is going to
end in tears for all.  You were told.
I don't agree, but it is not the first time..
Michael Christ
2020-02-07 05:04:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the
United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United
States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about
dishonouring the position of the president of the United States
and the government of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping
their filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further,
the degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you.
What she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and
being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still not
getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
   I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
   but you must understand that her actions are covered under
   the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
   a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and
take a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
   So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
   into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
   into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
   brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
   that the office has honor to begin with.
If the office is not honoured, no leader will be honoured.
That is what Pelosi is not seeing.  She is not seeing the forest for
the trees.
   If this angers someone then so be it...
Have it your way then.
But remember, the 'I'll do what I fuckin' want' generation is going to
end in tears for all.  You were told.
   I don't agree, but it is not the first time..
It doesn't bother me that you don't agree like it moves me to act as
with all the others.

The Lord told me a long time ago to extend a greater grace to you.
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Rod B.
2020-02-07 17:53:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of
the United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the
United States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
   No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
   that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
   passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
Sorry, have to strongly disagree with you on this.
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about
dishonouring the position of the president of the United States
and the government of the United States.
One can do all the checks and balances one likes without wiping
their filthy ass on the highest authority in the land.
   I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
   and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
   social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
   social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
   thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
   legislation from passing the house.
It is not about Trump.  It is about the State of the Union.
   I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
   security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
   to be active engaged to protect those programs.
Good for you, but you need to see what I am saying and further,
the degradation of the USA political system and society.
Everyone on this thread needs to note that.
    I understand what you are saying nut I do not agree with you.
What she did was a demonstration of her disgust for Trump, and
being as she
is always directly involved with him, she is in a very good position to
know from direct experience whether he is lying again or not.
Pelosi is not above the office of the Presidency.  You are still
not getting the ramifications what I am saying Rod.
   I have no problem with understanding what you are saying
   but you must understand that her actions are covered under
   the right of free expression and free speech, more so than
   a death threat or an invitation that someone should be killed.
If I don't like the president I don't walk into the oval office and
take a dump on his desk.  Guess what is going to happen from now on!
   So be it. If he be a true Leader then he brings his honor
   into the office. If he be a liar he brings his dishonor
   into the office. The deeds of the doer determine the honor
   brought into the office of President, and are the very reason
   that the office has honor to begin with.
If the office is not honoured, no leader will be honoured.
That is what Pelosi is not seeing.  She is not seeing the forest for
the trees.
   If this angers someone then so be it...
Have it your way then.
But remember, the 'I'll do what I fuckin' want' generation is going
to end in tears for all.  You were told.
    I don't agree, but it is not the first time..
It doesn't bother me that you don't agree like it moves me to act as
with all the others.
The Lord told me a long time ago to extend a greater grace to you.
Well..I do understand what you were saying. I'll leave it at that
Michael.
Davej
2020-02-05 21:09:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring the
position of the president of the United States and the government of the
United States.
Yes, and that is what Trump DOES. We have a proven ally such as the
Kurds and then Trump suddenly says "Oh well, let's pull back and
allow the Turks and the Russians to exterminate the Kurds."
Mattb
2020-02-06 02:08:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Davej
Post by Michael Christ
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring the
position of the president of the United States and the government of the
United States.
Yes, and that is what Trump DOES. We have a proven ally such as the
Kurds and then Trump suddenly says "Oh well, let's pull back and
allow the Turks and the Russians to exterminate the Kurds."
On that Trump was a total idiot.
ravn
2020-02-06 21:55:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
This is not about 'checks and balances', this is about dishonouring the
position of the president of the United States and the government of the
United States.
You mean POTUS, Donald Jack-ASS Trump, dishonoring the US government, the American people, & the rest of the world. As usual, your head is in the clouds, or up your own ass. Either way, you can't see the world for what it really is.
Michael Christ
2020-02-06 22:01:36 UTC
Permalink
The jackass snipper, the penis pulling self-puppet of vacuous pomp has
been snipped.



Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Mattb
2020-02-06 02:06:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
Rod B.
2020-02-07 17:59:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
I am glad that you agree.
Mattb
2020-02-07 20:11:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
I am glad that you agree.
We may disagree on the special status of Catholics Church but on
this we do.
Rod B.
2020-02-07 20:50:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
I am glad that you agree.
We may disagree on the special status of Catholics Church but on
this we do.
Special status of Catholics? You lost me there Matt, I'm not sure
of what you are referring too..?
Mattb
2020-02-07 22:32:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
I am glad that you agree.
We may disagree on the special status of Catholics Church but on
this we do.
Special status of Catholics?
Well if a Catholic and a non-Catholic do the exact same thing (wrong)
you have shown only the non-Catholic is worthy of correction.
Post by Rod B.
You lost me there Matt, I'm not sure
of what you are referring too..?
Rod B.
2020-02-07 23:59:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
I am glad that you agree.
We may disagree on the special status of Catholics Church but on
this we do.
Special status of Catholics?
Well if a Catholic and a non-Catholic do the exact same thing (wrong)
you have shown only the non-Catholic is worthy of correction.
Okay. I naturally assume that a Catholic will know better than to
do something like that because if he did it deliberately then it's
a sin to death, and what can I say to some that doesn't care about
themselves enough to avoid doing that? They won't care for others.
Read the verses below to understand what I'm saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Heb 10:26  For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the
knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,

Heb 10:27  But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery
indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

Heb 10:28  He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or
three witnesses:

Heb 10:29  Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought
worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the
blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and
hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?


But some one who is not a Catholic and outside of Grace I would not
expect that they know or understand this, so it's right to warn them
against doing it again as their act may not have been deliberate.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
You lost me there Matt, I'm not sure
of what you are referring too..?
Robert
2020-02-08 03:11:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
I am glad that you agree.
We may disagree on the special status of Catholics Church but on
this we do.
Special status of Catholics?
Well if a Catholic and a non-Catholic do the exact same thing (wrong)
you have shown only the non-Catholic is worthy of correction.
Okay. I naturally assume that a Catholic will know better than to
do something like that because if he did it deliberately then it's
a sin to death, and what can I say to some that doesn't care about
themselves enough to avoid doing that? They won't care for others.
Read the verses below to understand what I'm saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Heb 10:26  For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the
knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
Heb 10:27  But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery
indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
Heb 10:28  He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or
Heb 10:29  Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought
worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the
blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and
hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
But some one who is not a Catholic and outside of Grace I would not
expect that they know or understand this, so it's right to warn them
against doing it again as their act may not have been deliberate.
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.

Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
You lost me there Matt, I'm not sure
of what you are referring too..?
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Patrick B
2020-02-08 15:25:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
Ted
2020-02-08 16:07:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
Yep.
Mattb
2020-02-08 20:45:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
No they sent them out to steal and kill.
tesla sTinker
2020-02-08 21:41:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
No they sent them out to steal and kill.
God does not grant grace to sinners; until they repent. Doing Penance.
And that alone is not enough, yee must have sanctifying grace, not just
grace. And the sinner, cannot go and sin again. Just look at Rome,
Jesus said, 490 times, believe me, they past that amount long long ago
and keep going in filthy sins yes. Cause, they are not His true church.

And its no to you mattb.

Those missionaries, of back at the time when the Catholic Church was
really her, the true Church, they helped many to the true Faith. Go
read the Catholic Encyclopedia, look at the Friars. Pius XIIIth, was
one of them, that served in Japan to help those heathens learn about
Jesus and the truth.

And they built schools, and parks etc. Stuff a heathen culture never
had. Especially the church. Those Friars, so they suffered yes to do
so alot,
That is the reason Hiroshima took place, because those same heathens,
paid back the Church by crucifying 26 of them on crosses at once. The
United States was so angry about it, after the attack on pearl Harbor,
that they let it rip. That was the thanks the Friars got, Catholics
yes, for doing such hard word for our true Lord. Yes, crucified them
they did.

So do not bad mouth the name catholic. It only means, universal. You
must be careful How you think and do. So far, you just let it rip.
Watch what your tearing at. God will kick your ass if you go to far.

And they, were not thieves. Not like Jorge and his heathen buddies.
tesla sTinker
2020-02-08 22:05:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
No they sent them out to steal and kill.
God does not grant grace to sinners; until they repent. Doing Penance.
And that alone is not enough, yee must have sanctifying grace, not just
grace. And the sinner, cannot go and sin again. Just look at Rome, Jesus
said, 490 times, believe me, they past that amount long long ago and
keep going in filthy sins yes. Cause, they are not His true church.
And its no to you mattb.
Those missionaries, of back at the time when the Catholic Church was
really her, the true Church, they helped many to the true Faith. Go read
the Catholic Encyclopedia, look at the Friars. Pius XIIIth, was one of
them, that served in Japan to help those heathens learn about Jesus and
the truth.
And they built schools, and parks etc. Stuff a heathen culture never
had. Especially the church. Those Friars, so they suffered yes to do so
alot,
That is the reason Hiroshima took place, because those same heathens,
paid back the Church by crucifying 26 of them on crosses at once. The
United States was so angry about it, after the attack on pearl Harbor,
that they let it rip. That was the thanks the Friars got, Catholics yes,
for doing such hard word for our true Lord. Yes, crucified them they did.
So do not bad mouth the name catholic. It only means, universal. You
must be careful How you think and do. So far, you just let it rip.
Watch what your tearing at. God will kick your ass if you go to far.
And they, were not thieves. Not like Jorge and his heathen buddies.
war is a punishment for sins. Heathens like Jorge, and his freemason
buddies, use it to make money in their lies to everyone. And that is
why, they sit where they do. Antichrists full of sins. Not a dam one
of them, trusts in God. yet, look at what it says on the money. ?
While they put the books of the Bible, outside of the US courtrooms.
Labeling themselves as Hippocrates of the Declaration of Independence.
Breaking the true United States laws. It was, the only democracy
country in the world.

Nazis, you best believe it. Commys. That is what Hitler was all about
and the entire Bush Family. 911. What a number. The angels wars, will
not be over, until the second coming of My Jesus Christ. That, is when
you will have peace. And yet, they still, even to this day, tell you
they do not believe in hell. Just more freemasons lies. Cause, they
are the ones building it for you. And of course, they are not going to
get away with it. The Bible is really clear on the matter. Book of
Judges. Well, you can treat it like 911. Go and read it.
Robert
2020-02-09 03:01:14 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 13:41:09 -0800, tesla sTinker
Post by tesla sTinker
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
No they sent them out to steal and kill.
God does not grant grace to sinners; until they repent. Doing Penance.
And that alone is not enough, yee must have sanctifying grace, not just
grace. And the sinner, cannot go and sin again. Just look at Rome,
Jesus said, 490 times, believe me, they past that amount long long ago
and keep going in filthy sins yes. Cause, they are not His true church.
Incorrect. No one is required to repent as a conditions of their being
saved. None. How would a sinner know of what to repent without
conviction of the Holy Spirit.

You cannot possibly remember all your sins and what to repent of, and
should you die before you spent three months repenting you would go to
hell? Did God just jerk the carrot from the donkey?
Post by tesla sTinker
And its no to you mattb.
Those missionaries, of back at the time when the Catholic Church was
really her, the true Church, they helped many to the true Faith. Go
read the Catholic Encyclopedia, look at the Friars. Pius XIIIth, was
one of them, that served in Japan to help those heathens learn about
Jesus and the truth.
And they built schools, and parks etc. Stuff a heathen culture never
had. Especially the church. Those Friars, so they suffered yes to do
so alot,
That is the reason Hiroshima took place, because those same heathens,
paid back the Church by crucifying 26 of them on crosses at once. The
United States was so angry about it, after the attack on pearl Harbor,
that they let it rip. That was the thanks the Friars got, Catholics
yes, for doing such hard word for our true Lord. Yes, crucified them
they did.
So do not bad mouth the name catholic. It only means, universal. You
must be careful How you think and do. So far, you just let it rip.
Watch what your tearing at. God will kick your ass if you go to far.
And they, were not thieves. Not like Jorge and his heathen buddies.
Hiroshima did not take place because of the RC, Jesus did not come to
condemn but to save. Had Christ been carrying an a hammer to strike
people dead with then Saul would have been one of the first to be
destroyed. (The Saul of the NT who became Paul)

He would have utterly destroyed the RCC from off the planet for all
the people they killed during the dark ages, He would have destroyed
them because they burnt up all the bibles they could find at the time
and replaced them with the Vulgate. He would have destroyed them for
killing all the Believers who kept a bible in their house when the
Church said that they were the only ones to dispense the word of God.
God would have killed them for writing their own translations of the
Bible in order to have the Bible for themselves to see what the truth
of God was for themselves.

But there is a day coming where the Great Whore will be destroyed for
all her sin, and that is during the Great Tribulation that occurs
after the time of the Gentiles is over and the Church of God is
resurrected.

Is there a possibility that there are true believers of Jesus Christ
in the RCC today? Yes, if they are born again aka Born of God.
otherwise they are lost and are just playing religious games as taught
by the RCC.

Born Again as taught By Jesus, John and Peter.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
d***@cox.net
2020-02-09 15:03:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 13:41:09 -0800, tesla sTinker
Post by tesla sTinker
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
No they sent them out to steal and kill.
God does not grant grace to sinners; until they repent. Doing Penance.
And that alone is not enough, yee must have sanctifying grace, not just
grace. And the sinner, cannot go and sin again. Just look at Rome,
Jesus said, 490 times, believe me, they past that amount long long ago
and keep going in filthy sins yes. Cause, they are not His true church.
Incorrect. No one is required to repent as a conditions of their being
saved. None. How would a sinner know of what to repent without
conviction of the Holy Spirit.
This is why robert is a dumb prot/muslim.
the dukester, American-American
Patrick B
2020-02-09 15:29:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
No one is required to repent as a conditions of their being
saved. None. How would a sinner know of what to repent without
conviction of the Holy Spirit.
You cannot possibly remember all your sins and what to repent of, and
should you die before you spent three months repenting you would go to
hell? Did God just jerk the carrot from the donkey?
You are sooooooooooo full of shit.
d***@cox.net
2020-02-09 14:55:39 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 08 Feb 2020 13:41:09 -0800, tesla sTinker
Post by tesla sTinker
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
No they sent them out to steal and kill.
God does not grant grace to sinners; until they repent.
Well, there's your mistake. You got it backwards.

Grace (gratia, Charis), in general, is a supernatural gift of God to
intellectual creatures (men, angels) for their eternal salvation, whether the
latter be furthered and attained through salutary acts or a state of holiness.


the dukester, American-American
LinuxGal
2020-02-09 15:25:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Grace (gratia, Charis), in general, is a supernatural gift of God to
intellectual creatures (men, angels) for their eternal salvation, whether the
latter be furthered and attained through salutary acts or a state of holiness.
Posting the writings of others as though they were your own
is a sin.

https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/grace

What got you, Duke, is the word "salutary". I just can't
picture the bayou sheriff in Live And Let Die talking like that.
--
I have spoken.

https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
Rod B.
2020-02-09 15:51:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
No they sent them out to steal and kill.
Got some proof of that?
Robert
2020-02-09 00:12:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
He offers it through Christ AND grants is to sinners. Else no one
would get saved.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
You mean those padres who enslaved North, Central, and South American
Indians?

And just how does one instruct how to have the ability to become
followers of Christ, eh? Don't you know what the scripture says about
that? The Gospels?
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Lucifer
2020-02-09 02:28:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
He offers it through Christ AND grants is to sinners. Else no one
would get saved.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
You mean those padres who enslaved North, Central, and South American
Indians?
And just how does one instruct how to have the ability to become
followers of Christ, eh? Don't you know what the scripture says about
that? The Gospels?
Duke says God will not penalise those who do not receive the message
correctly, so we are all in the clear!
Kevrob
2020-02-09 04:35:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lucifer
Duke says God will not penalise those who do not receive the message
correctly, so we are all in the clear!
All of us?

I had 12 years of Catholic school religion and undergraduate-level
theology courses at a Jesuit university on my way to my B.A.
"I didn't get the memo" wouldn't work for me. "If you gave
me the brain I think with, why are you surprised I concluded
it was all bunk?!" would have to be my defense, in the extremely
unlikely event that there's anything like a Judgment Day.

Continuing the speculation, Yahooey will probably give Earl to
Ol' Nick to be boiled like a pot of crawdads, for being such a
prideful, judgmental asshole in a.a.

https://www.cajunwholesale.com/store/Boiling-Pots/Boiling-Pots-and-Equipment.html

Since none of that is real, except the boiling hardware, he's
in no danger of really being boiled.

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Patrick B
2020-02-09 15:55:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
No one is outside Grace, only God can grant grace and he grants it to
sinners as well.
He offers it. He doesn't "grant" it.
He offers it through Christ AND grants is to sinners. Else no one
would get saved.
Are you a sinner?
Post by Robert
Post by Patrick B
Post by Robert
Yet you are correct in that we cannot expect, nor should we expect the
Godless to behave like Christians. That is why there are laws of the
land set up for normal behavior and those laws vary from culture to
culture.
And that is why the Catholics sent missionaries out - to offer the
instruction and ability to beome followers of Christ.
You mean those padres who enslaved North, Central, and South American
Indians?
Which ones were those?
Post by Robert
And just how does one instruct how to have the ability to become
followers of Christ, eh? Don't you know what the scripture says about
that? The Gospels?
Indigenous people do not have the Gospels written in their language.
How in the world will they learn them?

Mattb
2020-02-08 20:44:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
I am glad that you agree.
We may disagree on the special status of Catholics Church but on
this we do.
Special status of Catholics?
Well if a Catholic and a non-Catholic do the exact same thing (wrong)
you have shown only the non-Catholic is worthy of correction.
Okay. I naturally assume that a Catholic will know better than to
do something like that because if he did it deliberately then it's
a sin to death, and what can I say to some that doesn't care about
themselves enough to avoid doing that? They won't care for others.
Read the verses below to understand what I'm saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Heb 10:26  For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the
knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
Heb 10:27  But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery
indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
Heb 10:28  He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or
Heb 10:29  Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought
worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the
blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and
hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
But some one who is not a Catholic and outside of Grace I would not
expect that they know or understand this, so it's right to warn them
against doing it again as their act may not have been deliberate.
Wouldn't you believe it is more wrong before God for a person to
knowingly disobey?

Do you follow all the Jewish laws?
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
You lost me there Matt, I'm not sure
of what you are referring too..?
Patrick B
2020-02-07 22:51:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
I am glad that you agree.
We may disagree on the special status of Catholics Church but on
this we do.
Special status of Catholics? You lost me there Matt, I'm not sure
of what you are referring too..?
His passive aggressive style jumps out once again.
He needs attention.
Mattb
2020-02-08 20:49:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her.
No. People like Nancy Pelosi act as one of the checks and balances
that the founding fathers sought to create to prevent one party from
passing legislation that could be harmful to millions of Americans.
I can see that you believe Trump but let me assure you that Trump can
and will lie to your face just as he did last night about medicare and
social security. Trump and McConnell have tried twice this year to cut
social security benefits to the elderly. They were not able to do so
thanks to a healthy balance of democrats in office to stop their
legislation from passing the house.
I am a constant pain in congresses butt when it comes to social
security, medicare and spending on the military and I will continue
to be active engaged to protect those programs.
The programs you mentioned should be protected.
I am glad that you agree.
We may disagree on the special status of Catholics Church but on
this we do.
Special status of Catholics? You lost me there Matt, I'm not sure
of what you are referring too..?
His passive aggressive style jumps out once again.
Patrick Barker you are just mad because I oppose child molestation
to which you support, if done by a Catholic such as yourself.
Post by Patrick B
He needs attention.
No Patrick I don't I actually post under 2 Nyms now so I can have
talks without you following me around.

I ask questions your kind don't like it seems. You get backed into a
corner and can't defend your belief system and it's traditions. Then
you get personal and make shit up because you lack the skills and
intelligence to do more.
Davej
2020-02-05 14:38:56 UTC
Permalink
Pelosi...
Deserves a cookie for not wacking Trump upside the back of his head.
Jack Shit
2020-02-05 19:09:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Davej
Pelosi...
Deserves a cookie for not wacking Trump upside the back of his head.
She needs to drink herself to death. No wonder San Francisco is such a
shithole.
viva padrepio
2020-02-06 01:23:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Davej
Pelosi...
Deserves a cookie for not wacking Trump upside the back of his head.
I would've grabbed Pelosi by the woo-woo and never let go. :-D
Kevrob
2020-02-06 02:14:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by viva padrepio
Post by Davej
Pelosi...
Deserves a cookie for not wacking Trump upside the back of his head.
I would've grabbed Pelosi by the woo-woo and never let go. :-D
How much penance would you get for that, "padre?"

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Miloch
2020-02-05 15:29:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
I love her!...like Representative Maxine Waters, she's totally
unafraid/unimpressed with the fat-fuck Impeached Grifter-in-Chief taking up
space in the oval office.


*
Post by Michael Christ
Who voted her to be above that office??
Dear Lord, Pagan Rome Has Reborn In America
2020-02-05 18:34:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Miloch
Post by Miloch
I love her!...like Representative Maxine Waters, she's totally
unafraid/unimpressed with the fat-fuck Impeached Grifter-in-Chief taking up
space in the oval office.
If the choice is between Maxine Waters and Trump, I think I'd have to move to Canada. Or get rid of them both and start over.
Too many faggots there?
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-05 20:04:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dear Lord, Pagan Rome Has Reborn In America
Too many faggots there?
Again with the gay fantasies?

Just come out.
You'll be the belle of the ball.

Wear that pink outfit hiding in your closet.
They Lean On Founding Fathers' Misunderstanding
2020-02-05 20:16:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by Dear Lord, Pagan Rome Has Reborn In America
Too many faggots there?
Again with the gay fantasies?
Just come out.
You'll be the belle of the ball.
Wear that pink outfit hiding in your closet.
I thought you said America was a free country? Why would I be hiding some depravity which is socially accepted by the majority?
SEE HOW DUMB YOU ARE?
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-05 23:29:00 UTC
Permalink
Suffice it to say you're an obvious latent homosexual.
Nobody else makes so many homophobic comments, which is a sign you're latent.
If you think its depravity of course you'd pretend not to be gay.
You seem to have it so seamless, Hobs.
I used to read a lot.

What's your experience?
michellemalkingmail.com
2020-02-06 15:45:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Miloch
Post by Miloch
I love her!...like Representative Maxine Waters, she's totally
unafraid/unimpressed with the fat-fuck Impeached Grifter-in-Chief taking up
space in the oval office.
If the choice is between Maxine Waters and Trump, I think I'd have to move to Canada. Or get rid of them both and start over.
So, you're both a sexist and a racist. I agree with Milloch.
Kevrob
2020-02-06 17:15:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by michellemalkingmail.com
Post by Miloch
Post by Miloch
I love her!...like Representative Maxine Waters, she's totally
unafraid/unimpressed with the fat-fuck Impeached Grifter-in-Chief taking up
space in the oval office.
If the choice is between Maxine Waters and Trump, I think I'd have to move to Canada. Or get rid of them both and start over.
So, you're both a sexist and a racist. I agree with Milloch.
If a white congressMAN said the stupid things Ms Waters has,
I'd be no fonder of him. She's a member of the Congressional
Progressive Caucus, so it shouldn't surprise you that Libertarians
like Hobbit, or myself, don't like her policies.

Please note that the last Republican I voted for was Gerald Ford,
back in 1976. I have no love for Trump. I don't give passes
to pols who back evil ideas because they happen to be of a
particular race, creed, gender, sexual orientation or party.

That doesn't mean I'm moving to a country that hasn't won a
Stanley Cup since 1993!

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Jack Shit
2020-02-05 19:07:07 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
Rod B.
2020-02-05 19:31:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.

It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
Jack Shit
2020-02-05 19:48:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary. She has caused grief and pain in many peoples lives over
political bullshit. <Kavanaugh>...

Fuck her and her crew. Anyone who would do as she did last night is
not fit to be serving this country in any way. If you agree with her
than you should be shot too.

So sue me.
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-05 20:09:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jack Shit
Fuck her and her crew. Anyone who would do as she did last night is
not fit to be serving this country in any way. If you agree with her
than you should be shot too.

Its not about liking or approving, its about her right to freedom of expression. She has it too.

I can't stand her but she has the right to express herself as does everyone else.

She represents her district to the satisfaction of her district or they wouldn't keep reflecting her.
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-05 20:09:48 UTC
Permalink
Make that re-electing her.
Rod B.
2020-02-05 20:30:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place. The
hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation apart.
Post by Jack Shit
She has caused grief and pain in many peoples lives over
political bullshit. <Kavanaugh>...
And you suggesting that she be murdered over politics makes you
so much better??
Post by Jack Shit
Fuck her and her crew. Anyone who would do as she did last night is
not fit to be serving this country in any way.
I liked the speech and was encouraged by several things that
I heard, and I hope that they were not lies so I am doing
some fact checking.
Post by Jack Shit
If you agree with her
than you should be shot too.
Who knows? I may end up agreeing with her in the end
so just as a precaution I am going to order a copy of
Trumps speech so that should I have a sudden impulse
I'll have something to tear up!
Post by Jack Shit
So sue me.
No thanks. I'll just turn your post over to the feds
and let them do the suing..
Robert
2020-02-05 20:50:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place. The
hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation apart.
Her hatred as well as that of her crew was there six months before he
was inaugurated. They vowed to impeach him before he was even
President and they haven't ceased yet. And from what they said they
aren't going to.

They have made so many false charges against him it isn't even funny.
You might not like his style, but He IS President. And SHE SHOULD have
respected his Office. She started the whole speech off without
recognizing him properly and she should be impeached herself and
censored as un American, and some serious charges should be levied
against her for not having impeached Bidden when he was in office for
his crimes. Nobody treated Clinton like that and they respected his
office.

Her and her crew showed all be sent up the river for their un American
activities. Turn me into the Feds too while you are at it.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
She has caused grief and pain in many peoples lives over
political bullshit. <Kavanaugh>...
And you suggesting that she be murdered over politics makes you
so much better??
Post by Jack Shit
Fuck her and her crew. Anyone who would do as she did last night is
not fit to be serving this country in any way.
I liked the speech and was encouraged by several things that
I heard, and I hope that they were not lies so I am doing
some fact checking.
Post by Jack Shit
If you agree with her
than you should be shot too.
Who knows? I may end up agreeing with her in the end
so just as a precaution I am going to order a copy of
Trumps speech so that should I have a sudden impulse
I'll have something to tear up!
Post by Jack Shit
So sue me.
No thanks. I'll just turn your post over to the feds
and let them do the suing..
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Rod B.
2020-02-05 22:23:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place. The
hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation apart.
Her hatred as well as that of her crew was there six months before he
was inaugurated. They vowed to impeach him before he was even
President and they haven't ceased yet. And from what they said they
aren't going to.
They have made so many false charges against him it isn't even funny.
You might not like his style, but He IS President. And SHE SHOULD have
respected his Office. She started the whole speech off without
recognizing him properly and she should be impeached herself and
censored as un American, and some serious charges should be levied
against her for not having impeached Bidden when he was in office for
his crimes. Nobody treated Clinton like that and they respected his
office.
Her and her crew showed all be sent up the river for their un American
activities. Turn me into the Feds too while you are at it.
Why? Do you think murder is acceptable as well? Sounds to me as if
you threw the baby Jesus out the window with the bath water! So much for
your peace of mind..
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
She has caused grief and pain in many peoples lives over
political bullshit. <Kavanaugh>...
And you suggesting that she be murdered over politics makes you
so much better??
Post by Jack Shit
Fuck her and her crew. Anyone who would do as she did last night is
not fit to be serving this country in any way.
I liked the speech and was encouraged by several things that
I heard, and I hope that they were not lies so I am doing
some fact checking.
Post by Jack Shit
If you agree with her
than you should be shot too.
Who knows? I may end up agreeing with her in the end
so just as a precaution I am going to order a copy of
Trumps speech so that should I have a sudden impulse
I'll have something to tear up!
Post by Jack Shit
So sue me.
No thanks. I'll just turn your post over to the feds
and let them do the suing..
Robert
2020-02-05 23:18:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place. The
hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation apart.
Her hatred as well as that of her crew was there six months before he
was inaugurated. They vowed to impeach him before he was even
President and they haven't ceased yet. And from what they said they
aren't going to.
They have made so many false charges against him it isn't even funny.
You might not like his style, but He IS President. And SHE SHOULD have
respected his Office. She started the whole speech off without
recognizing him properly and she should be impeached herself and
censored as un American, and some serious charges should be levied
against her for not having impeached Bidden when he was in office for
his crimes. Nobody treated Clinton like that and they respected his
office.
Her and her crew showed all be sent up the river for their un American
activities. Turn me into the Feds too while you are at it.
Why? Do you think murder is acceptable as well? Sounds to me as if
you threw the baby Jesus out the window with the bath water! So much for
your peace of mind..
Why? Because if you threaten to take someone and turn them in so
glibly then why wouldn't you take what I said in the same vein of
thought? That people here threaten so lightly using the FBI like duke
did, and others in their ways, then just toss me to the wolves as
well.

Your additional accusation are just as ridiculous and do little more
than show the state of your heart.

As an American I see that Pelosi who said at one time she was against
the impeachment and then turned face I would not be unhappy if she and
the fellow accusers were all charged as subversives and be treated
accordingly as you would any treasonous persons.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
She has caused grief and pain in many peoples lives over
political bullshit. <Kavanaugh>...
And you suggesting that she be murdered over politics makes you
so much better??
Post by Jack Shit
Fuck her and her crew. Anyone who would do as she did last night is
not fit to be serving this country in any way.
I liked the speech and was encouraged by several things that
I heard, and I hope that they were not lies so I am doing
some fact checking.
Post by Jack Shit
If you agree with her
than you should be shot too.
Who knows? I may end up agreeing with her in the end
so just as a precaution I am going to order a copy of
Trumps speech so that should I have a sudden impulse
I'll have something to tear up!
Post by Jack Shit
So sue me.
No thanks. I'll just turn your post over to the feds
and let them do the suing..
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Robert
2020-02-06 00:51:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place. The
hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation apart.
Her hatred as well as that of her crew was there six months before he
was inaugurated. They vowed to impeach him before he was even
President and they haven't ceased yet. And from what they said they
aren't going to.
They have made so many false charges against him it isn't even funny.
You might not like his style, but He IS President. And SHE SHOULD have
respected his Office. She started the whole speech off without
recognizing him properly and she should be impeached herself and
censored as un American, and some serious charges should be levied
against her for not having impeached Bidden when he was in office for
his crimes. Nobody treated Clinton like that and they respected his
office.
Her and her crew showed all be sent up the river for their un American
activities. Turn me into the Feds too while you are at it.
Why? Do you think murder is acceptable as well? Sounds to me as if
you threw the baby Jesus out the window with the bath water! So much for
your peace of mind..
Why? Because if you threaten to take someone and turn them in so
glibly then why wouldn't you take what I said in the same vein of
thought? That people here threaten so lightly using the FBI like duke
did, and others in their ways, then just toss me to the wolves as
well.
I have not. You would do well to meditate on separating your feelings
from your judgement and find peace.
I am totally at peace. I feel fine being one with myself and not being
a two faced person.
--
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6 KJV)
Rod B.
2020-02-06 02:14:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Robert
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place. The
hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation apart.
Her hatred as well as that of her crew was there six months before he
was inaugurated. They vowed to impeach him before he was even
President and they haven't ceased yet. And from what they said they
aren't going to.
They have made so many false charges against him it isn't even funny.
You might not like his style, but He IS President. And SHE SHOULD have
respected his Office. She started the whole speech off without
recognizing him properly and she should be impeached herself and
censored as un American, and some serious charges should be levied
against her for not having impeached Bidden when he was in office for
his crimes. Nobody treated Clinton like that and they respected his
office.
Her and her crew showed all be sent up the river for their un American
activities. Turn me into the Feds too while you are at it.
Why? Do you think murder is acceptable as well? Sounds to me as if
you threw the baby Jesus out the window with the bath water! So much for
your peace of mind..
Why? Because if you threaten to take someone and turn them in so
glibly then why wouldn't you take what I said in the same vein of
thought? That people here threaten so lightly using the FBI like duke
did, and others in their ways, then just toss me to the wolves as
well.
I have not. You would do well to meditate on separating your feelings
from your judgement and find peace.
I am totally at peace. I feel fine being one with myself and not being
a two faced person.
Not my place to say..I don't have to live with you.
Rod B.
2020-02-06 00:27:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place. The
hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation apart.
So, what is the solution?
Throw all the jerks out of office?
Work together. Try to understand what others want and need and why
they want it or need it. The political philosophies have resolved
nothing and turned people against one another as foretold By Jesus.

Prayer and fasting are the answers. If people are sincere than God
may restore things. If they are not sincere then they are on the brink
of seeing their nation destroyed.

The choice rests with the people.
Patrick B
2020-02-06 14:56:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place. The
hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation apart.
So, what is the solution?
Throw all the jerks out of office?
Work together. Try to understand what others want and need and why
they want it or need it. The political philosophies have resolved
nothing and turned people against one another as foretold By Jesus.
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
Rod B.
2020-02-06 18:10:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed it's
scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place. The
hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation apart.
So, what is the solution?
Throw all the jerks out of office?
Work together. Try to understand what others want and need and why
they want it or need it. The political philosophies have resolved
nothing and turned people against one another as foretold By Jesus.
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
Patrick B
2020-02-06 21:35:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-07 02:33:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Why do you lie so much?




Obama Reaches Out for McCain’s Counsel
Jan. 18, 2009

WASHINGTON: Not long after Senator John McCain
returned last month from an official trip to
Iraq and Pakistan, he received a phone call from
President-elect Barack Obama.
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/19/us/politics/19mccain.html
Patrick B
2020-02-07 14:35:11 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 20:33:17 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Why do you lie so much?
Obama Reaches Out for McCain’s Counsel
Jan. 18, 2009
WASHINGTON: Not long after Senator John McCain
returned last month from an official trip to
Iraq and Pakistan, he received a phone call from
President-elect Barack Obama.
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/19/us/politics/19mccain.html
Obama snubbed me, says McCain
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/232693-president-obama-snubbed-me-says-john-mccain
Rod B.
2020-02-07 18:02:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Yeah..I recall that, but Obama was a lousy president. He never should
have run for that office.
Mattb
2020-02-07 20:10:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Yeah..I recall that, but Obama was a lousy president. He never should
have run for that office.
In the last 20 years have we had a good president? By the looks of
our future choices all we can have is a lousy president. The only one
I even half way like is Pete.
Rod B.
2020-02-07 20:57:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Yeah..I recall that, but Obama was a lousy president. He never should
have run for that office.
In the last 20 years have we had a good president?
That might depend on what others feel makes a good president. Trump
has done wonders getting the economy on it's feet and growing and he has
scared the pants off of many of the nations enemies, but as a human
being he's in the toilet.
Post by Mattb
By the looks of
our future choices all we can have is a lousy president.
Look at it this way...at least we haven't had a Stalin or a Papa "Doc"
Duvalier yet!




The only one
Post by Mattb
I even half way like is Pete.
Mattb
2020-02-07 22:34:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Yeah..I recall that, but Obama was a lousy president. He never should
have run for that office.
In the last 20 years have we had a good president?
That might depend on what others feel makes a good president. Trump
has done wonders getting the economy on it's feet and growing and he has
scared the pants off of many of the nations enemies, but as a human
being he's in the toilet.
By the looks of his hair maybe he washes it in a toilet.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
By the looks of
our future choices all we can have is a lousy president.
Look at it this way...at least we haven't had a Stalin or a Papa "Doc"
Duvalier yet!
They key word is Yet. The likes of Sanders now have his antifa
goons or blackshirts.
Post by Rod B.
The only one
Post by Mattb
I even half way like is Pete.
Rod B.
2020-02-08 00:02:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Yeah..I recall that, but Obama was a lousy president. He never should
have run for that office.
In the last 20 years have we had a good president?
That might depend on what others feel makes a good president. Trump
has done wonders getting the economy on it's feet and growing and he has
scared the pants off of many of the nations enemies, but as a human
being he's in the toilet.
By the looks of his hair maybe he washes it in a toilet.
OMG!! It's a comb over. Trump has thinning hair and he is covering
a bald spot.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Mattb
By the looks of
our future choices all we can have is a lousy president.
Look at it this way...at least we haven't had a Stalin or a Papa "Doc"
Duvalier yet!
They key word is Yet. The likes of Sanders now have his antifa
goons or blackshirts.
Post by Rod B.
The only one
Post by Mattb
I even half way like is Pete.
Patrick B
2020-02-07 22:43:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Yeah..I recall that, but Obama was a lousy president. He never should
have run for that office.
In the last 20 years have we had a good president? By the looks of
our future choices all we can have is a lousy president. The only one
I even half way like is Pete.
You like the gay guy, huh?
Mattb
2020-02-08 00:09:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Yeah..I recall that, but Obama was a lousy president. He never should
have run for that office.
In the last 20 years have we had a good president? By the looks of
our future choices all we can have is a lousy president. The only one
I even half way like is Pete.
You like the gay guy, huh?
Like his policies better. I don't vote based on religion.
Patrick B
2020-02-08 15:23:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mattb
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
Pelosi and Schumer couldn't get over the fact that hillery lost, and
they just refused to work with their folks across the aisle.
Then maxine, patricia lee, and a few others started immediately on the
impeachment process.
This is what takes place when people in both parties want everything
their way.
I agree.
Do you recall when John McCain went to the White house to discuss
items with Obama right after he was re-elected? Obama told him that
McCain lost and he could leave.
Yeah..I recall that, but Obama was a lousy president. He never should
have run for that office.
In the last 20 years have we had a good president? By the looks of
our future choices all we can have is a lousy president. The only one
I even half way like is Pete.
You like the gay guy, huh?
Like his policies better. I don't vote based on religion.
You better hope he gets the nomination nod.
He is somewhat good looking, and you know how them dems like to vote:
for good looking, young men (like JFK), who speak well. The speaking
part is a major point for him. Like obammay. He could speak well,
and he was groomed for the office. And, if he picks a colored woman
as his VP, he might have a good shot.

And don't whine about "colored." It could be any color.
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-06 19:32:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Rod B.
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
Post by Rod B.
Post by Jack Shit
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:16:22 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the
United States of America, then she rips up the speech of the
President of the United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of
the United States, she's a disgrace to the government of the
United States of America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle
happens to the contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal
advertising' has impacted the people as the leaders of your
nation have set a new-low norm of disrespect! Good luck with
that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a
godless world who has turned its back on the Lord and their
only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in
himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own
lives, That men and women don't have what it takes to take
charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or
make some stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads
up your asses and saying, nothing to smell here folks.
She is a cunt who needs to be shot.
She needs to be protected from people like you,
and you should be jailed for suggesting that
she be deprived of her life.
It is always a guy like you that willingly deprives
others of the same rights that he takes for granted.
So you approve of her actions? You losing libs are so brainwashed
it's scary.
I'm not a liberal nor a conservative. I'm not attached to either
philosophy, but I can see clearly what has been taking place.
The hatred that each holds for the other is tearing the nation
apart.
So, what is the solution?
Throw all the jerks out of office?
Work together. Try to understand what others want and need and why
they want it or need it. The political philosophies have resolved
nothing and turned people against one another as foretold By Jesus.
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
And your proof of this is.........?
Patrick B
2020-02-06 21:49:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He said
he would sign anything they worked out together.
And your proof of this is.........?
How much proof do you need?

https://kdkaradio.radio.com/articles/trump-invites-pelosi-schumer-white-house

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/schumer-pelosi-invited-back-white-house-after-standing-trump-n826316

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/13/trump-will-have-dinner-with-schumer-and-pelosi-on-wednesday-night.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qdMJvAph5M

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/04/schumer-pelosi-will-meet-with-trump-after-canceling-previous-meeting.html

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-says-congress-must-fix-immigration/

https://www.mediaite.com/online/schumer-and-pelosi-decline-trumps-white-house-invite-we-pass-on-show-meeting/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PIsTIafhJY

http://www.talkmedianews.com/featured/2017/11/28/schumer-pelosi-back-white-house-meeting-trump/
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-07 02:29:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He
said he would sign anything they worked out together.
And your proof of this is.........?
How much proof do you need?
https://kdkaradio.radio.com/articles/trump-invites-pelosi-schumer-white
-house
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/schumer-pelosi-invited-ba
ck-white-house-after-standing-trump-n826316
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/13/trump-will-have-dinner-with-schumer-and
-pelosi-on-wednesday-night.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qdMJvAph5M
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/04/schumer-pelosi-will-meet-with-trump-aft
er-canceling-previous-meeting.html
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-says-congress-must-fix-immigrat
ion/
https://www.mediaite.com/online/schumer-and-pelosi-decline-trumps-white
-house-invite-we-pass-on-show-meeting/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PIsTIafhJY
http://www.talkmedianews.com/featured/2017/11/28/schumer-pelosi-back-wh
ite-house-meeting-trump/
"First weeks in office", you say?

The above link is about a meeting
in November 28, 2017 - TEN MONTHS into
the Trump administration.
Patrick B
2020-02-07 14:36:33 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 20:29:37 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He
said he would sign anything they worked out together.
And your proof of this is.........?
How much proof do you need?
https://kdkaradio.radio.com/articles/trump-invites-pelosi-schumer-white
-house
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/schumer-pelosi-invited-ba
ck-white-house-after-standing-trump-n826316
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/13/trump-will-have-dinner-with-schumer-and
-pelosi-on-wednesday-night.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qdMJvAph5M
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/04/schumer-pelosi-will-meet-with-trump-aft
er-canceling-previous-meeting.html
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-says-congress-must-fix-immigrat
ion/
https://www.mediaite.com/online/schumer-and-pelosi-decline-trumps-white
-house-invite-we-pass-on-show-meeting/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PIsTIafhJY
http://www.talkmedianews.com/featured/2017/11/28/schumer-pelosi-back-wh
ite-house-meeting-trump/
"First weeks in office", you say?
The above link is about a meeting
in November 28, 2017 - TEN MONTHS into
the Trump administration.
Not all of them.
I am showing you that Trump reached out several times to the dems.
And the dems were already busy working on his impeachment.
You see.............. hillery lost.
Rod B.
2020-02-07 18:05:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 20:29:37 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He
said he would sign anything they worked out together.
And your proof of this is.........?
How much proof do you need?
https://kdkaradio.radio.com/articles/trump-invites-pelosi-schumer-white
-house
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/schumer-pelosi-invited-ba
ck-white-house-after-standing-trump-n826316
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/13/trump-will-have-dinner-with-schumer-and
-pelosi-on-wednesday-night.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qdMJvAph5M
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/04/schumer-pelosi-will-meet-with-trump-aft
er-canceling-previous-meeting.html
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-says-congress-must-fix-immigrat
ion/
https://www.mediaite.com/online/schumer-and-pelosi-decline-trumps-white
-house-invite-we-pass-on-show-meeting/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PIsTIafhJY
http://www.talkmedianews.com/featured/2017/11/28/schumer-pelosi-back-wh
ite-house-meeting-trump/
"First weeks in office", you say?
The above link is about a meeting
in November 28, 2017 - TEN MONTHS into
the Trump administration.
Not all of them.
I am showing you that Trump reached out several times to the dems.
And the dems were already busy working on his impeachment.
You see.............. hillery lost.
Talk about a cold blooded snake in the grass...
Patrick B
2020-02-07 22:47:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod B.
Post by Patrick B
I am showing you that Trump reached out several times to the dems.
And the dems were already busy working on his impeachment.
You see.............. hillery lost.
Talk about a cold blooded snake in the grass...
Yes, I agree: Patricia Lee, Maxine Waters, Nadler, Schiff, pelosi,
etc.
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-07 18:23:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick B
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 20:29:37 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He
said he would sign anything they worked out together.
And your proof of this is.........?
How much proof do you need?
https://kdkaradio.radio.com/articles/trump-invites-pelosi-schumer-
white
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
-house
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/schumer-pelosi-invited-
ba
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
ck-white-house-after-standing-trump-n826316
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/13/trump-will-have-dinner-with-schumer-
and
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
-pelosi-on-wednesday-night.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qdMJvAph5M
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/04/schumer-pelosi-will-meet-with-trump-
aft
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
er-canceling-previous-meeting.html
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-says-congress-must-fix-
immigrat
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
ion/
https://www.mediaite.com/online/schumer-and-pelosi-decline-trumps-
white
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
-house-invite-we-pass-on-show-meeting/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PIsTIafhJY
http://www.talkmedianews.com/featured/2017/11/28/schumer-pelosi-back-
wh
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
ite-house-meeting-trump/
"First weeks in office", you say?
The above link is about a meeting
in November 28, 2017 - TEN MONTHS into
the Trump administration.
Not all of them.
I am showing you that Trump reached out several times to the dems.
And the dems were already busy working on his impeachment.
Huh?

Let's see your proof of THAT one.......
Patrick B
2020-02-07 22:50:00 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 12:23:39 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Patrick B
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 20:29:37 -0600, Mitchell Holman
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration, he
invited the leaders of both parties to come to the white house and
asked if they could work together and come up with meaningful
legislation on healthcare, guns, and illegal alien crossings. He
said he would sign anything they worked out together.
And your proof of this is.........?
How much proof do you need?
https://kdkaradio.radio.com/articles/trump-invites-pelosi-schumer-
white
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
-house
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/schumer-pelosi-invited-
ba
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
ck-white-house-after-standing-trump-n826316
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/13/trump-will-have-dinner-with-schumer-
and
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
-pelosi-on-wednesday-night.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qdMJvAph5M
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/04/schumer-pelosi-will-meet-with-trump-
aft
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
er-canceling-previous-meeting.html
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-says-congress-must-fix-
immigrat
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
ion/
https://www.mediaite.com/online/schumer-and-pelosi-decline-trumps-
white
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
-house-invite-we-pass-on-show-meeting/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PIsTIafhJY
http://www.talkmedianews.com/featured/2017/11/28/schumer-pelosi-back-
wh
Post by Patrick B
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Patrick B
ite-house-meeting-trump/
"First weeks in office", you say?
The above link is about a meeting
in November 28, 2017 - TEN MONTHS into
the Trump administration.
Not all of them.
I am showing you that Trump reached out several times to the dems.
And the dems were already busy working on his impeachment.
Huh?
Let's see your proof of THAT one.......
Obama snubbed me, says McCain
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/232693-president-obama-snubbed-me-says-john-mccain

In a 2009 op-ed, former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) described McCain as
Obama’s “ace in the hole.”

Santorum’s analysis seemed prescient when Obama honored McCain at a
candlelight dinner before taking the oath of office.

McCain, however, said the gesture was not backed up by actions.

“This idea that this president or his people reached out to me is
patently false,” he said. “To somehow allege that I didn’t somehow
respond to their overtures, that’s patently false. That’s their
narrative, and I understand their narrative, but it’s not
substantiated by the facts.”

McCain pointed out that Obama invited him to the White House in 2009
to discuss immigration reform.

“I said, ‘I’d love to join you,’ and never heard from him,” McCain
said.

A White House spokeswoman declined to comment.

Instead of helping Obama lay the groundwork for bipartisan
coalition-building, McCain galvanized Senate Republican opposition to
the 2009 stimulus package and the 2010 healthcare reform proposal.
Davej
2020-02-06 22:31:07 UTC
Permalink
[...]
If you recall the first week weeks in Trumps administration...
This is Donald Trump:

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/
k***@gmail.com
2020-02-05 23:49:13 UTC
Permalink
There are more important things here, thausands miles from USA. I am looking outside this TV Drama . I suppose you think all is around you. You should know there is a whole world outside you.

KRYOEL
Kevrob
2020-02-06 00:21:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by k***@gmail.com
There are more important things here, thausands miles from USA. I am looking outside this TV Drama . I suppose you think all is around you. You should know there is a whole world outside you.
KRYOEL
The trolling OP is posting from Tasmania. If US
citizens don't like the impeachment result, we can
vote for somebody else in November.

I could give UK voters advice on Brexit, should they ever
ask me. I doubt they will. so I'll hold my peace. The
same goes for the Sussex kerfuffle.

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Michael Christ
2020-02-06 02:03:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by k***@gmail.com
There are more important things here, thausands miles from USA.
And strangely the mere statement will suffice. :-).

Thank you, Lordess Krap.




Michael Christ




I am looking outside this TV Drama . I suppose you think all is around
you. You should know there is a whole world outside you.
Post by k***@gmail.com
KRYOEL
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
michellemalkingmail.com
2020-02-06 15:28:23 UTC
Permalink
Yes, Trump is a total disgrace to the USA.
Michael Christ
2020-02-06 20:56:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by michellemalkingmail.com
Yes, Trump is a total disgrace to the USA.
Never mind Trump or anyone else, you are an utter disgrace and you will
stand before the Lord and give account for fucking up the life He gave
by serving yourself.

In the life to come, you get you, and none of the things you take for
granted now!

No thanks are necessary.




Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
John Locke
2020-02-06 21:17:09 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:56:32 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Post by michellemalkingmail.com
Yes, Trump is a total disgrace to the USA.
Never mind Trump or anyone else, you are an utter disgrace and you will
stand before the Lord and give account for fucking up the life He gave
by serving yourself.
In the life to come, you get you, and none of the things you take for
granted now!
No thanks are necessary.
...Stevie, you're an utter disgrace. Attributing the emergence of
human life to some silly, imaginary god is highly disrespectful of
nature. The upside for you is that you won't have to give account
to the worms...just your dead carcass ! Alas, that's all there is for
you after death. I'd say enjoy but you won't know you're dead.
Michael Christ
2020-02-06 21:42:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Locke
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:56:32 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Post by michellemalkingmail.com
Yes, Trump is a total disgrace to the USA.
Never mind Trump or anyone else, you are an utter disgrace and you will
stand before the Lord and give account for fucking up the life He gave
by serving yourself.
In the life to come, you get you, and none of the things you take for
granted now!
No thanks are necessary.
...Stevie, you're an utter disgrace. Attributing the emergence of
human life to some silly, imaginary god is highly disrespectful of
nature. The upside for you is that you won't have to give account
to the worms...just your dead carcass ! Alas, that's all there is for
you after death. I'd say enjoy but you won't know you're dead.
Do I say proof, evidence, right here, or is it not now?? :-). You're a
talking head, Locke.

An Eternal Creator makes your stupidity of 'everything made itself' look
like a dead duck that was never there, Bucky. :-).

'Eeeeeeeeeemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmerrrrrrrrrrgence! Yeah baby!!! :-).
You sound like that idiot Gertrude Kevrob!!

Atheist emergence from what...don't know...don't matta...sounds good!!
:-))))))))))).





Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Jack Shit
2020-02-06 22:01:50 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 13:17:09 -0800, John Locke
Post by John Locke
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:56:32 +1100, Michael Christ
Post by Michael Christ
Post by michellemalkingmail.com
Yes, Trump is a total disgrace to the USA.
Never mind Trump or anyone else, you are an utter disgrace and you will
stand before the Lord and give account for fucking up the life He gave
by serving yourself.
In the life to come, you get you, and none of the things you take for
granted now!
No thanks are necessary.
...Stevie, you're an utter disgrace. Attributing the emergence of
human life to some silly, imaginary god is highly disrespectful of
nature. The upside for you is that you won't have to give account
to the worms...just your dead carcass ! Alas, that's all there is for
you after death. I'd say enjoy but you won't know you're dead.
yet in your heart you really don't know if there is a God or not.
Davej
2020-02-06 21:59:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by michellemalkingmail.com
Yes, Trump is a total disgrace to the USA.
Never mind Trump or anyone else, you are an utter disgrace and you will
stand before the Lord and give account for fucking up the life He gave
by serving yourself.
Yeah, the imaginary "lord" needs to be "served" and these
kooks pretend to know how to do that. They claim to have
magically determined that the "lord" is actually the
Jewish Yahweh Monster, so obviously you can simply read
Exodus to know that you need to collect gold, silver, brass,
blue, purple, scarlet, fine linen, goat hair, ram skins
(dyed red), badger skins, shittim wood, oil, spices,
incense (sweet), onyx stones, and other stones appropriate
for a breastplate.
Jack Shit
2020-02-06 22:07:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Davej
Post by Michael Christ
Post by michellemalkingmail.com
Yes, Trump is a total disgrace to the USA.
Never mind Trump or anyone else, you are an utter disgrace and you will
stand before the Lord and give account for fucking up the life He gave
by serving yourself.
Yeah, the imaginary "lord" needs to be "served" and these
kooks pretend to know how to do that. They claim to have
magically determined that the "lord" is actually the
Jewish Yahweh Monster, so obviously you can simply read
Exodus to know that you need to collect gold, silver, brass,
blue, purple, scarlet, fine linen, goat hair, ram skins
(dyed red), badger skins, shittim wood, oil, spices,
incense (sweet), onyx stones, and other stones appropriate
for a breastplate.
But just before you die you will admit you really don't know if there
is a God but will hope there is.
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-07 01:02:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Never mind Trump or anyone else, you are an utter disgrace and you will
stand before the Lord and give account for fucking up the life He gave
by serving yourself.
Post by Michael Christ
In the life to come, you get you, and none of the things you take for
granted now!
Post by Michael Christ
No thanks are necessary.
Yet another threefer.

3 ideas that are your beliefs and therefore can't be proven.

Everything is belief and beliefs can't be proven.
MX.

If nothing can be proven, then there's no reason to discuss the issues.

Or have you changed your mind?
Michael Christ
2020-02-07 04:30:42 UTC
Permalink
'Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief'. That is not going
to change for your misdirection, Goofy.

You get to choose what you believe is true, you shallow moron.

No excuses.



Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
ravn
2020-02-06 21:50:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
You need to get rid of her.
Trump is the problem. What you're on about here is just more of the same nonsense that always coming out of your ass.
Michael Christ
2020-02-06 22:00:08 UTC
Permalink
The deceitful snaky gargoyle cum drenched snipper Ravn has been snipped.



Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
ravn
2020-02-08 00:18:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
The deceitful snaky gargoyle cum drenched snipper Ravn has been snipped.
Your support for Trump, & your unquestionable unqualified allegiance to authority
reveals your incipient fascism.
Michael Christ
2020-02-08 22:13:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by Michael Christ
The deceitful snaky gargoyle cum drenched snipper Ravn has been snipped.
Your support for Trump, & your unquestionable unqualified allegiance to authority
reveals your incipient fascism.
I don't support nor not support Trump, ye deceitful snaky gargoyle cum
drenched snipping empty claims wanker.

Thank you for reading.






Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Jack Shit
2020-02-06 22:04:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by Michael Christ
You need to get rid of her.
Trump is the problem. What you're on about here is just more of the same nonsense that always coming out of your ass.
He's a problem because he got acquitted?
Kevrob
2020-02-06 23:09:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by Michael Christ
You need to get rid of her.
Trump is the problem. What you're on about here is just more of the same nonsense that always coming out of your ass.
It is conceivable that both Trump and his crew, and Pelosi
and hers, are bad for the Republic, you know.

Plague on both their houses.

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Michael Christ
2020-02-07 04:06:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by ravn
Post by Michael Christ
You need to get rid of her.
Trump is the problem. What you're on about here is just more of the same nonsense that always coming out of your ass.
It is conceivable that both Trump and his crew, and Pelosi
and hers, are bad for the Republic, you know.
Plague on both their houses.
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
What?? Don't you like atheism??




Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Kevrob
2020-02-07 04:53:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by Kevrob
Post by ravn
Post by Michael Christ
You need to get rid of her.
Trump is the problem. What you're on about here is just more of the same nonsense that always coming out of your ass.
It is conceivable that both Trump and his crew, and Pelosi
and hers, are bad for the Republic, you know.
Plague on both their houses.
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
What?? Don't you like atheism??
Trump is a nominal Presbyterian, while Pelosi claims
to be Catholic. Could either or both be lying about
their Christianity, or fooling themselves? Sure, but
McLoon could be a giant Poe, after all.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-religious-dealmaking-dividends-232277

https://www.ncronline.org/news/opinion/ncrs-2019-newsmaker-year-nancy-pelosi

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Ivan The Terrible
2020-02-07 12:22:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.
"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
What she did was stupid and will accomplish nothing.
Michael Christ
2020-02-07 22:18:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ivan The Terrible
Post by Michael Christ
Pelosi, first she back-claps the office of the President of the United
States of America, then she rips up the speech of the President of the
United States of America.
Who voted her to be above that office??
Not only is she a disgrace to the office of the President of the United
States, she's a disgrace to the government of the United States of
America before the world.
You need to get rid of her. However, unless some miracle happens to the
contrary the die is cast now and the 'subliminal advertising' has
impacted the people as the leaders of your nation have set a new-low
norm of disrespect! Good luck with that!
But this is just another symptom of much more to come from a godless
world who has turned its back on the Lord and their only hope.
God is always the truth...
(KJV)
Jer 10:23  O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is
not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
(The Message)
Jer 10:23 I know, GOD, that mere mortals can't run their own lives,
That men and women don't have what it takes to take charge of life.
Michael Christ
PS You ignorant idiots who say nothing to see here folks or make some
stupid moron comment are merely sticking your heads up your asses and
saying, nothing to smell here folks.
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.
"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
What she did was stupid and will accomplish nothing.
Oh it was much more than stupid, Ivan. What she did was the epitome of
where this world is headed (always been headed) and a calculated
rebellious 'my will be done' act of defiance of any authority or
regulatory conscience.

And there it is on display, waving the flag of self-rights like a badge
of honour for all to see, the nation and the world, setting the 'way
forward standard' for all to follow.

In simple terms, where the rubber meets the road (me or you) it is fuck
God (the authority He put in place) and fuck my neighbour (the
irrelevance of the best interests of my neighbour, what I want takes
precedence).

Yes, the spirit of HaSatan and antichrist and they worship him! And
what is presented, a 78 year old woman dressed in top of the line
clothing in white.

2Co_11:14  And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel
of light.




Michael Christ

PS Is it a surprise that they call murdering a baby in a womb
'self-rights'??
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Loading...