Discussion:
Because God cares
(too old to reply)
Attila
2020-05-27 18:47:16 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 May 2020 16:02:24 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 5:43:49 PM UTC-7, "Sir Hømer Hall,
<...>
I've opted out of the heaven/hell track, ever since the EU
invented the Right To Be Forgotten. God hates that.
You can't opt out of the afterlife. Heaven or Hell, you get to
choose. Try to choose wisely.
Do you have anything other than threats to contribute?
In feeble minds Pascal's Wager never stales.
I was waiting for someone to come up with Pascal's Wager. Apparently
he doesn't know that it's been refuted to death. He just better hope
that he's chosen the right sky fairy to follow, or the
unchosen-but-actual one is liable to be really pissed at him.
Pascal's wager doesn't apply since those in the book of life are chosen
by God instead.
According to you but without supporting evidence.
What I said is a simple fact. It is the evidence.
Not as far as I am concerned.
Blind denial. You are required to verify the fact at the very least.
I am not required to do anything. You are the one trying to convince
me. Remember?
It's a two way street. If I provide the fact, you have to verify the
fact. That is your responsibility to ensure a meaningful debate.
You are wrong. It is always the responsibility of the person
providing the fact to also provide the supporting evidence.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.
I state as a fact Wolf 359 has a species of heat resistant green
snails living on it's surface. There is a fact for you. If I provide
the fact, you have to verify the fact. That is your responsibility to
ensure a meaningful debate.
Too bad, I'm not interested in your fact, and I have no argument against
your fact. Since you ask for the evidence, you are required to verify
the evidence.
Now provide evidence this is true.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.

Your simply saying something is a fact does not make it so.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
Attila
2020-05-27 18:48:59 UTC
Permalink
I'm here preaching the good news so that you may wake up to God who did
choose you before you were even born. Only a fool would reject God and
the love of God to condemn oneself to the hell of eternal regret and
self-condemnation.
You are assuming such a choice actually exists. Why is that?
There is no assumption. It's an actual realization.
It may be actual but it is an assumption as far as I am concerned. One
without supporting evidence.
That's still just your blind denial.
Why do you think any god was involved with my life at any point?
Because the nature of life is spiritual, and all spiritual things come
from the spiritual God.
So you say. How do I know it isn't a lie since you offer no
supporting evidence?
Supporting evidence please.
Life is the evidence. All you need is to understand life spiritually and
philosophically.
Psychobabble.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-28 00:28:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
I'm here preaching the good news so that you may wake up to God who did
choose you before you were even born. Only a fool would reject God and
the love of God to condemn oneself to the hell of eternal regret and
self-condemnation.
You are assuming such a choice actually exists. Why is that?
There is no assumption. It's an actual realization.
It may be actual but it is an assumption as far as I am concerned. One
without supporting evidence.
That's still just your blind denial.
Why do you think any god was involved with my life at any point?
Because the nature of life is spiritual, and all spiritual things come
from the spiritual God.
So you say. How do I know it isn't a lie since you offer no
supporting evidence?
That's why you should follow the teaching of Jesus to discover
everything for yourself.
Post by Attila
Supporting evidence please.
Life is the evidence. All you need is to understand life spiritually and
philosophically.
Psychobabble.
No, simple philosophy.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-05-28 01:07:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I'm here preaching the good news so that you may wake up to God who did
choose you before you were even born. Only a fool would reject God and
the love of God to condemn oneself to the hell of eternal regret and
self-condemnation.
You are assuming such a choice actually exists. Why is that?
There is no assumption. It's an actual realization.
It may be actual but it is an assumption as far as I am concerned. One
without supporting evidence.
That's still just your blind denial.
Why do you think any god was involved with my life at any point?
Because the nature of life is spiritual, and all spiritual things come
from the spiritual God.
So you say. How do I know it isn't a lie since you offer no
supporting evidence?
That's why you should follow the teaching of Jesus to discover
everything for yourself.
Why should I pay any attention to what someone claims someone else
said when there seems to be no supporting evidence for any of this?
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Supporting evidence please.
Life is the evidence. All you need is to understand life spiritually and
philosophically.
Psychobabble.
No, simple philosophy.
Psychobabble.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-28 21:01:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I'm here preaching the good news so that you may wake up to God who did
choose you before you were even born. Only a fool would reject God and
the love of God to condemn oneself to the hell of eternal regret and
self-condemnation.
You are assuming such a choice actually exists. Why is that?
There is no assumption. It's an actual realization.
It may be actual but it is an assumption as far as I am concerned. One
without supporting evidence.
That's still just your blind denial.
Why do you think any god was involved with my life at any point?
Because the nature of life is spiritual, and all spiritual things come
from the spiritual God.
So you say. How do I know it isn't a lie since you offer no
supporting evidence?
That's why you should follow the teaching of Jesus to discover
everything for yourself.
Why should I pay any attention to what someone claims someone else
said when there seems to be no supporting evidence for any of this?
Because the supporting evidence is only found in your own life when you
follow Jesus.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Supporting evidence please.
Life is the evidence. All you need is to understand life spiritually and
philosophically.
Psychobabble.
No, simple philosophy.
Psychobabble.
No, living truth.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-05-28 23:50:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I'm here preaching the good news so that you may wake up to God who did
choose you before you were even born. Only a fool would reject God and
the love of God to condemn oneself to the hell of eternal regret and
self-condemnation.
You are assuming such a choice actually exists. Why is that?
There is no assumption. It's an actual realization.
It may be actual but it is an assumption as far as I am concerned. One
without supporting evidence.
That's still just your blind denial.
Why do you think any god was involved with my life at any point?
Because the nature of life is spiritual, and all spiritual things come
from the spiritual God.
So you say. How do I know it isn't a lie since you offer no
supporting evidence?
That's why you should follow the teaching of Jesus to discover
everything for yourself.
Why should I pay any attention to what someone claims someone else
said when there seems to be no supporting evidence for any of this?
Because the supporting evidence is only found in your own life when you
follow Jesus.
Evasion. It has clearly been established that no one should pay any
attention to anything you say.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Supporting evidence please.
Life is the evidence. All you need is to understand life spiritually and
philosophically.
Psychobabble.
No, simple philosophy.
Psychobabble.
No, living truth.
Useless waste of space.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
Attila
2020-05-27 18:54:41 UTC
Permalink
Then Jesus didn't really go to heaven. He just rose up
into the earth.
Jesus rose up into the Earth's atmosphere first and after
that he rose up into Heaven.
Where is the evidence supporting that?
Where is the evidence supporting the existence of such a person?
It's all recorded in history books and in the best selling
book in the world - The Bible.
The bible is the claim, not the evidence, as CH said.
However, the truth of the Bible is the evidence.
You are assuming it contains truth. Why is that? How do you know it
isn't all lies?
It's not an assumption. It's assured conviction because it's the Word of
God.
That is the assumption. Where is your supporting evidence?
The evidence is found in following the Word of God in real life. What's
found in real life can never be an assumption.
That is not evidence. It is an assumption and is ambiguous.
Life is never an assumption. There is nothing ambiguous in life.
I am talking about evidence, not life.
Life is the evidence.
To you perhaps but not to anyone else. Does that tell you anything
other than everybody but you must be wrong?
No one can deny life.
Irrelevant. The existence of life does not automatically prove
anything about any god.
God is only found and realized in real life.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
god.
You are still wrong.
For something as profound as Jesus's alleged life, there
is surprisingly little independent mention. And before
you go there, Josephus is highly suspect.
There is more than one way to prove a person's existence. Einstein
doesn't need to be proven historically. His theory will forever be the
evidence of his existence.
Which theory would that be? There are several possibilities, some of
which have been proven wrong. Plus the obvious - the existence of a
theory is not proof of the existence of a particular person unless it
can be proven that person developed that theory.
What are you talking about? Are you going to deny that Einstein
developed his own theory?
He developed more than one theory and just because his name is on a
theory is not evidence that he developed that theory. Or ever
existed. Independent evidence is required.
Everybody knows what Einstein's theory is.
He had two - Special Relativity and General Relativity. He received
his Nobel Prize "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and
especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect."
Since they are all his theories, what's the difference? Did he steal one
of them from someone else?
No, but you talk as if there is only one thing.
I don't want to be specific. What's wrong with that?
Of course you don't. But you did talk about Einstein and "his theory"
when there is more than one theory and none of them earned the Nobel
Prize.
Why is that important? It has nothing to do with my point.
Yes it does. It shows your statement " Einstein doesn't need to be
proven historically. His theory will forever be the evidence of his
existence." is in error. He had at least two theories and his best
known accomplishment was not based on either of them.
One theory is enough. There is no need to be specific. So it doesn't matter.
If a theory exists that only supports it's existence. It had nothing
to do with who developed it or whether it is valid or not.
The theory is the evidence.
Not by itself it isn't.
Blind denial. A scientific theory is always the evidence of the scientist.
A scientist. Additional evidence is required to identify the
scientist involved.
If there is no scientist involved, there can't be a scientific theory in
the first place.
But which scientist? That is the question.
No. The question is about the existence of the scientist. It's not about
the name of the scientist.
" Einstein doesn't need to be proven historically. His theory will
forever be the evidence of his existence."
That's right.
That is what you said and that is what you need to support with
evidence.
Someone invented the wheel. Who?
The wheel is the evidence of its maker. Who is the maker is entirely
another question.
That was exactly the question. Who invented the wheel?
The question is about his existence. It's not about his name. If you
want argue about the name, you have already acknowledged the existence
of the person.
Actually historians think no one person invented the wheel but it
developed in several unrelated cultures.

Therefore the existence of the wheel does not automatically mean
someone invented it.

To simply say something was done and therefore someone must have done
it is about as meaningless a comment as it is possible to make.
In the exact same way, the spiritual and
philosophical teaching of Jesus is already the evidence of the
historical Jesus.
Nope. Not even close for many reasons. Vagueness and ambiguity being
the main culprits.
The only vagueness is due to your blind denial of the teaching of Jesus.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
such person ever existed.
Blind denial already. That may be a new record.
You can't beat your own record. It's still nothing but your blind denial.
It didn't take you long to reach that standard evasion.
I'm only pointing out the fact.
The only fact here is that you always end up in evasion.
That is still your blind denial of the fact.
More evasion.
More blind denial.
Still evading.
That's you. Stop evading now.
More evasion.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-28 00:25:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Then Jesus didn't really go to heaven. He just rose up
into the earth.
Jesus rose up into the Earth's atmosphere first and after
that he rose up into Heaven.
Where is the evidence supporting that?
Where is the evidence supporting the existence of such a person?
It's all recorded in history books and in the best selling
book in the world - The Bible.
The bible is the claim, not the evidence, as CH said.
However, the truth of the Bible is the evidence.
You are assuming it contains truth. Why is that? How do you know it
isn't all lies?
It's not an assumption. It's assured conviction because it's the Word of
God.
That is the assumption. Where is your supporting evidence?
The evidence is found in following the Word of God in real life. What's
found in real life can never be an assumption.
That is not evidence. It is an assumption and is ambiguous.
Life is never an assumption. There is nothing ambiguous in life.
I am talking about evidence, not life.
Life is the evidence.
To you perhaps but not to anyone else. Does that tell you anything
other than everybody but you must be wrong?
No one can deny life.
Irrelevant. The existence of life does not automatically prove
anything about any god.
God is only found and realized in real life.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
god.
That's because you are blind to God who is spiritual instead of physical.
Post by Attila
You are still wrong.
For something as profound as Jesus's alleged life, there
is surprisingly little independent mention. And before
you go there, Josephus is highly suspect.
There is more than one way to prove a person's existence. Einstein
doesn't need to be proven historically. His theory will forever be the
evidence of his existence.
Which theory would that be? There are several possibilities, some of
which have been proven wrong. Plus the obvious - the existence of a
theory is not proof of the existence of a particular person unless it
can be proven that person developed that theory.
What are you talking about? Are you going to deny that Einstein
developed his own theory?
He developed more than one theory and just because his name is on a
theory is not evidence that he developed that theory. Or ever
existed. Independent evidence is required.
Everybody knows what Einstein's theory is.
He had two - Special Relativity and General Relativity. He received
his Nobel Prize "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and
especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect."
Since they are all his theories, what's the difference? Did he steal one
of them from someone else?
No, but you talk as if there is only one thing.
I don't want to be specific. What's wrong with that?
Of course you don't. But you did talk about Einstein and "his theory"
when there is more than one theory and none of them earned the Nobel
Prize.
Why is that important? It has nothing to do with my point.
Yes it does. It shows your statement " Einstein doesn't need to be
proven historically. His theory will forever be the evidence of his
existence." is in error. He had at least two theories and his best
known accomplishment was not based on either of them.
One theory is enough. There is no need to be specific. So it doesn't matter.
If a theory exists that only supports it's existence. It had nothing
to do with who developed it or whether it is valid or not.
The theory can't appear by magic. It has to be developed by the scientist.
Post by Attila
The theory is the evidence.
Not by itself it isn't.
Blind denial. A scientific theory is always the evidence of the scientist.
A scientist. Additional evidence is required to identify the
scientist involved.
If there is no scientist involved, there can't be a scientific theory in
the first place.
But which scientist? That is the question.
No. The question is about the existence of the scientist. It's not about
the name of the scientist.
" Einstein doesn't need to be proven historically. His theory will
forever be the evidence of his existence."
That's right.
That is what you said and that is what you need to support with
evidence.
It's just simple logic. If you can refute the logic, you have to accept
the conclusion.
Post by Attila
Someone invented the wheel. Who?
The wheel is the evidence of its maker. Who is the maker is entirely
another question.
That was exactly the question. Who invented the wheel?
The question is about his existence. It's not about his name. If you
want argue about the name, you have already acknowledged the existence
of the person.
Actually historians think no one person invented the wheel but it
developed in several unrelated cultures.
Pure speculation. In ancient time, it is not possible to pass the same
story across different cultures, regions, and times. If it's indeed the
same story, it can only be the work of God.
Post by Attila
Therefore the existence of the wheel does not automatically mean
someone invented it.
False. The invention requires the inventor.
Post by Attila
To simply say something was done and therefore someone must have done
it is about as meaningless a comment as it is possible to make
The philosophy of Jesus is not an ordinary thing. It's based on the real
life of Jesus. It can't be created by anyone else.
Post by Attila
In the exact same way, the spiritual and
philosophical teaching of Jesus is already the evidence of the
historical Jesus.
Nope. Not even close for many reasons. Vagueness and ambiguity being
the main culprits.
The only vagueness is due to your blind denial of the teaching of Jesus.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
such person ever existed.
Blind denial already. That may be a new record.
You can't beat your own record. It's still nothing but your blind denial.
It didn't take you long to reach that standard evasion.
I'm only pointing out the fact.
The only fact here is that you always end up in evasion.
That is still your blind denial of the fact.
More evasion.
More blind denial.
Still evading.
That's you. Stop evading now.
More evasion.
That's you. Stop evading now.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-05-28 01:20:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Then Jesus didn't really go to heaven. He just rose up
into the earth.
Jesus rose up into the Earth's atmosphere first and after
that he rose up into Heaven.
Where is the evidence supporting that?
Where is the evidence supporting the existence of such a person?
It's all recorded in history books and in the best selling
book in the world - The Bible.
The bible is the claim, not the evidence, as CH said.
However, the truth of the Bible is the evidence.
You are assuming it contains truth. Why is that? How do you know it
isn't all lies?
It's not an assumption. It's assured conviction because it's the Word of
God.
That is the assumption. Where is your supporting evidence?
The evidence is found in following the Word of God in real life. What's
found in real life can never be an assumption.
That is not evidence. It is an assumption and is ambiguous.
Life is never an assumption. There is nothing ambiguous in life.
I am talking about evidence, not life.
Life is the evidence.
To you perhaps but not to anyone else. Does that tell you anything
other than everybody but you must be wrong?
No one can deny life.
Irrelevant. The existence of life does not automatically prove
anything about any god.
God is only found and realized in real life.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
god.
That's because you are blind to God who is spiritual instead of physical.
I have yet to see any evidence that supports anything spiritual being
real. Therefore I consider the subject imaginary.

That statement will not change - I have posted it for you at least a
dozen times.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
You are still wrong.
For something as profound as Jesus's alleged life, there
is surprisingly little independent mention. And before
you go there, Josephus is highly suspect.
There is more than one way to prove a person's existence. Einstein
doesn't need to be proven historically. His theory will forever be the
evidence of his existence.
Which theory would that be? There are several possibilities, some of
which have been proven wrong. Plus the obvious - the existence of a
theory is not proof of the existence of a particular person unless it
can be proven that person developed that theory.
What are you talking about? Are you going to deny that Einstein
developed his own theory?
He developed more than one theory and just because his name is on a
theory is not evidence that he developed that theory. Or ever
existed. Independent evidence is required.
Everybody knows what Einstein's theory is.
He had two - Special Relativity and General Relativity. He received
his Nobel Prize "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and
especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect."
Since they are all his theories, what's the difference? Did he steal one
of them from someone else?
No, but you talk as if there is only one thing.
I don't want to be specific. What's wrong with that?
Of course you don't. But you did talk about Einstein and "his theory"
when there is more than one theory and none of them earned the Nobel
Prize.
Why is that important? It has nothing to do with my point.
Yes it does. It shows your statement " Einstein doesn't need to be
proven historically. His theory will forever be the evidence of his
existence." is in error. He had at least two theories and his best
known accomplishment was not based on either of them.
One theory is enough. There is no need to be specific. So it doesn't matter.
If a theory exists that only supports it's existence. It had nothing
to do with who developed it or whether it is valid or not.
The theory can't appear by magic. It has to be developed by the scientist.
It probably was developed by someone but it does nothing to support
the existence of any particular someone without supporting evidence.

Anyone could have developed the theory.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
The theory is the evidence.
Not by itself it isn't.
Blind denial. A scientific theory is always the evidence of the scientist.
A scientist. Additional evidence is required to identify the
scientist involved.
If there is no scientist involved, there can't be a scientific theory in
the first place.
But which scientist? That is the question.
No. The question is about the existence of the scientist. It's not about
the name of the scientist.
" Einstein doesn't need to be proven historically. His theory will
forever be the evidence of his existence."
That's right.
That is what you said and that is what you need to support with
evidence.
It's just simple logic. If you can refute the logic, you have to accept
the conclusion.
I don't "have to accept" anything. Your so-called logic is
irrelevant.

Supporting evidence is required.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Someone invented the wheel. Who?
The wheel is the evidence of its maker. Who is the maker is entirely
another question.
That was exactly the question. Who invented the wheel?
The question is about his existence. It's not about his name. If you
want argue about the name, you have already acknowledged the existence
of the person.
Actually historians think no one person invented the wheel but it
developed in several unrelated cultures.
Pure speculation. In ancient time, it is not possible to pass the same
story across different cultures, regions, and times.
It isn't a story. It is the development of a tool. You may as well
say one person invented the hammer, the spear, or developed fire.
These were occurrences that happened to multiple isolated societies.
Post by aaa
If it's indeed the
same story, it can only be the work of God.
That is about as meaningful as ""Oh, look! A pile of poop! That
proves there is a god!"
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Therefore the existence of the wheel does not automatically mean
someone invented it.
False. The invention requires the inventor.
Oh? Does that also go for the spear, the hammer, the bow, the wheel
and fire? All of which were developed by isolated groups that had no
possibility of ever coming into contact.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
To simply say something was done and therefore someone must have done
it is about as meaningless a comment as it is possible to make
The philosophy of Jesus is not an ordinary thing.
I have no idea what it is but I am sure someone else could have
written it.
Post by aaa
It's based on the real
life of Jesus.
How do I know you are not lying?
Post by aaa
It can't be created by anyone else.
See above.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
In the exact same way, the spiritual and
philosophical teaching of Jesus is already the evidence of the
historical Jesus.
Nope. Not even close for many reasons. Vagueness and ambiguity being
the main culprits.
The only vagueness is due to your blind denial of the teaching of Jesus.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
such person ever existed.
Blind denial already. That may be a new record.
You can't beat your own record. It's still nothing but your blind denial.
It didn't take you long to reach that standard evasion.
I'm only pointing out the fact.
The only fact here is that you always end up in evasion.
That is still your blind denial of the fact.
More evasion.
More blind denial.
Still evading.
That's you. Stop evading now.
More evasion.
That's you. Stop evading now.
You are still evading the issue.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-28 18:22:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Then Jesus didn't really go to heaven. He just rose up
into the earth.
Jesus rose up into the Earth's atmosphere first and after
that he rose up into Heaven.
Where is the evidence supporting that?
Where is the evidence supporting the existence of such a person?
It's all recorded in history books and in the best selling
book in the world - The Bible.
The bible is the claim, not the evidence, as CH said.
However, the truth of the Bible is the evidence.
You are assuming it contains truth. Why is that? How do you know it
isn't all lies?
It's not an assumption. It's assured conviction because it's the Word of
God.
That is the assumption. Where is your supporting evidence?
The evidence is found in following the Word of God in real life. What's
found in real life can never be an assumption.
That is not evidence. It is an assumption and is ambiguous.
Life is never an assumption. There is nothing ambiguous in life.
I am talking about evidence, not life.
Life is the evidence.
To you perhaps but not to anyone else. Does that tell you anything
other than everybody but you must be wrong?
No one can deny life.
Irrelevant. The existence of life does not automatically prove
anything about any god.
God is only found and realized in real life.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
god.
That's because you are blind to God who is spiritual instead of physical.
I have yet to see any evidence that supports anything spiritual being
real. Therefore I consider the subject imaginary.
If you acknowledge the author of the scientific theory, you have to
acknowledge the author of the philosophical teaching written in the
Gospels. It's simple logic.
Post by Attila
That statement will not change - I have posted it for you at least a
dozen times.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
You are still wrong.
For something as profound as Jesus's alleged life, there
is surprisingly little independent mention. And before
you go there, Josephus is highly suspect.
There is more than one way to prove a person's existence. Einstein
doesn't need to be proven historically. His theory will forever be the
evidence of his existence.
Which theory would that be? There are several possibilities, some of
which have been proven wrong. Plus the obvious - the existence of a
theory is not proof of the existence of a particular person unless it
can be proven that person developed that theory.
What are you talking about? Are you going to deny that Einstein
developed his own theory?
He developed more than one theory and just because his name is on a
theory is not evidence that he developed that theory. Or ever
existed. Independent evidence is required.
Everybody knows what Einstein's theory is.
He had two - Special Relativity and General Relativity. He received
his Nobel Prize "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and
especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect."
Since they are all his theories, what's the difference? Did he steal one
of them from someone else?
No, but you talk as if there is only one thing.
I don't want to be specific. What's wrong with that?
Of course you don't. But you did talk about Einstein and "his theory"
when there is more than one theory and none of them earned the Nobel
Prize.
Why is that important? It has nothing to do with my point.
Yes it does. It shows your statement " Einstein doesn't need to be
proven historically. His theory will forever be the evidence of his
existence." is in error. He had at least two theories and his best
known accomplishment was not based on either of them.
One theory is enough. There is no need to be specific. So it doesn't matter.
If a theory exists that only supports it's existence. It had nothing
to do with who developed it or whether it is valid or not.
The theory can't appear by magic. It has to be developed by the scientist.
It probably was developed by someone but it does nothing to support
the existence of any particular someone without supporting evidence.
Anyone could have developed the theory.
According to the philosophical teaching itself, its author is named
Jesus. If you can't deny the teaching, you have to acknowledge the author.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
The theory is the evidence.
Not by itself it isn't.
Blind denial. A scientific theory is always the evidence of the scientist.
A scientist. Additional evidence is required to identify the
scientist involved.
If there is no scientist involved, there can't be a scientific theory in
the first place.
But which scientist? That is the question.
No. The question is about the existence of the scientist. It's not about
the name of the scientist.
" Einstein doesn't need to be proven historically. His theory will
forever be the evidence of his existence."
That's right.
That is what you said and that is what you need to support with
evidence.
It's just simple logic. If you can [not] refute the logic, you have to accept
the conclusion.
I don't "have to accept" anything. Your so-called logic is
irrelevant.
Blind denial.
Post by Attila
Supporting evidence is required.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Someone invented the wheel. Who?
The wheel is the evidence of its maker. Who is the maker is entirely
another question.
That was exactly the question. Who invented the wheel?
The question is about his existence. It's not about his name. If you
want argue about the name, you have already acknowledged the existence
of the person.
Actually historians think no one person invented the wheel but it
developed in several unrelated cultures.
Pure speculation. In ancient time, it is not possible to pass the same
story across different cultures, regions, and times.
It isn't a story. It is the development of a tool. You may as well
say one person invented the hammer, the spear, or developed fire.
These were occurrences that happened to multiple isolated societies.
The philosophy of Jesus is based on the life of Jesus. The life of Jesus
has been recorded in the Gospels as the story of Jesus.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
If it's indeed the
same story, it can only be the work of God.
That is about as meaningful as ""Oh, look! A pile of poop! That
proves there is a god!"
That's just your blind denial again.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Therefore the existence of the wheel does not automatically mean
someone invented it.
False. The invention requires the inventor.
Oh? Does that also go for the spear, the hammer, the bow, the wheel
and fire? All of which were developed by isolated groups that had no
possibility of ever coming into contact.
If it's an invention, there must be an inventor. That's just simple
common sense.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
To simply say something was done and therefore someone must have done
it is about as meaningless a comment as it is possible to make
The philosophy of Jesus is not an ordinary thing.
I have no idea what it is but I am sure someone else could have
written it.
Post by aaa
It's based on the real
life of Jesus.
How do I know you are not lying?
Because it has been testified by countless Christians throughout history
with their own lives. Their testimony is the evidence that the
philosophy of Jesus is based on real life experience. It can't be made
up by the Gospel writers.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It can't be created by anyone else.
See above.
See above.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
In the exact same way, the spiritual and
philosophical teaching of Jesus is already the evidence of the
historical Jesus.
Nope. Not even close for many reasons. Vagueness and ambiguity being
the main culprits.
The only vagueness is due to your blind denial of the teaching of Jesus.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
such person ever existed.
Blind denial already. That may be a new record.
You can't beat your own record. It's still nothing but your blind denial.
It didn't take you long to reach that standard evasion.
I'm only pointing out the fact.
The only fact here is that you always end up in evasion.
That is still your blind denial of the fact.
More evasion.
More blind denial.
Still evading.
That's you. Stop evading now.
More evasion.
That's you. Stop evading now.
You are still evading the issue.
That's you. Stop evading now.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Cloud Hobbit
2020-05-28 23:37:30 UTC
Permalink
If you acknowledge the author of the scientific >theory, you have to
acknowledge the author of the >philosophical teaching written in the
Gospels.
The philosophy of the bible has been studied and that's why it is rejected. Its a philosophy of death. All the rewards come after you die.
The big ones anyway.

Nobody knows for sure who wrote the gospels as they were written after Jesus' death.

The OT is just a collection of folk tales that have no bearing on reality.

A FACT is a fact because it has SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.

If something is a fact that nobody has ever heard before, you need to supply the supporting evidence. Otherwise, its just something somebody said. You can't convince anyone of a fact without supporting evidence.

You have none.
Attila
2020-05-27 18:55:05 UTC
Permalink
<...>
So heaven is up in the sky somewhere, possibly above the
firmament? Or in a different galaxy?
Probably in a different dimension. That makes the most sense.
When God said, "Let there be light" and released the Big
Bang, he obviously did so from a different dimension because
the dimension created by the Big Bang did not exist at creation
time.
==
Now you're saying God can't exist outside a dimension?
This is just getting better.
How many dimensions does a supreme being occupy?
Well superstring theory requires ten dimensions.
It's just that the extra ones are rolled up really really really really really
really really really tiny, which is why we don't detect them.
If that's where God is hiding, He's a really really really really really tiny God indeed.
Like Planck length tiny.
Oko
The string theory only predicts the parallel dimension. God's dimension
is the higher dimension. They are not the same thing. The higher
dimension has total control and access to the lower dimension. It's just
like the eagle(a three dimensional animal) has total control over the
snake(a two dimensional animal).
Why do you say a snake is two dimensional? Are you aware a snake can
strike upwards? Are you aware some snakes live in trees? Are you
aware some snakes can fly?
When comparing with the Eagle, it's quite two dimensional.
No, it isn't.
Blind denial.
Standard evasion.
Modern
warfare is largely determined by air superiority because it has the
higher dimensional advantage.
Actually air superiority never won a war. It takes boots on the
ground to actually finish the job. We had air superiority in Nam and
we still got our butts kicked.
You can't deny the advantage of air superiority. It doesn't have to win
the war, but it does win every battle.
Since God controls the ultimate higher
dimensional advantage, the victory of God over the entire universe is
always a certainty.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
god.
That's because you are blind to God.
Standard evasion.
Just pointing out the fact.
That you always en up in an evasion? We all knew that.
That is still your blind denial.
And so the evasions begin.
More blind denial.
Still evading.
That's you. Stop evading now.
More evasion.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-28 00:07:06 UTC
Permalink
<...>
So heaven is up in the sky somewhere, possibly above the
firmament? Or in a different galaxy?
Probably in a different dimension. That makes the most sense.
When God said, "Let there be light" and released the Big
Bang, he obviously did so from a different dimension because
the dimension created by the Big Bang did not exist at creation
time.
==
Now you're saying God can't exist outside a dimension?
This is just getting better.
How many dimensions does a supreme being occupy?
Well superstring theory requires ten dimensions.
It's just that the extra ones are rolled up really really really really really
really really really tiny, which is why we don't detect them.
If that's where God is hiding, He's a really really really really really tiny God indeed.
Like Planck length tiny.
Oko
The string theory only predicts the parallel dimension. God's dimension
is the higher dimension. They are not the same thing. The higher
dimension has total control and access to the lower dimension. It's just
like the eagle(a three dimensional animal) has total control over the
snake(a two dimensional animal).
Why do you say a snake is two dimensional? Are you aware a snake can
strike upwards? Are you aware some snakes live in trees? Are you
aware some snakes can fly?
When comparing with the Eagle, it's quite two dimensional.
No, it isn't.
Blind denial.
Standard evasion.
Modern
warfare is largely determined by air superiority because it has the
higher dimensional advantage.
Actually air superiority never won a war. It takes boots on the
ground to actually finish the job. We had air superiority in Nam and
we still got our butts kicked.
You can't deny the advantage of air superiority. It doesn't have to win
the war, but it does win every battle.
Since God controls the ultimate higher
dimensional advantage, the victory of God over the entire universe is
always a certainty.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
god.
That's because you are blind to God.
Standard evasion.
Just pointing out the fact.
That you always en up in an evasion? We all knew that.
That is still your blind denial.
And so the evasions begin.
More blind denial.
Still evading.
That's you. Stop evading now.
More evasion.
That's you. Stop evading now.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-05-28 01:23:21 UTC
Permalink
<...>
So heaven is up in the sky somewhere, possibly above the
firmament? Or in a different galaxy?
Probably in a different dimension. That makes the most sense.
When God said, "Let there be light" and released the Big
Bang, he obviously did so from a different dimension because
the dimension created by the Big Bang did not exist at creation
time.
==
Now you're saying God can't exist outside a dimension?
This is just getting better.
How many dimensions does a supreme being occupy?
Well superstring theory requires ten dimensions.
It's just that the extra ones are rolled up really really really really really
really really really tiny, which is why we don't detect them.
If that's where God is hiding, He's a really really really really really tiny God indeed.
Like Planck length tiny.
Oko
The string theory only predicts the parallel dimension. God's dimension
is the higher dimension. They are not the same thing. The higher
dimension has total control and access to the lower dimension. It's just
like the eagle(a three dimensional animal) has total control over the
snake(a two dimensional animal).
Why do you say a snake is two dimensional? Are you aware a snake can
strike upwards? Are you aware some snakes live in trees? Are you
aware some snakes can fly?
When comparing with the Eagle, it's quite two dimensional.
No, it isn't.
Blind denial.
Standard evasion.
Modern
warfare is largely determined by air superiority because it has the
higher dimensional advantage.
Actually air superiority never won a war. It takes boots on the
ground to actually finish the job. We had air superiority in Nam and
we still got our butts kicked.
You can't deny the advantage of air superiority. It doesn't have to win
the war, but it does win every battle.
Since God controls the ultimate higher
dimensional advantage, the victory of God over the entire universe is
always a certainty.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
god.
That's because you are blind to God.
Standard evasion.
Just pointing out the fact.
That you always en up in an evasion? We all knew that.
That is still your blind denial.
And so the evasions begin.
More blind denial.
Still evading.
That's you. Stop evading now.
More evasion.
That's you. Stop evading now.
You are still evading the issue.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-28 18:23:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
<...>
So heaven is up in the sky somewhere, possibly above the
firmament? Or in a different galaxy?
Probably in a different dimension. That makes the most sense.
When God said, "Let there be light" and released the Big
Bang, he obviously did so from a different dimension because
the dimension created by the Big Bang did not exist at creation
time.
==
Now you're saying God can't exist outside a dimension?
This is just getting better.
How many dimensions does a supreme being occupy?
Well superstring theory requires ten dimensions.
It's just that the extra ones are rolled up really really really really really
really really really tiny, which is why we don't detect them.
If that's where God is hiding, He's a really really really really really tiny God indeed.
Like Planck length tiny.
Oko
The string theory only predicts the parallel dimension. God's dimension
is the higher dimension. They are not the same thing. The higher
dimension has total control and access to the lower dimension. It's just
like the eagle(a three dimensional animal) has total control over the
snake(a two dimensional animal).
Why do you say a snake is two dimensional? Are you aware a snake can
strike upwards? Are you aware some snakes live in trees? Are you
aware some snakes can fly?
When comparing with the Eagle, it's quite two dimensional.
No, it isn't.
Blind denial.
Standard evasion.
Modern
warfare is largely determined by air superiority because it has the
higher dimensional advantage.
Actually air superiority never won a war. It takes boots on the
ground to actually finish the job. We had air superiority in Nam and
we still got our butts kicked.
You can't deny the advantage of air superiority. It doesn't have to win
the war, but it does win every battle.
Since God controls the ultimate higher
dimensional advantage, the victory of God over the entire universe is
always a certainty.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
god.
That's because you are blind to God.
Standard evasion.
Just pointing out the fact.
That you always en up in an evasion? We all knew that.
That is still your blind denial.
And so the evasions begin.
More blind denial.
Still evading.
That's you. Stop evading now.
More evasion.
That's you. Stop evading now.
You are still evading the issue.
That's you. Stop evading now.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-05-27 18:55:56 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 23 May 2020 10:20:20 -0400, "Sir Hømer Hall,  Esq."
Then Jesus didn't really go to heaven.  He just rose up
into the earth.
Jesus rose up into the Earth's atmosphere first and after
that he rose up into Heaven.
This also proves that Hell isn't down in the center of the
Earth somewhere. Because those who go to Hell also
first rise up into Earths atmosphere and then to the
place where they will be judged which is somewhere
above the Earth's atmosphere but not in Heaven.
The Beam Seat is neither on Earth or in Earth's
atmosphere. It's in a place somewhere below Heaven
and between Heaven and Hell.
But Jesus referenced the good wheat being stored and the wheat
hulls being
burned.
Too bad there is no valid evidence any such person ever lived or ever
said anything.
The philosophy of Jesus is the evidence. If you can't prove the
philosophy wrong, you can't deny the existence of Jesus.
No one needs to prove anything wrong.  If you say something is correct
it is up to you to prove it.
The teaching of Jesus speaks for itself.
I can deny the existence of anyone and anything that does not have
independent supporting evidence.
The teaching of Jesus is the independent supporting evidence.
Stupid, isn't he?
That's spook attila for you.
Says the admitted liar.
the dukester, American-American
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-27 19:09:01 UTC
Permalink
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 3:36:34 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote: <Snippage>
The teaching of Jesus is a philosophy proven in real life by real
people. It's real knowledge. As real knowledge, it can only come
from the real person whose name is Jesus. It is the timeless
evidence of Jesus.
I hate to tell you, but that's called "circular reasoning," and it's
a logical fallacy. If you want to sell your philosophy in this
newsgroup, you're gonna have to try harder.
There is nothing circular. The teaching of Jesus is the evidence of
Jesus just as the theory of Einstein is the evidence of Einstein. It's
perfect logic.

Since you can't deny the theory of Einstein, you must give Einstein the
Nobel Price.
Since you can't deny the teaching of Jesus, you must accept Jesus as
your Lord.
Brenda Nelson, A.A. #34 BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Oko tillo
2020-05-28 00:40:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 3:36:34 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote: <Snippage>
The teaching of Jesus is a philosophy proven in real life by real
people. It's real knowledge. As real knowledge, it can only come
from the real person whose name is Jesus. It is the timeless
evidence of Jesus.
==
Post by aaa
I hate to tell you, but that's called "circular reasoning," and it's
a logical fallacy. If you want to sell your philosophy in this
newsgroup, you're gonna have to try harder.
There is nothing circular. The teaching of Jesus is the evidence of
Jesus just as the theory of Einstein is the evidence of Einstein. It's
perfect logic.
Since you can't deny the theory of Einstein, you must give Einstein the
Nobel Price.
Amusing side note, Brenda: aaa has informed us that he himself
deserves a "Nobel Price":

-- https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/A7TmlIdSXxE/NaKmQ2rKAgAJ
Post by aaa
Since you can't deny the teaching of Jesus
She can't?

Looks like you've missed a few hundred of her posts.


Oko
Post by aaa
, you must accept Jesus as
your Lord.
aaa
2020-05-28 22:40:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Oko tillo
Post by aaa
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 3:36:34 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote: <Snippage>
The teaching of Jesus is a philosophy proven in real life by real
people. It's real knowledge. As real knowledge, it can only come
from the real person whose name is Jesus. It is the timeless
evidence of Jesus.
==
Post by aaa
I hate to tell you, but that's called "circular reasoning," and it's
a logical fallacy. If you want to sell your philosophy in this
newsgroup, you're gonna have to try harder.
There is nothing circular. The teaching of Jesus is the evidence of
Jesus just as the theory of Einstein is the evidence of Einstein. It's
perfect logic.
Since you can't deny the theory of Einstein, you must give Einstein the
Nobel Price.
Amusing side note, Brenda: aaa has informed us that he himself
That's old news. I'm not so sure I want to accept any Nobel Prize now. I
can't allow my good name appear next to the names of human beasts who
are war criminals and man eaters.
Post by Oko tillo
-- https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/A7TmlIdSXxE/NaKmQ2rKAgAJ
Post by aaa
Since you can't deny the teaching of Jesus
She can't?
No one can.
Post by Oko tillo
Looks like you've missed a few hundred of her posts.
I have never seen anyone who dares to attack the philosophy of Jesus.
Post by Oko tillo
Oko
Post by aaa
, you must accept Jesus as
your Lord.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-05-28 01:31:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 3:36:34 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote: <Snippage>
The teaching of Jesus is a philosophy proven in real life by real
people. It's real knowledge. As real knowledge, it can only come
from the real person whose name is Jesus. It is the timeless
evidence of Jesus.
I hate to tell you, but that's called "circular reasoning," and it's
a logical fallacy. If you want to sell your philosophy in this
newsgroup, you're gonna have to try harder.
There is nothing circular. The teaching of Jesus is the evidence of
Jesus just as the theory of Einstein is the evidence of Einstein. It's
perfect logic.
Since you can't deny the theory of Einstein, you must give Einstein the
Nobel Price.
Amusing. It was a prize, not a price, and he did not get it for any
theory. He received it before he postulated his first theory.

"In 1921, he won the Nobel Prize for physics for his explanation of
the photoelectric effect."

https://www.biography.com/scientist/albert-einstein
Post by aaa
Since you can't deny the teaching of Jesus, you must accept Jesus as
your Lord.
Brenda Nelson, A.A. #34 BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-28 20:56:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 3:36:34 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote: <Snippage>
The teaching of Jesus is a philosophy proven in real life by real
people. It's real knowledge. As real knowledge, it can only come
from the real person whose name is Jesus. It is the timeless
evidence of Jesus.
I hate to tell you, but that's called "circular reasoning," and it's
a logical fallacy. If you want to sell your philosophy in this
newsgroup, you're gonna have to try harder.
There is nothing circular. The teaching of Jesus is the evidence of
Jesus just as the theory of Einstein is the evidence of Einstein. It's
perfect logic.
Since you can't deny the theory of Einstein, you must give Einstein the
Nobel Price.
Amusing. It was a prize, not a price,
Sorry, I wasn't paying enough attention.

and he did not get it for any
Post by Attila
theory. He received it before he postulated his first theory.
You are only arguing the details to create a distraction, but I'm sure
you fully understand my actual point.
Post by Attila
"In 1921, he won the Nobel Prize for physics for his explanation of
the photoelectric effect."
https://www.biography.com/scientist/albert-einstein
Post by aaa
Since you can't deny the teaching of Jesus, you must accept Jesus as
your Lord.
Brenda Nelson, A.A. #34 BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
aaa
2020-05-27 21:37:16 UTC
Permalink
Then Jesus didn't really go to heaven. He just rose up
into the earth.
Jesus rose up into the Earth's atmosphere first and after
that he rose up into Heaven.
This also proves that Hell isn't down in the center of the
Earth somewhere. Because those who go to Hell also
first rise up into Earths atmosphere and then to the
place where they will be judged which is somewhere
above the Earth's atmosphere but not in Heaven.
The Beam Seat is neither on Earth or in Earth's
atmosphere. It's in a place somewhere below Heaven
and between Heaven and Hell.
But Jesus referenced the good wheat being stored and the wheat hulls being
burned.
Too bad there is no valid evidence any such person ever lived or ever
said anything.
The philosophy of Jesus is the evidence. If you can't prove the
philosophy wrong, you can't deny the existence of Jesus.
No one needs to prove anything wrong. If you say something is correct
it is up to you to prove it.
The teaching of Jesus speaks for itself.
I question whether such a person ever existed and whether or not his
so-called "teachings" are simply self serving myth and lies.
The teaching of Jesus is a philosophy proven in real life by real
people. It's real knowledge. As real knowledge, it can only come from
the real person whose name is Jesus. It is the timeless evidence of Jesus.
Wrong. Where is specific evidence that anyone as described in your
bible ever existed?
I have just shown you the timeless evidence of Jesus written in the Bible.
I can deny the existence of anyone and anything that does not have
independent supporting evidence.
The teaching of Jesus is the independent supporting evidence.
It is evidence of nothing.
That's just your ignorance speaking.
You refuse to accept facts.
The only fact you have is called ignorance. Yes, I refuse to accept your
ignorance.
the dukester, American-American
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-05-28 01:27:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Then Jesus didn't really go to heaven. He just rose up
into the earth.
Jesus rose up into the Earth's atmosphere first and after
that he rose up into Heaven.
This also proves that Hell isn't down in the center of the
Earth somewhere. Because those who go to Hell also
first rise up into Earths atmosphere and then to the
place where they will be judged which is somewhere
above the Earth's atmosphere but not in Heaven.
The Beam Seat is neither on Earth or in Earth's
atmosphere. It's in a place somewhere below Heaven
and between Heaven and Hell.
But Jesus referenced the good wheat being stored and the wheat hulls being
burned.
Too bad there is no valid evidence any such person ever lived or ever
said anything.
The philosophy of Jesus is the evidence. If you can't prove the
philosophy wrong, you can't deny the existence of Jesus.
No one needs to prove anything wrong. If you say something is correct
it is up to you to prove it.
The teaching of Jesus speaks for itself.
I question whether such a person ever existed and whether or not his
so-called "teachings" are simply self serving myth and lies.
The teaching of Jesus is a philosophy proven in real life by real
people. It's real knowledge. As real knowledge, it can only come from
the real person whose name is Jesus. It is the timeless evidence of Jesus.
Wrong. Where is specific evidence that anyone as described in your
bible ever existed?
I have just shown you the timeless evidence of Jesus written in the Bible.
Nothing in that source can be used since it is unverified. How do I
know it is not all lies?
Post by aaa
I can deny the existence of anyone and anything that does not have
independent supporting evidence.
The teaching of Jesus is the independent supporting evidence.
It is evidence of nothing.
That's just your ignorance speaking.
You refuse to accept facts.
The only fact you have is called ignorance. Yes, I refuse to accept your
ignorance.
I have stated facts. The ignorance ( if it exists) of someone else is
not yours to either accept or reject.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-28 20:30:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Then Jesus didn't really go to heaven. He just rose up
into the earth.
Jesus rose up into the Earth's atmosphere first and after
that he rose up into Heaven.
This also proves that Hell isn't down in the center of the
Earth somewhere. Because those who go to Hell also
first rise up into Earths atmosphere and then to the
place where they will be judged which is somewhere
above the Earth's atmosphere but not in Heaven.
The Beam Seat is neither on Earth or in Earth's
atmosphere. It's in a place somewhere below Heaven
and between Heaven and Hell.
But Jesus referenced the good wheat being stored and the wheat hulls being
burned.
Too bad there is no valid evidence any such person ever lived or ever
said anything.
The philosophy of Jesus is the evidence. If you can't prove the
philosophy wrong, you can't deny the existence of Jesus.
No one needs to prove anything wrong. If you say something is correct
it is up to you to prove it.
The teaching of Jesus speaks for itself.
I question whether such a person ever existed and whether or not his
so-called "teachings" are simply self serving myth and lies.
The teaching of Jesus is a philosophy proven in real life by real
people. It's real knowledge. As real knowledge, it can only come from
the real person whose name is Jesus. It is the timeless evidence of Jesus.
Wrong. Where is specific evidence that anyone as described in your
bible ever existed?
I have just shown you the timeless evidence of Jesus written in the Bible.
Nothing in that source can be used since it is unverified. How do I
know it is not all lies?
You can verify the teaching of Jesus all by yourself.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
I can deny the existence of anyone and anything that does not have
independent supporting evidence.
The teaching of Jesus is the independent supporting evidence.
It is evidence of nothing.
That's just your ignorance speaking.
You refuse to accept facts.
The only fact you have is called ignorance. Yes, I refuse to accept your
ignorance.
I have stated facts. The ignorance ( if it exists) of someone else is
not yours to either accept or reject.
That is not for you to decide. You need to face your own ignorance for
your own benefit.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Peter Pan
2020-05-28 00:31:56 UTC
Permalink
1) Christians believe and we need no further proof
other than the Bible which is a history book and
the most read book in the world,
2) We know that free choice is proof of God. The
very laws of physics prove there IS no free
choice in the structure of the universe so
creatures having free choice is actually against
the laws of physics and necessarily has to be
the purview of God,
3) We believe that if one chooses to be an atheist
there is a price to pay. God tells us to at least try
to lead you to the light but God also tells us that
in many cases we will not succeed so give up
and try to enlighten someone else who might be
more amenable and saveable/salvageable
It's just wonderful and ducky that you believe all that.
Why do you expect anyone to believe you? Is it just your
honest face?
<snip delusional crowing>
Mine is a logic-based approach.
LOL. Everything you said above is about belief.
Your belief.
Your faith-based belief.

It's all religion, not logic.

Gerggle, you think like a girl. Your emotions pwn you.

Stop doing that eye-fluttering thing. I'm not buying it.
aaa
2020-05-28 00:32:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
On Sat, 23 May 2020 16:02:24 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 5:43:49 PM UTC-7, "Sir Hømer Hall,
<...>
I've opted out of the heaven/hell track, ever since the EU
invented the Right To Be Forgotten. God hates that.
You can't opt out of the afterlife. Heaven or Hell, you get to
choose. Try to choose wisely.
Do you have anything other than threats to contribute?
In feeble minds Pascal's Wager never stales.
I was waiting for someone to come up with Pascal's Wager. Apparently
he doesn't know that it's been refuted to death. He just better hope
that he's chosen the right sky fairy to follow, or the
unchosen-but-actual one is liable to be really pissed at him.
Pascal's wager doesn't apply since those in the book of life are chosen
by God instead.
According to you but without supporting evidence.
What I said is a simple fact. It is the evidence.
Not as far as I am concerned.
Blind denial. You are required to verify the fact at the very least.
I am not required to do anything. You are the one trying to convince
me. Remember?
It's a two way street. If I provide the fact, you have to verify the
fact. That is your responsibility to ensure a meaningful debate.
You are wrong. It is always the responsibility of the person
providing the fact to also provide the supporting evidence.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.
There is no logic in what you said. It's not even circular.
Post by Attila
I state as a fact Wolf 359 has a species of heat resistant green
snails living on it's surface. There is a fact for you. If I provide
the fact, you have to verify the fact. That is your responsibility to
ensure a meaningful debate.
Too bad, I'm not interested in your fact, and I have no argument against
your fact. Since you ask for the evidence, you are required to verify
the evidence.
Now provide evidence this is true.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.
Your simply saying something is a fact does not make it so.
Too bad you can't prove me wrong, so it will remain as fact.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-05-28 01:04:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
On Sat, 23 May 2020 16:02:24 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 5:43:49 PM UTC-7, "Sir Hømer Hall,
<...>
I've opted out of the heaven/hell track, ever since the EU
invented the Right To Be Forgotten. God hates that.
You can't opt out of the afterlife. Heaven or Hell, you get to
choose. Try to choose wisely.
Do you have anything other than threats to contribute?
In feeble minds Pascal's Wager never stales.
I was waiting for someone to come up with Pascal's Wager. Apparently
he doesn't know that it's been refuted to death. He just better hope
that he's chosen the right sky fairy to follow, or the
unchosen-but-actual one is liable to be really pissed at him.
Pascal's wager doesn't apply since those in the book of life are chosen
by God instead.
According to you but without supporting evidence.
What I said is a simple fact. It is the evidence.
Not as far as I am concerned.
Blind denial. You are required to verify the fact at the very least.
I am not required to do anything. You are the one trying to convince
me. Remember?
It's a two way street. If I provide the fact, you have to verify the
fact. That is your responsibility to ensure a meaningful debate.
You are wrong. It is always the responsibility of the person
providing the fact to also provide the supporting evidence.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.
There is no logic in what you said. It's not even circular.
It is the way facts work. Anyone can say anything is a fact but
actual facts have supporting evidence.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I state as a fact Wolf 359 has a species of heat resistant green
snails living on it's surface. There is a fact for you. If I provide
the fact, you have to verify the fact. That is your responsibility to
ensure a meaningful debate.
Too bad, I'm not interested in your fact, and I have no argument against
your fact. Since you ask for the evidence, you are required to verify
the evidence.
Now provide evidence this is true.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.
Your simply saying something is a fact does not make it so.
Too bad you can't prove me wrong, so it will remain as fact.
I don't need to prove you wrong. I have stated what I say is a fact.
According to you it is now your burden to verify the fact.

I am waiting.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-05-28 17:51:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
On Sat, 23 May 2020 16:02:24 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 5:43:49 PM UTC-7, "Sir Hømer Hall,
<...>
I've opted out of the heaven/hell track, ever since the EU
invented the Right To Be Forgotten. God hates that.
You can't opt out of the afterlife. Heaven or Hell, you get to
choose. Try to choose wisely.
Do you have anything other than threats to contribute?
In feeble minds Pascal's Wager never stales.
I was waiting for someone to come up with Pascal's Wager. Apparently
he doesn't know that it's been refuted to death. He just better hope
that he's chosen the right sky fairy to follow, or the
unchosen-but-actual one is liable to be really pissed at him.
Pascal's wager doesn't apply since those in the book of life are chosen
by God instead.
According to you but without supporting evidence.
What I said is a simple fact. It is the evidence.
Not as far as I am concerned.
Blind denial. You are required to verify the fact at the very least.
I am not required to do anything. You are the one trying to convince
me. Remember?
It's a two way street. If I provide the fact, you have to verify the
fact. That is your responsibility to ensure a meaningful debate.
You are wrong. It is always the responsibility of the person
providing the fact to also provide the supporting evidence.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.
There is no logic in what you said. It's not even circular.
It is the way facts work. Anyone can say anything is a fact but
actual facts have supporting evidence.
False. A fact is already the proven evidence. It doesn't need to be
proven again.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I state as a fact Wolf 359 has a species of heat resistant green
snails living on it's surface. There is a fact for you. If I provide
the fact, you have to verify the fact. That is your responsibility to
ensure a meaningful debate.
Too bad, I'm not interested in your fact, and I have no argument against
your fact. Since you ask for the evidence, you are required to verify
the evidence.
Now provide evidence this is true.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.
Your simply saying something is a fact does not make it so.
Too bad you can't prove me wrong, so it will remain as fact.
I don't need to prove you wrong. I have stated what I say is a fact.
According to you it is now your burden to verify the fact.
Too bad, you have no fact except your blind denial. There is nothing
else for me say.
Post by Attila
I am waiting.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-05-28 23:48:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
On Sat, 23 May 2020 16:02:24 -0700 (PDT), SkyEyes
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 5:43:49 PM UTC-7, "Sir Hømer Hall,
<...>
I've opted out of the heaven/hell track, ever since the EU
invented the Right To Be Forgotten. God hates that.
You can't opt out of the afterlife. Heaven or Hell, you get to
choose. Try to choose wisely.
Do you have anything other than threats to contribute?
In feeble minds Pascal's Wager never stales.
I was waiting for someone to come up with Pascal's Wager. Apparently
he doesn't know that it's been refuted to death. He just better hope
that he's chosen the right sky fairy to follow, or the
unchosen-but-actual one is liable to be really pissed at him.
Pascal's wager doesn't apply since those in the book of life are chosen
by God instead.
According to you but without supporting evidence.
What I said is a simple fact. It is the evidence.
Not as far as I am concerned.
Blind denial. You are required to verify the fact at the very least.
I am not required to do anything. You are the one trying to convince
me. Remember?
It's a two way street. If I provide the fact, you have to verify the
fact. That is your responsibility to ensure a meaningful debate.
You are wrong. It is always the responsibility of the person
providing the fact to also provide the supporting evidence.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.
There is no logic in what you said. It's not even circular.
It is the way facts work. Anyone can say anything is a fact but
actual facts have supporting evidence.
False. A fact is already the proven evidence. It doesn't need to be
proven again.
If it is actually accepted as a fact. You state something and say it
is a fact. That is not establishing it as a fact. An established
fact has supporting evidence that can be produced on demand.

You expect the statement that someone is chosen by some god to be
accepted as fact. I do not accept it. I reject it as an opinion and
nothing more.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I state as a fact Wolf 359 has a species of heat resistant green
snails living on it's surface. There is a fact for you. If I provide
the fact, you have to verify the fact. That is your responsibility to
ensure a meaningful debate.
Too bad, I'm not interested in your fact, and I have no argument against
your fact. Since you ask for the evidence, you are required to verify
the evidence.
Now provide evidence this is true.
The fact is already the evidence.
A fact is never evidence until it is proven to actually be a fact
through supporting evidence.
Your simply saying something is a fact does not make it so.
Too bad you can't prove me wrong, so it will remain as fact.
I don't need to prove you wrong. I have stated what I say is a fact.
According to you it is now your burden to verify the fact.
Too bad, you have no fact except your blind denial. There is nothing
else for me say.
You set the requirement and now you are refusing to either live up to
it or admit you were wrong. Since I have asked you several times if
you are ever wrong and you have yet to answer it is obvious no one
should pay any attention at all to anything you say.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I am waiting.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
Cloud Hobbit
2020-05-28 01:05:38 UTC
Permalink
I'm still waiting for you, or any of the other theist trolls, to present logical,
objective, verifiable evidence (you know, *facts* and *data*) that any god
exists. Can you do that?
DNA
DNA, far from being of divine origin, is just a long string of nucleotides composed of hydrogen,
oxygen, phosphorus, carbon and nitrogen (listed in no particular order). It's just chemistry.
No. It takes DNA to make DNA.
Provide a link to a research paper or precise claiming that. In fact, you need to provide links to *all* your claims. You have nothing to underpin your claims; all you do is repeat them endlessly with no supporting evidence. Why is that?
You don't find it in the natural chemical world.
But we find RNA in the wild, and, as I have been at pains to explain to you (with supporting cites), that (1) that RNA is plentiful and occurs naturally; (2) that it is unstable; (3) that it shares nucleotides and other chemical components with DNA; (4) that, given all this, it's a short step for RNA to evolve into DNA; and (5) that DNA changes frequently, especially during meiosis (cell division within reproductive cells). Were you even paying attention?
Furthermore, it is an~information~carrying molecule. The molecule without the
information has no use, purpose or function.
It's fucking chemistry, you idiot, it follows the laws of physics, it *has* no "purpose." And by the way, you've made another logical error: the Argument from Consequences.
The prime origin of this information could only have come from an intelligent
source.
And your evidence for this assertion is...what, exactly? All you do is repeat it, and you never provide any evidence to shore up your assertion. Cite, please.
Not from any chemical soup.
The "chemical soup" idea was discarded decades ago. Try to keep up. Proto-cells, including cell membranes, HAVE BEEN OBSERVED TO FORM IN MIXTURES OF CLAY AND SEAWATER. ("Hydrogels.") Do try reading for comprehension, for a change.
To form DNA, these nucleotides link up with sugars, phosphates, and
nitrogen bases (adenine [A], thymine [T], guanine [G] and cytosine [C]).
But it only happens in a living cell!
No, actually, it's been observed in the lab.
DNA is likely to have developed from RNA,
This is pure fantasy, And you obviously believe it. Why?
Because that's where the evidence points, dumbass. I provided you links to the current research, yet you don't provide any to shore up your argument. Why is that?
Jesus, but you're dim.
Brenda Nelson, A.A. #34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
Here's an idea I had not heard about.

https://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html
(Phys.org)—A team of chemists working at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, at Cambridge in the UK believes they have solved the mystery of how it was possible for life to begin on Earth over four billion years ago. In their paper published in the journal Nature Chemistry, the team describes how they were able to map reactions that produced two and three-carbon sugars, amino acids, ribonucleotides and glycerol—the material necessary for metabolism and for creating the building blocks of proteins and ribonucleic acid molecules and also for allowing for the creation of lipids that form cell membranes.

Scientists have debated for years the various possibilities that could have led to life evolving on Earth, and the arguments have only grown more heated in recent years as many have suggested that it did not happen here it all, instead, it was brought to us from comets or some other celestial body. Most of the recent debate has found scientists in one of three chicken-or-the-egg first camps: RNA world advocates, metabolism-first supporters and those who believe that cell membranes must have developed first.

The chemists with this new effort believe they have found a way to show that all three arguments are both right and wrong—they believe they have found a way to show that everything necessary for life to evolve could have done so from just hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen cyanide and ultraviolet light and that those building blocks could have all existed at the same time—in their paper, they report that using just those three basic ingredients they were able to produce more than 50 nucleic acids—precursors to DNA and RNA molecules. They note that early meteorites carried with them ingredients that would react with nitrogen already in the atmosphere, producing a lot of hydrogen cyanide. By dissolving in water, it could have very easily come into contact with hydrogen sulfide, while being exposed to ultraviolet light from the sun. And that, they claim, would have been all that was needed to get things going.

The findings by the team are sure to garner a great deal of interest in the scientific community and others will no doubt be testing and commenting on their findings. If what they claim passes muster, their work will likely be remembered as one of the great achievements of our time.
d***@cox.net
2020-05-28 18:28:00 UTC
Permalink
<...>
I've opted out of the heaven/hell track, ever since the
EU invented the Right To Be Forgotten. God hates that.
You can't opt out of the afterlife. Heaven or Hell,
you get to choose. Try to choose wisely.
Doesn't this alleged god possess "infinite mercy"? How could
such a being torture humans forever? Simply for not
believing in what isn't apparent?
God does not torture humans forever.
That is not what many christians have told me.
If he tortures humans at all he's an evil god.
God doesn't but the message is still it's your judgment on the way you lived you
life in the flesh. Be good and listen to God.
Why should anyone listen to anything that has no supporting evidence
that it even exists?
You're..........still blind.
You............still lie.
Name one time.
You just did, liar. We both know I am not blind and it is apparent to
anyone who reads this.
Nope, simpleton one, you're blind to truth.
then they should also know that I don't lie on the ng.
You lie constantly. You accuse me of being blind with no basis for
saying so and you state I do not support things I have not said.
You're blind to truth.
the dukester, American-American
Attila
2020-05-28 19:07:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
<...>
I've opted out of the heaven/hell track, ever since the
EU invented the Right To Be Forgotten. God hates that.
You can't opt out of the afterlife. Heaven or Hell,
you get to choose. Try to choose wisely.
Doesn't this alleged god possess "infinite mercy"? How could
such a being torture humans forever? Simply for not
believing in what isn't apparent?
God does not torture humans forever.
That is not what many christians have told me.
If he tortures humans at all he's an evil god.
God doesn't but the message is still it's your judgment on the way you lived you
life in the flesh. Be good and listen to God.
Why should anyone listen to anything that has no supporting evidence
that it even exists?
You're..........still blind.
You............still lie.
Name one time.
You just did, liar. We both know I am not blind and it is apparent to
anyone who reads this.
Nope, simpleton one, you're blind to truth.
What makes what you say the truth? You never support anything and
push your silly superstition as if it has any meaning in the real
world and you expect everyone to simply accept it as being valid.

I do not accept it and never will without supporting evidence.

I have no reason not to consider everything you say as myth or,
considering how hard you push it, deliberate lies calculated to
deceive for some reason.
Post by d***@cox.net
then they should also know that I don't lie on the ng.
You lie constantly. You accuse me of being blind with no basis for
saying so and you state I do not support things I have not said.
You're blind to truth.
You say something is the truth and you expect me to simply take your
word for it because you say so.

No.

In my world truth comes with supporting evidence and all else is myth
or legend at best and deliberate lies at worst.

You lie when you say I am blind because my vision is within normal
limits. I have it checked once per year.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
d***@cox.net
2020-05-28 18:29:25 UTC
Permalink
==
I'm still waiting for you, or any of the other theist trolls, to present logical,
objective, verifiable evidence (you know, *facts* and *data*) that any god
exists. Can you do that?
DNA
DNA, far from being of divine origin, is just a long string of nucleotides composed of hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, carbon and nitrogen (listed in no particular order). It's just chemistry. To form DNA, these nucleotides link up with sugars, phosphates, and nitrogen bases (adenine [A], thymine [T], guanine [G] and cytosine [C]).
And stopping you right there, you've already demonstrated more knowledge
of DNA than Andrew, whose mantra is to chant "DNA" at us over and over, ever has.
And probably ever will -- I gave him a couple of trivial, first week, first course quizzes
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/I2Qhr98zmm4/0D3osJjcBwAJ
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/5jtXV8R6yss/4H6SH9UyAgAJ
He answered with the sound of receding footsteps.
He did once try pawning off a video which traced the DNA-mRNA-ribosiime-tRNA
sequence, but when I asked him to paraphrase it in his own words ... well, take a guess.
Indeed. Neither Andrew nor aaa understand the least thing about DNA, RNA, mitosis, meiosis, cell division - or anything concerning how genetics actually works. Trying to enlighten them really *is* throwing pearls before swine.
Brenda
==
I notice you couldn't provide your own answers.
Was that addressed to me?
I guess so.
If so, take a shot at the two quizzes linked to there, and I'll grade your answers.
Not me. I never claimed to know the answers just like you can't.
The teacher does not give out answers in advance of the student taking the test.
Oko
Are you addressing that to me?
the dukester, American-American
the dukester, American-American
Oko tillo
2020-05-28 23:39:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
==
I'm still waiting for you, or any of the other theist trolls, to present logical,
objective, verifiable evidence (you know, *facts* and *data*) that any god
exists. Can you do that?
DNA
DNA, far from being of divine origin, is just a long string of nucleotides composed of hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, carbon and nitrogen (listed in no particular order). It's just chemistry. To form DNA, these nucleotides link up with sugars, phosphates, and nitrogen bases (adenine [A], thymine [T], guanine [G] and cytosine [C]).
And stopping you right there, you've already demonstrated more knowledge
of DNA than Andrew, whose mantra is to chant "DNA" at us over and over, ever has.
And probably ever will -- I gave him a couple of trivial, first week, first course quizzes
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/I2Qhr98zmm4/0D3osJjcBwAJ
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.atheism/5jtXV8R6yss/4H6SH9UyAgAJ
He answered with the sound of receding footsteps.
He did once try pawning off a video which traced the DNA-mRNA-ribosiime-tRNA
sequence, but when I asked him to paraphrase it in his own words ... well, take a guess.
Indeed. Neither Andrew nor aaa understand the least thing about DNA, RNA, mitosis, meiosis, cell division - or anything concerning how genetics actually works. Trying to enlighten them really *is* throwing pearls before swine.
Brenda
==
==
Post by d***@cox.net
I notice you couldn't provide your own answers.
Was that addressed to me?
I guess so.
If so, take a shot at the two quizzes linked to there, and I'll grade your answers.
Not me. I never claimed to know the answers just like you can't.
Like I can't what?
Post by d***@cox.net
The teacher does not give out answers in advance of the student taking the test.
Oko
Post by d***@cox.net
Oko
Are you addressing that to me?
the dukester, American-American
the dukester, American-American
d***@cox.net
2020-05-28 18:40:37 UTC
Permalink
Prove it, in-your-face moron.
You atheists are all alike. "Prove it, prove it, prove it!"
Then when somebody proves it, you then resort
to hollering, "Liar!"
Grow up.
You have yet to "prove" anything. Nor have you even provided the least shred of *evidence* for your position.
And like Homer said, you atheists don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to
supporting your own proclamations.
*You* and your fellow-travelers are the ones making the positive claim that a god exists.
Absolutely.
But you can't back it up.
We provide everything that exists.
That is a claim, not supporting evidence.
I have defined God as the eternal creator
that willed all things into existence 13.8 billion years ago.
I can define anything I like. That doesn't mean it actually means
anything.
But I use scientific evidence and sound reasoning.
I won't lie like you do and make up something.
How do I know? You never provide supporting evidence.
If you lack supporting evidence yourself, you're in the wrong discussion
The burden of proof is on *you* to provide evidence that your claim is true - that's how logic
works, Puke. All we atheists are saying is "we don't believe you." The burden of proof is not on us.
That's great, don't believe me. It's your funeral in the long run. You have
nothing for your own position.
Another meaningless response made in an attempt to divert attention
from the actual issue. Which you once again have ignored.
You are unable to offer anything for consideration.
That is not why I am here.
Thus you shouldn't care if I play on your ignorance.
All you can say is "we
don't believe you". If you choose to ignore the facts, what else of truth can I
offer?
What facts? I submit your so-called facts are myth and legend with no
supporting evidence.
But you lack the evidence to know truth. In fact, if you can't know truth
anyway, you don't know one way or the other. So you don't need for me to
support my words if you don't know truth..
I'm still waiting for you, or any of the other theist trolls, to present logical, objective, verifiable evidence (you know, *facts* and *data*) that any god exists. Can you do that?
You have yet to find error with what I say.
Another meaningless statement meant to draw attention away from your
continued lack of supporting evidence.
Where's my error, brain boy.
Still no supporting evidence for anything you say.
Heeheehee. This is going to be fun.
the dukester, American-American
Cloud Hobbit
2020-05-28 18:53:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Prove it, in-your-face moron.
You atheists are all alike. "Prove it, prove it, prove it!"
Then when somebody proves it, you then resort
to hollering, "Liar!"
Grow up.
You have yet to "prove" anything. Nor have you even provided the least shred of *evidence* for your position.
And like Homer said, you atheists don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to
supporting your own proclamations.
*You* and your fellow-travelers are the ones making the positive claim that a god exists.
Absolutely.
But you can't back it up.
We provide everything that exists.
That is a claim, not supporting evidence.
I have defined God as the eternal creator
that willed all things into existence 13.8 billion years ago.
I can define anything I like. That doesn't mean it actually means
anything.
But I use scientific evidence and sound reasoning.
I won't lie like you do and make up something.
How do I know? You never provide supporting evidence.
If you lack supporting evidence yourself, you're in the wrong discussion
The burden of proof is on *you* to provide evidence that your claim is true - that's how logic
works, Puke. All we atheists are saying is "we don't believe you." The burden of proof is not on us.
That's great, don't believe me. It's your funeral in the long run. You have
nothing for your own position.
Another meaningless response made in an attempt to divert attention
from the actual issue. Which you once again have ignored.
You are unable to offer anything for consideration.
That is not why I am here.
Thus you shouldn't care if I play on your ignorance.
All you can say is "we
don't believe you". If you choose to ignore the facts, what else of truth can I
offer?
What facts? I submit your so-called facts are myth and legend with no
supporting evidence.
But you lack the evidence to know truth. In fact, if you can't know truth
anyway, you don't know one way or the other. So you don't need for me to
support my words if you don't know truth..
I'm still waiting for you, or any of the other theist trolls, to present logical, objective, verifiable evidence (you know, *facts* and *data*) that any god exists. Can you do that?
You have yet to find error with what I say.
Another meaningless statement meant to draw attention away from your
continued lack of supporting evidence.
Where's my error, brain boy.
Still no supporting evidence for anything you say.
Heeheehee. This is going to be fun.
the dukester
And none for anything you claim. That's why you do the evasion dance when you are asked for evidence, you don't have any.

If you did, you'd be shouting it from the rooftops.
But you aren't. Because you can't.
That would make you a liar, not that we don't already know that about you.

You're a fraud duke and you know it and you know that we know it.

Thankfully, my experience has been that YOU are not a typical Catholic.
You are just someone who chooses to annoy us for no reason other than to get attention.
Attila
2020-05-28 19:22:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Prove it, in-your-face moron.
You atheists are all alike. "Prove it, prove it, prove it!"
Then when somebody proves it, you then resort
to hollering, "Liar!"
Grow up.
You have yet to "prove" anything. Nor have you even provided the least shred of *evidence* for your position.
And like Homer said, you atheists don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to
supporting your own proclamations.
*You* and your fellow-travelers are the ones making the positive claim that a god exists.
Absolutely.
But you can't back it up.
We provide everything that exists.
That is a claim, not supporting evidence.
I have defined God as the eternal creator
that willed all things into existence 13.8 billion years ago.
I can define anything I like. That doesn't mean it actually means
anything.
But I use scientific evidence and sound reasoning.
I have never seen you present anything that is actual evidence that
could convince anyone of anything. Your so-called evidence consists
of "Oh, look! A pile of poop! That proves there is a god!". IOW, a
useless waste of space supporting nothing and convincing no one.

Your reasoning is irrelevant. You can present any and all of the
logic and reasoning you like but if actual unambiguous, unrelated and
verifiable evidence is not included I won't even bother to read it.

Your silly superstition relies on faith for acceptance and that word
is meaningless to me. I do not and will never have faith as any part
of anything I deem acceptable or even close to being valid.
Post by d***@cox.net
I won't lie like you do and make up something.
How do I know? You never provide supporting evidence.
If you lack supporting evidence yourself, you're in the wrong discussion
Another meaningless response made in an attempt to divert attention
from the actual issue. Which you once again have ignored.

Where is your supporting evidence?
Post by d***@cox.net
The burden of proof is on *you* to provide evidence that your claim is true - that's how logic
works, Puke. All we atheists are saying is "we don't believe you." The burden of proof is not on us.
That's great, don't believe me. It's your funeral in the long run. You have
nothing for your own position.
Another meaningless response made in an attempt to divert attention
from the actual issue. Which you once again have ignored.
You are unable to offer anything for consideration.
That is not why I am here.
Thus you shouldn't care if I play on your ignorance.
Once again Captain Misdirection is attempting to change the
discussion.

The issue is "The burden of proof is on *you* to provide evidence that
your claim is true" and as usual you are ready to discuss anything
else as long as it is something else.
Post by d***@cox.net
All you can say is "we
don't believe you". If you choose to ignore the facts, what else of truth can I
offer?
What facts? I submit your so-called facts are myth and legend with no
supporting evidence.
But you lack the evidence to know truth.
If what you say has any truth there must be supporting evidence to
that effect. Since you are asserting it as truth it is your
responsibility to prove this evidence.

Where is it?
Post by d***@cox.net
In fact, if you can't know truth
anyway, you don't know one way or the other. So you don't need for me to
support my words if you don't know truth..
Again you are trying to change the direction of the discussion away
from the actual issue and in some other direction - any other
direction as long as it is something else.
Post by d***@cox.net
I'm still waiting for you, or any of the other theist trolls, to present logical, objective, verifiable evidence (you know, *facts* and *data*) that any god exists. Can you do that?
You have yet to find error with what I say.
Another meaningless statement meant to draw attention away from your
continued lack of supporting evidence.
Where's my error, brain boy.
Still no supporting evidence for anything you say.
Heeheehee. This is going to be fun.
You are still avoiding the actual issue. One would think you would
prefer to talk about something else - anything else as long as it
isn't the actual issue.

"I'm still waiting for you, or any of the other theist trolls, to
present logical, objective, verifiable evidence (you know, *facts* and
*data*) that any god exists. Can you do that? "

Evidently not.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
Patrick B
2020-05-28 21:14:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
I have never seen you present anything that is actual evidence that
could convince anyone of anything. Your so-called evidence consists
of "Oh, look! A pile of poop! That proves there is a god!".
Nah. A pile of poop would prove you were there.
Attila
2020-05-28 21:45:14 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 28 May 2020 17:14:18 -0400, Patrick B <***@ERINET.COM>
in alt.atheism with message-id
Post by Patrick B
Post by Attila
I have never seen you present anything that is actual evidence that
could convince anyone of anything. Your so-called evidence consists
of "Oh, look! A pile of poop! That proves there is a god!".
Nah. A pile of poop would prove you were there.
At least it would prove something had been there - which is an
exception to what is usually presented as "evidence" whenever some
silly superstition is involved.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

Trump 2020

There are four despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests
Reporters

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
SkyEyes
2020-05-28 23:31:35 UTC
Permalink
I'm still waiting for you, or any of the other theist trolls, to
present logical, objective, verifiable evidence (you know,
*facts* and *data*) that any god exists. Can you do that?
DNA
DNA, far from being of divine origin, is just a long string of
nucleotides composed of hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, carbon and
nitrogen (listed in no particular order). It's just chemistry. To
form DNA, these nucleotides link up with sugars, phosphates, and
nitrogen bases (adenine [A], thymine [T], guanine [G] and cytosine
[C]). DNA is likely to have developed from RNA, which has been
observed forming in clay hydrogels in and around ocean vents and
which is unstable. It's a simple step to go from one
self-replicating thing (RNA) to a more complex one (DNA) because
neither substance replicates perfectly. When RNA and DNA replicate,
the nitrogen bases (A, T, G, and C) which form genes which line up
into chromosomes can and frequently do get scrambled, or fall out of
line, or get halved or doubled. These happenstances cause the
proteins that make up cells that make up organs to be produced and
folded differently, which is what causes changes in the organism.
The first protocells did not need complicated genetic information to
function; that developed over vast periods of time.
What you fail to understand, Andrew, is that there is no
hard-and-fast line between "living" and "non-living" things.
The living creates order by defying the second law of thermodynamics.
Really? Please quote the second law of thermodynamics:

*
*
*
*
*
*
The non-living can't create order by obeying the second law of
thermodynamics. That is a clear dividing line separating the living and
non-living.
Except that, as I've shown, there *is* no "clear dividing line* between life and non-life. You can insist that there is all you like, but unless and until you provide links/cites to support your assertions, that's all they are.
The DNA is clearly a structure of order.
It's clearly the result of *chemistry*, is what it is.
Since order can never be
created by obeying the second law, order can never appear automatically
by itself. Therefore, DNA must be the creation of God.
Please provide links/cites to some scientific study supporting your contention. Otherwise, it's just you asserting that something is factual.

And I'll leave my description of things that are neither living nor non-living right here where you can refute it by providing cites/links to actual scientific studies.
Off the
top of my head I can think of several things that meet some of the
qualifications of "life" (the capacity for growth, reproduction,
functional activity, and continual change preceding death) but not
all of them: crystals, for one, and viruses certainly. Fire is
another. Philosophers and biologists have been arguing for decades
whether or not crystals are alive
(https://www.wired.com/2013/01/living-crystal/); same thing for
viruses
(https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-viruses-alive-2004/).
Until and unless you recognize this gray area, Andrew, your
challenges will be met with ridicule. Go find an online course and
study this stuff - it's out there for anyone to find. You don't need
to remain ignorant.
Brenda Nelson, A.A. #34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
***@cox.net
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...