I know you're blind.
You say that because your silly superstition requires you accept
certain things without question and I simply refuse to do that.
You may "see" something because you are required to say so by your
personal beliefs or your silly superstition but neither those beliefs
or your superstition means anything at all to me.
God will not let you off because of perpetrated ignorance.
You state that as if is a fact while it is nothing more than your
belief. If it is a fact where is the supporting evidence?
Well, I guess you will have to express massive ignorance about God to get away
I am not trying to get away with anything Major Misdirection. I am
pointing out how you constantly make assertions without supporting
Sure you are. You keep accusing me of sending you off in a wrong direction.
I accuse you of not addressing the point under discussion directly and
instead trying to divert the discussion into a different direction.
It's clear I know God and you don't.
I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the existence of any
Of course, it those assertions are just your beliefs and not facts you
need no such evidence.
Are your assertions facts?
Of course they are.
If they are facts they require supporting evidence. Something you
don't seem to actually have.
You don't what? Have supporting evidence? If not how do you know
they are facts? Why should anyone else pay any attention to you?
, and if you have to ask, you also have to admit
that you don't know the answer.
But I am not asserting anything as being factual. You are. I have
nothing that requires any answer.
Give a link to an example of where I have told a lie. Otherwise
either retract the accusation or let it stand as evidence of your
ongoing lies and deceits.
Forever more in your profession of blindness.
I see you once again fail to provide such a link.
You said "you fail to see" over a hundred times. Enough said.
Yes I have and I will continue to indicate your failure to provide any
supporting evidence for what you say are facts and what I dispute as
being factual. How would you suggest I indicate my ongoing refusal to
accept your assertions without such supporting evidence?
My intentions in what I am saying are clear and your continued
"misunderstanding" of my meaning in using the word only helps draw
attention to the fact that rather than providing supporting evidence
or admitting you have no such evidence you simply try to divert the
discussion into a different direction by accusing me of being blind.
Do you really think you are fooling anyone?
Or is your understanding of the English language so poor you are
unaware of certain standard phrases and how they are used?
Your pink elephant won't help you.
Exactly where did I say I expected it to help me in any way? That is
just another example of Major Misdirection at work.
I believe you are led by a pink elephant.
As a belief that needs no supporting evidence. Nor does it need to be
rational. People believe all sorts of crazy things.
Your answer has nothing to do with the question which I note you
avoiding answering. That is why you are known as Major Misdirection.
the dukester, American-American
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.
There are four despicable occupations:
National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democrat Party.
Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.