Discussion:
Every atheist fears death.
(too old to reply)
ravn
2020-02-04 22:05:43 UTC
Permalink
The mind is dependent on the body. The body exists in the world. So,
the source is the world, not the mind.
That is an illusion. The body is projected by the mind.
On what objective evidence do you base that on? Because you're apparently appealing to a doctrine, not anything based on reality. If you're appealing to doctrine, that has no explanatory force.
Michael Christ
2020-02-04 22:59:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
The mind is dependent on the body. The body exists in the world. So,
the source is the world, not the mind.
That is an illusion. The body is projected by the mind.
On what objective evidence do you base that on? Because you're apparently appealing to a doctrine, not anything based on reality. If you're appealing to doctrine, that has no explanatory force.
Ravn doctrine, aaa. :-).




Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
aaa
2020-02-05 14:34:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
The mind is dependent on the body. The body exists in the world. So,
the source is the world, not the mind.
That is an illusion. The body is projected by the mind.
On what objective evidence do you base that on? Because you're
apparently appealing to a doctrine, not anything based on reality. If
you're appealing to doctrine, that has no explanatory force.
Ravn doctrine, aaa.  :-).
Indeed.

This is how science has destroyed modern philosophy.
Michael Christ
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Michael Christ
2020-02-04 23:00:46 UTC
Permalink
The presence of noisemaker Ravn inept sinner snaky snippage, so the post
must be discarded.




Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
aaa
2020-02-04 23:06:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
The mind is dependent on the body. The body exists in the world.
So, the source is the world, not the mind.
That is an illusion. The body is projected by the mind.
On what objective evidence do you base that on? Because you're
apparently appealing to a doctrine, not anything based on reality. If
you're appealing to doctrine, that has no explanatory force.
That is a philosophical fact which is above and before science.

There is a modern mistake to search or demand physical evidence for
philosophy when philosophy is actually superior to all possible physical
evidence. It's putting the cart before the donkey.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-04 23:27:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
There is a modern mistake to search or demand physical evidence for
philosophy when philosophy is actually superior to all possible physical
evidence. It's putting the cart before the donkey.

Only for you.
Nobody believes You.
Nobody agrees with you.
Nothing in reality supports you.

You re just a big nothing burger, with unicorn sauce.
aaa
2020-02-04 23:52:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
There is a modern mistake to search or demand physical evidence
for philosophy when philosophy is actually superior to all
possible physical evidence. It's putting the cart before the
donkey.
Only for you. Nobody believes You. Nobody agrees with you. Nothing
in reality supports you.
You re just a big nothing burger, with unicorn sauce.
Blind denial again.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
ravn
2020-02-06 21:03:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
The mind is dependent on the body. The body exists in the world.
So, the source is the world, not the mind.
That is an illusion. The body is projected by the mind.
On what objective evidence do you base that on? Because you're
apparently appealing to a doctrine, not anything based on reality. If
you're appealing to doctrine, that has no explanatory force.
That is a philosophical fact which is above and before science.
All species have to interact with the world sucessfully, in order to survive as a species. Science, in essence, is the study of the world. If humans hadn't figured out the world, to whatever extent that they could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they wouldn't have survived as a species. So, there is no before "science". Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead to theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If your so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical affairs, it's useless.
aaa
2020-02-07 15:12:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
The mind is dependent on the body. The body exists in the
world. So, the source is the world, not the mind.
That is an illusion. The body is projected by the mind.
On what objective evidence do you base that on? Because you're
apparently appealing to a doctrine, not anything based on
reality. If you're appealing to doctrine, that has no explanatory
force.
That is a philosophical fact which is above and before science.
All species have to interact with the world sucessfully, in order to
survive as a species. Science, in essence, is the study of the world.
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
Post by ravn
If humans hadn't figured out the world, to whatever extent that they
could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they wouldn't
have survived as a species. So, there is no before "science".
Philosophy is before science.
Post by ravn
Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead to
theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If your
so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical affairs,
it's useless.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Michael Christ
2020-02-07 22:40:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
The mind is dependent on the body. The body exists in the
world. So, the source is the world, not the mind.
That is an illusion. The body is projected by the mind.
On what objective evidence do you base that on? Because you're
apparently appealing to a doctrine, not anything based on
reality. If you're appealing to doctrine, that has no explanatory
force.
That is a philosophical fact which is above and before science.
All species have to interact with the world sucessfully, in order to
survive as a species. Science, in essence, is the study of the world.
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
Post by ravn
If humans hadn't figured out  the world, to whatever extent that they
could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they wouldn't
have survived as a species. So, there is no before "science".
Philosophy is before science.
Post by ravn
Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead to
theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If your
so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical affairs,
it's useless.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
Nothing gets in Ravn's way! :-).




Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
aaa
2020-02-08 15:12:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
The mind is dependent on the body. The body exists in the
world. So, the source is the world, not the mind.
That is an illusion. The body is projected by the mind.
On what objective evidence do you base that on? Because you're
apparently appealing to a doctrine, not anything based on
reality. If you're appealing to doctrine, that has no explanatory
force.
That is a philosophical fact which is above and before science.
All species have to interact with the world sucessfully, in order to
survive as a species. Science, in essence, is the study of the world.
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
Post by ravn
If humans hadn't figured out  the world, to whatever extent that they
could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they wouldn't
have survived as a species. So, there is no before "science".
Philosophy is before science.
Post by ravn
Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead to
theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If your
so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical affairs,
it's useless.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
Nothing gets in Ravn's way!  :-).
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Michael Christ
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Michael Christ
2020-02-08 22:34:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
The mind is dependent on the body. The body exists in the
world. So, the source is the world, not the mind.
That is an illusion. The body is projected by the mind.
On what objective evidence do you base that on? Because you're
apparently appealing to a doctrine, not anything based on
reality. If you're appealing to doctrine, that has no explanatory
force.
That is a philosophical fact which is above and before science.
All species have to interact with the world sucessfully, in order to
survive as a species. Science, in essence, is the study of the world.
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
Post by ravn
If humans hadn't figured out  the world, to whatever extent that they
could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they wouldn't
have survived as a species. So, there is no before "science".
Philosophy is before science.
Post by ravn
Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead to
theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If your
so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical affairs,
it's useless.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
Nothing gets in Ravn's way!  :-).
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
He doesn't know what day it is because he doesn't trust the sound of his
own voice! He takes it out on us, of course.




Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
ravn
2020-02-10 23:06:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
He doesn't know what day it is because he doesn't trust the sound of his
own voice! He takes it out on us, of course.
You're a degenerate who makes a lot of noise & not much sense. & you're determined to make that your epitaph. That hole you're digging for naysayers is your own grave.
Michael Christ
2020-02-08 22:45:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
By the way, the Lord told me and showed me that. I was standing on the
top of a hilly range and looking down at all the trees and the ocean
beyond and I was thinking how beautiful it was and the Lord placed in me
the thought, 'Everything is dead'.

I said, how could this be Lord, not believing Him.

It wasn't until I happened to break off a small branch of a tree and
look at it in my hand as I walked back to my car that I understood what
He had told me.

You can't invest your hope in the things of this world, in anything of
this world, that is for sure. Is it any wonder then why the Lord, the
Saviour says, 'I am the way, the truth and the life??'




Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Kevrob
2020-02-08 23:09:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
By the way, the Lord told me and showed me that. I was standing on the
top of a hilly range and looking down at all the trees and the ocean
beyond and I was thinking how beautiful it was and the Lord placed in me
the thought, 'Everything is dead'.
In sane, rational people-speak:

"The thought occurred to McLoon: `Everything is dead.'"
Post by Michael Christ
I said, how could this be Lord, not believing Him.
TL:DR @ *

McLoon muttered a question to his ghod, thinking that
imaginary being had communicated with him.
Post by Michael Christ
It wasn't until I happened to break off a small branch of a tree and
look at it in my hand as I walked back to my car that I understood what
He had told me.
McLoon snapped a twig off a tree, killing that part of it.
If the branch was too large, he may have harmed the tree.
He then concocted some theological meaning out of his musings.
Post by Michael Christ
You can't invest your hope in the things of this world,
in anything of this world, that is for sure.
Placing one's hope in some non-existent alternate universe
doesn't make any sense.
Post by Michael Christ
Is it any wonder then why the Lord, the Saviour says,
More properly, "why the authors of ancient religious
texts put this saying in the mouth of their hero.."
Post by Michael Christ
'I am the way, > the truth and the life??'
It makes life easier for those incapable of finding meaning
in their own thoughts, actions and lives, to concentrate on
some imagined figure who stands in for the natural forces
the universe operates under - those who can't come to grips
with the idea that the universe doesn't have any as yet
discovered teleology?


* NcLoon is nuts. He thinks his ghod talks to him.

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Michael Christ
2020-02-09 01:53:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by Michael Christ
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
By the way, the Lord told me and showed me that. I was standing on the
top of a hilly range and looking down at all the trees and the ocean
beyond and I was thinking how beautiful it was and the Lord placed in me
the thought, 'Everything is dead'.
"The thought occurred to McLoon: `Everything is dead.'"
Post by Michael Christ
I said, how could this be Lord, not believing Him.
McLoon muttered a question to his ghod, thinking that
imaginary being had communicated with him.
Post by Michael Christ
It wasn't until I happened to break off a small branch of a tree and
look at it in my hand as I walked back to my car that I understood what
He had told me.
McLoon snapped a twig off a tree, killing that part of it.
If the branch was too large, he may have harmed the tree.
He then concocted some theological meaning out of his musings.
Post by Michael Christ
You can't invest your hope in the things of this world,
in anything of this world, that is for sure.
Placing one's hope in some non-existent alternate universe
doesn't make any sense.
Post by Michael Christ
Is it any wonder then why the Lord, the Saviour says,
More properly, "why the authors of ancient religious
texts put this saying in the mouth of their hero.."
Post by Michael Christ
'I am the way, > the truth and the life??'
It makes life easier for those incapable of finding meaning
in their own thoughts, actions and lives, to concentrate on
some imagined figure who stands in for the natural forces
the universe operates under - those who can't come to grips
with the idea that the universe doesn't have any as yet
discovered teleology?
* NcLoon is nuts. He thinks his ghod talks to him.
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
:-).

You can't pull down the truth, Gertrude, no matter how hard you try.

Everything is dead, just like the Lord said. Lasting life has been
severed from us just like the broken off tree branch and you are just
watching it pass into dust...like your life.

Don't bother having yourself cremated it is a waste of time, you won't
escape your Creator. We are more than just physical passing away
beings. We are spirit beings and all our cells have been replaced a
number of times and yet we remain, our personalities, our ways, our true
substance.

A reckoning is inevitable and a special reward for those who wipe their
ass on the truth.





Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-09 21:54:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
You can't pull down the truth, Gertrude, no matter how hard you try.
Why do you keep trying?
Post by Michael Christ
Everything is dead, just like the Lord said. Lasting life has been
severed from us just like the broken off tree branch and you are just
watching it pass into dust...like your life.

I guess that means you're dead too. You are part of everything. Especially the part that is made entirely of bullshit.
Post by Michael Christ
Don't bother having yourself cremated it is a waste of time, you won't
escape your Creator. We are more than just physical passing away
beings. We are spirit beings and all our cells have been replaced a
number of times and yet we remain, our personalities, our ways, our true
substance.

No such thing as spirit beings.
Post by Michael Christ
A reckoning is inevitable and a special reward for those who wipe their
ass on the truth.

Yep, you're going to be very aware of it because you're a heretic and a liar.

You are brain dead when it comes to truth, reality, or religion. You just make it up. You should work for a political party.

Everyone knows that the FSM is the true God of the universe. He has the perfect message for all mankind.
He doesn't lie and he doesn't play favorites with our lives. He understands that there is no such thing as "fallen man" because he never considered being that vengeful over a bite of fruit.

FSM wants us all to be happy and not treat those who are nonbelievers as evil. They're just not very bright and very confused.

Life is for living and mistakes are part of life.
Those who don't believe are missing out on one helluva After life.

Let them be. They will never experience the pure joy of being touched by his Noodly appendages. They have rejected Him and His message of truth and joy for all.

He doesn't try and scare people with tales of eternal pain and suffering for the smallest of crimes, most of which wouldn't be crimes to a sane person.

FSM doesn't care if you believe or not. Its your loss if you reject him.
He's the master of the universe and has no need for us to pretend to love and adore him. He knows nothing can harm him and no lie can ever disprove his existence.

He leaves you alone to figure things out by yourself.
If you aren't smart enough to understand his message, then he wouldn't want you boring him throughout eternity.

He never says anything made itself. He knows that all He had to do was just set things up so nature and the law of cause and effect could take effect over billions of years.

Www.venganza.org

Believe.

Ramen.

Say be upon you.
Kevrob
2020-02-10 16:57:36 UTC
Permalink
Don't bother having yourself cremated it is a waste of time....
I'm an organ donor. I won't need my body after I croak. Now, if we
had the tech to upload a consciousness into an artificial construct,
I might avail myself of that. Otherwise, my mental patterns will
dissipate, as any mind would.

--

Kevin R
a.a #2310
d***@cox.net
2020-02-11 22:12:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Don't bother having yourself cremated it is a waste of time....
I'm an organ donor. I won't need my body after I croak. Now, if we
had the tech to upload a consciousness into an artificial construct,
I might avail myself of that. Otherwise, my mental patterns will
dissipate, as any mind would.
Your body rots away any way you look at it. And very quickly.

It's your soul that is indestructive, and just as Jesus returned with a new
glorified body but still with the marks of life, so will you IF YOU ARE SAVED.
the dukester, American-American
LinuxGal
2020-02-11 23:39:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Your body rots away any way you look at it. And very quickly.
It's your soul that is indestructive
Jesus said its destroyable.

Matthew 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are
not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able
to destroy both soul and body in hell.
--
I have spoken.

https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
Attila
2020-02-12 01:15:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Kevrob
Don't bother having yourself cremated it is a waste of time....
I'm an organ donor. I won't need my body after I croak. Now, if we
had the tech to upload a consciousness into an artificial construct,
I might avail myself of that. Otherwise, my mental patterns will
dissipate, as any mind would.
Your body rots away any way you look at it. And very quickly.
It's your soul that is indestructive, and just as Jesus returned with a new
glorified body but still with the marks of life, so will you IF YOU ARE SAVED.
You hope. You don't have a shred of supporting evidence for any of
that.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
Kevrob
2020-02-13 17:45:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Kevrob
Don't bother having yourself cremated it is a waste of time....
I'm an organ donor. I won't need my body after I croak. Now, if we
had the tech to upload a consciousness into an artificial construct,
I might avail myself of that. Otherwise, my mental patterns will
dissipate, as any mind would.
Your body rots away any way you look at it. And very quickly.
It's your soul that is indestructive,
More creative spelling from Earl....
Post by d***@cox.net
...and just as Jesus returned with a new glorified body but
still with the marks of life, so will you IF YOU ARE SAVED.
This is off-charter proselytizing.

[quote]

The Cat-Herding Rules and Regulations of alt.atheism and Some Information

1 All are welcome in the newsgroup, whether they're atheists or not, as
long as they are not trolls.
2 Proselytizing of ANY religion is NOT welcome! (Those guilty of this
bad nettiquette will be treated as they deserve!)
3 This newsgroup exists for atheists to discuss anything of interest to
them and other atheists, although others who are honestly interested
in joining a discussion and are not trolls are welcome. Trolls will be
treated as what they are.

[/quote] This, and more @

http://web.archive.org/web/20160314200548/http://alt-atheism.org/atheism:faq

Earl will now deny he is "p-wording," the troll. the troll.

Cue John Prine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEhqzOeJnto

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
ravn
2020-02-10 23:02:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
aaa
2020-02-11 14:18:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-11 15:56:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-11 16:50:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-11 20:05:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-11 20:57:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-11 21:19:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.

Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-11 21:35:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-11 21:53:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.

It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.

If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
discussion of the subject at:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy

Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-12 17:16:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-12 18:01:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.

Did you bother to read my reference?
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-12 19:42:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-12 20:22:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.

If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-13 15:43:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-13 20:16:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-14 01:03:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-14 01:59:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-14 17:53:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
I'm just pointing out the fact.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
It has everything to do with the absolute stupidity of the doctors of
philosophy instead.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-14 18:15:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
I'm just pointing out the fact.
Why do you insist on including factors that have nothing to do with
the issue?

Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are all irrelevant.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
It has everything to do with the absolute stupidity of the doctors of
philosophy instead.
Your one track mind at work.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-14 19:08:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
I'm just pointing out the fact.
Why do you insist on including factors that have nothing to do with
the issue?
Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are all irrelevant.
False. I'm right on the point.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
It has everything to do with the absolute stupidity of the doctors of
philosophy instead.
Your one track mind at work.
I'm glad you can't disagree.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-14 21:12:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
I'm just pointing out the fact.
Why do you insist on including factors that have nothing to do with
the issue?
Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are all irrelevant.
False. I'm right on the point.
That's your story and you are sticking to it.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
It has everything to do with the absolute stupidity of the doctors of
philosophy instead.
Your one track mind at work.
I'm glad you can't disagree.
I totally disagree.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-15 16:44:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
I'm just pointing out the fact.
Why do you insist on including factors that have nothing to do with
the issue?
Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are all irrelevant.
False. I'm right on the point.
That's your story and you are sticking to it.
You can't prove me wrong.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
It has everything to do with the absolute stupidity of the doctors of
philosophy instead.
Your one track mind at work.
I'm glad you can't disagree.
I totally disagree.
That's only empty denial.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-15 23:54:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
I'm just pointing out the fact.
Why do you insist on including factors that have nothing to do with
the issue?
Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are all irrelevant.
False. I'm right on the point.
That's your story and you are sticking to it.
You can't prove me wrong.
Do you understand what irrelevant means?

I know you have a blind spot mentally that prevents you from seeing or
understanding many things others clearly see and understand. It
obviously prevents you from ever considering any changes to any
position you ever take on anything.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
It has everything to do with the absolute stupidity of the doctors of
philosophy instead.
Your one track mind at work.
I'm glad you can't disagree.
I totally disagree.
That's only empty denial.
Your mental problem blocks you again.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-16 13:06:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
I'm just pointing out the fact.
Why do you insist on including factors that have nothing to do with
the issue?
Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are all irrelevant.
False. I'm right on the point.
That's your story and you are sticking to it.
You can't prove me wrong.
Do you understand what irrelevant means?
I know you have a blind spot mentally that prevents you from seeing or
understanding many things others clearly see and understand. It
obviously prevents you from ever considering any changes to any
position you ever take on anything.
That's actually you because you are spiritually blind.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
It has everything to do with the absolute stupidity of the doctors of
philosophy instead.
Your one track mind at work.
I'm glad you can't disagree.
I totally disagree.
That's only empty denial.
Your mental problem blocks you again.
Pure projection.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-16 15:50:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
I'm just pointing out the fact.
Why do you insist on including factors that have nothing to do with
the issue?
Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are all irrelevant.
False. I'm right on the point.
That's your story and you are sticking to it.
You can't prove me wrong.
Do you understand what irrelevant means?
I know you have a blind spot mentally that prevents you from seeing or
understanding many things others clearly see and understand. It
obviously prevents you from ever considering any changes to any
position you ever take on anything.
That's actually you because you are spiritually blind.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
It has everything to do with the absolute stupidity of the doctors of
philosophy instead.
Your one track mind at work.
I'm glad you can't disagree.
I totally disagree.
That's only empty denial.
Your mental problem blocks you again.
Pure projection.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
Every exchange with you reaches a point at which further discussion is
futile. You reach a point where you have taken a position on every
point raised and refuse to alter that position even when confronted
with irrefutable evidence that you are in error. Including your use
of terminology and your refusal to accept standard definitions for
word usage.

That point has been reached here. Further discussion is terminated.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-17 03:36:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
At one time the study of science was called natural philosophy.
That's the foolish mistake of Aristotle.
You don't need to go back that far.
He is the person who failed to understand the real philosophy of
Socrates and Plato. It is why he made such foolish mistake.
You either did not read or did not understand what I said.
I'm just pointing out the fact.
Why do you insist on including factors that have nothing to do with
the issue?
Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates are all irrelevant.
False. I'm right on the point.
That's your story and you are sticking to it.
You can't prove me wrong.
Do you understand what irrelevant means?
I know you have a blind spot mentally that prevents you from seeing or
understanding many things others clearly see and understand. It
obviously prevents you from ever considering any changes to any
position you ever take on anything.
That's actually you because you are spiritually blind.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
If you can't understand the use of an archaic and traditional term I
can offer no further explanation.
It's a tradition of foolish mistake. It represents the complete
intellectual stupidity and idiocy.
It's not a mistake. It is simply semantics. Our language has more
precision now than in the past.
It has nothing to do with language. It's just simple stupidity and total
cluelessness.
It has everything to do with language and usage.
It has everything to do with the absolute stupidity of the doctors of
philosophy instead.
Your one track mind at work.
I'm glad you can't disagree.
I totally disagree.
That's only empty denial.
Your mental problem blocks you again.
Pure projection.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
Note nothing is said about philosophy other than the word in the
title.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Some specialties have special names for this level of achievement but
they are all recognized for what they are.
Every exchange with you reaches a point at which further discussion is
futile. You reach a point where you have taken a position on every
point raised and refuse to alter that position even when confronted
with irrefutable evidence that you are in error. Including your use
of terminology and your refusal to accept standard definitions for
word usage.
That point has been reached here. Further discussion is terminated.
That's still just your blind denial.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Kevrob
2020-02-13 18:23:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
That article contains this:

[quote]

In the context of the Doctor of Philosophy and other similarly titled
degrees, the term "philosophy" does not refer to the field or academic
discipline of philosophy, but is used in a broader sense in accordance
with its original Greek meaning, which is "love of wisdom." In most of
Europe, all fields (history, philosophy, social sciences, mathematics,
and natural philosophy/sciences) other than theology, law, and medicine
(the so-called professional, vocational, or technical curriculum) were
traditionally known as philosophy, and in Germany and elsewhere in Europe
the basic faculty of liberal arts was known as the "faculty of philosophy."

[/quote]

In ancient times, what we now call "science"* was known as
"natural philosophy." The discipline grew so large that it
essentially "hived off" into its own "universe." Similarly,
academic philosophy split from theology.

To an atheist, doing theology is applying philosophy to
something imaginary. When, for example, a physicist studies
something speculative, it will eventually be disproved. If not,
it remains a possibility, and might even become part of an
accepted theory, but not "the word of ghaaawwwd!"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_philosophy

* "Philosophy" is from the Greek, while "science" comes
from Latin. The two terms were often used synonymously.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtHZn5X5bXM

https://www.etymonline.com/word/science

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2020-02-13 18:34:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kevrob
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit one way
or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the subject in
which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots who
consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
You are the only one who seems to think it has something to do with
philosophy.
Did you bother to read my reference?
The word philosophy is written in their deceptive title.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It indicates the attainment of a doctorial level degree and has
different names in different areas such as the law.
If you are really interested (which I doubt) there is an excellent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
[quote]
In the context of the Doctor of Philosophy and other similarly titled
degrees, the term "philosophy" does not refer to the field or academic
discipline of philosophy, but is used in a broader sense in accordance
with its original Greek meaning, which is "love of wisdom."
Bullshit. Wisdom is still the sole subject of philosophy.

In most of
Post by Kevrob
Europe, all fields (history, philosophy, social sciences, mathematics,
and natural philosophy/sciences) other than theology, law, and medicine
(the so-called professional, vocational, or technical curriculum) were
traditionally known as philosophy, and in Germany and elsewhere in Europe
the basic faculty of liberal arts was known as the "faculty of philosophy."
[/quote]
In ancient times, what we now call "science"* was known as
"natural philosophy." The discipline grew so large that it
essentially "hived off" into its own "universe." Similarly,
academic philosophy split from theology.
To an atheist, doing theology is applying philosophy to
something imaginary. When, for example, a physicist studies
something speculative, it will eventually be disproved. If not,
it remains a possibility, and might even become part of an
accepted theory, but not "the word of ghaaawwwd!"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_philosophy
* "Philosophy" is from the Greek, while "science" comes
from Latin. The two terms were often used synonymously.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtHZn5X5bXM
https://www.etymonline.com/word/science
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
aaa
2020-02-14 01:05:48 UTC
Permalink
[snip]
Post by aaa
Post by Kevrob
Post by Attila
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy
[quote]
In the context of the Doctor of Philosophy and other similarly titled
degrees, the term "philosophy" does not refer to the field or academic
discipline of philosophy, but is used in a broader sense in accordance
with its original Greek meaning, which is "love of wisdom."
[/quote]
Post by aaa
Bullshit. Wisdom is still the sole subject of philosophy.
You don't know what you are talking about, or, you are
just a lying Poe. STFU, troll.
Sometimes one wishes the bus hit you just a little bit
harder, so your fingers couldn't type this drivel.
Too bad you have nothing to say about my simple point.
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-14 19:53:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Bullshit. Wisdom is still the sole subject of philosophy.
Redefining words in order to have them mean what you want doesn't work.

Try conforming to standard definitions and you won't seem so stupid.

But I believe that is your goal. It was funny for a minute. Now it's just boring since everyone knows you're a Poe and a liar.
aaa
2020-02-15 16:49:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Bullshit. Wisdom is still the sole subject of philosophy.
Redefining words in order to have them mean what you want doesn't work.
Your lack of understanding doesn't mean I have redefined any words.
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Try conforming to standard definitions and you won't seem so stupid.
But I believe that is your goal. It was funny for a minute. Now it's
just boring since everyone knows you're a Poe and a liar.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-16 22:47:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Your lack of understanding doesn't mean I have redefined any words.
It's not lack of my understanding, but yours.
You use words in ways that do not make sense and which you define in ways not found in the dictionary.

Standard definitions are how we know what we are talking about.

You talk about nothing and call it something.

Your head is firmly lodged up your ass.
aaa
2020-02-17 14:38:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Your lack of understanding doesn't mean I have redefined any
words.
It's not lack of my understanding, but yours. You use words in ways
that do not make sense and which you define in ways not found in the
dictionary.
Standard definitions are how we know what we are talking about.
You talk about nothing and call it something.
Your head is firmly lodged up your ass.
You should have thanked me for showing the deeper meaning that is beyond
the definition of the words. Unfortunately, your lack of understanding
is keeping you from realizing that.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-17 19:33:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
You should have thanked me for showing the deeper meaning that is beyond
the definition of the words. Unfortunately, your lack of understanding
is keeping you from realizing that.

You haven't shown anything other than your ignorance.
You don't post anything worthwhile or even true.
Nothing you have ever posted is true. You just make things up, throw them into the word salad and toss.

You think there is such a thing as communications without understanding. If you use words in ways that nobody else does, nobody will be able to understand you. You just look foolish.

It's your lack of understanding that's the problem. You don't understand that meanings must be understood. You must know what you're talking about.
You don't know the bible, you don't know the SLOT, you don't know anything about anything because you've never read anything about anything.
aaa
2020-02-18 13:42:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
You should have thanked me for showing the deeper meaning that is beyond
the definition of the words. Unfortunately, your lack of
understanding is keeping you from realizing that.
You haven't shown anything other than your ignorance. You don't post
anything worthwhile or even true. Nothing you have ever posted is
true. You just make things up, throw them into the word salad and
toss.
You think there is such a thing as communications without
understanding. If you use words in ways that nobody else does,
nobody will be able to understand you. You just look foolish.
It's your lack of understanding that's the problem. You don't
understand that meanings must be understood. You must know what
you're talking about. You don't know the bible, you don't know the
SLOT, you don't know anything about anything because you've never
read anything about anything.
You only prove your own lack of understanding again and again.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-12 18:43:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or
worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit
one way or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the
subject in which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots
who consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
Did Jesus teach you to talk that way?
aaa
2020-02-12 19:41:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or
worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
In that case, all doctors of philosophy are going to be dipshit
one way or another.
That is a traditional title and has nothing to do with the
subject in which the degree is earned.
IOW, no one knows what the fuck it means. So much for the idiots
who consider themselves educated.
Of course everyone knows what it means. It means the person has
reached a particular level in their education and that level is
recognized by the establishment involved the specialty.
Unfortunately, the person knows nothing about philosophy while
pretending to be a doctor of philosophy.
It's a title and everyone but you knows it has nothing to do with
philosophy. It is a archaic holdover from much earlier in education
history.
It's a fucking lie. That is what it is.
Did Jesus teach you to talk that way?
It's just simple logical conclusion.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
d***@cox.net
2020-02-11 22:13:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
Speculation is reasoned.
the dukester, American-American
Attila
2020-02-12 01:17:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
One is real while the other is speculation.
Speculation is reasoned.
Irrelevant. Reason is important and has it's place but sooner or
later some actual unambiguous, unrelated and verifiable evidence is
needed. Philosophy has none of that.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
ravn
2020-02-11 21:09:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy
is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about, but w/o science.
aaa
2020-02-11 21:33:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?

It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
ravn
2020-02-11 21:52:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
So, you're not only cutting yourself off from science. You're cutting yourself off from reason. You're sinking into delusion.
aaa
2020-02-12 17:15:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always
been the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
So, you're not only cutting yourself off from science. You're cutting
yourself off from reason. You're sinking into delusion.
That's just your ignorant opinion.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
ravn
2020-02-12 21:09:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always
been the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
So, you're not only cutting yourself off from science. You're cutting
yourself off from reason. You're sinking into delusion.
That's just your ignorant opinion.
You claim science is inferior to philosophy. If your philosophy is cut off from real information then one has to question its soundness.
aaa
2020-02-13 15:41:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has
always been the ruler and the dictator of the inferior
science.
So, you're not only cutting yourself off from science. You're
cutting yourself off from reason. You're sinking into delusion.
That's just your ignorant opinion.
You claim science is inferior to philosophy. If your philosophy is
cut off from real information then one has to question its
soundness.
Philosophy determines your supposed real information. It doesn't rely on
it. You are still looking at philosophy backward.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
ravn
2020-02-14 22:04:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
You claim science is inferior to philosophy. If your philosophy is
cut off from real information then one has to question its
soundness.
Philosophy determines your supposed real information. It doesn't rely on
it. You are still looking at philosophy backward.
You're dealing with the world backwards. You would have it that ideas determine the world. It's the other way around. For instance, you would have it that qualities are evidence of god's existence. The qualities you refer to are what you abstract from the world. That's where you find "truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence, happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself." You want to pretend you find these beyond all given circumstances & call that god. On what real grounds can you make that presumption?
Kevrob
2020-02-15 09:28:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
You claim science is inferior to philosophy. If your philosophy is
cut off from real information then one has to question its
soundness.
Philosophy determines your supposed real information. It doesn't rely on
it. You are still looking at philosophy backward.
You're dealing with the world backwards. You would have it that ideas determine the world. It's the other way around. For instance, you would have it that qualities are evidence of god's existence. The qualities you refer to are what you abstract from the world. That's where you find "truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence, happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself." You want to pretend you find these beyond all given circumstances & call that god. On what real grounds can you make that presumption?
He has latched onto Platonic idealism or Eastern equivalents
and is just parroting buzzwords about it. He wouldn't know
an "ideal form" from a Hasbro Pla-Doh Fun Factory.

--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
aaa
2020-02-15 16:52:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
You claim science is inferior to philosophy. If your philosophy
is cut off from real information then one has to question its
soundness.
Philosophy determines your supposed real information. It doesn't
rely on it. You are still looking at philosophy backward.
You're dealing with the world backwards. You would have it that ideas
determine the world. It's the other way around. For instance, you
would have it that qualities are evidence of god's existence. The
qualities you refer to are what you abstract from the world. That's
where you find "truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge,
consciousness, intelligence, happiness, faith, courage, justice,
peace, freedom, and life itself." You want to pretend you find these
beyond all given circumstances & call that god. On what real grounds
can you make that presumption?
That is Aristotle's mistake. The teaching of Socrates and Plato shows
the exact opposite.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-11 21:55:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?

Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-12 17:14:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-12 18:04:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.

I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-12 19:39:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-12 20:25:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.

Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.

I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-13 15:38:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-13 20:21:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.

I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-14 01:18:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-14 02:00:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Another standard response.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
Attila
2020-02-14 18:17:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Another standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
I have proven you wrong many times but you never admit it.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-14 19:09:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Another standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
I have proven you wrong many times but you never admit it.
That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-14 21:13:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Another standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
I have proven you wrong many times but you never admit it.
That's just your empty claim.
Another standard meaningless response.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-15 16:53:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Another standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
I have proven you wrong many times but you never admit it.
That's just your empty claim.
Another standard meaningless response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-15 23:57:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
Your mental problems kick in again.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Another standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
I have proven you wrong many times but you never admit it.
That's just your empty claim.
Another standard meaningless response.
Just pointing out the fact.
No, you have run out of actual responses and now jut give your
standard replies.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-16 13:12:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
Your mental problems kick in again.
Pure projection.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Another standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
I have proven you wrong many times but you never admit it.
That's just your empty claim.
Another standard meaningless response.
Just pointing out the fact.
No, you have run out of actual responses and now jut give your
standard replies.
There is nothing wrong to point out your standard problem with standard
reply.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Attila
2020-02-16 15:50:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
Your mental problems kick in again.
Pure projection.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Another standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
I have proven you wrong many times but you never admit it.
That's just your empty claim.
Another standard meaningless response.
Just pointing out the fact.
No, you have run out of actual responses and now jut give your
standard replies.
There is nothing wrong to point out your standard problem with standard
reply.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Every exchange with you reaches a point at which further discussion is
futile. You reach a point where you have taken a position on every
point raised and refuse to alter that position even when confronted
with irrefutable evidence that you are in error. Including your use
of terminology and your refusal to accept standard definitions for
word usage.

That point has been reached here. Further discussion is terminated.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-17 03:36:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
Your mental problems kick in again.
Pure projection.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that everyone
else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist your usage is
correct and the standard definition is wrong. When you are confronted
with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and you have nowhere else
to turn you simply respond with "Blind Denial" or some variation of
this and keep repeating it over and over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything and I
have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong. That's just your empty claim.
Another standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
I have proven you wrong many times but you never admit it.
That's just your empty claim.
Another standard meaningless response.
Just pointing out the fact.
No, you have run out of actual responses and now jut give your
standard replies.
There is nothing wrong to point out your standard problem with standard
reply.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
I personally have been wrong many times just as everyone else has
except apparently you.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
It's no divorce. There was never a marriage. Philosophy has always been
the ruler and the dictator of the inferior science.
Only in your twisted mind.
That only shows your ignorance.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Every exchange with you reaches a point at which further discussion is
futile.
There is no real discussion with the spiritual blind and the
philosophical ignorant.

You reach a point where you have taken a position on every
Post by Attila
point raised and refuse to alter that position even when confronted
with irrefutable evidence that you are in error. Including your use
of terminology and your refusal to accept standard definitions for
word usage.
That point has been reached here. Further discussion is terminated.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
d***@cox.net
2020-02-16 16:56:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
That's blowhard attila for you.
the dukester, American-American
Attila
2020-02-16 19:33:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
That's blowhard attila for you.
You also have no clue as to what you are talking about. Or do you
also think every Doctor of Philosophy degree should reflect a through
education in philosophy?
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
d***@cox.net
2020-02-17 23:11:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
That's blowhard attila for you.
You also have no clue as to what you are talking about. Or do you
also think every Doctor of Philosophy degree should reflect a through
education in philosophy?
You have no education.
the dukester, American-American
Attila
2020-02-17 23:41:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with you or not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
That's blowhard attila for you.
You also have no clue as to what you are talking about. Or do you
also think every Doctor of Philosophy degree should reflect a through
education in philosophy?
You have no education.
Enough to work for an international high-tech company for over 30
years. I did not get my doctorate, true, but after six years of
college I was ready for a break.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
Siri Cruise
2020-02-18 12:21:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
You have no education.
I had a relative in the USAF. One of things they did was take
footprints of everyone that went in flight. The USAF figured that
in case of crash or shoot down, their boots were tough enough
that their only remains might be the feet in the boots.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
Attila
2020-02-18 12:32:23 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:21:31 -0800, Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by d***@cox.net
You have no education.
I had a relative in the USAF. One of things they did was take
footprints of everyone that went in flight. The USAF figured that
in case of crash or shoot down, their boots were tough enough
that their only remains might be the feet in the boots.
Since there is a DNA database of all military personnel that would not
be necessary. Any relatively undamaged tissue sample would suffice.
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

There are three despicable occupations:
Pimps
Politicians
Priests

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
aaa
2020-02-17 03:33:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from the
structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims about,
but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy. What
kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an education
of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be unable
to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in the
past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to understand
this.
That's just your empty claim.
Standard response.
Just pointing out the fact.
Your "fact" is wrong and I have proven this.
No, you have not.
To you, no. To everyone else, yes.
You haven't proved or disprove anything. You have only made empty claims.
That's blowhard attila for you.
I guess he just wants to show his stubbornness in his own ignorance.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester, American-American
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-14 02:38:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or
worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and
philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off
from the structure of the world, something you're trying to
make claims about, but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue
about philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of
philosophy. What kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly
everything and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an
education of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of
philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be
unable to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in
the past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully
obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to
understand this.
That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that
everyone else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist
your usage is correct and the standard definition is wrong. When
you are confronted with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and
you have nowhere else to turn you simply respond with "Blind
Denial" or some variation of this and keep repeating it over and
over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything
and I have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious
answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong.
Everyone here has proven you wrong.

As winter sports go, quite entertaining.....;)



"There will be nothing abstract in philosophy
and in the teaching of Plato. It all thanks to
Jesus, and it's all based on following Jesus."
"aaa", Oct 17 2019
https://tinyurl.com/y5rrqg5r
aaa
2020-02-14 17:55:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or
worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and
philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off
from the structure of the world, something you're trying to
make claims about, but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue
about philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of
philosophy. What kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly
everything and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an
education of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of
philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be
unable to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in
the past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully
obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to
understand this.
That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in futility.
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that
everyone else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist
your usage is correct and the standard definition is wrong. When
you are confronted with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and
you have nowhere else to turn you simply respond with "Blind
Denial" or some variation of this and keep repeating it over and
over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything
and I have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious
answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong.
Everyone here has proven you wrong.
As winter sports go, quite entertaining.....;)
That's another empty claim.
Post by Mitchell Holman
"There will be nothing abstract in philosophy
and in the teaching of Plato. It all thanks to
Jesus, and it's all based on following Jesus."
"aaa", Oct 17 2019
https://tinyurl.com/y5rrqg5r
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-15 02:42:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or
worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and
philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off
from the structure of the world, something you're trying to
make claims about, but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue
about philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of
philosophy. What kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly
everything and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an
education of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of
philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be
unable to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point in
the past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully
obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take a
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to
understand this.
That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in
futility.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that
everyone else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist
your usage is correct and the standard definition is wrong. When
you are confronted with unassailable facts that prove you wrong and
you have nowhere else to turn you simply respond with "Blind
Denial" or some variation of this and keep repeating it over and
over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything
and I have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious
answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as others
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong.
Everyone here has proven you wrong.
As winter sports go, quite entertaining.....;)
That's another empty claim.
Just explain how Plato could have
been influenced by Jesus
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
"There will be nothing abstract in philosophy
and in the teaching of Plato. It all thanks to
Jesus, and it's all based on following Jesus."
"aaa", Oct 17 2019
https://tinyurl.com/y5rrqg5r
aaa
2020-02-15 16:54:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 6:18:32 AM UTC-8, aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or
worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off
from the structure of the world, something you're trying to
make claims about, but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue
about philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of
philosophy. What kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly
everything and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an
education of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of
philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be
unable to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point
in
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
the past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully
obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take
a
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to
understand this.
That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in
futility.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that
everyone else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist
your usage is correct and the standard definition is wrong. When
you are confronted with unassailable facts that prove you wrong
and
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
you have nowhere else to turn you simply respond with "Blind
Denial" or some variation of this and keep repeating it over and
over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything
and I have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious
answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as
others
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong.
Everyone here has proven you wrong.
As winter sports go, quite entertaining.....;)
That's another empty claim.
Just explain how Plato could have
been influenced by Jesus
I never said such thing.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
"There will be nothing abstract in philosophy
and in the teaching of Plato. It all thanks to
Jesus, and it's all based on following Jesus."
"aaa", Oct 17 2019
https://tinyurl.com/y5rrqg5r
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-15 19:14:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 6:18:32 AM UTC-8, aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand
philosophy.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or
worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off
from the structure of the world, something you're trying to
make claims about, but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue
about philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of
philosophy. What kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly
everything and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an
education of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of
philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to be
unable to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point
in
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
the past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is painfully
obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you take
a
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to
understand this.
That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in
futility.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and in
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that
everyone else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist
your usage is correct and the standard definition is wrong.
When
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
you are confronted with unassailable facts that prove you wrong
and
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
you have nowhere else to turn you simply respond with "Blind
Denial" or some variation of this and keep repeating it over and
over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything
and I have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious
answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as
others
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong.
Everyone here has proven you wrong.
As winter sports go, quite entertaining.....;)
That's another empty claim.
Just explain how Plato could have
been influenced by Jesus
I never said such thing.
The teaching of Plato...is all based on following Jesus."
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
"There will be nothing abstract in philosophy
and in the teaching of Plato. It all thanks to
Jesus, and it's all based on following Jesus."
"aaa", Oct 17 2019
https://tinyurl.com/y5rrqg5r
%
2020-02-15 19:17:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
in
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 6:18:32 AM UTC-8, aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand
philosophy.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry.
Or
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and
philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy
off
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
from the structure of the world, something you're trying
to
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
make claims about, but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue
about philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors
of
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
philosophy. What kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly
everything and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an
education of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of
philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to
be
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
unable to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point
in
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
the past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is
painfully
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you
take
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
a
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to
understand this.
That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in
futility.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and
in
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that
everyone else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist
your usage is correct and the standard definition is wrong.
When
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
you are confronted with unassailable facts that prove you wrong
and
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
you have nowhere else to turn you simply respond with "Blind
Denial" or some variation of this and keep repeating it over and
over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything
and I have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious
answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as
others
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong.
Everyone here has proven you wrong.
As winter sports go, quite entertaining.....;)
That's another empty claim.
Just explain how Plato could have
been influenced by Jesus
I never said such thing.
The teaching of Plato...is all based on following Jesus."
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
"There will be nothing abstract in philosophy
and in the teaching of Plato. It all thanks to
Jesus, and it's all based on following Jesus."
"aaa", Oct 17 2019
https://tinyurl.com/y5rrqg5r
so is your momma
aaa
2020-02-16 00:12:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
in
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 6:18:32 AM UTC-8, aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand
philosophy.
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry.
Or
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
worst, deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and
philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy
off
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
from the structure of the world, something you're trying
to
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
make claims about, but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue
about philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors
of
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
philosophy. What kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly
everything and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an
education of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of
philosophy are fucking liars.
It is amazing how you get something in your mind and seem to
be
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
unable to alter it in any way at all under any conditions.
I understand fro comments you had a brain injury at some point
in
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
the past. don't ever bother trying to hide it - it is
painfully
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
obvious.
Too bad you can't disagree with my simple logic.
Agreeing with your nor not agreeing is irrelevant. Once you
take
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
a
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
position that position is unyielding.
Why is that a problem to you?
You seldom get it right at first pass but you are unable to
understand this.
That's just your empty claim.
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Trying to discuss anything with you is a demonstration in
futility.
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
You take buzz words you have heard and use them incorrectly and
in
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
ways at odds with the standard definitions of the words that
everyone else uses. When this is pointed out to you you insist
your usage is correct and the standard definition is wrong.
When
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
you are confronted with unassailable facts that prove you wrong
and
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
you have nowhere else to turn you simply respond with "Blind
Denial" or some variation of this and keep repeating it over and
over.
I have directly asked you twice if you ever wrong about anything
and I have yet to get an answer. I suspect I know the obvious
answer.
I don't have to answer a hypothetical question.
It isn't hypothetical. I have proven you wrong many times, as
others
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
have done, yet you never alter your origional position.
No, you haven't proved me wrong.
Everyone here has proven you wrong.
As winter sports go, quite entertaining.....;)
That's another empty claim.
Just explain how Plato could have
been influenced by Jesus
I never said such thing.
The teaching of Plato...is all based on following Jesus."
That's your own misinterpretation.
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
"There will be nothing abstract in philosophy
and in the teaching of Plato. It all thanks to
Jesus, and it's all based on following Jesus."
"aaa", Oct 17 2019
https://tinyurl.com/y5rrqg5r
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-12 18:42:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from
the structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims
about, but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy.
What kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an
education of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy
are fucking liars.
If only they learned philosophy the way
you did - by not learning it at all.





"I never bothered to read philosophy."
"aaa", April 23, 2017
http://tinyurl.com/l2gt9ku
aaa
2020-02-12 19:40:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Attila
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
He is blinded by science and can't understand philosophy.
Your application of philosophy is misguided sophistry. Or worst,
deliberate sophistry.
I have shown clear distinction between science and philosophy.
Divorcing science from philosophy is cutting philosophy off from
the structure of the world, something you're trying to make claims
about, but w/o science.
Unfortunately, stupid scientists who have no fucking clue about
philosophy never hesitate to call themselves doctors of philosophy.
What kind of shameless idiocy is that?
The kind described by your abysmal ignorance about nearly everything
and your refusal to bother learning anything new?
Apparently your education stopped at about the third year.
If education makes you claim something you never are, it's an
education of lying and deceit. Therefore, all doctors of philosophy
are fucking liars.
If only they learned philosophy the way
you did - by not learning it at all.
Wrong. I learned philosophy from Jesus.
Post by Mitchell Holman
"I never bothered to read philosophy."
"aaa", April 23, 2017
http://tinyurl.com/l2gt9ku
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
ravn
2020-02-08 00:32:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point. Science is the systematic study of the structure & behavior of what objectively exists. Is your study of god systematic, & objective, or not? If you claim idealism, wouldn't it be objective idealism or not? No, instead you're taking a space cadet approach to things. All you know is the mind. All that exists is the mind. But whose mind? Or minds? If you can't get passed just yours, then you've slipped into solipsism.
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
If humans hadn't figured out the world, to whatever extent that they
could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they wouldn't
have survived as a species. So, there is no before "science".
Philosophy is before science.
Science comes out of practical activity with the world. People speculated about things from the beginning. So, how can you justify your claim here?
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead to
theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If your
so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical affairs,
it's useless.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
That's the problem. You divorced theory from practice. You want to say theory came first. But theories & speculations arise out of interactions with the world.
aaa
2020-02-08 15:11:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point.
That's actually you. Life is not studied by science. This is a basic
fact you need to recognize.


Science is the systematic study of the
Post by ravn
structure & behavior of what objectively exists. Is your study of god
systematic, & objective, or not? If you claim idealism, wouldn't it
be objective idealism or not? No, instead you're taking a space
cadet approach to things. All you know is the mind. All that exists
is the mind. But whose mind? Or minds? If you can't get passed just
yours, then you've slipped into solipsism.
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
If humans hadn't figured out the world, to whatever extent that
they could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they
wouldn't have survived as a species. So, there is no before
"science".
Philosophy is before science.
Science comes out of practical activity with the world. People
speculated about things from the beginning. So, how can you justify
your claim here?
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead
to theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If
your so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical
affairs, it's useless.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
That's the problem. You divorced theory from practice. You want to
say theory came first. But theories & speculations arise out of
interactions with the world.
That's your misunderstanding. I said philosophy is before science.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Michael Christ
2020-02-08 22:50:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point.
That's actually you. Life is not studied by science.
True. Science is studying what is dying and you can't know life by the
study of what is dying.
This is a basic
Post by aaa
fact you need to recognize.
True, he certainly does.






Michael Christ
Post by aaa
 Science is the systematic study of the
Post by ravn
structure & behavior of what objectively exists. Is your study of god
systematic, & objective,  or not? If you claim idealism, wouldn't it
be objective idealism or not?   No, instead you're taking a space
cadet approach to things. All you know is the mind. All that exists
is the mind. But whose mind? Or minds? If you can't get passed just
yours, then you've slipped into solipsism.
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
If humans hadn't figured out  the world, to whatever extent that
they could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they
wouldn't have survived as a species. So, there is no before
"science".
Philosophy is before science.
Science comes out of practical activity with the world. People
speculated about things from the beginning. So, how can you justify
your claim here?
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead
to theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If
your so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical
affairs, it's useless.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
That's the problem. You divorced theory from practice. You want to
say theory came first. But theories & speculations arise out of
interactions with the world.
That's your misunderstanding. I said philosophy is before science.
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
aaa
2020-02-09 14:20:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point.
That's actually you. Life is not studied by science.
True.  Science is studying what is dying and you can't know life by the
study of what is dying.
Yes. Evolution is evidence of the ignorance of the scientists.
This is a basic
Post by aaa
fact you need to recognize.
True, he certainly does.
Michael Christ
Post by aaa
  Science is the systematic study of the
Post by ravn
structure & behavior of what objectively exists. Is your study of god
systematic, & objective,  or not? If you claim idealism, wouldn't it
be objective idealism or not?   No, instead you're taking a space
cadet approach to things. All you know is the mind. All that exists
is the mind. But whose mind? Or minds? If you can't get passed just
yours, then you've slipped into solipsism.
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
If humans hadn't figured out  the world, to whatever extent that
they could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they
wouldn't have survived as a species. So, there is no before
"science".
Philosophy is before science.
Science comes out of practical activity with the world. People
speculated about things from the beginning. So, how can you justify
your claim here?
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead
to theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If
your so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical
affairs, it's useless.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
That's the problem. You divorced theory from practice. You want to
say theory came first. But theories & speculations arise out of
interactions with the world.
That's your misunderstanding. I said philosophy is before science.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-09 14:42:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point.
That's actually you. Life is not studied by science.
True.  Science is studying what is dying and you can't know life by
the study of what is dying.
Yes. Evolution is evidence of the ignorance of the scientists.
Scientists should listen to you because you
know more they do.




"I have understood evolution without reading
a single sentence from any book or article
about evolution."
"aaa", Feb 15 2017
http://tinyurl.com/jfn64g4
aaa
2020-02-09 18:18:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point.
That's actually you. Life is not studied by science.
True.  Science is studying what is dying and you can't know life by
the study of what is dying.
Yes. Evolution is evidence of the ignorance of the scientists.
Scientists should listen to you because you
know more they do.
That is actually quite right. Scientists have absolutely no
understanding of life because there can be no scientific understanding
of the life that is not even physical. It's the same as studying a ghost
which is exactly what evolution is pretending to do.
Post by Mitchell Holman
"I have understood evolution without reading
a single sentence from any book or article
about evolution."
"aaa", Feb 15 2017
http://tinyurl.com/jfn64g4
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Mitchell Holman
2020-02-09 18:41:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point.
That's actually you. Life is not studied by science.
True.  Science is studying what is dying and you can't know life
by
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
the study of what is dying.
Yes. Evolution is evidence of the ignorance of the scientists.
Scientists should listen to you because you
know more they do.
That is actually quite right. Scientists have absolutely no
understanding of life because there can be no scientific understanding
of the life that is not even physical. It's the same as studying a ghost
which is exactly what evolution is pretending to do.
Have you addressed a meeting of evolutionary
biologists, telling them how wrong all of them
are and how you "just know" the TRUTH about
evolution?
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
"I have understood evolution without reading
a single sentence from any book or article
about evolution."
"aaa", Feb 15 2017
http://tinyurl.com/jfn64g4
aaa
2020-02-09 18:45:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point.
That's actually you. Life is not studied by science.
True.  Science is studying what is dying and you can't know life
by
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
the study of what is dying.
Yes. Evolution is evidence of the ignorance of the scientists.
Scientists should listen to you because you
know more they do.
That is actually quite right. Scientists have absolutely no
understanding of life because there can be no scientific understanding
of the life that is not even physical. It's the same as studying a
ghost
Post by aaa
which is exactly what evolution is pretending to do.
Have you addressed a meeting of evolutionary
biologists, telling them how wrong all of them
are and how you "just know" the TRUTH about
evolution?
I have proven evolution wrong both scientifically and philosophically
for too many times.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by Mitchell Holman
"I have understood evolution without reading
a single sentence from any book or article
about evolution."
"aaa", Feb 15 2017
http://tinyurl.com/jfn64g4
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-09 22:02:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
I have proven evolution wrong both scientifically and philosophically
for too many times.

Even if that were true, there's little chance that any evolutionary biologists have read your words on the subject.

Maybe just drop them a line via snail mail so they could study your rock solid explanation of why you're right and they're wrong.

It would be very helpful to the 98% of biologists who think that evolution is a proven fact.
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-09 22:06:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
You can't pull down the truth, Gertrude, no matter how hard you try.
Why do you keep trying?
Post by Michael Christ
Everything is dead, just like the Lord said. Lasting life has been
severed from us just like the broken off tree branch and you are just
watching it pass into dust...like your life.

I guess that means you're dead too. You are part of everything. Especially the part that is made entirely of bullshit.
Post by Michael Christ
Don't bother having yourself cremated it is a waste of time, you won't
escape your Creator. We are more than just physical passing away
beings. We are spirit beings and all our cells have been replaced a
number of times and yet we remain, our personalities, our ways, our true
substance.

No such thing as spirit beings.
Post by Michael Christ
A reckoning is inevitable and a special reward for those who wipe their
ass on the truth.

Yep, you're going to be very aware of it because you're a heretic and a liar.

You are brain dead when it comes to truth, reality, or religion. You just make it up. You should work for a political party.

Everyone knows that the FSM is the true God of the universe. He has the perfect message for all mankind.
He doesn't lie and he doesn't play favorites with our lives. He understands that there is no such thing as "fallen man" because he never considered being that vengeful over a bite of fruit.

FSM wants us all to be happy and not treat those who are nonbelievers as evil. They're just not very bright and very confused.

Life is for living and mistakes are part of life.
Those who don't believe are missing out on one helluva After life.

Let them be. They will never experience the pure joy of being touched by his Noodly appendages. They have rejected Him and His message of truth and joy for all.

He doesn't try and scare people with tales of eternal pain and suffering for the smallest of crimes, most of which wouldn't be crimes to a sane person.

FSM doesn't care if you believe or not. Its your loss if you reject him.
He's the master of the universe and has no need for us to pretend to love and adore him. He knows nothing can harm him and no lie can ever disprove his existence.

He leaves you alone to figure things out by yourself.
If you aren't smart enough to understand his message, then he wouldn't want you boring him throughout eternity.

He never says anything made itself. He knows that all He had to do was just set things up so nature and the law of cause and effect could take effect over billions of years.

Www.venganza.org

Believe.

Ramen.

Say be upon you.
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-09 22:08:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Christ
You can't pull down the truth, Gertrude, no matter how hard you try.
Why do you keep trying?
Post by Michael Christ
Everything is dead, just like the Lord said. Lasting life has been
severed from us just like the broken off tree branch and you are just
watching it pass into dust...like your life.

I guess that means you're dead too. You are part of everything. Especially the part that is made entirely of bullshit.
Post by Michael Christ
Don't bother having yourself cremated it is a waste of time, you won't
escape your Creator. We are more than just physical passing away
beings. We are spirit beings and all our cells have been replaced a
number of times and yet we remain, our personalities, our ways, our true
substance.

No such thing as spirit beings.
Post by Michael Christ
A reckoning is inevitable and a special reward for those who wipe their
ass on the truth.

Yep, you're going to be very aware of it because you're a heretic and a liar.

You are brain dead when it comes to truth, reality, or religion. You just make it up. You should work for a political party.

Everyone knows that the FSM is the true God of the universe. He has the perfect message for all mankind.
He doesn't lie and he doesn't play favorites with our lives. He understands that there is no such thing as "fallen man" because he never considered being that vengeful over a bite of fruit.

FSM wants us all to be happy and not treat those who are nonbelievers as evil. They're just not very bright and very confused.

Life is for living and mistakes are part of life.
Those who don't believe are missing out on one helluva After life.

Let them be. They will never experience the pure joy of being touched by his Noodly appendages. They have rejected Him and His message of truth and joy for all.

He doesn't try and scare people with tales of eternal pain and suffering for the smallest of crimes, most of which wouldn't be crimes to a sane person.

FSM doesn't care if you believe or not. Its your loss if you reject him.
He's the master of the universe and has no need for us to pretend to love and adore him. He knows nothing can harm him and no lie can ever disprove his existence.

He leaves you alone to figure things out by yourself.
If you aren't smart enough to understand his message, then he wouldn't want you boring him throughout eternity.

He never says anything made itself. He knows that all He had to do was just set things up so nature and the law of cause and effect could take effect over billions of years.

Www.venganza.org

Believe.

Ramen.

Sauce be upon you.
aaa
2020-02-10 16:10:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
I have proven evolution wrong both scientifically and
philosophically
for too many times.
Even if that were true, there's little chance that any evolutionary
biologists have read your words on the subject.
Maybe just drop them a line via snail mail so they could study your
rock solid explanation of why you're right and they're wrong.
It would be very helpful to the 98% of biologists who think that
evolution is a proven fact.
Their ignorance isn't my problem.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Cloud Hobbit
2020-02-13 00:36:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Maybe just drop them a line via snail mail so they could study your
rock solid explanation of why you're right and they're wrong.
It would be very helpful to the 98% of biologists who think that
evolution is a proven fact.
Their ignorance isn't my problem.
So much for love they neighbor.🐴💩
aaa
2020-02-13 15:36:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Post by aaa
Post by Cloud Hobbit
Maybe just drop them a line via snail mail so they could study your
rock solid explanation of why you're right and they're wrong.
It would be very helpful to the 98% of biologists who think that
evolution is a proven fact.
Their ignorance isn't my problem.
So much for love they neighbor.🐴💩
Yes. It's called tough love.
--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.

Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
Michael Christ
2020-02-09 20:55:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point.
That's actually you. Life is not studied by science.
True.  Science is studying what is dying and you can't know life by
the study of what is dying.
Yes. Evolution is evidence of the ignorance of the scientists.
Scientists should listen to you because you
know more they do.
He does.

You need to pay attention, Mitch.





Michael Christ
Post by Mitchell Holman
"I have understood evolution without reading
a single sentence from any book or article
about evolution."
"aaa", Feb 15 2017
http://tinyurl.com/jfn64g4
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Michael Christ
2020-02-09 20:52:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by aaa
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Post by aaa
Life is not of the world. The world that science studies is the lifeless.
You're missing the point.
That's actually you. Life is not studied by science.
True.  Science is studying what is dying and you can't know life by
the study of what is dying.
Yes. Evolution is evidence of the ignorance of the scientists.
Completely the opposite direction! How revelatory and how ironic!








Michael Christ
Post by aaa
 >
This is a basic
Post by aaa
fact you need to recognize.
True, he certainly does.
Michael Christ
Post by aaa
  Science is the systematic study of the
Post by ravn
structure & behavior of what objectively exists. Is your study of god
systematic, & objective,  or not? If you claim idealism, wouldn't it
be objective idealism or not?   No, instead you're taking a space
cadet approach to things. All you know is the mind. All that exists
is the mind. But whose mind? Or minds? If you can't get passed just
yours, then you've slipped into solipsism.
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
If humans hadn't figured out  the world, to whatever extent that
they could under the circumstances they found themselves in, they
wouldn't have survived as a species. So, there is no before
"science".
Philosophy is before science.
Science comes out of practical activity with the world. People
speculated about things from the beginning. So, how can you justify
your claim here?
Post by aaa
Post by ravn
Practical activities are unavoidable. Practice is going to lead
to theories. Theories are going to lead to more practice. If
your so-called philosophy doesn't have any concern over practical
affairs, it's useless.
That has nothing to do with what I said.
That's the problem. You divorced theory from practice. You want to
say theory came first. But theories & speculations arise out of
interactions with the world.
That's your misunderstanding. I said philosophy is before science.
--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Ted
2020-02-05 07:47:36 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:42:27 +1100, Michael Christ
news:r1a1ni$7qs
What exactly can't I see?
Facts. Reality. Common sense.
:-).
The stock standard atheist 'air' answer! :-).
It's better than the standard "You just
have to have faith" Christian answer.......
You have to have faith in something, that is the way we were
created. I
have faith in a Creator God who purposely created with the laws of
life
everything we know and you have faith in 'everything just made
itself'
over a long wong wong wong time.
So where are your 'facts, reality and common sense??'
Here is mine...no thing, nothing can create itself. Got that??
Now, God is eternal or nothing would be here. Get the connection??
Now, you...
Michael Christ
God eats shit.
Loading...