Trump Sues Newspaper Over Election Interference

[Michael A Terrell]

On 12/24/2024 9:02 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <***@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> news:676ab5e8$3$1895491$***@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>>> In article <vkc2ic$19b36$***@dont-email.me>, ***@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 12/23/2024 6:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth <***@nowhere.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:vkas1g$12f7o$***@dont- email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 6:51 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 7:27 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Once again, if she knowingly published a poll with a known bad
>>>>>>>>>> methodology (as you had noted, she had the same issue in the
>>>>>>>>>> past) it's fraud.  That's what discovery is for.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So what if it is a fraud? First amendment, sunshine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dipshit was using 'fraud' with a nonlegal meaning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This would be considerred political speecch which has additional
>>>>>>> protections.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If Selzer intentionally published poll results she knew to be
>>>>>> false, I don't think she is protected by the First Amendment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When has a pollster ever been successfully
>>>>> sued for defamation?
>>>>
>>>> The lawsuit claims consumer fraud, not defamation. As far as I know,
>>>> no pollster has been successfully sued. Trump's case is frivolous for
>>>> many reasons. He is a bully, crybaby, sore loser and sore winner.
>>>
>>> He was defamed and won.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Trump spends years ranting about
>> Crooked Hillary and Pocahontas and
>> Lyin' Ted and then complains HE is
>> being defamed.
>>
>> What a crybaby.
>
> So? He was telling the truth.
He was lying, as he always does.
--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

[Skeeter]

In article <aTDaP.123535$***@fx16.iad>,
***@earthlink.nut says...
>
> On 12/24/2024 9:02 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
> of lies:
>
> > In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter <***@photonmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:676ab5e8$3$1895491$***@reader.netnews.com:
> >>
> >>> In article <vkc2ic$19b36$***@dont-email.me>, ***@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/23/2024 6:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>> Josh Rosenbluth <***@nowhere.com> wrote in
> >>>>> news:vkas1g$12f7o$***@dont- email.me:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 12/22/2024 6:51 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> >>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 7:27 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Once again, if she knowingly published a poll with a known bad
> >>>>>>>>>> methodology (as you had noted, she had the same issue in the
> >>>>>>>>>> past) it's fraud.  That's what discovery is for.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So what if it is a fraud? First amendment, sunshine.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dipshit was using 'fraud' with a nonlegal meaning.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This would be considerred political speecch which has additional
> >>>>>>> protections.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If Selzer intentionally published poll results she knew to be
> >>>>>> false, I don't think she is protected by the First Amendment.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When has a pollster ever been successfully
> >>>>> sued for defamation?
> >>>>
> >>>> The lawsuit claims consumer fraud, not defamation. As far as I know,
> >>>> no pollster has been successfully sued. Trump's case is frivolous for
> >>>> many reasons. He is a bully, crybaby, sore loser and sore winner.
> >>>
> >>> He was defamed and won.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Trump spends years ranting about
> >> Crooked Hillary and Pocahontas and
> >> Lyin' Ted and then complains HE is
> >> being defamed.
> >>
> >> What a crybaby.
> >
> > So? He was telling the truth.
> He was lying, as he always does.

All true and you cry.

[Ted]

Michael A Terrell wrote:

> On 12/24/2024 9:02 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
> do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
>
> > In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
> > says...
> > >
> >>Skeeter <***@photonmail.com> wrote in
> > > news:676ab5e8$3$1895491$***@reader.netnews.com:
> > >
> > > > In article <vkc2ic$19b36$***@dont-email.me>, ***@nowhere.com
> > > > says...
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/23/2024 6:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>Josh Rosenbluth <***@nowhere.com> wrote in
> > > > > > news:vkas1g$12f7o$***@dont- email.me:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 12/22/2024 6:51 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> > > > > > > > Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 12/22/2024 7:27 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > NoBody wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Once again, if she knowingly published a poll
> > > > > > > > > > > with a known bad methodology (as you had noted,
> > > > > > > > > > > she had the same issue in the past) it's fraud. 
> > > > > > > > > > > That's what discovery is for.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So what if it is a fraud? First amendment, sunshine.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dipshit was using 'fraud' with a nonlegal meaning.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This would be considerred political speecch which has
> > > > > > > > additional protections.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If Selzer intentionally published poll results she knew
> > > > > > > to be false, I don't think she is protected by the First
> > > > > > > Amendment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> >>>>> When has a pollster ever been successfully
> > > > > > sued for defamation?
> > > > >
> > > > > The lawsuit claims consumer fraud, not defamation. As far as
> > > > > I know, no pollster has been successfully sued. Trump's case
> > > > > is frivolous for many reasons. He is a bully, crybaby, sore
> > > > > loser and sore winner.
> > > >
> > > > He was defamed and won.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >> Trump spends years ranting about
> > > Crooked Hillary and Pocahontas and
> > > Lyin' Ted and then complains HE is
> > > being defamed.
> > >
> >> What a crybaby.
> >
> > So? He was telling the truth.
> He was lying, as he always does.

I wanna suck black ass.

[Michael A Terrell]

On 12/24/2024 3:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <vkfacq$21md8$***@dont-email.me>, ***@gmx.com says...
>>
>> On 12/24/2024 1:46 PM, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2024-12-24, Skeeter <***@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <***@185.151.15.160>, ***@aol.com
>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>> Skeeter <***@photonmail.com> wrote in news:676ae944$0$1895507
>>>>> $***@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Skeeter <***@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:676ab5e8$3$1895491$***@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <vkc2ic$19b36$***@dont-email.me>, ***@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/2024 6:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth <***@nowhere.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:vkas1g$12f7o$***@dont- email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 6:51 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 7:27 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again, if she knowingly published a poll with a known
>>>>> bad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methodology (as you had noted, she had the same issue in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past) it's fraud.  That's what discovery is for.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what if it is a fraud? First amendment, sunshine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dipshit was using 'fraud' with a nonlegal meaning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This would be considerred political speecch which has
>>>>> additional
>>>>>>>>>>>> protections.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If Selzer intentionally published poll results she knew to be
>>>>>>>>>>> false, I don't think she is protected by the First Amendment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When has a pollster ever been successfully
>>>>>>>>>> sued for defamation?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The lawsuit claims consumer fraud, not defamation. As far as I
>>>>> know,
>>>>>>>>> no pollster has been successfully sued. Trump's case is frivolous
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> many reasons. He is a bully, crybaby, sore loser and sore winner.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He was defamed and won.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trump spends years ranting about
>>>>>>> Crooked Hillary and Pocahontas and
>>>>>>> Lyin' Ted and then complains HE is
>>>>>>> being defamed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What a crybaby.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So? He was telling the truth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Like his "I never had sex with Stormy Daniels" truth?
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>> You guys are soooo gullible.........
>>>>
>>>> Like "I will never pardon Hunter".
>>>
>>> Or my uncle Boise was eaten by cannibals.
>> Biden's uncle's body was never found. He may have been eaten by cannibals. You
>> can't prove he wasn't.
>
> It was a lie.

No. At worst, it might be Biden's incorrect belief. But it's not a lie if he
sincerely believes it. In fact, it may well be true, even though Biden could
never prove it. But you — a stupid fucktard — can't disprove it.

Trump lies.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

[Rudy Canoza]

On 12/24/2024 9:54 PM, burch cassidy wrote:
> In <eFKaP.123544$***@fx16.iad> Jon Ball wrote:

No such poster, as the cocksucking faggot shitbag spammy well knows.

>>
>> On 12/24/2024 3:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <vkfacq$21md8$***@dont-email.me>, ***@gmx.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 12/24/2024 1:46 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-12-24, Skeeter <***@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <***@185.151.15.160>, ***@aol.com
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Skeeter <***@photonmail.com> wrote in news:676ae944$0$1895507
>>>>>>> $***@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <***@185.151.15.190>, ***@aol.com
>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <***@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:676ab5e8$3$1895491$***@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vkc2ic$19b36$***@dont-email.me>, ***@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/23/2024 6:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth <***@nowhere.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vkas1g$12f7o$***@dont- email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 6:51 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 7:27 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once again, if she knowingly published a poll with a known
>>>>>>> bad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methodology (as you had noted, she had the same issue in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past) it's fraud.  That's what discovery is for.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what if it is a fraud? First amendment, sunshine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dipshit was using 'fraud' with a nonlegal meaning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This would be considerred political speecch which has
>>>>>>> additional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protections.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Selzer intentionally published poll results she knew to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> false, I don't think she is protected by the First Amendment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When has a pollster ever been successfully
>>>>>>>>>>>> sued for defamation?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The lawsuit claims consumer fraud, not defamation. As far as I
>>>>>>> know,
>>>>>>>>>>> no pollster has been successfully sued. Trump's case is frivolous
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> many reasons. He is a bully, crybaby, sore loser and sore winner.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He was defamed and won.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump spends years ranting about
>>>>>>>>> Crooked Hillary and Pocahontas and
>>>>>>>>> Lyin' Ted and then complains HE is
>>>>>>>>> being defamed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a crybaby.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So? He was telling the truth.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like his "I never had sex with Stormy Daniels" truth?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You guys are soooo gullible.........
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like "I will never pardon Hunter".
>>>>>
>>>>> Or my uncle Boise was eaten by cannibals.
>>>> Biden's uncle's body was never found. He may have been eaten by cannibals. You
>>>> can't prove he wasn't.
>>>
>>> It was a lie.
>>
>> No. At worst, it might be Biden's incorrect belief. But it's not a lie if he
>> sincerely believes it. In fact, it may well be true, even though Biden could
>> never prove it. But you — a stupid fucktard — can't disprove it.
>>
>> Trump lies.
>
> That's correct.
Of course it's correct, spammy, you squat-to-piss lying Nazi faggot.

--
Every Republiscum/QAnon accusation is, in fact, a confession

[Michael A Terrell]

On 12/27/2024 10:09 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <vkmkgn$3mqvt$***@dont-email.me>, ***@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 12/27/2024 7:41 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 08:36:31 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
>>> <***@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/26/2024 6:22 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:12:47 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
>>>>> <***@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>> {snip}
>>
>>>>>> What examination would you have her do?
>>>>>
>>>>> Specific ways of verification of methodology I leave to the
>>>>> professions but again, I've answered your question already.
>>>>
>>>> There was no examination for her to do. She was right! And, that's why
>>>> your answer was absurd.
>>>
>>> And you seem to think due dilligence shouldn't be a thing. Her same
>>> methodology FAILED this year. Had she verified how she went about the
>>> previous poll she may have prevented the career ender this poll did.
>>
>> The only thing she would have found was Trump would be +6 with recall
>> weighting. And, she would have noted that had she recall weighted in
>> 2016 and 2020, she would have gotten it wrong.
>>
>> What should she have done next? That's easy: don't use recall weighting
>> and publish the poll as Harris +3.
>
> Notice: Trump won.
Insurrection, treason, rape, corruption, hate and fentanyl abuse won.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

[Ted]

Skeeter wrote:

> In article <QfCbP.91296$***@fx12.iad>,
> ***@earthlink.nut says...
> >
> > On 12/27/2024 10:09 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
> > Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
> > do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
> >
> > > In article <vkmkgn$3mqvt$***@dont-email.me>, ***@nowhere.com
> > > says...
> > > >
> > >> On 12/27/2024 7:41 AM, NoBody wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 08:36:31 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
> > >>> <***@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > >>>> On 12/26/2024 6:22 AM, NoBody wrote:
> > >>>>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:12:47 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
> > >>>>> <***@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > >> {snip}
> > > >
> > >>>>>> What examination would you have her do?
> > > > > > >
> > >>>>> Specific ways of verification of methodology I leave to the
> > >>>>> professions but again, I've answered your question already.
> > > > > >
> > >>>> There was no examination for her to do. She was right! And,
> > that's why >>>> your answer was absurd.
> > > > >
> > >>> And you seem to think due dilligence shouldn't be a thing. Her
> > same >>> methodology FAILED this year. Had she verified how she
> > went about the >>> previous poll she may have prevented the career
> > ender this poll did.
> > > >
> > >> The only thing she would have found was Trump would be +6 with
> > recall >> weighting. And, she would have noted that had she recall
> > weighted in >> 2016 and 2020, she would have gotten it wrong.
> > > >
> > >> What should she have done next? That's easy: don't use recall
> > weighting >> and publish the poll as Harris +3.
> > >
> > > Notice: Trump won.
> > Insurrection, treason, rape, corruption, hate and fentanyl abuse
> > won.
>
> No insurrection but the left is talking about it. What treason> No
> rape and no rape charges. Bidens border rule is why the Fentanyl is
> so rampant.

I wanna suck black ass.

[Jack Sovalot]

Ted wrote:

> Skeeter wrote:
>
> > In article <QfCbP.91296$***@fx12.iad>,
> > ***@earthlink.nut says...
> > >
> > > On 12/27/2024 10:09 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
> > > Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
> > > do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
> > >
> > > > In article <vkmkgn$3mqvt$***@dont-email.me>, ***@nowhere.com
> > > > says...
> > > > >
> > > >> On 12/27/2024 7:41 AM, NoBody wrote:
> > > >>> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 08:36:31 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
> > > >>> <***@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > >>>> On 12/26/2024 6:22 AM, NoBody wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:12:47 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
> > > >>>>> <***@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >> {snip}
> > > > >
> > > >>>>>> What examination would you have her do?
> > > > > > > >
> > > >>>>> Specific ways of verification of methodology I leave to the
> > > >>>>> professions but again, I've answered your question already.
> > > > > > >
> > > >>>> There was no examination for her to do. She was right! And,
> > > that's why >>>> your answer was absurd.
> > > > > >
> > > >>> And you seem to think due dilligence shouldn't be a thing.
> > > Her same >>> methodology FAILED this year. Had she verified how
> > > she went about the >>> previous poll she may have prevented the
> > > career ender this poll did.
> > > > >
> > > >> The only thing she would have found was Trump would be +6 with
> > > recall >> weighting. And, she would have noted that had she recall
> > > weighted in >> 2016 and 2020, she would have gotten it wrong.
> > > > >
> > > >> What should she have done next? That's easy: don't use recall
> > > weighting >> and publish the poll as Harris +3.
> > > >
> > > > Notice: Trump won.
> > > Insurrection, treason, rape, corruption, hate and fentanyl abuse
> > > won.
> >
> > No insurrection but the left is talking about it. What treason> No
> > rape and no rape charges. Bidens border rule is why the Fentanyl is
> > so rampant.
>
> I wanna suck black ass.

omg so do I!

[Governor Swill]

On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 19:07:02 +0000, "Jack Sovalot" <hee-***@jack.sovalot>
wrote:

>Ted wrote:
<snip>
>> I wanna suck black ass.
>
>omg so do I!

It doesn't take long to realize that reading this newsgroup isn't worth the
time.

NP: Beatles - Nothin' Shakin' (But The Leaves On The Trees)
--
Been saying since last spring, "let the voters decide."

Well, they did. Get over it.

[Peter Steele]

Governor Swill wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 19:07:02 +0000, "Jack Sovalot" <hee-***@jack.sovalot>
> wrote:
>
>> Ted wrote:
> <snip>
>>> I wanna suck black ass.
>>
>> omg so do I!
>
> It doesn't take long to realize that reading this newsgroup isn't worth the
> time.
>

Good. Fuck off and die.