Discussion:
UK Govt Caught Inventing Climate Data from 103 Non-Existent Stations to Push Net Zero Agenda
Add Reply
Andrew W
2024-12-25 12:12:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from-103-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/

A British government agency has been caught fabricating meteorological data
from more than one hundred non-existent weather stations to promote the
climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda being promoted by globalist
interests.

Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate models used
by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the United Nations and other
global organizations in shaping climate policies and driving alarmist
narratives.

Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the Met
Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations, investigator
Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302 sites supplying
temperature averages do not exist.

“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not real and
simply ‘made up’ by a Government agency,” asks Sanders.

He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent nature of existing
published climate data, “to avoid other institutions and researchers using
unreliable data and reaching erroneous conclusions”.

In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight sites
identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone, Dover and
Gillingham – which all produce rolling temperature averages to the second
decimal place of a degree – are “fiction”.

Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather station
at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in the list of Met
sites with a classification from the World Meteorological Organisation
(WMO). The Met Office directs online inquiries about Dover to the ”nearest
climate station” at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of rolling
30-year averages.

According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as the
Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any scientific
organization would site a temperature monitoring station that is likely to
be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running this station on the beach,
have accurate records been kept for 30 years and why is it not listed under
the 380 sites that are given a WMO rating?

Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office “declined to
advise me” exactly how or where the alleged ‘data’ were derived for these
103 non-existent sites.

The practice of ‘inventing’ temperature data from non-existent stations is a
controversial issue in the United States where the local weather service
NOAA has been charged with fabricating data for more than 30% of its
reporting sites.

Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting averages are
given an ‘E’ for estimate.

“The addition of the ghost station data means NOAA’s monthly and yearly
reports are not representative of reality,” says meteorologist Anthony
Watts. “If this kind of process were used in a court of law, then the
evidence would be thrown out as being polluted,” he added.

In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has demonstrated
with hard evidence that the Met Office is “clearly fabricating” data. In
addition, it is failing to meet high standards of scientific integrity and
is not producing reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes
from a network of poorly sited and inadequately maintained locations.

Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has yet to
respond to Sanders’s allegations. While the silence in Government,
Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of interest in the
mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be assumed that the interests
of the Net Zero promotion override any concerns about the underlying
scientific data.



“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
Dawn Flood
2024-12-25 12:33:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-
from-103-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating meteorological
data from more than one hundred non-existent weather stations to promote
the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda being promoted by
globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate models
used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the United Nations
and other global organizations in shaping climate policies and driving
alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the Met
Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not real and
simply ‘made up’ by a Government agency,” asks Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent nature of existing
published climate data, “to avoid other institutions and researchers
using unreliable data and reaching erroneous conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight sites
identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone, Dover and
Gillingham – which all produce rolling temperature averages to the
second decimal place of a degree – are “fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in the
list of Met sites with a classification from the World Meteorological
Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online inquiries about Dover
to the ”nearest climate station” at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a
full set of rolling 30-year averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as the
Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any scientific
organization would site a temperature monitoring station that is likely
to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running this station on the
beach, have accurate records been kept for 30 years and why is it not
listed under the 380 sites that are given a WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office “declined to
advise me” exactly how or where the alleged ‘data’ were derived for
these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’ temperature data from non-existent stations
is a controversial issue in the United States where the local weather
service NOAA has been charged with fabricating data for more than 30% of
its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting averages
are given an ‘E’ for estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means NOAA’s monthly and yearly
reports are not representative of reality,” says meteorologist Anthony
Watts. “If this kind of process were used in a court of law, then the
evidence would be thrown out as being polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is “clearly
fabricating” data. In addition, it is failing to meet high standards of
scientific integrity and is not producing reliable or accurate data for
climate reporting purposes from a network of poorly sited and
inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has yet to
respond to Sanders’s allegations. While the silence in Government,
Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of interest in the
mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be assumed that the
interests of the Net Zero promotion override any concerns about the
underlying scientific data.
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything
the American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information
from the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
This is just nuts. Anthropogenic global warming is absolutely real:

https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today

It's already updates for yesterday, December 24th.

Dawn
Andrew W
2024-12-25 21:05:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-
from-103-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating meteorological
data from more than one hundred non-existent weather stations to promote
the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda being promoted by
globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate models
used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the United Nations
and other global organizations in shaping climate policies and driving
alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the Met
Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations, investigator
Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302 sites supplying
temperature averages do not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not real and
simply ‘made up’ by a Government agency,” asks Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent nature of existing
published climate data, “to avoid other institutions and researchers
using unreliable data and reaching erroneous conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight sites
identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone, Dover and
Gillingham – which all produce rolling temperature averages to the second
decimal place of a degree – are “fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in the
list of Met sites with a classification from the World Meteorological
Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online inquiries about Dover
to the ”nearest climate station” at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a
full set of rolling 30-year averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as the
Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any scientific
organization would site a temperature monitoring station that is likely
to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running this station on the
beach, have accurate records been kept for 30 years and why is it not
listed under the 380 sites that are given a WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office “declined to
advise me” exactly how or where the alleged ‘data’ were derived for these
103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’ temperature data from non-existent stations
is a controversial issue in the United States where the local weather
service NOAA has been charged with fabricating data for more than 30% of
its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting averages
are given an ‘E’ for estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means NOAA’s monthly and yearly
reports are not representative of reality,” says meteorologist Anthony
Watts. “If this kind of process were used in a court of law, then the
evidence would be thrown out as being polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is “clearly
fabricating” data. In addition, it is failing to meet high standards of
scientific integrity and is not producing reliable or accurate data for
climate reporting purposes from a network of poorly sited and
inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has yet to
respond to Sanders’s allegations. While the silence in Government,
Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of interest in the
mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be assumed that the
interests of the Net Zero promotion override any concerns about the
underlying scientific data.
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything
the American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today
It's already updates for yesterday, December 24th.
The big corporations with their industrial pollution have contributed to
spoiling and mucking up the environment and ecosystem, that's true, but who
do they blame? Us and cows.
--
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
jojo
2024-12-26 15:01:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Andrew W
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-
from-103-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent
weather stations to promote the climate change narrative and
Net Zero agenda being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into
climate models used by leading institutions worldwide,
influencing the United Nations and other global organizations
in shaping climate policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to
the Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual
stations, investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103
stations out of 302 sites supplying temperature averages do
not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not
real and simply ‘made up’ by a Government agency,” asks Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent nature of
existing published climate data, “to avoid other institutions
and researchers using unreliable data and reaching erroneous
conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the
eight sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness,
Folkestone, Dover and Gillingham – which all produce rolling
temperature averages to the second decimal place of a degree –
are “fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no
weather station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four
stations appear in the list of Met sites with a classification
from the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met
Office directs online inquiries about Dover to the ”nearest
climate station” at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a full
set of rolling 30-year averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover
beach as the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely
that any scientific organization would site a temperature
monitoring station that is likely to be submerged on a regular
basis. Who is running this station on the beach, have accurate
records been kept for 30 years and why is it not listed under
the 380 sites that are given a WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
“declined to advise me” exactly how or where the alleged
‘data’ were derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’ temperature data from non-existent
stations is a controversial issue in the United States where
the local weather service NOAA has been charged with
fabricating data for more than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an ‘E’ for estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means NOAA’s monthly
and yearly reports are not representative of reality,” says
meteorologist Anthony Watts. “If this kind of process were
used in a court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out
as being polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he
has demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
“clearly fabricating” data. In addition, it is failing to meet
high standards of scientific integrity and is not producing
reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes from
a network of poorly sited and inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and
has yet to respond to Sanders’s allegations. While the silence
in Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total
lack of interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it
can only be assumed that the interests of the Net Zero
promotion override any concerns about the underlying
scientific data.
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA
Director William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when
everything the American people believes is false.” CIA
Director William Casey
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their
information from the mainstream media and calls it facts and
evidence.
This is just nuts.  Anthropogenic global warming is absolutely
https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today
It's already updates for yesterday, December 24th.
The big corporations with their industrial pollution have
contributed to spoiling and mucking up the environment and
ecosystem, that's true, but who do they blame? Us and cows.
technically if consumers chose not to consume their products
versus... in any case its all a shared responsibility, but some
have more responsibility than others.
Mitchell Holman
2024-12-25 14:18:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from-1
03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating meteorological
data from more than one hundred non-existent weather stations to
promote the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda being
promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate models
used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the United Nations
and other global organizations in shaping climate policies and driving
alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the Met
Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not real
and simply ‘made up’ by a Government agency,” asks Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent nature of
existing published climate data, “to avoid other institutions and
researchers using unreliable data and reaching erroneous
conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight sites
identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone, Dover and
Gillingham – which all produce rolling temperature averages to the
second decimal place of a degree – are “fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in
the list of Met sites with a classification from the World
Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online
inquiries about Dover to the ”nearest climate station” at Dover
Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of rolling 30-year averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as
the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring station
that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running this
station on the beach, have accurate records been kept for 30 years and
why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are given a WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office “declined
to advise me” exactly how or where the alleged ‘data’ were
derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’ temperature data from non-existent
stations is a controversial issue in the United States where the local
weather service NOAA has been charged with fabricating data for more
than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an ‘E’ for estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means NOAA’s monthly and
yearly reports are not representative of reality,” says
meteorologist Anthony Watts. “If this kind of process were used in a
court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out as being
polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is “clearly
fabricating” data. In addition, it is failing to meet high standards
of scientific integrity and is not producing reliable or accurate data
for climate reporting purposes from a network of poorly sited and
inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has yet
to respond to Sanders’s allegations. While the silence in
Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of
interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be
assumed that the interests of the Net Zero promotion override any
concerns about the underlying scientific data.
The author of your article is a certified nutcase.

His other "revelations":


"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"

"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"

"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"

"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"



https://science.feedback.org/reviewed-content-author/baxter-dmitry/
Andrew W
2024-12-25 21:17:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from-1
03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating meteorological
data from more than one hundred non-existent weather stations to
promote the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda being
promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate models
used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the United Nations
and other global organizations in shaping climate policies and driving
alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the Met
Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not real
and simply ‘made up’ by a Government agency,” asks Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent nature of
existing published climate data, “to avoid other institutions and
researchers using unreliable data and reaching erroneous
conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight sites
identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone, Dover and
Gillingham – which all produce rolling temperature averages to the
second decimal place of a degree – are “fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in
the list of Met sites with a classification from the World
Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online
inquiries about Dover to the ”nearest climate station” at Dover
Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of rolling 30-year averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as
the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring station
that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running this
station on the beach, have accurate records been kept for 30 years and
why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are given a WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office “declined
to advise me” exactly how or where the alleged ‘data’ were
derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’ temperature data from non-existent
stations is a controversial issue in the United States where the local
weather service NOAA has been charged with fabricating data for more
than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an ‘E’ for estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means NOAA’s monthly and
yearly reports are not representative of reality,” says
meteorologist Anthony Watts. “If this kind of process were used in a
court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out as being
polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is “clearly
fabricating” data. In addition, it is failing to meet high standards
of scientific integrity and is not producing reliable or accurate data
for climate reporting purposes from a network of poorly sited and
inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has yet
to respond to Sanders’s allegations. While the silence in
Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of
interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be
assumed that the interests of the Net Zero promotion override any
concerns about the underlying scientific data.
The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream authority box
and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is horribly corrupt.
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they don't know
why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them? They still claim they can't even
cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Post by Mitchell Holman
https://science.feedback.org/reviewed-content-author/baxter-dmitry/
The usual establishment disinformation propaganda. Think and reason instead.
--
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
Mitchell Holman
2024-12-25 22:33:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from
-1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent weather
stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda
being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the
Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not
real and simply ‘made up’ by a Government
agency,” asks Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent
nature of existing published climate data, “to avoid other
institutions and researchers using unreliable data and reaching
erroneous conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone,
Dover and Gillingham – which all produce rolling temperature
averages to the second decimal place of a degree – are
“fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in
the list of Met sites with a classification from the World
Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online
inquiries about Dover to the ”nearest climate station”
at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of rolling 30-year
averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as
the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring station
that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running
this station on the beach, have accurate records been kept for 30
years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are given a
WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
“declined to advise me” exactly how or where the alleged
‘data’ were derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’ temperature data from
non-existent stations is a controversial issue in the United States
where the local weather service NOAA has been charged with
fabricating data for more than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an ‘E’ for estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means NOAA’s
monthly and yearly reports are not representative of reality,”
says meteorologist Anthony Watts. “If this kind of process
were used in a court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out
as being polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
“clearly fabricating” data. In addition, it is failing
to meet high standards of scientific integrity and is not producing
reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes from a
network of poorly sited and inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has
yet to respond to Sanders’s allegations. While the silence in
Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of
interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be
assumed that the interests of the Net Zero promotion override any
concerns about the underlying scientific data.
The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream authority
box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is horribly
corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they don't
know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
Skeeter
2024-12-25 22:42:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@185.151.15.160>, ***@aol.com
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from
-1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent weather
stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda
being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the
Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
ââ?¬Å?How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not
real and simply �made up� by a Government
agency,� asks Sanders.
He calls for an ââ?¬Å?open declarationââ?¬Â of the fraudulent
nature of existing published climate data, ââ?¬Å?to avoid other
institutions and researchers using unreliable data and reaching
erroneous conclusions�.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone,
Dover and Gillingham � which all produce rolling temperature
averages to the second decimal place of a degree � are
ââ?¬Å?fictionââ?¬Â.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in
the list of Met sites with a classification from the World
Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online
inquiries about Dover to the �nearest climate station�
at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of rolling 30-year
averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as
the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring station
that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running
this station on the beach, have accurate records been kept for 30
years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are given a
WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
ââ?¬Å?declined to advise meââ?¬Â exactly how or where the alleged
�data� were derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of �inventing� temperature data from
non-existent stations is a controversial issue in the United States
where the local weather service NOAA has been charged with
fabricating data for more than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an �E� for estimate.
ââ?¬Å?The addition of the ghost station data means NOAAââ?¬â?¢s
monthly and yearly reports are not representative of reality,�
says meteorologist Anthony Watts. ââ?¬Å?If this kind of process
were used in a court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out
as being polluted,� he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
ââ?¬Å?clearly fabricatingââ?¬Â data. In addition, it is failing
to meet high standards of scientific integrity and is not producing
reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes from a
network of poorly sited and inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has
yet to respond to Sanders�s allegations. While the silence in
Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of
interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be
assumed that the interests of the Net Zero promotion override any
concerns about the underlying scientific data.
The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream authority
box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is horribly
corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they don't
know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
They don't want to cure it. To much money in covering it up.
Dawn Flood
2024-12-26 00:23:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from
-1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent weather
stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda
being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the
Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
ââ?¬Å?How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not
real and simply �made up� by a Government
agency,� asks Sanders.
He calls for an ââ?¬Å?open declarationââ?¬Â of the fraudulent
nature of existing published climate data, ââ?¬Å?to avoid other
institutions and researchers using unreliable data and reaching
erroneous conclusions�.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone,
Dover and Gillingham � which all produce rolling temperature
averages to the second decimal place of a degree � are
ââ?¬Å?fictionââ?¬Â.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in
the list of Met sites with a classification from the World
Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online
inquiries about Dover to the �nearest climate station�
at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of rolling 30-year
averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as
the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring station
that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running
this station on the beach, have accurate records been kept for 30
years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are given a
WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
ââ?¬Å?declined to advise meââ?¬Â exactly how or where the alleged
�data� were derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of �inventing� temperature data from
non-existent stations is a controversial issue in the United States
where the local weather service NOAA has been charged with
fabricating data for more than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an �E� for estimate.
ââ?¬Å?The addition of the ghost station data means NOAAââ?¬â?¢s
monthly and yearly reports are not representative of reality,�
says meteorologist Anthony Watts. ââ?¬Å?If this kind of process
were used in a court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out
as being polluted,� he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
ââ?¬Å?clearly fabricatingââ?¬Â data. In addition, it is failing
to meet high standards of scientific integrity and is not producing
reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes from a
network of poorly sited and inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has
yet to respond to Sanders�s allegations. While the silence in
Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of
interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be
assumed that the interests of the Net Zero promotion override any
concerns about the underlying scientific data.
The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream authority
box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is horribly
corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they don't
know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
They don't want to cure it. To much money in covering it up.
What about smallpox? Why was that eradicated??

Dawn
%
2024-12-26 00:31:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Andrew W
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from
-1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent weather
stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda
being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the
Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
ââ?¬Å?How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not
real and simply �made up� by a Government
agency,� asks Sanders.
He calls for an ââ?¬Å?open declarationââ?¬Â of the fraudulent
nature of existing published climate data, ââ?¬Å?to avoid other
institutions and researchers using unreliable data and reaching
erroneous conclusions�.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone,
Dover and Gillingham � which all produce rolling temperature
averages to the second decimal place of a degree � are
ââ?¬Å?fictionââ?¬Â.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in
the list of Met sites with a classification from the World
Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online
inquiries about Dover to the �nearest climate station�
at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of rolling 30-year
averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as
the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring station
that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running
this station on the beach, have accurate records been kept for 30
years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are given a
WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
ââ?¬Å?declined to advise meââ?¬Â exactly how or where the alleged
�data� were derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of �inventing� temperature data from
non-existent stations is a controversial issue in the United States
where the local weather service NOAA has been charged with
fabricating data for more than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an �E� for estimate.
ââ?¬Å?The addition of the ghost station data means NOAAââ?¬â?¢s
monthly and yearly reports are not representative of reality,�
says meteorologist Anthony Watts. ââ?¬Å?If this kind of process
were used in a court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out
as being polluted,� he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
ââ?¬Å?clearly fabricatingââ?¬Â data. In addition, it is failing
to meet high standards of scientific integrity and is not producing
reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes from a
network of poorly sited and inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has
yet to respond to Sanders�s allegations. While the silence in
Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of
interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be
assumed that the interests of the Net Zero promotion override any
concerns about the underlying scientific data.
    The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream authority
box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is horribly
corrupt.
     What do you propose doing about that?
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they don't
know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
     Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
      Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
They don't want to cure it. To much money in covering it up.
What about smallpox?  Why was that eradicated??
Dawn
it wasn't needed any more all the indians were dead
jojo
2024-12-26 15:07:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Skeeter
says...
Post by Andrew W
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from
-1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred
non-existent weather
stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net
Zero agenda
being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into
climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping
climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI)
requests to the
Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual
stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
ââ?¬Å?How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not
real and simply �made up� by a Government
agency,� asks Sanders.
He calls for an ââ?¬Å?open declarationââ?¬Â of the fraudulent
nature of existing published climate data, ââ?¬Å?to avoid other
institutions and researchers using unreliable data and
reaching
erroneous conclusions�.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness,
Folkestone,
Dover and Gillingham � which all produce rolling temperature
averages to the second decimal place of a degree � are
ââ?¬Å?fictionââ?¬Â.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been
no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in
the list of Met sites with a classification from the World
Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online
inquiries about Dover to the �nearest climate station�
at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of
rolling 30-year
averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as
the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature
monitoring station
that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running
this station on the beach, have accurate records been kept for 30
years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites that
are given a
WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
ââ?¬Å?declined to advise meââ?¬Â exactly how or where the alleged
�data� were derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of �inventing� temperature data from
non-existent stations is a controversial issue in the
United States
where the local weather service NOAA has been charged with
fabricating data for more than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the
resulting
averages are given an �E� for estimate.
ââ?¬Å?The addition of the ghost station data means
NOAA�s
monthly and yearly reports are not representative of
reality,�
says meteorologist Anthony Watts. ââ?¬Å?If this kind of process
were used in a court of law, then the evidence would be
thrown out
as being polluted,� he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that
he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
ââ?¬Å?clearly fabricatingââ?¬Â data. In addition, it is failing
to meet high standards of scientific integrity and is not producing
reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes
from a
network of poorly sited and inadequately maintained
locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has
yet to respond to Sanders�s allegations. While the silence in
Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a
total lack of
interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it can
only be
assumed that the interests of the Net Zero promotion
override any
concerns about the underlying scientific data.
    The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream authority
box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is
horribly
corrupt.
     What do you propose doing about that?
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they don't
know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
     Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
      Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
They don't want to cure it. To much money in covering it up.
What about smallpox?  Why was that eradicated??
Dawn
it wasn't needed any more all the indians were dead
that's dark. but yeah disease killed majority.
Andrew W
2024-12-25 23:28:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from
-1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent weather
stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda
being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the
Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not
real and simply ‘made up’ by a Government
agency,” asks Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent
nature of existing published climate data, “to avoid other
institutions and researchers using unreliable data and reaching
erroneous conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone,
Dover and Gillingham – which all produce rolling temperature
averages to the second decimal place of a degree – are
“fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in
the list of Met sites with a classification from the World
Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online
inquiries about Dover to the ”nearest climate station”
at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of rolling 30-year
averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as
the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring station
that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running
this station on the beach, have accurate records been kept for 30
years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are given a
WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
“declined to advise me” exactly how or where the alleged
‘data’ were derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’ temperature data from
non-existent stations is a controversial issue in the United States
where the local weather service NOAA has been charged with
fabricating data for more than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an ‘E’ for estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means NOAA’s
monthly and yearly reports are not representative of reality,”
says meteorologist Anthony Watts. “If this kind of process
were used in a court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out
as being polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
“clearly fabricating” data. In addition, it is failing
to meet high standards of scientific integrity and is not producing
reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes from a
network of poorly sited and inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has
yet to respond to Sanders’s allegations. While the silence in
Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of
interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be
assumed that the interests of the Net Zero promotion override any
concerns about the underlying scientific data.
The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream authority
box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is horribly
corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Getting together and kicking out the cartels/cabals. You seriously couldn't
think of that?
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they don't
know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
We have the most advanced tech ever. Do the math.
Profit, power/monopoly and exploitation figure greatly. Why is that always
news to people like you?
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
So you have no answer even with all your great education?
--
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
Dawn Flood
2024-12-26 00:24:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Andrew W
Post by Andrew W
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-from
-1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent weather
stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net Zero agenda
being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the
Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of 302
sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the data was not
real and simply ‘made up’ by a Government
agency,” asks Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of the fraudulent
nature of existing published climate data, “to avoid other
institutions and researchers using unreliable data and reaching
erroneous conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone,
Dover and Gillingham – which all produce rolling temperature
averages to the second decimal place of a degree – are
“fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no weather
station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations appear in
the list of Met sites with a classification from the World
Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs online
inquiries about Dover to the ”nearest climate station”
at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a full set of rolling 30-year
averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach as
the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring station
that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is running
this station on the beach, have accurate records been kept for 30
years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are given a
WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
“declined to advise me” exactly how or where the alleged
‘data’ were derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’ temperature data from
non-existent stations is a controversial issue in the United States
where the local weather service NOAA has been charged with
fabricating data for more than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an ‘E’ for estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means NOAA’s
monthly and yearly reports are not representative of reality,”
says meteorologist Anthony Watts. “If this kind of process
were used in a court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out
as being polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
“clearly fabricating” data. In addition, it is failing
to meet high standards of scientific integrity and is not producing
reliable or accurate data for climate reporting purposes from a
network of poorly sited and inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has
yet to respond to Sanders’s allegations. While the silence in
Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by a total lack of
interest in the mainstream media, is maintained, it can only be
assumed that the interests of the Net Zero promotion override any
concerns about the underlying scientific data.
   The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream authority
box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is horribly
corrupt.
   What do you propose doing about that?
Getting together and kicking out the cartels/cabals. You seriously
couldn't think of that?
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they don't
know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
   Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
We have the most advanced tech ever. Do the math.
Profit, power/monopoly and exploitation figure greatly. Why is that
always news to people like you?
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
    Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
So you have no answer even with all your great education?
It's called evolution!!

Dawn
Mitchell Holman
2024-12-26 01:00:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-fr
om -1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent
weather stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net
Zero agenda being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the
Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of
302 sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the
data was not real and simply ‘made
up’ by a Government agency,” asks
Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of
the fraudulent nature of existing published climate data,
“to avoid other institutions and researchers using
unreliable data and reaching erroneous conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone,
Dover and Gillingham – which all produce rolling
temperature averages to the second decimal place of a degree
– are “fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no
weather station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations
appear in the list of Met sites with a classification from the
World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs
online inquiries about Dover to the ”nearest climate
station” at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a
full set of rolling 30-year averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach
as the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring
station that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is
running this station on the beach, have accurate records been kept
for 30 years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are
given a WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
“declined to advise me” exactly how
or where the alleged ‘data’ were
derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’
temperature data from non-existent stations is a controversial
issue in the United States where the local weather service NOAA
has been charged with fabricating data for more than 30% of its
reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an ‘E’ for
estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means
NOAA’s monthly and yearly reports are not
representative of reality,” says meteorologist
Anthony Watts. “If this kind of process were used
in a court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out as being
polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
“clearly fabricating” data. In
addition, it is failing to meet high standards of scientific
integrity and is not producing reliable or accurate data for
climate reporting purposes from a network of poorly sited and
inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has
yet to respond to Sanders’s allegations. While
the silence in Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by
a total lack of interest in the mainstream media, is maintained,
it can only be assumed that the interests of the Net Zero
promotion override any concerns about the underlying scientific
data.
The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream
authority box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is
horribly corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Getting together and kicking out the cartels/cabals. You seriously
couldn't think of that?
What cabals?

What cartels?
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they
don't know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
We have the most advanced tech ever. Do the math.
Profit, power/monopoly and exploitation figure greatly.
There is no profit to be made by
curing fatal diseases? Seriously?
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
So you have no answer even with all your great education?
You are the one claiming there is
no money to be made by selling cures for
diseases, you tell us.
Andrew W
2024-12-26 02:28:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-fr
om -1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent
weather stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net
Zero agenda being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the
Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual stations,
investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103 stations out of
302 sites supplying temperature averages do not exist.
“How would any reasonable observer know that the
data was not real and simply ‘made
up’ by a Government agency,” asks
Sanders.
He calls for an “open declaration” of
the fraudulent nature of existing published climate data,
“to avoid other institutions and researchers using
unreliable data and reaching erroneous conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness, Folkestone,
Dover and Gillingham – which all produce rolling
temperature averages to the second decimal place of a degree
– are “fiction”.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no
weather station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four stations
appear in the list of Met sites with a classification from the
World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office directs
online inquiries about Dover to the ”nearest climate
station” at Dover Harbour (Beach) and provides a
full set of rolling 30-year averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach
as the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that any
scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring
station that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who is
running this station on the beach, have accurate records been kept
for 30 years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites that are
given a WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
“declined to advise me” exactly how
or where the alleged ‘data’ were
derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of ‘inventing’
temperature data from non-existent stations is a controversial
issue in the United States where the local weather service NOAA
has been charged with fabricating data for more than 30% of its
reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an ‘E’ for
estimate.
“The addition of the ghost station data means
NOAA’s monthly and yearly reports are not
representative of reality,” says meteorologist
Anthony Watts. “If this kind of process were used
in a court of law, then the evidence would be thrown out as being
polluted,” he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
“clearly fabricating” data. In
addition, it is failing to meet high standards of scientific
integrity and is not producing reliable or accurate data for
climate reporting purposes from a network of poorly sited and
inadequately maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and has
yet to respond to Sanders’s allegations. While
the silence in Government, Parliament and the Met Office, aided by
a total lack of interest in the mainstream media, is maintained,
it can only be assumed that the interests of the Net Zero
promotion override any concerns about the underlying scientific
data.
The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream
authority box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system is
horribly corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Getting together and kicking out the cartels/cabals. You seriously
couldn't think of that?
What cabals?
What cartels?
Huh? So there's no such thing as corruption, profiting and cartels?
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they
don't know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
We have the most advanced tech ever. Do the math.
Profit, power/monopoly and exploitation figure greatly.
There is no profit to be made by
curing fatal diseases? Seriously?
Maybe some sporadic short term profits.
Can you name some significant sustainable cases?
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
So you have no answer even with all your great education?
You are the one claiming there is
no money to be made by selling cures for
diseases, you tell us.
Dodge
No I'm not specifically making that claim. You're trying to claim there's no
profit in keeping people sick.
--
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
Mitchell Holman
2024-12-26 13:58:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-caught-inventing-climate-data-
fr om -1 03-non-existent-stations-to-push-net-zero-agenda/
A British government agency has been caught fabricating
meteorological data from more than one hundred non-existent
weather stations to promote the climate change narrative and Net
Zero agenda being promoted by globalist interests.
Alarmingly, this fabricated data has found its way into climate
models used by leading institutions worldwide, influencing the
United Nations and other global organizations in shaping climate
policies and driving alarmist narratives.
Following a number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to
the Met Office and diligent field work visiting individual
stations, investigator Ray Sanders has discovered that 103
stations out of 302 sites supplying temperature averages do not
exist.
â€Ã “How would any reasonable
observer know that the data was not real and simply
‘made
upÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€şÂ¢ by a Government
agency,” asks Sanders.
He calls for an â€Ã “open
declaration” of the fraudulent
nature of existing published climate data,
â€Ã “to avoid other institutions
and researchers using unreliable data and reaching erroneous
conclusions”.
In his home county of Kent, Sanders found that four of the eight
sites identified by the Met Office, namely Dungeness,
Folkestone, Dover and Gillingham
– which all produce
rolling temperature averages to the second decimal place of a
degree – are
â€Ã “fictionâ€
.
Daily Sceptic reports: Sanders notes that there has been no
weather station at Dungeness since 1986. None of the four
stations appear in the list of Met sites with a classification
from the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). The Met Office
directs online inquiries about Dover to the
”nearest climate
station” at Dover Harbour (Beach)
and provides a full set of rolling 30-year averages.
According to Met Office co-ordinates, the site is on Dover beach
as the Google Earth photo below shows. It seems unlikely that
any scientific organization would site a temperature monitoring
station that is likely to be submerged on a regular basis. Who
is running this station on the beach, have accurate records been
kept for 30 years and why is it not listed under the 380 sites
that are given a WMO rating?
Of the 302 sites quoted, Sanders notes that the Met Office
â€Ã “declined to advise
me” exactly how or where the
alleged
‘dataâ€âÃ
¢â‚¬ÅŸÃ‚¢ were derived for these 103 non-existent sites.
The practice of
‘inventingâ€
Ã¢â€şÂ¢ temperature data from non-existent stations is a
controversial issue in the United States where the local weather
service NOAA has been charged with fabricating data for more
than 30% of its reporting sites.
Data are retrieved from surrounding stations and the resulting
averages are given an
‘Eâ€âââ‚
¬ÅŸÃ‚¢ for estimate.
â€Ã “The addition of the ghost
station data means NOAAÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€şÂ¢s
monthly and yearly reports are not representative of
reality,” says meteorologist
Anthony Watts. â€Ã “If this kind
of process were used in a court of law, then the evidence would
be thrown out as being polluted,”
he added.
In his open letter to Peter Kyle MP, Sanders states that he has
demonstrated with hard evidence that the Met Office is
â€Ã “clearly
fabricating” data. In addition,
it is failing to meet high standards of scientific integrity and
is not producing reliable or accurate data for climate reporting
purposes from a network of poorly sited and inadequately
maintained locations.
Peter Kyle is the Minister responsible for the Met Office and
has yet to respond to
SandersÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€şÂ¢s allegations.
While the silence in Government, Parliament and the Met Office,
aided by a total lack of interest in the mainstream media, is
maintained, it can only be assumed that the interests of the Net
Zero promotion override any concerns about the underlying
scientific data.
The author of your article is a certified nutcase.
"Japan labels Covid vaccines the most
deadly drug in the history of mankind"
"Covid boosters constributed to the
deaths of millions in nursing homes"
"German government says Covid is a
global false alarm"
"Bill GAtes vows to pump Covid vaccine
into food supply to "force-jab" the
unvaccinated"
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream
authority box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system
is horribly corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Getting together and kicking out the cartels/cabals. You seriously
couldn't think of that?
What cabals?
What cartels?
Huh? So there's no such thing as corruption, profiting and cartels?
You raised the issue of medical
"cartels and cabels", post your proof.
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they
don't know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
We have the most advanced tech ever. Do the math.
Profit, power/monopoly and exploitation figure greatly.
There is no profit to be made by
curing fatal diseases? Seriously?
Maybe some sporadic short term profits.
Corporations LOVE short term profits,
it is what controls their stock value.
Post by Andrew W
Can you name some significant sustainable cases?
You complain about Big Pharma being
driven by profits, now you are saying they
are not?
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
So you have no answer even with all your great education?
You are the one claiming there is
no money to be made by selling cures for
diseases, you tell us.
Dodge
No I'm not specifically making that claim. You're trying to claim
there's no profit in keeping people sick.
Big Pharma makes money by keeping
people sick and NOT selling them a cure?

Seriously?
Malte Runz
2024-12-26 21:31:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 13:58:05 +0000, Mitchell Holman <***@aol.com>
wrote:

(snip)
Post by Mitchell Holman
Big Pharma makes money by keeping
people sick and NOT selling them a cure?
Seriously?
None of his theories are internally consistent once you start picking
them apart. Sooner or later he'll come up with an ad hoc 'explanation'
that contradicts his previous claims.
--
Malte Runz
Andrew W
2024-12-26 22:40:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Malte Runz
(snip)
Post by Mitchell Holman
Big Pharma makes money by keeping
people sick and NOT selling them a cure?
Seriously?
None of his theories are internally consistent once you start picking
them apart. Sooner or later he'll come up with an ad hoc 'explanation'
that contradicts his previous claims.
Theories? No you just don't understand the complexity of everything. A.a. is
full of mental midgets and retards.
--
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
Andrew W
2024-12-26 22:38:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream
authority box and you never even try to get out of it. Our system
is horribly corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Getting together and kicking out the cartels/cabals. You seriously
couldn't think of that?
What cabals?
What cartels?
Huh? So there's no such thing as corruption, profiting and cartels?
You raised the issue of medical
"cartels and cabels", post your proof.
So you're really clueless about systemic corruption? And you think some
areas like the medical industry etc. are somehow excluded?
And you want proof here in a nutshell? It's a very complex issue. You are
not well educated.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they
don't know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
We have the most advanced tech ever. Do the math.
Profit, power/monopoly and exploitation figure greatly.
There is no profit to be made by
curing fatal diseases? Seriously?
Maybe some sporadic short term profits.
Corporations LOVE short term profits,
it is what controls their stock value.
Idiot response. You're being a moron.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Can you name some significant sustainable cases?
You complain about Big Pharma being
driven by profits, now you are saying they
are not?
Another dumb dodge.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
So you have no answer even with all your great education?
You are the one claiming there is
no money to be made by selling cures for
diseases, you tell us.
Dodge
No I'm not specifically making that claim. You're trying to claim
there's no profit in keeping people sick.
Big Pharma makes money by keeping
people sick and NOT selling them a cure?
Seriously?
They sell 'treatments', patented drugs and surgeries. And when a drug or
surgery does cure it leads to side effects and conditions for which more
treatments are needed.
Why are you so clueless about how the world works? Are you 10 years old?
--
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
Mitchell Holman
2024-12-27 02:39:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream
authority box and you never even try to get out of it. Our
system is horribly corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Getting together and kicking out the cartels/cabals. You seriously
couldn't think of that?
What cabals?
What cartels?
Huh? So there's no such thing as corruption, profiting and cartels?
You raised the issue of medical
"cartels and cabels", post your proof.
So you're really clueless about systemic corruption? And you think
some areas like the medical industry etc. are somehow excluded?
And you want proof here in a nutshell? It's a very complex issue. You
are not well educated.
If you cannot back up your claims just say so.
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they
don't know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
We have the most advanced tech ever. Do the math.
Profit, power/monopoly and exploitation figure greatly.
There is no profit to be made by
curing fatal diseases? Seriously?
Maybe some sporadic short term profits.
Corporations LOVE short term profits,
it is what controls their stock value.
Idiot response. You're being a moron.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Can you name some significant sustainable cases?
You complain about Big Pharma being
driven by profits, now you are saying they
are not?
Another dumb dodge.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
So you have no answer even with all your great education?
You are the one claiming there is
no money to be made by selling cures for
diseases, you tell us.
Dodge
No I'm not specifically making that claim. You're trying to claim
there's no profit in keeping people sick.
Big Pharma makes money by keeping
people sick and NOT selling them a cure?
Seriously?
They sell 'treatments', patented drugs and surgeries. And when a drug
or surgery does cure it leads to side effects and conditions for which
more treatments are needed.
If you don't like the status
of medical technology show us an
alternative. What is the homopathic
cure for ovarian cancer? What is
the home remedy for malaria? Show
the natural treatment for epilepsy?
Andrew W
2024-12-27 02:53:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
You are nuts. Your mind is stuck in a conditioned mainstream
authority box and you never even try to get out of it. Our
system is horribly corrupt.
What do you propose doing about that?
Getting together and kicking out the cartels/cabals. You seriously
couldn't think of that?
What cabals?
What cartels?
Huh? So there's no such thing as corruption, profiting and cartels?
You raised the issue of medical
"cartels and cabels", post your proof.
So you're really clueless about systemic corruption? And you think
some areas like the medical industry etc. are somehow excluded?
And you want proof here in a nutshell? It's a very complex issue. You
are not well educated.
If you cannot back up your claims just say so.
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
With all the decades of cancer and other disease research and
billions/trillions of our money spent they still claim that they
don't know why cancer etc. happen or how to cure them?
Imagine that. Mankind has not cured all
diseases yet. Is that because of "corruption"?
We have the most advanced tech ever. Do the math.
Profit, power/monopoly and exploitation figure greatly.
There is no profit to be made by
curing fatal diseases? Seriously?
Maybe some sporadic short term profits.
Corporations LOVE short term profits,
it is what controls their stock value.
Idiot response. You're being a moron.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Can you name some significant sustainable cases?
You complain about Big Pharma being
driven by profits, now you are saying they
are not?
Another dumb dodge.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by Andrew W
They still claim they
can't even cure the common cold, and you just believe them.
Why does the common cold still infect
people? Oh, right - "corruption". Got it.
So you have no answer even with all your great education?
You are the one claiming there is
no money to be made by selling cures for
diseases, you tell us.
Dodge
No I'm not specifically making that claim. You're trying to claim
there's no profit in keeping people sick.
Big Pharma makes money by keeping
people sick and NOT selling them a cure?
Seriously?
They sell 'treatments', patented drugs and surgeries. And when a drug
or surgery does cure it leads to side effects and conditions for which
more treatments are needed.
If you don't like the status
of medical technology show us an
alternative. What is the homopathic
cure for ovarian cancer? What is
the home remedy for malaria? Show
the natural treatment for epilepsy?
You have to be shown everything because your brain doesn't work.
--
“We own everyone of any significance in the major media.” CIA Director
William Colby
“We’ll know when our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the
American people believes is false.” CIA Director William Casey

Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.
Loading...