Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WPost by Malte Runz(snip)
Post by Andrew WPost by Andrew WPost by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WWho said he wants to put "micro chip in billions of people's brain"?
https://tinyurl.com/4yw4j5p6
See what I did there?
No rebuttal?conspiritorising
You didn't read it properly. Musk is talking about helping disabled people.
Of course he is. The world's richest man just wants to help disabled
people. Not like Bill Gates. He just wants to kill, kill, kill.
You honestly can't see the difference between them, what they've experienced
and done and their fairly apparent agendas?
I know your perverted ideas about Bill Gates and his wanting 'to kill
billions!!!'. It's idiocy.
It's documented and known to be true. ...
No, it's not. I've seen the video. Gates talks about bettering the
conditions for people in the poorest parts of the world, so that
parents don't need to have ten children to make sure they have a few
to help them through their last years.
(snip)
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WHow exactly is Musk by himself going to force microchips into billions of
normal people's brains against their will?
How is Bill Gates himself going to kill billions of people against
their will?
Simple, by financing and promoting toxic vaccines, and his masters ...
'It's the cabal!!!'
... forcing
them on everyone across the world. ...
How can Gates force people to get the vaccines?
'It's the cabal!!!'
Post by Malte Runzhttps://tinyurl.com/y3fjwjtv
"If all goes well, there will be hundreds of people with Neuralinks
within a few years, maybe tens of thousands within five years,
millions within 10 years, Mr Musk wrote on X in response to
Neuralinks blog post."
And what people was he talking about? Healthy people?
He uses disabled and desperate people as guinea pigs. Have you never
heard of Project MKUltra????
Post by Malte RunzAnd you're perfectly fine with the idea, that millions of people will
have chip implanted into their brains? By a guy who wants us all to
buy his electric cars!
Shouldn't they instead just have a healthy dose of zinc and natural
vitamins?
How is Musk going to do it against their will?
The cabal, of course. It's always the cabal.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WWhen it comes to Trump you say 'I'm just saying exactly what he said', which
is always sound bites out of context, ...
Bullshit. Most of the time I link to the full text from where his
quotes are taken.
And you slant, interpolate and conspiratorize them.
I quote the motherfucker, and it's not my fault he sounds like a
conspiracy theorist.
Like the Project 2025 conspiracy *future* predictions by the loony left. How
does the left know the future?
They can remote view the future. Just like your crazy haired cat lady
said she could.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew W... but with Musk you ignore what he says
and just speculate. And you try to claim that I'm a conspiracy theorist.
Again, I was parodying. But it seems you spotted the plain idiocy
behind that way of thinking. Progress!
Why are you such a clown and loon? You've got nothing real or factual to
offer.
You mean like quotes. stats, video evidence? When ever I do, you
dismiss it offhandedly as 'fake lib dem woke marxist lies!!!'
Post by Malte Runz(snip)
Post by Andrew WPost by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WYou still believe that EVs are more prone to fire than ICE vehicles
despite all data are proving you wrong.
You've been fed lies by Marxists.
So, "marxists" are spreading lies about the number of EV fires.
Interesting. How do you know the numbers are wrong?
Research on what's really happening in the world ...
But not anything with numbers. That's a no-no.
You're obsessed with numbers from your sources because it saves you from
thinking for yourself.
You refuse to accept numbers because you want to make up your own
story.
Post by Malte Runz"It's not possible to get precise numbers in a world of shady
practices."
So, what is it you research to be able to come to the conclusion that
EVs catch fire more often that ICE vehicles?
Independent research ...
How do your independent researchers know that EVs catch fire more
often than ICE vehicles if the numbers aren't trustworthy?
... and experience by non gov. restricted
individuals/experts as well as direct experiencers. Can you not find any?
Why not? Answer: Because you hate listening to ordinary people, despite if
they might actually be telling the truth.
If your people don't count the number of incidents regarding burning
vehicles, how can they conclude that EV's burn more often?
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew Wand systemic corruption as
opposed to what the masses are told. You just accept the latter. Sheep.
How does corruption cause fires in EVs?
By pushing bad lithium battery tech instead of better but less profitable
solutions.
What are those better solutions in your opinion? One of the youtubers
I named in my list the other day, "Just have a think", knows a lot
about all that. But you lumped him in with the 'woke left dem MSM
blah, blah, blah' crowd.
(snip)
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WPost by Malte RunzI am convinced that there are other intelligent life forms, other than
those native to Earth, elsewhere in the Universe. It's a numbers game,
really. But they are not here, and we have found no evidence of their
existence.
And how do you know they're not here? ...
You're right. They could have landed five minutes ago. I'm sure it'll
be in the news.
It won't be in the news.
The cabal will hide from the gullible masses? But your lot will know
all about it... somehow.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew W... Plenty of people have seen and even
met them.
I don't believe them.
But you believe governments and corporations.
Sometimes. Do you believe Trump and Putin and Orban and Musk all the
time?
Post by Malte RunzBring me a good, high resolution video and
audio, from multiple angels, and then we can talk.
That's a big ask. They don't pose for publicity videos.
No center folds in the Orion Gazette?
Post by Malte RunzYou believe those who claim to
have seen aliens, been abducted and probed, or have reverse engineered
the spaceships.
No I don't just believe them. ...
Yes, you do. You have no way of verifying an abduction story, or a UFO
sighting. You either believe them or don't.
...I gather info, reports, testimonies, docs from
prominent people ...
Authorities. Here you are again appealing to them.
... /experiencers over decades.
There exists zero images of aliens or UFO's that prove their existence
here on Earth. We've over this many times. When pressed hard enough
you have to admit that images can be faked and therefore don't count.
There isn't any physical evidence know to the public either, because
the cabal is hiding it from us.
What's left? Anecdotal evidence that's all.
Post by Malte RunzI don't buy any of it,
You've never even researched it.
What's there to research apart from people's testimony? You say it
yourself above. "info, reports, testimonies, docs from prominent
people".
You seem to be stuck on either 'believe or not believe'. That's the problem
religion followers have.
How do /you/ verify people's testimonies?
Atheists are just the total opposite of religionists. Both just rely on
being spoon fed stuff but don't think.
Post by Malte Runzand since there is no physical
evidence to support their claims, I dismiss them... just like that.
And who says there's no physical evidence? ...
I do. Prove me wrong. And no, I cannot prove there is not physical
evidence, and it is not my job. You claim there is physical evidence,
you provide proof there off.
... Your gov. controlled sources do,
that's who. Why do you unthinkingly parrot them?
Prove that "gov." is in possession of physical evidence. A guy
claiming his superiors have told him that they have it is NOT
evidence. 'I can show you where I was standing when I saw the aliens
crawls out of the UFO,' That's not evidence either.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WGovernments and corporations are back engineering their tech.
I hadn't read this far down when I replied above. As I've said, you're
predictable as hell.
Truth is predictable. But loonies are predictable too.
You have no evidence to back up your claims about reverse engineered
UFOs other than people telling you it happens. You choose to believe
those people, and I don't.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WThere are obvious cover ups. There's plenty of evidence but you don't look, ...
I'd be all over the evidence if there were any. You have know idea how
much I'd love it if aliens came to Earth. But all you do is claim that
the evidence exists, only make excuses for why you can't show it.
I know, you like to be spoon fed.
QED!
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew Wbut you act like an expert who knows the 'facts'.
There are no facts to be known about alien life,
How are you so sure about that? You've never looked at anything except the
lying mainstream.
You believe the people who say they have seen aliens. Why?
'Why would they lie about it?'
You're so naive!
Post by Malte Runzsince we have no
examples thereof. Someone claiming to have been abducted is not
evidence.
It wasn't just one person.
I see the contours of the 'argumentum ad Populum' fallacy taking form.
'If so many people report having had the same kind of experience it
must be true!'
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WPost by Malte RunzWhat I say is 'crazy nonsense' is all the stories you believers have
created.
Who creates these stories and for what purpose? ...
You underestimates you fellow humans' need for attention. Attention
and monetary rewards.
Military people want attention?
Why not? Are they somehow above that?
Remember the guy who sat in Congress talking about UFO's about 6-7
months ago? He loved being the center of attention. He looked a bit
uneasy, though. Maybe it dawned on him, that he looked kinda silly
sitting there trying to sell his far out story. Almost like he
realized that people had been playing for a fool.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew W... They'd risk losing their careers for this?
If the book deal is good enough if might be worth it to them. But, as
I've said a million times, anecdotal evidence does not suffice.
You never investigated any of this yet you act like an expert with full
certainty. You totally fell for the gov. cover ups.
What is there to investigate?
'Did you really see that UFO?'
'Yes!'
'Cross your heart and hope to die?'
'Yes, I swear!!!'
'Did you take a photo of it?'
'No, it all happened so fast, but I know what I saw was something from
another world.'
'Well, that settles it. Negative space aliens from Orion are here.'
(snip)
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WMainstream scientists just toe the line of the narrative.
Do you even know why governments don't want us to know about this stuff?
'Have you stopped beating your wife' argument. Try again.
Big dodge.
Not a dodge. If I gave you a reason for why "governments don't want us
to know about this stuff" I would admit that they do hide stuff about
UFOs. If I replied 'No, I don't know why "governments don't want us to
know about this stuff" I'd also be admitting that they do. And I don't
believe any government hides anything about aliens roaming the Earth.
(snip)
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WMusk is very busy and cannot always be in two places at once. But did his
son not suffer from gender dysphoria before Musk did anything wrong? ...
Interesting choice of words you've got there. "Suffer from". The only
reason people with gender dysphoria suffer, is because of shit heads
like Musk, who cannot accept that their children aren't 'normal'.
That's it, always just blame and bash the convenient figure that the rest of
the left blame. No self thinking.
Musk's reaction to his child's 'condition' is just a perfect example
of why trans gender people often suffer. The world is full of people
like him.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew W... It's so
easy to just blame people like Musk all the time.
In this case he's the one to blame.
Said without checking into anything but going on assumptions.
I checked Musk's reaction to his son being trans gender. It's what
we're talking about, isn't it?
(snip)
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WPost by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WPost by Andrew WAre you clueless about everything?
Did anyone physically die? Yeas or no?
There's different defs of death.
So the person we talk about is not dead. They haven't been "destroyed"
or "killed" regardless of how Musk feels about it. Are we done?
He's dead to Musk. ...
Bingo! As I said above, Musk is a shithead, who is largely responsible
for the suffering Vivian might experience.
He's a lot smarter and achieved more than you. ...
He's still an asshole for treating his child the way he does.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew W... Others have had this happen to them by
the corrupt medical system.
Your immaturity and failure to understand things is really showing.
Bullocks. People with gender dysphoria are born that way. If you had
spent any time at all trying to understand what it is, you would have
known that. And so would Musk.
You failed to think and research again. ...
So, you believe you know what it means to be trans gender? You know
what 'causes' it, and who is responsible?
By the way, have you ever met a trans gender person? Spoken to the
parents of one?
... The corrupt medical industry and
food companies put toxins in our food and medications and that's why there
are so many birth defects.
Here you are talking about numbers again. Don't you know that you
cannot trust any stats or numbers!
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WPost by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WThe fact, that some governments hide some things from the public, is
not evidence of a government hiding whatever specific 'thing' you
claim they're hiding.
Another clueless circular response.
You're right. I should have dumbed it down even more. Here goes.
'Gov sometimes bad. Not proof gov always bad.'
When have you admitted that the gov. is bad? ...
I've said plenty about Putin and his cleptocracy.
But none in America? Well one as of 2016.
Always just pointing the finger at convenient or far away figures and
created boogiemen.
Putin is much closer than Trump to where I am, and he is also posing a
far greater risk to my part of the world.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew W... You just blame Trump for
everything. What about before Trump came along?
The world is full of leaders I don't like. Trump is only one of them.
But there was not much corruption in America before the MSM and Dems decided
to take down Trump?
I'm not defending any American president or the MSM. Why do you insist
on humping that old strawman?
(snip)
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WYou just followed the narrative again. Check the studies of independent
research.
Bovaer contains toxins such as silicon dioxide, ...
Silicon dioxide is a completely natural compound, made of Si and O2,
two of the most abundant elements found on Earth. You find the
compound in water, in soil, and in many life forms. It is not a toxin.
That's only what mainstream sources/corporations say for obvious reasons.
Jesus fucking Christ... do you believe sand is a toxin? This is so
pathetic. SiO2 is the most abundant compound on Earth. Over 40% by
weight.
Silicon dioxide nanoparticles induced neurobehavioral impairments by
disrupting microbiotagutbrain axis
https://jnanobiotechnology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12951-021-00916-2
('You just believe what the indoctrinators from universities tell
you!!!')
"Conclusion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that elucidates
that oral exposure to SiO2NPs results in the spatial learning and
memory impairments and locomotor inhibition via distinctive gutbrain
axis. The implications of this study include the novel idea that
proper maintenance and coordination of gut functions may be critical
for protection against the neurotoxicity of foodborne SiO2NPs because
of the multifaceted system of gutbrain bidirectional communication.
This study may also provide valuable scientific evidence for policy
makers to evaluate the safety of SiO2NPs in infant food applications."
If their findings really EXPOSED!!! the horrible efforts by the cabal
to poison humanity with their toxic food additives, why do they allow
the research to take place, and even let the research be published by
"the media"?
I'm all for thorough testing of everything that is used in the food
industry. Of course I am, and if it turns out that SiO2NPs is a health
risk of course it shouldn't be used. The study at hand didn't show
that, though.
Post by Malte RunzYou had no idea, did you?
You're the one who has no ideas of your own, 5min web mainstream results
searcher.
I already knew what SiO2 is. You cannot have studied geology without
having learned about it.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew W... propylene glycol ...
Also not a toxin (because it is synthetic and not produced by a plant
or animal, do learn the jargon), nor is it toxic. Unless you drink
large quantities, or soak in it for long periods. Odds are, though,
that you have eaten a lot of it, since it is used in many different
everyday food products.
Which is why people have been getting sicker over the decades. ...
How do you know that to be the case? Remember, you cannot trust any
numbers you might find on the internet.
... It's the
cumulative long term effect that's the problem.
How do you know? And even if it turns out to be the case, you cannot
jump to the conclusion that there is malice behind the use of those
products. Do you think the cabal invented Thalidomide because They
wanted to horribly cripple children?
Same with fluoride in the water.
And centrals!
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew W... and
3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP).
Yes, that's the stuff that reduces methane. Show me a study the says
it is toxic. You know you can't and you're not going to try. Instead
you'll blame me for not having found the studies you know don't exist.
We are told there are no short term effects but there could be long term
effects. When things combine the effects can be negative. We shouldn't
tamper with nature.
You're the one arguing that we should use fossils fuels rather than
wind and solar.
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WBill Gates New Feed Additive Boaver Linked to Male Infertility and
Reproductive Damage
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/bill-gates-new-feed-additive-boaver-linked-to-male-infertility-and-reproductive-damage/
It's not "Boaver", but "Bovaer". Typos in headlines speak volumes
about their seriousness.
Typos are just typos.
I know. I make them all the time, but I expect better from a news
outlet that expects to be taken serious.
Post by Malte RunzAnd you really are an idiot! The People's
Voice is a well known fake news site,
Claim the leftists.
Do you believe this to be true?
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/study-common-air-pollutants-increase-risk-of-fatal-blood-clots/
***
Study: Common Air Pollutants Increase Risk of Fatal Blood Clots
...
These pollutants are pervasive in the environment, stemming from
common sources like motor vehicle exhaust, smoke from forest fires and
emissions from fossil fuel power plants. ...
***
Fossil fuel power plants cause fatal blood clots! And you believe 'Big
Fossil Fuel' when they tell you that their products are harmless,
don't you. Yes, you do, because the leftists want to go green, and
leftists are bad people.
Post by Malte Runzand they don't even try to hide
it. Do you think they expected anyone to believe their story about
Justin Trudeau being the love child of Fidel fucking Castro? The
'pizza-gate' nonsense? They are laughing their heads off at people
like you, who uncritically swallow their made up stories. Are you
going to cite Alex Jones next?
An MSM clinger throws stones again.
Do you believe that Trudeau is the love child of Castro? Do you
believe that Hilary Clinton ran a child sex ring under a pizzeria
(that doesn't have a basement)?
(snip)
Post by Malte RunzPost by Andrew WDo you honestly believe the crap that artificially reducing some methane
from cows, which have been on this planet for a very long time is going to
and needs to save the planet? Do you just believe everything governments and
corporations say?
No.
You back them.
Pointing out flaws in your logic ('gov. sometimes bad = gov always
bad') is not the backing of any government.
--
Malte Runz