Discussion:
computations for you
Add Reply
jojo
2024-12-28 02:31:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a
paper recently released by google about their new quantum chip
willow. they claim that the calculation it performed would
require a classical computer orders of magnitude more than the
age of the universe.

then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence
it is probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel
universes? something to that effect...

i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says
the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.

so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another
universe with our quantum computations.
Dawn Flood
2024-12-28 03:00:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a paper
recently released by google about their new quantum chip willow. they
claim that the calculation it performed would require a classical
computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed would
need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it is
probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says the
universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another universe
with our quantum computations.
I think that it is all a bunch of crap and here's why:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge

Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above, and then
(and, only then), get back to me.

Dawn
jojo
2024-12-28 11:56:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a
paper recently released by google about their new quantum chip
willow. they claim that the calculation it performed would
require a classical computer orders of magnitude more than the
age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it
performed would need more atoms than are present in the
universe and hence it is probably borrowing the additional ones
from parallel universes? something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which
says the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another
universe with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above, and
then (and, only then), get back to me.
Dawn
its going to happen dawn, but the timeline is more like 2030, not
in the next couple of years. with willow, google made a major
breakthrough in error correction, the whole decoherence problem.
apparently, the more qbits they add, the easier it becomes to
error correct.

but i dont understand how, its beyond my level of understanding
right now.
Dawn Flood
2024-12-28 12:00:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dawn Flood
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a paper
recently released by google about their new quantum chip willow. they
claim that the calculation it performed would require a classical
computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it
is probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says the
universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another
universe with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above, and then
(and, only then), get back to me.
Dawn
its going to happen dawn, but the timeline is more like 2030, not in the
next couple of years. with willow, google made a major breakthrough in
error correction, the whole decoherence problem. apparently, the more
qbits they add, the easier it becomes to error correct.
but i dont understand how, its beyond my level of understanding right now.
Time will, of course, tell. Here's an interesting article for you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm

From the above article:

"Given the high error rates of contemporary quantum computers and too
few qubits to use quantum error correction, laboratory demonstrations
obtain correct results only in a fraction of attempts."

Dawn
jojo
2024-12-28 15:22:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by jojo
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was
a paper recently released by google about their new quantum
chip willow. they claim that the calculation it performed
would require a classical computer orders of magnitude more
than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it
performed would need more atoms than are present in the
universe and hence it is probably borrowing the additional
ones from parallel universes? something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which
says the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another
universe with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above,
and then (and, only then), get back to me.
Dawn
its going to happen dawn, but the timeline is more like 2030,
not in the next couple of years. with willow, google made a
major breakthrough in error correction, the whole decoherence
problem. apparently, the more qbits they add, the easier it
becomes to error correct.
but i dont understand how, its beyond my level of understanding right now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
"Given the high error rates of contemporary quantum computers and
too few qubits to use quantum error correction, laboratory
demonstrations obtain correct results only in a fraction of
attempts."
Dawn
yes and that is the breakthrough with willow, error correction
holy grail:

https://blog.google/technology/research/google-willow-quantum-chip/
Peter Steele
2024-12-28 21:45:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by jojo
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a
paper recently released by google about their new quantum chip
willow. they claim that the calculation it performed would require
a classical computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the
universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it
is probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says
the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another
universe with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above, and then
(and, only then), get back to me.
Dawn
its going to happen dawn, but the timeline is more like 2030, not in
the next couple of years. with willow, google made a major
breakthrough in error correction, the whole decoherence problem.
apparently, the more qbits they add, the easier it becomes to error
correct.
but i dont understand how, its beyond my level of understanding right now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
"Given the high error rates of contemporary quantum computers and too
few qubits to use quantum error correction, laboratory demonstrations
obtain correct results only in a fraction of attempts."
Dawn
https://blog.google/technology/research/google-willow-quantum-chip/
Error correction in general?

Probably more interesting is error correction in coding schemes. Data
encoding such as that on the surface of a compact disc. Here's a
website for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere_packing

This is why you get beeps and chirps from scratches and abrasions on the
surface. I think the player can recognize some far out sounds which
makes it skip too because it knows the signal was wrong.
Dawn Flood
2024-12-28 23:51:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by jojo
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a
paper recently released by google about their new quantum chip
willow. they claim that the calculation it performed would require
a classical computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the
universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it
is probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says
the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another
universe with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above, and then
(and, only then), get back to me.
Dawn
its going to happen dawn, but the timeline is more like 2030, not in
the next couple of years. with willow, google made a major
breakthrough in error correction, the whole decoherence problem.
apparently, the more qbits they add, the easier it becomes to error
correct.
but i dont understand how, its beyond my level of understanding right now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
"Given the high error rates of contemporary quantum computers and too
few qubits to use quantum error correction, laboratory demonstrations
obtain correct results only in a fraction of attempts."
Dawn
https://blog.google/technology/research/google-willow-quantum-chip/
Fine. Let their quantum computer factor this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_numbers#RSA-1024

Simple, no?

Dawn
Peter Steele
2024-12-28 21:41:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dawn Flood
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a paper
recently released by google about their new quantum chip willow. they
claim that the calculation it performed would require a classical
computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it
is probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says the
universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another
universe with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above, and then
(and, only then), get back to me.
Dawn
its going to happen dawn, but the timeline is more like 2030, not in the
next couple of years. with willow, google made a major breakthrough in
error correction, the whole decoherence problem. apparently, the more
qbits they add, the easier it becomes to error correct.
but i dont understand how, its beyond my level of understanding right now.
Oh no, she was talking about a cryptography problem. Cryptography is
like learning the abacus. I didn't stop there with my learning. It's
about doing a bunch of tough calculations over and over. Maybe more
interesting is decryption without a key. To me, at least.
jojo
2024-12-28 23:55:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Peter Steele
Post by jojo
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was
a paper recently released by google about their new quantum
chip willow. they claim that the calculation it performed
would require a classical computer orders of magnitude more
than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it
performed would need more atoms than are present in the
universe and hence it is probably borrowing the additional
ones from parallel universes? something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which
says the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another
universe with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above,
and then (and, only then), get back to me.
Dawn
its going to happen dawn, but the timeline is more like 2030,
not in the next couple of years. with willow, google made a
major breakthrough in error correction, the whole decoherence
problem. apparently, the more qbits they add, the easier it
becomes to error correct.
but i dont understand how, its beyond my level of understanding right now.
Oh no, she was talking about a cryptography problem.
Cryptography is like learning the abacus.  I didn't stop there
with my learning.  It's about doing a bunch of tough calculations
over and over.  Maybe more interesting is decryption without a
key.  To me, at least.
yeah i am talking about cryptography, quantum chips can blow all
the current schemes into... well they can break it. but we are
not there yet.

moreover, most protocols will move past 256-bit level, or even go
into quantum cryptography.
Dawn Flood
2024-12-29 00:09:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a
paper recently released by google about their new quantum chip
willow. they claim that the calculation it performed would require
a classical computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the
universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it
is probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says
the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another
universe with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above, and then
(and, only then), get back to me.
Dawn
its going to happen dawn, but the timeline is more like 2030, not in
the next couple of years. with willow, google made a major
breakthrough in error correction, the whole decoherence problem.
apparently, the more qbits they add, the easier it becomes to error
correct.
but i dont understand how, its beyond my level of understanding right now.
Oh no, she was talking about a cryptography problem. Cryptography is
like learning the abacus.  I didn't stop there with my learning.  It's
about doing a bunch of tough calculations over and over.  Maybe more
interesting is decryption without a key.  To me, at least.
yeah i am talking about cryptography, quantum chips can blow all the
current schemes into... well they can break it. but we are not there yet.
moreover, most protocols will move past 256-bit level, or even go into
quantum cryptography.
You can look this one up, but the largest number that has been factored
by a quantum computer to date is 261,980,999,226,229. I just typed this
into my "Factor Calculator" Android app on my Samsung A54; as soon as I
hit "Find All Factors", the result was returned.

Dawn
jojo
2024-12-29 00:30:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by jojo
Post by Peter Steele
Post by jojo
Post by Dawn Flood
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there
was a paper recently released by google about their new
quantum chip willow. they claim that the calculation it
performed would require a classical computer orders of
magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it
performed would need more atoms than are present in the
universe and hence it is probably borrowing the additional
ones from parallel universes? something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which
says the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of
another universe with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above,
and then (and, only then), get back to me.
Dawn
its going to happen dawn, but the timeline is more like 2030,
not in the next couple of years. with willow, google made a
major breakthrough in error correction, the whole decoherence
problem. apparently, the more qbits they add, the easier it
becomes to error correct.
but i dont understand how, its beyond my level of
understanding right now.
Oh no, she was talking about a cryptography problem.
Cryptography is like learning the abacus.  I didn't stop there
with my learning.  It's about doing a bunch of tough
calculations over and over.  Maybe more interesting is
decryption without a key.  To me, at least.
yeah i am talking about cryptography, quantum chips can blow
all the current schemes into... well they can break it. but we
are not there yet.
moreover, most protocols will move past 256-bit level, or even
go into quantum cryptography.
You can look this one up, but the largest number that has been
factored by a quantum computer to date is 261,980,999,226,229.  I
just typed this into my "Factor Calculator" Android app on my
Samsung A54; as soon as I hit "Find All Factors", the result was
returned.
Dawn
i want to buy a new phone actually, but i dont have the luxury
money right now.
Peter Steele
2024-12-28 21:36:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dawn Flood
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a paper
recently released by google about their new quantum chip willow. they
claim that the calculation it performed would require a classical
computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it is
probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says the
universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another universe
with our quantum computations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge
Let one of their quantum computers factor one of the above, and then
(and, only then), get back to me.
I consider this an obscure and arbitrary choice. There exist other
computational problems. Fuck cryptography.
In the Name of Jesus
2024-12-28 04:08:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a paper
recently released by google about their new quantum chip willow. they
claim that the calculation it performed would require a classical
computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed would
need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it is
probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says the
universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Did you distill that from the FSM?

Only atheists talk about multiverses because they live by the facts and
not faith! :-).





In the Name of Jesus
so in conclusion, we might be disturbing the peace of another universe
with our quantum computations.
--
God is God in all His Being. All the glory is His, for He is all glory.

Jesus is the everlasting Father, Jesus is God, Jesus is the Lord. John
10:30  I and Father are one. If you can't see that the Lord Jesus is the
everlasting Father you are not born again and can't see the Kingdom of God.

Colossians 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
YET sinners, Christ died for us.

Jeremiah 10:23 O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it
is not in man that walketh to direct his steps.

Psalms 53:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt
are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good.

Proverbs 12:15 The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that
hearkeneth unto counsel is wise.

"To seek your own will is to seek your own glory."

"If God is not first in everything, He is not first in anything."

"What makes the bible the truth? The resonance (voice, the Person) of
God. When you find Him you have found the author."

"All men were born sinners. Why? Because all men were born not loving
God with all their heart, soul, and mind. An abomination. Therefore,
sin is not what you do; it is what you are."

"Compromise will condemn you."

"There are no sinners in Christ Jesus."

"My sons are born of Me. In them is no darkness at all."

"You can't learn righteousness. Haven't you had enough time already to
know that?"

"The way of truth is the testimony of life."

"I merely speak the truth, what is revealed to me, and the cards fall
where God intends."

"Nothing that is produced is produced without first being faith."

"You can only find proof of God through faith because that is how we all
live, by faith."

"It is not what you do that matters, it is how you treat Me."

"Keep going forward. Forget about the past. Lift up your head, look
ahead."

"You cannot be free, and free indeed with guilt in your heart."

"Priority is everything."

"The truth doesn't need evidence, it is evidence."

"There is no greater possession a man has than his own will, to squander
it or to place it where it truly belongs."

"An atheist is a fool who thinks truth is found in living a lie."

"Saying "prove it" [as a foundation] is merely an ignorant straw man, to
an ignorant straw man."

"Wait, rest, be still, and know."

"No man can wash his own hands!!!"

"I find this in the Christianity religions: 'Nobody's perfect' they say,
and they use that as an excuse not to do what is perfect."

"The Atheist: "They don't believe and put their faith in a Creator (the
obvious). So no evidence or proof is to be found."

"The world is the way it is because God can't compromise who He is."

"Man is not the centre of being."

"Man is incompatible with the natural world because of his sinful nature."

"And then the Lord said, "I see everything."

"Man has no greater idol than his own will."

"Where is God hiding? He isn't."

"If you don't keep all the scriptures, you can't keep any of them."

"You can't prove anything because everything depends on a person's
willingness to believe."

"Atheists are ultimately trying to be pointlessness, meaninglessness,
and purposelessness in their point, meaning, and purpose."

"The last day of creation will be the last day of time. God is always
full of hope."

"The veil of the temple was rent in twain, not so that a book could pass
through it for a sinner to play God."

"A phylactery does not a heart for God make. Not back then, and not today."

"No one in heaven is better (or higher) than what makes it heaven. Such
is the love of God."

"The definition of an atheist: a man full of bluster and bullshit in his
meaninglessness pretending he is the meaning of life."

"Free will is not power; it is the choice that I allow; that choice is
still according to my power," says the Lord.

"What does a fool do? A fool looks for a "nothing" in a "something" in
order to explain the existence of existence."

"Unless you do all because He is who He is, all your religion is in vain."

"Every man is subject to God; He judges every man, and He is reality.
 What a gift in a fallen world!"

"Love MUST be a choice or it is nothing but a law!"

"Why were all men born sinners? So that God could reveal Himself, so
that we would behold the glory of God, and that we should bring forth
the glory of God"

"God does not and will not arbitrate for any man to love Him! If God
isn't everything to you, He is nothing to you where the rubber meets the
road."

"It is the unforgivable sin not to love God with all your heart, soul,
and mind. What do you have that is lasting? It is not so much being
punished; it is what you are left with."

"Love isn't worth anything without first a free will choice for God to
birth it in a man."

"The point of salvation: desperation. Anything less than that is
self-righteousness."

"A sinner is not a believer in God; a sinner is a believer in sin."

"A piece of dirt is not the promised land; that is only a reflection.
The promised land is knowing Me, says the Lord."

"It is all about God or it is all about idolatry."

"The Lord Jesus is coming soon. He has always come soon."

"There is no revolving door of self-worship in a son of God's life!"

"There is no such thing as random!"

"You can't truly love without it being with all your heart."

"No one can see God without their whole heart. Unless you can see God,
you know nothing."

"You can't learn God; God has to reveal Himself to you."

"No sinner is sinless in any way."

"Only God is life; only the Kingdom of God of His "Nature" is life."

"What you believe is just a leaning on your own understanding; faith is
a leaning on the one you have chosen to trust."

"God uses the "letter" to crucify a man and raise him from the dead."

"Not fearing God is sheer stupidity for sinners."

"Self-righteousness is any exclusion of God in your heart, because any
exclusion reveals that you think more about yourself than what you
really are."

"Atheism: "The claim that life received from itself."

"But remember this: always, absolutely always, all the glory is the
Lord's and His alone, and anyone who takes any credit for anything, you
know, instantly, he is not what he pretends to be and is a false prophet."

"That light had to bear (bears all things) the darkness for us, but that
light did not ever become darkness."

"You must reach beyond the bible that tells you about Him, and into your
daily life to find Him in Person. He's there."

"What is wrong with Christendom? False understanding based on compromise."

"It is not in man to love his enemies. And if he tries, he is walking in
a lie and trying to raise himself up to the level of God."

"God has to be quiet now; we have our bible. Well, then, who is going to
speak?"

"It is all about the Lord in His glory and whether a man loves Him with
all for who He is."

"A son of God became the bible when he was born again because the Holy
Spirit took up residence in his heart as Lord."

"The veil of the temple was not rent in twain so that a bible could pass
as God."

"It is dreadfully difficult for religious people to repent of all they
are as they have spent their whole lives reinforcing to themselves that
they are "good sinners."
Dawn Flood
2024-12-28 05:05:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by In the Name of Jesus
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a paper
recently released by google about their new quantum chip willow. they
claim that the calculation it performed would require a classical
computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it is
probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says the
universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Did you distill that from the FSM?
Only atheists talk about multiverses because they live by the facts and
not faith! :-).
"Live by the facts..." Do you actually *read* before you click send???

(ROFL!!)

Dawn
jojo
2024-12-28 11:57:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by In the Name of Jesus
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a
paper recently released by google about their new quantum chip
willow. they claim that the calculation it performed would
require a classical computer orders of magnitude more than the
age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it
performed would need more atoms than are present in the
universe and hence it is probably borrowing the additional ones
from parallel universes? something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which
says the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Did you distill that from the FSM?
Only atheists talk about multiverses because they live by the
facts and not faith! :-).
fsm??? if i had to place odds, 80% no such thing as multiverse,
20% maybe. we are at the very cutting edge of science here.
Peter Steele
2024-12-28 21:47:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by In the Name of Jesus
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a paper
recently released by google about their new quantum chip willow. they
claim that the calculation it performed would require a classical
computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it
is probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says the
universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Did you distill that from the FSM?
Only atheists talk about multiverses because they live by the facts
and not faith! :-).
fsm??? if i had to place odds, 80% no such thing as multiverse, 20%
maybe. we are at the very cutting edge of science here.
I've come to firmly believe in the presence of ghosts. Other than that
I rarely experience the supernatural.
jojo
2024-12-28 23:52:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by jojo
Post by In the Name of Jesus
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was
a paper recently released by google about their new quantum
chip willow. they claim that the calculation it performed
would require a classical computer orders of magnitude more
than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it
performed would need more atoms than are present in the
universe and hence it is probably borrowing the additional
ones from parallel universes? something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which
says the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Did you distill that from the FSM?
Only atheists talk about multiverses because they live by the
facts and not faith! :-).
fsm??? if i had to place odds, 80% no such thing as multiverse,
20% maybe. we are at the very cutting edge of science here.
I've come to firmly believe in the presence of ghosts.  Other
than that I rarely experience the supernatural.
yeah?? you have seen ghosts?
Peter Steele
2024-12-29 04:28:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by jojo
Post by In the Name of Jesus
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a
paper recently released by google about their new quantum chip
willow. they claim that the calculation it performed would require
a classical computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the
universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it
is probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says
the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Did you distill that from the FSM?
Only atheists talk about multiverses because they live by the facts
and not faith! :-).
fsm??? if i had to place odds, 80% no such thing as multiverse, 20%
maybe. we are at the very cutting edge of science here.
I've come to firmly believe in the presence of ghosts.  Other than
that I rarely experience the supernatural.
yeah?? you have seen ghosts?
Ghost. Singular. It was a complete surprise. I don't want to say too
much about it because that might limit my future encounters. This was
harmless and pleasant. It was twilight.

What I was talking about however is a quote by one of the famous
scientists saying that even though paranormal visitations are rare to
the individual, they are frequent for countries of peoples.

Mitchell Holman
2024-12-29 03:38:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by In the Name of Jesus
Only atheists talk about multiverses because they live by the facts and
not faith! :-).
"Facts fly you to the moon,
faith flies you into buildings"

- recently spotted bumper sticker -
jojo
2024-12-29 04:18:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by In the Name of Jesus
Only atheists talk about multiverses because they live by the facts and
not faith! :-).
"Facts fly you to the moon,
faith flies you into buildings"
- recently spotted bumper sticker -
LOL! 911
Peter Steele
2024-12-28 21:34:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a paper
recently released by google about their new quantum chip willow. they
claim that the calculation it performed would require a classical
computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed would
need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it is
probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says the
universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Why don't you finish exploring the known universe before you tell me how
small and shitty it is.
jojo
2024-12-28 23:56:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Peter Steele
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a
paper recently released by google about their new quantum chip
willow. they claim that the calculation it performed would
require a classical computer orders of magnitude more than the
age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it
performed would need more atoms than are present in the
universe and hence it is probably borrowing the additional ones
from parallel universes? something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which
says the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Why don't you finish exploring the known universe before you tell
me how small and shitty it is.
known universe, what is even known? we are not even half way there.
%
2024-12-29 00:00:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by jojo
Post by Peter Steele
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was a paper
recently released by google about their new quantum chip willow. they
claim that the calculation it performed would require a classical
computer orders of magnitude more than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it performed
would need more atoms than are present in the universe and hence it
is probably borrowing the additional ones from parallel universes?
something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which says the
universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Why don't you finish exploring the known universe before you tell me
how small and shitty it is.
known universe, what is even known? we are not even half way there.
yea but the light is on
jojo
2024-12-29 00:27:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by jojo
Post by Peter Steele
Post by jojo
not well versed at all in quantum computation, but there was
a paper recently released by google about their new quantum
chip willow. they claim that the calculation it performed
would require a classical computer orders of magnitude more
than the age of the universe.
then the interpretations began, that the calculation it
performed would need more atoms than are present in the
universe and hence it is probably borrowing the additional
ones from parallel universes? something to that effect...
i am not a fan of the multiverse, but there is no law which
says the universe we inhabit should be the only unique one.
Why don't you finish exploring the known universe before you
tell me how small and shitty it is.
known universe, what is even known? we are not even half way
there.
yea but the light is on
that it is, that. it. is.

are. lights are on.
Loading...